Dawgs By Nature: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

Sound Off - Who Do You Hate?

Yes, "hate" is a strong word. This is in a football sense as it relates to the Cleveland Browns, though.

Basically, this is your area to sound off following a pathetic 16-6 loss to the Houston Texans, in an attempt to prevent 50 threads being made about "why Crennel should be fired", "why Savage should be fired", etc.

Feel free to vent here, though I think we can refrain from the already tiresome Phil Savage e-mail jokes. What drove you nuts against the Texans? Romeo Crennel standing there on the sidelines? Thinking that Savage's picks haven't panned out? The constant drops of supposed Pro Bowl receiver Braylon Edwards? The two fumbles by Jamal Lewis? The ever-so-ineffective Andra Davis? I could go on and on, and so can you...so sound off.

0 recs  |  Comment 229 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Braylon Edwards is awful, but I don’t hate him. How could I hate someone so pathetic? He thinks he’s the best ever. This year, he’s been historically bad.

by NickFantana on Nov 23, 2008 5:50 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

“DATS WAT I DOOO! DATS WHAT I DO SON DATS WAAAAT I DOOOOO!!!!”

by mgtbfb on Nov 23, 2008 6:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Umm lets start with the idea of sitting Quinn after two INTs. After watching DA pelt the ground for 7 weeks now we get an itchy trigger finger? I know he was hurt going into the game, but lets see if he could play through it.

And Jamal Lewis needs to sit behing Jerome Harrison. Lets see what we got.

Donte Stallworth has been a gigantic waste of money. If I remember his contract is voidable after this year. Something we could look into.

Our tackling blows. Simple as that. That is coaching and toughness.

Our offense seems to have no ryhme or reason this year. It looks like my little brother’s play calling on Madden.

Anyone else starting to look at draft stuff?

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 23, 2008 5:54 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I was looking at draft stuff 2 weeks ago. Rooting for losses at this point.

by vegasbrown on Nov 23, 2008 7:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve been willing to give Crennel a chance up to this year because they had some rebuilding to do and last year’s finish was surprising. Seemed like they were headed in the right direction.

However, Crennel now needs to go. Yeah, benching Quinn and putting Anderson back in because you have a receiving corps that couldn’t catch a cold let alone a goddamn football. Crennel doesn’t know how to fix things?! How about we teach the goddamn receivers how to catch the ball!

Edwards dropping that touchdown should have been the final straw for him. Quinn was nowhere near as bad as he was made out to be. I don’t care what you’re paying him, bench Edwards and put the second string in, I guarantee he wants it more.

Jamal Lewis is about to get on my last nerve too. How about instead of stutter stepping to a halt behind the line of scrimmage apparently waiting for a hole to open up you actually move FORWARD through the two you already missed. Granted the Browns line isn’t opening up much and he is gaining 3 to 4 yards every few carries, he also misses holes or is slow to them when they do open up. Is it me or does he also go down if the defense so much as breathes in his direction? It’s been a while since I’ve seen him carry or drag a DB very far at all. Harrison shows far more potential.

For the defense, just shoot all of them. Don’t trade them, shoot them so they can’t infect the rest of the league. Can’t stop the run, can’t stop the pass. Am I the only one tired of seeing our corners looking like midgets compared to the receivers they’re covering?

Every time our defense rushes I get the urge to grab the remote to fix the picture because obviously something screwy happened with the DVR feature and it’s dropped the live TV to a slower framerate somehow. Freaking QB could read War and Peace and still have time to throw a pass. Of course with wide open receivers they never need that much time but I’m sure they think it’s nice to have if they want it.

I hate to say it but it could be some of those guys are just looking for a way out of Cleveland figuring if they play bad enough maybe they’ll get traded. That’s the only explanation I can come up with for players that are supposed to be that good playing like steaming piles.

by dmadcat on Nov 24, 2008 11:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Romeo Crennel, Mel Tucker, Andra Davis, Bralon Edwards, Jamal Lewis. These are the goats of the game.

How can we be so incompent???

Who's the best special teamer in NFL history? Josh Cribbs!

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=7249169

by kardiackids2007 on Nov 23, 2008 5:55 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

This performance was so ugly, I watched an old movie with 8 minutes left in the game. Today’s team made last year’s team look like a championship squad. Mario Williams was schooling Thomas, Chud was calling Edwards’ number repeatedly to dare him to catch something, the secondary was as porous as any I’ve seen and KWII was fairly invisible. Maybe this happens against the Colts or Giants, but the Texans?

by elsandito on Nov 23, 2008 6:13 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I don’t hate anyone, however I have had enough of this staff.
 So Quinn struggles and gets the pine, and DA gets 23 games to get his seat on the bench
 This football team for the most part is unprepared, uninspired to play football for the most part every week, excluding JAX and NYG.
 How can a defense get pushed around by Sage Rosenfuells or however you spell his name.
 Winslow has had about what 5 or 6 offensive pass interference calls against him this year.
 Braylon is unmotivated and really could give a crap.
You know the players will say all the correct sound bites " we played hard" just couldn’t punch it in when we got inside the 20" " I take full responsibility" ( and that is not from Braylon), " We need to come out more focused". The whole book of BS sound bites. Bottom line this team lacks direction and leadership. This begins at the top with Lerner. He needs to make his investment accountable, and he is failing.
 This team is a joke, embarassment is to soft of a word for this team.
So what Brown or management personnel says something stupid this week?

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 23, 2008 6:13 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I hate

Romeo and Derek

im not impressed with your performance

by troy145 on Nov 23, 2008 6:23 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Edwards now admits he is playing lousy.

by palcal on Nov 23, 2008 6:27 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I hate the read and (don’t) react vanilla no blitz, no pass rush defensive scheme we insist on running.

I hate that Crennel changes QBs several games too late yet yanks Quinn for one poor half. Is Anderson sucking Crennelephant off in the locker room?

I hate that I puked in my mouth a little bit while watching this game.

I hate that we make Lions and Chiefs fans feel lucky that they don’t live in Cleveland

by mgtbfb on Nov 23, 2008 6:40 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

People that have to go:
Romeo
Andra Davis
Fraley and Hadnot
STALLWORTH
Sean Jones if he thinks he should get paid top money, otherwise keep him
Anderson (we can’t have this potential QB controversy lingering)

Guys earning their salaries:
Phil Dawson
Cribbs
Joe Thomas
Eric Wright
Brodney Pool
Shaun ROGERS
Jerome Harrison

by Roger Dorn on Nov 23, 2008 6:41 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

What are the salary ramifications for parting ways with Stallworth?

by mgtbfb on Nov 23, 2008 6:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My impression was the contract was structured in such a way that we could do what the Pats did and cut him after 1 season with little to no cap hit

by Roger Dorn on Nov 23, 2008 6:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am guessing not good. I am not sure how salary cap things work in trades, especially in the area of signing bonuses versus guaranteed money versus “total salary”.

It makes no sense to let him go if we have him under contract already. You can get up to 5 WRs on the field at the same time, and we can always demote him. He’s not worse than Steptoe or certainly not Sanders.

He isn’t earning his salary, and we shouldn’t waste the cap room if we can sign someone else AND let him go without much of a penalty, but in my understanding it would work against us cap-wise to cut him (worse than actually paying him).

by rufio on Nov 23, 2008 11:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think Fraley or Hadnot is a problem. Losing Stallworth certainly won’t help. Sean Jones should be kept if the deal is reasonable. And if we get rid of Crennel, do we have a QB controversy lingering? I don’t think anyone else thinks that DA should start. And now that we are out of the playoff picture, there is zero reason to play DA. Zero. None. Zip.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 23, 2008 6:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Many times, NFL coaches think that they can suceed with QBs that fail elsewhere. They think “I’m a much better coach than so and so and can coach this guy up”. This holds especially true for guys with big arms.

 I’m hoping that several coaches think this way in regards to DA and overpay for him this off season.

by mgtbfb on Nov 23, 2008 6:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

well sell him as the new steve young

im not impressed with your performance

by troy145 on Nov 23, 2008 7:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Generally, we don’t use the subject line. Just a little FYI.

by fwembt on Nov 23, 2008 9:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How is DA like Steve Young?

Shortish-no
Mobile-no
Smart-not really
Gutsy-not really…

by rufio on Nov 23, 2008 11:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

he was totally average in his first stop

im not impressed with your performance

by troy145 on Nov 24, 2008 3:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

DA is nothing like Steve Young. I will bet you $1000 right now that he never makes it in to the Hall of Fame.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 24, 2008 10:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i agree

everyone missed my point/joke

fail

im not impressed with your performance

by troy145 on Nov 24, 2008 11:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Stallworth is a nice player to have at a reasonable cost. At $5 million a year, I think we can spend that money in a much better place. He has been mostly useless

by Roger Dorn on Nov 23, 2008 6:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The QB switch is inexplicable to me after watching the Quinn press conference, what a dumb move

by Roger Dorn on Nov 23, 2008 6:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t see the press conference — what did he say?

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 23, 2008 7:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Said he didn’t realize he was on such a short leash and that it wasn’t related to his finger

by Roger Dorn on Nov 23, 2008 8:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow they really yanked him because of play?!

by rufio on Nov 23, 2008 11:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Even worse. Quinn also mentioned that he hadn’t been spoken to and had no idea if he would be starting the next game or not

by Roger Dorn on Nov 24, 2008 7:56 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow. That’s a terrible way to run a football team. I don’t like firing a coach in midseason, but Romeo needs to go NOW.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 24, 2008 10:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Benching Quinn is the nail in the coffin for Crennel. What a sign of desperation to go to a guy who is inconsistent, requires time to get into the flow of the game, and proved through 7 games this season he is not the guy for the job. Quinn is our future, Crennel is not.

by dawginphilly on Nov 25, 2008 7:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is just absolute bullshit.

by DisplacedBuckeye on Nov 24, 2008 1:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The defense was pitiful in the first half. Ok in the second.
The offense was ok in the first half. Pitiful in the second.

