Cleveland Browns vs. Cincinnati Bengals - Official Game Thread
Cleveland Browns at Cincinnati Bengals, Sep 28, 2008 1:00 PM EDT
| CLEVELAND BROWNS (0-3) | WEEK 4 | CINCINNATI BENGALS (0-3) | |||
![]() |
VS. | ![]() |
|||
| Date: | September 28, 2008 | Location: | Cincinnati, OH |
| Time: | 1:00 p.m. ET |
Stadium: | Paul Brown Stadium |
| TV: | CBS |
Favorite: | Bengals by 3½ |
| Radio: | WMMS, 100.7 FM | Over/Under: | 44½ |
| SBN Coverage: | Cincy Jungle | Announcers |
Kevin Harlan, Rich Gannon |
The Battle of "O-Win-No" seems a little more appropriate, as the Cleveland Browns and the Cincinnati Bengals each enter this game with an 0-3 record. The Browns need to build some momentum heading into the bye week. This game literally means everything in the world to the futures of both Derek Anderson and Romeo Crennel. With a win, and I mean a good win, they will both last beyond the bye week. With a loss, we will be looking ahead to next season. The Bengals' problem is their defense -- if you can't stop anybody and your offense can't compete in a shootout anymore, then what chance do you have?
Can the Browns finally get their first victory of the season? Let's kick off the preview with the overall team statistics thus far...
OFFENSE
| Category | Browns | Bengals |
| Points Scored | 8.6 (32nd) | 13.3 (29th) |
| Passing | 122.7 (31st) | 152.0 (26th) |
| Rushing | 71.3 (30th) | 86.7 (25th) |
| Total Offense (yards) | 194.0 (32nd) | 238.7 (30th) |
DEFENSE
| Category | Browns | Bengals |
| Points Scored | 22.0 (18th) | 22.3 (20th) |
| Passing | 202.0 (18th) | 178.7 (12th) |
| Rushing | 145.0 (25th) | 174.3 (28th) |
| Total Defense (yards) | 347.0 (23rd) | 353.0 (24th) |
|
Quarterback
I was originally going to give the Bengals the edge here, but when I heard that Carson Palmer was ruled out due to injury, the edge goes back to Derek Anderson. Though he has not performed well over the first three weeks of the season, he has a lot more starting experience than Ryan Fitzpatrick does. Anderson's season is on the line here -- if he starts off the game with a hot hand, then he will live to see another day as a starter. If he throws interceptions or leads several three-and-outs in a row, then Brady Quinn will receive serious consideration from Romeo Crennel. |
|
Running Back
Neither the Browns nor the Bengals have gotten their ground games going -- each team is averaging less than 100 yards per game. In Lewis' case though, it seems to have more to do with the Browns falling behind and abandoning the run than it does Lewis having a sub par season. Reports have indicated that the Browns are committed to focusing their entire gameplan around Lewis this week, especially after his outcry for more touches following last week's game. Crennel also stated for the second consecutive week that they will try to give Jerome Harrison a few more touches. Let's see if he's actually true to his word this week. |
|
Receiver
Right now, Braylon Edwards is struggling more than any receiver in football besides Chad Johnson. When you cancel both of those players out of the equation, it boils down to T.J. Houshmandzadeh against Syndric Steptoe. I think I'd take Houshmandzadeh any day of the week in that contest. The Browns still have Kellen Winslow at their disposal, but Anderson's chemistry with him hasn't been very high. The Bengals have had more support from Antonio Chatman on their depth chart to give them the slight edge heading into the game. Overall, the Browns still have the better talent. |
|
Offensive Line
Eric Steinbach, after originally being reported as having an injury that would keep him out 3-5 weeks, is ACTIVE for today's game against the Bengals. That means the Browns' line should be completely healthy, and thank goodness -- Seth McKinney was horrible last week and also affected the play of Joe Thomas. The Bengals haven't had a dominant offensive line the past several years, something that has corresponded to the struggles of Carson Palmer. |
|
Defensive Line With the Bengals struggling to get their running game going and an inexperience quarterback under center, this is a perfect opportunity for Shaun Rogers to put the heat on. Remember, we originally thought that the Cincinnati Bengals had acquired Rogers in the offseason, but then the deal was void and we ended up getting him instead. The Bengals only have one sack through three games, so trying to win the battle in the trenches shouldn't be much of a threat. |
|
Linebacker
The Browns don't have playmakers at linebacker. On the other side of the field though, the Bengals don't even have guys that can tackle. Just take a look at their Week 1 matchup against the Baltimore Ravens, when they allowed Joe Flacco to run down the field for a 33 yard touchdown. Lewis could be in for a big day -- recall last season that he ran for over 200 yards against them in Week 2. |
|
Secondary
Though the defensive backs were a big concern heading into the season, Brandon McDonald and Eric Wright have definitely held their own. The Bengals have yet to record a single interception this season and are not known as having a shutdown secondary. |
|
Special Teams
Could this be the week that Joshua Cribbs makes the impact we've been looking for? If it's a high-scoring affair, then he'll get a lot of looks. Phil Dawson has been perfect this season, but he has not had any meaningful attempts yet. Hopefully he'll be able to make more of an impact on the game this week. |
FINAL PREDICTION: Cleveland Browns 24, Cincinnati Bengals 9.
If Carson Palmer was playing, I was thinking of picking the Bengals to defeat the Browns. With Ryan Fitzpatrick under center, things aren't going to be good for the Bengals. They struggled to move the ball the first two weeks due to awful schemes and playcalling -- only Palmer's abilities were able to bail him out of that. Unless Anderson single-handedly loses this game again, we shouldn't have any problems taking care of the Bengals. Tough to say when you're 0-3 though, eh?
