Dawgs By Nature: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

Official Cowher-to-Cleveland Thread

I am sure this has been discussed at length, but I didn't see a recent fanpost about it.  I do know, however, that Browns fans across the country have one idea keeping them excited in this dreary season aside from Brady Quinn: the prospect of Bill Cowher on the sidelines in 2009.

Star-divide

Already, an official Cowher-to-Cleveland website has popped up:

http://www.cowher09.com

And there are myriad stories sprouting everywhere from Browns fans and objective observers discussing the potential for Bill Cowher to become the Browns head coach in 2009.

Obviously, it is exciting to think about and Bill Cowher has a proven track record.  My devil's advocate thought is this: would the Browns be better off finding a young guy like a Mike Tomlin as opposed to a retread like Cowher, even though Cowher had a great deal of success?  With the success of Harbaugh in Balt, Sparano in Miami, the dude down in Atlanta, a lot of people seem to think this is the new way to go.

I've heard this idea bandied about, but I have to say that I disagree with it.  If Bill Cowher is available, how do you not go after him?  I think it's a foregone conclusion that Romeo will be gone, and the Browns can't go into any kind of rebuilding mode -- we need something that will provide immediate hope and immediate results.  Bill Cowher would be able to do that.

Count me among the many who hopes to see it become a reality.

Poll
Should the Browns do whatever is necessary to get Bill Cowher?
Yes
37 votes
No - find a new young guy to start fresh
11 votes
No - firing Romeo would be a hasty decision
2 votes
Yes - but not if he wants total control of football operations
18 votes

68 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 123 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Dawgs By Nature

Comments

Display:

I honestly don’t know what everyone’s crush on Cowher is about—at least in terms of “track record”.

Yes, he was a good coach. Yes, he beat the Browns a whole lot. But as much as I hate the steelers, that organization is good. They had a lot of talent there, a lot of continuity and Tomlin stepped in and was willing to keep the defense intact and there was little to no dropoff. He coached for a long time at that one place with all that talent and only won one superbowl. In fact, he only had 2/10 years with more than one win in the playoffs, EVEN when he had teams go 12-4, 13-3, and 15-1. 12-9 in the playoffs is decent, and I would probably kill to get the Browns even in the playoffs right now, but compare that with a guy like Belichick (cheating as he may be) or Bill Walsh and Cowher looks a lot more like Brian Billick (5-3 playoff record).

If we are going to have to get a new head coach and sit through some more rebuilding, I would rather have a young guy who is fresh, excited, and willing to work hard. It seems like it would be really easy to improve over Romeo right now, but its certainly not a guarantee.

by rufio on Nov 10, 2008 1:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The fascination with Cowher is that he’s a guaranteed steep upgradef from Romeo “What Me Worry” Crennel. With young untested head coaches, you roll the dice. Most people around here have had a belly full of rolling snake eyes. The Browns continue the rebuild mode and won’t be going to many playoffs no matter the coach. We simply want to be entertained instead of made to feel angry and frustrated.

by elsandito on Nov 10, 2008 2:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This year there have been many new coaches who took over a bad team and made a huge improvement. Tony Sporano in Miami, Mike Smith in Atlanta, Harbaugh in Baltimore, and Wisenhunt in Arizona last year. The Browns need to find a guy like that. A young assistant who can come in and make an immediate impact on the team. I don’t know who, but it needs to be someone with attitude. I guess they tried hiring an assistant with Romeo and it didn’t work, but they just need to find the right guy. I don’t know if Cowher is the right guy for this team. And I think Savage should stay on as GM because he’s done a decent job rebuilding this team. He hasn’t been perfect, but I don’t think we need to start completely over and go in to rebuilding again. Find a guy with a defensive background who can improve our defense. I like our offense if Chud can learn to use Harrison and Cribbs more.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 10, 2008 3:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure Tomlin, Sporano, Mike Smith and Harbaugh look good now, but the jury is still out on them. Lane Kiffin was a young exciting guy too. So was Mike Nolan. Sometimes they work out, sometimes they don’t. The biggest argument for Cowher is that he is that we would not be risking the new coach to turn out to be not head coach material. We know Cowher is.

Personally, I want Cowher, but I’m not crazy about the idea of losing Savage or giving anyone coaching and gm powers, so I’m torn on the issue. But let’s not be ridiculous and try and say Cowher is anything except the most qualified guy in the world, young, exciting, proven, with strong Cleveland and Cleveland Brown ties.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 10, 2008 7:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think you can blame Lane Kiffin for the problems in Oakland — those obviously go well beyond him. Also, I would call Cowher many things, but “young” isn’t one of them.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 10, 2008 8:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

he’s just 51. So maybe he’s no Mike Tomlin, but that isn’t a geezer for someone with 15 years of head coaching experience.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 11, 2008 12:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

No one has a chance in Oakland till Al Davis gives up the team.

by rufio on Nov 11, 2008 1:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I believe there are much better coaches than Bill Cowher out there.

by gahnki on Nov 10, 2008 9:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

but are they available? would they come to Cleveland? Cowher coming back next year to coach makes sense because of his age and the thought that he would get back into it after a couple years away. Cowher also has very strong ties to our city and our team.

There sure are plenty of coaches out there, but none have been brought up that make as much sense and would be a sure of thing as Cowher.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 11, 2008 12:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s my point though, Cowher is not a sure thing. He was great for 2/14 years in pittsburgh, surrounded by great talent in an organization that has arguably the longest winning tradition in all of football. He was OK-to-good 12/14 years.

He went 8-8 in his last year…how much more talent was on that steelers team than is on our team now? No one is talking about how he won the Super Bowl one year and then didn’t even make the playoffs the next.

He would probably be an improvement over Romeo, I’ll give the pro-Cowhers that. But he isn’t a coaching god. If there is one thing I know about football, it is that stats almost never tell the whole story. Wanting a coaching change is much more agreeable than wanting a change to one specific guy.

What is it about Cowher specifically that is going to make Wimbley start getting to the QB, Jackson start making big hits behind the line of scrimmage, and Braylon actually catch the ball? What does he alone do that no one else does that will help these problems? Does he growl differently? Sure he comes off as a hard ass, but there are tons of coaches out there that do.

I also don’t see how his age factors in to it. He is a little old, but not too old. He’s already retired once. If he comes in and demands the GM job, new offensive schemes, and putting in the LeBeau zone-blitz D, it is probably going to take a while to get things how he wants them. How many years is he prepared to coach?

