Dawgs By Nature: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

Browns' Offense, Crennel's Coaching Inept Again in 10-6 Loss to Steelers

Box Score - 9.14.08
Team 1 2 3 4 Final
0 7 3 0 10
0 0 3 3 6

We're off to a worse start than last season at 0-2, and the only optimism you can really take out of the first two games now is that there is a chance we lost to the best teams in the NFC (Dallas) and AFC (Pittsburgh). There's no need to sugarcoat the situation though: as fans, we expected the Browns to live up to expectations against the league's upper-tier teams. Sure, we'll go to Baltimore next week and probably blow them out of the water. For the rest of the season now, we're going to have to fight our way back from being 2.5 games away from the division lead.

We didn't embarrass ourselves against Pittsburgh, and we probably should've come away with a victory had it not been for one thing, which will be what my entire "goat of the game" section will be dedicated to this week...

Goat of the Game (Feel the Fire)

    08week2tomlin_medium
    Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin, cheering on his team as Romeo Crennel wastes timeouts.
  1. Romeo Crennel: It's not the 0-2 record that has him under fire. Instead, it's the fact that the most remedial, yet most critical, aspect of the game -- time management -- is severely lacking for the second week in a row. This week, it was more of a problem because there was a high percentage chance of the Browns coming back.

    Before the first half came to a close, there was a good amount of time on the clock to run a two-minute drill. After moving the ball fairly well for the first time of the game, the timeouts were taken 7-8 seconds too late. Maybe if we had that extra time, Anderson would've run a fade route to Braylon Edwards before even trying to fire a pass over the middle to Syndric Steptoe. As not to overly crowd the goat of the game section here, I'll continue the discussion on Crennel in "general notes".

Awarding Game Balls (Tough in Defeat)

    08week2parker_medium
    S Brodney Pool stops Willie Parker. The defense, especially DT Shaun Rogers, held Parker in check for once.
  1. Shaun Rogers: For the second consecutive week, Rogers was the most dominant player on the defensive side of the ball. Rogers recorded 5 tackles and sacked Roethlisberger once. One of his tackles was especially nice, as he drove Willie Parker hard into the ground. I was a little iffy on the late hit to Roethislberger -- it should've been a flag based on the league rules, but I love the toughness.
  2. Dave Zastudil: You know it wasn't a great game when you lose and your punter is given a game ball. Nonetheless, although both punters were getting off great punts considering the windy conditions, Zastudil was especially exceptional. On 5 attempts, he averaged 53 yards a boot, without any shanks to speak of. For all of our offensive shortcomings, he helped our defense out by giving them room to work with.

General Thoughts (Random Tidbits on the Game)

  1. Crennel (Continued): Carrying over from my "goat of the game" section here: with only a little over three minutes left in the game and the Browns down by seven, Crennel sent the field goal unit onto the field. Again, the entire stadium erupted in boos, even as the kick went through the uprights. I don't care that our defense has stopped the Steelers most of the game -- Roethlisberger is an efficient quarterback with proven ability to close out games, and our defense has consistently shown the inability to give our offense the ball back at the end of a game with a three-and-out effort. If Crennel's strategy was to give us the opportunity to drive 74 yards in 26 seconds without any timeouts, then he succeeded, much to the dismay of the fans and probably every player in the locker room.
  2. Crennel (Continued): This decision really emphasizes how flawed Crennel's time management is, and Al Michaels and John Madden also pointed this out during the live broadcast. We took a timeout with 2:42 left in the 4th quarter. Why take that timeout? The Steelers would've been forced to run a play anyway during that stretch, taking the clock to the two-minute mark while preserving a timeout still. Hell, you don't even need to play or coach football to know that strategy: a few games of Madden (video game), and you've got the concept down pat. To see Crennel just seem completely oblivious to the strategy makes me speechless.
  3. Wind Hurts Cribbs: Damn the winds, because that really took Joshua Cribbs' abilities on kick returns out of the gameplan. Officially, he only had one kick return the entire game -- partially due to the Steelers not scoring much, but mostly due to the ball having to be taken for a touchback. We only saw one Flash Package play too, and it was a successful reverse on third down. 
  4. 08week2anderson_medium
    QB Derek Anderson throws a pass against the Steelers in windy conditions.
  5. Anderson Wasn't Good: Last week, I said that Derek Anderson wasn't bad. This week, I'm saying he wasn't good. Although his completion percentage was a little bit higher, he threw two interceptions that were all on him. On the first one, Anderson underthrew Edwards deep with the wind in his favor. Right before the second half, I just don't get the decision to throw the ball on a rocket slant pattern. It reminded me too much of the awful throws into zone coverage over the middle he made against the Oakland Raiders and the Cincinnati Bengals last season.
  6. Defensive Props: Overall, the defense deserves a round of applause for their effort against Pittsburgh. First, let's start with the run defense. For us always getting torched by Willie Parker, especially when he gets more carries, we held him to 105 yards on 28 carries, a 3.8 yards-per-carry average. The defensive line was plugged consistently, with a variety of players being able to come up and make the stop on Parker.
  7. Solid Game for Pool: It's a real shame that Sean Jones is out, but at least we have Pool back. I thought he made his mark early on in the game, delivering a big hit on a deep incompletion during the Steelers' first series. It doesn't look "great" that the secondary gave up passing plays of 48 and 31 yards, but Eric Wright and Brandon McDonald played more like I had hoped they would against the Cowboys.
  8. Pooch Kickoff Recovery: For whatever reason, Mewelde Moore and Rashard Mendenhall were completely clueless when it came to returning kicks and punts. They never judged the wind properly, with kicks often going over their heads. That led to a great call by Ted Dashier when a pooch kick down the field was called -- we HAD the clear shot at the ball first, but after failing to pick it up, a Steeler was able to bat it out of bounds. That would've tied the game right there had we recovered, and who knows what would've transpired from there.
  9. Still Had Them Backed Up: After the failed pooch recovery, we still had the Steelers backed up at the two-yard line. After a rush for no gain on first down though, for whatever reason we didn't bring pressure on second down. Big Ben had too much time to throw from his end zone, and recorded a nice 35-yard completion to Hines Ward. This is where you can't like the inconsistencies of Mel Tucker's defensive schemes -- clearly a situation where a blitz would've been appropriate.
  10. Run, Harrison...arg!: Take a look at this statistic from the San Diego Chargers game:

    LaDainian Tomlinson: 10 carries, 26 yards. 2 catches, 14 yards.
    Darren Sproles: 7 carries, 53 yards. 2 catches, 72 yards, 1 touchdown.

    My point here is not to say that Jerome Harrison should start over Jamal Lewis. I've compared Harrison to Sproles before, and when Sproles was given the chance, he lit it up -- maybe not as a pure running back, but as a "back out of the backfield". Harrison had the most exciting offensive play of the game for Cleveland, going across the entire width of the field for 23 yards, using his blockers appropriately. Had he not stepped our just barely, I think he would've gone the distance for a touchdown.

    With Stallworth out and Edwards struggling, Cribbs and Harrison can provide the "X-Factor" on offense. Shamefully, they were only given two meaningful snaps all game.
  11. Edwards' Game: It's very discouraging to see Edwards struggle so much over the first two games, considering he was our best offensive player all of last season. Honestly, all of our offensive issues go back to this. The past few years, the Carolina Panthers have had an explosive offense if Steve Smith is healthy. Barring the past two games, when he's our or injured, everything goes downhill. That's the funk the Browns are in right now. Fix Edwards, and the offense will be in sync, with or without Donte Stallworth.
  12. How to Fix Edwards: That's up for discussion. Extra reps? More passes his way? I don't know. He has no problem getting off to a great start in training camp, so it's hard to imagine how he'd be so off the past two weeks, with or without preparation. You don't lose the ability to catch the football with a foot injury.
  13. Power Outage: With the power on my street going out at 5 PM, I waited for it to come back on until 8 PM. At that point, I rushed over to a friend's house to watch the game, hoping a tree didn't fall on top of me on the way.
  14. Come Back Tucker: Not that Rex Hadnot did anything bad, but I want to see Ryan Tucker back in the starting lineup. The offensive line gave up two sacks late, but overall, the pass-protection against the Steelers' blitzes was top-notch.
  15. Seeing a Shootout: Seeing the Browns' offense struggle against the Cowboys' defense last week, only to see the Philadelphia Eagles handle it with no problems on Monday Night Football, doesn't make us look any better.
  16. Lewis' Key: The key in the offseason was for Jamal Lewis to deliver against one team: the Pittsburgh Steelers. Though various other reasons contributed to him not having a great game, the fact still remains that performance-wise, he's basically "0-for-3" against Pittsburgh when it comes to high-quality play.
  17. Brownies: Was that Nick Sorensen in on an early sack? Phil Dawson handled the winds fine, but darn Jeff Reed for handling them fine too. The Steelers have now won 10 straight against the Browns. Though we completed 46% of our third downs to only the 25% conversion rate for the Steelers, it didn't help out our offense.

I started off the review stating that there can't be much optimism after the first two games. While that's true, the optimism will start to grow again with every win we put on the board. Last season, we started the year off at 1-2, and one of those losses included a game against the Steelers. We'll be in the same position this year if we beat the Ravens in Baltimore. I considered the Ravens one of the league's worst teams heading into the season, and I still stand by that argument. If our offense gets in sync just a little bit, these next two games should be in the bag. If not, then the season is clearly a disappointment, and the only thing that can ensue the remainder of the season will be chaos.

0 recs  |  Comment 20 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good write-up for a really crappy game.

Couldn’t agree more about Harrison. We need to get the ball to our playmakers. Cribbs, Harrison, Winslow, Edwards, Stallworth (Whenever the hell he comes back). It seems everytime we get Cribbs involved, good things happen.

Any news on Martin Rucker? I would love to see some 2 TE sets when he comes back. Hieden is a nice player, but Rucker has the skills to make a difference. I think he has been out four months now.

Oh, and Shaun Rogers is a freak, the injury to Robaire really could effect him. We need to keep Shaun healthy and fresh. Rubin needs to step up and become a factor and give Big Shaun a breather every now and then.

I really hate Hines Ward.

by Bernie19Kosar on Sep 17, 2008 5:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I want to see Rucker too. The initial word on the injury was 6 weeks, and I believe it has been about that long…should I be worried about staph yet?

by rufio on Sep 18, 2008 1:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Still hopeful.

I like coming to read this blog. It seems like everywhere else I look it just people shouting to swap QB’s and can coaches. Even after another disappointing loss, this is a great place to read what seems to be the only even-keeled analysis out there. Anyways.

Has Hall been getting much playing time? I keep trying to remind myself to look for him, but frankly if a guy doesn’t do something to get noticed, I don’t tend to see what he’s doing in the game.

by JustBob on Sep 17, 2008 9:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I saw him at least twice in the game. He was on the left side and didn’t do anything exciting. That’s not to say he didn’t do anything well, but he is playing.

by rufio on Sep 18, 2008 1:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe you hit the nail on the head here but....

Everyone has bashed Romeo and deserverously so but alot of the Browns faithful seem to think it is solely his job to lead the team. But consider this….. I think a team is in trouble if it has to depend on the head coach to be the leader on the field as well as off the field.
 
Who should be leading the Browns on the field? Answer. The team captains oblivously. DA should provide it for the offense but he has been terrible in both games so I dont buy your analysis that he wasnt that bad against the Cowpies and wasnt good against the Steelers. He needs to lead the offense to touchdowns and thus far he has been piss poor at doing it. Without scores, RC is placed into having to make the right call and second guessed for being ….well, stupid. I think part of the problem with Romeo is that he does not have confidence in DA. He’s likely trying to make it close as possible score -wise and hope something good happens before time runs out.

Just wondering what it would be like to play with a LEAD on the scoreboard

Bottom line is that we need some decent play by the QB that leadsto some scores and some confidence by the head coach that he does not have to be perfect because the game is getting out of hand or closer than it should be!

by Juannieboy on Sep 17, 2008 9:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Edwards

Chris, I really believe that this is a big problem on the offense this year too. I think we have lost our aggressiveness, but that is another post. I think Edwards, when he plays like last year not only puts points on the board and racks up yards for himself, but also draws a lot of safety help. And LB help, and all around defensive help. This contributes to other WRs/TEs having an easier time getting open. If a D is not afraid of Braylon, they can lock down more on other targets.

In your analogy, don’t forget that Delhomme wasn’t healthy for a lot of that time either, and that the Panthers have had no legitimate passing options outside of Smith. Now that Moose is back, they don’t feel the loss of Smith as much. (p.s. how does Musin automatically become a legitimate threat when he is in Carolina and lose that legitimacy as soon as he isn’t?)

Simultaneously, if the 2nd/3rd WR are not dangerous, and can be covered 1 on 1, the opposing defense is free to send more blitzers, or cover Braylon and Kellen with more guys, which kills us. Correcting either of these things will be synergistic to our offense, and help alleviate the other problem.

How to fix him: Keep going his way, but don’t expect him to carry our offense, or do the things he did last year right away. If he feels like he has to put points on the board all by himself right away, the first time he drops a ball it could start an avalanche. Let him know we still have confidence in him, that we will need him to make big plays to win games, eventually. Keep going deep to him, keep using him, but don’t throw to him as often. Extra reps in practice, especially in situations where he could get hit. In practice, it should be harder than in the games: give the defense an advantage, handicap Edwards, or both. Get him to succeed once in a situation that is almost impossible, then go back to normal situations and it should be easy. In the game, get a play or two where he should be really open and get back in to the groove a little bit. Get him some extra reps with DA. Do drills that focus on the little things, doing every thing right every time, and finishing the catch.

Glad you have power.

by rufio on Sep 18, 2008 2:05 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

So, the way to fix Braylon is to get someone qualified to catch the ball into the lineup on the other side of the field? I can buy that. Is Stallworth ever going to play for this team?

Platooning with Jamey Carroll is not freedom. Free Andy Marte!

Pronk Needs You

by woodsmeister on Sep 18, 2008 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have no idea. He has been a decent player when he has been on the field, but has never been able to stay on the field. I think he will play. I think a better question is “who of the following comes back first: Rucker, JJ, or Stallworth?”

And getting him a decent threat at WR2 is only half the solution. It will only HELP fix him, he still has to step up his own game. It won’t cure the dropsies. It looked like pitt had Polamalu staying man to man on Kellen all game, or at least mirroring the field so that he was on Kellen’s side all night. That means Braylon was probably left with a corner (who he should have beaten easily because the steelers corners suck) and pittsburgh’s other safety (who also isn’t all that great). TO can abuse that matchup, Moss can abuse that matchup, Andre Johnson has made his career out of abusing that matchup, Braylon needs to be able to abuse it if he wants to be a top 5 receiver in the NFL.

by rufio on Sep 18, 2008 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BOLD STATEMENT

“Sure, we’ll go to Baltimore next week and probably blow them out of the water”

Are you serious with that statement? Its the browns, I wouldn’t guaranteed a win vs a college team. I’m sure you have been a browns fan longer then me since im only 23 but even I know that a Browns game is never a sure thing.

by spineshanker93 on Sep 18, 2008 2:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It was sort of a “we may be able to beat the the easy teams still, but what good will that do us in hoping for a deep run?” type of statement.

Though I do stand by my statement that we should blow out the Ravens, if we are indeed a better than average football team.

Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.

by Chris Pokorny on Sep 19, 2008 7:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good write up Chris. I listened on a battery powered radio for most of the game and it sounded terrible. As a team, we are disjointed and seem complacent almost to the point of laziness. I really think that overconfidence is a huge problem on this team right now. Horse Balls is saying there is nothing wrong with the offense, Romeo seems to think that we are fine and everyone (media and fans included) seems to think that Baltimore is as good as done already.

I said 7-9 before the season started and was widely derided. I ask the 10-6 crowd, where do you see those wins now?

by fwembt on Sep 18, 2008 9:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Getting inside these guys’ heads can be hard. If I were feeling the pressure of a first round pick behind me, and not being anywhere close to where I thought I would be as a player, I would try to believe I was “fine” too.

The defense seemed to play with good energy most of the night. Especially Rogers. He was pretty sick. As always, the TV cameras don’t follow the DBs and WRs much, but they looked ok. Pool seemed to have good energy, and was up near the line of scrimmage making good plays with good hustle pretty often. When Ben dropped back to pass, if we sent blitzers we usually made him at least roll out or throw early, but when we just rushed 3 or 4 all our rushers just got blocked and couldn’t do anything. Every time a steeler caught a pass, he was supposed to be covered by Mike Adams.

The O, on the other hand, didn’t look too hot. Except Winslow. And Joe Thomas. I am still seeing 9-7, thinking we can beat the teams we are supposed to and steal one from pitt, Jax, Ind, and/or Philly after McNabb/Westabrook get hurt and we find our offensive playbook.

by rufio on Sep 18, 2008 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope you are right. 9-7 still gives us a good shot.

by fwembt on Sep 19, 2008 2:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

depending on the status of the Colts and Chargers…the AFC might be a LOT worse than last year.

by rufio on Sep 20, 2008 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Browns will go 5-11 this year. We beat mediocre teams last year. This year the schedule is way more difficult. The team has lost the “Eye of the Tiger” (no will to win) as evidenced by Crennels’s words before the Dallas game “I hope we can hold em”. What a way to lead a team…“I hope we can hold em”. He should of said “We are gonna go out there and kick some ass and not look back!”

by BROWNS GREATEST SEASONS 1996 1997 1998 on Sep 21, 2008 5:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That has been RAC’s style 10-6 or 0-2. He hasn’t changed. You are what I like to call “hopeless”.

by rufio on Sep 21, 2008 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, let’s be fair to the 10-6 crowd. If you were to pick 2 losses of the 6, most of us might point to the first two games even before the season started. Obviously, I would have preferred at least a split to open the season, but I initially was banking on being no worse than 2-2 at the bye. I still think we get there.

by Roger Dorn on Sep 19, 2008 7:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

agree with 2-2

I said that I would be happy going into the bye at 2-2 but we will have to beat Pitt at there place now to make the playoffs which will be very tough. I dont see any AFC North team making the playoffs as a wildcard with the schedule we got. Hopefully Pitt will hit the skids.

by spineshanker93 on Sep 19, 2008 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah beating pitt at pitt is always a daunting task. But, Indy looks beatable right now, if we could find our offense. Then again, if they find theirs we are screwed. I could see McNabb and Westbrook both getting hurt before we have to play Philly, that would be sort of sadistically nice. Jacksonville looks REALLY beatable right now. Especially if we can stop the run. That’s another team that looked really scary before the season. Anything can happen.

by rufio on Sep 20, 2008 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

Start posting about the Browns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Info on Peyton Hillis
Small
Next Up on the Tradining block....
20051225mf_fbn_fan_takedownpj_450_small
Quinn and 2nd round pick to Broncos for Marshal
Troy_smith_small
About the Jake Delhomme acquisition.
4horsemen_small
Possible Mid round Sleepers.
Twitter-av_small
Why didn't we trade for McNabb or Kolb?
Rogerdorn_small
The Pittsburgh Steelers are Hypocrites?
4horsemen_small
Dear Mike Holmgren,
4horsemen_small
Want to know if Berry falls to #7? It depends on Mike Shanahan and the Redskins.
Wvu_small
How Long Before Our Brownies Are in PlayOff Contention?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Turf Show Times
Random Ramsdom: 3/18/2010
Acme Packing Company
What's Going On In Seattle?
Mocking The Draft
Brandon LaFell NFL Draft scouting report

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo

Florida's Joe Haden Improves Forty Yard Dash Time

Photo link

Falcons Hosting Pre-Draft Workout With Mizzou LB Sean Weatherspoon

Photo link

Bills Will Meet Pre-Draft With Texas QB Colt McCoy

More from SBNation.com >


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Moderators

Pryor_small Buckeye Brad