This is the official gameday topic for the Cleveland Browns in Week 4 as they face off against the Cincinnati Bengals. All comments regarding the game should be posted in this topic. Enjoy the game, and GO BROWNS!!!
0 recs |
606 comments
Comments
No Palmer sounds good to me. No excuses for not winning this one.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 12:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Is Ian Eagle doing this game? I hope so.
Him and Solomon Wilcots are my favourite broadcast team.
Aw, it’s not. :-(
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://nbaokc.blogspot.com/
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on Sep 28, 2008 1:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i wonder what size shoes Fitzpatrick wears…Madden would tell me
by jill29 on Sep 28, 2008 1:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Say it with me now. No third and longs
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 28, 2008 1:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
LOL
The announcer seems dead set on telling us how much both of the teams suck.
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://nbaokc.blogspot.com/
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on Sep 28, 2008 1:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey, we got a first down! wooo!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice Jamal. Andre (K?)nott said we would be looking for “balance” this week on O. I took that to mean we would run the whole game.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
whatever works
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jason Wright sighting
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good to see(well, hear) Heiden out there
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
OMG
Stop with the running plays! What’s wrong with a short pass?
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://nbaokc.blogspot.com/
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on Sep 28, 2008 1:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
AH, settling for the 3. How Romeo.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Do you think Romeo does anything when we have the ball? Besides hope we do well?
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he uses the time to sneak cookies
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought a PA was called for there on second down.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 28, 2008 1:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No one would have been expecting it on 3rd.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
radio
Listening on Sirius, it’s amazing how many commercials/sponsors they make Donovan interject into every single thing that happens.
by exposition on Sep 28, 2008 1:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
this message sponsered by Old Spice.
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 28, 2008 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats what I like about this NFL.com radio thing, no commercials
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
except when Donnovan has to say “that’s another first down brought to you by Safe Auto…”
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s why we have the Heinz Red Zone and the Safe Auto Minimum Coverage and the Time Warner Official’s Call and so on during the game.
by exposition on Sep 28, 2008 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m hoping for the “1000 Flushes Crappy Play of the Day”
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“hey, and that’s a Papajohns.com first down!”
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How many straight runs this drive?
by DisplacedBuckeye on Sep 28, 2008 1:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey at least at this rate Jamal will have 1800 yards this season.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
3
2nd & 3rd down, followed by a 1st down run
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Back now…liked the movement we got on the ball with Lewis on drive one. Next drive, it’s time to test what Anderson can bring to the table today.
The Bengals do not look good on offense right now. Way too tentative.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
New QB can cause that kind of thing
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bengals were tentative the first two weeks of the season with Palmer.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh…why Harrison, why!
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hahaha, penalty keeps our first down.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harrison! dammit!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Miami’s direct snaps work.
Jacksonville’s direct snaps work.
Browns’ direct snap fails.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know how anyone’s work. I wouldn’t believe that anyone other than maybe LT was actually going to throw the ball.
And Randle El.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And what I mean by that is we need to completely take DA out of the game and at least give the threat of one other thing: read-option, roll out pass option, something, it’s pretty clear we are going to run the ball there.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trick play for Cribbs. too bad it didn’t work like, at all
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Steptoe with a tight catch? Still, against the Bengals’ defense, how in the world can the coverage be that tight? Get open!
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
“Steptoe caught it”. Hmm, odd phrase
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
did you see how he starred him down the whole way? Steptoe #1 option?
by Guage80 on Sep 28, 2008 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bang! At least Crennel has been a little more true to Harrison this week.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and then Cribbs taketh away
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Andre talking about the lack of 20+yd plays in the offense
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
sounded like a sweet block by good ol’ Vickers
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah sounded that way here too haha.
Those are the types of guys we need to step up to make our offense legit while Stallworth/JJ/Rucker?/etc are out.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can we get a change of announcers? Harlan and Gannon are way too monotone for football action…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Chini-doom. Good name for a D-lineman
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Seriously, we need to take a shot deep to Braylon. None of these guys could cover him last year, so at worst, he will drop it.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Man, we’re having some trouble with those elite Bengal CBs
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice punt
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Phil Dawson: MVP
Phil Dawson: Browns Hall of Famer?
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 1:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah.. Derek Anderson still stinks.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 1:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
he should try Old Spice Double Action. its two things
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
On the pass to Winslow, it could’ve been a little more to the outside. But, I think Winslow could’ve done a better job shielding his body to an undersized, young cornerback in Leon Hall.
The next pass…looked ugly, but the CBS crew do a bad job of truly showing what the “confusion” from Steve Sanders was. I certainly wouldn’t bench Anderson just yet.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
or it could have lead Winslow, just a bit. It was about 15 yards short of where it should have been thrown.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
on the radio they said Sanders was saying he was held by a LB.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think this is wrong. Edwards and Sanders were talking/yelling at eachother about routes.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t see a thing, I can only listen to Doug Diken. (sp?)
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two screen plays, including the one Harrison missed where DA’s fault as was the Winslow pass throughing it short. If your bar is DA not throwing INTs then he will never be benched. Luckily for you that’s Romeo’s bar too…
by Guage80 on Sep 28, 2008 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your bar was not to play Anderson at all.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would love a shutout today. I would settle for under 10 points and 1 KW sack.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow! What a play by Brandon McDonald…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
sounds like he is having a good game so far.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
WOO! big hit by McD!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How do you give any quarterback that open of a middle to run on any down?
