Dawgs By Nature: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

The Regression of Derek Anderson, by the Numbers

From 2007 to 2009, Derek Anderson's performance has clearly declined. He's always had the same weaknesses, but they've become more prominent this season -- to the point that he should be deemed as one of the worst starting quarterbacks of all time.

DEREK ANDERSON (FIRST 5 STARTS) - FROM 2007 to 2009

Year Comp Att Yds Y/A Pct % Int TD Sack Fum FumL W-L
2007 88 156 1312 8.4 56.4% 7 13 5 2 0 3-2
2008 76 146 853 5.8 52.1% 6 5 8 5 0 2-3
2009 55 135 589 4.4 40.7% 6 2 8 5 3 1-4

54471_browns_bears_football_medium
All of the categories have either gone up or down, but all of them have the same theme: a dropoff in production. Completion percentage has declined to an unimaginable 40%. The yards per attempt category, something you'd expect to be higher for a gunslinger like Anderson, is nearly half of what it was in 2007.

The number of interceptions has remained constant, but the touchdown differential has taken a major swing downhill.  Anderson's also fumbling the ball more often.

Can you believe there were hopes that we could trade Derek Anderson for a first-round draft pick after the 2007 season? If there was ever a time to sell, that was the time. With the eggs that Anderson has laid the past two years, I think teams would laugh if it were suggested they even give up a seventh-round draft pick.

More importantly, when looking at the past two years, this is the type of production that has kept Brady Quinn on the bench? Thanks again, Romeo Crennel.

Memo to Eric Mangini: although Quinn struggled to start this season, Anderson isn't going to get any better. At least give Quinn half a season to prove himself before such a drastic decision -- drafting a quarterback in the first round of the 2010 NFL Draft -- is made.

0 recs  |  Comment 148 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good write up. I wonder if any high ups in the Brown’s FO reads these articles.

They should.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 5, 2009 2:14 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Forgot to add this point:

Granted, the drop in production also correlates with the loss of players over time (Jurevicius, Winslow, Tucker, a “better” Lewis), but if a QB depends solely on his supporting cast, he’s not the answer.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Nov 5, 2009 2:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

agreed. those factors may lower QB production slightly, but not to the degree we’ve seen from DA. i’m baffled by how horrible those numbers are, and even more baffled by how someone with the capability of producing in the NFL has so drastically deteriorated in such a short timespan. DA has always been somewhat inaccurate with short passes, but it seems like this year he isn’t even close. what could have caused that?

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 5, 2009 2:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

if a QB depends solely on his supporting cast

Agreed. This also describes Cutler thus far.

It’s a good thing we didn’t trade for him. I imagine he’d put up worse number than he has for the Bears, but granted couldn’t possibly be as bad as Anderson or Quinn.

by Simmsinns on Nov 5, 2009 3:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Very nice summary.

I agree it is time to see Brady Quinn again but I don’t think he should start against the Ravens at home. There are apt to be a lot of other factors that will make that game a pressure cooker not to mention the fact that the Ravens are good and the Browns are bad. I think coach Mangini should start Quinn against the Lions and leave him in for the rest of the season. If Quinn cannot show us more than he did in the first couple of games against the likes of the Chiefs, Raiders and Jags, then he ain’t the guy.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Nov 5, 2009 2:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Seconded. Planning for the future means throwing Anderson to the Ravens and letting Quinn take the easy schedule to see if he can do anything there.

It was a brutal opening to the season, shame we didn’t see it coming.

by LondonBrown on Nov 5, 2009 2:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Throw Quinn in against the Ravens…please give me something to look forward to for that Monday Night!

by Red-Right-88 on Nov 5, 2009 2:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But let him play the whole game this time.

by Western Reserve on Nov 5, 2009 5:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

First of all, the Ravens defense hasn’t been that great his year, anyways. Secondly, if Quinn is going to show us something for the future then he needs to do it against more than just bad teams. I don’t see any problems with starting him against Baltimore.

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 5, 2009 3:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, But he needs to know now so he can get som reps with the receivers.

by holmes213 on Nov 5, 2009 4:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The “badness” of the Ravens defense is nothing compared to the genuine badness that is Detroit. Agreed that BQ has to show us more than just excellence against bad teams, he can do that against San Diego, Cincy and Pittsburgh. Throw him into the mood that will be in the stadium a week from Monday and you are setting him up for failure.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Nov 5, 2009 10:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i dont know, wasnt he 6/8 against the Ravens? Hope they let him open up the offense and also tell him to run if it is open.

by Red-Right-88 on Nov 6, 2009 9:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Trade bait

Since Anderson has eliminated any chance of even a high school team picking him up, it is time to showcase Quinn. This last half of the season can either watch him grow to the QB the team wants or at least get him out there for others to see.

One way or the other, he needs to bring up some kind of value. This will be the best way to make it happen. Lets get something out of the remainder of the season.

by sean222 on Nov 5, 2009 2:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Since Anderson has eliminated any chance of even a high school team picking him up

He lost that opportunity when he graduated.

by Simmsinns on Nov 5, 2009 3:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

by the way, as a matter of simple math (assuming all snaps are evenly distributed across the season, which is obviously not the reality), if brady were to play all the rest of this year’s games he’d be at approximately 65.6% of the snaps (2.5+8/16).

