Week 5 - Official Browns Bye Week Thread
It's the bye week for the Cleveland Browns, but there are still plenty of games around the AFC North today.
This is the official thread to discuss any of the Week 5 games, but these games in particular:
- Tennessee at Baltimore
- Cincinnati at Dallas
- Pittsburgh at Jacksonville
And, even though we're not playing, as always, GO BROWNS!!!
70 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Defensive game between the Titans/Ravens so far here in the second quarter.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
Good to see the Titans’ offense also struggling against the Ravens. Their D is better than ours, though, particularly at LB and the pass-rushing position (OLB for us, DE for them). Hopefully they can hand one of our division-mates a loss today.
I would’ve enjoyed seeing Vince Young receive a special package or two in his return week, but against the Ravens’ defense, that’s something I’d probably hold off on. Let’s hope Kerry Collins can muster one TD drive, because that may be all it takes.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Oct 5, 2008 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Was he the “#2” or “#3” this week? Its pretty amazing how well Tennessee is playing right now considering their 1st round QB who was picked in the top 5 is not really meeting expectations.
Also, I have been very wrong about Haynesworth so far this year; I thought he would tail off after he got his money.
Giants up 27-6 against Seattle.
The Giants are SO good that they aren’t going to let up on anybody. In fact, the weaker the team, the more they’ll be thirsty to make a statement and get some big hits in. We’re going to need to be at the top of our games just not to embarrass ourselves, though it should help that we’re at home.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
Did anyone see Houston’s meltdown against the Colts? Rosenfels played well all game, then gave it away in the last 5 minutes with two stupid fumbles. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a team break down like that at the end of the game. The Colts are lucky — they should have lost.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
Rosenfels got hellicoptered on that one play. Sweet hit. True the Colts should have lost, but credit their D on coming up bigtime in crunchtime.
Yeah, give credit to their defense. But it was mostly Rosenfels being careless with the football. If he tucks it under his arms, then the Colts don’t get the football.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
The Browns got blown out by the Cowboys at home, but beat the Bengals who are close to beating the Cowboys on the road. Also, the Browns almost beat the Steelers, who had to take the Ravens to overtime, and the Ravens just barely got beat by the undefeated Titans. The Bengals almost beat the Giants in overtime a week ago.
All of those crazy things considered, surely you have to feel the Browns have a shot against the Giants in some wacky way ;)
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
I think I agree with this, but only with the caveat that we need to be able to protect our QB as well. New York’s defense is absolutely predicated on getting to the QB and I think everyone who watches the game knows this. Justin Tuck vs. the right side of our line is not looking like a very favorable matchup for us right now.
The Dolphins won last year, anything is possible.
The Browns have looked like crap in every regular and preseason game, even the win against Cincy. And now you want to believe the Giants will have any trouble in disposing of us? We should at least wait until there’s some evidence that the Browns have woken up. I haven’t seen this evidence.
As long as we are talking about other teams...
Anyone catch the Buckeyes yesterday? Due to Colorado getting slaughtered right down the street last night, I didn’t get the game.
From the stat line it looked like Pryor was pretty efficient passing, but didn’t complete a lot of balls in the 10+yd range. Lots of passes for not much yardage. Is that unfair? It also looked like Beanie didn’t get the ball enough. Fair?
Watching him stiff-arm a Wisco guy for 5+ yards in to the endzone was amazing.
Yeah, Beanie is amazing. That’s why he’s going to be a top-5 pick. He is fast yet powerful. I thought they gave him the ball quite a bit.
They didn’t let Pryor throw much. I guess they were being conservative with him. There were a couple drops on some of his long throws (not easy catches, though). When he did roll out to throw, either there wasn’t guys open or he didn’t see him because he had time to look but couldn’t find anyone. He took a few sacks that way. It’s good that he’s looking down the field to throw, but when it’s not there he just need to take off running. He had a few long runs, but a couple big sacks made his rushing average look small.
That last TD was sweet, though. Pryror and Wells running the option — that has to give defensive coordinators nightmares. There was only one LB covering, and when he went for Wells then Pryor just took off and ran. It seemed that he covered those 12 yards to the end zone in about 3 steps. He is fast. We need to see more of that.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
It would be hard to stay away from him if a team needing a RB were drafting in the top-5, especially after he runs a ridiculous 40 time at OSU’s notoriously fast track. But wouldn’t the injuries scare you away? He hasn’t been healthy since (maybe) highschool. AD dropped to 7th…
I would still love to see him in orange and brown.
