Dawgs By Nature: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: USA Today / SB Nation Consensus MMA Rankings for October

Draft Discussion

Let's take this opportunity to consolidate draft related discussions. Place your comments on positional needs and priorities, as well as player discussions here. That way, we can be efficient about how we waste time until the draft. Let's keep this rec'd to the top so we can keep our thoughts all in one place.

 

Star-divide

In order to fulfill fanpost obligatory length, here's a little bit of Cleveland Browns fan conditioning:

 

Failure_medium

 

Tick...tick...tick...tick... The waiting is the worst part.

7 recs  |  Comment 267 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

to kick things off:

i do not want maualuga at 5. i’d rather have both cushing and matthews (the other 1st round USC LB’s), as maualuga is dramatically unsound from a fundamentals perspective and has made his rep on making huge hits.

if curry’s there, which seems impossible, he has to be the pick.

seems to me the conversation is likely to come down to raji and orakpo (assuming we don’t make a trade). i think crab will be there now, but i’m starting to convince myself that the ManKok era will not start with the drafting of a WR. that said, i’m down on orakpo, and don’t know much about raji.

as for the 2 2nd rounders…i believe you have to come out of the first 2 rounds w/ 2 LBs and either an OL or RB.

discuss.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 5, 2009 2:36 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

As a BC alum, I can tell you Raji is incredible and would be worth taking at number 5. I just don’t know if that is enough to justify not doing something to satisfy our awful linebacking corps

by Roger Dorn on Mar 5, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I do love the idea of going back to back LBs in the second round, just as a concept. I’m fine with not going LB because A) we can’t automatically pick the best LB available and B) star LBs can be found later in the draft.

The #5 pick, whoever it is, needs to be able to impact the team right away. It should really be BPA at OLB, DE, DT, CB, or WR.

The TE, S, C, OG, FB, and K/P positions do not provide enough impact to justify a #5 pick. RB is a position that rarely provides that impact – Peterson, Tomlinson, etc.. – and there just isn’t one of those backs in this draft. I think the same goes for MLB. LT we’re doing just fine at, while RT is solid enough. QB would create disruptive competition.

For offense, that leaves WR, which is a position that’s almost like RB but is probably safer in that it’s less likely to find a bust. That could be a mis-perception on my part, but that’s a separate discussion. The only WR that has a good enough chance to provide enough star power to justify the high cost at #5 is Crabtree.

On defense, we could use players at all the positions that can typically provide top 5 pick caliber impact: DE, DT, OLB, and CB. Best player available.

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 5, 2009 3:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

can raji play the end in the 3-4 and move over to NT when rogers is done?

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 5, 2009 6:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve been wondering that as well. With Rogers taking two (or three) linemen, and Raji taking two more, there’s not much left to stop our OLBs (which there are plenty of further down the draft. The YouTube clip of him tackling a running back with his own lineman is pretty amusing.

by NM Dawg on Mar 5, 2009 6:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i really have a feeling Raji will be taken by seattle anyway, especially since they filled up their WR need with housh and lost rocky bernard to the giants

by sww2109 on Mar 5, 2009 6:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely. Rogers could play end, too. Both are massive AND quick. The quick part is what separates Raji from his teammate and fellow 330lber Ron Brace.

Preferably, Raji would play LE in a 3-4 if he has to play end. If Corey Williams can lose 20 lbs and regain the quickness he had in GB, he could play RE in Ryan’s defense.

Any “undersized” DTs who are “3-techniques”, “gap-shooters”, etc. should be looked at for RE in (what I believe will be) our scheme, as well as huge DEs like Tyson Jackson out of LSU.

by rufio on Mar 5, 2009 11:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just please don’t draft Rey Rey. Please.

by gahnki on Mar 5, 2009 2:48 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I would gladly take Cushing and Matthews, I think we could trade down and get both.

by cboldt12 on Mar 5, 2009 4:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Nice way to kick things off. I also agree that Maualuga is hype and also a “head case”. I think it will be Orakpo but would pick Curry if there or Crabtree if he is there but Curry gone. Does anyone realize that our offense was ranked 31st last year? Only Cincy was worse and Palmer was gone all year long. Everyone is crying for defense, but our offense is the bigger need. I would take a RB with #2, possibly McCoy but would jump all over Wells if there. I saw some tape of him and he did look like he approached Jim Brown. Of course, Brown was the greatest RB ever.

by paulbip on Mar 5, 2009 6:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I just read that the browns are going down to texas to work out Orakpo on the 18th.

by paulbip on Mar 5, 2009 7:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Saying our defense was ranked 31st is extremely mis-leading. We had a quarterback change followed by quarterback injures that reduced our offense to moot. Why would you qualify Cinci’s ranking but not our own?

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 5, 2009 7:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you meant offense, of course, but the point remains.

on offense, we could improve substantially with a select player or two (RB, OG, WR), while on defense we need significant upgrades at several positions in order to advance to a more competitive level.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 5, 2009 8:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Si

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 6, 2009 10:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Round 1 in my preferred order:
1. CURRY
2. Raji
3. Crabtree
4. Jenkins
5. Get the hell out of the pick!