I’m real mad at Edwards, Lewis, Thomas (worst game as a Brown?), Mel Tucker (how many skinny posts did they hit from the slot? And Sage Rosenfels should never have as good a half as we gave him in the first).

But all this is secondary to Romeo. He has to go. If he is still the coach on Tuesday, I will be surprised and angered. He made a QB change to save his job today. It didn’t work. His leadership is gone. The offense, and particularly Edwards did not give 100% effort. I don’t hate Romeo Crennel. I think he has some strengths. He seems like a good guy. He is NOT a NFL caliber head coach. He must go.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 23, 2008 6:50 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I give Thomas a pass today and feel he is one of the few players currently on the roster that is a legit NFL player and is someone we can build around.

Except for maybe Lewis, everyone else can be cut/fired tomorrow and we would be better for it.

by mgtbfb on Nov 23, 2008 6:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, that doesn’t make any sense at all. There is a bunch of talent on this team. If there wasn’t, this wouldn’t be so frustrating. It would be 1999. That’s not the case now. We have some talent. And we got outplayed by a last place team. We were out-coached, out-prepared, out-efforted, out-everythinged. Do you really think that Houston has more talent than the Browns?? I sure the heck don’t. I think Lewis sucks, personally, but he’s better than he played today. I’m as sick as anyone of Edwards, he’s been dropping easy passes since I first saw him at Michigan- he simply doesn’t have good hands, but he’s better than he played today. And there is no excuse for his lackluster route-running, his lack of focus when the ball was thrown (there were 2 times the ball was thrown to him, and he seemed shocked the ball was there). I’ve seen Joe Thomas dominate some of the best pass rushers in this league, but he played like total shit today. Somehow, a down-to-earth all-pro reduced to a player with no confidence.

This sucks. I really hope Savage doesn’t lose his job. I really hope Romeo has great success somewhere as a D-Coordinator somewhere in the NFC.

Go Browns.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 23, 2008 8:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How are we still clinging to the “bunch of talent” theory? We just are not very good. We cannot catch, block, run, pass or play defense. That’s not indicative of a “bunch of talent.”

by fwembt on Nov 23, 2008 9:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think this is overreacting from one game. There is talent on this team. Go back and watch the Giants game.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 23, 2008 9:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have been saying this for several weeks now. We just aren’t very good.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 12:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Do you really think we are less talented than Houston? Do you honestly believe it was a talent deficit that led to today’s loss

It was focus, it was schemes, it was confidence, it was coaching. The focus and some of the confidence is on the players, sure. But this was a failure of the coaches. We were 4-6 going into this game. Coming off a very close road win against a decent team. And we came out flat, lacked effort and a plan to win. When we fell behind our coach, more than anyone (except maybe Edwards) panicked and changed QBs. There are about 2,000 reasons we lost today. None of it was because we weren’t talented enough.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 23, 2008 10:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We have some talent, especially as compared to the 99 squad. Do you really think the 99 squad has more legit NFL players on it? I don’t even see the argument.

by rufio on Nov 23, 2008 11:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

When did I say the 1999 team had more talent? I am saying that it is getting a bit old to hear that this is all Romeo’s fault (though he surely shares culpability) when our #1 WR can’t catch a pass and neither of our quarterbacks can complete 50% of his passes. That isn’t Romeo, that’s bad players.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 12:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I misread the argument. I would still argue we have a good core of talent. There might be a legit argument that we don’t. I would say we have talent but are playing nowhere close to where we are capable. Braylon, Kellen, Cribbs, Lewis, Thomas, even the rest of the line played really really good football last year, and they aren’t playing that well right now.

by rufio on Nov 24, 2008 12:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think it’s a little early to start degrading Quinn. He’s only played 2 1/2 games. Let’s give him some time.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 24, 2008 10:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ive actually liked what ive seen

lots of potential

im not impressed with your performance

by troy145 on Nov 24, 2008 11:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Coaching has a much bigger impact on player performance than you think. The coach sets the teams tone on the practice field every day. I find it unlikely that all of the players who performed well last year suddenly ALL became bad players.

You should be looking at things and people that effect the entire team….coaching, morale & confidence, etc…Thats whats wrong with this Browns team right now.

by Osiris on Nov 24, 2008 3:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No they ALL suddenly began playing against considerably better teams. It’s not Romeo’s fault that Braylon can’t catch and Lewis can’t run. It is Romeo’s fault that Harrison is misused or not used at all.

And did you forget that the same coach who is such a cancer this year coached these same guys last year?

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 7:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think we all (myself included) over estimated the talent level of this team based on last years unexpected sucess. We’ve been starved for a winner and I think everyone… fans, coaches, media and front office made more out of last year than we should have. Expectations of a deep playoff run were unrealistic as we still had plenty of holes (defense especially) and unsettled positions (questions at QB, WR, Secondary) .

If we draft well, everyone develops as we hope they will and we make the right decision coaching wise I think we can be an elite team in two years. There are some cornerstones here that we can build on but we have a long way to go. Honestly, I see one bonafide franchise player that is still young enough to help us 5 years from now and that’s Joe Thomas. Steinbach and Rodgers are top notch but won’t stay at their current level of play much longer, Winslow is on borrowed time, Edwards is a head case with shattered confidence, and Quinn is unproven.

I guess the best thing that can be done this year would be to give the kids, Bell, Rucker, Quinn, Harrison, Hall, ect… as much playing time as possible. We need to look at the rest of the year as evaluation and find out just what we have.

by mgtbfb on Nov 24, 2008 1:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You really expected an “elite” team this year? No wonder you are so angry all the time. I was expecting 8-8, 9-7, and a wild card appearance with MAYBE one surprise playoff win, and I am irate.

People might have overestimated the amount of talent on this team, myself included. But their talent should amount to more than we are getting, right? I mean, do you agree that we are under-preforming right now, or do you think our record and infuriating play is more true to the “true” talent level of the team?

by rufio on Nov 24, 2008 1:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I had hoped for an elite team but realistically expected 9 wins and figured that would be good enough to take the division. Baltimore and Pittsburgh have played much, much better than I had anticipated. By now I expected Rothlisburgher to be out for the year due to injury and couldn’t picture the Ratbirds or Cinci winning more than 5 games.

B- more may run into a hangover next year as their defense ages and people figure out Flacco but Pittsburgh just never seems to die. As much as I hate them I have to respect their organization. They plug holes year after year and stay competative. The Bungles I think just exist to make us feel better about ourselves.

Outside of Cinci sucking even worse than us I was wrong about everything I predicted for the ACF North

by mgtbfb on Nov 24, 2008 1:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I said that we could be a much better team than last year and end up 8-8 or 9-7 because of our schedule. I still don’t think that was an unreasonable goal given our talent. Romeo was given a team that should have been .500 with our talent. He is 4-7 and looking at 1 “easy” game against Cincinnati and 4 games against playoff contenders.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 24, 2008 10:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I had the same expectations. I don’t think anybody on here expected the Browns to be an “elite” team. Of course we all hoped they would be, but that doesn’t mean anything. The schedule was much tougher this year, so I figured we could be 9-7 or 8-8 and still be much better than last year’s team. But this team has regressed, not improved. That is the fault of the coaching staff.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 24, 2008 10:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What talent? You have watched the same team I have all year. Where is the talent? We are a bad football team. That’s all there is to it.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 7:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How are we the only team that beat the Giants then…and handily at that? Lack of talent?

by Roger Dorn on Nov 24, 2008 7:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We handily beat the Giants. We were in the game until the end against Pitt and Washington. We were leading late in the game against the Ravens and the Broncos. How’d we do that?? Was a great game plan and smoke and mirrors? No! It was because we were as talented many of those teams. But a lack of late game execution, a lack ofcreative offensive and defensive play calling, a botched QB situation, poor clock management, distractions, disorganization on every level. That was all there. And that is on the coaching staff. This to say nothing of the “quitting” and lack of effort that has appeared the last few weeks.

We are a badly coached football team.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 24, 2008 9:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What is funny is that the point continues to surface that Browns enjoy playing for Romeo. I say this. If this performance is the result of players who enjoy playing for a coach, give me a coach who isn’t so well enjoyed by his players. Can we lay to rest the perception that players who enjoy playing for their coach produce on the field?

by elsandito on Nov 24, 2008 8:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Right. I don’t care if the players like the coach if they aren’t winning. Step up and win some games and then you can have a say in how it goes down

by Roger Dorn on Nov 24, 2008 8:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's All About Passion

I cannot believe these guys do not have passion or pride. They might as well be standing on the sidelines blindly observing like Coach Crennel. This football team (if I can call them that) needs someone like Cowher to kick thier A#$. Why do we have to incent guys that millions of dollars to play with passion? This football team is pathetic.

Why don’t we start Beu Bell if Andra Davis cannot stop anyone? I think we can offically call the season over and out!!

by Brownieforlife on Nov 23, 2008 7:19 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Atlanta is 7-4 and Miami is 6-5 this year following horrible 2007 seasons.

