Flash Package: Joshua Cribbs the Browns' Key Against Pittsburgh
by ChrisPokorny on Sep 14, 2008 2:23 PM EDT
in 2008 Game Day Threads
602 comments
"Powerful offense, porous defense."
Though there have been improvements this season on the defensive line, at least until the chemistry builds up (if it does), we're going to have to rely on shootouts. Considering our offense can't score on every possession to match what our defense gives up, we need an X-factor. That X-factor is none other than Joshua Cribbs.
When we lost to the Steelers 31-28 last November, how many solid offensive drives did we have?
One. That's right -- just one. It came on our first offensive drive of the game, consisting of 16 plays for 71 yards, and lasting nearly ten minutes. After that, the offense was shut down and the defense really couldn't stop Ben Roethlisberger. We survived on the kick returns of Cribbs.
After our first touchdown, the Steelers kicked a field goal. On the ensuing kickoff, Cribbs returned the ball 90 yards, setting up an easy touchdown pass to Lawrence Vickers. We later scored another touchdown after great field position following a Brodney Pool interception.
In the second half, the Steelers scored two touchdowns to take the lead. That lead didn't last too long though, as Cribbs had his ever-so-memorable 100-yard tiptoe kick return for a touchdown, putting us back on top at the time. Without Cribbs' ability, we very well could've lost 35-14. After missing last week's game against the Dallas Cowboys, fans have an even greater appreciation. Syndric Steptoe and Gerard Lawson were frustrating to watch on returns, because you could visualize Cribbs taking the same kicks an extra 20 yards at least every time. The big question, then, is this: is he ready?
"I'm ready," Cribbs vowed. "I feel I can be a difference in the game."
In order for the Browns to beat the Steelers, we're going to need more contributions from Cribbs than just kick and punt returns. We're going to need him on offense too.
With Donte Stallworth doubtful and unlikely to play for the second week in a row, we're in need of an extra weapon for Anderson. That has to involve Rob Chudzinski's "Flash" package that was on display throughout all of training camp. Although Cribbs has not had a lot of practice time lately, this is arguably the biggest game of the season for the Browns, and you need to bring everything you have to the table. I'm not saying every play needs to be a reverse to Cribbs or an option pass down the field to Braylon Edwards, but something needs to be in place to keep the Steelers' secondary off-guard. Head coach Romeo Crennel has already stated that Cribbs may not play the gunner position on kick return in hopes that he can be used in some of the offensive sets.
In the national spotlight, there's no better player than Cribbs to alleviate the pressure facing the rest of the team. Hopefully it's enough to finally defeat the Steelers, and regain our side of pride in this heated rivalry.
"Powerful offense, porous defense...and a great special teams."
0 recs |
602 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
As always
Great post. Lets get this game going!
by OscarDog on Sep 14, 2008 3:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Donte Stallworth is really looking like the offense’s Antwan Peek. How do you pull a quad/groin enough to have to sit for 2 weeks?
Lets hope Cribbs is healthy. I feel like his injury (ankle sprain) shouldn’t hurt his north/south hit-the-hole-as-hard-as-I-can style as much as it would for a Donte Hall style runner. With all the WRs out with injuries, do you think we will line him up wide more than usual, Chris?
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 4:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think we’d have to. Steptoe and Sanders have literally no experience in regular season games at the receiver position, and in prime time and a rivalry game, we need someone who is not timid to take charge. Granted, Cribbs’ reps at receiver are limited too, but he is a playmaker.
I’d still like to see Sanders start, and work off of Cribbs in rotation or in the slot.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on Sep 14, 2008 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why do I have this nagging feeling?
that Pittsburgh will play like USC and the Browns like Ohip State? Gosh I hope I am wrong but I got a bad feeling if the Browns dont take the game to the Steelers.
by Juannieboy on Sep 14, 2008 7:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Because you are a Browns fan and you are resetting to your default feelings about games.
Nothing unusual.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Lets say yes, for the time being.
by Fundamentals on Sep 14, 2008 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cribbs is back. And the peasants rejoice
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Poor start by the offense. I have this recurring nightmare where the Anderson of the final four games last year is the real Anderson…
by Fundamentals on Sep 14, 2008 8:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the sunday night football extra online is pretty cool with the different cameras
by Gradyforpresident on Sep 14, 2008 8:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that was pretty good coverage by Wright if thats what you are talking about. Great throw by ben though.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
SACK!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Williams, Sorensen and D’Qwell met together at the QB. Nice work, defense.
by Fundamentals on Sep 14, 2008 8:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
DA is looking like he is TOO ready to take the easy, underneath throw again. He needs to look to attack, and then dump down AFTER the deep/main receiver isn’t open. D is looking great.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 8:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I like the aggressiveness there. Looks REALLY windy.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 8:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Let’s have a talk about how much we absolutely must stay out of third and long tonight.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 8:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It would have been fine if he would have just caught the ball.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Glad to see us rush more than 3.
And I think I just heard Madden woof.
by DrewskiC on Sep 14, 2008 8:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The dropsies continue
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
in golf terms
Braylon’s got the yips
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ol' Ben doesnt look too sharp. thankfully
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hit Ben hard! Let him feel that shoulder!
by Juannieboy on Sep 14, 2008 8:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If theres on thing I know, its sore shoulders
trust me, that wind and rain will make him fell that shoulder plenty.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we can keep stopping the run we have a chance because of Ben’s shoulder and the weather.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 8:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Another drive, another third and long.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 8:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
P.S. Jerome Harrison has been in on a few tackles on special teams…
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 8:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
need to get kellen the damn ball. he’ll catch it.
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 8:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
hope Chud has a clue
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s funny how they’ve essentially, and rather discretely, swapped the roles of Harrison and Wright. Just a month ago Wright was the backup and Harrison was the third down back – and now it appears it’s been flipped.
by DrewskiC on Sep 14, 2008 8:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Harrison showed a bit more in preseason, I thought
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree and am completely happy with the move. I just think is interesting that they made the change late and after never really making it seem that the roles were up for competition.
by DrewskiC on Sep 14, 2008 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why no screens?....slow down the rush Get some plus yards
by Juannieboy on Sep 14, 2008 8:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And… my cable just went out. I hate this wind…
by Fundamentals on Sep 14, 2008 8:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Whew.
thought they had that. Good to have you back, Mr. Pool
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Zastudil 3 punts in less than 8 minutes, averaging 52 yards
by palcal on Sep 14, 2008 8:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Aren’t they saying that it’s in to the wind too?
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NEVER RUSH THREE, YOU MIGHT AS WELL RUSH ZERO
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 8:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We could at least do all three from one side of the line or something.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Glad to see Pool is leading with his head after the concussion.
by DrewskiC on Sep 14, 2008 8:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
following the Eric Lindros School of Concussion Recovery
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great! How often does Ward drop anything>
by Juannieboy on Sep 14, 2008 8:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
he dropped at least two in the super bowl
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Could have gone upfield there, Vickers? Or uhm, oh – nevermind.
by DrewskiC on Sep 14, 2008 8:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He should have lowered his head and picked it up. Maybe he saw the flag, otherwise that’s poor effort.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bullshit chants have begun
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
at least the rain gives them an excuse this week.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Terrible play call
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
they are just playing field position right now. The D is playing well, now if we can flip the field on them we can score in the 1st half.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
seriously, i agree. the pats (w/ brady) wouldn’t be afraid to just throw the ball up to moss 30 yards downfield there. do the same damn thing w/ edwards. their corners suck.
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
very disappointing drive
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 8:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Cannibalistic Humanoid Underground Dwellers
cult classic horror flick
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks for your quick response — nice work!
by JulioBernazard on Sep 14, 2008 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did our Dline just get pushed back there or was that a zone blitz I saw?
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Michaels love to hear himself talk ............even when it makes no sense
by Juannieboy on Sep 14, 2008 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it was Madden, which somewhat explains the terrible logic.
by DrewskiC on Sep 14, 2008 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did anyone see that Broncos game?
Stupid call. Just stupid. But it paid off.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yes.
if only we had a secondary to match
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
why, because that run would have gone for 40+ last year? Or because of the stop on 3rd and short against the steelers? Or are you being sarcastic?
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nah, i just mean in general. when 5 yards is a good run for the other team, i’m happy.
