Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 143 Results: Winners, Losers, And Other Thoughts

Browns Get Leveled by Ravens in Pitiful 16-0 Monday Night Game

BALTIMORE RAVENS (5-4) WEEK 10 CLEVELAND BROWNS (1-8)
VS.
16 0


When I went to the Giants vs. Browns game Monday Night, the excitement running through my veins throughout the game was a euphoric feeling.

When I went to the Ravens vs. Browns game on Monday, there was a completely different feeling: emptiness. Since we're out of contention, I'm beyond the point where I feel "crushed" after a loss. I was very pleased with the performance of the defense, but the continued inept performance by the offense just left me blank.

Let's get to another sad review of the game...

WEEK 10 - BALTIMORE RAVENS VS. CLEVELAND BROWNS (COMPLETE GAME REVIEW)

GOAT OF THE GAME:

  • Brian Daboll: Seriously? That was the game plan you came up with in two weeks of preparation? The Ravens' defense, particularly due to their secondary, hasn't been great this season, and we didn't try testing them until there was less than 20 seconds on the clock. Instead, every play we ran played right into the strengths of the Ravens' defense.

AWARDING GAME BALLS:

  • Rob Ryan: To the opposite side of the spectrum, the game ball goes to Ryan. The Ravens had a decent drive early on when they missed a field goal, but after that, the Browns' defense really only gave up one touchdown. Part of that had to do with the Ravens not looking very impressive on offense either, but the Browns brought enough pressure throughout the game to rattle Joe Flacco, and Ray Rice didn't have a breakout game against us for once.

GENERAL THOUGHTS

    Capt
    "Take it! I don't know what the hell to do with it!"
  1. Short Throws All Day: It became annoying that the fans behind me kept bringing this up, but they were right. The only pass plays we were looking for all day were ones that were right at the line of scrimmage. On our first drive or two, I was excited about this -- the Ravens were playing a little off, and the throws played to Quinn's strengths.

    Then, as we started to run the same plays throughout the rest of the game, the Ravens kept creeping closer and closer to the line of scrimmage. No adjustments. Not a single one.

  2. Furrey Stumbling: I know that Mike Furrey isn't supposed to be a "catch and run" receiver, but there were two or three plays where he actually had some space to work with and he just stumbled to the ground. On a day where we couldn't do anything right, it became more frustrating to see us slip even when the Ravens finally were out of position.

  3. Running the Wildcat: I don't know how this came across on television, but every time we ran the Wildcat formation, the safeties were almost right on top of the line of scrimmage -- even closer than when Quinn would throw the ball. I guess it's asking too much in that situation to have Cribbs stand in the pocket and deliver a deep throw to someone like Mohamed Massaquoi, who would've had one-on-one coverage.
  4. Inside Linebackers: With both of our starting inside linebackers done for the year, Kaluka Maiava and David Bowens looked pretty good together. Bowens provided the pass rush, and Maiava made two tackles that stopped a receiver shy of a Ravens first down, which is something I didn't expect from the rookie.

