Dawgs By Nature: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Coyotes Ink Aucoin to One Year Deal


spread the word

Revenge in Store Against the Indianapolis Colts

Oh, you thought something changed since 11 months ago? Think again.

On January 2, 2008, several days after the 2007-2008 regular season ended, I circled this Sunday's date on my calendar: a shot at the Indianapolis Colts.

It's no secret that I am a fan of the Indianapolis Colts, when you consider NFL teams that I like besides the Cleveland Browns. Most, if not all of that, has to do with how "cool" Peyton Manning operates at the quarterback position. In turn, he makes the rest of the Colts "cool" in my mind. Heading into Week 17 last season, all the Browns needed was for the Colts to defeat an offensively-challenged Tennessee Titans team, and we would've made the playoffs.

The Colts played Jim Sorgi most of the game. Tony Dungy conceded to a division rival. Think of it this way: even if the Browns had clinched a first-round bye for the playoffs, would you really want us to lay down against the Pittsburgh Steelers so they could make the playoffs? No way. That's what the Colts did.

"Hey! Don't blame me, I couldn't even quarterback the Lions!"

After my initial rant (link above), Brad Wells from over at Stampede Blue called for Cleveland fans to stop whining. From what I've read over the months, his feelings about the situation haven't changed. Neither have mine.

Spoiler alert: this Sunday, I am picking the Colts to defeat the Browns. For the first time in several years though, I don't want the Colts to win. I don't care if it sounds bitter, because there is justification behind it -- I want to see Tony Dungy look up at the scoreboard as the clock reads 0:00 and see the Browns with a "W". Last year, we were hoping that this game would mean something to the Colts -- like maybe it would hurt their chances at a division title. Well, there hopes for a division title are slim to none, but there's something even more important on the line: their playoff hopes.

A loss by the Colts will likely remove them from the fifth of sixth playoff seeds for a week or two. We already upset Eli Manning's New York Giants at home this season. Can we do the same to Peyton Manning's Indianapolis Colts? I hope so.

Poll
Do you still want revenge due to last season's Week 17 effort by the Indianapolis Colts?
Yes, I want revenge on the Colts!
63 votes
No, that was never a big deal to me.
34 votes
No, at the time I did, but now I don't really care about "revenge".
19 votes

116 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs | Comment 20 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I still stand by my arguments that I made last season. People will blame the Browns for “not winning” when it counted. But in a short season, every game in a 16 game season counts equally. We got hosed in two games against Oakland and Arizona that should have been counted as wins. To fault the Browns for not winning on the road against a 7-9 team takes away from the point that what the Colts did was despicable. When playoffs are determined by second tie-breakers and the like, we need the league and its teams to act with integrity. For a team to not put their best effort forward in a 16 GAME SEASON even if for one game is a disgrace. I am still irate over this. This season proves that you have to take advantage of any season that presents itself as a playoff opportunity because you never know what will happen the following year

by Roger Dorn on Nov 28, 2008 11:49 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Let me clarify when I say the Arizona and Oakland games should have counted as wins. What I meant was that we were two rule intepretations in our favor from winning those two games, obviously they shouldn’t have counted in the win column

by Roger Dorn on Nov 28, 2008 11:50 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Totally agree with integrity

That has been the cornerstone of the NFL for 88 years and yet we have seen an erosion in the past year. My team (Pittsburgh) just had 7 points taken off the board against San Diego when everyone admitted that was cleary a mistake on the last play of the game. The NFL goes back all the time and changes statistics after reviewing film. Why not do the same with the score, which is the most important statistic of them all. I know a Browns web site is not going to ever be sympathetic toward Pittsburgh, but what if those points determine a tiebreaker, which they may well end up doing? What a travesty that would be, all because the NFK doesn’t want to disrupt the gamblers by changing the final score.

Back to the Browns situation, what happened last year is not much better then the Colts simply refusing to play. Think of the travesty of that happening, which in essence is what happened. The NFL has been two-faced in the integrity game recently. Guys are getting fined for legal blocks and yet when Matt Light pulls some guy’s hair in a fight, there is no suspension. The league better re-evaluate both its standards and consistencies.

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Nov 28, 2008 12:21 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don’t really understand this. The Colts did what every team in their position would have done. They rested key starters to get ready for the playoffs because they had nothing left to play for in the regular season. You can fault the NFL for setting up the rules and allowing this to happen, but I don’t think you can really blame the Colts for using common sense. It sucks when it happens to your team, but at the same time it is the right move to make.

I’m also a Steelers fan as I’m sure someone will point out, but that doesn’t really have anything to do with what I am saying.

by Cols714 on Nov 28, 2008 12:37 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Absolutely correct, blaming some other team for your failure to lock up a playoff spot while you still had control, is dillusional. Let this go.

by elsandito on Nov 28, 2008 12:49 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Should the Colts really have rested their players though? They lost to the Chargers in their only game last postseason, and a lot of it to me appeared to be rust.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 28, 2008 1:09 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I voted for holding a grudge and wanting the Browns to hopefully be that one loss the Colts can look back on saying “Damn, shoulda had that”. I completely agree about the integrity aspect. RD summed up fairly well how I feel about it.

On the other hand, less and less do I buy the argument that the Browns should have taken care of business in the Cincy game. They played their A-team, but performed like a B-team that day. Cincy threw their A-team out there and played well enough to win. If the Bengals had given up on the season and thrown out a bunch of former scout-team players and the Browns lost, then I’ll buy that the Browns failed to lock it up themselves. Fact is, Tennessee got to play a pivotal game against a B-team that normally would have had the bejeezus kicked out of them by the Colts A-team.

If it was for health reasons that players were benched, that’s fine. But if they were well enough to start the game and play 3 possessions or so, they’re well enough to play the entire game. I’m still on the fence if I’m more pissed at the Colts, or frustrated that the Titans had it easier.

You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on Nov 28, 2008 12:59 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Browns beat the Bengals, DA doesn’t throw 65 picks, this dicussion is not taking place.
Take care of your own schedule is my motto.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 28, 2008 5:56 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Browns – “We had to play in 16 games where the opposing team tried to win.”
The Titans – “We had to play in 15 games where the opposing team tried to win.”

The Browns – “We finished with the same record as you.”
The Titans – “But we were the ones who made the playoffs.”

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by ChrisPokorny on Nov 28, 2008 6:23 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

The Browns – "We had to play in 16 games where the opposing team tried to win."
The Titans – "We had to play in 15 games where the opposing team tried to win."

Exactly my point, in less words and with more oomph.

You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on Nov 28, 2008 6:48 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

AND! A rule interpretation beat us in the Arizona game. AND! We knocked a winning field goal through against Oakland that was negated due to the dumb timeout rule.

I can’t overemphasize important it is for every game to be treated equally in a really short season like in the NFL. The second you compromise even 1 game as unfair and then rely on second and third tiebreakers, then I have a big issue with the system.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 28, 2008 7:03 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We failed to send a team to the playoffs that couldnt take care of the Bengals. Boofknhoo. It’s not as though we stood any chance to win a playoff game playing like that. There’s no sense going to the playoffs if you can’t win a playoff game.

by elsandito on Nov 28, 2008 8:17 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Browns did not make the playoffs because they did not beat the Raiders or the Bengals, two teams LAST year they were better than. I don’t give a rats tail what Dungy did, HIS team qualified, The Browns did not. Lets reverse the rolls why don’t we, DA and our starters would have played a series of football than sat. Every other freaking coach in the NFL would of done the same what Dungy did.
 Could you imagine the hell that would of been rained down on Dungy if he played Peyton for a series and he rolls his ankle and is out for the playoffs?
 Also no mention of the Dawson field goal that was reviewed against the Ravens, when that play should not of been reviewed according to the officials the following day.
 And obviously the Titans are taking care of business this year as a playoff team, and the Browns, well I don’t have to tell you what our team is like.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 28, 2008 11:36 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It is important to take every game seriously in the NFL, which is why we should have just beaten the Raiders and the Bengals. Those two teams were HORRIBLE last year, and players admitted that they didn’t take those teams seriously even with playoff hopes on the line. A team that doesn’t take care of business week in and week out doesn’t deserve to make the playoffs.

Yes, it sucks we didn’t make the playoffs last year, but it makes me a lot more angry that we had control of our own destiny and dropped the ball than that someone rested their starters to get ready for the playoffs. You have to expect a team to act in it’s own self interest and you can’t count on other teams to win to put you in the playoffs. If we were 11-5, none of us give a damn about the Colts/Titans.

If we were playing the Steelers in week 17, no way I would want anyone irreplaceable to play. There are cheap shots thrown all the time in that game and I wouldn’t want someone A. getting hurt or B. doing something stupid and getting a suspension.

Is it total BS that we had the same record as the Titans and didn’t make the playoffs? Yes. Do we blame the Colts for acting (in what they thought was) their own best interest? Hell no. If “integrity” meant trying to win every game by as much as you can and never thinking beyond that one game, college teams wouldn’t take out their starters after a game gets ugly. That sort of short-sighted thinking keeps teams where they are instead of allowing them to play better when it counts.

Getting to play Cincinnati twice a year is like getting to play 14 games against opponents who don’t want to win. You could say the same thing about Detroit.

You have to worry about your own schedule. Do you think the Dolphins and Jets and the Bills were complaining last year because they had to play NE twice? EVERYONE PLAYS A DIFFERENT SCHEDULE. If we were in the NFC West last year, we would have made the playoffs easily. We weren’t. We knew the schedule we were playing, we were in control, and WE blew it.

Rules mess ups/bad rules/bad calls happen. If we didn’t need a last second FG against Oakland, we win despite timeout tactics. If Dawson makes it the second time, we don’t have a problem. If K2 makes the same play against Arizona this year, the rule is changed and there is no way its a TD. We should have just been up by multiple scores (or at all) against either team and won.

Winning this game against the Colts won’t change what happened in the past, and it won’t put us in the playoffs this year. I would love to finish at least 6-10, and this is a game we can win. It would almost be disappointing to see our players play out of their minds (every thing else being the same) in this game because that would mean they weren’t properly motivated over the course of the season and that’s just terrible. Saving that “little extra” for revenge means you aren’t playing 100% every week, which is inexcusable.

Its BS for the Colts blogger to say this as an outsider, but as a Browns fan I feel OK about it: stop whining. Everyone.

by rufio on Nov 28, 2008 8:15 PM EST reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Good Post.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Nov 28, 2008 11:39 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Bengals were 7-9 last year, not horrible by any stretch of the imagination. Just because they have 1 win this year does not mean there is any relation to last year’s team. It’s tough to play on the road against a decent team in the NFL.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2008 8:49 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The responses in this thread are hilarious and sad at the same time. haha :(

The King of Anti-Fail and Unofficial Moderator of Stupid People

by KingRichard on Nov 28, 2008 9:50 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Both Ways

First, the Browns would never have need the Colts to win if the Browns had taken care of business in Cincy. (Thanks, Chud.)

If the Browns were in the same position that the Colts were in last year, I don’t know if I would have wanted them to pull their starters out like that or not. The rational side of me says do it, but the sporting side says go out there and get another W. Besides, if the Browns were playing their second string in that situation, I can’t help but think that some freak sideline incident would take the starters out and kill the post-season anyways. (No. Think positive!)

Ultimately, though, the Browns missed the playoffs because the Colts lost and that’s good enough for me. I voted for – though don’t expect to savor – revenge.

by JustBob on Nov 29, 2008 4:11 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well...

I do find it a bit sad that some Browns fans are still bitter about what happened last year. You can’t blame another team for your inability to make the playoffs. The Colts did what was in their best interest and that was to protect the starters for the playoffs.

Put yourself in the Colts shoes: if you have a player of Peyton Manning’s calabre would you want him to risk injury in a meaningless game, simply because you want to protect the integrity of the game? Before you give a homer response to that question, re-read it and actually think before you answer.

Some fans understand the position the Colts were in last year, however others that are blinded by their excessive passion and loyalty, need to build a bridge and get over it, because it’s just sad to hear them whine like this.

Now that i’ve got that off my chest, I’m looking forward to today’s game. I think you guys are much better then your record indiactes and that the game will be much closer then most people think. Here’s to a good game.

by AussieColtsFan on Nov 30, 2008 7:07 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m glad you did what was best for your club last year and got beat in your first game of the playoffs. You might want to re-think that whole what’s best for your club thing, because the Colts looked terrible against the Chargers last year in the playoffs. Not even taking the Browns into consideration, it was the wrong choice. Your offense was rusty and out of synch that entire game.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2008 8:51 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

Start posting about the Browns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Buffalo-bills-logo_small
Who is the Browns best Kick Returner and MLB of all time?
Louis-nix_small
Practice Squad
Rufiohookgrin01_small
What do you want to see me do?
Louis-nix_small
Madden 10 Browns
Rookie_minicamp09-17--nfl_medium_540_360_small
AFC North 09-10 Standings Predictions
7782_small
Merriman in 2010?
Img
Mangini Being Too Hard on Rookies, Not A Chance!
Image_021_small
2002 Browns: How, Why?
Brownself_small
quinn question
Small
2009 Bengals

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Browns Links


Executive Editor

Dbn_small ChrisPokorny

Minions

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports