Shaun Smith punched Quinn in the face
As they like to say, it would be funny if it weren't so sad
10 months ago
Roger Dorn
36 comments
0 recs |
Comments
There is a really funny joke in here somewhere.
by gahnki on Dec 22, 2008 9:28 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
yep…you’re gonna hear a lot of “well he finally got to a quarterback” jokes
by VABrownsFan on Dec 22, 2008 9:35 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
What a surprise, more nonsense from this bunch. And Romeo stated " He can right the ship" if given the chance at the Monday news conference.
I am a loss for words.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Dec 22, 2008 9:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Finally some signs of life from this team. As I’ve previously said, the best thing that could have happened to this team was a pregame ritual starting game 1 where someone walked about to DA and punched him in the chest.
by gentryholdem on Dec 22, 2008 10:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
“I have said that since Day 1, that I will be judged on the wins and losses. That’s what you’re judged on as a coach.”
by Pruitt on Dec 23, 2008 8:16 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Signs of chaos and anger from a ship without a captain. You have to believe that if Cowher were the coach here he would have leveled them both.
by danvail on Dec 23, 2008 9:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Right, Cowher would have done more than bench the one guy that could play and then say he wouldn’t discuss it. Cowher definitely would have just aired everything in public and humiliated both guys and lost the respect of the players. Yep, that’s what Cowher would have done.
The Cowher inanity is getting old. This team sucks, no one coach changes that.
by fwembt on Dec 23, 2008 1:26 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
If it’s true that Crennel allows players to sleep during meetings and that Smith is the primary culprit, then yes i would say the current coach is a huge part of the problem (rumor and speculation)
by Roger Dorn on Dec 23, 2008 5:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I am no longer arguing that Crennel isn’t part of the problem. It’s just naive to think that Cowher is the one cure to this.
by fwembt on Dec 23, 2008 5:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That wasn’t meant to be read literally, but it speaks clearly to what I think one of Crennel’s problems is. He’s a wuss. His players are out of control, and all he’s doing is not tattling and putting one in timeout.
I honestly think that if ANY strong minded coach, Cowher, Coughlin, etc were here, this incident probably never would have happened in the first place.
This team does not suck. They’re playing exactly how I’d expect a talented team with nothing to play for, no leadership, a boatload of injuries, and a 3rd string quarterback to play. I’m sick of the emo, defeatist attitude that says everything sucks.
by danvail on Dec 23, 2008 6:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If you’ve read anything I have written you would recognize that I am not “emo,defeatist” about this. The simple fact is that we lack talent on this team. You can dance around it all you want but we are a team comprised of players that are not very talented. That’s the biggest part of the problem here. The team that took the field against the Bengals sucks.
Position by Position:
QB: Three quarterbacks so far this year. None of them have played well. Anderson was good against NY, Quinn was pretty good against Denver. That’s it.
RB: Lewis is washed up and runs with the force of an old lady. Harrison is a good third down back, but not more than that. Wright is Travis Prentice.
WR: Edwards is certainly an above average talent. Stallworth is probably league average when healthy. Steptoe is abysmal and Cribbs is underused.
TE: Winslow might be the best player on the team. Heiden is very serviceable in his own right. Dinkins is below average, Rucker is, I think, just a rumor.
OL: Thomas and Steinbach are pretty good, though it is possible Thomas does not deserve the Pro Bowl this year. Those two are islands amongst a false-starting sea.
DL: Rogers.
LB: Jackson is good, but not above average. Davis and McGinest are nearly useless. Wimbley is intriguing but not good.
DB: Pool and Wright are showing flashes. Jones and McDonald seem to be treading water. Wright could possibly be above league average at his spot.
ST: All three are very good. God knows they get their practice.
So that’s it. Where is the world class talent that makes this team so good? It isn’t there. Edwards, Winslow, Thomas, Steinbach, Rogers, and very charitably, Wright are better than the average player at their position. Not only that, they are not even surround by league average talent.
by fwembt on Dec 23, 2008 7:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't agree more
What is danvail saying when he claims that this is a “talented team” and that fwembt is “emo” and “defeatist”.
I’ve been watching football for a hell of a long time… long enough to know a bad team when I see one.
And my friend this team is crap.
Good teams don’t go 5 games without offensive touchdowns. Talented teams don’t get shut at at home by a rival that has 2 wins in week 16.
It’s not “defeatist” to put things bluntly.
Two types of fans make me scratch my head – the type that points out how many close games their team lost and the type that wears rose coloured glasses.
by Pruitt on Dec 24, 2008 12:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, there are teams with less talent than what you mentioned here that are winning games right now. The Dolphins and Falcons come to mind
by Roger Dorn on Dec 24, 2008 1:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They surround their above average talent with league average or better players. We have above average and below average, no supporting cast.
by fwembt on Dec 24, 2008 1:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
THat “supporting cast” on teams like the Dolphins and Falcons aren’t any better than guys like Harrison, Vickers, Fraley, Hadnot, Tucker, Stallworth, Cribbs, Quinn (don’t try to tell me he has less talent that Pennington), S. Smith, R. Smith, Williams, Wimbley, Jackson, McDonald, Jones, and Pool. All guys that you say aren’t above average. Fine. But they are NFL caliber starters. And I’d bet many of them start on teams like Miami, Atlanta, Denver, Baltimore, Chicago, Minnesota, Philadelphia and other fringy playoff teams. This team is underprepared, outschemed, unfocused, and poorly managed. Shake in some senseless contraversies, devestating injuries and a tough schedule, and you get a 4 win season. Overall talent on the 53-man is way down on the list of our problems.
by DaytonDogg on Dec 26, 2008 12:47 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I want to respond in some detail on the talent, but I don’t have a lot of time right now. Two quick, basic points, though.
1) I think there is a bit more talent here than you indicate.
2) I think this talent is extremely misused and has given up both on the season and on the current regime.
Who did we really lose from 2007 to 2008 talent-wise (not talking about injuries). There’s a 6 win differential. I’m not saying this is a superbowl team, but the quote “This team sucks, no one coach changes that” implies two things: first, that my previous comment was to be read literally and I think that Cowher can come in and everything will be perfect (which is of course silly and an assumption) and second, that this team is so bad that it can’t be turned around in a year (which again, is silly as there are two teams this year that demonstrate otherwise).
Merry Christmas guys, I’ll respond some more nest week.
by danvail on Dec 24, 2008 11:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
At some point we have to stop operating on the theoretical and get down to reality. This is a four win team. You tell me there is enough talent here to be in the playoffs. I tell you that we have won four games, not scored a touchdown since the Buffalo game and played defense horribly back when it actually mattered. 4-11 is the reality, talent is just wishful thinking.
by fwembt on Dec 24, 2008 1:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Another reality is that we have our 3rd/4th string QB starting 1/4 of the season.
Another reality is we have the 14th ranked defense in football (tied w/ the Chicago Bears, who certainly don’t have any talent on the defensive side of the ball… sarc).
The fact is that we were 4-7 with an actual NFL player at QB, and with about 5 plays going the other way we could (should, with better in game decision making) have been 6-5 or 7-4.
by kwoog on Dec 24, 2008 5:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Coaching in the NFL is more important than any other league. A good coach can turn a really bad team in a good wildcard contending team. (A Bradyless Pats team, Dolphins, Falcons, Baltimore, and Tampa.) a bad coach can derail a talented team (Chargers, Browns, Jax and Seattle (Just because Holmgren has had his foot out the door).
Thanks to the salary cap almost all teams are close talent wise. The key is finding draft steals and spending free agency money well.
The Browns are not a talentless team. They have Big Baby, Braylon (the kid is talented), K2, Joe Thomas, Stienbach, D’Qwell (Has really turned it up lately) and Wright. They have young talented players. They have not played up to the levels this year that we expected but they have the talent.
