2009 NFL Draft talk
I know that gahnki had the idea of starting a draft FanPost for the draft so here it is.

We now know that the Browns have the number four five pick in the 2009 NFL Draft. Last year the Chiefs drafted Glen Dorsey and then signed him to a 5 year 50 million dollar deal with 22 million guaranteed. So that is our starting point contract-wise if we keep the pick. (Sorry for the mistake).
Also we have 2nd round pick, 4th round pick, and a 6th round pick.
We are missing;
3rd round pick traded to the Cowboys (Martin Rucker)
5th round pick that was traded for a 2008 sixth rounder (Paul Hubbard)
7th rounder that was traded to Miami for Travis Daniels.
So, it is going to be interesting to see how our new GM acquires some more picks. Be it a trade down or trading players, it will have to be done.
So if you have a link about a player coming out of school early that the Browns may have intrest in put it in here so we can all keep track of it. Or if you have a thought about a player that you see in a bowl game dump it in here. I will get it started. Rey Mauluaga is wildly overrated and should be avoided at all costs.
4 recs |
194 comments
Comments
3, 5 and a 7 given up for players to barely saw the field, jeez wonder why Phil is no longer employed.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Jan 3, 2009 11:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Savage doesn’t determine who plays, that’s Crennel’s fault. There was no reason not to play Rucker and Bell the last two months of the season.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 4, 2009 10:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Except when it is the starting QB.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Jan 4, 2009 4:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
it’s not really fair to say there was “no reason” not to play Rucker and Bell. they may not be better than the people who did play…that would be a very justifiable reason not to play them. we obviously have no idea how they practiced, etc., so it’s hard for us to say who’s at fault for their lack of PT…savage for overestimating their worth, or romeo for not playing guys w/ talent.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 8, 2009 6:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Need someone that can catch not cry
Can we get a reciver?
by sickofsucking on Jan 16, 2009 9:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought you guys had the fifth pick?
You guys tied with seattle. How do those tiebreakers go?
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on Jan 4, 2009 12:20 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Browns do have the fifth pick.
As for the pick, I simply don’t know enough at this point. Offense or defense doesn’t matter to me.
by Fundamentals on Jan 4, 2009 8:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Browns have the fifth pick, and they should take the best player available regardless of whether he plays offense or defense. We have huge needs in both areas.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 4, 2009 10:20 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, with the caveat of eliminating QBs from discussion. As much as I’d like to avoid the type of contract a player like Crabtree will require, even a WR would have a clear path to a starter’s spot on the 2009 Browns. Probably a moot point with him though. I am glad, however, that the other players being discussed at that level of the draft are largely defensive. That’ll help from two standpoints: finally finding a defensive playmaker (hopefully) and a slightly smaller contract.
by danvail on Jan 4, 2009 1:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If Crabtree is there, we should get him or entertain very serious offers (2 1sts, a 1st, 2nd, 3rd/4th).
Contracts should not matter. Several big dollar guys will retire/no longer be on the team, we can get rid of DA’s big cap number, we are under the cap now, the cap number just went up (as it does/will every year until the CBA runs out), and we need impact players.
Just get talent. We can always get cap room, we can’t always get talent.
As for O/D, get the best available with out QBs. I might take OTs out of the equation too because we only need a RT (arguably—Shaffer had a terrible season but also probably the worst of his career and we also have Tucker if he can come back). Just get impact players.
by rufio on Jan 4, 2009 2:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m only worried about contracts in the sense that it limits how much talent we can add defensively. Our money is already skewed towards the offense, and not being able to sign a high dollar defensive FA, etc. is limiting.
All in all, it’s a minor concern. Getting a guy that can step on the field and make a difference, that’s what the only real priority is. Crabtree is probably one of those guys.
by danvail on Jan 4, 2009 3:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, but I’d rather skip on another Braylon Edwards…. Crabtree drops alot of balls.
IF the new GM sticks with a 3-4 how can the Browns NOT take the best LB or tweener?
Brian Orakpo, Aaron Curry and possibly even Ray Maualuga would be better than Crabtree.
by AaronD on Jan 4, 2009 2:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well, it’s a question of talent. Would you rather have Brian Bosworth or Larry Fitzgerald?
by danvail on Jan 4, 2009 3:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure what that means, but if whoever we have evaluating talent sees Crabtree as the best talent, then he should pick Crabtree.
We can speculate with Mel Kiper all we want, but in the end it’s up to our GM to listen to his professional scouts to find the best talent available. If he feels like the defensive guys are Bart Scott caliber but Crabtree is Randy Moss caliber, then he’s going to pick Crabtree and he’d be right to do so.
That said, all things (including talent level) being equal, I’d rather take a LB than a WR.
by danvail on Jan 4, 2009 6:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
all things equal, i’d hope we focus on the front 7. both b/c of our needs, and looking at the evidence. granted individual players are each unique, but if you look at draft histories, offensive and defensive linemen and linebackers seem to “hit” at a much higher rate in the top 10 than do “skill position” players (a term i hate, but will use for the sake of clarity)
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 8, 2009 6:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It probably is “safer” to pick a front 7 guy. I’d love to see a study done on this, like 1998-2003 drafts or so. Modern, with enough time to judge players.
by danvail on Jan 9, 2009 11:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know if I would call it a “study” but here it goes; I consider a “hit” to be a Pro Bowl player. A good pick is a servicable NFL player for some time, a notch above OK. Bust is anyone else. I think that a team picking in the top ten need HITS. If you don’t it can weigh down your squad with bad players and bad contracts.
1998;
Hit;
1. Peyton Manning
4. Charles Woodson
8. Greg Ellis
9. Fred Taylor
11. Tra Thomas
12. Keith Brooking
13. Takeo Spikes
21. Randy Moss
26. Alan Faneca
Good;
6. Grant Winstrom
7. Kyle Turley
10. Duane Starks
18. Robert Edwards
19. Vonnie Holliday
28. R.W McQuarters
Front 7 taken in first round; 9. Hits; 3 (Only Greg Ellis in first ten picks.) Solid players; 2. Busts; 4 (I debated on putting Brian Simmons in here because he had a couple of good years, but he was just ok. Same with Anthony Simmons.) So in the first year 5 players led soild NFL careers with 3 of them being Pro Bowlers. 5 good players, with 3 PB’s, and then 4 misses. 55% on good players in the first round.
1999 NFL draft
Hits;
2. Donovan McNabb
4. Edgerrian James
5. Ricky Williams
6. Torry Holt
7. Champ Bailey
8. David Boston
10. Chris McAllister
11. Daunte Culpepper
16. Jevon Kearse
17. Damien Woody
23. Antoine Winfield
30. Patrick Kerney
31. Al Wilson
Good;
14. John Tait
15. Booger McFarland
19. Luke Petitgout
21. L.J Shelton
26. Fernando Bryant
Front 7 Drafted; 10 (1 in top 10 Chris Claiborne who is a miss) Hits and Good; 4. So 4 out of ten for 40% in the first round and a top ten miss. This brings us up to 9 out of 19 so far.