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 5, 2009 2:43 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

that’s a little to close to the 70% mark lets sit him one more game just to be sure.

by cfields on Nov 5, 2009 3:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That assumes that the offense stays at it’s current production / number of snaps per game. If Quinn somehow sustains drives the number of offensive snaps per game would go up and he would be very close to hitting the 70% mark. I think this may keep him from starting for another week.

by dvbb on Nov 5, 2009 8:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

From Football Outsiders’ Walkthrough:

The Stat: Cleveland’s 2.55 yards per pass attempt on third down.

The Breakdown: The Browns are a bad stat factory, churning out mystifyingly awful numbers every week. Their passing statistics on third down are bad even by their standards. Derek Anderson completes just 32.1 percent of his third-down passes, netting just 12 first downs in 56 attempts. At 2.55 yards per third down pass, the Browns are worse than the Lions (4.33), Rams (4.65) and Raiders (3.32).

Check out the Browns’ third down passing breakdowns over the last three games:

Against the Steelers: 1-of-7 for one yard, one touchdown, two sacks, two fumbles lost, one interception, and one first down.
Against the Packers: 4-of-9 for 27 yards, one interception, one sack, one fumble lost (one recovered), and two first downs
Against the Bears: 1-of-7 for 10 yards, one interception, one fumble, no first downs.

The three-game totals: 6-of-23, 38 yards, one touchdown, three interceptions, three sacks, four fumbles, three first downs. The three sacks lost 27 yards, so the Browns netted 11 yards on 26 pass attempts, or 0.423 yards per attempt. Suddenly, that 2.55 figure we started with looks pretty good.

Oddly enough, the Browns average 5.17 yards per third down carry, and they are 10-of-19 on third down rushing conversions. The team has had some success with Josh Cribbs’ “Golden Flash” Wildcat plays and Jerome Harrison draws on third down. It’s easy to see why Eric Mangini would resort to such tactics when you see the passing breakdowns.

The Implications: The Browns have been held under seven points in nine of their last 14 games. That’s a pretty big implication.

The Future: Eventually, Brady Quinn will win back the starting job, and the Browns offense will start creeping back toward the bottom of the league average. Right? Right? Someone please tell me that’s right.

You are reading my signature.

by rolub on Nov 5, 2009 2:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

That’s sad when we have to strive to crawl back to the bottom.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 5, 2009 3:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I guess the 5.17 yards per carry would make me understand alittle more of why we run on 3rd and not pass.See how we only avg 2.5 yards a pass on 3rd I would take 5 over 2 anyday to bad it is always 3rd and 15 or it feels like it is.

by Brownsfan4ever on Nov 5, 2009 7:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting stats rolub.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Nov 5, 2009 10:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yup. He posted them, right?

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Nov 5, 2009 10:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You just replied the wrong person is all.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 5, 2009 10:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

KK. This is as good a place as any…

Heard this on a podcast. The Saints defense has more TDs this year than the Browns offense. Ouch!

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Nov 6, 2009 10:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the yards/carry number is inflated, sadly the only decent stat up there.

I am remembering a couple of Harrison draws on 3rd down that gained about 10 yards, but we were in a 3rd and 15+. I’d think a defense would gladly allow a 4th and 5.

by rufio on Nov 6, 2009 1:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes but it still shows how bad DA has been that you would take a draw on 3 and 15 and not a pass

by Brownsfan4ever on Nov 6, 2009 5:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Replace Harrison with Metcalf, and this is the same offense Bill Belichick ran in Cleveland. The fans hated it then as much as they do now.

by golanbatrac on Nov 6, 2009 9:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s what I was thinking, too.

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 6, 2009 8:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, and that nice Cribbs wildcat run for like 10 yards on 3rd and 19.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 6, 2009 9:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think it is time to let Quinn play but I don’t think that he is the answer. Most of the players he needs to do good are going. They been cut are sent to Tampa Bay.

by Ralph b on Nov 5, 2009 2:59 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

— to the point that he should be deemed as one of the worst starting quarterbacks of all time.

OUCH! IT BURNS!

If you're at the table and you don't see a sucker..... you're it.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 5, 2009 3:02 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

You know its bad when

you’re left pining for the Tim Couch/ Holcomb days.

by L Train on Nov 5, 2009 4:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

At least in those days we made the playoffs.

by holmes213 on Nov 5, 2009 4:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s sad that some of us would take Couch over DA right now

If you're at the table and you don't see a sucker..... you're it.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 5, 2009 4:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve always wondered what would have become of Couch had he not been wasted on an expansion team.

by golanbatrac on Nov 5, 2009 5:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You mean, not being beat up by a poor OL? Too many young QBs get thrown to the wolves on bad teams. The teams are bad, the QB is going to get ate up.

by holmes213 on Nov 5, 2009 6:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think in the right system Couch could have been successful. He just didn’t have the leadership skills to take over an expansion team.

by bbstirrd on Nov 6, 2009 9:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I always thought they put Couch in too soon. True, we only had Detmer at the time and he really was lousy the first game but I thought putting a rookie QB into the disorganization that is an expansion team was a big mistake.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Nov 6, 2009 10:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Couch still had a career qb rating in the 70s. That really tells you how bad DA sucks.

by A_James on Nov 6, 2009 1:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

75.1 59.8 Completion pct. 64TD 67 Int’s and numerous multiple sack games…

by Red-Right-88 on Nov 6, 2009 1:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He really wasn’t that bad.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 6, 2009 2:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He was good for a system QB.