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
if he tries that again I hope we can hit him a little harder
by cleveland teamer on Sep 28, 2008 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah…bad move on his part, especially with a lack of depth already at QB.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jeez….credit to the QB on those two plays, I guess.
by cleveland teamer on Sep 28, 2008 1:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Quinn commercial… hopefully EAS got a discount until he starts like the Browns did.
by Guage80 on Sep 28, 2008 1:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I know we want to “crowd” the line of scrimmage, but we have been offsides way too much the past 2 weeks.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
lining up in the neutral zone is just plain lazy.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
lack of discipline, which is caused by…shitty coaching
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two offsides so early against a quarterback like Fitzpatrick? Stop doing the guy favors…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Can’t believe we’re allowing this O to drive on us.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ridiculously poor containment on third downs by the Browns. Keep a defensive lineman plugging the middle.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Or someone in a short zone to watch him and catch him before he runs so far.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
do we have middle linebackers on our team?
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh, sweet Jesus.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The only reason the Bengals are moving the ball is Fitzpatricks running.
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://nbaokc.blogspot.com/
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on Sep 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Which we can't seem to stop
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would love to see him throw more…because that would probably mean some picks for us.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like the O will need to step up and score today.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
don’t worry, we have another 3-7 points to score today.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
and I thought I was negative. Funny though
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am thinking the defense can score that much for us.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
two words I'm dying to hear
pick…six
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There we go — bring some pressure up the middle on third down.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I like hearing that we blitzed and the QB didn’t run for 15+ yards.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Least we kept them out of the end zone
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I expect a true playaction deep pass about 3-4 plays into this next drive.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I pray for one
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DA heading for a solid first half, 2/5 for 13 yds…
by Guage80 on Sep 28, 2008 1:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
we don’t have a passing game with DA in…
by Guage80 on Sep 28, 2008 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess that’d fall on Chud.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL… you are right around the problem but like Romeo seem to miss it
by Guage80 on Sep 28, 2008 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We get it…you’re hoping Quinn gets in. It still doesn’t excuse some of the playcalling.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah the fact that we haven’t gone PA yet is pretty ridiculous. And the Bengals are shifting more than we are, which was a trademark of our offense last year. No unbalanced line….way too vanilla.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anderson has one of the least convincing PA’s I’ve seen. I actually think the first down play was PA.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Bengals are packing the line — have to make them respect the pass now.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jason Wright should’ve picked Ndukwe up as opposed to helping out the center/left guard area.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Wriight blew the assignment
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But he’s been hurting us all game….and he is not that good of a player.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We’re also making Fitzpatrick look good
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there was 2 blitzers coming untouched. Wright picked the first one.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The first blitzer was picked up by Steinbach.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jesus Christ on a cracker
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
In my best Barack Obama impression:
“Folks, lets be clear. Derek Anderson is not an NFL QB.”
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 1:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
PICK!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
you could have made that play though- thrown right to him and no traffic.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am just surprised he can actually do something worthwhile i.e. catch the ball.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe we should make him a WR
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mike Adams shows up for work
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe he was just baiting QBs through the first 2 games to throw his way, and now he is capitalizing.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For a backup, I thought he has filled in better-than-expected overall.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The games I actually saw, he was always the one making the tackle after he let the opposing receiver get wide open to catch the ball. Now that I can’t see it he gets 2 picks. I should just stick to the radio.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pick by Adams! Not great field position though after an illegal block in the back :-/
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 1:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
better than a kick in the nuts
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would probably take one to the balls to negate a key Browns penalty.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harlan: “…but the defense fights through.”
Really? Harrison had a pretty big gain there.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
REVERSE
with Harrison, no less. It worked and everything
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
3 TE set! could be interestin
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I like it. Heiden and Dinkins are worth more than Steptoe and Cribbs the WR.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anderson’s pass to Lewis — one of his best plays this season.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I like his accuracy on the 4-foot pass. Would like to see that on a 15-yarder.
by cleveland teamer on Sep 28, 2008 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Getting a lot more use out of Harrison and Wright today
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Come on, Harrison…find the marker first!
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
GO FOR IT
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not liking 1 for 5 on 3rd down. Liking the decision to go for it.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I count 5 plays to Harrison so far: 2 runs, the reverse, 2 pass targets.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 2:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He was also in as a decoy when we did something to Lewis. Are you counting his drop?
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DAMMIT TO FUCKING HELL
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ugh…that one hurts.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Gannon: “Derek Anderson too good of a player”
WRONG, that is as good a player as Derek Anderson has ever been.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 2:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Fitzpatrick has been so bad today…it will be a crime if we lose this game.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Was expecting Lewis to plow into the line. Dammit, he was WIDE OPEN
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
PICK!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I wash my hands of Anderson, thank god we are playing Ryan Fitzpatrick…
Never mind, good job Eric Wright :S
by Estonianzulu on Sep 28, 2008 2:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Clearly when your running game is clicking on all cylinders and your QB is sucking up the stadium, it’s time to throw on 4th and 1.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
oh, you’ve got to be kidding me.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Interception City.
And then the fumble. What a comedy of errors this game is.
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://nbaokc.blogspot.com/
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on Sep 28, 2008 2:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is ridiculous…heck of a pick by Eric Wright, but then he loses it…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nooooooooooooooooooooo!
