Lions Stun Browns With No Time Left for 38-37 Victory
| CLEVELAND BROWNS (1-9) | WEEK 11 | DETROIT LIONS (2-8) | |||
![]() |
VS. | ![]() |
|||
| 37 | 38 |
I didn't think I could get that "giddy" or "nervous" feeling about the Cleveland Browns again this season, but I did. For the first time this season, our offense came alive -- so much to the point that the team scored 37 points, which seems like more points than they've had all season.
Unfortunately, Rob Ryan couldn't get the defense to perform at a high level, and as the clock read double zeros, the Browns fell to 1-9 while the Lions improved to 2-8.
Let's get to the review of a contest finally worthy of calling a "football game"...
WEEK 11 - CLEVELAND BROWNS VS. DETROIT LIONS (COMPLETE GAME REVIEW)
GOATS OF THE GAME:
- Hank Poteat: As frustrated as I was after the pass interference flag was thrown on Matthew Stafford's heave to the end zone, the blame ultimately falls on veteran Hank Poteat. This wasn't the typical Hail Mary heave where eight different players are all colliding with each other in an attempt to catch or knock the ball down. Near Poteat, there might have been three players.
As the ball approached the end zone, the officials had a clear view of Poteat who made contact with Bryant Johnson. If Johnson had been facing the ball, there probably wouldn't have been a call. But, Poteat kept his back to the line of scrimmage, which is just begging for a flag in the NFL. - Chris Jennings: Jennings dropped what was probably the best play by a Browns quarterback this season. Quinn pump faked short to the sideline, and the second that Jennings had a step on his man, Quinn lofted a perfectly thrown football -- all Jennings had to do was make the basket catch in stride and continue another five yards for the score. Instead, he dropped it, and the Browns could only muster a field goal.
AWARDING GAME BALLS:
- Brady Quinn: Quinn could've played one third as good and it still would've been better than any quarterback performance we've had this year. There was a lot of good things that happened from allowing Quinn to throw the ball down the field, something that took far too long into the season to start attempting. The Browns attacked the Lions' secondary early and often Sunday, resulting in an astounding 24 first quarter points.
GENERAL THOUGHTS
- Less Than Two Minutes: With less than two minutes to go and the Lions having no timeouts left, the Browns were faced with a third-and-five situation. Having a six point lead, the Browns could have run the ball -- with the chance of picking up the first down -- and still drained some clock in the need of a punt. Instead, the Browns threw the ball, and the pass fell incomplete. Was it the right decision?
- Blame the Formation: I've had problems all season with the Browns going empty backfield in third-and-medium situations. Why remove the threat of running the ball when it can help prevent pressure from getting to Quinn in the event of a pass?
I didn't have a problem with the Browns attempting a pass in that situation. Our defense had been torched all game long, and although the Lions' time would've been limited, a successful pass play would've put the nail in the coffin. We got what we wanted -- Massaquoi was open on the slant, but Quinn threw it to the outside, an area that was also open. As the chemistry builds between the two, hopefully in the future they can execute this game-sealing play and it won't even have to be up for discussion. - Horrible Pass Coverage: The pass coverage that the Lions had in the first quarter of Sunday's game was among the worst I've ever seen. Seriously -- how do you allow two of our receivers to be wide open by a mile after our offense doesn't even know what the end zone is? Nonetheless, credit to Quinn for putting the throws on the mark, as easy as they may have been.
- Later Deep Balls: Later on in the game, Quinn took two more shots down the field, both to Massaquoi. This time, the coverage was better, but no where near being "good." Quinn gave Massaquoi an opportunity to fight for both balls but he couldn't come away with either one.
The first one was understandable since it slipped through the defender's hands first, but the second one was a guaranteed touchdown if Massaquoi could've spotted it sooner or turned the right way while the ball was in the air. After so much success with the deep ball, albeit against the 32nd ranked pass defense of the Detroit Lions, hopefully the message got through to Brian Daboll: call for throwing the ball down the field. - Stuckey Shows Why He's Here: Make no mistake about it: Chansi Stuckey will never be Braylon Edwards. He finally showed why he'll be a nice piece to the puzzle though as the team's third or fourth receiver in the future -- he can catch the ball and has a knack for getting enough yards after the catch for a first down.
- Loving Gaines' Performance: I've known of TE Michael Gaines for several years, but I've really enjoyed the contributions he's made since coming to the Browns (as odd as that might sound). He makes the most of his opportunities when the ball is thrown his way.
On his first catch against the Lions, he bulldozed over a defender for a gain of three. Later in the drive, he continued to roll out with Brady Quinn and caught his pass as the one-yard line before again plowing through a defender and into the end zone for a go-ahead touchdown. Gaines isn't elite, but he's on my radar for a player to consider keeping around next year as depth. - Tuck the Football: Someone still needs to teach Eric Wright how to secure the football when returning an interception. While he did a good job getting the most yards possible on his first quarter pick, if one defender had caught up from behind, the ball would've been extremely easy to poke out for a fumble.
- WR Screen to Cribbs: The 35-yard catch-and-run screen pass to Joshua Cribbs was amazing, and it represents another type of play we should've been running all season; not these awkward attempts to Mike Furrey. Cribbs caught the ball and looked as explosive as he does on kick returns. He appeared to step on a falling defenders face during his run though, which made me feel his pain through the television. Yikes.
- Direct Snap to Lewis: Since it was unpredictable, props to the team for calling the direct snap to Jamal Lewis to convert the two-point conversion (although the two-pointer really wouldn't have made much of a difference). Speaking of Lewis, considering Quinn's performance and some of the holes he had, he should have produced a tad better than he did.
- Dawson's Fake FG Pass: Who would've known that Phil Dawson is a lefty, and that he can throw a good enough spiral? Given the fact that we ended up trying a shorter field goal out of it might make the play have seemed stupid, but getting closer wasn't the point (something that Randy Cross and Don Criqui were so confused about). It was an unexpected play, and we were probably hoping Mike Furrey wouldn't be recognized hanging out on the sideline.
- Good Punting: He wasn't known for getting punts inside the 20 before coming to Cleveland, but Reggie Hodges did it well against the Lions. Four of his six punts were downed inside the 20, one of which helped lead the Browns to recording a safety on Stafford.
- Speaking of the Safety: Upon seeing the replay, if there had been a receiver in the vicinity and there wasn't a holding call, I still think we would've challenged the play and won. It appeared as though Stafford's knee touched the ground before he threw the football.
- Pathetic Defensive Effort: I held off dissing the defense too much until the thirteenth bullet point. I don't even know how to explain what went wrong with our defense. The pressure on Stafford was minimal, and the coverage on receivers was minimal. That led to Stafford's 422-yard, 5 touchdown performance. Brandon McDonald was reportedly replaced by Mike Adams at the start of the game; odds are McDonald will be back as the starter next week?
- Bowens Does Well Again: I continue to be impressed with the outings that David Bowens is having at inside linebacker, more so than I was with Eric Barton at inside linebacker. LB Jason Trusnik also did well at the outside linebacker position again, but Kamerion Wimbley has seemingly disappeared the past two weeks.
- Picking Something Up? On two consecutive plays, NT Shaun Rogers was flagged -- once for being offsides, and once for jumping before the snap. As the announcers said, he might have found a "tell," but it didn't pay off.
- Limited Return Yardage: The Lions were kicking the ball short to Gerard Lawson early on, although he should've let one of the kicks bounce out of bounds for a penalty. For the game, the Browns enjoyed limited success in return yards, but kicking it short made up for it.
- Pool Out-leaps Johnson: After a Dawson kick in the fourth quarter went out of bounds and the Lions tried to come back, Brodney Pool bailed the Browns out with an interception over WR Calvin Johnson. Granted, Johnson was triple-covered on the play, but it was a play our defense desperately needed at the time. It's a shame it wasn't the game-winner.
- Mangini's Timeout: I really wish Eric Mangini wouldn't have called a timeout to allow Stafford back into the game. You might say, "but don't you want a cripple-armed quarterback throwing there?" No. I assume with Stafford's adrenaline and the short throw required, that he still could've made it, which he did. I doubt Daunte Culpepper had many practice reps though, and I believe there's a good chance he would've flat out muffed the snap. The play would've probably been a quarterback sneak, which I think our defense could've stopped.
- Quinn QB Sneaks: Twice, the Browns ran a quarterback sneak on 3rd-and-1 with success. Those were smart plays since the Lions didn't stack the interior and because we didn't wait until the last second so snap the ball.
- Brownies: I didn't "diss" our defense as much as I should have, but I wanted to feel positive after a game review for once...I didn't think play-by-play announcers could refer to the Lions as the Browns or vice versa so many times, but Randy Cross and Don Criqui proved me wrong.
Next week, the Browns will take on the Cincinnati Bengals, a team that was just upset by the Oakland Raiders. We took Cincinnati to overtime the last time we met, but this time Quinn is in charge of the offense. I'm not getting my hopes up about our offense, but I'm definitely looking forward to seeing whether we can actually build upon our confidence, or if the breakout performance was merely indicative of the lowly Detroit Lions.
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
no real need to dis the defense, chris. they dissed themselves with that performance. it felt good to see them competitive for a change, even if only against the lions, but i still ended the day with an overall frustration at why we can’t jive everything together in the same game.
i don’t get the lack of pressure on stafford, that’s something we’ve been better at this year, and i certainly expected more in this game. given last weeks defensive performance against balti-less, if you would have told me before the game we’d score 37 points, i would have said it’d be a blowout.
yeah that was really disappointing for me as well. after last week, i thought we had a legitimate chance at shutting out the lions, but i guess not :/
by notthatnoise on Nov 23, 2009 11:39 PM EST up reply actions
Not to say I told you so, but it seems that in some earlier thread I did. I don’t say that as a claim to any sort of football acumen, but after the way the D played against Green Bay, I was expecting minimal pressure on Stafford. Unfortunately, they lived down to my expectations.