Look at what Atlanta is doing this year (I live here in Atlanta so I get a up close look), they have built around some talented veterans Abraham, Brooking, and Roddy White. They have then spent money on a very good RB in Turner. Then they drafted well in getting an awesome young QB in Matt Ryan. They are not a more talented team than the Browns. They are simply getting MORE out of their talent than the Browns this year.
by Bernie19Kosar on Dec 24, 2008 5:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with most of this. I don’t think Jacksonville has a bad coach though.
by DaytonDogg on Dec 26, 2008 12:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In a less argumentative line, you bring up a good point about two teams (Miami and Atlanta) turning things around quickly. So what can we learn from them? I didn’t pay too much attention to what they did in the off season. What changes can/must the Browns make to see such a turn around? The ’07 Browns seemed to have turned things around, but everyone seems to agree that was just the result of a soft schedule.
by JustBob on Dec 24, 2008 5:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
1. A defensive scheme that works against teams above the level of the “little 8” Big 10 teams.
2. Play young talented kids. (Harrison, et al)
3. Have an offensive identity. Chud lost his this year. Playcalling and gameplans were 1/2 for Quinn and 1/2 for DA.
4. Quit trying to stick a round peg in a square hole. Steptoe can not block effectively at an NFL level. Jamal Lewis isn’t going to be able to bounce runs outside late in the season on crappy turf if he can at all anymore. Rucker is a better slot reciever than Dinkins. Corey Williams needs some one-gap scheming to get to the QB. Kamerion Wimbley needs to be set up to be unblocked to get to the QB. Andra Davis isn’t agile enough to match up with Marshawn Lynch….
5. Don’t let everyone’s heads sink when things start going awry.
6. Don’t let anyone think they are talented enough to slack off during the offseason
7. Don’t let fans have anyone’s email address.
8. Do get Braylon’s eyesight checked (although he is dropless in 2+ weeks!)
9. Do trade down in the 1st round and aquire a 3rd or 4th round pick. Also make a decision on a QB and end the controversy.
10. Get 1 or more NFL caliber WRs. JJ coming back counts. A young guy wouldn’t hurt.
by rufio on Dec 25, 2008 12:30 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If McDonald hasn’t shown you “flashes” yet, I have no idea what you are looking at. Yes, he has been beaten his fair share of times this year. Some of that was failures by the safeties (Denver), some of that was our inability to get pressure on the QB (almost every game), and some of that is the fact that he is a young, streaky player who needs to mature.
Maybe he never becomes a starter, but I can only think of one team in the NFL who has a better 3rd CB than McDonald and that is Philly. As I understand it, one of those guys are out of there next year and Samuel is making waaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyy too much money.
Looking at the history of the draft the last 10 years, it is pretty remarkable how FEW corners selected after the 2nd round actually become good players. We should be grateful we got someone with his potential in the 5th round.
by rufio on Dec 25, 2008 12:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also
Saying that Cribbs is underused isn’t helping your argument that we lack talent. He clearly is talented.
Joe Jurevicious is underrated and a vital part of our offense if he is 90%+ of what he used to be.
Again, Rucker being inactive is more of a indictment against Romeo than a clear display of the lack of talent on the team. Our TEs are way above average. Dallas and San Diego might have better 1-2 combos.
Fraley is old, and I have no idea what is wrong with Schaffer, but Ryan Tucker is another name you fail to mention. If he is back at 80%+ of what he used to be he is a more than capable starter in this league. He was the glue that held it all together. Last year, people were claiming we had the best line in all of football. Centers are easy to find.
Wimbley has potential and they do not use him well at all in the defensive schemes. Jackson needs a 1A so he can be the 1B, not the other way around. Hall showed promise.
You are joking if you don’t think we have an NFL QB on the roster. Joking. They played horribly this year and I am not defending that. But if you don’t see talent there….are you serious? Talent doesn’t mean much if it doesn’t result in performance, but there is a heckuva lot of talent and ability at QB and on the entire roster versus 1999-2004.
by rufio on Dec 25, 2008 12:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cribbs is talented, but he is not much of a WR. He’s a great return man, probably the best. I gave him that. JJ is a huge if and cannot possibly be counted.
We have no idea how good Rucker is but to claim he is above average when he has barely played is absurd. Heiden is good, but he’s not “way above average.” That’s nothing more than homerism.
Again, Tucker is hurt and has been rather frequently. He needs to play consistently to be above average. We have no real, recent gauge of his ability.
Our linebackers are all lacking. Read anything, by anyone, and you will see that. If Wimbley requires just the right scheme to work, he’s a one trick pony, not an above average player.