It was truly the lines fault.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 6, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He was great for the system he ran at Kentucky. He was average for an expansion Browns team with a terrible line.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 6, 2009 2:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just say no to Quinn for the rest of this year. I’m a Quinn backer and would love to see him out there except I don’t want him out there with our OL. Both quarterbacks have been awful and whoever is back there has little chance of success thanks to the disaster that is the right side of the OL.

Everyone wants to know what Quinn can do, but playing him on this team with no protection and rookie receivers isn’t going to tell us anything about he’s ability to play QB (other than, can he take a beating).

DA has turned into a complete lost cause. There is no reason to turn Quinn into one too.

by dvd1204 on Nov 5, 2009 5:17 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Actually, I don’t think the line has played that poorly the last few games. The right side seems to have come together a little bit and they have added some support by keeping a TE (sometimes Fraley), FB, or RB in to help out.

If Quinn is worth considering for the future, he’ll be able to show something, even with this team, over 8 games.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 5, 2009 5:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Nov 5, 2009 5:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

At the very least he should be able to put up better numbers than Anderson. I don’t know if he will, but he really should be able to considering how low the bar has been set.

by JustBob on Nov 5, 2009 9:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have been pleasantly surprised with St. Clair. Unfortunately, he seems to dislike Quinn and false starts a lot/lets a lot of rushers through when Quinn is back there.

by rufio on Nov 6, 2009 1:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That or he has improved/learned the offense.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 6, 2009 9:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I really hope it’s that, but this was a trend in the preseason when Quinn and DA were alternating series, too.

He couldn’t have learned and then forgotten and then learned again so quickly so to have looked like that on every other series.

There are definitely other explanations, too, (Dumervil being way better than I give him credit for, playcalling, QBs holding on to the ball, DA’s weird drifts left that have tarnished Joe Thomas’s numbers and probably made it easier on St. Clair, etc.) But the trend of St. Clair playing worse in front of Quinn is certainly odd.

by rufio on Nov 6, 2009 5:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think it’s Dumervil being way better than anyone thought.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 6, 2009 5:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m surprised you’d say that. Frankly, I don’t know either way. It just seems like a comment that normally would warrant crucifixion around here. Interesting point that we may get a chance to look out for in the coming weeks.

by Western Reserve on Nov 7, 2009 10:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The right side of our line is nothing to brag about, but it has improved since the start of the season. It’s not like we’re throwing Quinn to the wolves. Now, if our receivers are so bad that they can’t even get open worth a lick, he probably will get sacked, but you can’t not play him just because of that.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Nov 5, 2009 5:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bingo. Was that a simulpost?

The WRs have been a bit of a problem and from the angle that most of us watch the games, it is tough to see how open they are getting or not. Every now and then, we’ll get a replay from behind the QB and can see the whole field. I’ve pointed out a couple times where DA has missed open WRs. Plus, it can be hard to tell when a WR misses a read. One of DA’s INTs and one of Quinn’s incomplete passes came on plays where it looked like Massaquoi failed to recognize the blitz and failed to cut his route off short.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 5, 2009 5:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

MoMass and Robiskie need to get WAY better at getting off of press coverage. They are too big to let CBs press them like Green Bay did.

by rufio on Nov 6, 2009 1:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

drafting a quarterback in the first round of the 2010 NFL Draft

I honestly don’t know if this would be a good idea.

by holmes213 on Nov 5, 2009 6:06 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

It probably isn’t.
Which is why there isn’t much to look forward to 2010 either (offensively).

by Simmsinns on Nov 5, 2009 6:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

IF Quinn doesn’t look better throughout the rest of the season I think it would be a good idea to pick up a QB in the draft IF we also pick up an older veteran that the new guy can learn behind. Inserting a rookie into this team would be very risky.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Nov 5, 2009 10:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t want to draft a QB in the first round. Free Agency. That’s where our next QB comes from. Or maybe a trade.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 5, 2009 11:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Or a late 2nd round or even a 3rd round pick but first no thanks.

by Brownsfan4ever on Nov 6, 2009 5:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In 2007 Derek Anderson was Fool's Gold

I said it back then, but I was lambasted for being a killjoy throwing a wet rag over a deceiving 10-6 season. For starters, we in the AFC North had a ridicuosly easy schedule. I know, the NFL is the NFL, but we played the AFC East, where only the Patriots were any good, and the NFC West, where no one was good, even the Division winner Seattle, was soft as church music. In fact, Seattle was the only winning team the Browns beat that year, which should tell you that 2007 might be a mirage. Also, two team in our Division the Bengals and the Ravens, were also down.

