Cleveland Browns vs. Cincinnati Bengals - Official Game Thread
Cleveland Browns @ Cincinnati Bengals
| CLEVELAND BROWNS (0-3) | WEEK 4 | CINCINNATI BENGALS (0-3) | |||
![]() |
VS. | ![]() |
|||
| Date: | September 28, 2008 | Location: | Cincinnati, OH |
| Time: | 1:00 p.m. ET |
Stadium: | Paul Brown Stadium |
| TV: | CBS |
Favorite: | Bengals by 3½ |
| Radio: | WMMS, 100.7 FM | Over/Under: | 44½ |
| SBN Coverage: | Cincy Jungle | Announcers |
Kevin Harlan, Rich Gannon |
The Battle of "O-Win-No" seems a little more appropriate, as the Cleveland Browns and the Cincinnati Bengals each enter this game with an 0-3 record. The Browns need to build some momentum heading into the bye week. This game literally means everything in the world to the futures of both Derek Anderson and Romeo Crennel. With a win, and I mean a good win, they will both last beyond the bye week. With a loss, we will be looking ahead to next season. The Bengals' problem is their defense -- if you can't stop anybody and your offense can't compete in a shootout anymore, then what chance do you have?
Can the Browns finally get their first victory of the season? Let's kick off the preview with the overall team statistics thus far...
OFFENSE
| Category | Browns | Bengals |
| Points Scored | 8.6 (32nd) | 13.3 (29th) |
| Passing | 122.7 (31st) | 152.0 (26th) |
| Rushing | 71.3 (30th) | 86.7 (25th) |
| Total Offense (yards) | 194.0 (32nd) | 238.7 (30th) |
DEFENSE
| Category | Browns | Bengals |
| Points Scored | 22.0 (18th) | 22.3 (20th) |
| Passing | 202.0 (18th) | 178.7 (12th) |
| Rushing | 145.0 (25th) | 174.3 (28th) |
| Total Defense (yards) | 347.0 (23rd) | 353.0 (24th) |
|
Quarterback
I was originally going to give the Bengals the edge here, but when I heard that Carson Palmer was ruled out due to injury, the edge goes back to Derek Anderson. Though he has not performed well over the first three weeks of the season, he has a lot more starting experience than Ryan Fitzpatrick does. Anderson's season is on the line here -- if he starts off the game with a hot hand, then he will live to see another day as a starter. If he throws interceptions or leads several three-and-outs in a row, then Brady Quinn will receive serious consideration from Romeo Crennel. |
|
Running Back
Neither the Browns nor the Bengals have gotten their ground games going -- each team is averaging less than 100 yards per game. In Lewis' case though, it seems to have more to do with the Browns falling behind and abandoning the run than it does Lewis having a sub par season. Reports have indicated that the Browns are committed to focusing their entire gameplan around Lewis this week, especially after his outcry for more touches following last week's game. Crennel also stated for the second consecutive week that they will try to give Jerome Harrison a few more touches. Let's see if he's actually true to his word this week. |
|
Receiver
Right now, Braylon Edwards is struggling more than any receiver in football besides Chad Johnson. When you cancel both of those players out of the equation, it boils down to T.J. Houshmandzadeh against Syndric Steptoe. I think I'd take Houshmandzadeh any day of the week in that contest. The Browns still have Kellen Winslow at their disposal, but Anderson's chemistry with him hasn't been very high. The Bengals have had more support from Antonio Chatman on their depth chart to give them the slight edge heading into the game. Overall, the Browns still have the better talent. |
|
Offensive Line
Eric Steinbach, after originally being reported as having an injury that would keep him out 3-5 weeks, is ACTIVE for today's game against the Bengals. That means the Browns' line should be completely healthy, and thank goodness -- Seth McKinney was horrible last week and also affected the play of Joe Thomas. The Bengals haven't had a dominant offensive line the past several years, something that has corresponded to the struggles of Carson Palmer. |
|
Defensive Line With the Bengals struggling to get their running game going and an inexperience quarterback under center, this is a perfect opportunity for Shaun Rogers to put the heat on. Remember, we originally thought that the Cincinnati Bengals had acquired Rogers in the offseason, but then the deal was void and we ended up getting him instead. The Bengals only have one sack through three games, so trying to win the battle in the trenches shouldn't be much of a threat. |
|
Linebacker
The Browns don't have playmakers at linebacker. On the other side of the field though, the Bengals don't even have guys that can tackle. Just take a look at their Week 1 matchup against the Baltimore Ravens, when they allowed Joe Flacco to run down the field for a 33 yard touchdown. Lewis could be in for a big day -- recall last season that he ran for over 200 yards against them in Week 2. |
|
Secondary
Though the defensive backs were a big concern heading into the season, Brandon McDonald and Eric Wright have definitely held their own. The Bengals have yet to record a single interception this season and are not known as having a shutdown secondary. |
|
Special Teams
Could this be the week that Joshua Cribbs makes the impact we've been looking for? If it's a high-scoring affair, then he'll get a lot of looks. Phil Dawson has been perfect this season, but he has not had any meaningful attempts yet. Hopefully he'll be able to make more of an impact on the game this week. |
FINAL PREDICTION: Cleveland Browns 24, Cincinnati Bengals 9.
If Carson Palmer was playing, I was thinking of picking the Bengals to defeat the Browns. With Ryan Fitzpatrick under center, things aren't going to be good for the Bengals. They struggled to move the ball the first two weeks due to awful schemes and playcalling -- only Palmer's abilities were able to bail him out of that. Unless Anderson single-handedly loses this game again, we shouldn't have any problems taking care of the Bengals. Tough to say when you're 0-3 though, eh?
This is the official gameday topic for the Cleveland Browns in Week 4 as they face off against the Cincinnati Bengals. All comments regarding the game should be posted in this topic. Enjoy the game, and GO BROWNS!!!
0 recs |
606 comments
Comments
No Palmer sounds good to me. No excuses for not winning this one.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 12:59 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Is Ian Eagle doing this game? I hope so.
Him and Solomon Wilcots are my favourite broadcast team.
Aw, it’s not. :-(
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://nbaokc.blogspot.com/
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on
Sep 28, 2008 1:03 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
i wonder what size shoes Fitzpatrick wears…Madden would tell me
by jill29 on
Sep 28, 2008 1:04 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Say it with me now. No third and longs
by DisplacedBuckeye on
Sep 28, 2008 1:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
LOL
The announcer seems dead set on telling us how much both of the teams suck.
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://nbaokc.blogspot.com/
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on
Sep 28, 2008 1:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey, we got a first down! wooo!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:07 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Nice Jamal. Andre (K?)nott said we would be looking for “balance” this week on O. I took that to mean we would run the whole game.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:07 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
whatever works
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jason Wright sighting
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:09 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Good to see(well, hear) Heiden out there
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:09 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
OMG
Stop with the running plays! What’s wrong with a short pass?
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://nbaokc.blogspot.com/
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on
Sep 28, 2008 1:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
AH, settling for the 3. How Romeo.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Do you think Romeo does anything when we have the ball? Besides hope we do well?
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:11 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think he uses the time to sneak cookies
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought a PA was called for there on second down.
by DisplacedBuckeye on
Sep 28, 2008 1:11 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
No one would have been expecting it on 3rd.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
radio
Listening on Sirius, it’s amazing how many commercials/sponsors they make Donovan interject into every single thing that happens.
by exposition on
Sep 28, 2008 1:12 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
this message sponsered by Old Spice.
by DisplacedBuckeye on
Sep 28, 2008 1:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thats what I like about this NFL.com radio thing, no commercials
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
except when Donnovan has to say “that’s another first down brought to you by Safe Auto…”
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That’s why we have the Heinz Red Zone and the Safe Auto Minimum Coverage and the Time Warner Official’s Call and so on during the game.
by exposition on
Sep 28, 2008 1:15 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m hoping for the “1000 Flushes Crappy Play of the Day”
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
“hey, and that’s a Papajohns.com first down!”
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How many straight runs this drive?
by DisplacedBuckeye on
Sep 28, 2008 1:18 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey at least at this rate Jamal will have 1800 yards this season.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:19 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
3
2nd & 3rd down, followed by a 1st down run
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:19 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Back now…liked the movement we got on the ball with Lewis on drive one. Next drive, it’s time to test what Anderson can bring to the table today.
The Bengals do not look good on offense right now. Way too tentative.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:19 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
New QB can cause that kind of thing
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bengals were tentative the first two weeks of the season with Palmer.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ugh…why Harrison, why!
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:21 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Hahaha, penalty keeps our first down.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Harrison! dammit!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:21 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Miami’s direct snaps work.
Jacksonville’s direct snaps work.
Browns’ direct snap fails.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:23 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I don’t know how anyone’s work. I wouldn’t believe that anyone other than maybe LT was actually going to throw the ball.
And Randle El.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And what I mean by that is we need to completely take DA out of the game and at least give the threat of one other thing: read-option, roll out pass option, something, it’s pretty clear we are going to run the ball there.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Trick play for Cribbs. too bad it didn’t work like, at all
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:23 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Steptoe with a tight catch? Still, against the Bengals’ defense, how in the world can the coverage be that tight? Get open!
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:23 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
“Steptoe caught it”. Hmm, odd phrase
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:23 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
did you see how he starred him down the whole way? Steptoe #1 option?
by Guage80 on
Sep 28, 2008 1:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bang! At least Crennel has been a little more true to Harrison this week.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:25 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
and then Cribbs taketh away
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Andre talking about the lack of 20+yd plays in the offense
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:25 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
sounded like a sweet block by good ol’ Vickers
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:25 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah sounded that way here too haha.
Those are the types of guys we need to step up to make our offense legit while Stallworth/JJ/Rucker?/etc are out.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Can we get a change of announcers? Harlan and Gannon are way too monotone for football action…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:26 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Chini-doom. Good name for a D-lineman
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:26 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Seriously, we need to take a shot deep to Braylon. None of these guys could cover him last year, so at worst, he will drop it.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:27 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Man, we’re having some trouble with those elite Bengal CBs
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:27 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Nice punt
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:28 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Phil Dawson: MVP
Phil Dawson: Browns Hall of Famer?
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 1:29 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Oh yeah.. Derek Anderson still stinks.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 1:29 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
he should try Old Spice Double Action. its two things
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
On the pass to Winslow, it could’ve been a little more to the outside. But, I think Winslow could’ve done a better job shielding his body to an undersized, young cornerback in Leon Hall.
The next pass…looked ugly, but the CBS crew do a bad job of truly showing what the “confusion” from Steve Sanders was. I certainly wouldn’t bench Anderson just yet.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:30 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
or it could have lead Winslow, just a bit. It was about 15 yards short of where it should have been thrown.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 1:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
on the radio they said Sanders was saying he was held by a LB.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think this is wrong. Edwards and Sanders were talking/yelling at eachother about routes.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 1:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can’t see a thing, I can only listen to Doug Diken. (sp?)
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Two screen plays, including the one Harrison missed where DA’s fault as was the Winslow pass throughing it short. If your bar is DA not throwing INTs then he will never be benched. Luckily for you that’s Romeo’s bar too…
by Guage80 on
Sep 28, 2008 1:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Your bar was not to play Anderson at all.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would love a shutout today. I would settle for under 10 points and 1 KW sack.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:32 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow! What a play by Brandon McDonald…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:32 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
sounds like he is having a good game so far.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
WOO! big hit by McD!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:32 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
How do you give any quarterback that open of a middle to run on any down?
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:34 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
if he tries that again I hope we can hit him a little harder
by cleveland teamer on
Sep 28, 2008 1:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah…bad move on his part, especially with a lack of depth already at QB.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jeez….credit to the QB on those two plays, I guess.
by cleveland teamer on
Sep 28, 2008 1:34 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Quinn commercial… hopefully EAS got a discount until he starts like the Browns did.
by Guage80 on
Sep 28, 2008 1:35 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I know we want to “crowd” the line of scrimmage, but we have been offsides way too much the past 2 weeks.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:37 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
lining up in the neutral zone is just plain lazy.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 1:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
lack of discipline, which is caused by…shitty coaching
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Two offsides so early against a quarterback like Fitzpatrick? Stop doing the guy favors…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:37 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Can’t believe we’re allowing this O to drive on us.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:38 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ridiculously poor containment on third downs by the Browns. Keep a defensive lineman plugging the middle.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:39 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Or someone in a short zone to watch him and catch him before he runs so far.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
do we have middle linebackers on our team?
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Oh, sweet Jesus.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The only reason the Bengals are moving the ball is Fitzpatricks running.