Both of them replacement the management AND coaching staffs. There is no argument for retaining Romeo and Phil.

by palcal on Nov 23, 2008 7:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Undeniably Savage has upgraded the talent on this roster. Not perfect, but drastically upgraded. Calling for him to leave is like calling for Shapiro to go after 06.

by kwoog on Nov 23, 2008 8:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Quoting Savage, “This is the worst we’ve been.”

by palcal on Nov 23, 2008 7:41 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

hopefully that is including him.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 23, 2008 8:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, because he did a horrible job drafting and signing free agents today…

by rufio on Nov 23, 2008 11:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Savage, whether you like it or not is part of this team when it wins and looses. Sure he has upgraded this roster, but lets be fair, it had nowhere to go but improve. I am not a big fan of trading draft picks, never have, never will. That is the one beef with Phil.
 However, IMO we won’t find out how good or bad a GM Phil is until the Browns get a head coach.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 23, 2008 11:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You know what you are right, trading draft picks for Shaun Rogers seems like the dumbest thing he could have done in hindsight.

by rufio on Nov 24, 2008 12:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Could you be a little more fair in your assessment of Savage’s track record? He’s made some good decisions, I’m sure GC would admit that. He’s also made some mistakes.

by NickFantana on Nov 24, 2008 12:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am honestly not sure that he would admit it.

When everyone brought up whether or not Savage should be fired, only one person bothered to look at others’ track record versus Savages to see if he is below/above average. Only one person did (Brad?) and he found that Savage was better than the Titans’ GMs in terms of draft hits vs misses.

What new mistakes do you want to pin on Savage? Couch? Gerrard Warren? He’s better than anything we’ve had.

How the hell are you asking me to be more fair about Savage’s record, especially when talking about trading draft picks? What other picks did he trade? Corey Williams is no where close to living up to the hype. Rogers is worth the 2nd, 3rd, and Bodden.

EVERY GM MAKES MISTAKES. Go fair yourself.

by rufio on Nov 24, 2008 12:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It wasn’t me. But I’ll gladly take the credit.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 24, 2008 10:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Duh — I should have read below.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 24, 2008 10:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ass- trying to take credit for my work. ha.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 24, 2008 10:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, I’m a prick.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 24, 2008 4:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rufio, there’s a great conversation going on downthread about this site and its developing community and, as a regular contributor, your voice would be welcome and appreciated. Of course, you don’t need me to tell you that.

To address two topics you brought up in your second response, I am unaware of any official title and don’t anticipate one. That wouldn’t really have an impact on my behavior on this site if it were the case. As for why I took issue with what you said, it’s because I know, from reading your recent analysis of the Browns pre-snap motions, you can do a lot better than simple sarcasm.

As I discuss down there, part of my goal in making comments like the above is to encourage a beneficial dialogue. In my view, your comment added little to the discussion but could easily be considered offensive or unnecessary by the original poster. I hasten to add that, since my comment, you’ve posted several coherent reasons for your view which DO help further the discussion.

My preference is that those reasons would come first, and then, if they’re ignored, the sarcasm can rain down. You may disagree with my preferences or my response to you and that’s fine. If you do take issue, I’d encourage you to do it without resulting first to sarcasm and profanity.

by NickFantana on Nov 24, 2008 8:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

1. I did not use profanity.

2. Its so obvious that Rogers was worth everything we gave up I didn’t think it warranted any more in depth anything. I did say (sarcastically, yes) that Rogers was worth what we traded. That’s at least something. After so many draft picks that have not turned out, and coming from someone who thinks Savage is doing a BAD job drafting…don’t you think it would be logical to trade any draft pick for arguably our best player? “I can’t stand Savage’s draft picks. So lets make him pick more”. The only argument against what Savage did is something like “I just don’t like trading draft picks”. The Rogers deal was clearly worth it. The reason you can’t usually make good picks for players trades is because that type of guy usually isn’t available. No one that big and that good was available in the whole draft last year, let alone in rounds 2 or 3.

3. At the bottom of the page, it says “exclusive editor” and then lists Chris’ name. It then says “minions” and has your name. Forvige me for thinking that meant you had something to do with running the site.

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 11:15 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

3. At the bottom of the page, it says "exclusive editor" and then lists Chris’ name. It then says "minions" and has your name. Forvige me for thinking that meant you had something to do with running the site.

Literally the first time I’ve ever seen that. Thanks for pointing that out and talking with me.

by NickFantana on Nov 25, 2008 11:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It was DaytonDogg not BuckeyeBrad doing analysis of the Titans’ drafts. He had them at a 29% “hit” rate.

Quick and admittedly uninformed hit/miss/can’t tell analysis on the Colts’ drafting leads me to 11 hits, 15 misses, and 5 have no idea/too early to tells 2005-present. I am trying to be really generous there, too.

I count 11 hits, 14 misses, and 5 too early to tells from Savages drafts, moving Wimbley and Jackson to the “too early” category, Hamilton to the “misses” and McDonald to the “hits” versus my earlier evaluations which seemed to be relatively agreed upon. Rubin is also now in my “hits” category based on his recent play, potential, the fact that we got him in the 5th round, and comparison to similar Colts players who I counted as “hits” because they contribute to their team after being drafted in the 4th+ rounds.

Clearly this is a far cry from science. If you have better analysis, bring it. Since you are the one who has an official title here, shouldn’t you be more constrained to “fair” criticisms than I am? I am hardly the most irrational outburster that posts here, and yet you take issue with the fairness of what I said?

Was what I said mean? Maybe, but it sure as hell was fair. Applying a rule of thumb such as “don’t trade away draft picks” to the Shaun Rogers trade is simply outrageous. You can say the Corey Williams deal was bad, so Savage is 50% in players for picks trades, and “good” in the league seems to be somewhere in the area of 30-40% in the draft. I would trade a 1st and 4th, 2 2nds, or a 2nd, 3rd, and 6th for Rogers right now. We traded a 21st overall pick to get Quinn at the 21st pick. Every time we have traded a pick away we have gotten something better than we could have with said pick.

He did all of this while he had to get key players at key positions because we had next to nothing when he got here. He had to weight his draft board to fill needs and couldn’t just wait to grab the “best available player”.

by rufio on Nov 24, 2008 1:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

relax, My only beef with Phil, and it is with moving draft picks, that is MY opinion, Hey you don’t like it fine. Yes the talent level on this team is better, however like I mentioned this team had no where else to go but improve. Jeez, chill (and in your words) “Dude”
 Savage has done a decent job. And the point I am making which I believe is fair, lets see what a good head coach can do with the talent he has drafted.
 The 21st pick was Felix Jones, and until he got hurt was and will be a pretty good player.
 And I respectfully disagree on trading a 1st, and 4th, 2 2nds or 2nd, 3rd, and 6th for Rogers, thats just me. I feel the majority of winning teams build with the draft.

Happy Thanksgiving!!

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 24, 2008 7:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You think the Rogers trade was a bad trade? Really?!?! You think we could have gotten a better player than him in the third round?

Yes, you build through the draft. But if you can get a productive, known player instead of an unknown player, wouldn’t you take that?

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 24, 2008 10:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, what he proposed he would trade right now, that I disagree with. No the actual trade was a good one, Rogers is a Pro Bowl player. I will clarify, The Rogers deal was good.
 Savage has done a decent job. The evaluation will continue. I just wish the defense would have more impact players besides Rogers.
 And like I mentioned Savage took this team over and the roster was filled with players who were below average.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 24, 2008 1:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You typically have to build through the draft.

You also typically aren’t able to trade for guys like Rogers.

Felix Jones was good before he got hurt, you are right. But you can find smaller, quicker running backs later in the draft. Slaton was a 3rd rounder. Chris Johnson seemed like a huge reach and he was picked up 3 picks later. Ray Rice (remember how he tore us up?) was a 2nd round pick, so was Matt Forte (who is the only reason I have won any fantasy games this year). Jamaal Charles and Kevin Smith were 3rd round picks.

My point is RBs like that are a dime a dozen and you don’t need to drop a 1st rounder on them. QBs are by no means the safest 1st round picks you could make, but I would rather have a potential franchise QB from the 1st round than a change of pace back.

by rufio on Nov 24, 2008 1:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you’re spot on about 1st round RBs. their shelf-life is too short, and they’re way too risky. i’d rather stockpile linemen (offense or defense) and LBs.

as for savage…i’ve said before i’m on the fence with him. after 4 years, though, i believe we have enough to evaluate him and romeo. they’ve improved the talent on this team, to be sure, but the 3-4 still isn’t working, the LBs suck, the DBs suck, and we still don’t breathe on the qb. hell, the OL is even back to struggling.

in year 4, this team is regressing. the talent may not be what we thought it was, but going in reverse is not acceptable. that’s enough for me to be willing to say goodbye to savage and romeo.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 24, 2008 5:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ll tell you what is upsetting and disappointing to me… This didn’t upset or disappoint me. I’ve grown numb to the team. I remember growing up, I was a huge Browns fan. I still watch all the games, and can probably name 50 of the 53 man roster without looking. But, as I was watching the game today, I found myself checking fantasy stats, I found myself looking at other scores, I found myself looking at my XM. The Browns have passed bad to me and have simply become boring. Don’t get me wrong, I’m rooting for them. But, at this point, it feels much more like an obligation than it ever should be…

by Fundamentals on Nov 23, 2008 8:37 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

i hate that we’re embarassing again. i hate that we’re a punchline again. that’s what i hate. i don’t know who to hold directly accountable for that, but something fundamental has to change in this organization.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 24, 2008 5:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Butch Davis vs. Romeo Crennel

Butch and the Browns parted ways after the 11th game of the ’04 season (with a cumulative regular season record 24-35, plus 0-1 in the post-season)

Romeo’s cumulative record is now 24-35 as well but he does not have a loss in the post-season to his credit.

Who took over the worse team, Butch or Romeo? The 2004 team had one more win than the 2000 team.

Robiskie finished the 2004 season with a 1-4 record, which is not a bad guess for the last 5 games of 2008, with or without Romeo. This would represent another 1-game improvement in the team turned over to a new coach, from 3-13 to 4-12 to 5-11.

by palcal on Nov 23, 2008 9:07 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

So your point is Butch Davis is a better coach than Romeo, well who isn’t?