We may have an NFL QB on the roster and we may not. You saw them play and yet still insist that they are tremendously talented. Where was it? Let me guess, it was coaching or scheme or something like that. Both were woefully inaccurate and only managed two good games between them. Real talent overcomes problems. We cannot do that. We are not that good.
by fwembt on Dec 25, 2008 2:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think, as in most things in life, that there is a middle ground between Rufio’s and your own viewpoint.
There is significant talent on the team, but there are also gaping holes that prevent success.
by gahnki on Dec 25, 2008 10:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the thing that makes Heiden above average is that he is not, to borrow your phrase, a one trick pony. He’s a good (perhaps even very good) blocker and a good receiver, whereas Winslow doesn’t seem to function well as anything but a receiver. Heiden is more likely to catch a defense off guard when he goes out, and if the pass is good, he usually makes the catch.
I always thought he was above average as a full-spectrum TE, but I will admit that as far as other teams are concerned I only hear about their TEs when their receiving and I can’t claim any knowledge of their blocking.
I guess what I’m saying is that the question of whether Heiden is above average has to be put in the context of complete TEs rather than just comparing him to the receiving specialists.
The only downside I see to him is that he’s been in the trenches for about ten years now, and I’m not sure how much more pounding he can take.
by JustBob on Dec 26, 2008 4:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I am not trying to claim Heiden is an above average #1 TE in the league. I am trying to point out a place where that “supporting cast” is strong on our roster.
Winslow AND Heiden, as a 1-2 combo are an above average PAIR. They can both be used on the field at the same time. San Diego uses Malemaleuna and Gates at the same time with great effectiveness in a way similar to how we SHOULD use Winslow and Heiden.
This is one of many examples of how what talent there is on our roster has been misused this year.
Cribbs is an above average return man, gunner, kickoff coverer, and he has his own offensive package and is the only reason that we can run outside. He comes in motion and blocks down on a DE, allowing out OT to get upfield and block on the 2nd level. He does a lot for the team and I don’t even think that can be argued. Could he be an above average reciever or RB? I have no idea because the coaches don’t want to give him that chance.
If you can’t see that Tucker is a very good NFL lineman when he is in, you don’t know what you are looking at. Yes, he has been injured often lately, but that is not a reflection on his talent. Talent only matters when it is on the field, sure, but he is still talented.
JJ has said he guarantees he will play next year, and that is good enough for me. He is not a long term option and might not be any good when he gets back, fair.
You can’t win in the NFL if you don’t put your players in position to succeed. Period. Scheme and coaching are very important to a player’s success. You have to put your players in position to succeed. If we had a coach that decided to start Shaun Rogers at CB and move Eric Wright to DT, I don’t think either one would look very good. It hasn’t been quite that bad this year, but its been bad.
You are crazy if you think a talented team can’t miss the playoffs or that a team with no talent can’t make the playoffs. There is anecdotal evidence of this everywhere (Seattle, Possibly San Diego, Denver, Miami, New England, NYJ, Dallas, Chicago, Atlanta, all just this year).
Do we have 22 guys who should be making the Pro Bowl? No. Do we need more talent? Absolutely, particularly anyone who can rush the passer.
What a player (or a team) is capable of doing is not the same as what he (or his team) has done. Don’t get me wrong, outside of the NYG game this year we have been pretty terrible, and I don’t expect that to change on Sunday. Our record is terrible, and a few of the players on our team are terrible. There is a good solid core of talent on this team, and we are capable of doing a lot more than we did this year.
by rufio on Dec 26, 2008 11:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think I can agree with most of that. I just see a huge disconnect between the supposed talent and what actually gets done. At what point do you say that maybe these guys just aren’t very good?
by fwembt on Dec 27, 2008 12:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Smith was angered because Quinn was showing up the rest of the team by failing to suck big time. BQ needs to learn to be more of a team player. If the rest of the team looks horrible, he needs to take their cue and look just as horrible. I salute Smith for doing the dirty work.
by elsandito on Dec 23, 2008 2:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’m honestly embarassed to be a Browns fan after reading that. Not because of the play on the field (….which leaves a bit to be desired), but…now we’re acting like a bunch of assholes and douchebags off the field.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Dec 23, 2008 5:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You can’t punch Brady Quinn. His face is maybe the most valuable thing the franchise has.
by mpstable on Dec 23, 2008 9:56 PM EST reply actions 4 recs

















