Dawgs By Nature: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: SEC Basketball at the Half

Browns Clinch No. 5 Pick in Draft

By virtue of the Cleveland Browns losing their final six games, the fact that the Cincinnati Bengals suddenly won their final three games after starting 1-11-1, and the fact that the Oakland Raiders defeated the playoff bound Tampa Bay Buccaneers in Week 17, we will benefit come April.

Cleveland, intitially slated to have the No. 7 overall pick in April heading into the Week, will now draft fifth overall barring a trade. Having a first-round draft pick will make the draft a lot more exciting than this year's draft, when we didn't have a pick until the fourth round.

Here are the top five teams that will draft...

  1. Detroit Lions
  2. St. Louis Rams
  3. Kansas City Chiefs
  4. Seattle Seahawks
  5. Cleveland Browns

We do not have a third-round pick or a fifth-round pick in 2009.

0 recs  |  Comment 93 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The consensus seems to be that two of the top picks will be Matthew Stafford and Sam Bradford, and I could see any of the top three teams drafting a quarterback, so the Browns will probably get one of the three best non-QB prospects. I’d bet a guy like Crabtree will be available to the Browns at 5; the question will be if the Browns should take him. I know many people don’t like taking a reciever that high, but Crabtree is a very talented prospect with game-changing abilities. Pairing him up with Edwards would give the Browns a very explosive receiving duo that would be fun to watch and give a much-needed boost to our offense. That opportunity would be hard to pass up.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 28, 2008 8:28 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Matt Cassel’s future could have a huge impact on the top of the draft too, it will be interesting to watch.

by Roger Dorn on Dec 28, 2008 8:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And by corollary, Tom Brady’s knee could have a huge impact

by danvail on Dec 29, 2008 10:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

REY. MAUALUGA.

Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.

by BringBackKosar on Dec 28, 2008 8:36 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

BRIAN. ORAKPO.

by exposition on Dec 28, 2008 9:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Orakpo is an absolute monster of a player.

by DisplacedBuckeye on Dec 28, 2008 9:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ll take either, or Hughes from TCU, or that kid from Penn St. Unless one of them makes a monster showing at the combine (and none of the others do) I think we could drop back in the draft and get any one of them.

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not at 5, way too high for him.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 28, 2008 9:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

With Stafford and Bradford potentially available as well as franchise tackles in Andre Smith and Eugene Monroe, this is a year when I think the Browns could get significant value by trading down. It will be interesting to see where the consensus sets the bar as far as the top group of talent. If you add Crabtree to the four names above, it might be comparatively easy to get good value and turn the 5th overall pick into two first rounders or a first rounder and two seconds.

Time for me to go look and see who has multiple first or second round picks.

by NickFantana on Dec 28, 2008 9:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

People always say that, but it’s really hard to trade down. Teams don’t usually want to give up draft picks. Unless the Browns get a big offer, I’d like to see them stay there and take a game-changing player like Crabtree.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 28, 2008 9:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Ravens did it last year (but then lost most of what they gained by trading back up).

We could trade down if we take less than what that stupid value sheet says we should. Crabtree is going to be good. I would like to see him run the 40 before I think he is going to be as unreal in the NFL as he is right now.

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Totally agree about the value sheet. People rely way too much on that for making decisions, especially when it comes to getting “fair value” when trading down from a top-5 pick.

by kwoog on Dec 29, 2008 11:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would do my damnest to trade down, difficult yes, however this team needs picks.
 Just at the top of my head, 2 linebackers, at least 1 DL, running back, cornerback and another receiver. The best defensive player available in my book if the Browns stay at 5.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Dec 28, 2008 10:02 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

That’s what I thought a month ago, but it’s obvious that the Browns need offensive help too. Take the best player available regardless of position (except QB). As much as I love Beanie Wells and think he’ll make a great pro, you can’t take a running back at 5 — you can find those later in the draft.

I know it’s really hard to trade down, as I mentioned above, but the Browns may be able to do it if there’s a team enamored with Crabtree or one of the QB’s falls there. If the Browns do trade down, I’d love for them to take Jenkins then pick up a LB later in the first. Then they can find a RB and WR in the later rounds.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 28, 2008 10:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My gut says Crabtree goes no later than #4 to Seattle

by Roger Dorn on Dec 28, 2008 10:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is absolutely correct. Seattle would not pass on him, I don’t believe.

by NickFantana on Dec 28, 2008 11:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

True, it would be hard for the Seahawks to pass. Damn.