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
could be all three
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought our run D was pretty good last week overall as well until late in the game.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m putting the line at .5 for first downs this drive. Over/Under?
by DrewskiC on Sep 14, 2008 9:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You should have put a line on number of plays for that drive.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I mean – we were probably going to punt anyway, so it wasn’t all that bad.
by DrewskiC on Sep 14, 2008 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
braylon is going through the motions. every damn play.
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
stoptherunstoptherunstoptherun it’s all they have tonight. If we can get some of those long balls to go the other way (to us) we can win this game.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
qb-ing is the difference in this game so far…
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice tackle by Wright, terrible job by McGinest. He should know better, his only asset at this point is his mind.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
D is much less infuriating than last week
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 9:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder if they send in backups just to try to fight the other team just to get key players kicked out in this game. I would try to fight Ben or Holmes or Ward in this game.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How was that not also grounding? He wasn’t outside the pocket.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
YES
wow, you said it earlier, rufio, mcginest is supposed to be a heady player, and he should have fucked us there.
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He’s been doing this for so long, and he has so little of his speed and explosiveness left…he’s got to use his brain. Got to. Savage has got to draft another OLB soon.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trickery and deceit will get you everywhere in football (on the field.)
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
See: belichick, bill
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
WOW.
I just went ballistic. Thank you to whomever called that TO.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 9:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Steelers bullshit bit them in the ass their
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
uh there
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah don't call any of that holding, zebras.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Always good to see an acquisition that works out
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, i think i might go for thomas, now that you mention it.
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
catching a football in the wind has got to be like hitting a knuckleball. It always looks like the receiver is aiming 2 feet away from where the ball ends up coming.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was wondering that , too. At least the second.
by JulioBernazard on Sep 14, 2008 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fucking team is gonna give me a heart attack
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought he would win the “dirtiest player” award over Harrison
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so when does ESPN do the "Biggest Dickhead" award? cause he's a shoo-in
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I have never agreed with a comment so much in my entire life.
by Bernie19Kosar on Sep 15, 2008 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did we seriously have a spy there!?!? Why!?!
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
DAMMIT TO HELL
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Did we just put a pick on our own player?
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 9:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
do the Browns have an answer or is it 10 straight?
by palcal on Sep 14, 2008 9:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
take that meaningless commentary back to LGT
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No excessive celebration for Hines?
by JulioBernazard on Sep 14, 2008 9:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
OK So if DA cant move it ..get BQ some reps...
by Juannieboy on Sep 14, 2008 9:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just no. We’re not there yet.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no. cut that out right now. If its is like the Cowboys game last week with 5 mins to go in the 4th, then maybe. But down only 7-0, you stick with your guy. Unless they are going to Charlie Frye Anderson and go with Quinn. Was that confusing?
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i said it back in june, but this line is wildly overrated when it comes to run blocking
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
it looked like Polamalu was coming across to the FS’ side just to match up with him. It’s hard with Polamalu on him.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cribbs for the 1st
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
haha, c’mon man… i’m 4 deep on leiny’s red right now… and pain killers for an operation two weeks ago…
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You see…
Third and short. This is better.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 9:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
nice run by Lewis there
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Steptoe absolutely cannot block at all… wow.
by Fundamentals on Sep 14, 2008 9:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Vickers old=skools it for a 1st
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Now this drive could be promising
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bring in Quinn!!! He would have scored already.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
shit, suit up Jim Brown, he can probably still do short-yardage work
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that’s probably more rational than calling for Quinn because the steelers scored ONCE.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would like to point out that I suggested this last week and I stand by it.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Polamalu looked pretty hilarious though.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
these seinfeld/MS commercials our unbelievably bad… what are you thinking, jerry?
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
he's thinking, "ooo, what a big check!"
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he’s thinking “why the hell did I cancel my show?”
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that’s in the area of offensive holding and adding the fact that DA switched directions and had to break from the original plan…thats holding 90% of the time.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha, no, I agree. I was sure it was holding too.
by DrewskiC on Sep 14, 2008 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree. I just didn’t say it.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ma needs to be smacked with a rolled up newspaper
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
is there a more contemptable human being, in all aspects, than al michaels?
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Damn you, Romeo
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh, for the love of CHRIST
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
have to go to braylon in that situation
by Roger Dorn on Sep 14, 2008 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly, see below. want to apply for the coaching positions with me, RD?