Anyone who we threw enough money at would come to coach here. There is talent on the roster and the city worships the Browns. We as fans have no where close to enough access to answer the key questions about how the potential new coach should be. There are plenty of guys who make sense.

by rufio on Nov 11, 2008 1:56 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I think this is right on the money. Also, I fear the autocratic head-coach-as-GM model. Savage has done a good job – the Browns just haven’t hit critical mass just yet.

by joeee on Nov 11, 2008 1:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sustained success for 15 years is perhaps the best evidence of Cowher having something that no other available coaching prospect has. When 12 of 15 seasons are .500 or better, that means constant competitiveness. He got to 6 AFC championship games over those 15 years. Made the playoffs 10 of those years. That type of percentage is almost unheard of.

What is he going to do? Maybe it is yelling a little louder and more often. Maybe its a stronger personality. Maybe its being a better manager of in game situations and a better manager of 53 personalities. Maybe its being a better motivator. Maybe its being more organized. I don’t know all of the qualities of being a good NFL head coach is, but Bill Cowher, more than any other individual currently available, almost certainly has these qualities.

The Steelers were a good team before Cowher (although they were terribly mediocre during Knoll’s last 10 years or so), and they, so far, are a good team after him. But that doesn’t take away the consistent competitive and often championship caliber level that the franchise was at with him as the head coach.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 11, 2008 2:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well said.

Thanks, very well stated.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 11, 2008 4:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Prove to me that it was Cowher, and not the rest of the steelers’ organization who should take credit for the success of the team during his tenure.

Plugging Cowher or any other coach in does not instantaneously put an NFL team at .500 or better every year, period. It can help, sure, but it is never guaranteed. He has experience winning, but what impact did he have on winning? That’s the question we need to consider. How is he going to help us win? Sure, he did great in one situation, how is he going to do here?

Sure, he played a part. Explain to me exactly—or even vaguely—what that part was. Yelling louder does not correlate with being a better coach, I am sorry. Yes, it would be refreshing to see some emotion from our HC, but if yelling was all it took to make a great HC, I could do the job. Jon Gruden is ruthless and yelling and snarling all the time. Tony Dungy is quiet and even tempered. Who has had the better record recently?

I highly doubt that you, anyone here, or anyone creating a website to land Cowher has done the necessary legwork to find out who out of the countless possibilities out there is the best manager of 53 personalities, more organized, or a better motivator. How do you know that he, specifically is better at all of those things than, say, Spagnulo? How can you tell me one specific guy is the best candidate for the job when you don’t even know the criteria upon which you are judging these guys?

And do you really think people like Grock were going to be happy if the Browns were .500 this year? What if they win the superbowl and then fail to make the playoffs the next year? What if they go 15-1 and lose in the Division round? Do you think these same people won’t be calling for heads?

by rufio on Nov 11, 2008 7:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i couldn’t agree with Dogg more. well said.

rufio, prove to me that it wasn’t cowher who should take the credit. your statement is ridiculous. an impossible proof.

i’ll tell you some of the ways that i, as a fan, think cowher was responsible for the steelers’ success and would be better for the browns than crennel or anyone else:
- instilling a culture of discipline and accountability among the players
- surrounding himself with talented and capable coaches coordinators
- showing genuine passion and dedication—for cowher this is manifested in spitting all over his massive chin. dungy’s is different, but make no mistake that it’s there
- being successful…success breeds success, my friends. you think that new steelers didn’t respect cowher immediately upon hitting the locker room b/c of his record? he’s instant credibility in the locker room b/c of Dogg’s list above
- his reputation as the hardest worker out there. he doesn’t rest until the job is done.

maybe steve spag will have more success as a head coach than cowher did, but i’d rather go with the devil we know than the devil we don’t.

finally, it really bugs me when people say “no one here is qualified” to do X, Y or Z for a pro football team. no sh*t. that’s a given. otherwise we’d be working for a football team. we come here as fans to knock ideas around. at least i do.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 11, 2008 8:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How do you know Cowher has more “passion and dedication” for his job that Crennel (or any other coach)? Because he spits on his chin and yells a lot? You just said that Dungy doesn’t do that but he also shows passion and dedication. How does one do that — by winning? If someone wins more that means they care more?

It really bothers me when fans say things like this. You can say that Crennel’s a bad coach, or he makes bad decisions, or he doesn’t play the right people, but how can you question his passion for the game or dedication to the team? You’re far from the only person to say things like this, it happens all the time about athletes and coaches. How does a fan watching a game claim to know how much that person cares about the winning?

I’m not saying that Cowher doesn’t have a passion for the game or dedication to winning, I’m just wondering how you know that he has those qualities more than other coaches.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 11, 2008 8:25 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

it’s a very fair point, brad. i certainly haven’t been in any locker room with romeo or cowher, and i’m not in much of a position to question passion. so perhaps i should remove the “passion” part of my comment. however, i was equating that with “dedication”, about which i have read and heard from “people who know things” that cowher’s dedication is legendary. at the facility working, watching film, grilling players and coaches, working out himself at all hours…and outdoing most other coaches on all those fronts. that’s my basis for that comment.

in my opinion, cowher’s passion spills out on the field, i’ve read and heard that dungy’s passion is reflected in the seriousness with which he prepares himself and his players. what i know of romeo is that he comports himself in neither of those ways, and is much more reserved and low-key. not saying that he’s less passionate, maybe just less skilled at imparting that onto his players.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 11, 2008 8:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hearing second or third hand is even less factual than watching video footage. You claim to “know” things just because other people told you? I am not buying it.

by rufio on Nov 12, 2008 1:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

show me the available video footage of cowher’s time at the facility, etc., and i’ll gladly take a look. sometimes you have to rely on hearsay…this is not a court of law.

you don’t have to buy it from me. i’m pretty comfortable that the people i talk to are well-versed in this stuff. you, however, might take it upon yourself to do a little bit of research, reading and critical thinking about cowher.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 12, 2008 1:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

and let me also say that i think Cowher’s firebrand style of motivation and exhibiting his passion would be perfect for the Browns. absolutely perfect. they don’t seem to respond to romeo’s docile approach. if nothing else, the change of pace would be good for this team.

for those of you who want to keep savage alongside cowher, though, this discussion is moot. savage will never cede control, and cowher will never take a job without control.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 11, 2008 8:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am purposefully avoiding the passion/dedication conversation. But I will say that DCMJoey made a good point here at the end: a change of pace. A new voice seems to do a lot in the lockerroom, at least for the short term. I don’t think that should be underestimated.

I’ll also say this about Cowher. One of the things that impresses me the most is his call for accountability. When he is spitting in someone’s face for making a bone head play, he isn’t just grunting. NFL films had a nice piece on him a couple years ago, and what he is usually saying to the guy who just muffed a punt or the guy with that ruined a play because of an unecessary block in the back was something like “DAMMIT, [PLAYER], YOU OWE ME ONE NOW! YOU OWE IT TO ME”. Being NFL films, of course, they would cut to later in the game when the player did something great and Cowher would get in his face and pump him up more saying “THATS WHAT I’M F****** TALKING ABOUT”. Its accountability.

I don’t claim to know that Crennel doesn’t hold his players accountable. But I don’t think it would be left to Jamal Lewis or Josh Cribbs to tell people not to quit if Bill Cowher was the coach.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 12, 2008 11:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is a much more reasonable argument than joey’s

by rufio on Nov 12, 2008 1:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i believe i said the exact same thing, and that Dogg is agreeing with me in this “much more reasonable argument”, but i appreciate the vote of confidence from the guy who wants us to prove the exact amount of cowher’s influence on the steelers during his tenure there…

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 12, 2008 1:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

funny how we agree here and can’t see be at eachother’s throat in the draft discussion? cheers to good football discourse.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 12, 2008 1:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ha, that was supposed to say either “can’t see eye to eye” OR “be at eachother’s throat”.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 12, 2008 1:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i was thinking the same. i love a good sports debate, as i can tell you do, too!

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 12, 2008 1:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You asked how we know whether Cowher has more passion than RC. I will tell you. We see it as a reflection of the players’ desire on the field. We see it as our players react to success and disappointment on the field. An effective head coach’s attitude is contagious to his players. RC may have passion, but he cannot get his players to share that passion. And that’s all that matters because the coach can’t make the plays. So, if he cannot transfer his desire to the players, his desire doesn’t benefit the team. And it has nothing to do with spitting or yelling, but it’s real.

by elsandito on Nov 11, 2008 11:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How can you say the players have no desire? Because they are playing badly?

by fwembt on Nov 11, 2008 11:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t say the players have zero desire. It’s a question of how much desire and desire for what? You don’t see Patriots, Colts or Steelers players involved in extended celebratory self congratulatory gyrations when they make a great play while their team is 10 pts down. The desire is about winning, not about looking good. You don’t see a Santonio Holmes pointing to his arm and making chest pounding gestures toward a DB just because he converted a first down. Santonio and his teammates have been made to realize it’s about team first. It’s about winning first and it’s about the desire to win. Making the plays is just about the business of getting the win. There’s plenty of time to congratulate oneself when the clock on the field shows zero time left. It’s also about reading body language. Observe Browns players on the sideline after they score or give up a score. Compare that to the body language of, say, the Steelers’ bench under the same circumstances. These differences aren’t occuring in a vacuum. It’s the head coach’s job to get players’ heads on straight.

by elsandito on Nov 12, 2008 8:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, I have seen Santonio Holmes do that. I’ve also seen him do the Soulja Boy over a fallen opponent after he had scored. Poor example. The stuff you talk about is endemic in the NFL. Absolutely the Patriots, Colts, Giants and countless other teams indulge in it. It’s a reflection on the players, not the coaching.

As for the body language, it’s really hard to say. It’s not the head coach’s job to make sure that Brandon McDonald doesn’t look sad after he gets torched. Do we want someone more demonstrative? Apparently. But RAC, by all accounts, has the respect of the players. Does that not count for anything?

The problem here is a lack of talent, not a lack of heart. Beyond Edwards, Cribbs and Winslow, who do we have that is even above-average?

by fwembt on Nov 12, 2008 11:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rogers, Steinbach, Thomas, Pool, Wright, Harrison, Quinn so far (which admittedly is horribly little), Stallworth when he plays, Dawson, Tucker.

Celebration is all over the NFL, coaches with different styles, teams at different talent levels, players of all skill levels, agreed.

by rufio on Nov 13, 2008 1:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rogers, how did I forget him? I can give you Steinbach but you really think the rest of those guys are above-average NFL players?

Don’t get me wrong, I can’t stand the celebrating after every tackle either.

by fwembt on Nov 13, 2008 9:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Those guys are definitely above average

by Roger Dorn on Nov 13, 2008 9:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pool and Wright? How do you figure they are above NFL average? I certainly hope they will be in couple years but they aren’t now. Thomas might be, Steinbach is when fully healthy, there is no way Stallworth is better than average, Quinn has played one decent game, Dawson probably is, Tucker is not.

by fwembt on Nov 13, 2008 8:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think you are talking about the average NFL starter whereas I am talking about the average NFL player at his position. If you think Thomas is borderline, I want some of your drugs

by Roger Dorn on Nov 13, 2008 8:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That could be the case. Still, we don’t have a lot of talent on this team. Even being extremely generous and allowing for all of your “above average” players we have 12 on a roster of 53. No coach is winning with that.

by fwembt on Nov 13, 2008 9:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

this team was a nipple hair from the playoffs last year and sent 6 guys to the pro bowl. NO coach is winning with this team?

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 13, 2008 9:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re right, Romeo is a playoff-calibre coach who just missed last year.

Look, everything broke perfectly last year and we played a laughably simple schedule with minimal injuries. This year we are playing real competition and it is painfully obvious that we don’t have the talent (maybe not on the sideline either) to compete.

Again, look at our roster and pick the guys who are above average at their position. Even being insanely generous you can only get 12. That’s not getting you to the playoffs. Especially when that is the most optimisic assessment possible.

by fwembt on Nov 14, 2008 12:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There are 22 positions if we aren’t counting special teams. If we are, you throw in Cribbs and Dawson.

If there are 32 NFL teams, with 22 starters each, that means there are only 15 “above average” players in the league per position (32/2=16 minus 1 “average” player), meaning there is an average of 10.3 “above average” players per team.

by rufio on Nov 14, 2008 2:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Except we are counting entire rosters, not just starters. This hugely inflates the number of above average players and yet Roger Dorn can still only come up with a very debatable 12.

by fwembt on Nov 14, 2008 3:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t recall picking out 12 players, I was just pointing out which players I agreed were above average

by Roger Dorn on Nov 14, 2008 4:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

hey, if you’re not lucky in the NFL then you’re picking in the top-10. let’s not pretend that 18-1 happens b/c it’s planned out meticulously.

just so i’m clear…this talent-deprived roster couldn’t possibly go to the playoffs with jeff fisher at the helm? tom coughlin? bill belichick? please. and how many above average players would you feel comfortable with?