2000 Draft;
Hits;
2. Lavar Arrington
3. Chris Samuels
5. Jamal Lewis
6. Corey Simon
7. Thomas Jones
9. Brian Urlacher
12. Shaun Ellis
13. John Abraham
14. Bubba Franks
15. Deltha O’Neal
16. Julian Peterson
19. Shaun Alexander
30. Keith Bullack
Good;
8. Plaxico Burress
17. Sebatian Janakowski
18. Chad Pennington
Hits/Good; 7 Includling 3 out of 4 in the top 10 (I will let you guess who is the one miss?) Misses; 3. So 7 out of ten in this draft. Brings us to 16 out of 29 so far.
2001 NFL Draft
Hits;
1. Mike Vick (oops.)
2. Leonard Davis
5. LT
6. Richard Seymour
11. Dan Morgan
13. Marcus Stroud
16. Santana Moss
17. Steve Hutchinson
19. Casey Hampton
21. Nate Clements
23. Duece McAllister
30. Reggie Wayne
31. Todd Heap
Good;
4. Justin Smith
7. Andre Carter
18. Jeff Backus
20. Adam Archuletta
22. Will Allen
Hits/Good; 6 (Only 1 for 5 in the top ten though for HITS.) Misses; 4. So 6 for 10 solid NFL players, bringing us to 22 of 39.
2002 NFL Draft
Hits;
2. Julius Peppers
8. Roy Williams (even though he is being run out of town now.)
9. John Henderson
11. Dwight Freeney
14. Jeremy Shockey
15. Albert Haynesworth
20. Javon Walker
24. Ed Reed
26. Lito Sheppard
Good;
5. Quentin Jammer
7. Bryant McKinnie
10. Levi Jones
25. Charles Grant
29. Marc Columbo
Hits/Good; 5 (Including 2 for 3 in the top 10). Misses; 5 Bringing us to 27 out of 49.
2003 NFL Draft
Hits;
1. Carson Palmer
3. Andre Johnson (This guy is the best in the NFL.)
5. Terrance Newman
8. Jordan Gross
9. Kevin Williams
10. Terrell Suggs
11. Marcus Trufant
16. Troy Polamalu
23. Willis McGahee
27. Larry Johnson
30. Nnamdi Ashomiugha
Good;
13. Ty Warren
18. Calvin Pace
24. Dallas Clark
29. Nick Barnett
Hits/Good; 5. Misses; 7, bringing us to 32 out of 62.
A little over 50 percent for defensive front seven players are either great to good NFL players IMO. But it seems that at the top of the draft it is still a dicey choice. I wish I would have kept track but it looked like offensive guards hit at a very high rate. Soory if this is hard to read or follow I just kind of threw it together quickly.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 9, 2009 12:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No Browns
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Jan 9, 2009 11:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good info, let’s look at it, keeping in mind this is a small sample size and not many real conclusions can be reached.
Hit/Good Rates for each position taken in the top 10 from 1998-2003:
QB: 4-6 = 40%
RB: 6-1 = 86%
WR: 4-5 = 44%
OT: 6-1 = 86%
DT: 3-4 = 43%
DE: 7-3 = 70%
LB: 2-1 = 67%
DB: 7-0 = 100%
This would seem to indicate it would be wise to shy away from the WR, DT, and QB positions. Non-DT front 7 picks hit at 69, which is slightly above average for top ten picks in this range (65).
Maybe the instinct to draft Jenkins is dead on.
by danvail on Jan 12, 2009 9:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I love Crabtree. In almost every game he has played in he has been the best player on the field. WIth him and Edwards we could be looking at a Fitz/Boldin situation.
It is worth thinking about.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 4, 2009 3:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Seems to be working for the Cardinals…
by danvail on Jan 12, 2009 9:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Should the Browns get one of those third-round running backs?
That seem to do great right off the bat? Or are you guys happy with Jamal and Jerome? I know you don’t have a third-rounder at the moment, but you know what I mean…
Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history
by maryrose on Jan 4, 2009 3:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
We need some new blood. Simple as that.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 4, 2009 3:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We should get someone to replace Jason Wright. He is terrible. I wouldn’t mind sacrificing another roster spot if we could get a 4th talented back.
I’ll take one of the 4th round variety, like a Marion Barber or Brandon Jacobs who were picked back to back in the 4th in 2005. That should be easy, right?
by rufio on Jan 7, 2009 11:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
glen coffee
im not impressed with your performance
by troy145 on Jan 14, 2009 2:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure how good he’ll be in the NFL. He was running behind a great line in Alabama and that helped him immensely. I think the Browns should look at Donald Brown from Connecticut.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 14, 2009 11:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm…thought I read otherwise. Well, then, I guess it wouldn’t be wise to draft him.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 14, 2009 12:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Since we’re discussing running backs, LeSean McCoy has declared for the draft.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 14, 2009 2:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
my apologies…i just read that brown did indeed turn pro. i was pretty sure i saw an interview w/ his mom at the bowl game where she said she was proud he was going to finish his education. maybe she was confused…
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 15, 2009 12:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe he’s going pro but not telling his mom. If the Browns draft him, he’ll just tell her he’s transfering to the University of Cleveland.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 15, 2009 1:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it is pretty easy to eliminate some positions when we are discussing the number 5 pick.
No QB, RB, TE, OT, OG, C, K on offense are out. RB’s can be found late and cheap (as I watch LeRon McClain keep taking carries from Willis McGahee and rightly so). We have depth at TE, even if we trade K2 (which we won’t) we still wouldn’t waste the number 5 pick on the kid from Okie State. The offensive line has the main cogs in place with Joe Thomas, Eric Stienbech and Rex Hadnot. I doubt the Browns would drop another 50 million into a RT, so we can eliminate that. The only position I really see the Browns drafting on offense at number 5 overall is WR.
Defense on the other hand is a wide open race. I am not a fan of taking a LB in the top 15 picks, just because they can be found in any round. For every DeMarcus Ware (11th overall) and Patrick Willis (11th Overall) there is a James Harrison (Undrafted), LaMarr Woodley (2nd Round), Bart Scott (Undrafted), Lofa Tatupu (2nd Round), DeMeco Ryans (2nd Round), and Mike Vrabel (3rd Round). Too many good LB’s to waste 50 million on one. Safety is another position that unless it is a total difference maker like the fair maiden in Pittsburgh or Ed Reed, is it really worth a number 5 pick? Oakland and Mike Huff would say no as would Washington with Laron Landry. So I think we can take FS and SS off the list. Even if we go to a 4-3 I doubt the Browns would use the first pick on a DT. With Williams and Rogers we have two very good 4-3 DT’s not to mention a ton of money tied up in the position, another 50 mil won’t help.
So I think the Browns will be looking at WR, DE, OLB (if we stay at a 3-4), and CB.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 4, 2009 3:28 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wait, “Joe Thomas, Eric Stienbech and Rex Hadnot” are your cornerstones on the OL? How is Hadnot clearly a level beyond Tucker, Shaffer, and Fraley?
Also,
So I think the Browns will be looking at WR, DE, OLB (if we stay at a 3-4), and CB.
Didn’t you just make the argument against taking a LB?
Anyway, not sure who would be around for DE at that spot in the draft… but I would certainly support spending the pick/cash at DE if one shows up at that spot on the draft board. I wouldn’t mind spending the pick on a LB, or a CB, or even as discussed before a WR.
by danvail on Jan 4, 2009 6:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hadnot is a piece for two reasons. He is 26 and has 70 career starts and played well this year. He can also be moved to center where he has played for some of his career. He also has a smaller contract which pays him 3 million this year. This will be his walk year so I hope the Browns will keep him past this year. Shaffer will be 29 before the season starts and was a major disapointment this year. He is highly paid and is just not worth the money right now. Fraley is a nice decent player but in no way shape or form a player to keep as a cornerstone. He will be 32 this season and should be replaced by Hadnot at center. And if we eveer get anything out of Tucker I will be pleased, but for the Browns to expect anything out of him right now I think would be a mistake.
My argument is taking a OLB if we turn into a 4-3 team. If we stay in a 3-4, the OLB is the playmaking, pass-rushing position somthing this team dearly lacks. If we switch to a 4-3 we have no need in taking a 4-3 OLB with a top 5 pick. Sorry for any confusion.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 4, 2009 9:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I want to agree with you, but OGs are too easy to find to make him a “main cog”. Tucker is the 2nd or 3rd best OL we have, and after him, Thomas, and Steinbach there is a clear dropoff.
As for only considering a WR at that spot, yes.
by rufio on Jan 7, 2009 11:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with what you’re saying, and I think pretty much the only offensive player we’d consider taking at 5 is Crabtree (because we don’t need a QB, it’s too high to take a RB, we’re not taking a OL that high because the need isn’t there, and the only WR worth taking that high is Crabtree). So the choice is basically Crabtree or defense.
If we went defense, I wouldn’t mind taking Malcolm Jenkins. I know we need help with our front 7, but if you put him and Wright in the secondary teams are going to have a lot of trouble throwing against us. And that would make MacDonald a nickel which I think would be better for him. The argument will be that if you can’t get pressure on the QB then it doesn’t matter how great your secondary is, so we should pick a pass rusher. I could go either way. But if we want to pick defense and there’s not a stud DE there, then you gotta go with Jenkins. He’s a playmaker.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 4, 2009 10:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think I still would want defense over offense. Malcolm Jenkins would look nice in a Browns uniform…
The thing about Crabtree is that – Will he be a Calvin Johnson or a Braylon Edwards? Who knows… But I get annoyed when people say you can get a RB later in the draft so to take one early is dumb…. The same can be said for WR… (Marques Colston)
Even though the Browns have throw a ton of $$ away in free agency, that is where I would want to get our WR’s. Drafting a WR is such a crap shoot.
by AaronD on Jan 5, 2009 4:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t want a wide receiver either. Even if Crabtree is available, and he is a stud, I don’t think it would be what is best for the future of the team.
by gahnki on Jan 5, 2009 6:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The amount of RB’s taken late in the draft that have had success in the NFL far outnumber WR’s taken late. For every Colston or Brandon Marshall is a pile of Steve Slaton’s, Willie Parkers, LeRon McClain’s Terrell Davis’, Michael Turner’s and Maurice Jones-Drew’s.
It is my belief that if a team has a strong OL (and we do, it was just an injury filled, mistake prone year for us), it doesn’t matter who the RB is. There is 1 true difference making RB in the NFL. Maybe Westbrook. Peterson is the only RB that I would like the Browns to spend 50 million on.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 5, 2009 8:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Right, at any given point in the NFL, there are usually zero to three “elite” level RBs that make all the difference in the world. These are the guys that can run against anyone, behind any line. Remember when SD was just flat out terrible? They had a weak OL and little pass threat with Brees young and struggling. All those years, against 8 or 9 defenders in the box, LT would dominate. That’s elite. Barry Sanders was elite. Jim Brown was elite. The rest are just the rest.
Right now it’s probably just Peterson. Westbrook is borderline. Tomlinson was injured, but until he proves he’s back he’s off the list.
by danvail on Jan 6, 2009 8:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t even want Peterson, he fumbles and gets hurt too much. I am really glad we got Thomas instead of taking AD. I mean I like the kid, but #5 overall is way too early for RB.
by rufio on Jan 7, 2009 11:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know, can you imagine how good our offense would have been in 2007 with AD? Even with Lewis’s success, we would have dominated offensively. I think we make the playoffs that year with AD. Of course, Thomas hasn’t missed a game, and we’re back to square one whenever we miss a game from Peterson. I get your point, and would pick Thomas again given the choice, but I’d be awfully tempted to take AD.
by danvail on Jan 8, 2009 10:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know how he slid to 7th after we didn’t pick him. Gaines Adams might have been worth it for Tampa, especially in their system, but Levi Brown? LaRon Landry was an ok pick at 6 I guess, but I can’t believe that no one wanted to trade up to get AD.
by rufio on Jan 8, 2009 12:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously, I know we gave Stallworth a ton of money, but what has he done?? Never accomplished 1,000 season…….. Stupid move.
But there will be WR’s to be had in free agency this year.
Also, I think Thomas Jones is a FA. Maybe they let him walk if wants big money……
by AaronD on Jan 5, 2009 4:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Last night I watched the Fiesta Bowl to watch the Bucks and too see Brian Orakpo play firsthand again.
I was not impressed. He went against Alex Boone (a 3rd to 4th round pick in the draft) and did not dominate. The first play of the game Orakpo ran right by Boone and got himself a holding penalty. Ater that, he disappeared for the most part.
I think he will have a great combine and put up Vernon Gholston-like numbers there. I am not interested in drafting him at the 5 spot. Once again, I havent seen a defensive end/OLB play better than Brian Cushing all year. I hope we trade down.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 6, 2009 12:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I really don’t see what will be available at #5 that will make anyone want to give us something for that spot.
by fwembt on Jan 6, 2009 3:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Crabtree, if we don’t want him. Possibly a QB, either Bradford or Stafford, if one of them lasts until 5, but that’s doubtful.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 6, 2009 4:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You follow college a bit more than I do, do you think that Crabtree is so good that he will bring enough to make it worth us trading down?
by fwembt on Jan 6, 2009 7:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think outside of Calvin Johnson (watching him play in person here at GT was simply amazing. It was man vs. boys in every sense of the word.) Crabtree is the most complete WR I have seen in quite some time.
At 6-3 215 he has elite size and speed. He has been injured late this season with an akle injury and hampered him in the bowl game (4 grabs for 30 yards and a TD). He reminds me of Larry Fitzgerald. Defenses aim to shut him down and he continues to get his. He runs very good routes and has some of the best hands in all of college football.
He is a weapon in the red zone and has magnet hands. Here is a stat for you. He has had only 5 games in his college career that he didn’t score a TD. 5. That is hard to do in NCAA ‘09. He is a gangsta. Some team will fall in love, I just don’t know if Seattle will let him get by them.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 6, 2009 8:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts exactly. I know people say you shouldn’t pick a reciever high, and that’s probably usually true, but Crabtree may be one of the few exceptions. He was the best reciever in college football as a freshman. He has the size, speed, and hands that makes an elite WR. Especially if he runs a fast time in the 40 — scouts won’t be able to stop drooling. I’ve said before I wouldn’t mind the Browns drafting him, because we need playmakers on offense, but there may be another team that thinks he’s the guy who will take their team to the next level and be willing to trade up for him.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 6, 2009 8:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This is how I see it. If a team offers us a deal, we take it. If not, we grab one of the best WR’s I have seen in quite awhile. Either way, we are adding depth (more picks) or a talent (Crabtree). Win-Win.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 6, 2009 8:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Every year a player makes a few teams nuts. It was Dorsey last year at the 5 pick. New Orleans offered two first rounders and a second rounder for the number 5 pick. The Chiefs, like morons, turned it down. I would like to think that whoever is calling the shots for us would not turn down a deal like that.
But my point is, that at 5 we will have some very interesting choices to make. I think one of the big QB’s will be there. Crabtree may go to the Seahawks, but he may be there. I also believe either Oher or Andre Smith will be sitting at 5. Would it suprise anyone to see Al Davis fall in love with Crabtree? Russell, McFadden and Crabtree sounds like a nice little trio to get the Silver and Black faithful back. I’m crossing every finger and toe I have that he runs a 4.2 40.
There are a lof of premium LT’s and QB’s in this draft. We just need one desperate team.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 6, 2009 8:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Boone improved his stock dramatically last night. He handled Orakpo alone for most of the night.
by gahnki on Jan 6, 2009 3:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I still don’t think he is anything more than a 3rd to 4th round guy. He has experience and has played on big stages, but he struggles with speed rushers. He got a lot of help with Brandon Smith and backs staying in last night. He did well, better than I and most Buckeye fans expected, but I would be shocked if I heard his name inside of the first two rounds. I think Boone could really be a good guard at the NFL level, but would be a below average LT. Kind of like a Eric Stienbach type guy. Call him a Robert Gallery type(which is not a knock, Gallery is actually a pretty good guard for Oakland now.)
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 6, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Alex Boone will be a right tackle in the NFL. Brandon Smith was only in for a handful of snaps, and the backs protection scheme was weighted towards the right tackle, Bryant Browning.
by gahnki on Jan 6, 2009 9:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you kidding me? Orakpo had a very good game.
by rufio on Jan 7, 2009 11:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we stay put and take either V. Davis or Malcolm (who looked very impressive last night) or we go for one of the linebackers like Aaron Curry
by Roger Dorn on Jan 6, 2009 5:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Texas didn’t even throw at Jenkins all night because they were so scared of him (expect the one pass on the crossing route where he may have been picked or something; I couldn’t see on the replay). That’s what Deion Sanders would do to a passing game; take away half of the field. I’m not saying that Jenkins will be Deion in the pros, because that’s a very high standard, but he’ll be good.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 6, 2009 8:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Malcom Jenkins is a clone of Antione Winfield.
I can’t remember seeing a better hitter at CB than Malcom.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 6, 2009 8:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The question is then why wasn’t Jenkins guarding Cosby the entire game. Forget sides of the field, if he is that good put him on the guy that is absolutely torching you
by Roger Dorn on Jan 6, 2009 11:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The only problem is that Shipley is also a very good WR. They would have gone away from Malcom no matter who he was covering.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 6, 2009 11:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I don’t think it was which side of the field they were on; Shipley was McCoy’s favorite target all season so they probably wanted Jenkins covering him most of the time.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 7, 2009 7:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shipley was their best offensive threat. You can’t play a cat and mouse game where you chase a player across the field. It opens things up for everyone else. OSU basically forced Texas to work one side of the field by keeping MJ on the boundary.
by gahnki on Jan 7, 2009 3:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
someone may correct me, but I believe the Buckeye’s defensive scheme has a corner cover a side of the field, depending on which hash the ball is on/near. With the hashes being so far apart in college, it makes a bid difference.
by Ryan Kelsey on Jan 8, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That is correct, the cover and boundary corner.
by gahnki on Jan 8, 2009 4:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yea thats what i figured. i generally am not a fan of that system, when there are obvious cases that a certain guy should be guarding the most talented receiver no matter what
by Roger Dorn on Jan 8, 2009 7:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But if you’re talking about Texas, they had two talented recievers, so Jenkins couldn’t have covered them both.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 8, 2009 7:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
also, it helps when you like to play a lot of zone. It makes things more simple and flexible.
by Ryan Kelsey on Jan 9, 2009 11:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shipley is better than Cosby. And it isn’t like Cosby was tearing OSU up with YAC yardage all night. He was catching little hitchs/curls/slants with minimal YAC. Really, the only significant YAC was the last touchdown in which he was matched up against a safety.
by gahnki on Jan 9, 2009 6:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Player Bio; Aaron Curry
6-3 247lbs. My player comparison; Lance Briggs
Curry right now is the flavor of the month in NFL draft talk. I think he will put up some very nice numbers at the combine. He is strong and runs well. With the impending hire of Eric Mangini I really don’t see Curry as an option for us at 5. I see Curry as 4-3 OLB that would fit well in a tampa 2 system.
Here is a quick highlight video and a draft scouting report.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 6, 2009 8:57 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Curry would fit right in at ILB in Mangini’s scheme and he could be the impact guy that DQ needs to play next to. If he runs good times (particularly in the first 10 yards of the 40, the shuttles, and the 3 cone drill) I would certainly not mind getting him.
by rufio on Jan 7, 2009 11:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But didn’t Mangini ship Vilma out when he got there for being to small? Vilma is listed at 6-1 230 lbs, but I do think we need an impact ILB. If we hire Kokinos for Baltimore, I would be shocked if we didn’t make a real strong push for Bart Scott, making the ILB spoken for. I would have liked him if we went to a 4-3, but now I think we are out.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 8, 2009 5:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
6’3" and about 250 is way bigger than 6’1" and 230 soaking wet. We should wait till the combine to see how big players actually are before we make those sorts of judgments, though.
Also, I don’t know how to judge these sorts of things (or even if a pseudo-scientific method exists) but some players get dramatically bigger when they get to the NFL. It wouldn’t be unprecedented to see a guy put 10 good pounds on. It would be much more unusual to see a guy who has been in the league for a few years (like Vilma) to put on that kind of weight and stay fast.
I have no idea why Mangini shipped Vilma out. I don’t know much about Vilma other than he used to be really good and since Mangini got there he hasn’t been all that good. His strengths/weaknesses could be way different than Curry’s, even if they had similar height/weight combinations: Maurice Jones-Drew plays much differently than Darren Sproles.
Any LB who has top-15 stock should at least be on our radar.
by rufio on Jan 10, 2009 10:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Crabtree? You guys are trippin
A new GM means trading down that high a$$ 1st rounder to pick up some of those picks that Savage gave away.
Just trading down to the 11th pick could get you another 2nd, maybe even a low first—especially if Crabtree is still available for some team who covets him.