I know how men in exile feed on dreams of hope. (Aeschylus, Agamemnon)
by portland, oregon on Sep 28, 2008 2:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ryan Fitzpatrick is better than Derek Anderson.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 2:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Can we get a do-over on training camp? Mulligan!
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
this game is bad for my blood pressure.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Admittedly, I would not be upset if we came out the 2nd half with Quinn.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
anyone who would be upset needs help.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hell, at this point they could come out with Todd Philcox and I’d live with it
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t be surprised if we see Quinn in the second half now. I still have my share of faith for Anderson, but we can’t go much further without doing something to jump start things.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m still not sure why you have the faith coming into this game, but how can you have watched this half and still think he is a NFL starter????
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because I still remember the potential Derek Anderson showed when he was at his best, and I refuse to believe he’s fully at his best right now.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
His best? When he was completing 55% with lots of TDs and INTs getting lucky with an aweseom receiving core against bad teams???
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boy, I thought our game’s score was a boring first half…then you look around at the rest of the scores and see much of the same.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Denver isn’t helping my fantasy status as much as they usually do.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I like Pool on the blitz. I would send him and S.Jones at the QB a lot if they were both healthy.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Eric Wright
Anyone who saw it, was that fumble as flukey as it sounded? Or did Wright screw up?
by exposition on Sep 28, 2008 2:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
eh- he was a little loose with the ball and their RB put his helmet on the ball.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Alex Hall continues to be a bright spot
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Phil Savage is the worst GM ever. He can’t ever find talent in the late rounds! We should fire him with Romeo. The Browns suck and have sucked forever and will suck forever meeehhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
p.s. I am not mocking you, but I am mocking.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I assumed.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder what they are going to show for the highlights for this game
by orangemocha on Sep 28, 2008 2:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully Brady Quinn in the 2nd half?
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully Jerome Harrison getting a dumpoff and weaving 60+ yards for a TD
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that Wright INT play sums it up pretty nicely.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BTW, is it just me or has Ocho Cinco lost a step?
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
WTF is wrong with Romeo? stopped them on 3rd down, two timeouts, why didn’t we throw a timeout to get the ball back with well over 50 seconds left…
by Estonianzulu on Sep 28, 2008 2:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Trying to get into halftime so he can get a snack.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah WTF a timeout would have given us a few chances.
by vegasbrown on Sep 28, 2008 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I think we all know Romeo sucks at clock management.
by kjc on Sep 28, 2008 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he still thinks those first half TOs rollover
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can we get a Hail Mary attempt here?
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
what was the over under for this game
by orangemocha on Sep 28, 2008 2:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Check in the game preview at the top.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was a pretty dumb call by Marvin Lewis.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Definitely.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Against a real team, maybe. Against us, it worked just fine.
by Estonianzulu on Sep 28, 2008 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s still a crazy-dumb call. Even if we have a worse chance of scoring than the average team. Our chances from, say, our own 35 are way worse than our chances from wherever we ended up. Just because it worked doesn’t mean it was smart. Shanahan was a moron going for 2 in the DEN/SD game too.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jamal Lewis is our leading receiver… Thats not good.
by kjc on Sep 28, 2008 2:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Quick Poll: Who will be the Starting QB in the 2nd Half, Who Should be?
by Guage80 on Sep 28, 2008 2:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I’ll go with saying they give Anderson the reigns since we get the ball first. If he can’t produce a score, he’s out.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know, I knew this team wouldn’t be as good this year as last. I was prepared for a step back. But this complete regression is insane.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I expected a step back W-L wise, but we don’t even look like the same team.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the worst part is- the defense has played relatively well in each game.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Run defense is a vast improvement.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uggg, once again the only think i feel like I have to look forward to is next years draft. Of course, we’ll pass on Beanie and he’ll become the next Jim Brown.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I honestly don’t know if he is coming out this year. He will have plenty of injury concerns, he wants a Heisman, he has said he is staying all 4 years…
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to take anything off Anderson, but Harrison’s failed first down (leading to Anderson’s bad throw to Heiden on fourth down) was a big play.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I was one of the biggest Anderson backers going into this year, but the simple fact is there just isn’t any spark there. He just doesn’t look right to me. Something is wrong and for the most part he hasn’t looked right since losing to Cincinnati last year.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He also had a drop.
But he has bailed us out plenty of times, and a QB rating in the 40s is absolutely terrible.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sweet…a nice return by Cribbs finally.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good start so far
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Upon my slow motion review, it looks like a clear catch by Steptoe. Unless there is a hidden juggle — then all bets are off.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If the Browns do not score on this drive do they go to Quinn?
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 2:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If it’s Anderson’s direct fault, probably. But if someone drops a pass or something wacky, probably not.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We will be just productive enough to keep Quinn on the bench
by Estonianzulu on Sep 28, 2008 2:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
…yay?
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shaffer blew that one I think.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Quinn
Nothing they’ve done or said seems to indicate they’d change QBs in the middle of a game barring an injury. I think Romeo’s just too stubborn.
by exposition on Sep 28, 2008 2:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
DA’s really begging for it though
by cleveland teamer on Sep 28, 2008 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Anderson should not have started, but I"m calling you out on this one. He is one of the few NFL coaches that have benched a healthy QB in the middle of the game… last year, game one, nonetheles.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, there’s the play where Anderson was at fault. Let’s see if Quinn starts warming up.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Straw that broke the camel’s back?
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
God help us.
bring in Brady “The Mighty” Quinn
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Time to show D.A. the bench. There’s no reason not to.
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 2:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
2 TD’s and 6 INT’s ……solid numbers by a pro bowl qb
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 2:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Seriously, I don’t care who is playing but whoever is on the field has to do a better job than this.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
5 of 12 for 44 yards and an interception….. Mike & Mike is gonna be funny tomorrow talking about Quinn.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Is Quinn warming up on the sideline? Don’t have direct TV… live in Florida.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And now Fitzpatrick is driving on our defense, we are making him look like friggin Tom Brady. With the first overall pick in the NFL Draft, the Cleveland Browns select…
by Estonianzulu on Sep 28, 2008 2:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Please, the Lions are so excited about drafting 1st overall without Millen at the helm, nothing will stop them from losing every game.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Come on, now…it wasn’t that bad. We’ve forced a punt now.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like Derek Anderson is coming back out.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep…let’s see what he can do from the 2-yard line.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I smell 3 and out or a pick six.
by Estonianzulu on Sep 28, 2008 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A safety didn’t cross your mind?
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, I'm thinking safety
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ARGGGG….. starting to be happy I didn’t get Direct TV this year. How does Quinn not get playing time?
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What does he have to do for Crennel to lose confidence in him….This is like Eric Wedge having a man crush on Casey Blake and forgetting that Andy Marte was building card castles on the bench
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even our special teams don’t seem to be doing the little things.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Last year, this is where Anderson REALLY blew it against the Bengals, basically throwing two picks for touchdowns.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Lining Cribbs up under center sounds like a better option than Anderson at thispoint
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 2:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Vikers, ol’ reliable
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yay! Braylon with a helpful penalty…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Looking like 1st or 2nd year Braylon this year.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hines Ward gets away with that one.
by Estonianzulu on Sep 28, 2008 2:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Even the announcer knew that that route was about to be jumped.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ok. its really Quinn time now. Next series.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
DA’s making Ndukwe a friggin star
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We are so effing one dimensional right now
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 2:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thank god for forward progress (i use the word “progress” loosely)
by jill29 on Sep 28, 2008 2:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How many runs for no gain can we have?
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 2:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, Lewis is having a good game.
And so is our defense. Other than that, we suck.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A lot, when the Bengals crowd the line and you can’t take advantage of the huge holes in their pass defense.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
if this offense was a horse, they’d have shot it by now
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 2:52 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Penalties and going backwards
Might as well start Quinn or do something
by orangemocha on Sep 28, 2008 2:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think the run to Jason Wright signaled that Anderson was done, possibly. “Cut our losses on this drive and start over next drive.”
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Edwards and DA fighting on the sideline, and Lewis apparently breaks it up. It doesn’t look as if Quinn is warming up or anything.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
At least someone is showing some fire. Lets see it on the field now.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most emotion this team has shown this year….Our coach could watch a murder happen and still not show emotion
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
don’t act like that’s the #1 requisite for a coach. Belli-cheat doesn’t show emotion either.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But he wears a sweatshirt…making him sweet
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh my god…STOP LINING UP OFFSIDES Leonard…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Leonard has got in 4 plays and lined up offsides 2 of them.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 2:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Makes you wonder why Rubin isn’t playing more. Or is he? I am not watching.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our corners are playing pretty well today.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 2:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Give Leanard a break, he’s trying to keep our offense off the field to give us a chance for a pick 6.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bang, NICE READ by D’Qwell Jackson. Come on everyone, if our offense can’t get fired up then let’s do it for them. COME ON BROWNS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Done.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Done.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ask and ye shall recieve
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our defense is gaining more yardage than our offense. lol
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 2:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think I know why Quinn isn’t playing yet…Crennel’s thought process is that he’s been watching Anderson and taking notes on how a pro bowl quarterback plays therefore he thinks that if Quinn goes in he’ll just do what Anderson is doing anyway…
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Here comes………….Anderson! Let’s go offense!
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I really don’t understand this, do they have such a bad view of Quinn that they think he can do worse?
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It probably has more to do with Romeo being loyal. A little too loyal.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
C’mon, Cribbs
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Anderson is killin my fansy team. Im a ravens fan but i wish the offense would pick it up
FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Benji5203 on Sep 28, 2008 3:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
unless you’re in a 25-team league, should you really be starting DA?
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
eli is my starter and anderson is my back-up. Eli is on bye
FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Benji5203 on Sep 28, 2008 3:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Eric Zeier would look good back in a Browns uni right now
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Testaverde’s always available
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hell Spurgen Wynn looks like Peyton Manning right now
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let’s go hurry-up already. Change the pace.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the guy ray lewis laid out last week
FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Benji5203 on Sep 28, 2008 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Go away. Why are you even here? We don’t play you for a long ass time. Go to the Steelers website.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He’s a soldier we dress up in uniform….it’s kind of like olympians and home depot
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
good. he is on my Fansty team also
FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Benji5203 on Sep 28, 2008 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no one cares about your fantasy team
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shaffer out? Please don’t tell me Sowells is coming in. Dear god…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Probably a place we should look to spend a late draft pick. Donnovan just laughed and said he would roll left this play.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is just a laughable football game all-around.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
They may ban pro football in OH after this one.
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sum1 give me an update
FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Benji5203 on Sep 28, 2008 3:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
what yard line?
FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Benji5203 on Sep 28, 2008 3:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
2nd & 7 on Cleveland 40 according to my yahoo tracker…
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thax
FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Benji5203 on Sep 28, 2008 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
running behind Joe Thomas: usually a good idea. Especially in space.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t care how we do it, 7 points can probably win this game.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How can we not have ANY frickin plays be hit in stride this year. It’s all sitting down in coverage.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
people know that forcing DA to throw in to zone coverage is to their advantage?
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sheesh…what luck on the encroachment.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
what was the name of that lady doctor on that TV show in the 90s?
oh, yeah. Quinn.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
WOOOO!!! Nice run by Anderson. Come on, let’s go! Build some confidence here.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Is it bad I was hoping to see Anderson get lit up right there?
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
probably
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Historically, this is where J Lewis breaks one.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
OH MY GOD A COMPLETION IN STRIDE! WE’RE BACK! ;)
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
we can wait if you need to change your shorts
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Back in business.
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://nbaokc.blogspot.com/
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on Sep 28, 2008 3:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Shaffer head injury, return questionable
by exposition on Sep 28, 2008 3:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Um, did someone remind Anderson how to play quarterback?
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey, we reached the Heinz red zone.
throwing to Winslow = good
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
C.H.U.D. and Crennel may weigh in, too.
Thanks goodness for the break at the end of the quarter.
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok Anderson, whatever you do here, don’t throw an INT!
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Here we go, Brownies, here we go…if Anderson scores a touchdown on this drive, he has saved his job for another week/two perhaps…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Because of 1 TD against a terrible defense?
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trying to think through Crennel’s mind.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As demented as it is….Distorted view of reality
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Luckily, I was betting all my rent money a first-down rush.
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice one-handed stab by Lewis on the screen…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice job, Anderson. That’s the throw we wanted earlier to Heiden.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Haha, the Bengals just used their final timeout. Touchdown is even more valuable here now.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Lewis adhering to the Romeo Crennel School of Clock Management
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To much time in the film room….Romeo rubbed off on the Bungles
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
glad to see another team struggle with clock management for a change
by jill29 on Sep 28, 2008 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Vickers continues to be old faithful
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He was an unsung hero last season, he’s back to his old tricks
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since I had to start Lewis on my fantasy squad, give the ball to Lewis 3 times!
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I hate that stupid new rule…defenders can push anyone out.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i didn’t know about the rule…i was screaming that he was pushed….aw well…
by jill29 on Sep 28, 2008 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DAMMIT
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
BANG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That deserved the subject line.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
TOUCHDOWN
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Damn, that was sweet. Braylon got some stickum during the TO
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Let’s get PUMPED.
For the first time this season, the defense will be put to the test where it matters most: a small lead in the fourth quarter after holding them all game.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
DA’s QB rating following touchdown pass is probably hovering around 60 now…nice
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Woohooo, Aaron Rogers for the big TD pass, oops, had a fantasy ouburst. My bad… lol
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
hey, you might want to check out fantasyfootballblog.net for all your fantasy comment needs
by jill29 on Sep 28, 2008 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crazy game in New York:
Jets up 34-0 at halftime.
Score now 34-21 with time left in quarter three.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and Kurt Warner shall lead them
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am loving my pickup of the Cards D this week! Negative points here we come!
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There we go Dawson — touchback.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Warner isn’t human. He’s a terminator sent back in time to take make sure the machines take over.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
His first half wouldn’t make you think that.
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
FUMBLE! BROWNS FOOTBALL! WOOOOOOOOOO!!!
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mike Adams, I no longer think we should cut you.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He sucked hard initially, but he’s really stepped up these last two weeks
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
FUMBLE!! WE GOT IT
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
There’s the hot throw to Winslow. COME ON OFFENSE! MAKE US PROUD AGAIN!
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ok, my fantasy team is surging. Need a Lewis TD now to finish off my opposition. :-)
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Finally throwing the ball down field
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jesus…stop the heart attack attempts.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
did someone give DA a shot of something during the half?
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Edwards should push him around a bit more
by jill29 on Sep 28, 2008 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
uh oh
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
whew. that was close
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I like the hustle by DA.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
New pregame ritual. Just before kickoff BE walks up to DA and punches him in the chest.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
haha, maybe he can knock Crennel around a little too!
by jill29 on Sep 28, 2008 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NICE. I like this half
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
First touchdown for Edwards.
First touchdown for Lewis.
Fourth quarter against the Bengals — the day our offense came back to life.
We can only hope.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Every season needs a turning point
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just enough plays to save his job, DA owes Ryan Fitzpatrick a box of chocolates.
by Estonianzulu on Sep 28, 2008 3:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I am pondering how different this game would be with Palmer in
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it’s safe to say we would’ve been down at this point.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, my fantasy team locks up 5-0. Sadly, Rodgers just hurt his shoulder.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
+2. Over at LGT we have rules against this kind of thing,
"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"
by Gradysmanldy on Sep 28, 2008 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
did you see him zip the ball in there on Jennings 2nd td?
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it just me, or has the PLAYCALLING also seemed to finally change? A lot more calls DOWN THE FIELD or TOWARDS THE END ZONE as opposed to sitting in zone on a comebacker.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That’s what I said earlier….DA’s arm is built to go down field, something we haven’t done this year…
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I beleive what you said earlier was “put in Brady”.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I did….but since Romeo doesn’t have confidence in DA to go downfield he might as well put someone in who he is confident in
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Waited long enough. Also helped to remember Winslow was on the field
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I haven’t seen it, but I have been calling for last year’s playbook for a while.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe someone got in C.H.U.D.’s face, too?
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lets not overreact here. This is the single worst team (outside of maybe Houston) that we play this year. And it took us 4 quarters to move on them.
by Estonianzulu on Sep 28, 2008 3:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and they didn’t have their starting QB in
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, he would totally bolster their defense.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Time of Possession. Ever hear of it?
