Browns in for a fall?
I am very worried that the Browns will fall back to 6-10 year. Savage despite all the good press has been a below avergae drafter. He has only 1 draft pick from the 05 left, Edwards, Pool is still on roster but hs been a bust.
He has tried to build the team with FA's and trades, which has been proven not to work. In 4 years of drafting he has drafted only 1 offensive lineman that contributes and ZER defensive lineman.
With a tougher schedule, I think Browns will finish 6-10
This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.
42 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
How has he been..
A below average drafter?
Edwards
Pool
Wimbley
Jackson
Williams
Vickers
Thomas
Quinn
Wright
McDonald
Think your posts through a little more next time.
What you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
You really have got to just be fishing for internet arguments, but I'll go ahead and bite.
I don’t even know where to begin when debating this post.
The Browns could go 6-10 this year, maybe, but it won’t be the lack of capable players that causes that dissappointment.
Savage is doing a tremendous job. There is not one position on the roster that doesn’t look better now than it did when he inherited the team. I think he is one of the top 3 GMs in the league, which is debatable, but there is no way he is doing a “below average” job.
Are you kidding me?
We now have arguably the best offensive line in football, with arguably the 2nd best offensive lineman in football at THE marquee position on the line. Our offense was ranked 8th in the NFL last year. That’s higher than anything ever in expansion Browns’ history. Savage traded a 1st round pick (which many people thought would be a top 5 pick) to get Quinn, and stacked our roster at the most desired position in the NFL. After lucking out, and having that potential top 5 pick become the exact same # pick in this year’s draft, he still made moves to acquire 2 guys with pro bowl potential to help our D.
Besides not missing on 1st or 2nd round picks (which should be almost automatic for a good GM) like some of our past GM’s (William Green, Courtney Brown, Gerrard Warren, anyone?), Savage has been able to find pro bowl caliber guys in the later rounds and after draft day. Cribbs, Vickers, Harrison, McDonald, Leon Williams are all guys who can play in the NFL that Savage found AFTER the 1st day of the draft. Cribbs already has one, and Vickers may be nearing that type of status. Late round picks don’t have a super-high success rate, and Savage is doing a great job finding players there.
Furthermore, even when the picks SHOULD be locks to become great NFL players, Savage has done well where others have failed. Take the 2005 draft. These were the players Savage DIDN’T draft with the 3rd overall pick:
Alex Smith-jury still out, probably a bust, never going to make the pro bowl
Ronnie Brown-injured most of his career, probably out of football soon
Cedric Benson-can’t stop drinking and operating vehicles, sucked when he actually played.
Cadillac Williams-good for a little bit, injured a lot. Just about anyone can run in that scheme.
Pacman Jones-enough said.
Antrel Rolle-decent NFL player
Carlos Rogers-decent NFL player, probably will never make the pro bowl
Mike Williams-humongous bust. should not be on any NFL roster, terrible player.
That is the rest of the 2005 top 10. I’d say Savage did better than any of those people.
Predict what you want about the upcoming season, but Savage is the best front office man the entire city of Cleveland has had in quite some time.
Davis’ legacy is currently better than Savage’s because Davis had a playoff season.
We kid, we kid ;0
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Jul 13, 2008 1:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Pro Football Prospectus 2008 has the Browns pegged for 6.5 wins. While a small sample size, PFP’s been more accurate than the Vegas win totals in the past two years.
On the other hand, PFP 2007 had the Cowboys at 6-10 as well. I’ll take a similar result for the 2008 Browns, thank you very little.
You know Selig? Ombudsman.
PFP fluctuates wildly…I’m a big fan of Football Outsiders, but there is just way too many mistakes in predictions for me to wholeheartedly agree with their statistical measures. I read their website everyday and what they are attempting to do is admirable. However, I would put as much stock in them as any other well thought out source.
And they’re admittedly still evolving as they tinker with their numbers each year. Their numbers seem to always have an unexplained bias towards Tampa Bay.
As for “any other well thought out sourse”, as an Indians fan, you should know that these are not easy to come by in the mainstream media (which, FO probably receives the same mainstream attention as Ken Pomeroy, while slightly less than BP). PFP isn’t perfect, but I usually go there first before scouring other websites.
You know Selig? Ombudsman.
I just saw these replies now....delayed response.
FO actually has hit mainstream on a pretty big level. ESPN has their writers put up articles and share content all of the time.
Around the draft there was a nice look at stats that correlate to NFL success above others. It was interesting.
The problem that I have with advanced statistics for football is that you don’t have the same isolation that you do in baseball that allows the variables to be separated and measured to be used as a good source of predicting the future.
In baseball, you have isolated instances – pitcher vs batter – that you don’t get in football. How much of a wide receiver’s production is based on the quality of the offensive line? I would argue quite a bit, but how do you measure that with statistics? Even if you can to an extent, there are too many other dependent variables that can contribute to that success. Numbers can be helpful in football, but I don’t think will ever have near the same impact as they do on baseball.
I just saw these replies now....delayed response.
That’s exactly true. There will never be a universal stat that works as well as OPS or WHIP for instance.
How you have to look at is “player a is better in y’s system than player b is in x’s system.”
The system would represent the team’s surrounding talent and the schemes they run.
It’s all about the lines, I have been saying it for years. Before last season, I predicted that either Anderson or Frye could surprise us and turn out to be very serviceable due to the major upgrade we went through on the O line. I expect similar magic on the defensive side of the ball this year. I’d be shocked if we won 6 games or fewer
http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2007/7/10/211420/916#5317244
Link to my thoughts on the matter about a year ago and the ensuing chain
I don’t even have to read what you wrote and I completely agree.
Lines aren’t sexy, but you need good ones to win.
I hate to say this but the Steelers found ways to win through their Lines. Again I hated saying that very much.
Hmmm…look what his user profile biography section says:
http://www.sbnation.com/users/dawgfan67
No dawg fan would say that.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
Man I can’t wait until we have another successful season (this one), so all this BS about the Browns being “built through free agency and trades” can stop. We have drafted half of our starters in the last 4 years alone (and that doesn’t include Quinn).
Plus
with the labor talks coming up, FA might not be a terrible way to build. We aren’t an old team, and we aren’t in salary cap hell, two criticisms of building through FA and trades. Savage is smart and makes KEY additions. He doesn’t just throw money away.
Savage's draft Record
Savage has drafted only 1 offensive lineman – a great one in Thomas, but only one, not even a back-up, Edwards a great pick, Dqwell Jackson has been average at best., 2 tackles behind line in 2 years. Wimbley had a bad 2nd year, some games he had 1 or 2 tackles, teams ran right a him, Eric Wright and Vickers are good players.
Zero defensive lineman even as a back-ups from the draft. 1st draft has 2 players left Edwards and Pool, Pool is terrible and had to split time with waiver wire pick-up Mike Adams as the year progressed, From 05 draft ONE player Edwards.
You call that good drafting????
dawgfan67
You forgot to mention;
He got DA for nothing.
He got Hank Fraley for almost nothing.
He got the best special team player in football, Joshua Cribbs for free.
He took 3/5 starting LBs in the draft (I am count Leon Williams as a starter).
He has overcome two freak injuries to “core” players in Baxter and Bentley.
He has uncovered gems late in the draft like McDonald, Williams and Vickers
He was responsible for 4 of the 6 pro Bowlers last year. (K2 and Pontibrand being from Butch)
He has brought in a brilliant offensive mind in Chud.
Yeah, he sucks
by Bernie19Kosar on Jul 10, 2008 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions
And by the way, who is a good drafter?
by Bernie19Kosar on Jul 10, 2008 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree, I’d like to see more drafted depth at O-line, and I expect that to be the plan of attack this upcoming draft. Because when a team can draft depth its in a good position. Dqwell Jackson has been average and Wimbley had a down second year, but remember a 3-4 defense with a sucky D-line is going to be awful. Wimbley was our only pass rush threat last season, so teams could double him and shut us down.
And, I’m not sure where you are getting this idea that Pool is terrible. He is one of the highest potential young safeties in the league. Mike Adams wasn’t exactly “splitting time” with him like you imply.
Remember, Savage had 6 years of pretty awful drafts to overcome. There is a reason the only significant players from the Pre-Savage days are a longsnapper, a kicker and a middle linebacker. This team has had to make a complete overhaul in a league that is not safe to GM’s and head coaches who have to make overhaul projects. I expect no big draft day trades this upcoming season, and lots of drafted depth (with RB and OLB being the starters drafted) after that we will see how you feel.
by Estonianzulu on Jul 11, 2008 8:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Now, let’s discuss the Steelers O-line:
Marvel Smith – probably the best lineman out of this lousy bunch, but has a bad back and is getting older
Chris Kemoeatu – replacing Faneca, will be almost impossible to have the same impact as Faneca
Justin Hartwig – Is Sean Mahan that bad? I mean this guy was cut by the Panthers who don’t exactly have a top notch line
Kendall Simmons – Yawn
Max Starks or Willie Colon – Either way, I am not losing sleep. Sweet transition tag on an average at best lineman, though
Run along “Dawgfan”
Dude
Yes. The 05 draft was terrible. Merriman, Edwards, Ware, that’s it. Should we have gone with JJ Arington, Reggie Brown, Stanford Routt, or Odell Thurman instead of Pool? Oh man, we could have had Chris Henry or Maurice Clarett! Criticizing Savage for not picking well in his first ever NFL draft is pointless because our roster is the deepest and most talented it has been since the Browns came back. And its only going to get better.
Savage has not only drafted 1 Olineman, try Isaac Sowells. He also drafted Jon Dunn as an OT.
He drafted Oshinowo, Chase Pittman and Melia Purcell as Dlinemen. He drafted Rubin this year to play DL also. They may not ever develop in to the kinds of players we need, but you can’t say he ignored positions. In the end, it doesn’t matter where the players come from, it matters how they play, how much they are paid, and how much wear and tear they have on them. Also, in a 3-4 you just need 4 really talented guys on the DL. So drafting DL is probably less important vs in a 4-3, and LBs (especially OLBs) is probably more important.
He hasn’t needed to draft linemen because he has found them elsewhere. He got Fraley for next to nothing. He had 2 pro bowlers come to the Browns in Steinbach and Bentley, and then found like 4 centers when Bentley went down. We have the best line in the NFL and they are all young outside of Tucker, so we don’t need to draft a whole lot of Olinemen. We even have 2 guys coming off the bench that I wouldn’t mind starting. Thats more people than I felt comfortable with than on the entire 2004 roster. He had 2 potential pro bowlers fall in to our laps on the DL this year, and picked up Shaun Smith (another young FA) for less than he was worth.
Pool is far from terrible. He is a capable starter and can contribute against the best teams in the NFL. He isn’t Ed Reed or Troy Polamalu, but he isn’t Anthony Smith, either.
Your posts are barely worth responding to, so I probably won’t be thinking up new ways to defend Savage. Don’t think that you’ve “won” or something if/when I don’t respond. I only care about wins that happen offline.
by rufio on Jul 11, 2008 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Good question...Wrong answer
I put our record at no better than 9-7 this year simply due to the schedule and that we are still a growing team. We did win a lot of close games last year that could have easily gone the other way (loss some that way too). I fear that if we do slip to 7-9 (also reasonable) or worse that this type of post and sentiment will permeate Cleveland and people will be calling for Savagae’s and Crennel’s jobs. I hope nobody listens. The ship has great captains and is on the right course….keep sailing through the rough waters ahead!
I am being optimistic
in guessing 9-7. I agree: we only beat a few good teams last year. This year it will be much harder. BUT, we were absurdly close to beating Pittsburgh, who always is one of the best teams in the AFC. The trick is beating them once, and then having the maturity and the confidence to know that once they get over that hump, they can play with anyone. This team has to learn how to always win the close games. It will happen, but i don’t know if it will be this year or the year after, but the talent is there and the confidence will come.
DAL-L
PITT-W
BAL-W
CIN-W
NYG-L
WAS-W
JAC-L
BAL-W
DEN-W
BUF-W
HOU-L
IND-L
TEN-W
PHI-W
CIN-L
PIT-L
Savage is
the best thing to hit Cleveland since LeBron. If the Browns finish 6-10 it will not be because of him as others have pointed out.
We’d all have to be hypocrites to criticize Savage. The Cavs have done well despite fans hatred of Ferry as GM, and Indians fans are livid at Dolan/Shapiro/Wedge.
With the Browns, Savage’s job is safe regardless; I agree. The same can’t be said for Romeo Crennel, considering we called for his head if the Browns failed to succeed last year. Still; a bad season wouldn’t bring up “fire Crennel” discussions until some time in 2009, if necessary.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Jul 13, 2008 2:00 AM EDT up reply actions
I am going to say the obvious; they need to stay healthy (which I read that Jurevicious may not make season opener); we need to pull through in the end of the games (enough of the heart-attacks, cant we just crush teams) OUR DEFENSE needs to step it up a lot!! (we need to pick up a good veteran DB like Ty Law) sign him for a year, on a performance based contract and see where that takes us….We cant afford to go down after such a bright season.