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I want to go back and correct myself here a little. I’ve now seen several mock drafts that suggest the Seahawks need defensive help more than they need a WR and their GM is a defense-first guy. So I shouldn’t have been as absolute as I sounded originally.

by NickFantana on Dec 30, 2008 9:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There would be no way I would pass on him at #4 if I were them. No way.

by rufio on Dec 30, 2008 11:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not that you are wrong, just that they would be stupid.

by rufio on Dec 30, 2008 11:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Two players in the first?

First, what team would have two players to give, and secondly, who in their right mind would trade two first round picks for one, albeit higher? I’m not being a smart-alec. I thought the only way a team could feasibly have two first round picks is if they trade a future away (a la Quinn).

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Dec 28, 2008 11:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think conceivably he meant like Dallas had two lower first round picks this year (ours and their own) that thye could trade both #1s to move up into the Top 5.

As far as I can tell, the only team that currently has two 1st rounders next year is Detroit, so obviously that scenario does not apply here.

And, if a team wanted to trade their number 1 this year, and their number 1 next year, I think we would have to listen to the offer.

Just as an FYi, it looks like the Giants have two 2nd rounders (Saints for Shockey), Dolphins (Redskins for Taylor), and Patriots (from SD).

If the Browns (a big IF) can deal either DA and/or Winslow, they could pick up other high draft picks as well,

by talonk on Dec 29, 2008 12:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A team will do it if they have 2 later picks in the 1st (or bet that they will be picking later in the 1st the next year while trading the next year’s 1st) because of the draft value chart. It places an obscene amount of value on the top pick, and then the values slide down exponentially after that.

It’s dumb, but it happens.

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I with you on your call.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Jan 1, 2009 5:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

An additional point to remember is that since Cincy passed us we will have the benefit of facing other 4th place teams with next year’s schedule

by Roger Dorn on Dec 28, 2008 10:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Ah, great point. We’ll now face the Jaguars and the Bills. Had we finished third, we would’ve faced the Texans and the Jets. Granted, not a huge difference, but I think it’s still an advantage. And, to top it off, we get to face the worst division in the AFC, the AFC West, next season.

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by Chris Pokorny on Dec 28, 2008 11:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And the NFC North. In the NFL, destiny really is schedule. Without sounding too much like a brain-damaged Browns fan, if Lerner can make good decisions here and the new coaching staff can make some incremental changes, we could be competitive next year.

Two big “ifs”, I understand, but I think a much easier schedule will help that much. When it comes down to it, all I want is to be consistently playing meaningful games in December and occassionally January. That’s all.

by NickFantana on Dec 28, 2008 11:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wasn't our "match game" this year with the AFC East?

Steelers played Patriots, Browns played Bills, etc. Our match game can’t be with AFC East again, can it? Do we know what two divisions we play whole-scale and what two divisions we play match games?

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Dec 28, 2008 11:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If I remember correctly (and I may not), the “match games” are against teams from the two intra-conference divisions you are not already facing. So, since we are facing the AFC West (and North, obviously) next year, our “match games” are the AFC East and AFC South (Jaguars and Bills for us).

This season, it was the AFC West and AFC East (Broncos and Bills for us, Chargers and Patriots for ya’ll).

I could be way off on this though.

by DisplacedBuckeye on Dec 29, 2008 12:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

what Displaced said ….

But an easier way of looking at it is we play each division rotating, with the “match games” against the same place (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th) of the other two divisions we don’t do a full schedule against.

So next year the AFC North plays the NFC North and the AFC West for full slates, while the Steelers will play Miami and Tennessee while we will play Buffalo and Jacksonville.

For future reference, the AFC North plays the following divisions for full slates like this:

NFC North: 2009, 2013, 2017, etc
NFC South: 2010, 2014, 2018, etc
NFC West: 2011, 2015, 2019, etc
NFC East: 2012, 2016, 2020, etc

AFC West: 2009, 2012, 2015, 2018, etc
AFC East: 2010, 2013, 2016, 2019, etc
AFC South: 2011, 20114, 2020, etc.

by talonk on Dec 29, 2008 12:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s why you we usually kept seeing San Diego vs. Indy and New England vs. Indy every year the past several years, despite the fact they were in different divisions — first place teams play the first place teams from every other division. Next year, the Patriots will also have the benefit of facing the AFC West and the NFC North, and your “match games” will be against Tennessee and Miami.

