Two Browns named to FootballOutsiders' All-Rookie Team

The surprise isn't which two rookies, but probably that the 2nd one was named at all.

And yes, FootballOutsiders.com is the only website I read.

about 2 years ago rolub 18 comments 0 recs |

Comments

Massaquoi has shown flashes, my hope is that he becomes an above average 2, but I don’t see him as a number 1 go to threat.

Mack was an easy choice for center, and I would argue has been better than Oher. Oher has had a few poor games, whereas Mack’s only issues this year were the snaps against the Broncos, which he has seemed to fix.

by Roger Dorn on Dec 23, 2009 3:33 PM EST reply actions

Seriously though, for a rookie, regardless of being a center… how impressive is this?

According to our database, Mack hasn’t been penalized once all season.

You are reading my signature.

by rolub on Dec 23, 2009 3:56 PM EST up reply actions

Wow. That is huge.

by Bernie19Kosar on Dec 24, 2009 12:24 AM EST up reply actions

Yay for getting a non-bust first round pick!

by emily522 on Dec 27, 2009 1:07 AM EST up reply actions

Yeah, Mack was a no brainer. Glad they took notice of MoMass as well.

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Dec 23, 2009 3:57 PM EST up reply actions

Oh. My. God.

Thank you rolub for leading me to this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ax0eTTXTSg

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Dec 23, 2009 3:54 PM EST reply actions

Wow. I guess they meant well.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Dec 23, 2009 5:20 PM EST up reply actions

The thing that caught my eye was that Maualuga was on the list for Linebacker with some pretty significant stats. Wouldn’t have been nice to have 3 rookies on that list instead of 2 and a receiver that doesn’t even suit up for most of the games? Well, 2 outta 3 ain’t bad I guess.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Dec 23, 2009 5:19 PM EST reply actions

No thank you on Maualuga.

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Dec 23, 2009 5:36 PM EST up reply actions

Where the hell is Robiskie?!?!

by Buckeye Brad on Dec 23, 2009 6:26 PM EST reply actions 3 recs

Rec for comedic repetition.

by skipkirk on Dec 23, 2009 9:59 PM EST up reply actions

This made me laugh.

by Bernie19Kosar on Dec 24, 2009 12:26 AM EST up reply actions

I’ve been asking myself the same question all season.

Tribe fan trapped in Kansas

by Avindian on Dec 24, 2009 4:01 PM EST up reply actions

This comment applies correctly on every post on this site.

fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com

by Ryan Kelsey on Dec 26, 2009 4:53 PM EST up reply actions

Why is Hakeem Nicks missing the “Wide Receiver:” label? They picked three rookie WRs for there All-Rookie team, correct? If so I think he deserved to be mentioned first, unless of course it isn’t in any particular order. On the other hand if they only picked two WRs, and the third is just some kind of mention, I think Nicks and Harvin are better options, and MoMass to the label-less position.

by Simmsinns on Dec 23, 2009 9:29 PM EST reply actions

Since we’re on the topic of rookies, I’ll paste this here.

39 tackles, a sack and two forced fumbles.

Considering where we took Maiava, those stats are alright.

by skipkirk on Dec 23, 2009 10:02 PM EST reply actions

Honestly, these are almost identical stats to Rey M. if you consider the amount of playing time each has had.

by Roger Dorn on Dec 24, 2009 1:32 AM EST up reply actions

I really like Maiava as a backup/sub package guy. He isn’t big or especially physical, but he can move well and looks to be pretty intelligent.

Count me as ok with picking guys who were productive on good teams in college who “can’t make it in the NFL because they aren’t _ enough”. In the later rounds.

by rufio on Dec 24, 2009 3:32 PM EST up reply actions