Playmakers on defense can be found in the 10-13 range. The best CB or LB in the draft should be the priority. Ryan may want to run the 4-3, but it shouldn’t matter. Best playmaking defender can play in any formation.
Anybody got hopes Ryan brings over Ahmdi Osimuwahahaha—or pushes to get Kirk Morrison? You never know what Al Davis will agree to. Ahmdi is an unrestricted FA.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Jan 8, 2009 12:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nnamdi will cost a ridiculous amount of money. Nate Clements money. I don’t think we should go after him. If his price is not that high I would love him on the Browns because he is a big, physical corner who would compliment McDonald/Wright well. I would take Thomas Howard or Derrick Burgess too if Oakland is giving players away.
by rufio on Jan 8, 2009 12:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
One of those ends would be awesome
combined with the push you already have up the middle.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Jan 8, 2009 1:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention the Oakland has used the exclusive tag on Nnamdi the past year or so. Not interested.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 8, 2009 5:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just trading down to the 11th pick could get you another 2nd, maybe even a low first
Where do you get that?
by fwembt on Jan 8, 2009 12:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Draft charts, which are probably giving top picks too much value based on the activity of the last few years, state that 5th – 11th = 45th. 1700 – 1250 = 450
by danvail on Jan 8, 2009 1:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Can I just say that I hate, hate, hate draft charts. They were initially set up to give rough guides on the value of draft picks. The problems now are that values have shifted slightly, and one GM will always be hesitant to trade because Joe Moron fan can go Google the draft chart and say that he should have gotten a 2017 6th round pick thrown in, and if this GM can’t understand a simple draft chart, how can he run an organization? The next week is spent answering questions from poor media members who can’t think on their own about the draft chart and must parrot the drunk idiots from section 143.
by Fundamentals on Jan 8, 2009 9:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. At a minimum, they need to be updated on an annual basis to reflect modern trends and values.
They’ll also never be as accurate as they once were, especially when discussing a top ten pick, until we can get some kind of a cap on rookie contracts. As long as teams are rightfully avoiding committing 20-30 mil guaranteed on an unproven rookie, the charts are useless in this context.
They still probably hold some value for late round swaps.
by danvail on Jan 9, 2009 11:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ESPN published an “updated” draft chart in ESPN the magazine. I threw the magazine out and can’t find it anywhere online. It seemed much more realistic in terms of how much value a particular pick actually held.
Someone better at the internet than me should look for it.
by rufio on Jan 10, 2009 10:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I saw that as well. I no longer have it, but it was quite interesting. It surprised as ESPN infrequently writes relevant and poignant material.
by gahnki on Jan 10, 2009 10:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Damn I always throw that magazine out too. Know roughly when they published that?
by danvail on Jan 11, 2009 12:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I get it as part of my Insider subscription but never read it (I assume that’s why you guys get it). So I called them and had the magazine sent to my younger brother because I knew he’d like it. So if you don’t read it you can have it sent to anyone you know. I think you can also have it sent to military personnel overseas if you don’t want it, but I’m not sure. You can call their customer service phone number and ask.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 11, 2009 1:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I want to say last spring around draft season? Maybe?
by rufio on Jan 12, 2009 3:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I have a stack of old ESPN mags sitting on a shelf, I’ll check it to see if I can find it.
by danvail on Jan 12, 2009 10:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How did you guys get Brady Quinn?
You traded your next year’s 1st and a superhigh 2nd that year for Dallas’ pick in the 20’s. Who’s to say that a team in the lower half of the draft won’t don the same for a no.5.
A top 5 pick is coveted by teams who want that one guy. Cleveland needs more than that one guy.
George Teague did it all.
by Aaron Novinger on Jan 8, 2009 1:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Many, many teams need more than one guy. It’s not that easy.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 8, 2009 1:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s not impossible, but fans here, every year we have a high pick, constantly clamor to trade down as if there will always be this sort of deal. The fact of the matter is, it’s highly uncommon that a deal that presents real value for a high pick is available. Just review the past few years. How many teams had a top 5 pick? How many traded it?
Assuming it’s necessarily going to be an option is foolishness. You have to plan as if you’re making the pick, while simultaneously knowing what it would take to move you off the pick. If a good deal comes around, then you have the option, but it’s not likely to be there. Saying “it could happen!” does make it a probable.
by danvail on Jan 8, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Except it’s not that easy to trade down. Every year, fans say their GM needs to trade down to get more picks. The problem is finding someone willing to trade up and give away those picks. Many teams don’t want high picks because they don’t want to pay the big contracts those picks demand. If we could get a good deal to trade down to 10 or 12 and get a 2nd rounds like you said, I’d be all for it, but we need to find a team to trade with. And a team that wants a guy at 5 and is willing to pay that price.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 8, 2009 1:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not that this will affect the Browns draft, but Beanie Wells is going pro.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 8, 2009 4:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Good for him. It would likely have been a colossal mistake for him to stay. Say what you will about Leinart sliding for #1 to #10, but RBs have much shorter careers and much higher injury risks. It’s impossible to fault him for taking the money as a first round pick.
by danvail on Jan 9, 2009 11:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Definately. Of any position, RB’s are the ones who should leave early because of the reasons you said. It’s not like Wells was going to become a better runner staying another year at OSU. I don’t fault him at all.
It will be interesting where he goes. He showed in the first half of the Fiesta Bowl why he’s the best RB in college, and why NFL scouts love him, but the injury risk is going to drop him. If he can stay healthy for a full season he’ll be a beast in the NFL.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 9, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Whoops, screwed that comment placement up… re-placed:
He’s one of those players that could end up anywhere in the first round. As much as I don’t want to draft him, I think whoever does will be pretty happy with him if he slides past say, #12 or so.
by danvail on Jan 9, 2009 12:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He’s one of those players that could end up anywhere in the first round. As much as I don’t want to draft him, I think whoever does will be pretty happy with him if he slides past say, #12 or so.
by danvail on Jan 9, 2009 12:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Cleveland was the second most run on team in the NFL. This is because Cleveland would always drop 7 seven and leave it to Shaun Rogers to stop the run. I believe that we have to take Malcom Jenkins he will start from day one and let us keep at least 6 in the box.
by Sizemorgasim on Jan 10, 2009 7:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Here is the list of guys who have declared as of Jan. 10th
Kenny Britt Rutgers WR Jr.
Eben Britton Arizona OT Jr.
Donald Brown Connecticut RB Jr.
Everette Brown Florida State DE Jr.
James Casey Rice TE So.
Glen Coffee Alabama RB Jr.
Austin Collie BYU WR Jr.
Michael Crabtree Texas Tech WR So.
Andrew Davie Arkansas TE Jr.
Vontae Davis Illinois CB Jr.
Josh Freeman Kansas State QB Jr.
Shonn Greene Iowa RB Jr.
Darrius Heyward-Bey Maryland WR Jr.
P.J. Hill Wisconsin RB Jr.
Greg Isdaner West Virginia OL Jr.
Jeremy Maclin Missouri WR So.
Sen’Derrick Marks Auburn DL Jr.
Gerald McRath Southern Miss LB Jr.
Captain Munnerlyn South Carolina CB Jr.
D.J. Moore Vanderbilt CB Jr.
Knowshon Moreno Georgia RB So.
Hakeem Nicks North Carolina WR Jr.
Kevin Ogletree Virginia WR Jr.
Jerraud Powers Auburn DB Jr.
Andre Smith Alabama OT Jr.
Matthew Stafford Georgia QB Jr.
Chris Wells Ohio State RB Jr.
I have already stated that I have a man crush on Glen Coffee. Most have him as a 3-4 round pick. More will follow, I will try and post them as I come across them.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 10, 2009 9:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
A lot of those kids are not going to be picked where they hope/think they will be picked.
The more the market is flooded with guys who could go late in the 1st round, the better our 2nd rounder looks. We might have a bigger chance to trade that pick down for more picks than our first.
by rufio on Jan 10, 2009 10:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Josh Freeman? Does he really think he can play QB in the NFL? Quarterbacks should only declare if they’re going to be first-round picks, like Stafford or Bradford. That’s the position where I think you have the best chance to improve your stock by staying another year because there is so much to learn.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 11, 2009 1:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Freeman will be a first or second round pick. He has everything you want.
by gahnki on Jan 11, 2009 1:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Really? I guess I haven’t seen him play that much, and hadn’t read much about him being a first-day pick. I thought he was more of a running QB and not much of a passer. I guess my assumptions were incorrect.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 11, 2009 2:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
-A few accurate throws, but it was a highlight reel (right?) so can’t give the final verdict.
-Some display of arm strength and while he didn’t flash Brett Favre or Carson Palmer kinds of throws, he didn’t look like he really tried to. Threw a pretty deep comeback pattern and the ball had good zip.
-Good mobility
-Lots of wide-open targets against Texas Tech’s D.
-Stared down his targets too much
Flacco was a first rounder, the only reason I can see for this guy not being picked by the end of the 2nd is if other more talented/proven QBs are out there.
by rufio on Jan 12, 2009 4:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That number will grow immensely in the next few weeks. That is when the people who should not go, but feel they are ready, are sick of their current situation, or have another reason, will declare.
by gahnki on Jan 10, 2009 10:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I still say Tebow should have declared. He’s unlikely to increase his draft stock in the next year.
by danvail on Jan 12, 2009 10:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The king of college football or a guy without a position in the pros? I think he made the right choice
by Roger Dorn on Jan 12, 2009 11:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If he ever wants to make any NFL money, he’s better off getting drafted for certain (even if it is 4th round) and getting to work than risking injury or degrading performance and never getting a better shot.
by danvail on Jan 12, 2009 11:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt his draft stock goes much lower, no matter what happens this year. His only risk is an injury, and while that’s certainly a risk I think a shot at a second Heisman, a third national championship, and possibly being the greatest player in the history of college football is worth that risk. Can you imagine how much ESPN will be fawning over Tebow if Florida goes undefeated next year? They will have a “greatest player in college footbal history” countdown before the bowls like they did with USC a few years ago.
Really, though, Tebow made the right choice. He wasn’t going to be picked high, so why go? Maybe he can improve his draft stock with another year in college. I really doubt his stock goes down because it’s not that high to begin with.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 12, 2009 1:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This is all true, but for his sake I really hope he doesn’t get McGahee-ed and ruin a knee. Imagine if he gets his knee shredded in week 3 next year. The way he plays, it’s a legitimate possibility. Without his athleticism, or with the threat of not being able to recover his athleticism, he may not get drafted at all. Further, with his draft stock being so low even when perfectly healthy, he’s not likely to be able to take out the kind of insurance policy that will pay him enough to not have to work if he does suffer a career-ender.
No college-aged person tends to think this way, but I guarantee if he had an agent he’d be urging Tebow to go pro now.
by danvail on Jan 13, 2009 3:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
if he gets hurt, i’m sure thom brennaman would convert his garage into place where tebow could stay for a while…just to get back on track.
honestly, tebow seems like the type of kid who doesn’t care about what comes next. sure, he’d love to play in the NFL, but it’s not a money or fame thing, at least as far as i can tell. and if he can’t play football, he does appear to be one of those rare college kids who has a fall-back plan (religious-type stuff).
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 13, 2009 4:57 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Obviously it’s a personal choice, and their are benefits to staying, but it’s not the obvious choice some people are making it out to be. Of course he’d have a support system to get healthy, but what if he loses a step in the process, or gets a staph infection, or simply misses the bulk of the season and loses footing there? These are all real considerations he should have, and probably did, kept in mind.
Personally, though, I’d have gone back to Florida for the year and lived the Leinart life, but then I’m not the hardcore religious type.
by danvail on Jan 14, 2009 8:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
or gets a staph infection
What, you think we’d draft him? /sarc/
He may be religious and all, but I think the focus on his personal life would be the mission work he and his family do, not necessarily the religious aspect of it though.
I could see him being very content to go do mission work the rest of his life and skip the NFL. Although I do believe he’d miss the competitiveness of football, he seems to be happy doing the other stuff as well.
Also, scratch of Rolle (CB) from Florida St from the draft boards … he decided to take the Rhodes schiolorship at Oxford and delay the NFL for now.
by talonk on Jan 14, 2009 11:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
If he learns to throw just a little tiny bit better everyone will notice and someone will draft him higher.
by rufio on Jan 12, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d rather take him in the 5th round as a safety.
by danvail on Jan 13, 2009 3:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He doesn’t have enough speed to be a safety. He is a tight end or H-Back.
by gahnki on Jan 13, 2009 4:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i still think he gets look as a qb in the league. call me crazy, but he’s got the physical tools, he’s clearly a leader, and 65%+ accuracy is pretty strong. not saying it’s a lock, but i think he surprises people in the NFL w/ his ability to qb at that level.
of course, keep in mind that i watched pretty much all of 4 florida games this year…so i’m essentially a professional scout.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 13, 2009 4:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The thing about Tebow is this, Alex Smith played in the same offense under the same coach and put up the same numbers. Alex Smith was more “pro ready” than Tebow is.
Alex Smith sucks. Tebow is not a NFL QB. He will be a nice Mike Alstott type runner though.
Full discloure here; I don’t like Tebow. I think he is fake. Anyone who passes up a trip to the Playboy mansion needs to be watched with both eyes IMO.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 13, 2009 5:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you kidding? You don’t think a college football player can be an honestly good, religious person?
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 13, 2009 7:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Let’s call it the Kirby Puckett/Kobe Bryant Syndrome. Maybe it is just me waiting for the other shoe to drop, but I think the kid is fake.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 14, 2009 1:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
in all fairness, kirby and kobe (interesting examples) never made spring break trips to missionary camps in the phillipines during college to provide medical assistance. hard for me to see how he’s a fake, but that’s your opinion.
think AC Green, or even Mahmoud Abdul Raouf (much more controversial, clearly, but no less dedicated), more than the guys you referenced.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 14, 2009 2:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t forget, Kirby Puckett won the 1993 Branch Rickey award for his community service.