  5. Production Means Nothing: So, I guess we're back to having a head coach who puts too much into the fact that Jerome Harrison isn't a great blocker. The 100+ yard performance he had against the Bengals this season, arguably our best offensive game of the season, doesn't factor into the mix. Not that I'm against Chris Jennings -- yet -- but I'm getting pissed that Harrison is getting the shaft yet again.
  6. Ray Rice's Pass: The Ravens picked the right time to do a passing play with RB Ray Rice. As soon as he was handed the ball, I knew a pass was coming because the whole offensive line rolled out but made sure they weren't beyond the line of scrimmage. The receiver was wide open, but Rice took an extra second before releasing the ball, allowing our defensive backs to catch up and break up the play.
  7. What Did the Shifts Accomplish? There were so many times during the game that our team would line up in one formation, and they we'd suddenly have three guys quickly shift to different positions. I guess that's what our offense worked on during the bye week, because it's the only thing we did effectively, albeit with no results, all game.
  8. Snap the Ball? After our shifts were occurring, the Ravens shifted their whole defense as well. There were times where we could've quickly snapped the ball to catch someone out of position, but that never happened.
  9. No Huddle Presence: Another thing the Browns -- or both teams rather -- implemented was the "no huddle approach." I don't mind the approach necessarily, but if you're play calling is atrocious and you still take awhile to snap the ball, it's not really accomplishing anything unique. Sure, maybe the Ravens can't substitute, but it's not like they were chasing us down on 20 yard gains every play.
  10. Reverse to Massaquoi: I haven't checked how it came off on television, but one of the few play calls I liked was the reverse to Massaquoi, because it tried to catch the defense off guard when usually it's just Cribbs who runs the ball. The Ravens read it perfectly though and were right up at the line to stop Massaquoi. Of course, that leads more to the point about Cribbs throwing the ball...
  11. The New Punter: Our new punter didn't shank any punts, which was a good thing. He doesn't have a great leg though, so if when we're backed up throughout the rest of the season, I'm expecting the scores to become even more ridiculous in favor of the opposition.
  12. Very Good Kick Coverage: I was impressed with how the Ravens handled their special teams duties of stopping Joshua Cribbs. They had their players quickly down the field, and usually pinned Cribbs in a situation where he had no where to go. On Cribbs' only good return of the day, Brady Quinn blew it with a pick.
  13. Quinn's Performance: The performance by Brady Quinn was very disappointing, but again I bring the problems back to the horrific playcalling. Why is it that when Derek Anderson plays, he gets to chuck it into the defense? Quinn should have the same "privileges." If he throws an interception, then fine -- at least we'll see evidence that he's not capable of it.
  14. Leveling Cribbs: Besides the hook-and-ladder play making no sense when we were down by two 8-point possessions, Joshua Cribbs was on the receiving end of a cheap shot. I didn't get a good look at the play live, because after I saw him lateral the ball with nobody but Robert Royal in the area, I had just stood up to make sure I had my gloves and hat with be before I left. Thankfully Cribbs appears to be okay, and the coaches are indicating he might play this Sunday against the Detroit Lions.
  15. Brownies: Where was Brian Robiskie again? The fans behind me kept saying "WE SHOULD GET THE BALL" after the Ravens' penalty on special teams, but they failed to realize that the five-yard penalty would not have netted a first-down for us. Last year, half the crowd stood the whole game due to all of the exciting plays. This year, the crowd was still standing, but it was because we would attempt a deeper throw, even if it looked god-awful.

Up next, the Browns will face the lowly Detroit Lions. I have no faith in the Browns offense, but the defense could very well deliver a performance similar to the Buffalo game for a win. Rookie QB Matthew Stafford has been prone to mistakes, and if our defense creates turnovers, a 6-3 type of game might be enough to win again.

Comment 52 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I am not convinced any of our WRs have run a post pattern since Edwards left.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 20, 2009 12:40 PM EST reply actions  

Hmmm… This’ll be worth looking for Sunday.

by golanbatrac on Nov 20, 2009 8:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Fine, I’ll say it….is it possible that these gameplans are, um, not entirely directed toward winning?

by dgcambridge on Nov 20, 2009 12:40 PM EST reply actions  

the offensive ones sure aren’t, but it would be ridiculous to think its on purpose.

by notthatnoise on Nov 20, 2009 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

no trying to lose, just not focused on winning. As in, let’s try to work on some things, try out some different ideas. If we lose, it’s a better draft position anyway.

by dgcambridge on Nov 20, 2009 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

i can see where you’re coming from on that, and in some cases you might be right, but i think at this point this team needs to win a few more games for the coaches to keep their jobs, so they’re probably focusing more on that.

by notthatnoise on Nov 21, 2009 8:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Some very good analysis and I agree with most if not all of what you’ve posted.
1. The points about shifting, the wildcat, and no huddle – I’d group these into one called “overcomplicated offense”. I think we are running way too many different formations with players having to shift gears and do completely different things than what they are accustomed to doing. On top of that, when we shift, or line up Quinn as receiver or Cribbs as QB there is just about 0% chance that anything extraordinary will occur. So the sum total of all that complexity in deceiving the opposition is a big zero.
2. The points about Quinn – I’ve been sort of down on Quinn all along, especially early on as I thought we had something better in Anderson. I just don’t know what to say about Quinn at this point. He seemed better last year but the ineptitude of our offense is so all-encompassing that I’m not sure we can single out Quinn as the main problem. I do think that Quinn’s weaknesses tend to magnify the other weaknesses present in the offense. The line seems to block worse for him, the receivers seem less open, the running game stalls more, play calling is more conservative, etc. I don’t know if any or all of this is conscious by the other players or Daboll but there is a marked difference. These problems could also be self-imposed, for example: he doesn’t use the pocket well, he looks at the rush more than he does down field which tends to make his throws late and receivers seem less open. Having said this I still think Quinn should be left in for the rest of the season to see if he can develop.
3. The points about the defense – I think this is a case in which you can say that the Browns offense obviously stressed the Browns defense and made their job a lot harder. Most of the success enjoyed by the Ravens as far as scoring opportunity was a direct result of poor play or mistakes by the offense. The Browns defense gave the offense momentum only to see the them squander it. If we win any more games this year it will be because of better defense and special teams play.
 