Pryor doesn’t even look like he is trying when he runs, or throws for that matter. Yet he seems to glide right by guys and throw frozen ropes 40+ yards. Glad he is living up to the hype for now.
Not sure he is living up to the hype. Going into the last drive Pryor had gone 10-15 for 85 yards passing and run 11 times for 19 yards. If DA does that there is no end to the screaming for Quinn. Pryor will be good, maybe even great, but right now he is barely the best QB on his team and still some distance behind the Juice Williams’ of the world.
Are you kidding me? He is a true freshman playing in his first road game in a hostile environment. Of course he’s going to make some mistakes, but waching him play he definately looks in control of the team and knows what he’s doing. I never expected him to be playing this much right away, and neither did anyone else I heard talk about him (which was a lot of people). So the fact that he’s starting and playing this well, I would say he’s far exceeding the hype. DA has been in the NFL for, what, 4 or 5 years, so you cannot compare those situations.
Also, his running stats were distorted because of a couple big sacks. He had a few really nice long runs. And they don’t ask him to pass much, but when he does it’s usually on target. If you think he isn’t living up to the hype, then your expectations were way too high.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
Nope, not kidding. We are talking about a player who threw for 144 yards and rushed for 20 and you use these superlatives “looks in control,” “knows what he is doing,” “playing this well,” “far exceeding the hype.” No way. 144 yards passing and 20 rushing. That is nothing but relying on Beanie Wells and praying the kid doesn’t have to actually play quarterback. Two of the sacks he took were massive yardage because he lacks the wherewithal to not quit running straight backwards under pressure.
Again, 144/20. If you see greatness in that you have lost all pretense of objectivity.
The guys is a freshman with three starts playing the most difficult position in football. Seriously, what do you expect? I never said he was great NOW. He will be great some day, based on how he has performed so far. Like I said, nobody expected him to step in and be a star right away. He wasn’t even supposed to start this year! If that’s the “hype” you’re talking about, then I guess he didn’t. But nobody that I read or talked to expected that.
It is obvious from watching him play that the kid is immensly talented. Does he have a lot to learn? Of course! I never implied that he didn’t. I would say that he is far exceeding my (and most people’s) expectations of him so far this year. I call that “living up to the hype.”
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
If you don’t think I’m objective, here are some other writer’s thoughts from the game. The first is from ESPN.com’s Big Ten blogger, and the second is from one of the great writers at collegefootballnews.com. A fantastic site if you love college football.
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/bigten/0-2-311/Pryor-comes-of-age-in-dramatic-Wisconsin-win.html
http://cfn.scout.com/2/797713.html
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
If someone doesn’t believe that Terrelle is living up to the hype then they can go tell the coaches that. They would vehemently disagree.
This isn’t baseball where you have a nice list of objective tools to determine performance. There is no Vorp or OPS figure that tells you who played well. Even if you were going off the “raw” data you would have to be pleased.
A 68% completion percentage is very nice to see. However, TP did miss reads on a few coverages. For instance, he had Devier Posey open on a drag route but took a sack instead.That will change with time.
Really, this smells like a negative nancy trying to find something wrong with a true freshman leading an 80 yard drive for the victory. There really isn’t. Only special players can make that happen.
He’s a true freshman starting on the road at Camp Randall Stadium.
I cannot believe that someone who actually watched the game could even write what you just did.
144 and 20. That’s great now? Awesome, that means Charlie Frye should be back any day now. Look, I like Pryor, I’m just of the fawning over him. The Ohio State Buckeyes begin and end with Beanie Wells. Pryor manages games like Trent Dilfer did with the Ravens and like any number of quarterbacks do when they have a great halfback. I said that he would be great at some point, and I believe that. He isn’t right now and Beanie Wells is.
Let’s also not forget that it was Wisconsin sitting so deep on that last drive that let Pryor accrue a good chunk of those passing yards. Before that drive he had thrown for 85 yards.
Trent Dilfer?? You’re comparing Terrelle Pryor to Tent Dilfer? Could Dilfer had made the TD run that Pryor made to win the game on Saturday? Pryor can make great plays — have you even watched any games? He’s not great all the time, of course, but he certainly has shown the abilities to be a playmaker. He had 4TD passes in his first start!!