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://nbaokc.blogspot.com/
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on
Sep 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Which we can't seem to stop
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would love to see him throw more…because that would probably mean some picks for us.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Looks like the O will need to step up and score today.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
don’t worry, we have another 3-7 points to score today.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 1:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LOL
and I thought I was negative. Funny though
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:42 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I am thinking the defense can score that much for us.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:43 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
two words I'm dying to hear
pick…six
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There we go — bring some pressure up the middle on third down.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:43 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I like hearing that we blitzed and the QB didn’t run for 15+ yards.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:43 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Least we kept them out of the end zone
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:43 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I expect a true playaction deep pass about 3-4 plays into this next drive.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:47 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I pray for one
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
DA heading for a solid first half, 2/5 for 13 yds…
by Guage80 on
Sep 28, 2008 1:48 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
we don’t have a passing game with DA in…
by Guage80 on
Sep 28, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I guess that’d fall on Chud.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LOL… you are right around the problem but like Romeo seem to miss it
by Guage80 on
Sep 28, 2008 1:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We get it…you’re hoping Quinn gets in. It still doesn’t excuse some of the playcalling.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah the fact that we haven’t gone PA yet is pretty ridiculous. And the Bengals are shifting more than we are, which was a trademark of our offense last year. No unbalanced line….way too vanilla.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:54 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Anderson has one of the least convincing PA’s I’ve seen. I actually think the first down play was PA.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 1:55 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Bengals are packing the line — have to make them respect the pass now.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:50 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Jason Wright should’ve picked Ndukwe up as opposed to helping out the center/left guard area.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, Wriight blew the assignment
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But he’s been hurting us all game….and he is not that good of a player.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We’re also making Fitzpatrick look good
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:54 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
there was 2 blitzers coming untouched. Wright picked the first one.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 1:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The first blitzer was picked up by Steinbach.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:54 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jesus Christ on a cracker
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
In my best Barack Obama impression:
“Folks, lets be clear. Derek Anderson is not an NFL QB.”
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 1:52 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
PICK!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
you could have made that play though- thrown right to him and no traffic.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I am just surprised he can actually do something worthwhile i.e. catch the ball.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
maybe we should make him a WR
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Mike Adams shows up for work
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe he was just baiting QBs through the first 2 games to throw his way, and now he is capitalizing.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
For a backup, I thought he has filled in better-than-expected overall.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The games I actually saw, he was always the one making the tackle after he let the opposing receiver get wide open to catch the ball. Now that I can’t see it he gets 2 picks. I should just stick to the radio.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pick by Adams! Not great field position though after an illegal block in the back :-/
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
better than a kick in the nuts
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would probably take one to the balls to negate a key Browns penalty.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 1:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Harlan: “…but the defense fights through.”
Really? Harrison had a pretty big gain there.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:00 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
REVERSE
with Harrison, no less. It worked and everything
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:00 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
3 TE set! could be interestin
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:02 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I like it. Heiden and Dinkins are worth more than Steptoe and Cribbs the WR.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 2:03 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Anderson’s pass to Lewis — one of his best plays this season.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:03 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I like his accuracy on the 4-foot pass. Would like to see that on a 15-yarder.
by cleveland teamer on
Sep 28, 2008 2:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Getting a lot more use out of Harrison and Wright today
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:04 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Come on, Harrison…find the marker first!
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:05 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
GO FOR IT
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:05 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not liking 1 for 5 on 3rd down. Liking the decision to go for it.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:05 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I count 5 plays to Harrison so far: 2 runs, the reverse, 2 pass targets.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 2:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
He was also in as a decoy when we did something to Lewis. Are you counting his drop?
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
DAMMIT TO FUCKING HELL
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ugh…that one hurts.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Gannon: “Derek Anderson too good of a player”
WRONG, that is as good a player as Derek Anderson has ever been.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 2:07 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Fitzpatrick has been so bad today…it will be a crime if we lose this game.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:07 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Was expecting Lewis to plow into the line. Dammit, he was WIDE OPEN
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:07 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
PICK!
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I wash my hands of Anderson, thank god we are playing Ryan Fitzpatrick…
Never mind, good job Eric Wright :S
by Estonianzulu on
Sep 28, 2008 2:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Clearly when your running game is clicking on all cylinders and your QB is sucking up the stadium, it’s time to throw on 4th and 1.
by gentryholdem on
Sep 28, 2008 2:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
oh, you’ve got to be kidding me.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Interception City.
And then the fumble. What a comedy of errors this game is.
Tony.psd = Da Man
http://nbaokc.blogspot.com/
Check Out My New Blog! (Don't Worry, The Warriors are Still #1)
by Zorgon on
Sep 28, 2008 2:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
This is ridiculous…heck of a pick by Eric Wright, but then he loses it…
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:09 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Nooooooooooooooooooooo!
I know how men in exile feed on dreams of hope. (Aeschylus, Agamemnon)
by portland, oregon on
Sep 28, 2008 2:09 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ryan Fitzpatrick is better than Derek Anderson.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 2:09 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Can we get a do-over on training camp? Mulligan!
by gentryholdem on
Sep 28, 2008 2:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
this game is bad for my blood pressure.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Admittedly, I would not be upset if we came out the 2nd half with Quinn.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
anyone who would be upset needs help.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 2:11 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hell, at this point they could come out with Todd Philcox and I’d live with it
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:11 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wouldn’t be surprised if we see Quinn in the second half now. I still have my share of faith for Anderson, but we can’t go much further without doing something to jump start things.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m still not sure why you have the faith coming into this game, but how can you have watched this half and still think he is a NFL starter????
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 2:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Because I still remember the potential Derek Anderson showed when he was at his best, and I refuse to believe he’s fully at his best right now.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
His best? When he was completing 55% with lots of TDs and INTs getting lucky with an aweseom receiving core against bad teams???
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 2:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Boy, I thought our game’s score was a boring first half…then you look around at the rest of the scores and see much of the same.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:11 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah Denver isn’t helping my fantasy status as much as they usually do.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:12 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I like Pool on the blitz. I would send him and S.Jones at the QB a lot if they were both healthy.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Eric Wright
Anyone who saw it, was that fumble as flukey as it sounded? Or did Wright screw up?
by exposition on
Sep 28, 2008 2:14 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
eh- he was a little loose with the ball and their RB put his helmet on the ball.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 2:15 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Alex Hall continues to be a bright spot
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:14 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Phil Savage is the worst GM ever. He can’t ever find talent in the late rounds! We should fire him with Romeo. The Browns suck and have sucked forever and will suck forever meeehhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
p.s. I am not mocking you, but I am mocking.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I assumed.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wonder what they are going to show for the highlights for this game
by orangemocha on
Sep 28, 2008 2:15 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Hopefully Brady Quinn in the 2nd half?
by gentryholdem on
Sep 28, 2008 2:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hopefully Jerome Harrison getting a dumpoff and weaving 60+ yards for a TD
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think that Wright INT play sums it up pretty nicely.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 2:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
BTW, is it just me or has Ocho Cinco lost a step?
by gentryholdem on
Sep 28, 2008 2:17 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
WTF is wrong with Romeo? stopped them on 3rd down, two timeouts, why didn’t we throw a timeout to get the ball back with well over 50 seconds left…
by Estonianzulu on
Sep 28, 2008 2:17 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Trying to get into halftime so he can get a snack.
by gentryholdem on
Sep 28, 2008 2:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah WTF a timeout would have given us a few chances.
by vegasbrown on
Sep 28, 2008 2:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, I think we all know Romeo sucks at clock management.
by kjc on
Sep 28, 2008 2:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
he still thinks those first half TOs rollover
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Can we get a Hail Mary attempt here?
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:20 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
what was the over under for this game
by orangemocha on
Sep 28, 2008 2:20 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Check in the game preview at the top.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That was a pretty dumb call by Marvin Lewis.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:21 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Definitely.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Against a real team, maybe. Against us, it worked just fine.
by Estonianzulu on
Sep 28, 2008 2:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It’s still a crazy-dumb call. Even if we have a worse chance of scoring than the average team. Our chances from, say, our own 35 are way worse than our chances from wherever we ended up. Just because it worked doesn’t mean it was smart. Shanahan was a moron going for 2 in the DEN/SD game too.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jamal Lewis is our leading receiver… Thats not good.
by kjc on
Sep 28, 2008 2:23 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Quick Poll: Who will be the Starting QB in the 2nd Half, Who Should be?
by Guage80 on
Sep 28, 2008 2:26 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, I’ll go with saying they give Anderson the reigns since we get the ball first. If he can’t produce a score, he’s out.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You know, I knew this team wouldn’t be as good this year as last. I was prepared for a step back. But this complete regression is insane.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:27 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I expected a step back W-L wise, but we don’t even look like the same team.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the worst part is- the defense has played relatively well in each game.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 2:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Run defense is a vast improvement.
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Uggg, once again the only think i feel like I have to look forward to is next years draft. Of course, we’ll pass on Beanie and he’ll become the next Jim Brown.
by gentryholdem on
Sep 28, 2008 2:32 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I honestly don’t know if he is coming out this year. He will have plenty of injury concerns, he wants a Heisman, he has said he is staying all 4 years…
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not to take anything off Anderson, but Harrison’s failed first down (leading to Anderson’s bad throw to Heiden on fourth down) was a big play.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:34 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I was one of the biggest Anderson backers going into this year, but the simple fact is there just isn’t any spark there. He just doesn’t look right to me. Something is wrong and for the most part he hasn’t looked right since losing to Cincinnati last year.
by gentryholdem on
Sep 28, 2008 2:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He also had a drop.
But he has bailed us out plenty of times, and a QB rating in the 40s is absolutely terrible.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sweet…a nice return by Cribbs finally.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:35 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Good start so far
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:36 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Upon my slow motion review, it looks like a clear catch by Steptoe. Unless there is a hidden juggle — then all bets are off.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:37 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
If the Browns do not score on this drive do they go to Quinn?
by Tribe_Hippie on
Sep 28, 2008 2:38 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
If it’s Anderson’s direct fault, probably. But if someone drops a pass or something wacky, probably not.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We will be just productive enough to keep Quinn on the bench
by Estonianzulu on
Sep 28, 2008 2:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
…yay?
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Shaffer blew that one I think.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:41 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Quinn
Nothing they’ve done or said seems to indicate they’d change QBs in the middle of a game barring an injury. I think Romeo’s just too stubborn.
by exposition on
Sep 28, 2008 2:41 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
DA’s really begging for it though
by cleveland teamer on
Sep 28, 2008 2:42 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think Anderson should not have started, but I"m calling you out on this one. He is one of the few NFL coaches that have benched a healthy QB in the middle of the game… last year, game one, nonetheles.
by DaytonDogg on
Sep 28, 2008 2:43 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, there’s the play where Anderson was at fault. Let’s see if Quinn starts warming up.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:42 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Straw that broke the camel’s back?
by Tribe_Hippie on
Sep 28, 2008 2:43 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
God help us.
bring in Brady “The Mighty” Quinn
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:42 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Time to show D.A. the bench. There’s no reason not to.
by JulioBernazard on
Sep 28, 2008 2:42 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
2 TD’s and 6 INT’s ……solid numbers by a pro bowl qb
by Tribe_Hippie on
Sep 28, 2008 2:43 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Seriously, I don’t care who is playing but whoever is on the field has to do a better job than this.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:43 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
5 of 12 for 44 yards and an interception….. Mike & Mike is gonna be funny tomorrow talking about Quinn.
by gentryholdem on
Sep 28, 2008 2:44 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Is Quinn warming up on the sideline? Don’t have direct TV… live in Florida.
by gentryholdem on
Sep 28, 2008 2:45 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
And now Fitzpatrick is driving on our defense, we are making him look like friggin Tom Brady. With the first overall pick in the NFL Draft, the Cleveland Browns select…
by Estonianzulu on
Sep 28, 2008 2:45 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Please, the Lions are so excited about drafting 1st overall without Millen at the helm, nothing will stop them from losing every game.
by rufio on
Sep 28, 2008 2:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Come on, now…it wasn’t that bad. We’ve forced a punt now.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Looks like Derek Anderson is coming back out.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:46 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep…let’s see what he can do from the 2-yard line.
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I smell 3 and out or a pick six.
by Estonianzulu on
Sep 28, 2008 2:47 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A safety didn’t cross your mind?
Dawgs By Nature - Find out why Pittsburgh still sucks.
by ChrisPokorny on
Sep 28, 2008 2:47 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah, I'm thinking safety
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
by BringBackKosar on
Sep 28, 2008 2:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs