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Considering I am a bundle of nerves sitting at home, I’ll let you take the honors
by Roger Dorn on Sep 14, 2008 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
two hydrocodones and 5 Lienenkugel Reds does wonders for your nerves.
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
they dont sell Liney red here. Just Summer wheat
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
SoCal
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You guys aren't nearly unimaginative or unorganized enough to be Romeo's coaches
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just terrible.
Terrible, terrible, terrible.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 9:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Really? This is the team I waited all summer to watch? Christ.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dear sir, please do shut up.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the only play is to edwards there. the ONLY play
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If this is going to be a trend, I would suggest ending it.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
are we gona stick with DA while the season goes down the shitter?
by Juannieboy on Sep 14, 2008 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
right now, this team has MANY other problems besides him
by JulioBernazard on Sep 14, 2008 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry the QB is the man in charge and he is showing his ass 2 INTs!!!
by Juannieboy on Sep 14, 2008 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think QBing is clearly the difference in this game so far. but this D is really showing me something, to be honest.
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gah!
I hate this team and this coach and Michael Phelps and the wind and especially ESPECIALLY the goddamn Steelers, every one of them.
by exposition on Sep 14, 2008 9:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Seriously, Hines Ward and Troy Polamullet and Ben Backwardscap and all the rest of those fucking yinzers can eat me.
by exposition on Sep 14, 2008 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Well, its clear DA is costing us this one thus far. Our defense has shut this offense down given how mediocre it is.
by Estonianzulu on Sep 14, 2008 9:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
so we continue down the path with DA?
by Juannieboy on Sep 14, 2008 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey man, I think your records broken. Might want to fix it.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well come back with your answer mother fucker
by Juannieboy on Sep 14, 2008 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If our answer hasn’t been clear enough, here it is:
No.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uhm, it’s the second game and we are only down 7-0. At the half. To the Steelers.
ARE YOU INSANE?
by DrewskiC on Sep 14, 2008 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so do the steelers have the wind in the third, with the ball?
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 9:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes
They deferred, so they get the ball and we get the wind in the fourth.
by exposition on Sep 14, 2008 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
game could come down to wind advantage. crazy.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I suppose
But it seems more likely that the game will come down to the ability of Jamal Lewis to gain more than 1.66 yds/carry, our intermediate passing game to gel, and our D to continue to play well.
by exposition on Sep 14, 2008 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
See above
for a total meltdown on my part
by exposition on Sep 14, 2008 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
1.66? ouch.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, take out his 6 yard long and it’s 9 carries for 9 yards!
by exposition on Sep 14, 2008 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well at least he's umm.....consistent?
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't feel bad, Kellen
I was screaming you were open, too
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rogers is a man-beast
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
uh oh...Robaire is down
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey, I know what we really need: more injuries on the defensive side.
Yeah, that. Let’s have that.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 10:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Huh. Wonder where ol’ Pokorny is.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is why
Romeo Crennel should not be a head coach and Der"wreck" Anderson is a backup QB. How many times are the Browns going to look confused, not call timeouts, stupid ass pentalties and bad real bad INT’s
enough already, same old song and dance
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Sep 14, 2008 10:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
well aren't you a ray of sunshine
Though Romeo IS on my last freakin’ nerve
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its called 43 years of this nonsence. It is old hat
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Sep 14, 2008 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
back breaker there. run the damn route far enough. shut up, madden.
by kwoog on Sep 14, 2008 10:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
another Punt. Romeo, you pussy
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
C'mon, we got that!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Awww crap.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would love another replay, and as many replays as possible in Cleveland Browns Stadium.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 10:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If Romeo wastes a timeout on this, I will flip
by Roger Dorn on Sep 14, 2008 10:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
*prepares for Dorn Flip*
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Holy shit. 47 yards.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 14, 2008 10:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mike Adams late coming over as the deep help, awesome job Adams.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 10:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
D’Quell Jackson knew where that play was going and he didn’t do shit.
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 10:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’d be all for putting Brady Quinn in…
On Defense.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 14, 2008 10:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
R.Smith is gone, C. Williams got injured too…why not?
by rufio on Sep 14, 2008 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs