The fate of Derek Anderson. No Poll.
As early as the beginning of the 2009 season I was one of the Anderson faithful who still held hope that he could start for the Browns and look reminiscent of his productive 2007 self. This season has shown many things to we the Browns faithful, including the inadequacies of Mr. Anderson as an NFL caliber quarterback. He has poor accuracy and a very limited 'touch' on short passes and quick routes. His decision making is questionable at best, and he has a tendency to throw red zone interceptions. Despite all these flaws, I still feel that he could make a serviceable backup for a team due to his strong arm and good size. And as 2007 showed, he has the ability to look very good when surrounded by talent like Edwards and Winslow (not to mention a running game).
The question remains, where would he fit in with the Browns, if at all? Unless he somehow manages to put up incredible numbers over these final two games, it is very likely that the Browns will try to trade him this off season in an effort to acquire proven talent or more draft choices. What I am especially curious about it where he might end up after this season. So who needs a quarterback? Here's my opinion: (in no particular order)
1. Buffalo Bills - Trent Edwards has been a disappointment again, and the new regime is unafraid to shake things up, like demoting Lynch to a backup role and starting Fitzpatrick over Trent. Fitzpatrick has been O.K. for them, but unimpressive as well. They need a quarterback with potential,and Anderson could be seen in that role by management.
2. Oakland Raiders - Seems to be the most obvious, logical, and hilarious choice. Al Davis is likely to jump out of his snuggie at the idea of a new shiny strong armed quarterback to throw to his track stars when he sees Anderson this Sunday. The Raiders have already tried out Anderson's predecessor as well as his backup (Frye, Gradkowski), so they might as well give the guy in the middle a try. Theoretically, Anderson may actually play well in fair-weather Oakland with some good deep threats and a solid tight end in Zach Miller and the rest of the RRRRRRRaiders.
3. Washington Redskins - A team that seems to be just as hard to figure out as the Browns. Who will be the coach? What will they think of and do with Jason Campbell? Campbell has actually played out a respectable season, on a very bad team, but he tends to get a bad rap for his decision making. The media shows him no love, as well. This destination seems unlikely, but one could see them taking a flyer on Anderson in camp to push Campbell.
4. St. Louis Rams - A team with as many question marks as the Browns do, but lucky enough to have an elite talent in Steven Jackson. 32 year old Marc Bulger has been slumping since he arrived, and they seem to be another squad who might take a chance on Anderson given their obvious struggles in the passing game.
5. San Francisco 49ers - Are they really sold on Alex Smith? I'm not convinced. Another team with respectable weapons that could make Anderson look good if he got a chance to win a job in camp.
That's all the viable starting jobs I could see Anderson coming into, as he could backup many other teams. So what's your opinion? How will Anderson fare against the mortal defenses of Oakland and Jacksonville? Where do you think he will end up? Does anyone actually care? Sorry, no poll. Merry Christmas!
This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Not San Fran. Alex Smith is doing decent this year, plus they have Shaun Hill and Nate Davis
by TheRealSlimShady on Dec 25, 2009 12:11 AM EST reply actions
With the talent the browns started the season with even P.Manning would’ve struggled. As you stated, “DA.has the ability to look very good when surrounded by talent.” DA will perform better than BQ did in the two games the Browns won. In reference to trades DA will receive more value than BQ.
Go Browns 09!!!
ive always thought he would be a good match for the bills. i dont know if they are going to be able to get TO back but he is the kind of target DA needs. The Bills other WR, Lee Evans, is fast and like the long ball as well. With those two deep threats the bills running game could really open up and i have liked the play of both back, Fred Jackson and Marshawn Lynch, in the past.
by The Brown Note on Dec 25, 2009 11:38 AM EST reply actions
I don’t know where, but someone will give DA a shot. He has a huge arm. Teams love that.
As much I as don’t like DA, we are still talking about a league that Charlie Frye, Craig Nall and Bruce Gradkowski are getting starts in.
The Bills and Rams will draft a QB in the first round so they will not be in the running for DA.
Plus, no team out there will want to trade for him and his $7 million contract that he will receive in 2010.
DA will just get cut and good riddance.
http://dawgscooper.blogspot.com/
Dawg Scooper: An Unofficial Cleveland Browns Source
The Bills and Rams would both be smart to not throw a rookie to the wolves, regardless of what happens to DA.
But that’s what they’ll do.
http://dawgscooper.blogspot.com/
Dawg Scooper: An Unofficial Cleveland Browns Source
I agree with Dorn, it’s about time Suh got ready for the Lou (sorry, I promise I didn’t come up with that)
Being a Browns fan isn't always fun but somebody's gotta do it
As much as I love Suh, sometimes the draft is just too far away for some teams.
I have seen stone cold locks for the number one pick go from 1st to 10th from December to April.
by Bernie19Kosar on Dec 26, 2009 5:41 PM EST up reply actions
Since either QB was unresolvable, we went with neither since training camp.
While Brady Quinn showed heart, I think the trophy goes to Derek Anderson for playing as badly as the team actually was. So in a bad year, that´s the MVP, for his dogged determination in portraying an inferior offense. Unfortunately he has tarnished himself in so doing. I won´t concern myself with what other clubs think of him, the 7 million $ is adequate compensation for an immensely bruised ego, and if we could we would pay it if only he could get one last shot with another franchise, he deserves it.
I have considered both tradable since before the draft. It´s harsh but at least it´s honest.
I think Brady Quinn is a good fit for the St. Louis Rams.
Derek Anderson´s laid back style could indeed suit a West Coast team, the Raiders and 49ers mentalities however are different to that. Seahawks anyone?
You play football to win. Not to ‘portray an inferior offense’ if it is inferior.
You’re not a football fan are you? Just a commentator. That may or may not be a bad thing.
Probably the only Cleveland Browns fan in all of Sydney, NSW.
most of this doesn’t make much sense (derek anderson is playing badly on purpose?) but i agree that both have been tradable since before the draft and i also think quinn would work well on the rams.
by notthatnoise on Dec 28, 2009 8:29 AM EST up reply actions
Of course it doesn´t make sense, and it´s for the better, because throwing games is criminal if proven. But honestly what would it matter if he did, there is no one in the NFL that thinks they could have won it they had tried.
It was more of a tongue in cheek argument, saying it would have been honorable to demonstrate to overly avid fans, that given the roster we don´t deserve to win. He´s a big man, even in futility. I wish him luck with a proper support team.
Glad you think Brady Quinn is a good fit with the Rams. I think it´s in our best interests to have him prove he was no fluke in the first round.

by 

















