Dawgs By Nature: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cottagers Confidential for Fulham FC Fans!

From a non-Browns fan re: James Davis' injury


1st, congrats on the win.

As a Steelers fan, I am rooting for the Browns to come back and be relevant again. Please keep winning!

But, I have an issue that is killing me, and that is the common thread with some bad teams regarding their front offices.

Time and time again I see some shady/underhanded/slippery type of behavior that belies something underneath the surface with some teams' coaches/front office. Most recently we've seen the 49ers file tampering charges against the New York Jets concerning Michael Crabtree. As soon as that was filed, the Jets appeared to back off, cooling Crabtrees leverage, and pushing him closer to his deal last week with the 49ers, with a tail-between-his-legs appearance. Were the Jets tampering? We don't know. But was it more than just mere coincidence that after the 49ers filed that claim, they signed Crabtree? And was it again just mere coincidence that immediately after they unofficially, errr, lost the Crabtree angle, they sign Braylon Edwards? (The same day, in fact).

I'm usually an optomist, and would like to believe in the inherent good in people. But money and power corrupts, and both are heavily involved in the National Football League. I will leave you to decide for yourselves if the Jets were pursuing Crabtee illegally, and just coincidentally made the deal for Edwards immediately after Crabtrees' signing with the 49ers.

But this all just leads me to ask the question regarding James Davis' injury. Davis was apparently hurt in  a recent post-practice "opportunity period" when he was hit by a Browns linebacker. According to the report, witnesses said Davis was not wearing shoulder pads while the unidentified defender who hit him had them on.

Seems simple enough. Rookie hurt during practice, albeit a little strange since he was not wearing the proper protective equipment.

What concerns me is the coach-speak, and the double talk that sounds important and good on the surface, but really says nothing.

According to the report, "League spokesman Greg Aiello said the league is aware of the alleged incident and has been looking into the matter."

And from Coach Eric Mangini, the fearless commander who loves dispensing information apparently as much as his sage mentor Bill Belicheat:

"I talked to the league about it and feel comfortable with where we are on it," Mangini said. "I like James Davis a lot. The last thing we want to do is ever put him in a position or anybody in a position where they could get hurt. I've talked to a lot of people involved in it and we're going to continue to work with the league on it."

My two cents, and take from it what you wish...

1) The incident in question is not alleged. The details concerning the cause of the injury are. There's a talented rookie not playing this week, nor for the rest of the year, and being prepped for surgery. Done for the year, affected hopefully just for that long, not longer. How it happened is relevant, but more so, you the fans and the Browns, the team, are suffering for it.

2) Mangini says he is "comfortable" with where they are at with the investigation. I'm sorry, but no investigation is going to make someone "comfortable," especially when it will all fall in Mangini's lap if/when there is a failure to run practices (whether they are regualr or additional rookie practices) legally, and safely, within league guidelines. Hell, try the guidelines of COMMON SENSE at the very least. 

3) Mangini has talked to a lot of people involved...really. Good. But shouldn't he have SOME kind of influence over these practices? They are, after all, additional to the standard team practice, and includes primarily his younger talent he's developing for the future. I know a coach can't be all places at all times, but you sure as hell can hire people to be able to run these practices correctly.

His lack of being straightforward and open about the situation is what troubles me the most, Browns Fan. This is NOT meant as a knock on your team, or a chance for me to gloat over the condition of your franchise. Like I said before, I long for the Steelers-Browns rivalries of the past. I would love to hate you with more passion than I hate those full-of-themselves Ratbirds over in Baltimore. I would love to see your center pancake Ray Lewis as he attempts to knife through and stuff your running back at the goal line, and watch Lewis stumble over to the Browns bench and have a seat, thinking it's the Ravens sideline. That would be amazing. Please make that happen, so we can hate you again. We want to despise you and hate you. We really do.

I'm writing this because, I fear, you have a Belicheck  disciple that is more "Belicheat" than "Belicheck." I'm not sure the integrity is there to be a solid spine for your football team to lead you into the future success you are hoping for.

I'm intereseted in knowing your thoughts.

0 recs  |  Comment 158 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Yeah, this isn’t good. Players get hurt enough, let alone with a stupid drill.

This should help us getting free agents.

by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 12, 2009 6:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think the quote you got from Mangini was manipulated in a sense that it deleted relevant information. Would you mind providing the source?

I had found the following similar, but different quote.

"If something like that happened, it would never be something sanctioned by the team. I talked to the league about it and the last thing we want to do is put somebody in position to get hurt. I feel good about our position."

I find it odd that this particular part of the quote would be deleted, but I can’t say I am all that surprised.

The key difference, of course, is never sanctioned by the team.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 12, 2009 6:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Additionally, to address your point about being straightforward, the portion I highlighted is in fact the straightforward aspect of his response.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 12, 2009 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just hope this doesnt turn out to be one of those rookie hazings.

by talonk on Oct 12, 2009 7:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Syndric Steptoe also got hurt and is blaming Mangini.

by TheRealSlimShady on Oct 12, 2009 7:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No, he’s whining because he got hurt and it was rainy.

by rufio on Oct 12, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I got mine from both NFL.com and the same quote came from ESPN.com.

So as a fan, and not someone who has every coach in my office to hear and copy the interviews & commets made in person, Ican be just as informed as you on the matter.

And I don’t think you really addressed the actual issue. The issue is not driven by the quote, the issue is what it is, and the quote came about BECAUSE of the issue.

So…with that being said, maybe comment on the rest of what I presented.

And expound on why you are surprised at the things you are surprised by. You mentioned that twice in two short posts, so it must be important, but it seems you are being just as elusive as your head coach. Tell ms what you meant by that?

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 12, 2009 7:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I have a hard time following what you mean here. I was not trying to call into question your credibility, I wanted to note for everyone that a key part of the quote was missing, namely that Mangini specifically said any such activity like that was not sanctioned by the team. I find it particularly interesting that ESPN omitted this key part of the quote. I am not taking a side on the issue one way or the other yet, until I know all of the facts.

The way I see it, if Mangini is not lying and the team did not sanction such activities after practice, then the injury was brought on by the players themselves and there is no fault for the coaching staff. At this point, it becomes a complete non- issue.

The other option of course is that Mangini is lying, that he not only condoned but enforced such activities. At this point I think we have a big issue and I lose a lot of trust and respect for my coach.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 12, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No Worries...

It just seemed as if you weren’t surprised at a Steeler fan for whatever behavior you thought you saw.

And I guess I may not have made myself 10)% clear. I’m not saying holding rookie and younger player only practices after the other practices is illegal. It might be very beneficial. And it may be that these practices ae more cerebral than physical, maybe doing walk throughs on plays, slower examples of how to block properly, or get past n O-lineman…that type of stuff. We don’t know. Maybe it is, and one player acted like an idiot and got all excited and blasted someone, and that was Davis on the wrong end.

My issue is that it is not, as you put it, something outside the jurisdiction or responsibilty of the coaches. The coaches are expected to maintain order. In a good, structured situation, coaches have order. Period.

So either way, Mangini is ultimately responsible. I am merely calling out to you Browns fans, and asking a simple question: Do you feel comfortable with someone like Mangini, and how he has thus far led your team, in guiding it to excellnce in the future.

(Let’s not forget the whole idiotic, illogical move to not name your teams starting QB before the season started. Wow. Exactly the type of flawed, non-footbll savvy moves from a mind that does not seem connected to how the NFL really works.)

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 12, 2009 7:57 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

We don’t know

by Nuts4359 on Oct 12, 2009 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My general opinion is that a coach’s control can only go so far. The more control he puts on the players outside of practice, the less receptive they become to his totalitarian type rule. Hopefully, if the incident went down how the Player’s Association claims, that it was not something Mangini was overseeing. I do not agree that in every circumstance should it become Mangini’s responsibility.

As for your other question, I agree with Nuts below….we don’t know enough yet. I think Mangini is a better coach than Crennel (which isn’t saying much), but he has a lot to prove still.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 12, 2009 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

To be honest, I am not comfortable with him running the team. This incident is not good. Whether it was an accident or an over zealous player drilling Davis. Mangini is the head coach and is responsible. His response is like a politician, not a football coach. You think he would of learned from New York with his dealings with the media there, but I don’t think so. I listen to WFAN everyday, I listened to many of Mangini’s press conferences, hell you could change New York with Cleveland and get the same thing.

by Grockcubs on Oct 13, 2009 8:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess that's what hit me too...

His response WAS like a politician’s. From a legal standpoint, I’m sure the way he responded was appropriate. But we’re not looking at Davis suing the Browns. We’re loking at the NFL looking into the matter. So I would say being as transparent and honest as possible would endear me to the team, the fans, etc. Maybe I’m just naive there, but the “political-ese” he was speaking was discouraging to see.

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 15, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is a little annoying sometimes. Mangini and Kokinis always refer to something as “internal business” if they don’t want to discuss it. As a fan, I want to know everything possible about the team, but I also understand why they do it.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 15, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So what exactly is the point of this post?
Thanks for your concern.?.?

but no, no, you are right. Now, because of your infinite Steelers-fan wisdom I can see the guiding light of true front office form from which my eyes have been blinded! All these years, have made me unable to see problems with the Browns as they happen. Thank you, wise one, now I will fire Mangini and hire a Steelers fan- for only those fans of the good teams know thy football game better than us mere peasant fans!

I hate when someone says something like- I’m asking your opinion- followed by something like- let’s not forget my opinion which I take as fact.

Have the balls to call your smack talk smack talk, buddy.

by L Train on Oct 12, 2009 8:04 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Have the balls to reply in an educated manner to a post that was actually started and finished with comliments.

See, it’s fans like you that want to get a reaction. Not going to get one from me, at least not the reaction you’re baiting me into. You’re about as bad as the reporter’s trying to bait T.O. the other week.

I’m asking a question, which is legitimate. It’s not smack talk. It seems like most things to you are either smack talk or not smack talk…one or the other, black or white. Because I am a hated, dreaded scum of the earth Steeler fan, nothing I say can be valid. I get it.

But read the whole post, realize it’s not bashing, and quit being fanatical.

fa⋅nat⋅i⋅cal  /fəˈnætɪkəl/ [fuh-nat-i-kuhl] –adjective
motivated or characterized by an extreme, uncritical enthusiasm or zeal, as in religion or politics (or sports, more than likely Browns v2.0 fan “L-Train”)

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 12, 2009 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You want to hate us hmm? OK!

started and finished with comliments? read much moron?
someone wanted to hate the Browns, now their upset about it. Boo hoo. This is what you want, to hate us. I’m helping YOU out.

Here’s some more help:
Pittsburgh’s women are ugly. Your best hockey player will be a one time champ/ homosexual once Ovie takes his place. Even THIS YEAR the Indians are a superior team to the Pirates as always. And come June you’ll be explaining to everyone about how you’ve been a lifelong Cavs fan, no really.
Plus your city smells and all of your best players have come from Ohio, with the exception of one, Bradshaw, who can’t even spell Otto Graham’s alma mater on paper. If it wasn’t for some shame expansion franchise known as the Browns the record books would show a clear cut dominance over your team through the ages.

by L Train on Oct 12, 2009 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

please stop. I didn’t see anything wrong with his post. It wasn’t malicious or degrading.

by talonk on Oct 12, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

1) Read MY original post. It starte and ended with compliments.

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 12, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like your brethren with a good head said...

My original post was neither malicious, degrading, or rude. Unlike yours. :)

But in response to your post:
1) I read a TON. In fact, I am not sure, but from what I can tell from the differences in our posts, I may read on a little higher level than you. And with that being said, I am very sure there are many Browns fans that can read on a higher level than myself. So your comment…?

2) No help needed from a fanatic of a team which is a natural and historical rival. I hate them justthe same, but find it hard, as your team sucks pretty hard right now. This is not a malicious, mean, harsh statement; just how it is. I want your team to be better. You don’t seem to be able to grasp tha. It’s kind f funny to watch you chasing your tail, actually.

3) The girls from where I’m from would…no, WILL…without question make your ladies there look utterly DAWGLY. I live in California, and I think I can speak for even yourself…damn, you wish you were here. If you disagree, then you obviously have not been here. I’m sure you have nice looking girls there. We just have more, of every type. Come out and visit sometime. You won’t get any, especially if you say you’re from Cleveland…but you’ll want to stay.