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Nov 20, 2009 1:49 PM EST reply actions  

Ha, I just noticed the caption under the Quinn picture. Nice job, Chris.

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 20, 2009 2:26 PM EST reply actions  

You know I have been a Quinn supporter throughout this whole debacle. And I must say He looks like he has just started playing QB in 7th grade. I understand all of the other factors, lack of skilled position players, the horrible play calling and the suspect O line on certain ocassions, but he really looks horrible.
 I mean it pains me to think that the Browns are going to have to invest in a QB again this draft or in free agency.

by Grockcubs on Nov 20, 2009 3:35 PM EST reply actions  

i feel the same way.

by emily522 on Nov 20, 2009 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know if it has been said elsewhere, but I would be in favor of sending the Cards one of our 3rd rounders for Leinhert.

It would enable us to draft elsewhere and get a young QB. Anyone else have any thoughts on that?

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 20, 2009 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

With Warner getting old though, will they trade Leinart? This seems like a Favre/Rodgers scenario to me.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 20, 2009 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

They’d want a first for Leinart, I’m sure.

by golanbatrac on Nov 20, 2009 8:33 PM EST up reply actions  

They won’t get that.

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 20, 2009 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree. But that’s what they’d want.

by golanbatrac on Nov 20, 2009 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I doubt the Cardinals believe that they can get a first rounder for Leinhert. I think that coaching staff has soured on him.

And if the Cards do want a 1st, Holmgren/Casserley/Santa hangs up the phone and carries on. I just think that 3rd rounder sounds good to me.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 21, 2009 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Now that I look at his contract, I’d stay as far away from Leinart as possible. He has a $15 million escalator in 2010 (already met), another escalator that raises his base salary to $8.5 million in 2010 (needs to have taken 70% of the snaps in any year — he started 12 games as a rookie, so maybe the Cards are on the hook for this one as well), and another escalator worth $11 million in 2011 that’s tied to an unidentified qualifier. That’s a lot of money for an unproven guy.

by golanbatrac on Nov 21, 2009 7:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Not that I wanted him in the first place.

by golanbatrac on Nov 21, 2009 7:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Good info. The Cardinals are going to have to start playing him soon.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 22, 2009 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve thought of a Leinart as a Quinn clone, only left handed. In other words, no thanks.

fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 20, 2009 10:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Ah, but is he the Quinn we thought we had, or the one we’ve seen this year?

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Nov 21, 2009 1:50 AM EST up reply actions  

For some, there isn’t that much of a difference.

fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 21, 2009 9:22 AM EST up reply actions  

No thanks on Leinart. People are speculating that McCoy will fall into the second round, I wouldn’t have an issue drafting him.

by Grockcubs on Nov 21, 2009 7:38 AM EST up reply actions  

McCoy = Doug Flutie

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 21, 2009 7:53 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t get that. Kiper Jr. compares him to Plummer, that is a little more accurate. I don’t know, I need to due some more homework. Robinson from OK St. is interesting.

by Grockcubs on Nov 21, 2009 8:04 AM EST up reply actions  

doug flutie was a decent-to-good quarterback, i’ll take that.

by notthatnoise on Nov 21, 2009 8:48 AM EST up reply actions  

yes, i didn’t intend it as a negative.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 21, 2009 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Personally I don’t like McCoy. I wish I had a real reason, I guess it more of a feeling. He has never really blown me away.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 21, 2009 5:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Same here. Glad someone agrees.

Author of the segment "A Brownie For Your Thoughts," on DBN. Check it out.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 21, 2009 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

i like mccoy, but then again i thought quinn would be great. so maybe i just can’t evaluate qbs properly lol.

by emily522 on Nov 21, 2009 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Leinhart would look just like Quinn in this offense: A deer in headlights.

by Western Reserve on Nov 21, 2009 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

It’s hard for me to assess the playcalling because Quinn was pathetic. I don’t recall any passes that were placed well. A screen pass that went 10 feet over Furrey’s head? And that wasn’t the only pass that completely missed the mark. His accuracy truly exemplifies the inability to hit the side of a barn.