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 14, 2008 3:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You can’t have it both ways. Either Romeo is good enough to get us to 10-6 or he isn’t. Which is it? If it is his fault this year then he deserves the lion’s share of the credit for last year. If we did that last year in spite of him, then this year isn’t his fault.

So which is it?

by fwembt on Nov 14, 2008 3:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here’s how we can have it both ways. Romeo isn’t a very good coach and we don’t have nearly the talent to be a playoff team. In 2007, we barely edged a bunch of bad teams with DA, a qb whom other teams didn’t yet know his habits. And some here have said we were pretty lucky with injuries. Getting to the playoffs and beating a playoff caliber team are two very different things.

by elsandito on Nov 14, 2008 3:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with the last statement there, absolutely.

I think we have the talent to get in the playoffs every now and then if you froze our roster this year and played this season over and over with the players never aging.

We don’t yet have the talent to get to the playoffs consistently and set our goals higher than making it in, regardless of coach.

Romeo isn’t the best coach in the league, but he isn’t the worst either. I don’t think he is going to be around regardless of how good he actually is.

by rufio on Nov 15, 2008 3:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

schedule. schedule. luck. schedule. injuries. schedule.

That is the difference between last year and this year. We had a soft schedule last year and a really tough schedule this year.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 15, 2008 1:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Harrison probably not actually, but the rest. If you think talent is the problem over coaching, then I disagree with you fully

by Roger Dorn on Nov 13, 2008 9:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Joe Thomas definitely is. I was counting Harrison as a small, change of pace back, not just a RB.

I can think of Sproles and Chris Johnson as being better. Who am I leaving out?

by rufio on Nov 13, 2008 9:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In that case I agree, but we need to use him more!

by Roger Dorn on Nov 13, 2008 10:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Chris Johnson is an every down back and Harrison has touched the ball 24 times this year. To call him above average in anything yet is absurd. SSS to the extreme. Even Sproles, behind LT, has touched the ball twice as many times. Even if coaching is an issue, there is not a world of talent here.

by fwembt on Nov 13, 2008 8:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You can’t measure talent by touches. That’s just poor debating. Its not his fault he isn’t playing more, he makes a play every time he touches the rock!

You can name two guys dubbed as “change of pace” backs (even though you say Johnson is an every down back, I will still spot you him) who I’ll admit are better than Harrison.

So you have 14 more guys to name as change of pace backs who are better than Harrison to push him back down to “average”.

by rufio on Nov 14, 2008 2:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He is a running back. There is no such position of change of pace back. If you are to the point where you want to pick and choose a select few players to compare Harrison too, then you have the debating problem.

In the NFL, amongst running backs, Harrison is not above average. He is average. We can’t really know because he has only tocuhed the ball 24 times this year and he has no track record on which we can fall. It’s an absurdly small sample size to be using to try to defend him as an above average player. He isn’t, not yet.

by fwembt on Nov 14, 2008 3:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Against all RBs, I agree; average.

But you can’t honestly argue that there isn’t (let alone should be) a category with 3rd down back/scat back/change of pace.

H-back isn’t a “real” position either, but just because a guy is unique doesn’t mean he is below average. A guy like Chris Cooley might be an average TE, but he isn’t really a TE, and he IS a skilled and useful player more importantly. Harrison is skilled and useful—maybe I don’t even care about average/above average.

I am not the only one who thinks there is more than 1 RB position. Madden includes 3rd down back as a position, and while it isn’t a replication of reality, it does show the convention of having a 3rd down/change of pace guy.

by rufio on Nov 15, 2008 3:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Man, Wright is easily above average. Thomas is a top 5 LT right now. This team has a lot of talent. Enough that we should expect the Super Bowl? no. But enough that we should be more than competitive every week and enough to be .500 against a tough schedule and have double digit wins against an easy schedule. We just barely did that last year and we are failing this year. It is on the coaching. I love our O-line. I love our TEs. I like our mix of x-factors on offense like Cribbs and Harrison. I really like our new D-Line and think they’ll be ok. I love Wright and think that we are some depth away from having a strong secondary. Besides a new RB and a new LB core, we have the talent.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 14, 2008 10:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This team is talented. I don’t understand the other side of the debate. We are a few pieces and a competent coach away from contending in the playoffs

by Roger Dorn on Nov 14, 2008 2:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Romeo coached us to within a bad call of the playoffs last year, remember? The only thing that has changed this year is the level of competition and we are being exposed as simply not there yet.

How you can look at 3-6 and see a team loaded with above average players is beyond me. Crennel puts the players in position to make plays. McDonald has been awful for two weeks and he is getting removed. The scheming has our players in position to make tackles and they are missing them. You yourself suggested that not a single one of our linebackers should be out there “LB: they suck. Fire them. All of them.” Is that Romeo’s fault?

Is it Romeo’s fault that Edwards can’t catch? The right call was made to get him the ball and he dropped it. Maybe Romeo should jog alongside him shouting encouragment? Maybe Romeo should block for Jamal Lewis, after all, he’s big enough to make a hole.

You look at us and see a team that has the talent and is missing the coaching that was apparently there a year ago. I see a team with the same coach that doesn’t have the talent to play with teams like the Ravens, Steelers or Cowboys. Can Jeff Fisher with a running back that can’t run, a number one wideout that has forgotten how to catch, a number two corner that can’t cover, safeties that can’t stay healthy, a quarterback with one game under his belt and Syndric Steptoe? No.

by fwembt on Nov 14, 2008 3:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We have been competitive in all but 2 games, and have led in games we should have won against strong teams. I would say we haven’t been exposed, except for maybe a team that can’t close the deal. We are capable of beating very good teams

by Roger Dorn on Nov 14, 2008 4:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i think i’ve gotten myself lost in all of this…fwembt, are you arguing for keeping romeo but dumping savage?

we beat the defending champs resoundingly (their only loss); we gave up double digit leads in the second half in 2 straight games, wins in which would have us in the thick of the playoff race. i find it hard to accept that this team doesn’t have the talent and skill level to reach the playoffs. but this argument comes down to one thing: i believe that certain coaches can extract more from players than other coaches are able to. if you don’t then there will be no resolution to this thread. i think romeo is incapable of coaxing the players into winning the last two games—i think cowher, fisher, coughlin, belichick, dungy all would have delivered 2 victories.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 14, 2008 4:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is an incredibly difficult topic. Cowher, Fisher, Coughlin, Belichick, Dungy all sure as hell seem like they would have delivered two victories, don’t they?

Or are you just saying that.

Pittsburgh of three years ago, Titans, Giants, Pats, Colts all are kick ass teams. We just simply cannot know that it was coach “willing” them to victory. I agree with fwembt here – he makes a strong case. I don’t like Crennel, but he didn’t get burned by Brandon Marshall and Eddie Royal.

by joeee on Nov 14, 2008 5:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

of course i’m just saying that. how could i possibly know for sure? that’s why i said “i think”.

crennell may not have been burned by marshall or royal, but he (and/or tucker) certainly put mcdonald in a position to be burned. scheme can make up for a lot…or it can cost you a lot.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 15, 2008 3:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The difference between 3-6 and 5-4, maybe even 7-2 is coaching. This year. We have had botched clock management, a QB switch 4 games too late, a disfunctional locker room, a lack of in-game adjustments, and odd stubborness.

A good coaching staff and we win against Denver and Baltimore. We have a better chance of winning against Pittsburgh and Baltimore the first time.

We have talent on both lines and many skill positions. We have talent, yet no depth at DB.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 15, 2008 1:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So….a team like the Colts who isn’t playing too well right now is devoid of talent?

by rufio on Nov 15, 2008 3:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How about open accusations that players are quitting during the game? How about lack of focus and discipline that has been evident all season (specific games include Pitt, Wash, 2nd Balt game, and Denver.)

by Roger Dorn on Nov 12, 2008 3:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Lewis comments really is an indirect indictment of the coaching staff. And its those comments that tell me we are past discussing IF Crennel is coming back and need to start thinking of who will replace him.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 12, 2008 3:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It looked to me like Lewis quit just as much as anyone else. 19 carries for 60 yards?

by fwembt on Nov 12, 2008 11:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Lack of ability is not the same as quitting. Also, he didn’t get a lot of touches, but that, in my opinion, is a good thing.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 13, 2008 10:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Mine too. I was mostly just being bitter.

by fwembt on Nov 13, 2008 8:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with the first part; Crennel pseudo-fired-back at Lewis by saying he didn’t believe anyone quit. Defensive?

by rufio on Nov 13, 2008 1:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How do you measure focus? As for discipline, we are 13th in the league in penalties. That is behind those fantastically coached Steelers and Ravens. What do you want the coach to do? This isn’t baseball where he can go to the bullpen or something like that. he runs the best lineup he has out there and then relies on the coordinators to get the job done. We just aren’t a very good team, that isn’t Romeo’s fault. The players need to answer for their lack of production before he does.

by fwembt on Nov 12, 2008 11:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not going to base penalties off of how I determine how the coach is doing. We blew two late large leads. Our playcalling has been questionable at important times. We have players openly questioning each other whether or not they are quitting during games. There has been a lot of speculation as to whether or not we are putting our best lineup on the field. These are all coaching correctable.

How can we possibly allow single coverage to allow a game-altering touchdown 2 weeks in a row with no safety help. The Derrick Mason TD and the Eddie Royal TDs are both examples of how a better scheme when you are sitting on a 13 or 14 pt lead probably would have helped prevent a blown coverage TD. I could go on and on about moves I have questioned this year, which doesn’t even get into clock management (huge issues in the Pitt and Wash games.)

by Roger Dorn on Nov 13, 2008 9:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A coach in football has way more to do with a team’s success than a manager in baseball.

Has he run the best lineup out there? I’d say there are very questionable calls as to playing time at QB and RB. He is about to make a change at CB. To say nothing of poor schemes.

Cutler was on the radio this week saying that when they went to the 5 wide in the 2nd half the browns had no response, they simply played their tampa 2 and it was relatively easy to pick us apart, we made no adjustments. That’s on the coaching staff. And romeo is the head of that staff.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 13, 2008 10:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think your last sentence is the most compelling argument that has been made against Romeo.

by fwembt on Nov 13, 2008 8:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No one here is qualified, which is why we should knock ideas around i.e. “Hey Bill Cowher could be our guy, he won a Super Bowl”, not confess with undying passion why we KNOW this one specific guy is going to save our team.

Cowher could be the guy, sure. People want Romeo fired, ok. So why not try to come up with more than one guy as a possibility to replace him instead of following the talking heads on ESPN’s gossip lines? That’s that I am here for, talking about football on a more intelligent level than ESPN.

by rufio on Nov 12, 2008 1:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t really agree with this line of thinking. To me it is not that difficult to judge great coaches in the NFL. Sometimes guys are put in the wrong circumstances and can’t overcome a lack of talent. Right now the Browns have talent, and are underperforming.

I could point to Jeff Fisher and say that if we had him at coach, our team would be better off in the long run. Using your argument you would respond and say I am not qualified to know that Jeff Fisher is a great coach. I disagree, any team should immediately hope for someone like Jeff Fisher as their coach. Same goes for Cowher, same goes for Marty Schottenheimer amongst available coaches.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 12, 2008 3:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, using my logic you could not say that Jeff Fisher is THE ONLY guy who should be coaching your team, and THE ONLY guy anyone should want. You can’t honestly say Cowher is the only guy anyone should want to coach the Browns; in fact you seem to say Marty would be a good choice.

He can be someone you want coaching your team. He can be qualified as a “great” coach. But bringing in even the best of coaches does not guarantee success, even with what appears to be a talented team.

Sometimes it just doesn’t work.

by rufio on Nov 13, 2008 1:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There has not been one point where I have said Cowher is the only guy. He is a great candidate though and his track record supports that notion

by Roger Dorn on Nov 13, 2008 9:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I never said you, specifically, did. Did I? I did not mean to say that.

I meant to say simply that he is not nor should he be the only guy who anyone should want.

by rufio on Nov 13, 2008 9:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree completely. If it’s an option, we should look at him though

by Roger Dorn on Nov 13, 2008 10:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You are right, the criteria on judging coaches is out of my grasp. But really, I think its out of your grasp too. Probably even out of Phil Savage’s grasp. Randy Lerner probably falls closer to you or me than Phil Savage. Is anyone able to judge Cowher vs. Spagnulo fairly? I don’t know. I DO know that, whatever the criteria is, Cowher has more to show us as evidence that he has it than Spagnulo or anyone else available.

How much credit should he take vs. the Steelers organization? Well put it this way: In his first 6 years, Cowher won an average of 11 games, made the playoffs every year, got to 3 AFC Championship games and a Super Bowl. In the 6 years before Cowher, the Steelers won 6, 8, 5, 9, 7, and 7 games respectively, making the playoffs once.

The Browns wins over the last 6 years: 5, 4, 6, 4, 10, ?