4) Lifelong Lakers fan. You may kneel and bow to the current reigning champions when you take a break from drooling over your “King” poster.

5) Did you really reference baseball? Wow..hahaha…

6) Bradshaw…well, thankfully spelling Otto Graham’s high schoool alma mater wasn’t a requirement each time he picked up a Super Bowl ring…that could have been embarrassing! (*sidenote: Bradshaw has written several books. Have you written a book? He knows enough to get by in life. I’ll take that ovur nowing how too spel anee daey!

7) Browns / left / old version / new version / dominance / etc. OK. If you say so. :)

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 12, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mission accomplished! And I love when people reference the compensation capital of the world Southern Cal as their fall back. I used to live in Studio City, moved to NYC- you wish your girls looked like these! And I’ll take another guess that Mr. LakerSteelr fan is also a Yankees fan to complete the full level of 70’s/80’s bandwagon doucheness.
AND YOU DON"T KNOW WHO BOMBED PEARL HARBOR. moron.

by L Train on Oct 12, 2009 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude. Shut up. If anyone is a moron here, it’s you. I mean seriously? You can’t type one intelligent comment if your life depended on it. Whenever I see you make a comment, it’s based on weak allegations that the certain postee’ is of a lower level than you. You’re really everything a Browns fan isn’t. Just because he posts on SC more than DBN, doesn’t mean you have to verbally attack him. Please, stop posting. I’d rather have mooncamping than your idiotic comments.

by SpecialBrownie on Oct 13, 2009 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

PLEASE

First off I can’t stand the Steelers, they make me ill. Call out the Pengins who have won what 3 Cups, and to say the Browns dominated the Steelers prior to 1999 is just ridiculous. They have owned the Browns ass period.
 To get personal is child like.

by Grockcubs on Oct 13, 2009 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What the hell stats are you looking at, it took TEN YEARS of winning every single game for the Squeelers to TIE us in the overall win-loss, and even now, are only up on us by what, 3 or 4 wins? Get your facts straight. Funny I just looked on CB.com and it says the Browns and Steelers are 55-55 and that you have 2 playoff victories over us. I believe my friend that you just got OWNED

by North Coast Flea on Oct 13, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

44—20 last 32 years, thats what I am looking at. Goodness I love the Browns and hate the Steelers, but they have multiple rings and we can’t even get there, there is no comparison, none. OWNED hardly.

by Grockcubs on Oct 13, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

saying they have rings and we don’t really bothers me. We haven’t won a super bowl, but I believe we’ve won 4 nfl championships. just because they were called something different doesn’t mean they don’t count.

by notthatnoise on Oct 14, 2009 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

try 8 championships (4 nfl, 4 aafc)

by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 14, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yup, more championships than the Steelers.

by Ryan Kelsey on Oct 14, 2009 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m pretty sure that’s actually second in the league for NFL teams with the most league championships. (Green Bay has 9 NFL, 3 SB)

by Simmsinns on Oct 14, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think GB has 12 and Chicago has 9.

by talonk on Oct 14, 2009 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are correct, Bears have 8 NFL, and 1 SB. That would make us third.

by Simmsinns on Oct 14, 2009 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

1964, I was alive anyone else? 45 years and counting.

by Grockcubs on Oct 14, 2009 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

good one, Frustration, just years of it. This whole Quinn thing has me even more frustrated

by Grockcubs on Oct 14, 2009 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I feel for you, but I guess at least you were alive for a title!

by Roger Dorn on Oct 14, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey buddy I may be from Cleveland but my woman is from Shittsburgh and is not ugly, and yes I hate everything about this city but her.

by North Coast Flea on Oct 13, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

She hates the city too.

by North Coast Flea on Oct 13, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

meaning you think our coach and organization is a joke, got it.
thanks, Steeler fan, we’ll take it under advisement.

by L Train on Oct 12, 2009 8:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

At this present time our coach and team, well, it is sadly a joke. Hate to be honest.

by Grockcubs on Oct 13, 2009 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ask cincinatti and buffalo how much of a joke we are

by notthatnoise on Oct 14, 2009 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your organization will be judged...

…solely on the fruit of its labors.

The reason a team exists in the NFL is to win. Period. Thus, “WINS” or “LOSSES” are the fruit of the teams labor. That team is classified as starting from everyone from the vendors at the stadium, the medical staff, the coaches, players, and at the top, the front office and ownership.

What I think about your team is largely irrelevant. But, if I knew nothing about football whatsoever, and were to read about the NFL and it’s recent 20 year history, I would in fact think your organization is a joke.

As a fan of the Steelers-Browns rivalry, though, I do in fact hope your ownership gets its act in order and puts a good team on the field.

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 12, 2009 8:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Won’t happen overnight.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 12, 2009 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

see, I knew you would get there. This is what you wanted to say the whole time, and tried to church it up and dig at us a little more, if even just subconsciously. The only thing your post was about was trying to show a superiority of both your team, and even more so, yourself. This whole thing wreaks of ‘look how superior my football knowledge is because my team is good, I can use notations, so I’m smart too’.

Hate us yet. Scum Steelers fan.

by L Train on Oct 12, 2009 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

by the way, if this had happened with the Texans or the Packers, the press wouldn’t have said squat about it. But since the Browns, and Mangini, have been the media’s punching bag for years, this gets national pub.

by talonk on Oct 12, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just my opinion, and I have lived in different parts of the country...

…But the national media generally gravitates towards what they deem relevant, and that goes for punching bags, as well.

I just don’t see the Browns being the medias punching bags. The other NFL franchises, well, that’s another story.

But to be honest, the Packers took quite a bit of hate regarding the perception thatthey drove out a 1st ballot Hal of Famer who holds most of the NFL’s passing records. And the Texans, shoot, aren’t they nearly as old as the Browns v2.0? Yet they did not get a pass, even from their own fans, regarding the “debacle” that was drafting Mario Williams over Reggie Bush.

What the Texans showed is that they made the right decision, AND got their tiny little productive running back in Slaton. The Packers showed they could free up that cap space, ride the arm of some green commodity already in-house named Aaron Rodgers, and try to patch their holes. Both franchises have been vilified, for the most part.

