Dawgs By Nature: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: SEC Basketball at the Half

Sizing Up the Browns' Injuries: Who's Ready, Who's Not

The Browns aren't out of things just yet. We're only two games out of the division lead with 12 more games to play. That's a lot of time to make up a lot of ground, but the only way we're going to have a chance to pull things together is if the team is healthy. Last season, much of our success depended on all of our top players being available when we needed them most.

This season, we've already had wounds to Derek Anderson, Braylon Edwards, Jamal Lewis, Eric Steinbach, Sean Jones, Brodney Pool, Willie McGinest, Martin Rucker, Beau Bell, Joe Jurevicius, Robaire Smith, Shaun Smith, and more. Imagine a football team trying to compete with the best of the best without those guys being 100%.

Some of them will be close to 100% when we face the Giants in 11 days. Others won't be near that percentage, but at least they'll make their return to the field. Here is a report on how things are going for players who have been out:

Stallworthjets_medium

A healthy Donte Stallworth will be a huge asset to the offense

  • WR Donte Stallworth: This guy has received a ton of heat for the quadriceps injury that has kept him out a month already. However, all of the heat stems from frustration more than personal animosity towards the guy. Stallworth's presence will be a potentially huge upgrade over Syndric Steptoe. Break a leg out there, Stallworth. Err...probably the wrong choice of words there.
  • OT Ryan Tucker: He is expected to return from a fractured hip suffered way back on May 14. Surprisingly, the OBR and other sources have indicated that his return may actually be at right tackle, replacing the "struggling" and wounded Kevin Shaffer. Tucker is probably this team's third best offensive lineman.
  • LB Willie McGinest: After missing the past two games due to a hamstring injury, he has started practicing again and should be ready for the Giants. That will take some playing time away from Alex Hall, but overall, Hall has probably earned himself more of a cut into McGinest's playing time.
  • TE Martin Rucker: There haven't been indications as to whether or not he'll actually be active, but for the first time since having arthroscopic knee surgery, he practiced on Wednesday.
  • FB Lawrence Vickers: He was struck in the eye with a bottle thrown from the crowd in the Bengals game. Besides a cut, he'll be fine, thankfully.
  • DL Shaun Smith: He had surgery to repair a broken bone in his right hand. For the past two weeks, he has played with a cast over it. He is expected to be ready for the Giants, so really the bye week couldn't have come at a better time for him.
  • S Sean Jones: Jones was one of the few players not to return to practice. As of this time, he is not expected to be ready against the Giants.
  • WR Joe Jurevicius: The same thing goes for Jurevicius -- it doesn't look as if he'll be even close to ready for the Giants game. If he is to start practicing again, it may not be until the actual halfway point of the season.
  • OT Kevin Shaffer: After suffering a concussion on Sunday, an update has not been given as to whether or not he'll be able to play against the Giants. However, considering the reports of Tucker taking over for him, maybe he won't be ready.

Altogether, the news is positive on the injury front.

Rubbish_medium I saw a quote from head coach Romeo Crennel over on the OBR that made me laugh. Maybe I'm just confused as to what he's trying to refer to:

Crennel said Anderson might need to go back to taking what the defense gives him, like he did in 2007.

"He might be trying to go down field a little more than he did last year," Crennel said. "He seemed to take more what the defense gave him last year."

Link

I could've sworn that up until the fourth quarter of the Bengals game, I never even saw Anderson throw the ball down the field. All I kept seeing were comeback routes that defensive backs were sitting on. Our success came when Anderson threw the ball down the field -- like the pass to Winslow amidst two-three defenders down near the goal line.

Finally, remember the apparent Anderson/Edwards/Lewis love-fest on the sidelines during the Bengals' game? According to Anderson, the confrontation wasn't a negative one, reports the Chronicle-Telegram:

Despite television evidence to the contrary, Anderson disputed that any incident occurred.

"There was no argument whatsoever," he said Wednesday. "I just mentioned to him about being smart, getting the personal foul.

"He and I were talking. He wasn’t yelling at me, nothing was going on. Jamal happened to come over and we were in the process of getting the whole offense together. It looked like we were arguing and he grabbed a hold of us, which wasn’t the case."

Link

They probably could've exchanged punches on television and would've stuck with the same story.

Poll
Who should start at right tackle against the Giants, assuming both men are fairly healthy?
Kevin Shaffer
37 votes
Ryan Tucker
184 votes

221 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 13 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Crennel’s quote is just another indication that is clueless. What game is he watching? Anderson thrived last year by being aggressive and throwing the ball downfield. It makes me sick to think our coach is either saying this to avoid answering a real question or just doesn’t actually understand how the offense is working

by Roger Dorn on Oct 2, 2008 12:41 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

really. And there were some that worry that Bill Cowher wouldn’t be willing or able to run a team with a pass first “Air Coryall” offense? Give me a break.

by Ryan Kelsey on Oct 2, 2008 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This isn’t last year. Things, you know, change. Defenses have adjusted to what the Browns and Anderson like to do.

What defenses are doing is rolling the field towards our deep threat, Braylon Edwards. They man up with a corner and move their free safety closer to him. They are also high/low bracketing Winslow by putting a linebacker over him to protect against slants with a safety over top.