ESPN did not show downfield patterns, so I don’t know if the WRs were kept within 10 yards or if any went deep. From what I could tell, Quinn simply would not throw it more than 5 yards downfield. I make that conclusion because whenever he did a 7-step drop, he always threw to a receiver behind the LOS. (are you telling me no WRs ran a pattern beyond the LOS?). I don’t think Paul Brown could have coached that offense to any points…

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin

by Spidey on Nov 20, 2009 4:17 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

His downfield throws were horribly embarrassing.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 20, 2009 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Indeed. Both of them.

by dgcambridge on Nov 20, 2009 4:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I was also trying to figure out if Quinn was checking down from the deep routes – as in, looking downfield, and then changing to someone near the line of scrimmage. Generally speaking, it didn’t seem like it – most of the plays seemed to be designed screens.

by dgcambridge on Nov 20, 2009 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Can’t blame Quinn because the playcalling was pathetic, can’t blame the playcalling because Quinn was pathetic, can’t blame the WRs because the QBs are terrible, can’t blame the QBs because the WRs are terrible.

This is a very, very, very bad offense.

fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 20, 2009 4:46 PM EST up reply actions  

As I said in the other thread, it is a combination horrible playcalling, QBing, and catching the football.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 20, 2009 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Being at the game, I didn’t see many deep routes. On the few deep routes I saw, Massauoi ran too close to the sideline and opposite the side Quinn was rolling to. It was a clearout pattern of one DB not even involved in the play.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Nov 20, 2009 5:58 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

No mention of how we lost the TD fielding 10 men on the play? I’m not saying we would have stopped them. But who knows.

by skipkirk on Nov 20, 2009 7:03 PM EST reply actions  

OMG did you guys read some of Daboll’s interview responses? Check out some of these gems.

“We’ll score as many touchdowns as we can this week [in Detroit].” —Good to know.

We’re going out there and working. It’s not like we’re not trying. . . . Again, good to know, Brian.

The system is a good system, but it hasn’t been productive to this point, so we’re going to keep at it." What the definition of insanity again? Something about doing the same thing over and over expecting different results?

“I go in every week wanting to do real well against any defense we play,” Another stunning revelation.

“We have to play well…. we have to play better than we’ve been playing.” (sigh)

“It’s not just Brady Quinn, it’s all of us…If we all start doing better, then he’ll look better.”

Anyone else had enough of this jackass?

http://www.nba.com/media/cavaliers/come_on_cavs.mp3

by johnnyphoenix on Nov 21, 2009 10:52 AM EST reply actions  

http://www.nba.com/media/cavaliers/come_on_cavs.mp3

by johnnyphoenix on Nov 21, 2009 10:55 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Better question: Has anyone NOT had enough of Daboll?

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Nov 21, 2009 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Probably not. I’d like to see him demoted rather than outright fired, though.

by golanbatrac on Nov 21, 2009 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

He can be demoted to ‘get back’ coach, but we’d probably see a significant decrease in ‘get backing’ then.

http://www.nba.com/media/cavaliers/come_on_cavs.mp3

by johnnyphoenix on Nov 21, 2009 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

We would just have players wandering all over the field at all times. Like a little league baseball game.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 21, 2009 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

It's A Long Way...

….from the team in the mid to late ’80s. I am really not looking forward to watching the Lions game.

by tonywf on Nov 21, 2009 9:51 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Funny-good-times-11_small
Draft Talk Volume 1

Recent FanPosts

01anderson_500_display_image_small
How much longer for our Browns to play in and win a Superbowl?
Small
Are you All In???
01203_rosewoodcanvas_1680x1050_small
If I Were Tom Heckert...
Small
The Manning Saga (Lets make a Deal!)
Cleveland-browns-alternate-logo-5-primary_small
My bottom five: '11 Browns starters.
Small
an outsiders perspective
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 Mock Draft
Small
Lets be Realistic
Kate_beckinsale_2_by_joruji_small
DBN Player Ranking
Hdc-new_logo_small
The face off

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Browns Are the Best in NFL History!
Someone needs to stop this guy.
Rumor: Grossi Removed from Browns Beat at PD

Recent FanShots

BROWNS IN SUPERBOWL?
Stafford wins AP Comeback Player over D'Qwell Jackson
RG3 says he should be #1 overall
NFL expanding Thursday Night Schedule
If NFL team names were honest
Can we be better fans?
Browns to Reduce Ticket Prices for Portions of Dawg Pound
Randy Lerner: The Custodian
Manning not ready to retire yet.

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Evilbrownsavatar1_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

Jared_sullinger--300x450_small Buckeye Brad

Small notthatnoise