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn’t play defense, wouldn’t have had the ball when we made an 80 yard drive, ever hear of it?
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its also the first sign of life we have seen from our offense in a little under a year. Let us enjoy at least till the game is over.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh…don’t crash the only optimism we’ve had on offense all season.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
radio says Vickers got hit in the eye by a beer bottle thrown by a scumbag, probably unemployed Bengals fan
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Doug D let everyone on the airwaves know that we are too classy for that in Cleveland.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We have no room to talk on this particular subject.
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why did our D quit just when our O woke up?
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Inexperience, both on Mel Tucker’s part and some of the defenders.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We’re begging for a good zone play by a middle linebacker.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 3:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
we’re begging for a good … middle linebacker
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
great. To Ocho-Shitto, too
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ocho-Shitto….i don’t know whether to laugh or raise my eyebrow and ask you if you could have come up with something better
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ocho-Stinko seemed too tame
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t really consider laughing
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would love to see us NOT try to sit on this ball when we get it back keep the rhythm we had going.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Pressure back on Anderson….let’s see how this goes
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It would be sweet to have Harrison actually run a pass route from out there once in a while. We’ve set it up now.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I feel like Henry in Rookie of the Year , “Oh my God, Oh my God, Oh my God”
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
still not as dumb as actually lining up offsides.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
this penaty brought to you by Time Warner. seems appropriate
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Only need 1 first down and we can bring it all the way to the 2 minute warning….
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would be in Cover 3 zone or Cover 1 man, rushing 4 or 5 every time. Maybe a blitz rusing 6 in the right situation
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blitzing would be advisible
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most teams look for a way to win….The Cleveland Browns on the hand, look for a way to lose
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Their QB running and staying in bounds sounds OK to me here.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
C’mon D, its all up to you now
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My anoose is tighter than a snare drum right now.
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That’s lookin for a way to lose right there.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’re just out to get me today aren’t you
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pool with a good play
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Holy!!!!!!!!!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Alex Hall is awesome
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How are we sponsored by Heinz? Don’t they do pitt’s field? That should be illegal.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would love to see he and Wimbley coming off the same side in a blitz package.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wimbley has reappeared today. Promising developments for sure.
by exposition on Sep 28, 2008 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Houston Jacksonville goes to OT. Shaub puts up 3 TDs 300+ yards passing.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and I didnt start Kevin Walter. dammit.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I didnt start Shaub in facor of Aaron Rogers and Rogers got hurt in the 4th quarter. Cost me 30 pts. I still might win though.
by gentryholdem on Sep 28, 2008 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Houston looking respectable. Owen Daniels a great bye-week fill in at TE
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Browns are actually in the + turnover margin today….I guess THAT’S how you win games
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Giants are going to destroy us :(
by Estonianzulu on Sep 28, 2008 3:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
On national television none the less
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK Debbie Downer, lets try to enjoy the present
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
man, i’ve been following all game online, just assumed that this game wasn’t on tv… what the hell is two 0-3 ohio teams doing being on free tv in Chicago?
oh, and whatever happens this season, savage is still awesom. go hall.
by kwoog on Sep 28, 2008 3:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You boy McDonald is having a pretty good game.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
honestly, overall this D is much, much better, no?
by kwoog on Sep 28, 2008 3:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Than last year, yes. Today? EHhhhh I think against Pitt they played better. Mike Adams sounds like a real NFL player today, though. The whole secondary sounds like it’s played well. I am excited for Jones and Pool to be on the field at the same time.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Me too. I know you’re not watching, but that Hall sack was sweet, and he was fired up afterwards.
by kwoog on Sep 28, 2008 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
again, they’re going against a backup
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no just the Bengals are not very good
by orangemocha on Sep 28, 2008 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
see above…
remember, “much better would be league average.” we were 30 just last year.
by kwoog on Sep 28, 2008 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I mean the Eagles’ D was so much better on national TV…..
Allowing that O only 28 points when our offense didn’t hold the ball at all (see, here is a relevant case for TOP) seems like a victory.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, that was as “bad” as Dallas looked all year on offense.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Bengals did give the Giants a good game
so who can tell whats gonna happen?
by orangemocha on Sep 28, 2008 3:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Time to see if the Tribe can ruin the Sox season?
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How sweet it is
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 3:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
5 turnovers for Cincy…..yikes….Who Dey, Who Dey, Who Dey think they gonna beat this year?
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 3:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I doubt it. People will call for him, and probably be justified in doing so, but I can’t see RAC making the change.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno…..DA may have saved his job in Romeo’s mind
by Tribe_Hippie on Sep 28, 2008 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A W is a W, signs of life from the offense/playcalling, I will take it.
Still hoping we can get a look at Quinn sometime to see what he can do.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 4:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Short of running off 5 straight and getting back in this thing (Wash, Jax, Balt, Den, Buf, Hou), I think the best possible senario for this season is something like 7-9, 8-8, and DA doing enough to show he’s a Starting caliber QB, not Pro Bowl maybe, but not awful (85 rating at 25 years old or something).
That way maybe we can get a 2nd for him and the Quinn era starts after a loaded draft next spring.
by kwoog on Sep 28, 2008 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That sounds like the best case scenario right now. I wouldn’t be upset with hovering around .500 after the 4-12 and 6-10 seasons. It’s doable but will take more than one or two series from our “real” offense.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Woooo!!!!