To Anderson in particular, a great majority of his numbers came in the first half (5 TDs against the horrible Bengals, etc.). In the second half of the season, after tape got around the league, Anderson had already stopped being an effective quarterback. He still ended up with enough numbers overall, against all those bad teams, to make the Pro Bowl. If you recall his games later in that season, he was not a Pro Bowl quarterback. He was Fool’s Gold. There are still a lot of Browns fans who bring up the old “Anderson was a Pro Bowl quarterback in 2007.” Those people are jousting at windmills.

Brady Quinn played two and a half games this season. He played against arguably the three toughest defenses in the NFL this year, or at least three of the best, and then got benched during a panic attack. He needs to be in the games developing relationships with Massaqous and Robiskie and Heiden. The Browns aren’t going anywhere this year. Those four guys, along with the linemen, need to be best friends. They need to be taking snaps. They need to be developing and improving.

That 2007 season was the worst thing that could have happened to Cleveland. It gave people a false impression of Anderson, who cannot play quarterback in this league, and set Quinn back two years. In fact, Cleveland would have been far better off playing Quinn from the get-go in 2007. Quinn would have been far more developed. Instead, they set him back again at halftime of Game Three this year.

Put Quinn in the game right now and hope that by the end of the year, you see some sparkle that will get you excited about 2010.

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Nov 5, 2009 7:20 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I agree as well I did not want us to resign Anderson I was in no way sold on his numbers and was ready to see what Quinn had to offer.I figured there had to be somethign there for us to trade up like we did.

I told my dad the day after we signed Anderson back that we should have let another team sign him so we could get a pick.But my dad brough up a good point maybe the reason Anderson signed back with the Browns so fast is because there was no one out there that wanted him.

by Brownsfan4ever on Nov 5, 2009 7:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Browns should have joined those other teams that did not want Anderson

Quinn should be much more experienced by now. Yes, he dropped in the first round, but very few teams ahead of #22 needed a quarterback, so that was misleading. Every person and source that knew anything about scouting had Quinn as a first-round pick. Of course, he needs growing pains, and he should be over them by now.

But that’s water under the bridge now. The Browns have a free half of an NFL season, at full speed, where they can put Quinn in charge of the team, let Robiskie on the field and sow his oats, develop rapport with a young Massaquois and use Heiden as well. Tell them all you want for them to do is grow over the course of eight games and have momentum into the offseason and into next season. There is nothing to lose and a whole lot to gain.

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Nov 5, 2009 9:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Browns should have joined those other teams that did not want Anderson
Quinn should be much more experienced by now. Yes, he dropped in the first round, but very few teams ahead of #22 needed a quarterback, so that was misleading. Every person and source that knew anything about scouting had Quinn as a first-round pick.

A player’s playing time should be based off what they show in preseason, practice and when given the chance in games not based off pre-draft scouting.

Personally, I still think that baring an amazing last half of the season that both QBs will be gone. Also, though I feel Quinn has had 3 years to earn the starting job through practice just as DA did, I also have to agree that when he has been allowed to start he seems to be on a quick hook and that that has had an effect on his productivity when actually in games.

I’m not one to declare Quinn a bust, but I do wonder why he has been unable to take the job from DA. Strangely I feel Quinn has had trouble showing leadership on the professional level, and i find that strange because he was such a leader in college. I don’t know if his demeanor or personality is a culprit but from the outside looking in it has never seemed that the team has ever viewed Quinn as capable of being a leader.

"This season has been everything most of us feared it would be[.]"

Mike Rutherford, Card Chronicle

http://www.cardchronicle.com/

by Villeslgr on Nov 5, 2009 10:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Looks like Mangini’s grand plan is coming together, eh eh… Play Anderson enough and the fans will never call for him to play again. Now, Quinn can play without any worry of the fans calling for DA. Now Quinn can have the cushion he needs to grow into the role.

Am I the only one who sees the method to Mangini’s madness?!?!? Just you wait. I can see EM pulling out a cigar at the end of the season saying, “I love it when a plan comes together.”

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin

by Spidey on Nov 5, 2009 9:39 PM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

This is the greatest loophole anyone has ever conceived!

You sir, are a mangenius.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 5, 2009 9:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hard to believe, but Mangini’s coaching future is in Quinn’s hands… This thing is made for Hollywood. All according to plan, guys. All according to plan.

All that’s left to do is to find the stars for this unlikely buddy movie that’s sure to be the feel-good hit for the holidays.

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin

by Spidey on Nov 5, 2009 10:46 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

If EM is the Colonel, obviously Quinn is Face, but who is BA and Murdock?

by L Train on Nov 6, 2009 1:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Michael Gaines and uhh.. Joe Thomas?

"Quote goes here."

by Adrock2099 on Nov 6, 2009 2:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

One argument says that DA needs people who can catch the ball – that he hits his receivers in the numbers or in the face or on the hands, but they drop the passes.

I argue that Quinn will be able to hit his receivers more often than DA in the numbers or in the face or on the hands, and generate more chances to drop the passes.