Round 2, pick 1 (depending on round 1 pick):
1. Matthews, Cushing, Laurinitas, etc. best available LB
2. V. Davis, A. Smith, DJ Moore or best CB or Safety

Tough to predict at 50!

by bellar on Mar 5, 2009 9:02 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Don’t you all remember that the Browns set a life long league record for most consec. quarters without an offense TD. Our line sent 3 QB’s to the hospital and we ranked 31st in offense. These are facts that rank our offense worse than our defense.

by paulbip on Mar 5, 2009 9:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

your first statement is just not factual (the td’s thing). to say that our line sent 3 qb’s to the hospital is laughable. quinn hit his finger on a helmet…something that could pretty much happen on any play; anderson was actually not injured by a defensive player…it was the lineman who fell into him, which is also something that could pretty much happen on any play; dorsey…well, dorsey was built like jimmy fallon, so it’s hard to put too much on the line.

you plug one non-LT into the o-line (and therefore a non-first round OL), and you improve there MASSIVELY. you pick up a second back to split the load w/ jamal, and the run game improves massively. rucker turns out to be a player, and the passing game remains in tact.

on defense, you need at least 2 new LBs (kam and d’q barely make the cut); you definitely need one new lineman (can we count on robaire coming back?); you need a safety to replace jones; you should get another corner to move mcdonald to top-shelf nickel back, as opposed to bottom-half corner.

qb’s getting hurt, anderson’s play deteriorating, joe j being hurt, stallworth being hurt, edwards being hurt, steinbach getting nicked, tucker getting nicked…these are all mitigating factors in the dramatic drop off of our offense. i’m not saying the offense is good, but with a little better injury luck and a player or two, you have an intergalactic improvement. the defense overachieved, and to improve you need at least 5 players.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 5, 2009 9:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This.

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 6, 2009 10:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t you remember that we were starting Ken Dorsey and Gradcowski? Once Brady and DA went down, the offensive season was over.

by rufio on Mar 5, 2009 11:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Of course you do, I didn't read the end of your post.

But the lack of any offense late in the year was due to injuries at QB either way. Let the QBs get healthy and give the offense a chance before you start cutting people because the offense didn’t do well.

by rufio on Mar 5, 2009 11:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry bud but no way Matthews or Cushing is available when we select in Round 2. I cannot stand Laurinitus and can see him falling into the 2nd round but hopefully Atlanta takes him in Rd 1. Also, he is not a 3-4 LB.

Also, Vontae Davis is the #1 rated DB.. No way he falls to Round 2. Alphonso and Moore are also projected 1st Round prospects and we all know the 1st Rd always accumulates 5-7 DB’s so these guys will all be gone.

Round 2 – Pick 1
- Donald Brown – RB
- Brian Robiske – WR
- Larry English – OLB
- Clint Sintim – OLB

Round 2 – Pick 2
- Marcus Freeman – LB
- Shonn Green -RB
- William Moore – S
- Jamon Merideth – OT

Just my 2 cents.

by AaronD on Mar 5, 2009 10:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That is what cracks me up about mock drafts, if you combine them all then about 50 players will be drafted in the first. I guaarantee 1 of the the corner is available and there are many projections that have Matthews going in two. I really think Robiske is over rated and hope we don’t go that direction.

by bellar on Mar 5, 2009 10:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d like to see us get Robiskie with the 50th pick. He made some nice catches in college and he’s faster than most people think. I think he’d be a good #3 WR and maybe even a #2. He’s at least as good as Gonzo.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 6, 2009 9:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

do we have a 40-time for him? wr and db are the only positions for which i consider the 40 to be highly relevant.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 6, 2009 11:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Robiskie's 40 time

I believe it was in the 4.50 range, but the fact that he is a posesion reciever and good route runner makes up for his slower time IMO.

by JDfromCLE on Mar 15, 2009 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

At his pro day, scouts had him between 4.49 and 4.52. Not going to just outrun people deep, but plenty fast enough to get open with good routes, savvy, and intelligence.

by rufio on Mar 15, 2009 2:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d stay away from Robiskie. He couldn’t get separation from Big 10 CB’s. He could make some great catches- but I don’t see him being a Braylon Edwards type, I don’t see him being a burner, and I don’t see him being a possession receiver. I’d take a flier on him, maybe, but not in the first two rounds.

by DaytonDogg on Mar 6, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is how I feel about him.

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 6, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A lot of this, I think, is OSU’s scheme.

the WRs at OSU run a LOT of vertical routes where they basically have to just run by CBs. Robiske is a phenomenal route runner for a draft prospect; he needs to be able to set his guy up and change direction in order to be most effective. He will not simply blow by a guy that often, which is why Big-10 CBs could just give him a big cushion and stay behind him. He still beat some of them deep, and can be a threat to catch the long ball because he will use subtle body positioning, great hands, and timing to get the ball.

He ran a 4.49 at the combine—not horrible, probably about average.

I agree with Brad that he would probably be a great value at 50, but don’t think he is as good as Gonzo.

by rufio on Mar 6, 2009 2:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Saying he couldn’t get separation is one of the most fallacious arguments out there on him. A majority of the Big Ten plays zone coverage at all times. When someone tells me how you gain separation against zone coverage then you can say that.

