I think the Browns win Monday night

by Dawg Nuts on Oct 10, 2008 9:46 AM EDT

I make this argument based mainly on a Butch Davis "feelin' in my gut":

1. we're coming off a bye week, so we're well rested.

2. we have some guys coming back from injury that should help immediately (Tucker, Stallworth, Jones, etc.)

3. the team knows, whether they admit it publicly or not, this game is the season for them; lose and any slight glimmer of hope is extinguished.

4. there is extra incentive because it's the Giants on Monday night - surely pride makes them want to get revenge for the previous monday debacle against the Giants.

5. the Giants will eventually lose a game; there isn't going to be another undefeated team like NE last year; this could be a trap game for the Giants, due to overconfidence based on our record and what they did to us the last time.

I say Browns 24, Giants 20.

This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.

Tweet Comment 14 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

I see it, too. In my dreams, I say Brady Quinn, golden locks blowing in the wind as he races out of the tunnel to start the 2nd half. I see him heave mighty passes downfield with his massive, muscled arm…..hmm, this is kinda gay. I’ll stop now.

They’re the Giants, we’re the little guys. But sometimes, the little guy hits the giant with a rock and cuts his fucking head off with his own sword.

GO BROWNS

Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.

by BringBackKosar on Oct 10, 2008 10:28 AM EDT reply actions

At what point in your fantasy did Brady Quinn dye his hair blonde?

by rufio on Oct 10, 2008 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions

Yeah I know. But “golden locks” just sounds better. Though I guess “auburn locks” woulda been alright…..

Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.

by BringBackKosar on Oct 11, 2008 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions

Your dreams, man. I hope we get a look at him before we make the final QB decision, blonde or not.

by rufio on Oct 12, 2008 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions

And you poke fun at me about Harrison.

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by Chris Pokorny on Oct 10, 2008 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions

35 - 13 Giants

35 – 13 Giants

by AaronD on Oct 10, 2008 1:43 PM EDT reply actions

Woh, turn that around and add 1 to the Giants score and you would have been correct!

by gentryholdem on Oct 14, 2008 8:02 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs

Oh crap…

Take the 35 and subtract backwards (5-3) gives you 2.
Take the 13 and divide it backwards (3/1) gives you 3.

It’s all points back to the F’ing Number 23!

Just suffered through the Jim Carrey thriller

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by Chris Pokorny on Oct 16, 2008 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions

There have been some head scratching upsets on MNF over the years. Underdogs tend to play their best under the bright lights.

by elsandito on Oct 10, 2008 2:30 PM EDT reply actions

If we put together something that looks like our offense from last year and score a bunch of points on that D, I will consider that more than a slight glimmer of hope.

What if we score an offensive touchdown against pittsburgh?
What if DA doesn’t essentially give Baltimore 14 or so points off of turnovers?

If we had been performing close to where we can on offense, we would be 3-1. If we can find our offense against the Giants, we have a shot at beating any of the following: WAS, JAX, PIT, BAL, CIN, BUF, IND, HOU, and PHI (provided our D doesn’t take steps backward). Even if we lost 2 of those, we go 8-8. That would be about the best I could hope for at this point.

Not that I think this WILL happen, but hypothetically, even in a loss, we could gain back some hope from this game.

by rufio on Oct 10, 2008 9:38 PM EDT reply actions