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by Chris Pokorny on Dec 29, 2008 8:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks, this is helpful

But if the AFC North plays the AFC West and NFC North next year, how can the Patriots also face the AFC West and NFC North?

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Dec 29, 2008 11:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m sorry, substitute “Steelers” for “Patriots” in my paragraph there, lol.

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by Chris Pokorny on Dec 29, 2008 11:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Next year, the Patriots STEELERS will also have the benefit of facing the AFC West and the NFC North, and your "match games" will be against Tennessee and Miami.

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by Chris Pokorny on Dec 29, 2008 11:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

Good luck with personnel search. Cleveland fans deserve better, though I hope not too much better!

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Dec 29, 2008 11:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s not all bad, the Broncos got destroyed.

by fwembt on Dec 28, 2008 11:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

And the Cowboys basically rolled over and died.

Teams I’m cheering for this post-season: Dolphins and Falcons, simply because their turn-arounds inspire a little degree of confidence in me for next season.

by DisplacedBuckeye on Dec 29, 2008 12:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Colts & Panthers!

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by Chris Pokorny on Dec 29, 2008 8:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I always root for the Colts, they’re an easy team to like with Manning and Dungy. And I suppose I’ll root for the Panthers in the NFC, although I don’t care that much (anyone but the Giants). So I guess I’m with you, Chris.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 29, 2008 8:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bugger off for eliminating me in the fantasy league!

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by Chris Pokorny on Dec 29, 2008 9:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t be a sore loser, Chris. Maybe you can fire your coach and throw a lot of money at Bill Cowher.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 29, 2008 10:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You were going to lose to me anyway.

;)

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Panthers have the most Buckeyes of any NFL team on the roster. I believe Atlanta is second so I will be rooting for both of these teams.

by gahnki on Dec 29, 2008 5:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t know that, thanks for the info. Good reason to root for those teams. I always rooted for the Vikings in the late ’90s because the had Cris Carter, Korey Stringer, and Robert Smith starting.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 29, 2008 7:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Duron Carter—going to be as good as the pops?

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hope so, the Buckeyes need some explosive WR’s.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 29, 2008 11:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am hoping for Lamaar Thomas to get some PT. He looks fast and has that first step that a lot of our guys seem to lack. Taurian Washington looked great all offseason but I don’t know what happened.

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think DeVier Posey will be better than either of those guys.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 30, 2008 8:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Forgot about him.

by rufio on Dec 30, 2008 11:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Duron is not explosive. James Jackson is the one to watch.

by gahnki on Dec 30, 2008 12:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Chris Fields sounds fast, too, as does Corey Brown. I can’t ever tell if those guys will end up on O or D, though. Tag me as excited for Jaamal Berry, too.

by rufio on Dec 30, 2008 11:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Corey profiles greatly as a defensive back. Personally, I like him at cornerback. He blew up at the Scout.com combine in Akron last spring, and has impressed at every camp/game he’s been in. The Hawaii-Mainland game was two weeks ago, and CB had three interceptions and just dominated.

by gahnki on Dec 31, 2008 12:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think I’m rooting for Tennessee and Carolina.

by Ryan Kelsey on Dec 29, 2008 2:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Brad, you should do some quant-analysis about the marginally utility of each position and where picks should be made. That said, I’m glad the Browns probably won’t even have the chance to get Crabtree. Bigger fish to fry.

by joeee on Dec 29, 2008 1:50 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

But Crabtree is just soooo enticing. Imagine him and Braylon lining up at WR — wouldn’t that scare the hell out of defenses? I know people don’t like drafting WR’s high, but if you can get the next Moss then isn’t it worth it?

By the way, this morning ESPN had Todd McShay’s early mock Top 10 picks. He had the Browns taking DE/OLB Aaron Maybin from Penn St. Also, Bradford went first, Stafford third, LB Aaron Curry fourth, and Crabtree seventh to the Raiders.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 29, 2008 8:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As said above by very smart individuals…I don’t see Crabtree going past fourth to Seattle. Aaron Curry, though, appears to be the real deal in the sense that he could make an impact in his Rookie year for a number of teams.