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 23, 2008 10:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ask Detroit and Kansas City

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 12:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hate

how cleveland cant decide on a QB. I know Quinn was hurt but he should had never been the starter in the 1st place. D.Anderson wasent playing bad. The WR were just droping everything and he just stop thrwoing towards them. You guys better hope cleveland gets it together next season. also, to any of the people who said baltimore wont win more then 6 games this year(kwoog) 7-4 baby and we got cincy next so lets make it 8-4!

FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!

by Benji5203 on Nov 23, 2008 10:09 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Got to love the education of a fine Baltimore fan. Please take some night classes and get that grammer worked out.
 You run along now, us Brown fans will discuss our misery.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 23, 2008 10:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Since a Baltimore fan wants Anderson, that tells me we should stick with Quinn

by kjc on Nov 23, 2008 10:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If you are going to complain about grammar…

“grammer”

“Brown fans”

I mean, the Baltimore people should just take a hint and leave but….dude.

by rufio on Nov 23, 2008 11:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OK, dude. Thanks dude.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 23, 2008 11:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Now that is better spelling!

by rufio on Nov 24, 2008 12:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was thinking the same thing myself.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 12:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

go the fuck away. Asshole.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 23, 2008 11:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve banned him now.

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by ChrisPokorny on Nov 24, 2008 9:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

sorry for the profanity.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 24, 2008 10:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you.

by rufio on Nov 24, 2008 1:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

wait why did he get banned?

Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes

by Matchz Malone on Nov 25, 2008 3:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

because he disagreed with the Browns fans. I was “warned” for the same reason. Ohhh.

Rexx

by Rexx on Nov 25, 2008 11:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you are dense, that is why

by Roger Dorn on Nov 25, 2008 11:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s the way you say things. All you do is try to start arguments.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 25, 2008 11:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yea

He created his comment based around the fact that all of you guys on this blog stated that the Ravens would never get to the record we have now. He is making sure you understand that you are wrong. You have people on the other fan posts using profanity and insulting others, but when a Raven fan comes over here, gives his opinion and then makes sure that you guys don’t produce false statements about our record prior to that point, and you ban him. Good one man. You see a comment about how bad your team is doing and HOW WRONG you all were about saying we will never get above 6 wins, then the only way to make yourselves feel better is to ban the ones who are right. Class act.

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 25, 2008 1:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You don’t get it, and never will.

You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on Nov 25, 2008 1:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am glad I dont understand anything about your franchise.

It is too confusing and is a waste of time to be a Browns Fan.

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 25, 2008 1:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

See? It took all of 2 minutes to prove my point.

Thanks.

You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on Nov 25, 2008 1:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No one would have come to the logical conclusion that you would have the record you do this year. Rookie QB. Rookie HC.

Your team has overcome a lot this year, and is playing good football. Your record, so far, have been a surprise, though. No one predicted us to go 10-6 last year.

You are acting like you/Rexx are the ones who are winning. You are not. You are playing a pseudo-grownup game of “ha ha, told you so”. You told us so. Congratulations.

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 1:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here’s the thing. Many football fans, not from Baltimore, thought the Ravens would struggle this year. Some people on DBN said that. Did anyone from here go on to Baltimore Beatdown and say that? When we made our season projections, did we really ask or care what you thought of your team? The answer is no.

We are a bunch of fans of a struggling football team. There are rumors about our coach and GM. We have issues about with our QB, our RB, our WRs and TEs. We need LBs. We like to talk about these things with other fans of our team. We could care less about what you think we thought 4 months ago about your team.

When someone tries to provoke us and starts cheering about a Baltimore vs. Cincinnati game on a thread about who Browns fans are fed up with on the same day we suffered our worst loss of the season, well, its going to elicit a response like mine and a banning by our moderator. It doesn’t relate to the thread and it doesn’t add to our discussion. The post had no place here. Whatsoever. We have told you consistently that we don’t care to get into pointless and silly childish trash talking on this site. We are here to talk about football.

If you want to get a rise out of Browns fans, just go to any of the countless other Browns websites. You can start at cleveland.com

by DaytonDogg on Nov 25, 2008 1:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I guess the Browns management

has the same thought processes as these fans. No wonder the team is tanking another season.

Rexx

by Rexx on Nov 25, 2008 8:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you for this cogent and intelligent remark.

by fwembt on Nov 25, 2008 8:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This comment can’t be for real.

by DisplacedBuckeye on Nov 25, 2008 11:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, you were probably warned for being an asshole, but it was worded nicely.

When I flagged your post in another thread, I was pretty blunt about it.

You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on Nov 25, 2008 11:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Blunt, as in narrow minded?

I saw no profanity from any Ravens fans, only them pointing out the incorrect predictions that your fans posted after we beat you team, not once but twice, and got zero credit either time. When we lost to the Colts, Titans, Steelers and Giants, most of us went to their sites and told them how well they played and wished them good luck. Everywhere we go on SB Nation, all we hear are good things and the same usual negatives about the Browns fans. Glad to know it’s not just us.

Good luck the rest of the season. Perhaps you can help us out by beating the Steelers in the final week.

Rexx

by Rexx on Nov 25, 2008 8:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve talked to a blogger from the Steelers site and he says you guys go on their site and are jerks to them also. Why do you keep doing this? I don’t mind intelligent football talk, but you don’t offer any of that; all you and your buddies do is come on here and make derogatory remarks about the Browns and their fans. That’s not what SBN is for.

Also, you keep claiming that Browns fans come to your site and harass you guys. That’s the reason you give for bothering us constantly. So let me ask you — who does that? Give us some names. What members of this site go to your site and talk trash about the Browns? I don’t believe here does, but if you give me names (and show me examples of their posts) then I’ll believe you.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 25, 2008 9:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m going to go ahead and guess he will never respond to this. Because it simply has not happened, if it it has happened, it was certainly not from anyone who regularly comes here, posts, and adds to this site on a substanitive level.

Rexx, on the other hand, is “ChrisPo” of the Ravens SBN site. When he comes here, talks a lot of shit, and is generally trying to get a rise out of us, he does so as the representative of that site. I will not say that NO ONE who has ever posted here at DBN went over to the Ravens site and did the same. But I will guarantee you that ChrisPo has not, and will never.

I don’t mind trash-talking. And I certainly don’t mind fans of other teams coming here and commenting (see the Steelers fan who commented on the Brady Quinn out of the year thread). What I do mind is what Ravens fan have pu ton display here all too often. Trying to start a fight, or pointing fingers, or just basically taking being intellectually disengaged to a zen-like state has no place here.

by DisplacedBuckeye on Nov 26, 2008 4:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I checked around the blogs of both the Bills and Jaguars (the Browns’ two most recent wins) and saw no gloating, trashtalking, etc. from Browns fans on that site. Chris carried on a good question/answer thread over on the Jaguars site.

Then I checked some of the team blogs that both the Ravens and Browns have played, and guess what? No comments about Browns fans from those other teams, and more of the same trash from Ravens fans visiting those sites. And as expected, even more of Rexx begging and pleading those fans to come visit his blog. It’s quite sad, actually.

You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on Nov 27, 2008 11:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t give a shit about profanity, obviously. You add no relevant or intelligent discourse to the threads (relevant being a key point). You’ve jumped into a conversation that had absolutely nothing to do with Derek Anderson, nor the Ravens, but you purposely jumped in to stir shit up. The comparison to a mulligan on Anderson’s deal was illogical, and if you knew anything about his contract, you’d understand why.

Is your life so void, sad, and pointless, and your time so bountiful and unnecessary elsewhere that posting here when it’s unwanted and unappreciated seems to remain a priority weeks after the last time anybody expected to laugh at your incoherent ramblings?

Please don’t take that as an insult… it’s an honest question.

You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on Nov 25, 2008 10:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Blunt:

Verb

    * S: (v) blunt (make less intense) “blunted emotions”
    * S: (v) numb, benumb, blunt, dull (make numb or insensitive) “The shock numbed her senses”
    * S: (v) dull, blunt (make dull or blunt) “Too much cutting dulls the knife’s edge”
    * S: (v) blunt (make less sharp) “blunt the knives”
    * S: (v) deaden, blunt (make less lively, intense, or vigorous; impair in vigor, force, activity, or sensation) “Terror blunted her feelings”; “deaden a sound”

Adjective

    * S: (adj) blunt (having a broad or rounded end) “thick marks made by a blunt pencil”
    * S: (adj) blunt (used of a knife or other blade; not sharp) “a blunt instrument”
* S: (adj) blunt, candid, forthright, frank, free-spoken, outspoken, plainspoken, point-blank, straight-from-the-shoulder (characterized by directness in manner or speech; without subtlety or evasion) “blunt talking and straight shooting”; “a blunt New England farmer”; “I gave them my candid opinion”; “forthright criticism”; “a forthright approach to the problem”; “tell me what you think—and you may just as well be frank”; “it is possible to be outspoken without being rude”; “plainspoken and to the point”; “a point-blank accusation”
    * S: (adj) blunt, crude, stark (devoid of any qualifications or disguise or adornment) “the blunt truth”; “the crude facts”; “facing the stark reality of the deadline”

by rufio on Nov 26, 2008 12:38 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

He was not banned for his first post. He was banned for an uncalled for personal insult that was completely unrelated to football. I removed the comment from the site, but if you’d like me to send it to you off-list, shoot me an email.