That was possibly one of the most boring games ever. It reminded me of the SEC.
But it’s a win!!!!
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://nbaokc.blogspot.com/
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on Sep 28, 2008 4:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
WHO DEY? WE DEY!
Hell yes.
I still think Anderson sucks really bad. But right now, I’m just pumped up for our first win. Losing sucks and losing to the bungles is even worse. GO BROWNS.
Now, lets have a productive bye week, maybe make a QB change and head back towards respectability.
by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 28, 2008 4:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Those who know how to win are much more numerous than those who know how to make proper use of their victories.
Polybius, History
Greek historian (205 BC – 118 BC)
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, do we root for BAL or PIT tomorrow night?
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 4:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
15 torn ACLs
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think I could root for Pittsburgh if they were 2-13 and we need them to knock off another team to get into the playoffs.
by kwoog on Sep 28, 2008 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I respect Ozzie. Of course I hated Billick, and hate Lewis… but other than that, I don’t have any reasons to completely loathe them. I don’t consider the loss of our team to have anything to do w/ the current Baltimore Ravens.
by kwoog on Sep 28, 2008 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting question, as I discussed the same thing with some of my relatives yesterday.
I would much rather see Baltimore win, because I think eventually they’ll collapse due to their offensive ineptness. Meanwhile, the Steelers have too much experience to be a basement team. So, it’d be better for them to soak in a loss right now so that they don’t jump too far ahead of us in the standings. This goes along with the presumption that the Ravens will go on to finish a 6-10 or 7-9 team.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The way Baltimore D is playing, their may not be a collapse due to our offensive ineptness. All our offense has to do is not mess up and put a least 2 tds on the board. if we are able to get a small lead going into the 4th, our D will hold it or may even make it larger. You guys know all about that.(not starting any troble).
FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Benji5203 on Sep 28, 2008 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, it is very dangerous to just casually say “sure, let’s give the Ravens three division wins and expect them to just roll over and die!”
It doesn’t look like any of the AFC North teams are good enough to beat any of the NFC East teams though. Taking that into consideration, it’ll probably come down to how each of the AFC North teams do against each other the second time around.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 28, 2008 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Baltimore in a way such that Art Modell loses money.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Victory is sweet.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on Sep 28, 2008 4:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
after how this year has went
I will take an fugly win anytime
by orangemocha on Sep 28, 2008 4:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the bye week will help the offense get healthy and the Browns to be show up. glad to have a victory, this team would have fallen apart with a L b/c of lack of leadership. Nothing to be excited about though except for a bye
by Guage80 on Sep 28, 2008 4:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Returns of JJ, Stallworth, Rucker, possibly seeing Beau Bell, Ryan Tucker (did he play today?), possibly but doubtfully Sean Jones, getting Steinbach to 100%…those all seem to be things to be excited about to me.
by rufio on Sep 28, 2008 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tucker did not play. Sowells came in for Kevin Shaffer, who got a concussion in the 3rd. But Tucker should be available after the bye, or so it sounds.
by exposition on Sep 29, 2008 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here’s looking forward to not having to bring Sowells in to another game.
by rufio on Oct 1, 2008 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The training staff and Stallworth have two weeks to get him healed and on the field.
Joe J has to stay out for six games, right?
by JulioBernazard on Sep 28, 2008 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought it was six weeks, and then he has to practice within a week or something or be put on IR. Regardless, it is something to be excited about later on in the season.
by rufio on Sep 29, 2008 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I believe it’s something like this: they are eligible to return after Week 6. If they can’t return by Week 9 (or 10, not sure), then they get IR’ed.
Rucker could be back for the Giants game if he stayed on schedule.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by Chris Pokorny on Sep 29, 2008 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here are the rules, pulled from this article about LeCharles Bentley (SOB)
During the first six weeks of the regular season, players on Reserve/PUP are allowed to attend meetings and continue rehabilitation at the club facility, but are not eligible to practice with the club.
After the sixth week, the club has a three-week window (Weeks 7-9) to allow a player on Reserve/PUP to begin practicing with the club. Once the player begins practice, he can practice for three weeks before the club must make a decision as to his roster status.
At any point following the sixth week of the regular season through the expiration of the player’s three week practice window, the club can add the player to the 53-man roster or place the player on Reserve-Injured. Additionally, at the expiration of the practice window, the club can allow the player to remain on Reserve/PUP for the remainder of the season.
by NickFantana on Sep 30, 2008 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meant to add, having Rucker and Stallworth could be potentially huge. I would be really happy if that were the case and even happier if Rucker saw some playing time in contravention to Crennel’s not usually playing rookies strategy.
by NickFantana on Sep 30, 2008 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stallworth would be huge. He would completely change the way defenses are playing us. It would open Winslow up big time.
by gahnki on Sep 30, 2008 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I am an opposing team, I am still counting Braylon and Kellen as the #1 and #2 pass threats. Even with Stallworth. Not saying it’s not going to be great to have a legit NFL wideout besides Braylon, but the D might not leave Kellen to go cover Stallworth. I wouldn’t.
by rufio on Oct 1, 2008 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We clearly need offensive weapons right now, so I hope the fact the Rucker is a rookie won’t affect things his PT much, but it probably will. I am disappointed to hear we have to wait until after week 6.
Love Rucker’s versatility, and with him, Vickers, Harrison, Winslow, we have a good handful of offensive guys who are versatile. I would love to see them shift a lot to create mismatches and false reads.
by rufio on Oct 1, 2008 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















