GOT NUMBERS? Previewing the Browns vs. the Chiefs.
Since my computer blew up and the replacement has yet to come in, this article comes to you by way of a public library computer. That means slow connections and time limits. And a shorter version of my Got Numbers? weekly preview. It also means I won't be able to comment on this DBN until Monday and cannot edit this story, like I usually do. (I can read DBN from my phone, but I haven't successfully posted from it). So, sorry for any typos, spelling mistakes or blatant errors or omissions.
Not that anyone will mind. This week's game features two terrible teams with a combined record of 5-21 this season and 6-26 last year. And very, very few people will even know it is going on. It is blacked out in Kansas City. And it won't be shown in most of Ohio. These two proud franchises and fan bases now have little to cheer for and struggle to make their way to the games.
The Browns are coming off their second win of the season and have played, generally, better football since the bye week. But, let's see just how ugly we can expect this game to be.
As always, all DVOA, DYAR and sack rate numbers are thanks to Football Outsiders.
When the Chiefs have the ball:
Kansas City's offense is bad. They rank 32nd (yes, that's last) in the league in weighted DVOA for offensive efficiency (-28.4%). That means they don't pass well (28th, -23.5%), don't run well (32nd, -14.9%) and have been even worse lately because the weighted stats weight the most recent games more than earlier games in the year. The Browns defense has had borderline great games (Steelers II, Ravens II, Bengals I, Bengals II, Bills) and flat out disgustingly bad games (San Diego, Detroit, Chicago, Green Bay). Some of that is due to injuries, but some is just plain confusing. After dominating the Steelers in the wind and cold last week, the Browns rank 30th in weighted DVOA (up from 32nd). The Browns are 31st against the pass and 27th against the run in DVOA.
Kansas City's passing game is "lead" by Matt Cassel. Cassel has had an awful season. He has been less valuable overall this season than every quarterback with at least 100 passes, except Jamarcus Russel. That's right. Cassel has less total value than Derek Anderson in DYAR this season (-639 for Cassell, -406 for DA). On a per play basis, it is a little better, he is 39th of 44 qualifying QBs (-34.4% DVOA). Still, that's really, really, really bad. And while they haven't played the whole season (because they were midseason acquistions or injured) the Chiefs are not without decent receivers. Both Chris Chambers (-3.7%) and Dwayne Bowe(-3.0%) are right around league average on a per play basis. Though their "other" WRs kind of stink (Mark Bradley -38.8% DVOA and just a 40% catch rate; Bobby Wade, -26.8% DVOA). And they dearly miss Tony Gonzalez. Their best TEs, Leonard Pope and Sean Ryan have been non-factors. This is good news for the Browns because they remain the worst team in the league at defending passes to TEs. Part of the Chiefs problem is protecting the QB. They rank near the bottom of the league, allowing 40 sacks, about 9% of all their drop backs. And if the Browns can build on success in rushing the passer from last Thursday, this could be a big part of the game. The Browns ranked 17th in the league in getting to the quarterback on a per-dropback basis, but that has not been updated by Football Outsiders for last week's games. I'm sure the Browns are now near the top ten.
The Chiefs rushing game is an interesting story. While they rank last in the league in DVOA (mainly due to Larry Johnson's ineffectiveness- but he isn't on the team anymore), Jamaal Charles has broken out as a force on the ground. Despite not being a starting back until week 10, Charles has the 21st most value of all RBs and is 13th on a per play basis (7.7% DVOA). That's largely based on his really good 5.2 YPC. He is also coming off a career game against the Bills, where he rushed for 143 yards on 20 carries (7.2 YPC) and a TD. (Not to mention 7 catches for another 38 yards).
When the Browns have the Ball
The Chiefs are average against the pass, 17th in the league. Particularly, they are good against #1 WRs (8th in the league. As Brady Quinn plays more and more games, he is settling in around just below-league average. He is at -18% DVOA currently.
The Browns rushing game is also confusing to figure out. No current RB on the Browns qualifies for the league leaders on Football Outsiders. Jamal Lewis still leads the team in carries and he was horrible, dragging down the stats. Now that he is on IR, it is tough to gage how good or bad the run game really is. We just don't have much data on Chris Jennings (who has been pretty league average on a per play basis, -4% DVOA) or Jerome Harrison (who has been decidedly worse-20%DVOA). But the real X factor is Josh Cribbs. Football Outisiders classifies him as a QB. His runs come by the way of end-arounds, wild-cat formations, reverses. The creativity has lead to some good-to-great results. He has 305 yards on 42 carries, good for 7.3 YPC. The Browns ground game is key because KC is bad against the run. 29th in the league (8.0% DVOA).
Special teams
Josh Cribbs is awesome. KC has good coverage teams, so don't expect too much.
Conclusions and Questions
There are some rising starts and interesting things to watch, maybe not as ugly as I thought.
Three questions that will determine the outcome:
1.) Can the Browns get to Cassel like they got to Roethlisberger? And if so, will we take the next step and start forcing turnovers?
2.) Will the Browns play with a level of passion and intensity that is anywhere near the level they had for the Steelers at home at night?
3.) Will Jamaal Charles take another step to becomming the next NFL star runningback for the Chiefs?
For the first time since doing this column, I actually like the matchup. I think our strengths and their weaknesses are in the right areas (namely, our pass rush vs. their pass protection; their run game vs. our run defense).
Browns 28
Chiefs 20
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
1.) Can the Browns get to Cassel like they got to Roethlisberger? And if so, will we take the next step and start forcing turnovers?
Not to the tune of 8 sacks.
2.) Will the Browns play with a level of passion and intensity that is anywhere near the level they had for the Steelers at home at night?
I think they will. They know the remaining games are crucial…and jobs are on the line.
3.) Will Jamaal Charles take another step to becomming the next NFL star runningback for the Chiefs?
Not this game. I think he will perform adequately, but neither offense will do much. I’m thinking it’s gonna be one of those our defense is playing well but we can’t score TD’s type of game.
Defense-adjusted Value Over Average.
DVOA is a method of evaluating teams, units, or players. It takes every single play during the NFL season and compares each one to a league-average baseline based on situation. DVOA measures not just yardage, but yardage towards a first down: five yards on third-and-4 are worth more than five yards on first-and-10 and much more than five yards on third-and-12. Red zone plays are worth more than other plays. Performance is also adjusted for the quality of the opponent. DVOA is a percentage, so a team with a DVOA of 10.0% is 10 percent better than the average team, and a quarterback with a DVOA of -20.0% is 20 percent worse than the average quarterback. Because DVOA measures scoring, defenses are better when they are negative.
by johnnyphoenix on Dec 19, 2009 9:28 PM EST up reply actions
This made me laugh. REC.
Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.
by golanbatrac on Dec 20, 2009 10:06 AM EST up reply actions
That’s a terrible comment. Ryan puts a lot of hard work in to these articles and many people here enjoy reading them, so it’s not very nice for you to be criticizing him like that. If you disagree with something he wrote then it’s fair to say that and explain yourself, but don’t just say “what’s your point?” That’s extremely rude.
by Buckeye Brad on Dec 20, 2009 9:18 AM EST up reply actions 5 recs
Recommended.
"Everybody loves progress but not a lot of people love change." - E. Mangini, 12/11/2009
by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Dec 20, 2009 12:46 PM EST up reply actions
By the way, I know some people think you’re funny but to me you’re just rude and annoying, and this is another example of why I think that way. You aren’t even trying to have a discussion about football and tell what you didn’t like about his stats or what you disagree with, you just make a rude comment dismissing his entire post. That’s not funny at all.
You’re not interested in having discussions with people; you just want to post your crazy ramblings and put down anyone who disagrees with you. That’s not what this site is about and it shouldn’t be tolerated, from you or anyone else.
by Buckeye Brad on Dec 20, 2009 9:27 AM EST up reply actions 5 recs
you’re well aware i’m normally a defender of mooncamping, but in this case you’re right, comments like that have no place here.
by notthatnoise on Dec 20, 2009 11:49 AM EST up reply actions
This isn´t the first time that I am shocked by your obnoxious obstinate ostentatiousness.
I don´t know what you´re daily situation is, but using a position of authority to paint things your way is dictatorial.
A moderator should be unbiased, not only are you a bully in the fold, you are slanderous and outright scary in your false righteousness.
Moon, stop being a killjoy. Let everyone enjoy their own take, just as they should allow you yours, eh?
"Everybody loves progress but not a lot of people love change." - E. Mangini, 12/11/2009
by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Dec 20, 2009 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
The next time you post something like this, you’ll be banned for a day or two.
Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.
by Chris Pokorny on Dec 20, 2009 1:03 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Anyone have a line on where to get this game online? Apparently the only 1pm I will have is Jets v Falcons :(.
On another note is slim shady here ever gonna man up and use his BradyQuinnisaBeast login ever again? lol
I’m hopeful about www.rwbsports.com but it hasn’t shown up there yet….
"Everybody loves progress but not a lot of people love change." - E. Mangini, 12/11/2009
by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Dec 20, 2009 12:38 PM EST up reply actions
http://www.vshare.tv/live/24730/sticktvnet/
"Everybody loves progress but not a lot of people love change." - E. Mangini, 12/11/2009
by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Dec 20, 2009 1:04 PM EST up reply actions
Ryan, I am loving this stuff. Keep it coming.
I tend to struggle with this myself, but there is one big fat block of text up there under “When the Chiefs have the ball”. I don’t know about others, but I find it easier to sift through and pick out these stats when things are maybe broken down more in to sections.
I am absolutely going to keep reading these regardless, but that’s just my 2¢.
Good thought. I will try to break diwn big paragraphs and make things a little more reader friendly.
fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com
by Ryan Kelsey on Dec 21, 2009 10:41 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
That’d be my only complaint. Large blocks of text are a pain to read onscreen. Doubly so when there are lots of statistics involved.
Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.
by golanbatrac on Dec 21, 2009 12:18 PM EST up reply actions

