After a nice start to the year, Wimbley has been non-existent. Trusnick and Bowens I feel have brought the best pass rush over the past few weeks.
Yeah, what has happened to Wimbley?
by Western Reserve on Nov 25, 2009 10:41 AM EST up reply actions
I wonder if he hasn’t been in coverage. That’s where he disappeared to last year.
by golanbatrac on Nov 25, 2009 11:05 AM EST up reply actions
The one for a TD was down the middle. Kinda an old school wheel route.
fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com
by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 25, 2009 11:16 AM EST up reply actions
Not sure. The one’s that break big are usually in front of, and then through Brandon McDonald.
by golanbatrac on Nov 25, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions
Well with the Lions behind us, the Browns need to focus on Cinci. This is going to be a tough one to call. They went to overtime with the Browns and I’m sure they think that should have never happened. Plus they lost to the Raiders, they will be looking for a statement game to show they are top tier. Also with Palmer playing better then when he played us earlier, he might tear up the secondary. if Stafford could do it, why not Palmer and 85.
Who would’ve known that Phil Dawson is a lefty
All these years and I don’t know if anyone ever knew that…The more you know…

Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
by BLAZER_FAN_199 on Nov 24, 2009 10:56 AM EST reply actions 3 recs
But . . . that was because too few of them elected to go to the game, right? Pluto had an interesting column about that in the PD on Monday, saying that it could be a harbinger of things to come in Cleveland. He said that there couldn’t have been more than 40,000 in attendance, including a big contingent of Browns fans.
Excellent re-cap. Now to put all three sides of the game together and make the bungles a little more nervous with a loss…how sweet that would be?
Any word on the GM?
The only thing bad about beating the Bengals is that we would inadvertently be assisting the Steelers and the Ravens.
I haven’t seen anything new on the GM front.
Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.
by Chris Pokorny on Nov 24, 2009 7:15 PM EST up reply actions
i think you can factor in quality of opponent. i don’t know for sure that helps the browns at all, but based on our division and our non-division games i’m guessing it does.
by notthatnoise on Nov 25, 2009 8:59 AM EST up reply actions
Combined win-loss records of opponents:
Bucs opponents: 60-40
Rams opponents: 57-43
Browns opponents: 53-47
Again, the Browns are worst.
^ Misleading.
The Rams have already played both 10-0 teams and the 9-1 Vikings. The Bucs and Browns schedules are similar to this point in the season (they’ve played the 10-0 Saints, we played the 9-1 Vikings; they played the 3-7 Redskins, we played the 2-8 Lions; They played the 7-3 Pats, we played the 7-3 Bengals; We both played the Bills, and the rest of our schedules have been teams with records right around .500).
by golanbatrac on Nov 25, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions
You can call it misleading, but that is the formula the NFL uses for tiebreakers when it comes to draft order. And are we really debating whether the Browns are the worst team in the league? Outside of a few commenters on this blog, it’s pretty unanimous.
The NFL doesn’t use that formula until after the season though. We still may win 2-3 games, and a seven game strength of schedule deficit can be made up in a single weekend. Like Dorn said, the AFC North wins all of their games last week and we’re ahead of the Rams and two games behind the Bucs.
by golanbatrac on Nov 26, 2009 10:13 AM EST up reply actions
I don’t think its unanimous. Anyone that thinks it is unanimous is being close-minded. I have reason to believe that Tampa and the Rams are just as bad as the Browns.
I’m not trying to be close-minded. I’m just saying that if you look at the obvious indicators of a team’s strength, i.e. overall record, strength of schedule, offensive/defensive ratings, the Browns are clearly the worst so far. Now, like golanbatrac mentioned above, the Browns still have time to change this – and I certainly hope they do. But until they prove otherwise, I’d call them the worst.
What? Is that a tiebreaker in who would get the first pick or something?
My Silly Attempt at Blogging: http://prideofcleveland.blogspot.com/
by Red-Right-88 on Nov 25, 2009 8:28 AM EST up reply actions
Green Bay used to be in the same division as Tampa Bay before realignment.
"Nobody ever thinks, 'Hey, maybe I’m actually an idiot.'" - Jay
by woodsmeister on Nov 25, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions
wow divisions were that spread out? thank god for realignment
by notthatnoise on Nov 25, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions
I wish the Titans and Browns were still in the same division. Back in the day, it was Jerry Glanville’s Oilers that I hated more than the Steelers or Bengals.
That late third and five play reminds me of when we played Pitt in the playoffs. Instead of running the ball and forcing Pitt to use their last timeout with a couple mins left, Holcomb threw it and Northcutt dropped it. Allowing Pitt a final drive with one timeout to beat us.
If you're at the table and you don't see a sucker..... you're it.

by 



