He didn’t take over some super power in Pittsburgh. He took over a mediocre to bad team from. Were the 1992 Steelers in better shape than the 2009 Browns will be? If they were, its not by much.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 12, 2008 11:13 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am saying it is out of my grasp!!!! That was my whole point in saying that. I think Cowher should be on the short list of guys they look at purely based on their resume, which is public. Why we are having websites and threads dedicated to specifically Bill Cowher when we have no ground to stand on that we should be the ones making the decision is absurd. It should be “fire Romeo” if you want a coaching change, not “Hire X”.

I just don’t think he should automatically be anointed the next guy because of what he has done. Its about what he will do, right? I, nor anyone else here is qualified to say what he will do. I said “I am not sold” on him being the guy for sure. I have no reason to believe that plugging him—specifically him—in as HC will fix everything moreso than a similar “change of pace” guy. I am perfectly content to let Savage/whoever make that decision because they have all of the information.

Giving statistics—even the most important statistics, Ws—does not PROVE anything, even with a before and after. That’s not even sociology-level science. Cheaticheck coached here and did a fairly mediocre job record-wise, right? So what turned him in to a genius when he left? How is everyone toting this as a sure thing so sure that won’t happen in reverse with Cowher coming here? Romeo seemed to have a pretty solid record in NE, and here he is struggling. I think even “the most sure thing” is no where close to “a sure thing”.

Maybe a new coach will be able to create a similar turnaround here, that seems plausible because we are talented. I sure hope it happens.

by rufio on Nov 12, 2008 1:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We don’t really disagree much. I voted for the yes, but don’t want to lose Savage choice. Of course there needs to be an interview process. Of course there is a variety of guys out there that should be considered.

I get excited about Cowher because it makes so much sense. It is a big name, the best resume out there, and, perhaps most interesting to me, a connection to Cleveland and the Browns. I don’t think this can be understated. He has a reason to want to coach here. There is a decent chance that he would actually chose Cleveland over other contenders, from what we know. He has been rumored for this job at least 3 times before (91, 99, 07).

I agree, “the most sure thing” is not the same as “a sure thing”, but it is certainly a huge plus. Does his turnaround of a mediocre to bad Pittsburgh team followed by 15 years or competitive success PROVE that he could turn our team around? No. But I don’t see what is so wrong about discussing the most qualified and most compelling choice that has been rumored by people with that have knowledge of the principals, of the game, of NFL coaching, to be a possibility for the job.

We do want a new coach. Fire Crennel would be a decent topic. Except that it would be pretty short. I don’t think many fans or posters are really arguing that he should stay, am I wrong? Crennel’s seat is more than hot. He will almost certainly not survive the off season without a 5-2 finish, and looking at our schedule and how we’ve played, its just hard to see. Maybe this discussion is skipping a step, but its a step that most fans have mentally already made.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 12, 2008 1:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Also as fans posting on the internet, if we avoid discussing topics where we aren’t qualified to speak, then this website would have 0 user comments. We can discuss coaching candidates based on track record. Take it with a grain of salt because we are anonymous internet posters, but it’s not unreasonable for people to speculate and weigh the merits of bringing in Bill Cowher or someone else

by Roger Dorn on Nov 12, 2008 3:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If you want to steal opponents coaches maybe you should try and get Rex Ryan. The Ravens defense has been good for years so he can obviously build something.

by archon095 on Nov 10, 2008 2:07 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

and that worked so well with Marvin Lewis.

You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on Nov 10, 2008 2:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

First, anecdotal evidence of this happening is not the same as a case study. There is no causality in the fact that Lewis was the Ravens’ DC before he became the (thus far pretty bad) HC at Cincy.

Second, Cincinnati also gave Lewis the power to draft some guys like Odell Thurman and Chris Henry if I am not mistaken. Pollock could have been good but suffered an unfortunate injury. NFL coaches should never be given anything more than influence and input into the drafting process, period. That team was also a joke before he took over and did substantially better after he was there for a while.

by rufio on Nov 11, 2008 2:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cowher in ’09, playoffs by 2013. Count me out for another rebuliding.

by fwembt on Nov 10, 2008 5:12 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I get this sentiment, but what is the alternative? Romeo? Chud? Its not like you are going to get someone from out of the organization with much skill as a coach who would be willing not to change some things.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 10, 2008 7:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Seconded. I don’t like the idea of rebuilding any more than you, fwembt, but what is the other option? It’s painful to watch this team win right now, let alone the losses.

by NickFantana on Nov 21, 2008 2:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Because he has history playing in Cleveland, and he knows how to win. That’s not something we’re used to seeing. Give him a stake in the team if he can deliver a championship. Move his damn house there on the back of a truck if you have to.

Don’t make him GM though. That never seems to work out. cough BITCH DAVIS cough Naturally, he’d have some voice in the personnel decision making process, but don’t make him a tyrant, at least in the beginning.

Bill Cowher = victory

by ouched on Nov 10, 2008 7:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I want Cowher, I want a winner. This team has talent. I believe Cowher gives this city, this team the best chance to succed. I honestly feel taking the hot, young assistant is a crap shoot. As mentioned above, " Hey I want that young, energenic assistant, but I don’t know who that is". My point exactly, who is out there?

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 10, 2008 8:30 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

-Every QB coach and OC in a good offense. Jim Zorn was a QB coach. Tony Sporano was an offensive line coach before he became head coach of the Dolphins, so I guess that opens all of them up too. Anyone with bloodlines or coaching experience with a good offensive mind/head coach.
Examples: Brian Schottenheimer, OC, Jets. Mike Martz, OC, 49ers. Marty Mornhinweg, OC, PHI. Doug Marrone, OC, Saints. Whoever the coordinator of New England is. GB, and DEN’s OCs.

-Any DC in a good defense. Probably big-name LB coaches, DL coaches, and secondary coaches, too. Same things about bloodlines and experience. Anyone in the Belliceck and/or Parcells coaching tree. Examples: Steve Spagnulo, DC, NYG. Rex Ryan, DC, BAL. Gregg WIlliams, DC, JAX. Perry Fewell, DC, Bills. Whoever the NE coordinator is.