I was under the impression that Maybin was going to stay at PSU another year, but…I suppose the fact he could be a top-5 pick would tend to change a lot of minds.

by DisplacedBuckeye on Dec 29, 2008 9:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I like Aaron Curry a lot.

Todd McShay slotting us for Aaron Maybin basically guarantees we will not draft him.

by gahnki on Dec 29, 2008 5:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

From everything you hear, it’s gotten a lot tougher to trade down and still get value. If the Browns get a great offer from someone desparate for say… Crabtree, then I’d love to see us trade down in the 1st round and pick up a few extra picks. Barring that scenario I think we need to take the best players available with every pick regardless of position. We had crippling injuries at nearly every position this year and know nothing about our top two picks (Rucker and Bell).

Take the best players available with a focus on defense but no reaching or drafting for need. I’d love for us to go all defense but I wouldn’t be too upset to see Crabtree come here.

by mgtbfb on Dec 29, 2008 10:37 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

the other option for trading is to move winslow or even edwards. if you get a 1st rounder (i hear from friends around football that edwards could return a 1 and 3) out of one of those guys, maybe it’s worth selecting crabtree at 5 and scooping up a guy like orakpo a bit later.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 29, 2008 11:44 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I’d at least entertain that but I just hate giving up on Edwards even with his drops and penchant to be a crybaby. He’s the type of player, when he’s on his game he’s argueably the best at his position.

Just something to cosider if we do trade Edwards…. Wide Receiver is perhaps our weakest position on the team. Even if we keep Edwards and draft Crabtree that leaves us with only 2 legit NFL receivers. I’m not counting on JJ coming back and Steptoe and company are 5/6th type guys at best. Cribbs is suited for more of a “slash” type role than as a true WR.

If we received a similar offer for Winslow that the Giants got for Shockey (2nd round pick) I’d take it in a heartbeat. He’s on borrowed time IMO. Love his play but I don’t see him giving us more than one or two more good years.

by mgtbfb on Dec 29, 2008 12:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I give you the Titans. They have 0 legit NFL receivers

by Roger Dorn on Dec 29, 2008 12:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Very true, but they run a completely different scheme offensively than we do.

In the end, I’ll be suprised of someone offers us an acceptable deal for Edwards. I’d be willing to bet he plays here in 2009.

by mgtbfb on Dec 29, 2008 12:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I really don’t want to trade Edwards, you’d be selling low on him. If he figures out how to stop dropping passes he’ll be an elite reciever again. I think his problems were all mental and hoepfully he can come back next year with a new attitude. Plus, as you said, if we trade him we don’t really have any good recievers. We need to add receivers, not lose them.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 29, 2008 12:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

if you can get a 1 and 3 for him, i don’t think you’d be selling low on edwards, but that’s clearly a big if. you’re right, though, in that the guy’s got skills.

the point about adding WRs is well taken…if you move braylon and crabtree doesn’t work out, then you’re leaning on jamal to carry the offense. there’s no chris johnson/lendale white here.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 29, 2008 12:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It makes me really mad how LenDale White clearly doesn’t work as hard as he should, clearly does not keep his weight under control, and yet still is a good NFL RB.

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We have no GM and no coach. We have no offensive scheme.

by Ryan Kelsey on Dec 29, 2008 2:37 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

+1. The choice for coach should really impact our draft board.

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

They also have 2 quality RBs, one of which set the record for the 40 at the combine.

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Stallworth is still an NFL caliber WR. Are you assuming they waive him? I’m pretty sure his contract allows that, but the guy was productive for four years in a row before his terrible ‘08. Also there is a pretty decent chance JJ comes back. I’m not saying WR is a position of strength or depth, but it certainly is not high on the priority list, with or without Edwards. It goes behind RB and LB for sure.

by Ryan Kelsey on Dec 29, 2008 2:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Stallworth gets a big bonus if we keep him, my feeling is there is no reason to pay it for how little production we received.

I expect most of the following list to be gone: Stallworth, Jamal Lewis, DA, Shaffer, McGinest, A Davis, Shaun Smith

Sean Jones is also a free agent and may want a big contract, but I am hoping we can sign him to a reasonable deal

by Roger Dorn on Dec 29, 2008 2:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Stallworths VORP and salary cap numbers could spell his demise (could get a slightly less talented player for much cheaper). No team has been able to count on him to be healthy, but with zero NFL caliber guys behind him, you never know. We need youth there no matter what.

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Giving Edwards away now is selling low. No deal.

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yup. I don’t know why people are so eager to trade Edwards and Winlsow. It’s not like we’re overflowing with talent on offense — we’re gonna need those guys next year, especially with a young guy like Quinn starting.

The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 29, 2008 11:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Chris, I think we are also minus a 7th round pick (traded for Travis Daniels). Granted it’s 7th round, but from where the Browns sit that’s nearly a 6th rounder.

Anyways, what are the odds that the next coach will want to stick with the 3-4? That would certainly have an impact on the draft choices.

I think the Browns should definitely look at what they can get in trade for Winslow and Anderson. That could provide enough extra picks to make a realistic attempt at rebuilding. Also, how much dead weight beyond Stallworth can be cut to free up some cap space for free agent signings?

by JustBob on Dec 29, 2008 8:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Guys who have played well in bowl games that I would love to see us draft:

Alex Mack, C, Cal—He was billed as the top C available and I did not come away disappointed after watching him completely dominate Miami’s DTs. Good lord. Also reportedly starred on a Nickelodeon show in the early 90s.

Jahvid Best, RB, Cal—I don’t think he will go high because he is injured a lot. Was playing with a dislocated elbow that had not fully healed, reportedly had hip problems in the previous offseason that recurred all year, and hurt his thumb but was still faster than everyone on Miami’s D. While the U is undersized and young right now, Best just did them dirty. He might not come out for the draft this year, as he could use his senior year to have a healthy campaign and compete for the heisman.

Javaaris James, RB, Miami FL—Don’t know much about him. He weighs 215 and looked quite fast. Those traits combined with the fact that we could get him later if he comes out and that’s enough to cut Jason Wright in my book.

Syd’Quan Thompson, CB, Cal—Small (5’9", ~190), but really really fast and not afraid to hit. Displayed surprising competitiveness on a jump ball against a much taller WR. Only a junior.

Gartrell Johnson, RB, Colorado St—OK, it was pretty hard to miss his bowl performance. But, I saw him earlier in the year against Colorado and he was equally impressive. I was looking to see how CU’s highly touted freshman RB would do, but came away impressed by Johnson. His line and team were clearly inferior, but he kept them in the game for a while and could not be stopped one on one. He is a big back who can be the guy who breaks tackles, gets tough yards, and wears on a defense. He is big (6’0", 225) and his big question is his breakaway speed.

Hakeem Nicks, WR, North Carolina—Another obvious one, but the kid can play WR.

by rufio on Dec 29, 2008 11:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

1. Jahvid Best is not eligible. He will be a junior next year.

2. Javaaris James is not very good. If he comes out, it is because he knows he will not play much next season. The Canes will have two, maybe three players ahead of him on the depth chart.

by gahnki on Dec 30, 2008 12:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If we all agree Harrison can be the 3rd down, speedster guy (not saying that’s definitive though), wouldn’t it make more sense in grabbing a Javon Ringer bruiser type in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th rounds?

by talonk on Dec 30, 2008 12:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Javon Ringer is tiny. He pounds, but he is still small.

by rufio on Dec 30, 2008 11:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ok, I thought Ringer was bigger, but my point still stands, a bruiser like LenDale White in the middle rounds.

by talonk on Dec 31, 2008 12:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought Best had a RS year?

James could be a productive guy in the right situation. We could get him really late, plug him in to the zone scheme and he would be a legit NFL RB, which is an upgrade over Jason Wright. The U doesn’t exactly hurt for talent at RB. They had Frank Gore backing up Clinton Portis backing up Willis McGahee at one point. They aren’t nearly that stacked now, but they aren’t terrible.

by rufio on Dec 30, 2008 11:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Best is from the high school class of 2007.

And the U is hurting for talent greatly. Cooper/James are average. They have three good backs coming in this class, and I would guess that James would be behind two of them (B.Brown and L. Miller) immediately.

All of Miami’s players are young which could lead to a good future if handled correctly. I know a talent scout from South Florida who works for a service. They provide info to colleges on high school players. Some of the stories he’s shared are pretty crazy. Larry Coker really messed that program up.

by gahnki on Dec 31, 2008 12:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was hoping to see that some linebackers had caught your eye. (Why does it seem that we always have so many more needs than picks?)

by JustBob on Dec 30, 2008 9:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A linebacker to watch for in a few years is Sean Spence from Miami. Kid is ideal for a 3-4 scheme. Has a nose for the football like crazy. Never fooled. Ohio State actually has a recruit that reminds me of a bigger Spence

by gahnki on Dec 30, 2008 9:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OSU LB=Sabino?

Spence is only a frosh, though, and he is still really small. I’ll wait to see if he can get up to at least 220-230 before I believe he can be that good in the NFL.

Their CB #1 is also really really good and a freshman.

by rufio on Dec 30, 2008 11:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OSU LB=Sabino?

Dorian Bell.

B. Harris is the corner you are referring to, correct? He’s a baller. Would have gone to OSU, but his dad was close with Randy Shannon. It’s a shame..kid’s good.

by gahnki on Dec 31, 2008 12:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes it is Harris. I remember being disappointed we didn’t get him.

Dorian Bell looked pretty good. I want to see Sabino who didn’t see the field much this year due to Freeman/Lauranaitis.

by rufio on Jan 8, 2009 12:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am taping the Rose Bowl. Between USC’s LBs and Aaron Maybin out of Penn St, there should be someone who stands out.

Everette Brown out of Florida St. didn’t wow me, but I really wasn’t watching that game very closely. I also missed Hughes out of TCU who projects as an OLB. Selvie out of USF, Orakpo out of Texas are two more projected high at the 3-4 OLB. Jasper Brinkley out of South Carolina looked good earlier in the season but some question his speed. If he played in a bowl game, I missed it. Aaron Curry out of Wake Forest reportedly looked like a beast, but I missed that too.

We should try to trade down and get some more picks unless we are positive we will be getting someone unreal at #5. We could also trade down in the later rounds as well, and DA could get shipped for picks this year. I honestly don’t think we have that many huge needs. With another solid draft, one or two FAs, and some of our current players returning to form we should be a lot better.

by rufio on Dec 30, 2008 11:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Key in on Mauluga. He is such a punk. Count the number of times he takes a swing at an opponent after a play. I’m amazed he hasn’t been ejected yet.

by gahnki on Dec 31, 2008 12:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

watch clay matthews. you’ll be impressed with his fundamentals and all-around skills at LB.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 31, 2008 7:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He plays above his talent level. He does everything right where guys like Mauluga can mess up, but their natural ability allows them to recover. It’s a shame he didn’t have more of his father’s talent. He could have been great.

by gahnki on Dec 31, 2008 7:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was not very impressed with Maybin while watching the game live. Every USC LB looked good, even the one who never gets talked about (#43) looked like he warranted a later pick.

by rufio on Jan 8, 2009 12:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Max Unger out of Oregon is not living up to his hype as much as Alex Mack did. He is pretty nimble for a C, and would be great on one of those undersized-but-fast Colts/Broncos types of lines.

by rufio on Dec 30, 2008 11:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

Start posting about the Browns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Brown-ratterman_small
Brown: The Real Color of the Super Bowl

Recent FanPosts

Awesome_small
7 ROUND Browns Mock Draft
42867-mcgahee_1_small
Bill Parcells' Guide to Rebuilding the Browns
Otto_small
Ravens Owner disses Cleveland
019_small
New Salary Structure
Hahahame_small
Keep an Eye on the Vernon Gholston Situation.
Hahahame_small
A gameplan for the Browns' draft.
Otto_small
A case for trading Josh Cribbs
Logo_ksu1_small
2010 Pro Bowl
Small
The Dreaded Bottlegate

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mile High Report
Horse Tracks - 2/9/10 - The Saints Go Marching Home
Hogs Haven
Hogs Haven Chats with OCNN's Chris Cooley
Buffalo Rumblings
Web Rumblings: Buffalo Bills Links, 2/9

Browns Links


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Moderators

Pryor_small Buckeye Brad