I can live with the heart-attack finishes—heck, even the Cowboys and/or Colts had a lot of close-game finishes last year (not everyone can cruise like the Pats, even with talent).
The biggest key remains the injury bug. Because no matter how great your drafts are, how good your FA pickups are, or how good your veterans are, if there are multiple injuries to starters, you can’t help it and yet will find yourselves struggling to compete.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Jul 13, 2008 2:03 AM EDT up reply actions
I understand that there will be close games, but the Browns do it on a normal basis, and your right I’ll take the W anytime but itd be nice to cruise to some wins just once in a while.
Once in a while
But the Pats won a lot of those type of games last year (just about all 16). When they got in to a low scoring game and it was close, they choked. They were a veteran team that probably knew how to win close games/low scoring games, but they were not in the practice of doing so.
If you are used to winning close games, and suddenly find yourself up 30, you will still figure out how to win (just don’t screw up superbigtime). If you are used to being up 30, and find yourself in a close game, its anyone’s guess what that will do for your and your teammates’ confidence. I would rather see the Browns winning a lot of close games than a lot of blowouts.
Staying healthy is a pretty big issue, but players never try to get hurt. There is no sure fire way to avoid injury, you just gotta hope. On O it might not be as big of an issue as on D. We have backups at a lot of positions on O that are capable of filling in for a few games, and we have enough weapons we can lean on other players if someone goes down.
The entire D will look better because of Rogers and Williams. I promise. We could use a corner, but I doubt Ty Law would work for a few reasons. First, he is probably too slow right now to play CB. We would probably have to move him to S, preferably SS, where we have a potential pro bowler in Sean Jones. Law has always been a big, physical corner who doesn’t have the movement skills of a Champ Bailey. His speed was always “good enough” but never “great”. I doubt he is as fast now as he has been in the past. Maybe it would work if we are playing more Cover 2 this year, but he doesn’t seem to fit the type of corner we have previously gone after (we seem to place the emphasis on speed and quickness over size and physicality).
The real reason I think Law hasn’t signed on with the Browns or any other team in the NFL, though, is the money. I guarantee other teams are looking for a CB too. They have all thought about bringing him in. He has to be holding out for more than he is worth, or a multi-year contract. He must believe his body of work is good enough to warrant bigger money, and I don’t think we can afford it.
I don’t think its panic time. Savage has not tried to fix all of the problems in one year, and made smart moves every year. Law will be there all year as a FA. I would like to at least see what some of the rookie free agents look like against backups in the preseason before we look to a guy like Law.
To be honest, I just can’t get too worried about who our 4th cornerback is or isn’t going to be. I understand the need for depth, but that’s a luxury, not a necessity.
And I’m absolutely giddy about Wright and McDonald starting. I was actually worried Holly was going to be given the starting job in classic Crennel deference-to-the-veterans fashion… Statistically both Wright and McDonald were phenomenal last year, and they were only rookies.
For the future I would like to see McDonald as the 3rd corner. I just don’t know if he can turn and run down the field with some #2 WRs. I love him and definitely want him on the Browns, his quickness, hands, and awareness all seem pretty good, but he is a smaller guy and I am not convinced he can turn and run well. If he can, I will be a happy man this fall/winter.
Wright has pro bowl potential.
The reasons I am worried about a 4th CB are 1. Injuries and 2. The top teams in the AFC right now are using or want to use multiple WR sets. Indy does, and has receiving TEs, NE does, and has multiple receiving TEs, Jax wants to be able to, Pittsuck can, and drafted Sweed in the 2nd round, SD has Gates, Tomlinson, and whatever WRs they can put out there who can all catch the ball, etc.
Its really a minor problem, you are right. Stopping the run and rushing the passer are much more important, and I am glad we at least made strides toward doing those things over the offseason. Ask Cincy how much drafting 1st round CBs helps your defense when you can’t stop the run or rush the passer.
I'm a die hard cowboys fan......
although i think we’ll beat you the first game, i honestly think you’ll take the afc north….but i think winslow needs to put up real #’s for more than one year before he conplains about his contract…..and i’d hate to be a steelers fan this year…......good luck this year you guy’s deserve it…
I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by 
