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by ChrisPokorny on Nov 27, 2008 11:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry guys here check this out-http://www.walterfootball.com/draft2008.php it is now draft season.

by 44Express on Nov 23, 2008 10:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know. Kind of hard to take seriously when he has the Browns with the 11th pick. Is he predicting that they’re gonna trade down?

by JustBob on Nov 24, 2008 9:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That is a pretty bad mock draft. Who would take Orakpo 2nd overall?

by rufio on Nov 26, 2008 1:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hate Randy Lerner, boy needs to stop worrying about his stupid soccer team and put a qualitly product on the field HERE. The fans in Cleveland deserve better and I think that may require a new owner, a new GM, and a new coach. Until they look like a professional football team and play with some fight, I mean my god you’re getting beat at home, at least play angry.

by KardiacKid on Nov 23, 2008 11:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Dude the reason Lerner is a good owner is because he KNOWS he doesn’t know jack crap about football. He hires people who do to make the football decisions and he stays out of the rest of it.

Al Davis is a hands-on owner. The Raiders are TERRIBLE and they offer guys TERRIBLE contracts. Jerry Jones is the ONLY hands-on owner I can think of who has been consistently successful in the NFL. Every other good team right now has an owner who signs the checks and SsTFU.

Lerner’s job is to sign checks. If he puts out all the money he can to make the team better, he is doing his job. Did he not cut enough of a check for you today or something? I mean giving fans a refund might be polite, but it won’t help us win.

by rufio on Nov 23, 2008 11:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Good call man, actually an angle I hadn’t thought of it from. I guess I would just hope that even if he is just writing checks as you say, that he would at lease pressure his personnel to get it together. I mean it may not matter much to him, but the whole reason he stuck around was to carry on the legacy of Al Lerner, and right now he’s not doing it much justice.

by KardiacKid on Nov 24, 2008 11:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am sure there is no one more frustrated than he is. I wonder how much value the team has lost recently with both the economy doing what it is doing and the Browns playing how they are playing. My guess is that he is doing everything reasonable to make the Browns a good team. It would be rational for him to do so.

Then again, I have zero contact with Randy Lerner so I clearly don’t know for sure. I once drove by Al Lerner’s house, true story.

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 11:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the one on south woodland? so did i…i’m basically a part of the lerner family.

you can bet that lerner is tearing his hair out over the state of the browns. he wants nothing more than to see his dad’s legacy to the city succeed. i’ve actually spoken w/ people who’ve discussed this with randy, and that’s been the message.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 25, 2008 11:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

great (if short) randy piece from the pd

to me, he sounds pretty convincing that he cares, he knows what’s going on, and he (smartly) will evaluate everything at season’s end. i’m reading “sayonara phil and romeo”. lerner gives the rope to the football org to hang itself…he’s not wrong to give the rope, he just needs to find better people to give it to.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 25, 2008 12:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I very much prefer this situation to a meddling owner who tries to run the team and thinks he knows football. Hire good people and let them do their job.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 25, 2008 1:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the biggest assist randy needs now is from the football people who advise him on which football people to hire!

here’s one for you…how about hiring scott pioli?

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 25, 2008 1:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am a big Randy Lerner fan, I think the fans overreact and look to blame anyone in sight, but Lerner takes a levelheaded approach and doesn’t overreach has capabilities. He makes the high-level personnel decisions and money has not seemed to be an issue. I give him my full vote of confidence

by Roger Dorn on Nov 25, 2008 2:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A. His other team plays football. Their fans hardly deserve short shrift just because the Browns suck.
B. His other team is very successful and he does no more or less in the day to day operation of them. (Aston Villa, by the way).
C. Lerner is one of the better owners in the NFL. He gave his GM the money and flexibility to do what he wanted with the team. Blaming Lerner is relatively ignorant.
D. Maybe you should watch an Villa game if you want to see good football. It’s certainly better than watching the Browns.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 12:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rec. Unrelated to the thread, but does anyone else feel like MON’s success at AV lends credence to the Cowher to Cleveland rumors? Obviously having a single person act as manager / GM in european football is the norm, while it’s the exception in the NFL. But it makes you wonder whether Lerner may try to replicate the org structure on this side of the pond…

by jjfoosk on Nov 24, 2008 3:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

he’s very gunshy about that, at least as far as the Browns are concerned, given the Butch Davis experience

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 24, 2008 5:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d rather see Martin O’Neill here than Bill Cowher. I do wonder why the one man operation seems to work so well in football and so poorly in…football.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 7:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Are you kidding? What exactly do you want Lerner to do?

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 24, 2008 10:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t want to admit it before, but now I know Romeo needs to go. As much as I hate the word “rebuild” and as much as I think the early successes of Atlanta, Baltimore, etc. will “come back down to earth” soon, he clearly needs to go.

Andra Davis cannot play in this scheme and might be too average to play anywhere. He doesn’t tackle well, he doesn’t hit especially well, he doesn’t cover especially well, he doesn’t stop the run especially well…

I hate that Braylon doesn’t know now or at least didn’t know in the offseason that his success, his team’s success, and getting a ring will make him more of a viable commercial product and a richer man than dressing well and having one successful season ever can. He is broken. Can anyone fix him? I have no idea. The potential is there, but potential doesn’t mean crap.

Either DA or Quinn needs to go. No more switcheroo.

Every LB besides Hall, Jackson and Wimbley needs to go. Those three are decent, should be told they have to earn their starting spots/roster spots, and still have a chance to be good. It would be darn near impossible to get 3+ quality LBs in one offseason, though.

Cousin.

Mel Tucker. I have no idea if he is running Romeo’s scheme, calling the plays, etc. but what he is doing is not working as well as it should. We got in Trent Edwards’ head, looked decent at times on D on Monday, but still ended up allowing 27 points. 16 isn’t that bad in today’s loss, but you would love to see us dominate a guy like Rosenfels. We didn’t. We don’t get the ball back quick enough to the offense, especially at key times of the game. I wouldn’t trust our D to stop a 4th and 1 to win the game unless the other team ran the ball at Rogers. We don’t have the most talent in the league on D, but the schemes are making our players worse, not better. Great coordinators can get more production out of less talent. Tucker is not.

by rufio on Nov 24, 2008 12:32 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

It all starts with coaching

Fat Romeo and his defensive staff need to be fired. Week ten and the defense is doing tackeling drills. What the fuck is that? Instead of doing tackling drills why don’t the browns fucking blitz. Not once do we send more than three guys and play that pathetic excuse of a zone defense. Sage fucking Rosenfuells picked those lame excuse of a defense all day. Obviously if you make it to the nfl you should have some talent. Its the intagnibles learned from the coaches and their playbooks. They need to get guys with heart and who want to play. As much as i hate to say look at the steelers. They send ppl from all sorts of places. Every year there is a new stud linebacker. How the fuck do the browns miss these players…they do not motivate the team. Crennel just sits there and never gets fired up. He looks like a retard after every play when the cameras focus on him after the defense fucks up play after play. And what the fuck is with him benching quinn. Yes, quinn did make to back to back mistakes, but fucking anderson is the worst QB ever. He has no touch and looks like a jackass fucking arguing with every player on the team after every play he fucks up.

The browns need a real coach and phil savage should start harrasing bill cohwer to come to cleveland and get under the defenses skin. This is bull shit how crennel is supposed to be a defensive savior. News flash bill bellicheck called all the fucking plays and schemes in new england and romeo did shit. he doesn’t motivate and he is soft.. just like the defense and stone hands.

by cAVSkING23 on Nov 24, 2008 2:18 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I commend you on your fine rant. This should be used as a template for all future rants.

by elsandito on Nov 24, 2008 9:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i was going to write a lenghty comment about RAC, but you sir have covered what i had to say brilliantly. i would add this: there is talent on this team, and anyone who says there isn’t is being negative for the sake of being negative. with competent coaching (mainly motivation and killer instinct) this team’s record is probably reversed, at 7-4, in fact we may even be 8-3. This all falls on Romeo. Many of the successful teams in this league have similar deficiencies, but good coaches compensate for them.

yesterday’s QB situation sealed RAC’s fate, in my opinion. I would not be at all surprised to see him fired this week. nothing like crushing quinn’s confidence and making him look over his shoulder after 2 1/2 games, while allowing DA to put us in a hole that was nearly impossible to climb out of for 8 games. His general coaching is pathetic, but that was inexcusable.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 24, 2008 10:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m still trying to figure out how you bench Quinn but leave those sorry receivers on the field. Could it be Quinn injured that finger trying too hard to gift wrap all of his passes (making bows can be a pain) in the hopes that maybe, one day, a receiver might see it in his heart to actually hold on to it?

by dmadcat on Nov 24, 2008 12:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I like the proclamations with nothing to back them. There is no way you can claim a 7-4 or 8-3 record just off the top of your head like that. A different coach keeps Wright from slipping against Baltimore or McDonald from getting abused against Denver?

I’ve said repeatedly that this is not a very talented team and the results continue to show that. Please tell me what players we have that are above league average. There aren’t many at this point.

I do agree that, rightly or wrongly, yesterday sealed Romeo’s fate. You just can’t make that move and then not even bother to tell the involved parties why you did it.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 7:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wright, Pool, Rogers, Williams, Smith, Cribbs, Dawson, Winslow, Thomas, Steinbach, Fraley, Vickers, Heiden.

And that’s just starters off the top of my head. It also doesn’t include guys like Tucker who are above-average, but hurt.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 24, 2008 9:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rogers, Cribbs, Dawson, Winslow and maybe Thomas. We argued this ad nauseum two weeks ago and I see no point in doing it again. I think we are 4-7 because we just aren’t very good. You think we are 4-7 because somehow Romeo has blown three 13 point leads and can’t catch a pass.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 11:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Straw man. On me. You didn’t say that, you just said that the coaching was the problem. Mea Culpa.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 11:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You don’t think Steinbach is above average?

by Roger Dorn on Nov 25, 2008 8:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There really is no point in arguing it again. Every team in the NFL has talent. Nobody thought the Dolphins were talented last year.

Can you at least agree that a talented team can play really poorly and have a bad record as a result? Or that an OK team can outplay their record?