…And with more chances to drop the passes, we would have a better chance of getting some that are not dropped.

by tribe71 on Nov 5, 2009 10:20 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

this is why DA needs to sit on the bench and quinn needs to start for the rest of the season. if he continues to play, DA’s going to have the worst passer rating of a starting qb in a long time. i think he’s already beat ryan leaf.

but, mangini seems to have some sort of attachment to DA if he still hasn’t benched him after these awful performances. so come MNF, we’ll all be calling for DA’s head again.

by emily522 on Nov 5, 2009 10:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Stats Lie

Great comparison from year to year! The fact is though he is worse than these stats would lead someone to believe! It’s not the 40% completions its the fact that he can’t put the ball in the hands of a outlet receiver 5 YARDS AWAY! I am an avid golfer and I suggest to you dear brown fan that DA has the YIPS big time! I can’t imagine that any less than 75% of the people reading this would throw the dump off pass with any less accuracy or pace than DA. This has always been an issue with him but it was overlooked because he had a deep ball arm, and Braylon had a case of stickum in 07. Quinn must be given a real chance. He can make these throws at least,

by Kymar on Nov 5, 2009 11:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Probably not a good idea to end your first four sentences with an exclamation point.

by rufio on Nov 6, 2009 1:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree! You are exactly right! Way too many exclamation points! This needs to stop!

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 6, 2009 8:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think we should not post for the first 10 minutes of the next fanshot in protest of exclamation point overuse!

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Nov 6, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In pre season we came to the conclusion that Karma predicts neither Derek Anderson nor Brady Quinn will have productive careers with the Cleveland Browns. Fate has proven our prognostication to be accurate.
The franchise is obligated to play one or the other, because their contractual obligations indicate that their performance based pay is directly relatable to the other player´s failure. The contents of their contracts brings them into a direct correlation, that we can not deny. Neither player can be motivated to lead the club at any time, if their salaries are subject to such extreme fluctuation, not based on success but the other player´s failure.
At this point their individual performances have declined to such a degree, that starting Brett Ratliff finally seems warranted. We hope they can renegotiate their contracts with a fair franchise to their liking.

by mooncamping on Nov 6, 2009 8:39 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Reasoning aside, I would not be upset to see Ratliff next game. Make it happen, mooncamping.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Nov 6, 2009 9:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wish I could, but as GM I can only make strong suggestions. Only the owner can make mandatory requests.
The head coach decides who to play, on both sides of the ball. I would hope coach Mangini realizes the urgency in making a statement regarding no confidence in either Derek Anderson or Brady Quinn. We think Brett Ratliff is a capable backup, but who knows maybe he´s got an even better motor than we thought and more in his tank than most analysts would allow. He´s shown he can at least run an offense in preseason action with the Jets last year. I would like to see him, because he´s not conflicted.

by mooncamping on Nov 7, 2009 7:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In other news, Randy Lerner wants to be involved with the transition to a presentable NFL franchise. We trust him to be a valuable asset in the process. We would however enjoy if he was a little bit more candid with the press and not eschew the attention the media can bestow.
We would appreciate if Eric Mangini can bear the brunt of leading the team in these times of turmoil. We want him to be part of this franchise, and a graduation from coaching duties into the front office seems plausible. We do require him to make some changes regarding his loyalties in the coaching staff. We realize bringing personnel from the New York Jets helped ease his transition, but we want people representative of a broader spectrum.
The media office will cooperate with the media. If you have questions regarding the immediate future please ask to speak to Mr. Lerner or coach Mangini, or issue a shoutout in the usual media outlets.

by mooncamping on Nov 6, 2009 8:54 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

What you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this blog is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Hey... Cleveland happens.

by zdub1983 on Nov 6, 2009 9:57 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

rec for billy madison.

by emily522 on Nov 6, 2009 2:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Puppy Who Lost His Way…

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 6, 2009 3:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

“The part of the story I don’t like is that the little boy gave up looking for Happy after an hour. He didn’t put posters up or anything, he just sat on the porch like a goon and waited. That little boy’s gotta think ‘You got a pet. You got a responsibility.’ If your dog gets lost you don’t look for an hour then call it quits. You get your ass out there and you find that f*cking dog.”

by emily522 on Nov 6, 2009 4:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cut & paste from the Belichick Interview

Cole: When you’re looking at quarterbacks, what do you examine most?

Belichick: One of the things we saw last year with (Matt) Cassel when we put him out there: … You put a guy in there who hasn’t played, the first couple of weeks you wonder if you made the right decision. And then, as they grow in the offense and they control it and it’s their offense and their team, sometimes those players go from here (holds his hand low) to here (holds his hand high) and sometimes they don’t. Sometimes they just muddle along and they never grow. Cassel grew from the San Diego game last year to the Miami game to the San Francisco game. There were a few plays at first and then it was, "Hey, this guy is a legitimate starting NFL quarterback." The funny thing is that happened after Cassel wasn’t really that great in preseason. He was OK, but nothing like what we saw in the season.

It changed when he took all the walkthroughs. He was the guy in the meetings, he took all the reps in practice, he was the guy with the game plan, he was the guy saying, "Hey, I don’t like this route, I like this." He had the input and it was catered to him, just like how Brady says, "I don’t like that play." OK, we’ve got plenty of other plays. But that might be a play that Cassel likes running, but he doesn’t say anything because he’s not the quarterback at the time. When he became the quarterback, he started talking about it and saying what he liked. I think all quarterbacks go through that. So where they are now and where they are going to be, as they grow into it and the coaches figure out who they are, sometimes the only way you find out is to actually let them do it.

by LondonBrown on Nov 6, 2009 11:45 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

What strikes me with the Brady/ Casser thing is how they changed the plays to suit Cassel and how much that let Cassel lead them through the season.

Did we even have one system that could be adapted to suit the other QB?

In a nutshell, no, so our system isn’t tailored to suit our QB.

by LondonBrown on Nov 6, 2009 11:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My guess would be that our playbook is so big that it actually encompasses both QBs’ strengths. Instead of “tailoring” it down to fit either guy, we are stuffing two people in one gigantic suit, letting one guy wear a suit that is big enough for two people.

by rufio on Nov 6, 2009 5:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Like a pantomime cow?

It would be a brilliant startegy of the rest of the team could manage it; but with so many new & rookie skill position players… nah.

by LondonBrown on Nov 7, 2009 9:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A few years ago, when we drafted Quinn, Kirk herbstriet said the browns should just draft Troy Smith. Since they blew it the first time, and if Quinn flops, they should really try and get Smith from Bmore rather than draft another flop.

by HenryDawg on Nov 6, 2009 11:47 AM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

I really was hoping the Browns would draft Smith. I’m as big a Troy Smith as you will find. I think he will be a good starting NFL QB some day.

But why would Baltimore give him up?

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 6, 2009 1:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He was supposed to be their starter. But he got toncelitis(sp?) I think.

He’s a side armer though. I’d be worried of vision issues.

I would love him as our starter though.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 6, 2009 1:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A 6’0’’, side arming QB. I don’t think that would work out.

by Western Reserve on Nov 6, 2009 1:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s what I’m saying. He has skills, but not height.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 6, 2009 2:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

His size was the one knock on him. I don’t really see him as too much of a sidearmer. I think Drew Brees provides a good model of how a very accurate, but undersized QB can be successful. I doubt he’d ever be as prolific as Brees, but it shows that a 6’ frame is not a fatal flaw if you have accuracy, which Smith does.

He has a strong arm and really good accuracy. He has a little mobility in the pocket. I love Troy Smith.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 6, 2009 2:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He is not a side-armer. He is a winder-upper. Was, at least. I haven’t seen him in quite a while.

But when he was being used in Baltimore, he was doing alright and when he wasn’t making good passes it didn’t look like it was because of a lack of height.

by rufio on Nov 6, 2009 5:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He is so a side armer. I remember watching the Pats game and all the commentators said about Smith is that he doesn’t throw it over his head.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 6, 2009 8:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

well, the commentators were wrong. and you are wrong. he is definitely not a side-armer.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 6, 2009 9:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait a minute . . . you mean TV commentators might be wrong?!? No way!

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 6, 2009 9:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

for good measure (even though this isn’t a particularly good highlight reel…why so many runs?)

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 6, 2009 9:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He is sort of a ‘winder-upper’ after watching that clip — slow, deliberate throwing motion.

That’s one of the knocks on Tebow. He’s got a long wind up before he throws. And worse, his motion sometimes drops the ball down near his waist. It’s hurt him in his college years and is really something you won’t get away with in the NFL.

by Western Reserve on Nov 7, 2009 10:13 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Troy Smith > Tim Tebow
(both college and pro)

Just had to get that off my chest.

by Simmsinns on Nov 7, 2009 11:50 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

“his motion sometimes drops the ball down near his waist. It’s hurt him in his college years and is really something you won’t get away with in the NFL.”

the announcers were talking about that last time i watched a florida game, saying how that won’t work in the nfl. i can’t remember who they were playing, but it was a few weeks ago.

by emily522 on Nov 7, 2009 12:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Check out some of the other highlight clips. He doesn’t have a big windup and overall gets the ball out quite quickly.

Tebow’s windup is atrocious. The ball goes down to his mid thigh before he throws a wobbly wounded duck as hard as he can. He makes the ball look like it ways 50 lbs.

Smith keeps the ball high at all times, and even when he winds up, the ball doesn’t come down to his waist.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 9, 2009 10:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think it is a lot of runs because its exclusively his sophomore and junior year. His senior year he didn’t run much at all.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 9, 2009 10:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, as I’ve mentioned before I think Smith has a chance to be a good NFL QB if given the chance. I really wonder what would have happened last year had he not been sick in training gamp which enable Flacco to win the job. His senior year, Herbstreit and other made the comparison of him to Drew Brees (being short and mobile with good arms). Not that he’ll ever end up being that good, of course, but I’d love to see him get the chance to start in Cleveland. Unfortunately, the Ravens would never trade him to the Browns.

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 6, 2009 2:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think there might be some nostalgia here for his OSU days. I’ve got nothing against him, I wish him the best, but I don’t think it’s in the cards for him to be an NFL starter.

by Western Reserve on Nov 6, 2009 2:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The heisman he won should sit on Ted Ginn’s mantle.

by golanbatrac on Nov 6, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is silly. If anything, the bonus Ginn received as a top-10 pick should go to Smith’s bank account.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 6, 2009 2:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It didn’t help Smith that the safeties were twenty yards of the line to compensate for Ginn’s speed? We saw Smith without Ginn in the Florida game. The results weren’t pretty.

by golanbatrac on Nov 6, 2009 3:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

off, of course.

by golanbatrac on Nov 6, 2009 3:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was astounded how the absence of Ginn totally changed the offensive scheme in that game.

Ginn’s speed is legendary, but he was extremely raw as a route runner (still is 3 years later), his hands aren’t terribly reliable, and its not like he was Smith’s only target. Gonzalez had just as productive a year, and he found his 3 and 4 WRs with consistency (sure it helped that they were both NFL caliber also- Robiskie and Hartline). In the end, Smith won the Heisman because he was very accurate and played on a great team. He spread the ball around too. 8 guys caught TD passes.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 6, 2009 3:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I don’t think Ginn was a dominant reciever in the mold of Michael Crabtree, for example. It’s not like he was the only main target who Smith was throwing to 15 times a game. He spread the ball around all over the field to many recievers, as you said. Gonzo was just as important as Ginn was, taking advantage of the defense worrying about his speed. Smith was great at making plays wherever they were available, not just to one receiver.

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 6, 2009 3:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Florida game was much more a story of our OL getting flat out dominated and our lack of ability to stop mobile QBs than our lack of a #1 WR in my book.

There was also the thing about the players being overconfident, too.

by rufio on Nov 6, 2009 5:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thing is, he was an NFL starter for the end of 07 and beginning of 08. Some bizarre illness during the preseason cost him 30 lbs, his starting job, and nearly his life.

Flacco played well enough to keep the job all of last year and for the foreseeable future, but he is the type of guy I’d want my team to consider if they needed a QB, like the Browns obviously do.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 6, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not me. I’m not an OSU nostalgia guy like many Browns fans who only want to pick former Buckeyes. He did have some success as an NFL starter, as DD said, but only lost his job because of an illness. Then Flacco took over, played well, and never game him a chance to compete for the job again. I think Smith has a lot of the skills necessary to be a solid NFL QB. As I said, Brees showed that you don’t have to be 6’4" to play QB in the NFL. I would jump at the chance to get him for a mid-round draft pick and see what he can do as a starting QB.

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 6, 2009 3:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But Brees is a special case and he is way way more accurate that Smith. I like Smith and think he’s fine as a backup, but as a starting QB? No way. Although he is probably better than anyone currently on the roster.

by Cols714 on Nov 6, 2009 4:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hard to say he is “way way more accurate than Smith”. He was amazingly accurate at Ohio State (even better completion percentage than Brees at Purdue in a pass happy offense). Brees is putting up incredible numbers now, but as a college passer and in their first years as a pro, I see huge similarities. Also “short” and decent to very good NFL careers: Doug Flutie, Fran Tarkenton, Mike Vick, Jeff Garcia, Joe Theismann.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 6, 2009 5:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There is no way you can say “no way”.

Brees is ridiculously accurate, and Smith is definitely not as accurate, I will give you that. But just because Smith can’t hit a bullseye 10/10 times like Brees doesn’t mean he isn’t an accurate passer.

by rufio on Nov 6, 2009 5:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

omg that is amazing

by emily522 on Nov 6, 2009 6:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I want to see DA try that.

by golanbatrac on Nov 6, 2009 6:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have a feeling he would miss the target completely. The people doing the test feel so bad for him, that they decide to let him throw until he makes contact. Finally, after two hours of watching him try with no success, they move the target back 20 more yards in which he is finally able to connect (albeit on only 2 of 10 attempts).

by Chief WaDrew on Nov 7, 2009 1:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I said above that I don’t expect Troy Smith to be anything close to Drew Brees. I don’t think you can say that there is “no way” he’s a starting NFL QB. He hasn’t had much of a chance yet.

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 6, 2009 6:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Brad – tomorrow we’re enemies. talk to you Sunday.

PSU 17 – OSU 6

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 6, 2009 2:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cole: So accuracy and decision-making are the most important things?

*Belichick: * For me, yeah.

*Cole: *Can you even distinguish between the two?

Belichick: What’s one without the other? If you make the wrong decision, you’ve got problems, and if you can’t throw the ball, even if you make the right decision, you’ve got problems. So if you’ve got those two, you’ve got Joe Montana. If you can’t do one of those two, then what’s the future? … If you have those two things, you have a quarterback. If you don’t have those two things, you’re going to have to dumb it down. You’re either going to have to limit the decisions he makes or take the accuracy element out of it by either not throwing over 10 yards or not throwing outside the numbers. You’re going to have to do something that changes the way you play offense.

by LondonBrown on Nov 6, 2009 11:48 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

And this one on Quinn- so he has the accuracy, it looked in the first couple of games like he didn’t have the decisions.

by LondonBrown on Nov 6, 2009 11:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i don’t know, those first two games made me question his accuracy too. its there, but its far from consistent

by notthatnoise on Nov 6, 2009 2:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Last year it looked like he had both of those things—with the exception of 1 ball out of 15 that would just go nowhere near anything. The other 14/15 looked fairly accurate.

The big problem is that this year he looked like he lost both the accuracy AND the decision making.

by rufio on Nov 6, 2009 5:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder how much of that could be due to tinkering with his mechanics. I haven’t heard anything about that this year, but I recall that was being done last year. There might also be some lingering effects from that injury to his finger.

by JustBob on Nov 6, 2009 7:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Derek Anderson'

You could put God in as Qb. His play would not be much better.
 Derek Anderson is not the problem. Nor is BQ, CF, or the other parade of QB’s
the last 10 years. I cringed at the play selections, and the formations used
by this team. The sad thing is I know the answear . I just can’t do anything about it.

by djkscuba on Nov 6, 2009 8:58 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

We’ve all come to concensus that DA is clearly the problem. While numbers usually don’t tell the whole story, these numbers pretty much tell it in black and white.

Anybody who says it’s not DA really doesn’t understand what’s truly going on.

Yes, the playcalling has been terrible since expansion, but a play doesn’t make DA throw an INT right into Woodson’s lap.

And Quinn could be a problem. But honestly, don’t try to pull a story on how it’s not DA’s fault. You’ll just dig yourself an early grave.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 6, 2009 9:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

do you honestly believe we wouldn’t be a better team with manning, brees, brady, etc. at qb? we’re not a playoff team right now either way, but we’re definitely better and much more competitive with a competent qb. each qb we have now is missing at least one aspect of the passing game: BQ can hit the short ones better, DA can hit the long ones better. but if your passing game is limited to one dimension, you’ll struggle. a good qb doesn’t have those limits and woul therefore make us better.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 7, 2009 7:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

nope. the only way we are a better team is with djkscuba as offensive coordinator.

by Ryan Kelsey on Nov 9, 2009 10:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As GM I would like to express an interest in the following quarterbacks:
1. Jared Zabransky, Boise State-Edmonton Eskimos
2. David Carr, Fresno State-New York Giants
3. Chris Pizzotti, Harvard-New York Jets
4. Bill Volek, Fresno State-San Diego Chargers
5. Rex Grossman, Florida-Houston Texans
6. David Greene, Georgia-retired from the Indianapolis Colts, would be considered.
(7.) Darrell Hackney, Alabama Birmingham-released by the Florida Tuskers, is an exciting player for a temporary starting designation.
I would commend any of these players to start over Derek Anderson or Brady Quinn.

by mooncamping on Nov 7, 2009 8:32 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Please, I beg you. No Rex Grossman

by Roger Dorn on Nov 7, 2009 1:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Where the heck does he come up with these lists? David Greene?? Billy Volek?? Why does MC seem to think that all these players who had about a 5-minute NFL career are really good football players, only nobody knows it but him?

by Buckeye Brad on Nov 7, 2009 8:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You are right Buckeye, we are going against the grain in proclaiming these guys can play professionally. That does mean we would risk giving them more than 5 minutes to prove their NFL worthiness.

by mooncamping on Nov 8, 2009 8:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Where are Aaron Brooks and Jeff Garcia?

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Nov 8, 2009 9:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The list indicates players of interest, players deemed capable of winning.
Fan and club preferences will be respected.
Rex Grossman was ridiculed a lot in Chicago. He is a fiery competitor, though. And I don´t consider his Super Bowl run a fluke. He was not traded from Chicago, before a player of Jay Cutler´s caliber was present. Matt Schaub´s improved play is a direct result of Rex Grossman pushing him for playing time.
I took a risk in listing the players in order of personal preference.
Where I would insert college quarterbacks from next years draft, I can´t say at this early juncture. But I will tell you, that so far they wouldn´t reach above spot four at this point.

by mooncamping on Nov 8, 2009 8:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just because Dilfer won a SB doesn’t mean he carried the team on is back.

I’m pretty sure that offense went out with only 10 people every play.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 8, 2009 11:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If I had a billion dollars, I would surely buy a franchise and make you GM. The pure futility of the team that would ensue would be hilarious.

www.lowbrowsophisticate.com

by kwoog on Nov 7, 2009 11:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As hilarious as the Browns?

by TheRealSlimShady on Nov 8, 2009 9:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Moon’s Erie Dawgs would probably be hilarious in the same way that the Spruce Goose was hilarious. The Browns today are hilarious in the same way that the first Wright Flyer would be hilarious if pressed into active duty at the start of WWI.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Nov 8, 2009 11:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

Start posting about the Browns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Claymatthewsjr_small
Lerner to secure a Czar soon?
Lakeland2_small
The Recession Bowl
Claymatthewsjr_small
Browns Draft Radar.... The Line
Brown-ratterman_small
Peter King Thinks Weiss has a Chance to End Up in Cleveland
7782_small
The only thing to look forward to...
Photo_18_small
The Hit on Browns' Josh Cribbs an Inappropriate Act of Retaliation
Small
Our Job as Fans
Brown-ratterman_small
Gruden to Stay on MNF
Claymatthewsjr_small
Browns Draft Radar.... The Running Backs
Photo_18_small
Jamal Lewis Renounces Browns, Considers Himself a Raven After Retirement

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Canal Street Chronicles
Sports Talk...Unplugged with Kenny Wilkerson
Baltimore Beatdown
Ravens/Colts Friday Injury Report
Mobile Live
Brandon Mebane in the First Quarter and the Optimal Defensive Line, Pt. 2

Browns Links


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Moderators

Pryor_small Buckeye Brad