There are limited deep play opportunities now. People need to realize that this offense does not have its pieces in place. The acquisition of Stallworth was meant to protect from defenses doing this. With the loss of Stallworth and Jurevicius there is literally no way you can run the system. Not with Syndric Steptoe and whoever else is out there.

by gahnki on Oct 2, 2008 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t disagree. My point was that Romeo’s reflection on what has actually transpired is incorrect. Anderson has not been throwing the ball downfield this year because of the coverages you cited. Romeo is right that Anderson should take what the defenses give him, wrong about Anderson throwing the ball downfield more this year than last.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 3, 2008 8:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its not always the free safety on Edwards, and they aren’t always doing this where they man up and double cover our two best guys. The line has been banged up too and so people can blitz us and get to Anderson whereas last year we were basically impenetrable. A lot of DAs picks have been in to zone coverage too.

Even with the pieces we have, if the opposing D rushed the passer with, say, 4 guys, the coverage you cited leaves pure 1 on 1 matchups for the rest of our targets. This means guys like Jerome Harrison could be left in a situation where if they catch a ball and make one guy miss, they are gone. I don’t expect Steptoe to beat anyone deep for TDs, but did you expect JJ to? Granted, JJ can do a LOT of things Steptoe can’t, but our deep threat wasn’t really ever coming from him. Anyway, I like Harrison, and even Vickers, Heiden, or Jamal Lewis in a pure 1 on 1 matchup…so why aren’t they getting the ball with a chance to make a play? Imagine Jamal catching a swing pass with Kellen and Braylon clearing out deep…he would have to lower his shoulder on one linebacker, and then he has at least 15 yards. I’ll take that all day. If we run the deep routes and at least make them options, it opens the underneath stuff up.

Getting guys like Stallworth, Rucker, and Tucker back will be huge and will make us better, don’t get me wrong. It doesn’t completely explain why we have been so terrible so far though. Really we are only missing JJ from last year. We should still be better than we are right now.

by rufio on Oct 3, 2008 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

They aren’t double covering Edwards. The free safety isn’t “on him”. His responsibility isn’t just Edwards, but they are still moving him over in order to cheat to that side of the field.

And your second paragraph is exactly correct. That’s what Crennel is saying. Anderson is locking onto his two main targets while neglecting the favorable match ups elsewhere.

by gahnki on Oct 3, 2008 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So why are we even playing Steptoe at all? Why not throw out another TE or RB or put someone out as a WR who isn’t truly a WR but who is better than Steptoe? You can’t put that on DA. Last year’s offense was unafraid to bring in new things: formation shifts, motions, even the super gimmicky unbalanced line. Why don’t we do something odd now?

Lining Harrison up in the slot or even out wide seems like a natural thing to do. If Kellen and Braylon are lined up on the same side of the field out wide, you either have to take that LB out there to cover Kellen, or you have to cover him with someone else. If the LB goes out with Kellen, that means Jamal Lewis with Vickers lead-blocking against a 6 man front! If the LB stays inside, you have Kellen 1 on 1 with possible safety help deep (coverage he can beat) or Kellen in zone coverage: he can get open 10+ yards down the field in either situation, especially if Braylon is going deep too.

Everyone in the organization should know that DA is not going to win by knowing exactly what the defense is going to do before the snap, looking off one or two guys, and hitting a 3rd guy on a short touch pass. It simply won’t happen. You didn’t tell Steve Young to sit quietly in the pocket, you didn’t tell Brett Favre to be cautious, you can’t change who a guy is as a player. We should be gearing the offense to at least try to go after the things that DA does do well, and we aren’t (certainly not from what I have seen which has admittedly not been the last two games).

Yes, DA has to look guys off more often when they aren’t open, or at least look for some “high reward” for his high risk. But the playcalling and the design of the offense looks to have changed as well.

by rufio on Oct 3, 2008 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A win is a win and we celebrate any win. I think we’ll all agree, though, that Sunday’s effort was not good enough to beat maybe 25 NFL teams. Let’s hope we can build off of that effort.

by elsandito on Oct 2, 2008 5:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I really hope Romeo misspoke and meant to say DA needs to return to last year where he was throwing the ball downfield more. I really think that he did not misspeak.

I love the “huh?” monkey.

by rufio on Oct 2, 2008 6:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It seems like Anderson has been reluctant to throw deep at all this year. What on earth is Romeo watching? Like you, I also love the monkey.

by fwembt on Oct 2, 2008 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So, if Tucker plays Right Tackle, does that mean we like Hadnot more than Schaffer?

by Ryan Kelsey on Oct 3, 2008 1:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Schaffer is making too much not to start. If this becomes a season long trend, he may be a cut next year

by Roger Dorn on Oct 3, 2008 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Schaffer did get a concussion. So no, at least not for game 5. If it becomes a trend, it could mean one of three things: 1. they think that Hadnot is a better G than Schaffer is a RT, or 2. they think Tucker is a better RT than RG, 3. a combination of 1 and 2.

by rufio on Oct 3, 2008 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

Start posting about the Browns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Brown-ratterman_small
Brown: The Real Color of the Super Bowl

Recent FanPosts

Awesome_small
7 ROUND Browns Mock Draft
42867-mcgahee_1_small
Bill Parcells' Guide to Rebuilding the Browns
Otto_small
Ravens Owner disses Cleveland
019_small
New Salary Structure
Hahahame_small
Keep an Eye on the Vernon Gholston Situation.
Hahahame_small
A gameplan for the Browns' draft.
Otto_small
A case for trading Josh Cribbs
Logo_ksu1_small
2010 Pro Bowl
Small
The Dreaded Bottlegate

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Browns Links


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Moderators

Pryor_small Buckeye Brad