Shocker: Browns Release LeCharles Bentley
Last night, I figured I would post a story sometime today to highlight the triumphant return of LeCharles Bentley. When I woke up, the weather was really nice, so I decided to postpone the story until I did some laundry and cut the grass. Then, I came inside and saw that the Rotoworld feed here on Dawgs By Nature stated that Bentley had been released from the team.
WHAT?
If I hadn't reserved the monkey-scratching-his-head-that-says-huh-on-it image for rubbish posts of the week, it would've been suitable here. I was in complete shock as I then read Mary Kay Cabot's story on Cleveland.com, confirming the release.
"LeCharles came back to Cleveland to be in integral part of the Cleveland Browns, his hometown team,'' said Jonathan Feinsod, Bentley's agent. "Through no fault of the Browns at all, they didn't know if LeCharles was going to come back or not and they moved on with their plans.
"But this is not the same team LeCharles signed with. They have commitments to other players. LeCharles is not ready to be an insurance policy at this point.''
There are two main reactions you could have to this situation:
-Call him LeDouchebag
-Shake your head and move on
When I first read the story, I was literally fuming. We've been paying Bentley for two years, and we've always been extremely excited about his potential to return to the field. When he was finally cleared to make a "true" return, he almost arrogantly stated that he is a starter, and if the Browns can't guarantee him of that this very second, some other team will (you have to wonder if another team tampered and was already in contact with him).
On the same note, you can definitely tell that the parallel between Bentley's situation and Gary Baxter's situation has been very different over the past two years. In press conferences, Phil Savage and company seemed to be upbeat and open whenever they mentioned Baxter's amazing and spirit-lifting comeback. Whenever questions were asked about Bentley, the answer seemed to be bland, or something along the lines of "we'll deal with that when he's ready".
The animosity has been there for awhile, and if you look back at all of Savage's comments in the past about Bentley, I'm sure you could easily form a post-bias and deem it as something we should've been more prepared for.
I'm very disappointed that Bentley will not be a part of the Cleveland Browns in 2008, or for any other year in the future. Although he wasn't guaranteed a starting role here, I expected him to beat out Rex Hadnot or Ryan Tucker for the starting right guard role.
Do you know what Bentley probably saw? He probably saw more than 20 teams in the NFL that are desperate for a former Pro Bowl lineman, even if he is coming off of a serious injury. If you're in his shoes, I guess you can't blame him in terms of being assured of a job. I don't agree with the way he went about things, but it is what it is. The biggest positive in this situation is that it does absolutely nothing to degrade our offensive line.
The biggest negative? Well, it could be the possibility that he'll sign with a team like the Pittsburgh Steelers or the Baltimore Ravens any day now. Let the rumors begin...
0 recs |
29 comments
Comments
We’ve been paying Bentley for two years, and we’ve always been extremely excited about his potential to return to the field.
That’s two different we’s there. While the Browns have been paying Bentley for two years, it’s the FANS who’ve been excited about his potential to return to the field. The Browns have pretty much said everything except “we don’t want this guy mucking up what we’ve made.” I think the Browns would have cut him two years ago if he wasn’t a local guy. This is how the Browns get rid of him without taking the PR hit.
Also, I think it’s fair to say that had the Browns offered Bentley a chance to play his way into the starting lineup, he wouldn’t have asked for his release. The Browns were always VERY guarded about where LeCharles would play if he ever came back. Add to that the animosity about not being cleared to play last year even though he thought he was ready and it’s hard to say you couldn’t at least see this coming.
by painaxl on
Jun 11, 2008 5:18 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Good point about the different “we’s”. Although it’s understood, I didn’t realize how self-absorbed the first “we” sounded. “The front office” paid him, and “we” were excited (well, most of us were).
Yeah, the shock and awe of the situation has already dwindled down in my mind. When I first saw it, I thought “WTF”? Several hours later though, I’m really not too surprised. I guess in an optimistic light, you can say this helps the Browns organization because the now-apparent “burden” that Bentley caused is removed before training camp started.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Jun 11, 2008 5:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry – I could search for myself, but how much is left on his contract?
by joeee on
Jun 11, 2008 5:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
His contract was restructured to make 650,000 guaranteed with 4 million dollars in incentives.
by gahnki on
Jun 11, 2008 5:43 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And I should add that this series of events does no surprise me. I know some things about LeCharles from his days at Ohio State that would make people question whether you really want him on your team or not.
by gahnki on
Jun 11, 2008 5:45 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Care to share some tidbits? I’m not trying to turn this into a slanderfest or anything, I’m just curious…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Jun 11, 2008 7:11 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In the end, this doesn’t really hurt the Browns that much, as they had one of the better lines in the league without him last season. I am really surprised that it ended like this though.
Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!
by MrNFL on
Jun 11, 2008 7:15 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Even though there’s no way Bentley will get the Thome, Manny, or Boozer treatment, if he comes to Cleveland Browns Stadium this year on a visitor’s team, there will most certainly be some added intensity to the game.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Jun 11, 2008 7:47 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was simply disappointed on reading this. I’m not that upset, I’m not that surprised. Just… disappointed. I’m not a Buckeye fan, so seeing him playing for the Browns wouldn’t have been that big of deal to me, outside it potentially improving the team (However, if Ken Dorsey ever throws a TD as a Brown to K2… watch out). Still, I hoped he’d give it a chance as a Brown.
by Fundamentals on
Jun 11, 2008 8:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
LaCharles
I heard a rumor, not in person but on one of the major Browns sites, maybe here, that LaCharles fell down on his first play as a Cleveland Brown, saying it was a new injury. This un-remembered source said that LaCharles had an old injury. So he was faking.
Anybody ever hear about this? Could there be some truth.
Wow, that injury on the very first play as a Brownie, no defense, it just happened…........?
by vincefitz on
Jun 11, 2008 9:45 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I’ve heard that rumor before as well. I believe it was something about him playing basketball the day before training camp and injuring his knee. Then he supposedly fell down on the first play.
On this story, I have no idea whether it is true or not.
by gahnki on
Jun 11, 2008 9:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’ve heard the rumor too. In fact, I considered bringing it up when writing this piece as something to ponder. However, either way, he’s been through a lot and I HOPE I can give him the benefit of the doubt.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Jun 11, 2008 11:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Best Site
Chris, I have to commend you. I hope you make some $ doing this because I don’t want you to stop.
This is the best Browns site on the internet!!!!!!!!
by vincefitz on
Jun 11, 2008 9:48 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks!
Thanks for the props :D Compliments never get old…I soak ‘em in…
There’s no need for me to ever stop…unless the Browns aren’t in the NFL anymore, the passion towards the Browns itself, money or no money, will keep me going.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Jun 11, 2008 10:37 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LaCharles
I am wondering why the Browns did not refuse to grant LaCharles free agancy and hold him hostage until he became part of a trade for a CB.
Many people are saying he has value on the market. Just heard this on Sportscenter, that alot of teams are alredy asking about signing Bentley to a contract.
by vincefitz on
Jun 11, 2008 10:59 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
OK, so if he actually can play at a high level…why wouldn’t he stay around and earn a starting job? Pre-injury, he would have had no problem beating out Fraley. Furthermore, if he could still play, why would the Browns just let him go (and not try to trade him for, say, someone’s DB)? Something is fishy here. If he truly is “stronger and more explosive” than he has ever been, I have got to question this move. We (front office we) could have looked for a trade, or just kept him under contract. Disappointed indeed.
by rufio on
Jun 11, 2008 11:03 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I doubt he has any trade value (because he has not proven he can play). But some crazy team will pay him more than the Browns were.
by palcal on
Jun 12, 2008 12:20 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don’t think it’s terribly crazy to sign him to a decent deal. His contract was heavily incentive based with the Browns so a better deal exists. He certainly won’t get a big contract like the one he originally signed with us, but I believe he can get one with some more guaranteed money.
We (front office we) could have looked for a trade, or just kept him under contract. Disappointed indeed.
As a Browns fan I am not really upset that this happened. If the Browns really valued him we wouldn’t have just released him. It shows you that we shouldn’t worry too much about this.
Just knowing what kind of person LeCharles is makes me a little sad that this has taken place this way. I don’t blame him for maximizing his value, but the Browns have done more for him during this time than many other organizations would have. It would have been nice to see some type of effort made to work things out with the Browns.
by gahnki on
Jun 12, 2008 12:30 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know someone will at least check him out and probably sign him, but if they are going to give him what he wants don’t you think they might give up a late round pick or their 4th string CB to get him?
by rufio on
Jun 12, 2008 10:33 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I vote LeDouchebag
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Jun 12, 2008 2:57 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I was hesitant to include that as an option; I thought people might think it was too harsh, forcing them to vote for the other option regardless. Fortunately, I got what I was aiming for…a near 50/50 split in the voting thus far.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Jun 12, 2008 8:27 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Scenario
Regarding the full release of LaCharles without trying to trade him. One scenario is:
The Browns saw him run, and although it is reported he ran well, maybe they saw something that said, he will not make it back.
The Browns did not demade his value in trade because they knew he was still injured.
by vincefitz on
Jun 12, 2008 10:37 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Possibly, but I don’t think the Browns have any reason to fiddle with the truth. I guess we’ll find out soon when a team locks him up to a contract just how healthy he is.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Jun 12, 2008 10:50 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Truth
This scenario would be the truth.
All that was said about his running was that he beat 7 seconds. Wow, you and I could do 7, and I’m 62 years old.
by vincefitz on
Jun 12, 2008 11:01 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Forget running…we could walk it in 7 seconds.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Jun 12, 2008 12:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Diapers
Forget walking:
We could crawl it in diapers…......
But than Mommy would have to come pick us up!!!!!
by vincefitz on
Jun 12, 2008 1:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hmmm…perhaps even better yet, we could bind our legs and feet together.
I suppose the next step after that is going to sleep and just letting the wind blow you. =O
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Jun 12, 2008 2:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs