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 15, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

First off, equating the drafting of Williams over Bush and the deprature of Favre is a little silly.

What my reference was, if the 6th round draft pick from the Texans/Packers this year, got hurt like this, it would barely have gotten a mention in the local area for both those towns.

But because Mangini has a bad rep (mural – which was a non-story, water bottle fine, etc) this story gets national news.

Re the Browns: The whole staph infection issue has gotten national pub even though every other team has had similar cases. It’s like ESPN and the NFL want the Browns to fail for whatever reason (and I know that seems like stretching it).

by talonk on Oct 15, 2009 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I actually read a piece by Michael Smith saying that Williams over Bush was the right thing for the Texans to do around the time they announced that was what they were going to do.

by rufio on Oct 16, 2009 2:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

“We did have Mario Williams on top of the board. There’s just so many big players with rare size and speed like he had. 6’6”, 295 pounds, ran a 4.7 — I know I hadn’t seen anything like that at the combines to even compare him with. There are just so many big guys on the planet, as the late George Young used to say, when you get an opportunity to get one like this, you figure you’re getting a defensive end that’s going to be there pressing the quarterback for 10 years. I think the fans just gotta wait just a little bit longer because this guy’s on his way. I see him as a better player than he was last year and I think there’s a lot of good in front of this guy."

— Bill Parcells

by golanbatrac on Oct 16, 2009 8:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

this is all false. you cited ONE story for each other team, both of which had people in the national media on each side. A lot of people liked what the packers did, and at the time there was a sizable group of people that knew reggie bush wasn’t some uber-player.

The browns on the other had have stories made up about them. Off the top of my head:
The James davis incident WAS NOT team sanctioned
The mural was moved to a more prominent place in the facility, not removed
The fine wasn’t for a water bottle, it was for multiple incidents.

by notthatnoise on Oct 16, 2009 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The browns on the other had have stories made up about them. Off the top of my head:
The James davis incident WAS NOT team sanctioned
The mural was moved to a more prominent place in the facility, not removed
The fine wasn’t for a water bottle, it was for multiple incidents.

We still have no idea about the James Davis injury. We have heard a lot of maybes so far. Nothing has been made up.
I don’t care about a mural. At all.
The fine incident has been he-said-she-said so far. We have no idea.

It is crazy to blame the media for “making stories up” until we actually know what happened.

by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 16, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The fine is actually pretty clear cut to me. Abram Elam said the water bottle fine did not happen. Chris Mortensen reported that the 1700 was a collection of fines all on Braylon Edwards for multiple team rule violations.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 16, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s cool, I just trust Mortensen zero. I personally think that he is a tool used by coaches to get their agenda out.

But I do see where you are coming from.

by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 16, 2009 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You give Mortensen more credit that I do. I just think he makes things up based on assumptions and other people’s stories. Seriously, I think he is totally dishonest.

by Ryan Kelsey on Oct 20, 2009 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I view him as a parrot. If a coach wants to get his side of the story out (think water-bottle-gate) then he tells Mort what to say. Mort does what he is told, working towards that always elusive “scoop”. Jay Glazer usually does the same, just for players, hence he is usually getting the good stories. I think that Adam Schefter is easily the best in the biz. He is no ones errand boy and he gives it to you straight, just what I want from my reporting. Casserly I wonder about just due to the fact that he wants back in. He could be kissing some asses with his reporting.

Mort gives more bad leads than ANYONE, let alone with the access he has, should. Say what you want about Florio at PFT, but he gets a lot more right than he misses. Remember Mort promising that Vick would never be indicted, or the guarantee that Ron Rivera would be the next Cowboys head coach? Or when he reported that Eli Manning would miss a month last season. Eli didn’t miss a start. Or that Percells to Atlanta was a done deal.

I am sure that every reporter gets one story wrong once in awhile, but good Lord Mort misses a ton. He has always been Parcells bitch too.

by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 20, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am pretty sure the PD reported the mural was taken down before they knew what happened.

It wasn’t made up, but it definitely wasn’t the whole truth either. If you think that’s responsible reporting, you are kidding yourself.

Grossi and Cabot have a clear anti-Mangini bias because he gives them so little information and they like to whine about it instead of accepting that it will make the Browns a better football team and then speculating in a responsible manner.

by rufio on Oct 16, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I very rarely go to local reporting to get my Cleveland Browns info for the simple fact that you listed. I have seen some pretty shaddy things go down when it comes to local media.

But I have never seen or heard or someone making up a complete story.

And maybe I missed it, but I don’t remember anything about a mural (not saying that your points aren’t valid, it’s just that I don’t remember.)

by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 16, 2009 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok, i should have been more clear, thats my fault. I didn’t literally mean made up, i just meant exaggerated and twisted to look bad for the browns. also this is in response to another post but we do know about the james davis situation. what he was doing was not condoned by the coaching staff. it really can’t get much simpler than that. also the mural was from right when mangini took over he moved a mural to a different place and the media (including yahoo and espn) immediately said he took it down because he didn’t value browns history

by notthatnoise on Oct 17, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

this is in response to another post but we do know about the james davis situation. what he was doing was not condoned by the coaching staff.

What I have read is that Davis hurt himself during one of the coaching staffs “opportunity sessions”. That to me sounds like someone on the coaching staff was there, unless James Davis ripped off his pads in mid-play/session. I have a hard time believing that. So do they “condone” it? No, someone got hurt for a stupid reason. That doesn’t mean that someone on the coaching staff is to blame.

That person should already have been fired.

by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 17, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It could have been one coach supervising/coaching on several drills, and they players could have done something or there could have been confusion about something (whether or not to hit the guy at full speed, etc.) in a drill the coach wasn’t directly involved with.

Again, I can’t imagine any coach would ever actively promote or supervise this type of thing in the NFL.

by rufio on Oct 19, 2009 2:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i can only write this so many times but mangini himself said this was something they would never condone. until you show me evidence otherwise i’m going to take his word for it.

by notthatnoise on Oct 19, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mangini also said Brett Favre was healthy.

Mangini has a history of lying to cover his ass.

A staple of the Bilichick tree.

by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 19, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

They reported he had the mural/tribute in the Berea facility taken down.

He did, he just had it taken down and then moved to a more prominent place in the facility. The PD reported the story as fact before they knew the whole truth.

This was reported during the very beginning of Mangini’s new regime, when he wasn’t talking to the media yet. I can’t find it on cleveland.com, but I can find lots of places where Mangini explains what happened during what I believe was his first presser.

by rufio on Oct 19, 2009 2:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Posnanski wrote about it and claims the mural was ruined in the transfer, so that nothing has been put up anywhere.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 19, 2009 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Either way, I don’t care about a mural.

by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 19, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Same here, but I am afraid of getting called out for being a Mangini apologist again.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 19, 2009 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then the PD reported it multiple times before the story really came to fruition.

by rufio on Oct 19, 2009 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The post was veiled as the latest Browns fans deserve more article. Come on! It’s Steelers week! So what if we have no chance! Did we give up when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? We don’t need other team’s fans pointing out the problems we all see, ESPECIALLY Steelers fans, on Steelers week! It’s time to rally up, get excited, cause itsany given Sunday in this league, and ration and reason hasn’t stopped us from barking yet!
(Insert the “Yeah, Dad, get your balls back!” clip from Talledega Nights, followed by the National Anthem)
What would your motivation be to write a fanpost at the Ravens blog if they had a lot of problems? Shear concern? Please.
Let’s defend our Browns Fandom, this rivalry, and call a spade a spade and not feel bad for upsetting a Pittsburgh fan.

by L Train on Oct 12, 2009 8:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Dude, your own fellow fan asked you to shut it. You're embarrassing yourself.

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 12, 2009 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Browns apathy effects us all. Not me. Not this week.

by L Train on Oct 12, 2009 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Obviously. Bark away.

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 12, 2009 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I had no idea...

The Browns were there at Pearl Harbor.

And seriously, you’re about as far away from upsetting me as a person could be. I don’t get upset about people I’ve never met insulting me or trying to get me mad on the internet. Doesn’t flow both ways, though, apparently. :)

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 12, 2009 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

so you were upset I implied that the Browns were at Pearl Harbor, not that I said the Germans bombed it? Its all comedy and good fun, trying to rally everyone out of the apathetic state their in.

by L Train on Oct 12, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

is “shear concern” a scissor phobia type thing?

by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 14, 2009 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The sheep are nervous.

by golanbatrac on Oct 14, 2009 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm pretty sure "Shear Concern" is that new mullet place over on 45th and Johnson.

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 15, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is far too long for me to read. If it came from a regular contributor to this site, maybe. Sometimes less is more.

by rufio on Oct 12, 2009 8:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

So you're saying if L-Train over here wrote a piece...

…you’d read it because he’sa regular contributor?

Think maybe you should open up your parameters there, Rufio. :)

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 12, 2009 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If it was as long and confusing as yours looked upon first glance, probably not.

by rufio on Oct 13, 2009 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll be sure to use smaller words and include pictures next time, just for you, Rufio. :)

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 15, 2009 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sounds good.

by rufio on Oct 16, 2009 2:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Browns Fans:

At least the rational ones…

(L-Train you may have a seat).

This was definitely not aimed at upsetting you, or degrading you, or mocking you. If you read it for wht it is, you can see that pretty easily. I won’t be responding to anyone who wants to have a anly e-fight. Save that for your World of Warcraft buddies if that is you.

If I wanted to be mean, believe me, and you know this…I could have been a reall ass.

Looking forward to this week.

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 12, 2009 8:57 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i really don’t get what your point is. you are trying to say our front office and coach may have done something sleazy, when all evidence points to it being a non-issue, or at the worst something espn framed as an issue.

after this is pointed out to you, you say we missed the point, then restated the same thing.

please, for those of us that are slow, what is your point?

by notthatnoise on Oct 12, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well

58 post was fine, now your arrogance and smugness is shining through. We as Brown fans know where we are at, and the sight is not pretty. Years of neglect will do that. I am not a fan of Mangini however he needs a chance.
 So to get general “concern” and just want “insight” from a Steeler fan well thanks but no thanks.

by Grockcubs on Oct 13, 2009 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What exactly was the point of this, besides stirring up some mud over what at this point is unfortunate nonissue? I think you protest too much.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Oct 14, 2009 3:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

it was all in good fun. but seriously, we can see everything that everyone else does.

by L Train on Oct 12, 2009 9:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

A die hard Steelers fan shows up just before we play the Steelers and goes over all of the Browns’ problems. He never mentions any of the Steelers’ problems. Then, he defends himself from baiting by claiming that he came here to discuss league issues. This is classic overcompensating.

by elsandito on Oct 12, 2009 10:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Actually...

…as Kwoog (posted below) wrote, and even copied part of my post, THAT is why I wrote the original article. I summed it up in one sentence, actually:

"I’m writing this because, I fear, you have a Belicheck disciple that is more "Belicheat" than "Belicheck." I’m not sure the integrity is there to be a solid spine for your football team to lead you into the future success you are hoping for.

I’m intereseted in knowing your thoughts."</strong.

Yes, I’m a die-hard Steelers fan, caught me, but I didn’t try to hide that. :) But believe me, I did NOT go over ALL of the Browns problems, just what I am beginning to percieve as one of them.

And as for not stating any of the Steelers problems, hey…I already had one of your posters complain to me that my article was too long and complicated looking. We can save the Steelers problems for another post, and believe me, we do have some. Thankfully, though, as I see it the problems are not with the Steelers front office or coaches, so this makes solving them a tad easier.

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 15, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m writing this because, I fear, you have a Belicheck disciple that is more “Belicheat” than “Belicheck.” I’m not sure the integrity is there to be a solid spine for your football team to lead you into the future success you are hoping for.

I’m intereseted in knowing your thoughts.

In a word, I agree. I definitely lean towards “homer” as a fan of sports (I loathe the day Savage was fired, think Quinn could be a good/great QB and I still love Shapiro for the Indians). However, the Mangini regime is the first overhaul of a Cleveland sports team that I was not excited about. Almost everything that has transpired since his hiring has justified my apprehensions. In all honesty, my fanship has waned a bit, and I am simply waiting out the end of this doomed regime. I know Mangini isn’t going to win a Super Bowl in Cleveland. That takes a lot of excitement out of being a Browns fan for me. I’m glad you love to hate us for all the right reasons (and vice versa, backatcha), but I’m sorry to say you and I both have at least another 5-7 years, minimum, for that to happen (2 more years of Mangini failing, then another 4 for the hypothetical “Good” subsequent regime to turn it around).

www.lowbrowsophisticate.com

by kwoog on Oct 13, 2009 8:14 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I’m disappointed in the fact that Lerner really likes Belicheck disciples. I’d rather pull from the Falcons organization or something. Just any other organization than Belicheck’s!

by SpecialBrownie on Oct 13, 2009 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Falcons hired Thomas Dimitroff who was a Piolo/Patriots disciple.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 13, 2009 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well in defense, Pioli isn’t a “disciple” I would have been pumped if we brought him here. But I like to think that the way Belicheck mentors his coaches is different than people from the organization. Know what I mean?

by SpecialBrownie on Oct 13, 2009 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

pioli is absolutely a belichick disciple. no question.

by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 14, 2009 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Shouldn’t take 4 years to turn around a team in the NFL.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 13, 2009 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Maybe for one year. But any quality, stable, consistently winning organization takes at least that, and most likely much longer.

Consistency = Success in the NFL. I’d say consistency is even more important than FO “talent” in most cases (ie, the 32nd worst football FO in the world will be more successful over 10 years than a franchise that keeps firing and rehiring inside of 3-5 years looking for “the one”).

www.lowbrowsophisticate.com

by kwoog on Oct 13, 2009 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still don’t really agree. If you are talking about creating one of the best teams in the league, I think it might take a year or two, but you really in the end just need to luck out on a franchise player moreso than develop a team over a 4 year period.

The Colts and Pats became top tier teams by drafting Brady and Manning, not by rebuilding the correct way over a 4 year span.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 13, 2009 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

True, when you manage to get lucky enough to draft one of the greatest of all-time at the most important position. They may often have an immediate impact (Matt Ryan) but you still want to build around them (Michael Turner, Tony Gonzalez).

There is also the case where you draft a HOF QB (Manning), then go on to draft a damn good WR (Reggie Wayne) 3 years later. You can either put this on their god given talent, or the coaching staffs ability to develop players. I for one, think it is a combination of both, mostly the former.

by Simmsinns on Oct 13, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Colts have consistently drafted well on offense. Have drafted pretty well on defense, too, but mostly because the FO knows exactly what their coaches want(ed), knows how to evaluate which players fit those molds, and has a good strategy in terms of overall team composition (Lean on a HoF QB, build a sick-nasty offense around him, then find under-valued pass defenders/fast players on D).

If they tried to build a dominant D and put a porous line in front of Peyton, while giving him lazy, me-first receivers, Peyton would have gotten frustrated and left.

They are developing talent, but they consistently draft offensive players early and often so that if one of them fails, they’re ok. They are familiar with their organization’s model for building a winning team.

If I’m not mistaken, Miami did that pretty well in one year.

by rufio on Oct 13, 2009 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, I don’t consider a HOF QB a prerequisite for a consistently being one of the “best” (top 10) teams in the league. Titans, Broncos, Ravens, Steelers, Eagles, etc.

www.lowbrowsophisticate.com

by kwoog on Oct 13, 2009 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Titans 0-5. Broncos missed playoffs the last few years if I am not mistaken.

Ravens missed the playoffs the year before they got a competent QB. Steelers and Eagles are what I would call “set at QB” even if those guys aren’t HOFers, they are both really good.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 13, 2009 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Set at QB is almost certainly a prerequisite, but Roethlisberger and McNabb are far cries from Peyton and Brady. The titans start is an aberration, I’m talking about teams whose fans rightfully expect to make it to the playoffs every single year. Those teams have been that way for over a decade, and it’s because of stability.

www.lowbrowsophisticate.com

by kwoog on Oct 14, 2009 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i disagree 100%. those teams have most certainly not been that way for a decade. the steelers have 4 losing seasons in the 10 seasons before 2009, the titans have 4 losing seasons plus an 8-8 season (remember when they were bad enough to draft vince young?), the eagles have 4 losing seasons, and the broncos have been the most successful, having 2 losing seasons and 2 8-8 seasons. So I would not consider being bad 40% of the time expecting to make the playoffs for well over a decade.

by notthatnoise on Oct 14, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think kwoog is saying that those teams could reasonably set “make the playoffs” as an achievable goal every year for about a decade.

I’m not sure I would include the Titans on that list, but they are a good organization, IMO.

When a team like the Eagles or Broncos doesn’t have a winning season it is a disappointment—as in “below expectations”. It happens (as you point out), but it is below their realistic expectations.

If we sniff 8-8, that’s above our expectations just about every year.

by rufio on Oct 14, 2009 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly.

www.lowbrowsophisticate.com

by kwoog on Oct 14, 2009 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In the 10 Years Before 2009...

How many AFC Championships did the Steelers play in?
How many Super Bowls did they win?

EVERY team has a down year where they miss the playoffs. EVERY. The Steelers were winning division titles and going deep into the playoffs, & winning Super Bowls more often than not the 10 years before this season. And in every year, they were not a speed bump “easy win” on any teams schedule. You always know you played the Steelers. Call it what you want, but…we can’t be compared to the Titans, or even the Broncos.

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 15, 2009 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

my point is it was barely more often then not. it was only 6-4. And believe me, at least one year they were a rollover team, i mean the expansion browns beat them in ’99 right?

by notthatnoise on Oct 16, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think the Titans are an abberation actually largely because of bad QB play which kind of proves my point.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 14, 2009 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I tend to agree with you in the case of the Titans, but the loss of Haynesworth complicates things there. He is about as important to a defense as a QB is to an offense.

 The Titans won with D and the running game last year. Take away half of that equation and its a lot harder to win.

by rufio on Oct 14, 2009 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea, but it leads back to the point of the Titans really have not been all that successful and I would say a large part of that is they have never had an above average QB. Get one of those, and you might see consistent winning.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 14, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, the Titans haven’t had competent QBing this season. That’s good enough, and many organizations prove it. Eli Manning, Roethlisberger, Dilfer, Johnson have all one “recent” SBs. Rex Grossman went to one (and btw, I’d add the Bears to my list).

www.lowbrowsophisticate.com

by kwoog on Oct 14, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

come on. eli and ben are an entirely different story than dilfer, b. johnson and the sex cannon (rex).

the consistent contenders have above-average to great qb’ing consistently.

by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 14, 2009 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

All of this started in response to:

I still don’t really agree. If you are talking about creating one of the best teams in the league, I think it might take a year or two, but you really in the end just need to luck out on a franchise player moreso than develop a team over a 4 year period.

The Colts and Pats became top tier teams by drafting Brady and Manning, not by rebuilding the correct way over a 4 year span.

I’m contending it doesn’t take luck. If you have a stable organization for a long enough time, no luck is involved. Ie, you don’t have to luck out on picking #1 when a Manning QB is available, or find a diamond HoF QB in the 6th round. A smart, consistent organization that is competitive for the playoffs (almost) every year can only be built after many years of good decisions, not just lucking out in getting a good QB at some point. I know that’s more simplistic than Dorn’s actual stance, but my point is about consistent winning. I have no desire for a Miami of 08 year. I want a PGH/Balt/PHL/Chi decade.

www.lowbrowsophisticate.com

by kwoog on Oct 15, 2009 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, by luck I meant getting an above average QB. The term luck probably wasn’t the best one, but seeing how many high draft pick QBs fail, I would say it takes a bit of luck. My largest point was about the need for an above average QB to have a consistent winner.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 15, 2009 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

fair enough. i agree that when you build a team the right way over time, you’ve got a chance to be competitive every year (see: baltimore, chi). then those years when you become championship caliber are the years that you get a great qb or a great qb performance…and when that qb performance goes away, you can still be competitive (see: philly). obviously, there are exceptions (balt, tb), but i’m with you.

by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 15, 2009 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eli Manning is a great QB.

by TheRealSlimShady on Oct 16, 2009 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, he isn’t.

by Ryan Kelsey on Oct 20, 2009 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

They have the same QB...

…and the same o-line, and the same offense, for themost part. They even got a cool new toy at WR, who’s doing quite well. So I don’t think you can blame it on poor QB play. Heck, the QB isn’t even asked to win games there! They have the Neil O’Donnel of Nashville!

I think they miss their defensive coordinator, who, by the way, happens to be doing quite well in his new environs. :)

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 15, 2009 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

consistent elite-level performance is dependent upon very good-to-great qb play.

by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 14, 2009 1:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Best point I’ve read on this site.

For competently run teams, it doesn’t take 4 years to turn things around.

Last night I watched a well played game between two quality teams, the Jets and Dolphins. It breaks my heart to think that outside of a couple half-season runs, there has been nothing from this team since they came back in the league. NOTHING!

Things may (have to?) improve, but at the moment, we are grouped with the Bills, Rams, Raiders, Chiefs and Lions of the world.

AHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

by Pruitt on Oct 13, 2009 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that jets team is largely mangini built, by the way.

by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 14, 2009 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am with you kwoog, could not have said it better. Even thought I am not a Ohio or Cleveland resident, I was a Browns fan before any other major sport franchise, and this has been awhile. I just don’t have a good feel for this leadership. I will say to the day I die, Quinn got a raw deal here and he can be a good QB in this league. Goodness Chad Henne looked fine last night, Quinn could manage a game like that.

by Grockcubs on Oct 13, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The good subsequent regime? Is this the regime where a football man hires the head coach? Newsflash: There won’t be a good subsequent regime. We will have to find a way with a crappy regime.

by elsandito on Oct 13, 2009 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope you're not right....

…only in the time it takes to be back, though. As far as Mangini, I have to agree with you. And for Quinn, we need to see more of a body of work. Some (not all) in Steeler Nation were decrying the bust that was the Mendenhall draft pick, when he had not even started a full game. And currently, Sweed is on the hot seat. I am ofthe mind he can become a productive piece for the Steelers, but again, it comesc with reps. Quinn needs those.

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 15, 2009 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What this guy is saying is no different from what many other Browns fans are saying. So, on the face of it, I do not consider this to be smack talk.

However, .58, please respect those of us who respond that much of the stories are overblown hype by the media, especially the national media. They smell blood with Mangini and are circling him like buzzards. It also leads many to be very selective in quotes and spinning the story line. As is the case, Mangini has looked bad on many stories that have been later shown to be overblown or incorrect (the $1,700 water bottle anyone?). We can dismiss these stories as incorrect or fictional, but these stories still exist. So, at the end of the season, we will look back at all that has happened (including wins and losses) and pass judgment on him. That’s all we can do as fans. Calling for the coach’s head does not seem to be a good use of our time when he is just 5 games into his regime (one that has faced huge obstacles, like a depleted roster, malcontents, and the toughest schedule).

As of now, we are just taking names of all the writers and fans with their proclamations. When the dust clears, we will praise them for their foresight or castigate them for their idiocy.

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin

by Spidey on Oct 13, 2009 12:54 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well written, couldn't agree more.

And I have the utmost of respect for Browns fans. I think some of the perceived lack of such is due more to the fact that you are all a very sensitized bunch at the moment. I understand that, and really didn’t mean to come off in any way to poke at an already sore spot.

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 15, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We don’t mind discussion and even discussing the reality that our team has a long way to go. What we don’t appreciate is underhanded cheap shots pretending to be something else. (Not accusing you of such)

by Roger Dorn on Oct 15, 2009 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not taken that way

I’m sure there’s a lot of that coming from almost every angle for evry team. But when I come in to talk smack, you’ll know, I won’t camoflouge it. This was a serious queston to something I saw as standing in the way of actual Cleveland Browns progress.

Like I said, as a Steeler fan, I love the Steelers-Browns rivalry. It’s one of the richest, oldest, and at times most passionate in the NFL. I want to see it back to where I love to despise the Browns more than I despise the Ravens. But right now, I can’t.

(A side benefit to you usurping the Ravens: You’d be better than them, and for them, it would utterly destroy them to be #2 in the division. So please…make both of our days, Browns front office, and do the right things to come back!)

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 15, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

*make that #3...my bad. :)

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- #58

by __.58.__ on Oct 15, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

it’s way too early to dream about it, but how about us 1, you 2, Cincy 3 and Bal 4?? As long as you got a wild card … right?

Just kidding, won’t happen for a long time …..

by talonk on Oct 15, 2009 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

if you say you couldn’t agree more, then that implies you know its mostly overblown, media-created stories. If you know that, you know our front office isn’t a bunch of cheaters and liars. So that makes your OP completely irrelevant.

That probably comes off a little hostile, but i really don’t mean it to be. I’m just wondering how you reconcile what you said here with your original post.

by notthatnoise on Oct 16, 2009 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you know our front office isn’t a bunch of cheaters

Slow down there. Eric Mangini, no matter if you like him or not, is still a rat. These are my personal feelings, so feel free to disagree. He made his bones using NE tactics, and then narced them out for his own gain. Not cool.

by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 16, 2009 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rat ≠ Cheater.

Not saying Rat > Cheater, but still. Not the same thing.

by rufio on Oct 16, 2009 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You think that the Pats weren’t doing this when Mangini was there? How else would he have known to be on the lookout for it?

I have a hard time thinking the Pats started this after he left, and he was the one to figure it all out.

by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 16, 2009 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the pats were the ones who were stupid enough to continue an illegal practice after one of their former employees went to be the head coach of a division rival. if mangini hadn’t reported it, it would have been a dereliction of his jets duties.

by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 16, 2009 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just think it is a weak ass move to use something illegal to your benefit.

But when it is being used against you, you cry foul?

Can’t have it both ways.

by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 16, 2009 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

like someone said earlier, a rat is not the same as a cheater.

and i find nothing wrong with him telling on the pats. they were doing something illegal. whatever they got they deserved, regardless of how they got caught.

Also this is admittedly nitpicky, but mangini was the d-coordinator. they were stealing the other teams defensive signs, so mangini didn’t benefit at all.

by notthatnoise on Oct 17, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Defense benefits from the offense staying on the field.

by North Coast Flea on Oct 17, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Magini’s exact role in this whole thing is so nebulous, it seems hard to make any intelligent comments about it.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Oct 17, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

personally, I wouldn’t so much call him a cheater as much as I would say that he’s sneaky and underhanded

by North Coast Flea on Oct 17, 2009 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mangini Will Need to Step Up on This One

First of all, there is a very good chance that the report is an inaccurate jab related to his tough efforts on changing the culture of this woebegone franchise.

If this event truly occurred as reported – the individual responsible should step down. If Mangini was there and observing the practice – he should be held accountable. If not – I would support him staying – and firing the accountable individual. This should not be up for debate, as Kokinis (puppet?) or Lerner would be able to pull the tape. In an earlier presser on “opportunity time” Mangini stated they reviewed the tapes on opportunity time and it has contributed to players (like Ratliff) making the team.

by realmccoy on Oct 13, 2009 11:47 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i actually agree that whomever was responsible for the oversight of this particular incident should be relieved of his duties.

by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 14, 2009 1:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

so you want to cut james davis? he’s the one responsible after all. Don’t forget, this was not supported by the staff, so no one on the staff had anything to do with it. the blame here rests solely on the players involved.

by notthatnoise on Oct 14, 2009 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not So Fast My Friend

I am unsure if the presser is in the Browns vault or not – but he spent one of his first few training camp pressers expounding on the virtues of opportunity time. He stated that the time was used to balance reps (always a priority with Mangini) – and give guys a chance to make an impression and “pop” on tape. He went on further to state that when he was in NY that he would have cut Brett Ratliff if not for the fact that he tore it up during opportunity time. Someone was supervising those drills.

I am not a Mangini hater – and I think the overall concept of opportunity time is well founded. However, as a leader – the safety of players/employees should be the top priority.

by realmccoy on Oct 14, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do recall him discussing opportunity sessions. I still feel a lot depends on the supervision that goes on and what is deemed acceptable during these periods. It could still have been a case of the players doing things outside of team supervision.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 14, 2009 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If any coach said it was OK to have a fully padded LB hit a non-fully padded James Davis at full speed I would be very surprised, and he should be let go unless his name is Rob Ryan.

by rufio on Oct 14, 2009 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s almost impossible to believe the staff would sanction that, yet the media treats it like a near certainty.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 14, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i’ll try to find the link, but i think it’s been established that a coach was supervising. the players didn’t just do this on their own. and it is well-established that these “opportunity sessions” are managed by coaches…sometimes mangini himself.

by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 14, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do believe we have supervised “opportunity sessions.” I have yet to see anything that says a coach was overlooking the session in which Davis was hurt.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 14, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

‘opportunity sessions’ is my new favorite phrase.

by L Train on Oct 15, 2009 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is fairly amusing.

by Roger Dorn on Oct 15, 2009 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

unless you can find that link i will continue to believe eric mangini.

by notthatnoise on Oct 15, 2009 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

Start posting about the Browns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Th_clevelandbrowns-1-1-1_small
My Joe Montana Experience

Recent FanPosts

Brad_s_wheels_small
Draft projections???
Hector_rondon_small
Possible third-round QBs not named Tebow, McCoy, or LeFevour
Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
019_small
I Still Think The Browns Need A Veteran WR
Small
Info on Peyton Hillis
Small
Next Up on the Tradining block....
20051225mf_fbn_fan_takedownpj_450_small
Quinn and 2nd round pick to Broncos for Marshal
Troy_smith_small
About the Jake Delhomme acquisition.
4horsemen_small
Possible Mid round Sleepers.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Niners Nation
Golden Nuggets: Not very good company.
Turf Show Times
Random Ramsdom: 3/22/2010
Acme Packing Company
Diamond In The Rough: Anthony Levine

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

Report: Dolphins RB Ronnie Brown Arrested On Friday

Photo

Mike Holmgren On Jimmy Clausen: 'It Would Be Hard For Me To Take Him'

Photo link

Pacman Jones' Workout With Lions Reportedly Goes Well

More from SBNation.com >


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Moderators

Pryor_small Buckeye Brad