This season, as a true freshman, Pryor has completed 65% of his passes at 6.77 yards/attempt with 5 Td’s and 2 Int’s. He has also averaged 5 yards per carry with 4 TD’s on the ground. Do those looks like Charlie Frye or Trent Dilfer numbers to you?
Listen, nobody is arguing that Beanie Wells isn’t OSU’s best player or the key to their offense. Everybody knows that. But to say that Pryor “hasn’t lived up to the hype” is simply ridiculous.
Plenty of sportswriters across the country have written about how much better than expected Pryor has been this year. Did you read those article I posted above? I think you’re the one that is not being objective.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
Let’s also not forget that it was Wisconsin sitting so deep on that last drive that let Pryor accrue a good chunk of those passing yards. Before that drive he had thrown for 85 yards.
You know why they were sitting deep?
They couldn’t afford to man up and attack or OSU would run a four vertical play and allow the receiver’s to clear out room for TP to run for a mile. Terrelle’s skill set is forcing bad matchups for defensive coordinators. His ability handcuffs them on what they can run.
No one is saying that he is the greatest quarterback who ever lived. He has a long way to go as a quarterback. However, I think that everyone here believes that your characterization of him not living up to the hype is where the problem lies.
Dude.
Are you kidding? Ok so maybe you don’t think Pryor had a good stat line, but at least acknowledge that sacks are taken away from his stats because that’s how they do in college. Also, I would argue that the only stat that matters is W-L. He found a way to get it done.
But that isn’t even the most arguable part of your post. JUICE WILLIAMS!?!?!?!?!!!!!? Ha! You could have at least gone with someone….I dunno, good? He isn’t the QB with the best stats, he isn’t the QB who is going to be the best pro QB, he isn’t the unquestioned leader of even the questionably best team in America, he doesn’t have incredible physical tools….
That’s tough. He is great, but Colt McCoy and Sam Bradford have been pretty fantastic as well. McCoy is running a lot this year, also (not sure about Bradford). Neither of them have played any really good teams so far, although McCoy looked pretty good at Colorado last Saturday. We’ll tell a lot more about those two when they play each other this weekend.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Oct 7, 2008 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions
I am using my predictive powers to let you know that you will agree with me by the end of the season
You watch football right? I said Williams was better on Saturday, and he was. There is absolutely no way to argue that.
Juice Williams also has a lifetime completion percentage of 50%.
He hasn’t broken 60% in a single season for his entire career. I find it infinitely entertaining that you complain about Terrelle in the following manner:
..praying the kid doesn’t have to actually play quarterback.
Praising Juice Williams when he can’t even break 60% completion percentage is awfully suspect. I’m guessing you haven’t kept up on the fact that Juice Williams was benched last season at multiple times. Your argument seems razor thin right now. I’m actually not quite sure where you are going with this Juice Williams comparison. I
Absolutely, I watch the games I get on TV. I can also read, comprehend, analyze, and evaluate your argument here, which is what I am doing. You also never said this was a one-day comparison. Calculating the skill of a QB at any point in time implies a taking-in-to-account of more than one game that QB has played (unless, of course, that QB has only played one game). You weren’t arguing who had the better night, you were arguing who was better overall, that Pryor was not better-than-advertised so far, and that OSU fans/coaches had to “pray the kid doesn’t actually have to play quarterback”.
Side note: a superlative is something that is of the highest degree or skill, such as “the best” or “the most talented”. Think about those things in your yearbook; “most likely to suceed”, “craziest hair”etc. People were not using superlatives by saying he looked in control or like he knew what he was doing. Fail.
OSU coaches have other options who are more mature than Pryor, who have been in the system longer, who are more experienced. Yet, when the game was on the line, the ball was in Pryor’s hands. He scored the winning TD for chrissake! That hardly seems like “praying” he didn’t have to make a play.
What really undermines your argument, however, is that you use Juice as a standard for greatness. He is not the BEST (superlative) in any facet of the QB game in college this year, nor did he have the best game last weekend, regardless of criteria. Graham Harrell had more TDs, a better completion %, had more yards and led his offense to more points than did Williams.
Speaking of, what exactly are your criteria for evaluating a QB? I threw out some common ones in my last post, but you declined to give a reason as to why Williams was the “better” QB. You simply mention Pryor’s stats and his perceived lack of yardage. I contend that the only stats that matter for QBs are Ws and to a lesser extent points scored. Did Williams have better stats on Saturday? Absolutely, and no one was claiming that Pryor really shined in the box score. I was impressed that he found a way to win, and led a 4th quarter comeback at age 19 at night on the road in a loud stadium where the home team had pretty good winning streaks both at night and at home. I asked about his passing, which could have been as bad as you suggest; I only saw highlights. Regardless: Pryor is 3-0 as a starter this year. Juice is 3-2.
How do you measure Passers by stats? Passer rating? What if a RB gets a trick play and throws one pass for 99yds and a TD? Is that RB all of a sudden the best QB in college? How small is too small a number of attempts? What about TDs? What if the QB threw a screen pass and his monster WR took the ball 80+ yds by himself? What if I rack up huge numbers against a Division I-AA team and lose? What if I have poor stats against USC or Bama or LSU or Oklahoma but win? What if my wideouts are horrible? There are too many variables to go purely on stats in football.
I guarantee you that if DA didn’t approach last year’s stats, but won every game that way less people would be calling for Quinn (there are a few who would call for him no matter what).
Here is what else is wrong with your argument: Pryor’s hype was that he was one of the best recruits in the class, was a physical freak, was very mature for his age, and could become a great college QB. So far I think he has met that. Additionally, he actually taken over the starting job 3-4 games in to the year, something that most didn’t think he could do, especially with a guy like JT at the helm, who errors by not playing young guys enough if anything. How is that not exceeding his hype? Who was actually hyped as a HS recruit who came in as a QB, took the starting job early in the season from a future draft pick, and then passed the ball well while being such a good runner?
by rufio on Oct 7, 2008 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Superlative can also be used to mean any overreaching amount of praise. It’s usual called the absolute comparative and is more commonly found in the romance languages. Sometimes words can mean more than one thing. Fail.
Look, I don’t want to argue this any more beacuse at the end of the day we both benefit when Pryor plays well. My main points are this:
- Pryor was not great on Saturday. He had one fantastic drive.
- Juice Williams was better this Saturday.
- Using wins for a QB is a lot like using them for a starting pitcher.
- I, personally, have not yet seen the type of performance that incidcates that Pryor is well and truly already great.
I’m out on this one. I’ll admit that I care far more about the Browns than I ever will about the Buckeyes. If you think Pryor has already outlived the hype, fine. I’ll continue to believe he could be great but is not yet. We’ll both live happy and productive lives and enjoy the OSU games. Deal?
You seem to be viewing the phrase “living up to the hype” different from everyone else here. I, and a few others, have repeatedly said that nobody considers Pryor “great” right now. He played great at times but also played like a true freshman at times, which he is.
When I said he’s living up to the hype, I mean of what I (and others) expected him to do as a true freshman. You seem to imply that you think the “hype” was that he would step right in as a freshman and be great right away. If that’s what you mean, then I agree that he’s not doing that. But nobody I heard or read expected greatness from him after only a few games, so that’s not what I mean. He is certainly exceeding my expectations for this year, so I would say he is “living up to the hype.”
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
Some words can be used to mean more than one thing, but have connotative definitions such that when used in a given context they only mean one thing: in this case, hyperbolism and exaggeration of praise to the extent that it is ridiculous and/or implicative of a certain QB being the “best” or “the ___est” or having the “best night”. I hardly think “looks like he knows what he is doing” can be equated to exaggerated praise, certainly not to that extent. I know that when you opened up your little dictionary, it says “overreaching praise” or something similar, but it doesn’t really mean to any degree. You sir, are wrong.
It’s like the word “hit”. Yes, it can have many definitions, but given the context of what is going on you know exactly what I mean. For instance, if The Todd said he was going to “hit that” in reference to a female nurse on the TV show Scrubs, it would not mean the same thing as if Shaun Rogers said he was going to “hit that running back till he doesn’t remember where he is”. (Probably).
in other words, go look it up again . Notice how many of those definitions use terms like “highest degree” or “greatest degree” and the one that doesn’t uses “lavished” and “exaggerated”. “Looks like he knows what he is doing” ≠ “lavishing”. “Better than expected” ≠ “should win the Heisman”.
Yeah, Pryor’s physical skills are amazing. He reminds me of watching Michael Vick at Virginia Tech, in both his running ability and the effortless way the throws the ball. I remember him in the national championship against FSU and he dominated that game. Pryor can have the same affect. Of course, he’s not there yet. But he has that ability.
Also, Pryor is about 4 or 5 inches taller than Vick. I just hope he’s not killing dogs in the offseason.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Oct 6, 2008 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions
It appears that JT adheres to the Woodrow Hayes philosphy of don’t throw unless it augments the run. With talent like Wells and Pryor lugging the ball, there’s no need to heave the ball into harm’s way. On that last drive, Pryor hit a couple of receivers with a sweet touch on the ball. Still, with a frosh qb at the helm for OSU, I expect the Lions to win the Big Ten this year. But, how much more fun is it to watch OSU with these guys in the backfield?
The Penn State-OSU game on the 25th should be very entertaining. I’m really interested in seeing how Daryll Clark handles a big road venue. This week’s game at Wisconsin should help decipher that.
Yeah, that looks like it could be for the Big Ten title (and PSU’s shot at a national title if they can get by Wisconsin). Although the Michigan State game also worries me. They’re tough.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
I’d say more Vince Young than Vick. Vick’s running style had him taking plenty of direct hits while you rarely saw Young get hit straight on. Pryor’s gliding style makes him more like Young. And he has been an accurate passer thus far.
I guess it’s just memories of watching that Sugar Bowl in the dorms at YSU and seeing Vick single-handedly keep Virginia Tech in that game. He was awesome. Pryor brings back those memories. Also, I remember the way that Vick threw the ball downfield (and about 50 yards) looked almost effortless, and Pryor’s motion is the same way.
Also, speaking of Young, I hear an anaylst on TV say that Pryor’s passing ability right now is about the same as Young’s when he was a junior. So that says something.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
Thought I’d chip in (very late) to this conversation —
I think Jimmy T is, obviously, still working Pryor fully into the Offense. The guy is only a freshman and this was his first away-game start — and against a pretty decent Wisconsin team. I thought he held up incredibly well under the pressure, especially in the fourth quarter.
Beanie is the man, though. I fully expect this OSU to explode right now. Between Beanie and Pryor — I mean….this team is a helluva lot of fun to watch. And certainly an inherently better team than when Boeckman is in.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Oct 6, 2008 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions
Back to Browns
With Willie likely to play against NY next week, everyone says Hall will see little if any time. Personally at this point I’d take Hall’s raw speed and energy over McGuinest’s experience. Along those lines, I’ve heard some folks say that the threat Hall poses could take some pressure off Wimbley. Now, I haven’t recorded any of the games (too cheap to invest in the DVR) so I have to go on what I notice on a one-time pass. The only thing that I’ve noticed in regards to Wimbley is his large, graceful sweeps to try and out-flank the tackle (singing “give me 40 acres and I’ll turn this rig around”). Is he in fact getting double-teamed? It seems to me that if he is getting doubled and Rogers is getting doubled and Williams and Smith are occupying one guy each that there ought to be some openings for someone else to get into the backfield. But, again, I just don’t recall seeing those double-teams on Wimbley. Am I just myopic?
I only saw the first two games, and no Wimbley was not being constantly double-teamed. The tackle probably got help from a back, but knowing that Wimbley only has that one move, the OT would just line up and get outside as far as he could as fast as he could. That pretty much took care of it. I also have images of Ben standing in the pocket in his own endzone while 3 of our linemen were engaged and just standing there.
If Wimbley was double-teamed, and Rogers was double-teamed, and the offense had either a TE or a back in protection, they would have been able to negate our pass rush every time because we rarely brought more than 4. It sounded like that changed against Baltimore, but I did not watch the game.
Hall would open things up for Wimbley, but only if he can beat one guy (something he won’t be able to do by using his only move). My question is why we don’t have Wimbley do his thing with Shaun Smith looking to penetrate in to the A gap, taking the OG with him. Then, when the OT is out taking care of KW, and the OG goes inside with Smith, send Pool, Jones, Jackson, Leon Williams, anyone up that B gap? If we time it right, we have someone going full steam at a back or better yet an unaware QB. When OTs start anticipating KW’s move we could really exploit this area with stunts and slants and blitzes.
1. It seems ridiculous to discuss defense when the offense isn’t putting enough pts on the board to win, no matter the defense.
2. Criticize the pass rush all you want, but probably the reason RC refuses to rush more than 4 is that he has zero confidence in any one on one pass coverages. The backfield is not NFL quality and the only way to hide this is to add bodies to coverage.
Uh, have you ever played Madden? Look at how many defensive plays can rush 5 and still cover almost every area of the field. Also, pass pressure makes up for liabilities in coverage (see: New York Giants). Having a great secondary doesn’t mean a damn thing if you can’t get pressure. The Broncos have Champ Bailey and ‘Dre Bly, one DB who has been the best in the league for the past 10 or so years, and another who could make the Pro Bowl in any given year, yet they are 30th in the NFL in pass yds/game. Even those guys can’t do a damn thing with Ebenezer Ekuban rushing the passer.
Yes, the offense needs to score more.
Are you sure your point addresses my point about having a substandard def backfield? Is this theoretical Madden backfield substandard? How do you compare a good backfield with no pass rush to a bad backfield with no pass rush? Plus, I’m only supposing the reason that RC only rushes 3 or 4. This is not defending his decision. Do not misunderstand, I would not question any decision RC makes re our defense. He has proven time and again to be one of the foremost minds in the pros at this one thing.
Yes, I believe my point does address the substandard backfield. You said RAC doesn’t trust our DBs with “one-on-one matchups”. There are ways to NOT leave your DBs in one-on-ones if you rush 5—that was my point about Madden.
A good backfield with no pass rush gives up a lot of yards, and at times a lot of points. That was my point about Denver’s D. They have a really talented offense; everyone copies their running game, Jay Cutler is coming in to his own at QB, Brandon Marshall was leading the league in catches even though he had to miss a game, Eddie Royal has been outstanding for a 2nd round pick, etc. But they still weren’t winning games till this year, and their offense is still carrying them. The D has given up 38, 32, and 33 points this year, and those 33 were to the Chiefs. Even with a pair of DBs who are pretty much agreed upon as great—including the best in one the league—they are stuggling to stop the pass: 30th in pass yards allowed. Keep in mind with our DBs we are 10th in the league in pass yards allowed.
Now the NYG’s DBs last year were pretty bad. Aaron Ross was alright, but they won the Super Bowl last year with I believe a couple of injuries back there, and clearly saw the need to upgrade the DBs; they spent 2 draft picks on the secondary, including their 1st rounder. James Butler, Kevin Dockery, and a 34 year old Sam Madison aren’t exaclty the scariest bunch. They may have given up yards and some points, but they were clearly a better defense than the Broncos and more importantly, WON with a substandard backfield because they constantly blitzed and got pressure on the QB.
The case I am making with this limited anecdotal evidence is that I believe it is better to have a substandard backfield with a good pass rush than to have a good backfield with a substandard pass rush. Even a crappy DB can cover one on one for 2-3 seconds, and the best DBs can’t cover for 7-10 seconds. That’s how I compare them.
I didn’t mean to jump on this idea as if it were yours. I would argue that you are defending the decision by saying that you trust Romeo with any decision he makes with our D. That seems to be a perfectly fine statement to make, however, because our D looks much improved vs. last year and is actually holding opposing teams to a reasonable amount of points. It’s just discouraging to see the opposing QB standing tall in the pocket un-threatened for so long at times. As long as we can hold teams to a respectable amount of points, I will try not to complain.
I hate watching opposing qbs count the house as much as you or anyone else does. My overriding feeling is that if we aren’t going to trust RC with the defense, what the * do we need him for? I don’t see him doing anything else well.
Complain all you want. This team is 1-3 and looking like it should be 1-3. I’m unhappy, discouraged and disillusioned.
The question the coaches have to answer is whether Hall is a liability mentally. He has done a fine job as a speed rusher type, but can he handle the mental part of the entire game. If the coaches can trust Hall then I see no reason why he shouldn’t start above McGinest.
A Plea for Help
I have two questions. One, does anyone really believe that Brady Quinn is part of the solution? And, two, can Chris Pokorny please e-mail me at jowoods@nytimes.

by 
