I guess I’m just a cynic when it comes to Tebow.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 14, 2009 2:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You guys know that you can believe in God, help your community and rape someone. The three aren’t mutually exclusive.
Tebow may be a zealous tool, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t a good guy for trying to make the world a better place. It also doesn’t mean he may not get drunk some day and commit a felony.
by Ryan Kelsey on Jan 15, 2009 12:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You guys know that you can believe in God, help your community and rape someone. The three aren’t mutually exclusive.
OK, I’ll give it a shot…
Raping a rapist on any day except the Sabbath?
by danvail on Jan 15, 2009 3:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You guys know that you can believe in God, help your community and rape someone. The three aren’t mutually exclusive.
Someone may “believe” in God, but he will not be following God’s word if he rapes someone. Unless there is a religion I am unaware of that uses rape as a form of prayer.
by gahnki on Jan 15, 2009 4:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
let’s stick to the football, folks
think we can draft the Holy Ghost at 5…?
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 15, 2009 4:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s good.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 15, 2009 9:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I did not really mean that as a religious point. Merely that there is a distinction between believing in something and following it. I may believe that someone needs to take out the trash. It does not mean I will actually do it.
by gahnki on Jan 15, 2009 5:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
right, and that is the same distinction I’m making, basically. Tebow may believe in a religion and not be at all fake in that belief. That doesn’t mean that he won’t break one of the principles of that religion someday. And it doesn’t mean that instance won’t be pretty serious.
by Ryan Kelsey on Jan 15, 2009 11:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Of course, no human being is perfect, no matter how religious they are. Everyone makes mistakes. But Tebow seems to be a genuine about his beliefs and is trying to help people; he’s not just preaching to people like many athletes do. I see no reason to think he’s fake, as one person suggested.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 16, 2009 10:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It was just my personal feeling.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 17, 2009 5:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Kobe?? How is he a comparison to Tim Tebow? I never remember hearing him talk about being religious.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 14, 2009 2:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I meant that he was the face of a sport. He was supposed to be a great guy, being a spokesman for McDonalds and such. It was just a quick comparison.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 14, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
OK, but that doesn’t mean anything about Kobe’s character. Many high-profile athletes are bad people, but that doesn’t mean all of them are. Tony Dungy talks openly about his faith all the time. I know he’s a coach, but he’s a former NFL player also so he was an athlete. So is he being fake?
I commend Tebow for taking the stances he has (not going to the Playboy mansion) and doing the mission trip. This world would be a much better place if more athletes and famous people acted like him.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 14, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
65% accuracy means nothing in the offense he plays in. Half of his passes are shallow crosses or screens. He almost never has to go through real progressions i.e., pre-snap keys, recognize coverage after snap, throw correct route, etc. Most of the time, he is keying one guy and he knows where to go with the ball based off of that one read.
His first interception came on a flat/vertical combination where the offense was trying to high-low the corner. Tebow was simply reading the corner’s drop and putting the ball where he wasn’t. His arm strength betrayed him and the safety picked him off. That game actually hurt Tebow’s chances. The only thing he was good at was running the option.
by gahnki on Jan 13, 2009 5:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He could get a look at QB, especially by someone desperate, but he would have to really improve his arm strength and his passing accuracy to have a legit shot. Not saying it’s impossible, but it is very unlikely (that he ever becomes a legit NFL QB, not that someone crazy won’t try).
I’d say the better bet is that he becomes a TE/H back like gahnki said. The Alstott comparison is flat out ridiculous, though. He runs tough, sure. But he is a lot taller and longer than Alstott was, he weighs a lot less and is no where close to as strong. He bounces off of 170lb college DBs and 210lb college LBs, but I doubt he will look the same going up against people bigger than he is.
by rufio on Jan 14, 2009 4:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Probably true. As an OSU fan, I think I’d like to see him fail at LB.
You see, as a Cleveland fan, that’s where I get my jollies, watching other teams/players fail as well.
by danvail on Jan 14, 2009 8:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d actually like to see Tebow succeed. He seems like a generally nice guy. Unfortunately, he just lacks the talent level for the QB position.
by gahnki on Jan 14, 2009 7:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d love to see him undrafted because his stubborness to not change positions. Then I’d love him to sign with a team as a TE and quit after week 1.
by Ryan Kelsey on Jan 15, 2009 12:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He will not be a quarterback in the NFL. So why not play the position you love for one more season while having all of the benefits of college? It’s a no-brainer in my opinion. He’s the King of Gainesville.
by gahnki on Jan 12, 2009 4:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
By the way, Greg Hardy just declared. He could be around in the second round if the Browns are interested. Here is a quick look at him;
6-4 265lbs 4.7 40 time
Only real drawback to Hardy is that he has been injured a lot at Ole Miss. Without his injury history he is a sure fire first round pick. He has played all three years as a DE in Ole Miss’ 4-3 scheme. Two years ago, going against top 5 pick Andre Smith of Alabama he registered 4 sacks and a FF. The kid is talented. He lead the SEC in sacks in 2007 only starting four out of the ten games he appeared in. This year he played well getting 7 sacks after missing the early part of the season with a foot injury. The only question is can he play the OLB position AND stay healthy.
Comparision; Calvin Pace
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 13, 2009 5:46 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Lets wait until the combine or at least pro days before quoting 40 times. I just don’t trust peoples’ listed times.
As for Hardy, we need all the pass rush we can get. Injuries=scary, though. I think there will be enough of those DE —> OLB guys where we pick in the 2nd to be able to choose between 2 or 3 of them. Maybin, Orakpo, E. Brown, Cushing, Maualuga, Hardy, and Hughes are all those types of guys who can get to the QB, and are all rated in the Scouts Inc top 32. Selvie out of USF is another guy who was slowed by injury this year but has a history of getting to the passer. Tons of these guys out there, I would be surprised if we don’t get one or even two of them.
by rufio on Jan 14, 2009 4:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah!! Either we can draft him or trade the pick to another team who wants him (provided Seattle doesn’t take him first).
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 13, 2009 7:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Third round, Glen Coffee
He’ll be there and he’ll be a steal.
im not impressed with your performance
by troy145 on Jan 14, 2009 2:03 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree, but we need to get a 3rd rounder first.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 14, 2009 1:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bradford is coming back, early scuttlebutt is that Sanchez will declare in the next forty eight hours.
by gahnki on Jan 14, 2009 4:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Damn — Bradford staying makes the 5th pick a little less valuable. He would have been a top 3 pick, probably, so that moves all the rest of the players up one spot in the draft.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 14, 2009 5:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh, why on earth is he staying? I hope he falls into the second round for 2010 just to hammer this point home to future top 5 quarterbacks.
We might see some quarterbacks requesting an extra year of eligibility to avoid being drafted by the Lions…
by danvail on Jan 14, 2009 5:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
let’s hope sanchez declares and we can just cancel/replace all the bradford talk with sanchez, and we’re no worse off in the 5 slot (although i’m not sure he’s as highly thought of at this stage as bradford)
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 14, 2009 5:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I haven’t heard Sanchez mentioned that high, but who knows what will happen after all the workouts. There a couple teams in the top 5 who have a big need at QB.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 14, 2009 7:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
funny, after making the comment above i spoke to a friend who works in the NFL…he thinks Sanchez goes 1
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 14, 2009 7:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, I would be suprised, but lets hope your friend is right for the Browns sake.
by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 14, 2009 8:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sanchez is the best quarterback on the board. I’ve never seen a performance like the one he put on PSU. He works a pro-style offense at USC perfectly.
by gahnki on Jan 14, 2009 8:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i actually agree on sanchez. i live in LA and watch most of the SC games…the guy is awesome. he’s going to be a better-than-good pro. i just haven’t heard much chatter about him from the McShay – Kiper dildoes of the world.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 15, 2009 11:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Same here. All they talked about was Bradford v. Stafford, with no mention of where Sanchez would rank. He looked great tearing up a good Penn St. defense in the Rose Bowl. This morning on Mike and Mike they mentioned McShay’s number rankings, whatever the hell those mean, and Sachez was right between Bradford and Stafford in his rankings. I think he could definately go in the top 5, so now we’re going to hear a Sanchez v. Stafford debate.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 15, 2009 11:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He can go in the top 5. I am a lot less sure about him than you guys are though.
He played with more talent against less talent than a lot of those other QBs. USC is arguably more talented than any team in the nation, including those in the SEC, and the toughest defenses they played were OSU (who had no offense and had to be on the field forever and were clearly not ready schematically, even if they are somewhat talented) and PSU (who just arent that good).
That Cover-3 Penn St ran against him was a joke and they ran it almost every single play. Penn St. looked terrified of USC’s wideouts and their safety that they dropped deep is slower than I am.
If I were a team in need of a QB, I would be happy to land him and I do believe his declaration makes our pick more valuable. I just wouldn’t be surprised to see someone less heralded make a bigger impact in the NFL.
by rufio on Jan 15, 2009 1:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not that it makes our first rounder better, but our second rounder looks a lot better with Percy Harvin and Spikes from Florida declaring.
by rufio on Jan 15, 2009 1:49 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Spikes changed his mind. He’s staying.
by gahnki on Jan 15, 2009 4:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I saw that literally 15 seconds after I posted this on ESPN. I cursed them.
by rufio on Jan 16, 2009 5:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Did anyone catch Pete Carroll’s news conference with Sanchez? He had an absolute meltdown. I expected more out of him.
by gahnki on Jan 15, 2009 8:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Could you imagine Tressel doing this? Never.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 16, 2009 10:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Can you imagine both the Browns 1st rounder and the Buckeyes’ chances next year looking better in one fell swoop?
by rufio on Jan 16, 2009 5:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
just saw the highlights on espnews…he sounded completely ridiculous. if i’m sanchez, i’m pretty pissed at the way pete conducted himself. feel free to voice all that stuff to sanchez privately, but don’t you have to just smile and say “we’re thrilled for mark and can’t wait to see him succeed” at the presser?
that said, i think sanchez will be palmer-quality good in the pros. so, not only did pete sound like a crochety old man, but i think he was flat out-wrong, too.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 16, 2009 12:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he is closer to leinert than palmer. Palmer is once a decade talent, I think. Sanchez isn’t.
by Ryan Kelsey on Jan 16, 2009 11:29 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure either is a really fair comparison – there’s a fairly wide gulf there. Leinart hasn’t been able to keep a starting role. Palmer has been fantastic when healthy.
by danvail on Jan 16, 2009 12:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t really believe it was about PC’s fear of Sanchez not being ready for the NFL. I think it’s clear that it had more to do with the scary depth chart situation at USC behind Sanchez. Their offense is one of the most quarterback intensive ones in CFB. Without Sanchez, they have Mitch Mustain, who was passed on the depth chart by a true freshman last year, Aaron Corp, and a true freshman, Matt Barkley. That spells trouble for the USC offense.
by gahnki on Jan 16, 2009 1:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i could not agree with you more. this is strictly selfishness on pete’s part, though that selfishness manifested as “he’s setting himself up to fail”…the point really seems to be “he’s setting USC up to fail”…
i was joking with a couple of friends about how mustain must have felt watching that presser. thanks a ton for the vote of confidence, coach. in fairness, mustain surged past corp by mid-season last year, and ended up as the clear back-up to sanchez. that said, i think barkley’s your Trojans starter in the fall.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 16, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Corp actually re-passed Mustain during bowl practices.
I don’t think this especially matters, though. Whomever gets the job will earn it during the spring/fall.
by gahnki on Jan 16, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
dammit…i usually try not to let the facts get in the way of a good story…good catch.
your last point is right, though. the job will be earned in the spring, w/ barkley firmly in the mix, as he’s enrolled at SC this semester.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 16, 2009 2:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes and no ….
Yes because a win over USC would help with the shattered rep they currently have.
No because a win over a freshman (Barkley) led squad on the road in the ’Shoe will give all the haters reason to discount the win.
by talonk on Jan 16, 2009 7:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
carroll did the full rounds on the radio in LA today, stressing how much he loves mark sanchez, and how his concern stems solely from wanting the absolute best for sanchez, and that his point was that the risk is high but that they’re going to do everything they can to support him. nice attempt at a save…he was getting shellacked in LA for most of the day.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 16, 2009 8:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mel Kiper has his first (of probably a hundred) mock draft out today. He has the Browns taking Aaron Curry, LB from Wake Forest. His top three picks are Matt Stafford, Andre Smith, Mark Sanchez, and Michael Crabtree. (FWIW, he has Laurinitis going all the way down at 29 to the Giants, behind both Maluaga and Cushing, and Beanie Wells going to Philly at 21.) Of course, those rankings are probably going to change quite a bit after the combine and personal workouts.
Personally, I’d like to see the Browns take one of three guys: Crabtree, Curry, or Jenkins. As I’ve said before, I think Crabtree is an explosive game-changing WR and the Browns definately need playmakers on offense. I’ve seen Jenkins play a lot, obviously, and he’s a shut-down corner who can also make plays on special teams (2 blocked punts this year). Pairing him with Wright in the secondary, and having McDonald as our nickel, would make it a lot harder for teams to throw on us. I don’t know much about Curry, but I’ve seen all the mock drafts rank him high and I’ve heard great things about him so I’m assuming he’s a good fit for us (since we could use a few good linebackers).
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 22, 2009 7:59 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Here is another mock draft, this one from SI.com’s Don Banks. He has the Browns taking Jenkins, with Brian Orakpo from Texas going the next pick to the Bengals (I know he’s another guy that has been mentioned with the Browns). Interestingly, he has the Lions passing on a QB and selecting Andre Smith first overall. Both drafts, and many others, have Crabtree going to the Seahawks, so it looks like the Browns will miss out on him unless something unexpected happens.
The best thing probably is to hit [Grady] 2nd -- Jay
by Buckeye Brad on Jan 22, 2009 1:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