-Every college coach whose team is/has overachieved and doesn’t run a bunch of gimmicky crap offense, or whose specialty is defense. Kirk Ferentz, Iowa, Pete Carrol, USC, Jim Tressel, OSU, Bob Stoops, OAK…

-Other “retired” coaches who might come out of retirement. Bill Parcells…

by rufio on Nov 11, 2008 2:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps we have not provided enough detail in representing “Recruit Cowher” group? We understand the benefits of hiring a talented pro coordinator or successful college coach. We see other teams rolling 7s with someone like Jim Zorn. But this strategy has spawned Palmer, Davis and Crennel for us, snake eyes 3 times.
We just need a guy who we know won’t suck because Savage will do the rest. Savage will, given time, provide a guy like Cowher, who just happens to be available, enough talent to coach. It’s not that Cowher is so great, it’s that he’s low risk to be adequate and he’s available.

by elsandito on Nov 11, 2008 8:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

All the above

does not have the resume that Cowher has. As stated above by Dayton Dogg, 6 AFC championship games out of 15 seasons of coaching. That my friend is succesful.
 I mean Kirk Ferentz? Anyone in the Bellicheck tree, UH, Romeo and Charlie Weis are tearing up. I will give you Mangeni of the Jets. Parcells is not leaving Miami he is done.Bob Stoops, no thanks, I follow the Sooners, great college guy.

 So in summary you believe anyone is more qualified than Bill Cowher, sounds a little personal there Rufio? Maybe it is he kicked our Browns ass forever and ever.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 11, 2008 4:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I never said these guys were more qualified. Do not put words in my mouth. If you thought I said that, that’s just downright bad reading comprehension. You asked what the other options were. I told you.

My point is that we as people sitting here talking about this on the internet have ZERO room to think that we should be the ones making this decision—if it is in fact going to be made. I have no idea if Cowher wants to coach, or would coach for the right dollar amount but doesn’t really have his heart in it, or if there is someone else we should tag as the guy. Hell, Lerner and Savage would at least have to do some interviews before hiring a guy, why does anyone in their right mind think we as fans can just scoop a guy up and know for sure he is the right choice?

You asked “who is out there”, I gave you some examples. That’s not the same question as “who do you think should be the guy?”. Ya dig?

by rufio on Nov 11, 2008 7:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

a good list, rufio, as far as the options available. i would add one big name that you’ve left off, though…Jason Garrett, DAL OC, and Cleveland guy. he could be hard to wrest away from J. Jones, but we should certainly look at him.

in my humble opinion, though, the list above begins and ends with Garrett and Spagnuolo. Many of the rest are retreads (e.g. Martz, G. Williams), too young (Josh McDaniel, NE OC), or just “huh?” (Marrone, Fewell) names. i’m also vehemently opposed to successful college coaches, as we’ve seen first hand how that goes (Butch)…and need go no farther than Saban, Kiffin, Spurrier, even back to Lou Holtz to see the issues with that. i think we may even qualify for a case study w/ all those names.

for my part, Cowher does more for me than every name on this list. much more. and adding in guys like Jim Fassell and Brian Billick doesn’t move the needle for me at all.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 12, 2008 1:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Before last year, the guy who coaches Atlanta was a no-name guy, too. I hadn’t really heard of Jim Zorn, and he’s doing alright. The Steelers hired Mike Tomlin who was not only a no-name type of guy, but also “too young”. Again, I am not trying to make a case for any of these guys, but I am giving examples of types of people we (and/or the Browns) should be looking at.

Garrett is another person I forgot, correct.

Weren’t there some old 49ers coaches who came from the college ranks and did ok? I think Kiffin never had a shot…it was Oakland. Saban was doing alright before he decided to be a snake. Spurrier and Holtz were not good in the NFL.

by rufio on Nov 12, 2008 1:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you’re right: Mike Smith was a no name (at least to me he was); Zorn had been tagged as “head guy material”, but this seemed to be early; Tomlin was very young, although that is the Steelers’ style; and John Harbaugh came completely out of nowhere. there are plenty of examples of those guys being successful. but for each 1 of those there have to be 4 assistants who were pulled up to the big chair too early, which makes me skeptical of HIRING one of them over a guy like cowher, who has the chops at the helm, in the league. you’re certainly right that we should LOOK at these types, but i think you have to be very careful. and you look at the situations they walked into: Smith, total rebuild; Zorn, talented team, he’s probably overachieving; Tomlin, veteran, talented team; Harbaugh, amazing leadership. my concern is that a guy like that would be overwhelmed w/ the chaos in Berea right now. just my fear…obviously could be totally wrong.

i think that you’re thinking of Steve Mariucci w/ the 9ers maybe? who is actually another example of a poor result from a college guy…and going way back, Walsh had ties to Stanford pre-9ers, but he’d been on Paul Brown’s staff for years and years prior to that.

Kiffin was handcuffed by Davis, to be sure, so maybe we mark that “Incomplete”. as for Saban, i think he was struggling, no? 9-7 and then 6-10, according to wikipedia. in any event, it wasn’t a homerun for the college guys.

overall, my point is that given the Browns’ current situation, i think an experienced guy w/ a record is the right choice…and that leads me to Cowher. doesn’t mean we shouldn’t look at the Garretts of the world, but Cowher’s my guy. will be interesting, though, b/c Cowher means Savage is out.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 12, 2008 1:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

just a question- is it 100% that Cowher and Savage couldn’t co-exist? Or are we just assuming that it would take total control for Cowher to consider coming back to coaching? Would Savage admit some level of defeat and share some power if the alternative is losing his job? For Cowher, or anyone else.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 12, 2008 2:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

for me it’s an assumption, but i think a fair one. i could see cowher having a personnel guy but not a GM, and savage wouldn’t want to take that demotion. on savage’s side, he’ll want to retain all final say over football decisions, which cowher won’t like. job security does do funny things to people, but i think the egos win here.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 12, 2008 2:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am against hiring any coach that would cause Savage unhappiness or insecurity.

by elsandito on Nov 12, 2008 2:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i’d like to hear more on this. people are pretty enamored with savage, and he’s done fine, but why so much faith in him? he’s supposed to be a great judge of college talent, right? by my calculation, and i tried to be liberal, i see 9 of 29 “hits” in his draft record…mediocre, if you ask me.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 12, 2008 3:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

without going into our discussion in the other thread, and without challenging your 9 of 29 number:
What is considered good? 20 of 29? 15 of 29?

by DaytonDogg on Nov 12, 2008 3:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

please, feel free to challenge the 9-for-29, and i realize that there are some “the jury’s still out” on those remaining 20. this guy was supposed to be great at culling talent from college, though, and i don’t think there have been injuries amongst our draftees, so we should be on the same page here.