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 11:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you don’t think poor playcalling and lack of killer instinct by the man in charge had anything to do with blowing those leads or coming out the way we did against Houston? you think a belichick team blows those leads? a dungy team? a cowher team? I for one do not. Claiming 7-4 or maybe 8-3 isn’t off the top of my head, and of course it’s speculation, but tell me it’s far fetched to think this: under one of the previously mentioned coaches we – 1) don’t blow those leads because we keep our foot on the gas, 2) come out ready to play and don’t lose a game to the lousy Texans at home, 3) possibly win the very winnable game against the squeelers with some better playcalling. that gets us 7-4 or 8-3. Of course there are no guarantees, but i don’t think its that crazy to make the statement I made. at any rate, we’re better than 4-7 with someone else.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 25, 2008 11:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The 2008 Browns

 What was RC thinking pulling Brady? Hell he can run 9 weeks with DA, and all the INT’s he threw.
We just plain " STINK"
I am not Looking Forward to being at the game with the Colts. The only thing I can count on is it being cold and BE dropping balls….MR 50/50.
Lerner do not bring in another on- the – job coach to learn. Open up and pay the $$$$ and get someone who is a NFL coach.
The Tumbstone " Browns’s 1999-2008" STINK !!!!! LOVE YOU BRUCE on " ALL BETS ARE OFF !!!"
Cowher is out there, but look at all the talent that went through Pittsburgh with him there, and it took him 15 years to get the Superbowl win. Will Cleveland wait that long?
The TEAM NEED HELP…..Dr Phil ?

by ZAP63 on Nov 24, 2008 12:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Maybe the Colts will bring Sorgi (sp?) – I wonder what kind of numbers he would be able to post against the Browns?

by JustBob on Nov 24, 2008 9:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ur right about the tremendous wasting of talent by Bill Cowher in Pitt., though there is no doubt that RAC needs to go after yesterday’s inexplicably bad performance. Benching BQ is inexcusable as is the lack of basic defensible fundamentals that should come from a “defensive specialist.” From what I’ve heard on the radio, RAC is one hour late for his press conference and has never been late in four years.

by KBizzle on Nov 24, 2008 12:54 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The reason for the lateness of the press conference: “The meetings ran late.” I wonder what they were discussing: how bad the defense was or how dumb it was for him to bench quinn.

by KBizzle on Nov 24, 2008 12:57 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The meetings had better run late. And then practice better run late. Every single day. And film study better run late. And I want Braylon to catch so many god damn balls from Brady Quinn that he doesn’t sleep between now and Sunday.

“Ran late.” Damn straight.

by DisplacedBuckeye on Nov 24, 2008 1:31 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Defense was not that bad

by Roger Dorn on Nov 24, 2008 1:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Only allowing 16 points should win a game.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 7:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that allowing 16 points should win the game; BUT a lot of that was due at least partly to how inept the other offense was. I mean, really: to give up 275 yards passing to Sage Rosenfels? To have virtually no pass rush throughout the game? To consistently give 15 yard cushions to the receivers? To leave the middle of the field open for almost an entire game? I couldn’t believe how open their receivers were, and how easy it was to complete passes at will. To the extent that the overall goal of the defense is to minimize points allowed, I’ll concede that it wasn’t a bad effort. But I don’t think there is any way you could call that a good defensive effort. The game plan appeared to be to play soft and hope the other team made a mistake, rather than playing aggressively. It was an offense prone to mistakes, true. But any NFL quarterback will kill you with no pressure and receivers running open up the field. Makes the game look easy, no?

by drjeo on Nov 24, 2008 7:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think that is part of Romeo’s strategy though, and if you look closely, the defense really played pretty well in the second half with the game on the line. Bottom line is 16 pts allowed against a pretty good offense, Sage Rosenfels is better than you give him credit for when he is throwing to Andre Johnson and Kevin Walter

by Roger Dorn on Nov 24, 2008 7:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Kevin Walter should not be in that discussion. I’ll give you Owen Daniels.

Still, you would like to see the defense play better and get the offense the ball back quickly after some 3 and outs more often. Obviously you can always play better.

They didn’t do a bad job, and they did better than the offense, but I certainly wouldn’t grade them out at a 90+. You expect to hold a team like the Texans under 10 points and 225 passing (about 150 of those belonging to Johnson).

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 11:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Walter is better than our number 2

by Roger Dorn on Nov 25, 2008 11:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

paul warfield RIGHT NOW is better than our number 2.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 25, 2008 11:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not when Stallworth is healthy.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 25, 2008 11:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

When that day comes, I will re-evaluate

by Roger Dorn on Nov 25, 2008 11:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

that is definitely true. and the texans are 4th in the league in total yards and pass yards. let’s not discount that offense too much. pretty good defensive performance.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 25, 2008 11:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The defense was terrible terrible, god awful in the first half. They played good to very good almost great in the second half. But that first half was tough. We ran, what, 3 offensive plays in the first quarter? The D couldn’t even force an incompletion and I’m sure they could have ran against us more if they wanted to.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 24, 2008 9:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Still, we only allowed 16 points in the game. That should really be enough to get us a win. Does anyone else find it interesting that Lewis was finally running moderately well but was only used 10 times?

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 11:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lewis certainly seems to, given his comments in the press. chud isn’t doing himself any favors as far as keeping the leaders of the offense happy, and his (seeming) inability to stick with parts of the gameplan that are successful—or go away from those that aren’t—is really troubling.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 25, 2008 11:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Lewis certainly finds it interesting. Maybe he’ll start running angry.

We only allowed 16 points, but that’s not the defense’s entire job. Its a good point total to allow, but again, they wouldn’t grade out above 90.

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 11:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, and I don’t argue that they were great. I just think, all flaws aside, only allowing 16 points gives you a very good chance to win a football game.

by fwembt on Nov 25, 2008 8:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If I had to blame one or the other, I would put this loss on the offense. 16 points was good for this game, and gave us a good chance to win.

But it depends on the style of game. A Tressel-ball 2002esque OSU team would not consider that a success. Drew Brees and the Saints would sell kidneys on the black market to hold the other team to 16 right now.

by rufio on Nov 26, 2008 12:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Quinn’s tendon is damaged, too. That’s bad.

Hopefully it doesn’t need surgery, and if it does hopefully he only needs like 4 weeks off. The more chemistry he can get with guys in the offseason, the better. No one on offense will be relaxing in Hawaii this year so they’ll have plenty of time to run routes in Berea.

Are there any free agent WRs out there?

by rufio on Nov 24, 2008 1:28 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The news just keep better and better. Goodness this year has been bad.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 24, 2008 4:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think a lot of people are in the same boat, but volume always wins out.

For a lot of people, this place looks nothing like LGT. But I remember LGT when it was a lot wilder, just like this place is now. At the risk of looking inward too much, I think that we’re all part of an exciting process of refining discourse and coming to terms with the way we talk about the Browns.

There are a lot of differences between baseball and football and there are a lot of differences between LGT and DBN. I will say, however, that both sites are filled with people that have a remarkable passion for their team. That’s what makes it great.

I’ve been making cautious, occasional attempts to point out a particular example of unfair treatment or unnecessary rhetoric. As with any internet site, people will take that personally. Upthread, rufio got pretty bent out of shape at me telling him I thought he wasn’t being fair.

My mistake was critizing a lack of fairness, when what should have been criticized was a lack of willingness to build a constructive discourse. As rolub and Brad so astutely noticed, a community doesn’t benefit from diatribes or polemics, it benefits from conversation. Any attempts by myself, and by others, if I can be so bold, to correct the course of a discussion has nothing to do with judging the argument and everything to do with how the argument is made.

by NickFantana on Nov 24, 2008 8:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It is a touchy thing. I’ve gotten into it with Jay from time to time over on LGT because I think he goes the over the line. But I find my self taking a Jay-like stance over here on DBN. Happily for me, other regulars have begun to take that role (thanks Nick, Brad, rolub, et. al.).

Its a tough line though around here. We have a smaller community here than LGT and we could afford some more regulars, so we need to be a little welcoming. When things (like yesterday’s game) happen, it brings out all kinds of fans looking to vent and its tough to sift through the overreaction of someone with something to offer and someone that needs to be automatically redirected to cleveland.com anytime they go to a SBN site.

Now… let’s talk some football.

GO BROWNS.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 24, 2008 10:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the LGT references are annoying and elitist. It’s a different blog about a different sport. What if person X doesn’t visit LGT? Should he be battered over the head with how high its standards are?

by joeee on Nov 24, 2008 10:10 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

It’s a different blog about a different sport.

It’s also the best source for Indians news on the internet and one of the smartest and involving communities online. I’m hardly the only person who believes that. They do the traffic and they have the rep.

by NickFantana on Nov 24, 2008 11:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I also believe LGT is life-changingly awesome. But constantly referring to it only undermines DBN’s cause – instead of the intention of reinforcing it. DBN is it’s own thing that has it’s own appeal, and need not look with jealousy or stand in the shadow of some other blog. LGT is the best source for Indians news on the internet. DBN is the best source for Browns news. Browns. News.

by joeee on Nov 24, 2008 11:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re making an important point and I can’t dispute it.

by NickFantana on Nov 24, 2008 11:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I just think a place needs to become great by example, not by imploring it to become great. I also think excessive self-reference undermines greatness. Seriously though, this blog kicks ass. Not perfect, but definitely kicks ass.

by joeee on Nov 24, 2008 11:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

that was my whole point joeee: That DBN is not LGT, we have different issues here. Namely, you talk about football in a different way than baseball, DBN is a smaller community, and DBN hasn’t been quite as established.

But I don’t think its wrong to use LGT as a strong example of a good site. It is part of the same network and many of the regulars here are familiar with it.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 25, 2008 11:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well said and, at the risk of offending the non-LGT readers among us, there is no harm in trying to aspire to the standard of a more established site. I’ve been there a long time as well and can remember when it was much more Wild West than it is now.

Frankly, the hard part of establishing a good community is weeding out the moronic, wildly combative or reflexive posters. Posts that contribute nothing or are only intended to stir up problems should be attacked. It’s natural selection on the internet. Once the chaff is culled from the wheat, you end up with LGT or, shortly down the road, DBN.

This should in no way be read as an insult to Chris. I think this place is making fantastic progress and it is rapidly becoming my one stop for all things Browns like LGT is for all things Indians.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 11:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The thing is, a blog that is dominant needs a critical mass of really sharp posters just as much as it needs rebuking of the morons. Another blog out there – namely one about the Indians – CREATED it’s own mass of quality posters, while attracting pre-existing smarties as well. I think DBN is improving me, as a reader, and I’m sure countless others out there. The critical mass will come.

by joeee on Nov 24, 2008 11:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

WTF I don’t visit LGT, why would I want a more-established anything!?

(intended as polite sarcasm, agreeing with you and your point)

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 11:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Is this supposed to be a passive-aggressive apology? Should I be offended? I am really confused.

I still think it was unfair to single me out while there seem to be people posting here who make a lot less valid points in a lot less polite ways than I usually do.

Like I said, I may in fact be a jerk and I am fine with anyone calling me such names. Should I have been that sarcastic right away? Probably not, if there would ever be a time where I would feel 100% good about reacting like that.

But you, sir, certainly did not make a “cautious, occasional attempt to point out a particular example of unfair treatment or unnecessary rhetoric.”. You asked me to be more fair in my assessment of Savage’s track record. If confronted with changing the way I made the argument I probably would have admitted wrongdoing just like I am now, but not being fair in my evaluation of Savage’s picks-for-players trades? I think its pretty clear that Rogers is the only consistently bright spot for this team this year.

I took issue with
1. you singling me out over everyone else
2. you criticizing my fairness toward evaluating Savage’s GM track record instead of my rudeness.
AND I was under the pretense that you were working here in some fashion. I am fine with Chris stepping in when it involves the way things should be said, but not about what people are saying.

I feel more justified in reacting to you than the original poster.

The way I am reading it, “bent out of shape” carries a negative connotation towards me. If you did not mean to imply such a thing, please clarify.

I will try to be less of a prick in the future. Mine was an emotional outburst, something that I think any passionate fan will always have. We don’t need to be OK with this as a site, but we need to know it will happen. I would like to think that I have brought enough calmness and rationality to the table to be allowed a slip up here and there.

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 12:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jeese Brad, you just don’t let go.

I’m done with this argument. You should get a cap and badge that allows you to police every single “we shud fire RAC” comment there is. Tirelessley belittle these posters. Please.

by joeee on Nov 24, 2008 9:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Uhh….I didn’t start this. Seriously, what’s your problem? What have I ever done to you to deserve this?

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 24, 2008 9:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Defensive, veiled references to “some posters” complaining about your otherwise righteous cause. Whatever dude, it’s all yours.

by joeee on Nov 24, 2008 9:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow. You complain about me “policing” other people yet you continually police my comments. You said that everyone else was on your side, that I was the only one who didn’t just ignore these people. Well, I guess you were wrong, It bothers other people too. And by the recs on the comments above, it’s more than just one person. So maybe everyone isn’t on your side.

Are you going to continue to attack me as long as we’re on this blog?

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 24, 2008 9:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Distortions.

I did not say everyone else was on “my side”, you are just misguided. I said there were two other posters who had brought up the subject of comment policing in that specific thread.

There is much you misinterpret. Namely – aggravation toward newb comments. Trust me, they drive me nuts too. I would guess that they drive everyone nuts. That is part of my complaint about your rebuffs – sometimes the poster is so hopeless, or the problem with his post is so obvious to everyone, that it doesn’t even need to be said by you everytime. Or maybe it does. As I said, if you’d like to go after each and every dumb comment, I think you absolutely should. You’ve convinced me!

I’m not policing your comments. Your “recced” comment referenced me:

Some people were trying to make it seem like I was the only guy who felt this way.

I am responding. Surely you, a proponent of open forum, would like me to reply when referred to in a veiled manner?

I don’t attack you. I am criticising one specific aspect of your comments. That is what you are all about, isn’t it? Improving this blog? While your at it, you can stop with this martyr motif. I am not persecuting you – you have done nothing to “deserve” my terrible wrath. Speaking of improving this thread, you and I are done with this topic. We – yes both you and me – are now trolling on the subject of whether or not to bring down the hammer on all bad comments. So stop complaining about me, and I’ll stop complaining about you.

by joeee on Nov 24, 2008 10:06 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Do you guys just want to apologize to each other and let it go?

by NickFantana on Nov 24, 2008 11:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No. Because that implies that it was ever personal. It isn’t. Brad is a sweet poster. Tackle the ball, not the man.

by joeee on Nov 24, 2008 11:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OK, I don’t want this to continue either. I was going to post a long response about your distortions, but I’ll just let it go. I thought this was over, which is why I made that joke to you during the game thread about your spelling. I didn’t mean to start anything again. I was just glad to see that other people felt the same way that I did, because I felt as though you were saying I was the only one who thought that way and that’s certainly not true. I really didn’t expect you to respond like you did and start this arguement again. But it’s over. Don’t worry, I won’t be responding to any idiotic comments any more. I’ll leave that to other people to do.

Go Browns!

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 25, 2008 7:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That wasn’t my point – to never respond. A lot of times its merited. Is it merited at every single instance? Does it always appear in the best interest of the blog, and not just posturing on the part of the person criticizing? Remember how jarring it is when I criticized your comments?

by joeee on Nov 25, 2008 9:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Really, you think I respond to every stupid comment on here?

And I think there’s a big difference between criticizing thoughtful, well-intentioned comments and moronic, thoughless comments (like Rolub was talking about above). The only people I criticized were the drive-by posts or comments by people that don’t even participate in this site and just stop by to say something stupid. Or the Ravens guys who come over to cause trouble. If I make a comment like that then you have a right to critcize me. But I don’t think I’ve ever done that. So I’m not sure how you can compare you criticizing me to me criticizing them.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 25, 2008 9:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Obligatory plea to get along:

by DisplacedBuckeye on Nov 25, 2008 11:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

On one hand, the postmodern style of joeee earns points. But he seems to fully assume the role of critic too fully instead of using it as a guise in order to poke fun at or point out a flaw in the act of criticism, so I take those points away.

Brad is trying to be helpful. I like people asking posters to follow rules that will make this a better site, but I don’t like doing it a whole lot. Thanks for the dirty work, Brad. However, Brad just beat my fantasy team, so all his points are taken away.

Why am I rambling like an idiot?

Because I think you guys should let the personal stuff go, and just get on with the real discussion (if there is one here). I am sure you guys both want this to be a better site. What is the best way to do that? Who should be doing that (and no jokes about handing out hats)?

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 11:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, for one, if we were winning I don’t think we’d have so much tension and frustration going on in here.

There’s that.

by DisplacedBuckeye on Nov 25, 2008 11:59 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Really, I won? I was hoping Aaron Rodgers would come through for me. I’m at school and the website is blocked so I haven’t had a chance to check it yet.

I think this is a great site but sometimes, especially after a loss, we get a bunch of people stopping by to make some stupid post or comment about how bad our team is. It’s one thing to discuss what we can do to improve the team, or even talk about who needs to go, but to just post dumb names for the team or ramble on about how you’re giving up being a fan doesn’t accomplish anything. I know many people agree with me, and many others have replied to stupid posts in the same way I have. I was just wondering why I was singled out as though I was doing something wrong or different.

I certainly hope that I haven’t offended anyone here with any of my comments. That is definately not my intention. I think we can disagree about players, coaches, and strategy while being civil about it. That’s the reason that I, and I’m sure all of you, participate in this site. I think that we should hold new members up to the standard that we have set on this site. That’s all I have been trying to do. And it’s clear that I’m not alone in this belief. I didn’t like the implication that I make fun of people for their spelling and grammar mistakes because that’s not the kind of person that I am and it makes me seem like a jerk. I’m not like that at all, and I hope nobody here thinks of me that way.

I’m very happy that this site has grown since I found it last year and more people are participating and discussing the Browns because that’s what makes this place fun. I just think that we need to make sure that everyone knows what kind of standard we have here for posts and comments and that it doesn’t turn in to place like the cleveland.com message boards.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 25, 2008 12:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Time and place is key. When some dbag Ravens fans show up just trying to be salt in our wounds? Hound them to death. When it’s a Browns fan who is making a terrible point? Try to instruct and help him if you can – bring the hammer down in a constructive way if at all possible.

by joeee on Nov 25, 2008 1:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i’ve only become a regular over the past couple of months, but it’s become obvious who i like to hear from and those who just try to make noise. Thanks to rufio, brad, dorn, etc. I enjoy your insight and appreciate being welcomed in. i hope i can contribute once in awhile.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 25, 2008 11:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was going to say something nice, but then I saw that you’re a Penn State fan. So now I take it all back.

GO BUCKS!!!

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 25, 2008 12:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Where do you think we go bowlin?

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 12:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It all depends on the Oregon St. game. If they beat Oregon, they win the Pac Ten and go to the Rose Bowl and USC will most definately get an at-large invite to the BCS. The other three at-large bids will be Utah, SEC loser, and Big 12 south loser. So OSU will be left out and probably go to the Capital One Bowl against Georgia. If Oregon St. loses, USC goes to the Rose Bowl and OSU will get the last at-large BCS bid. Probably to the Fiesta Bowl against whichever Big 12 doesn’t make the Championship.

So we’re rooting hard for Oregon this weekend.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 25, 2008 12:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, it’s been pretty hard to deal with you at times too, but I just try to focus on our mutual love for the brownies. i graduated from PSU and live about 20 minutes away from there. blue and white all the way. hopefully we get a shot at USC and not a shitty rematch with the beavers.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 26, 2008 9:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The community is growing rapidly, and I think the more intelligent, well-reasoned posters we get in here, the more we can learn from each other about football and what can fix this team

by Roger Dorn on Nov 25, 2008 2:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

well said rolub, well said.

by DaytonDogg on Nov 24, 2008 10:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Edwards and Winslow are QB killers...

..and toxic to team success. Especially when they are on the same team. It would be an entirely different atmosphere without those two idiots.

by robert ethan on Nov 24, 2008 5:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

i disagree on winslow being a QB killer…if anything, he played the biggest role in making anderson a pro bowler last year (outside of the OL) with his total effort once he hits the field. off the field, different story, but there are few guys in the NFL who give as much as winslow when b/w the lines.

i will say, though, that it’s gotta be tough to have both winslow and edwards in the locker room.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 24, 2008 5:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you for that very cogent and intelligent point.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 7:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

One of the things I’ve noticed is the extent to which Tony Grossi will now regularly throw Edwards or Winslow under the bus, particularly for their childish habit of avoiding postgame interviews. One of the two of them will be gone next year, I expect.

by NickFantana on Nov 24, 2008 8:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Really, that’s a shame. Both of them could be very good. I think that, as a city, we react far too much to the personality of our players and not nearly enough to the way they play. This seems to be a recent development. Albert Belle tried to run people over and not much was said about it. Kellen Winslow or Braylon Edwards squints wrong and gets vilified. It’s odd.

by fwembt on Nov 24, 2008 11:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

agreed, it really is a shame. with both of those guys producing, the offense can really be special (see: 2007). i will say, though, that with guys who are clearly as emotional (and ego-centric) and 80 and 17, you need a stronger leadership structure in place than the browns currently do.

i’m going to disagree w/ your second point slightly. when belle was the best player in the AL and the tribe was great, it was easy to look past his off-field transgressions (not condoning that, certainly); similarly, when the browns were arguably the most exciting offense in football and winning 10 games last year, you didn’t hear a peep about winslow’s motorcycle or edwards’ helicopter trips. given that the team is struggling, the offense sucks, edwards blows and winslow’s production is down, that quickly moves the focus to off-field sh*t.

i guess my point is, winning cures all. when you aren’t winning, you’ve got way too much time to think about other bs.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 25, 2008 11:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m a bit confused. I saw several posts talking about how Lewis and Thomas stinking it up.

Granted, I’ve been pretty frustrated with Lewis’ tip-toe to the LOS this year, but in this last game he had 5.8 YPC. Yes, he fumbled, but I don’t recall that being a chronic problem with him. He’s probably better in that department than a lot of other RBs. His comments to the press are another matter, but I didn’t see that mentioned in the posts that ragged on him.

Thomas. Did he give up sacks on Quinn? No. Did he give up sacks on Anderson? No. Well, he did get that holding penalty. Is that an NFL 1st for a left tackle? No.

I guess my point is, there are a lot of truly horrible things about the 2008 Browns to hate, we should be able to stick to the truly hate-worthy things.

What do I hate? So many things have been covered already and I don’t want to repeat them, but one thing that doesn’t seem to have gotten its due is the offensive play calling. Every since Chud came out with his “Let’s throw long repeatedly in this really strong wind” game plan in Cincy last year I’ve been wondering if maybe he shouldn’t be subjected to some drug testing.

To be sure, for most of the season there’s only been one potentially pro-calibre WR on the field for most of the season, and he’s more likely to drop passes than a $2 hooker is to drop her knickers, but that doesn’t fully explain the reluctance to use some of the other weapons available.

I hate Chud.

by JustBob on Nov 24, 2008 9:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Joe Thomas is good. ESPN just had a article praising Jake Long that I can’t find anymore. Long allows a sack on 2.1% of deep pass dropbacks or something like that. They were talking about how totally awesome he is. Joe Thomas was ranked above him with a 1.1% sack/deep pass dropback rate.

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 11:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

joe thomas is beyond good. joe thomas is great in this, just his second season.

he had a down game against houston, but as randy cross pointed out today, he wasn’t as bad as the cleveland papers/blogs would have you believe. not to mention, mario williams is a BEAST, and should be expected to give joe (or any other LT) a heck of a day.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2008 9:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hate the same people I’ve hated for a long time:

Art Modell
The Baltimore Ravens
The Pittsburgh Steelers
John Elway
The Denver Broncos
Announcers who call an end-around a reverse and call a reverse a double reverse
Michigan
The New York Yankees
Onions
Mushrooms
People who drive while talking on the cell phone
People who don’t signal their intention to turn or change lanes

I don’t hate the Browns. I don’t hate Braylon Edwards, Crennel, etc. Am I disappointed? Yes, but I can’t hate my team and their players.

by woodsmeister on Nov 24, 2008 10:33 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

You hate mushrooms?

Rec.

by joeee on Nov 24, 2008 10:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gregg Easterbrook hates onions?

You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on Nov 24, 2008 10:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hate the assumption that Cowher could show up and, chin jutting, spit flying, instantly turn the franchise around.

Let’s be honest – every complaint that the next coach needs to be an experienced head coach and not a coordinator is a plea for Cowher. Unless you want Jim Fassel or Art Shell or Wayne Fontes or Brian Billick, because that’s who’s out there.

by exposition on Nov 24, 2008 10:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Don’t forget Marty.

I just hate it when people want a new coach and then complain about that new coach’s flaws when he gets here.

“Marty wants to run the ball too much, what a boring offense!”

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 11:44 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

couldn’t agree more. if cowher comes to town, there will be plenty of people bitching about him too, probably a lot of those clamoring to get him.

all new coaches are great until they start losing. they’re just like draft picks, who are great until they stink on the field.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 25, 2008 11:56 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That said, I DO believe that it’s time for Romeo to go. His clock management, his decisions on when to kick a FG and when to go for 6, his loyalty to Anderson and baffling benching of Quinn – these are SPECIFIC examples of things that a head coach is DIRECTLY responsible for, and he has failed miserably at them all.

by exposition on Nov 25, 2008 12:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I drew the line with the benching of Quinn so soon. Its one thing to bench a guy, but when you give everyone else 1000 chances and Brady gets 2 3/4…that’s a little unfair, isn’t it?

It still could be the finger, but he at least should have SAID it was 100% the broken finger.

He isn’t exactly keeping the locker room together either.

by rufio on Nov 25, 2008 1:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It feels like Crennel thinks that the players will do the right thing and work hard because they ought to. He seems like an unrealistically nice guy. I appreciate that he seems to take a long view approach, but this really is too much. I hesitate to say he’s a bad coach, but I certainly don’t feel like he’s lighting as many fires under as many asses as he can to pull the team together. We absolutely have to stop the quarterback drama. I’m not sure Quinn is all that people want to believe him to be, but if you make the decision to play him, live with the consequences. Mark the line in the sand.

I miss Joe Jurevicius. When Winslow was covered and Braylon was dropping, Joe was the reliable third option. He kept their defense honest and made our offense multi-dimensional.

I think Braylon has to really believe that the team is doing well in order for him to do well. Otherwise he feels like it isn’t worth his effort. Like a lesser T.O.

I hope this loss propels the team to pull together, put in some extra practice, and focus. If the coaches aren’t running things well, take it on your own shoulders. And I hope the coaches take a little more of a military no-one-comes-down-this-hill-alive stance. This is do or die time for the whole organization not just the present team.

by mprewett on Nov 25, 2008 3:07 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

I hate it all.

I hate that this team is pretty much back at square one. An old running back, what now looks like a weak group of receivers (led by an All-Pro who has developed a football-phobia, a washout of a fee agent signing and a gutsy guy who can’t stay healthy), a “me first” all pro tight end who is one hard hit away from retirement, a horrific defence and a coaching staff that is completely clueless. And we will be heading into the 2009 season led by a QB with 9 quarters of NFL experience.

So what’s good? I still like the offensive line, so there is a kind of a foundation there…

But realistically, this is a team that has to be gutted and not fine tuned. Last year was an illusion, and this year has been a return to the crap football that we have become used to.

If I may paraphrase the great 80’s band Squeeze: “If I didn’t love the Browns, I’d hate them.”

by Pruitt on Nov 27, 2008 4:02 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Just wanted to say that I appreciate all of the great contributions you guys have been making, even with another down season. I’ve had less time in my schedule to write weekly content the past several weeks, but all (well, most, lol) of your guys’ community discussions/bonding have made this site grow tremendously.

Thank you for the dedication — I know some of you have sent your thoughts to me in emails too. Even if I didn’t respond to your email, please know that I read it and considered everything suggested.

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by ChrisPokorny on Nov 27, 2008 11:04 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

Start posting about the Browns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Pryor_small
ESPN reports that Lerner wants Holmgren
Small
An SF Bay Area Sports fan commiserates
Dbn_small
DBN: Help Wanted
Logo_ksu1_small
Second Thing to Be Settled After GM Fiasco
Bernie_small
Ryan for Head Coach
Erie_dawgs_logo_small
Hire mooncamping!
Logo_ksu1_small
Accorsi and Kosar New GMs?
Biggamebob_small
Classless Chickenshirt Move
Jim-tressel-ohio-state_small
Browns Reportedly Fire Kokinis
Small
Maybe this makes sense

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Browns Links


Executive Editor

Dbn_small ChrisPokorny

Minions

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Moderators

Pryor_small Buckeye Brad