anyway, “good” would probably be something along the lines of 14 or 15 for 29. here’s how i look at it: on average, an average GM probably hits on the first 3 rounds of each draft. those should be “easy” picks, on the spectrum. obviously, sometimes you whiff on a 3rd rounder and hit on a 6th rounder…but i’d say an average GM goes 3-for-7. so that’s 12-for-28 (savage is at 29 total picks, so close enough). i say good is 14 or 15, b/c good should exceed average, clearly.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 12, 2008 5:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You need to take into account Savage’s success in signing free agents that have helped the Browns. The current state of the Browns is light years away from where we were when Savage arrived. It’s about signing the right guys at the right price, trading the right guys for the right guys AND drafting.

by elsandito on Nov 12, 2008 5:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

agreed. the full picture of a GM is not painted solely by his drafting.

however, i focus on the draft b/c it was said to be his strength, his competitive advantage over the rest of the world. it’s my contention, that with the $$ savage has had to spend under the cap the last few years he has done no better than the average GM. his FA activity, plus his trades, have left us w/ more talent, no question, but also an atrocious linebacking corps, and equally dismal defensive backfield. i know i’m focusing on the negatives, but hey, i’m a browns fan, cut me some slack.

let me also say that i am firmly in the “undecided” camp w/ savage. i’m playing devil’s advocate here a bit, as i totally agree that starting from basically 0 when he started, the talent level of this team is far improved.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 12, 2008 6:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think that Savage has done a better job than average in terms of free agents/trades.

He got one of the two OG’s when 2 potential pro bowlers were in FA, and the other stayed with his original team. He either makes big name splashes at positions where we need it or just roster fluff.

You know what, we need a new thread for this.

Bump.

by rufio on Nov 13, 2008 1:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, but do you have any basis for this? I think you are way underestimating the difficulty of coming up with “hits” (which I’m defining as someone that actually panned out, for the sake of this conversation)

I mean, who can we agree is good at drafting? Tennessee? I looked at their 2004, 05, 06, and ’07 drafts. These should be the main source for building their current undefeated team, right?

Well, defining hits for this exercise, basically as anyone who has been a starter for more than half a season this is what I’ve come up with: 12/44 or 27. Your 9/29 would be 31, pretty darn good by comparison. I went through the Browns 04-07 drafts myself and using the same standard I did for the Titans, I came up with 10/31 (This counts Butch’s last draft and doesn’t count the 08 draft- so I get Winslow and Jones in my equation) for 32%. So, I don’t feel like doing another team, but it sure does seem like he’s done a pretty good job compared to a very solid Titans organization. (Interesting though that they had 13 more draft picks in that 4 year period than us, they had at least 10 picks each year!)

by DaytonDogg on Nov 12, 2008 8:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hitting on the first 3 rounds is hardly a guarantee, especially if you want them all to be monsters. If you are looking at “decent” players, maybe. But a first round guy ending up “decent” is kind of a disappointment, no?

by rufio on Nov 13, 2008 1:15 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Garrett is not an option as he is been named future head coach at Dallas, whenver they give Phillips the boot.

by talonk on Nov 13, 2008 12:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn’t say that makes him “not an option”.

by rufio on Nov 14, 2008 2:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If he has been signed as Assistant Head Coach and will get the reins in Dallas when they let Wade Phillips go (could be this offseason), why on earth would he want to take the Browns job.

Sure he may be an “option” but I’d put that percentage at below 1%.

by talonk on Nov 15, 2008 1:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Money.

Do not underestimate money in the NFL.

by rufio on Nov 15, 2008 3:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If I had to guess, he is already making more money than Romeo is right now (Jones doesn’t mind overspending). Am not sure Lerner would be willing to make Garrett one of the Top 5 head coaches in salary. But it’s just my opinion.

by talonk on Nov 16, 2008 10:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

romeo makes about $4mm, garrett about $3mm.

if randy is convinced that garrett (or anyone else) is the right guy, he definitely won’t let money be an obstacle.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 17, 2008 2:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bringing a coach out of retirement is just as much of a crapshoot. Joe Gibbs was a “proven winner,” wasn’t he?

by joeee on Nov 11, 2008 1:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Essay question: compare and contrast Romeo Crennel (3-6, 4th year) and John Harbaugh (6-3, 1st year).

Who says that you need Cowher to have a winner?

by palcal on Nov 11, 2008 5:01 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Harbaugh inherited a team with one of the best defenses in the NFL and inspired them to play better.

Crennel inherited a team with the lowest talent level in the NFL, and four years later, still has not been given NFL-level talent on the defensive side of the ball. He has gone on to allow the NFL-level talent he does have to play indifferently and without focus.

by woodsmeister on Nov 11, 2008 1:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would argue that Crennel has plenty of talent as his disposal, moreso on offense, but has not instilled the toughness that is necessary for a good defense. This team has played a lot of winnable games that we ended up on the wrong end of

by Roger Dorn on Nov 12, 2008 3:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bottom line

It is truly a crap shoot no matter where you turn. I just think where the Browns are at, they are not far from being a playoff team. I just think you want to go with a more sure thing when they pick there next head coach. The Browns can ill afford to strike out next time.

 HAPPY VETERANS DAY ALL !!!!!!

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 11, 2008 4:50 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Crapshoot > Romeo’s Crap

"...leading the league in most offensive categories. Including nose hairs."

by sarcasmdave on Nov 11, 2008 6:34 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

That would be amazing

I love Cohwer as a coach and I think that would be great for Cleveland and the NFL for him to come back and coach Cleveland. The NFL is better when Cleveland and Pittsburgh are at the top of their games and heated rivals, much like Denver and Oakland. I know Cohwer was a coach in Cleveland before Pittsburgh so it would be great to see the circle completed. Good luck to having him come back.

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum

by Broncoman on Nov 12, 2008 11:40 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

no brainer if you can get him…still knows most players on AFC north. he would be your quickest turn-around coach for sure.

by raven on Nov 15, 2008 5:48 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

Start posting about the Browns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Pryor_small
ESPN reports that Lerner wants Holmgren
Small
An SF Bay Area Sports fan commiserates
Dbn_small
DBN: Help Wanted
Logo_ksu1_small
Second Thing to Be Settled After GM Fiasco
Bernie_small
Ryan for Head Coach
Erie_dawgs_logo_small
Hire mooncamping!
Logo_ksu1_small
Accorsi and Kosar New GMs?
Biggamebob_small
Classless Chickenshirt Move
Jim-tressel-ohio-state_small
Browns Reportedly Fire Kokinis
Small
Maybe this makes sense

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Browns Links


Executive Editor

Dbn_small ChrisPokorny

Minions

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Moderators

Pryor_small Buckeye Brad