Robo is excellent at disengaging at the top of his route. Very good on fly routes and deep comebacks because of this.

by gahnki on Mar 6, 2009 3:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Freeman is probably as good of a fit as Lauranaitis in the 3-4.

by rufio on Mar 5, 2009 11:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Could also add – Darius Butler – DB from Uconn to the list.

by AaronD on Mar 5, 2009 10:06 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I said it before, here it is again;

The premier players clearly above the rest in this draft are:
Curry
Stafford
Sanchez
Jason Smith
and maybe
Crabtree
Raji

We should not even consider Smith, Stafford, or Sanchez at #5—barring any trades of Thomas or Quinn and DA.

Because of our needs, I might consider Orakpo with the 5th pick. If we aren’t going to pick him, Raji, Crabtree, or by some miracle Curry, we should look hard to trade down, even for less than the draft value chart says to.

For the first pick in round two, we should look to get the best player available, weighted toward LB, RE, OL, or DB. We should weight it more heavily toward whatever we didn’t get in the 1st. For fun, here are some names:
OL Alex Mack or any of the bazillion OTs projected to go in the 1st
LBs Matthews, Cushing, Connor Barwin, Larry English, Maybin, Maualuga, Paul Kruger
DEs Tyson Jackson, Peria Jerry
DBs Louis Delmas, Alphonso Smith, Jenkins if he is in free-fall
WRs Heyward-Bey, Nicks
RBs Moreno, Wells if they happen to drop this far

The second pick in Round 2 should be more purely the best player available, hopefully after we have filled a few dire needs:
LBs any of the above, David Veineuke, Cody Brown, Clint Sintim, Lawrence Sidbury,
DBs D.J. Moore, Sean Smith, Darius Butler,
DL Jarron Gilbert, Ron Brace, Fili Moala, SenDerrick Marks, Rickey Jean-Francois, Terrance Taylor, Alex Magee
TE Shawn Nelson, Jared Cook
WR Brian Robiskie, Ramses Barden, Massaquoi
RBs Donald Brown, Rashad Jennings, Andre Brown, Shonn Greene, Glenn Coffee, Javarris Williams
OL Phil Loadholt, Xavier Fulton, Duke Robinson, Eric Wood, maybe Max Unger

That’s my 2¢

by rufio on Mar 6, 2009 12:05 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I agree with this, nice analysis. 5th pick has to be one of Crabs, Raji, Curry, Orakpo

by Roger Dorn on Mar 6, 2009 12:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Who do we have on offense that can play? We have the LOT, LG, possibly a QB, and Fullback. All the rest are washed up or overrated. BE? Most drops by a WR in NFL.

by paulbip on Mar 6, 2009 9:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Most drops by a WR doesn’t matter if he’s catching other passes. That’s like knocking a guy in baseball for having the most K’s — who cares if he’s getting on base and hitting homers? I know Edwards had too many drops last year, but that was all mental. I think he’ll get it cleared up in the offseason and come back next year as a great reciever again — maybe not as good as ’07 but close.

But we do need help on offense just as much as on defense, so I agree with you on that part. That’s why I don’t mind drafting Crabtree because he will be a big upgrade at WR and give our QB two good recieving threats. And we need to look for a RB in the 2nd round (or 3rd if we can trade for a pick there). So I don’t agree with the people who think we just need to pick defensive players with out top picks.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 6, 2009 9:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There’s a difference between having a hole and having an opportunity to upgrade. Just because we don’t have a superstar in a position doesn’t mean it should be targeted in the first round. RT is fine. RG is fine. C is adequate. WR depth would be great if we got Crabtree. TE is fine as well, especially given the lack of emphasis on TE pass catching in our new offense. Of course, we could use depth.

Defense, on the other hand, we have one ROLB – a 7th round pick who may or may not be adequate. We have two ILB, one borderline average and one that couldn’t beat out Andra Davis. We could really use an upgrade at CB2, but short of that have an absolute need at CB3. We also only have one starting safety. Our starting RE may have suffered a career ending injury, so that’s a hole. So, RE, SS and CB are legit holes. ROLB AND ILB are as close to holes as possible, and at minimum need more bodies.

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 6, 2009 11:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

At pick 5 though what other offensive player would you justify taking except Crabtree?

by Roger Dorn on Mar 6, 2009 12:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No one, except a OT is worth that spot. All the RBs have question marks, all the other WRs have question marks, all the QBs have question marks and we already have too many QBs.

by rufio on Mar 6, 2009 2:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jerome Harrison, maybe Rucker, the whole right side of the line works if Tucker is healthy, Heiden. Offensive players can be found later.

by rufio on Mar 6, 2009 2:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How many yards did Harrison gain last year? How about Rucker? How many games has tucker played in the last 3 years?

by paulbip on Mar 6, 2009 8:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just because a player didn’t play doesn’t necessarily mean that he didn’t deserve to play.

I have a rebuttal question for you. How many yards per touch did Jerome Harrison have last year?

by Roger Dorn on Mar 6, 2009 8:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have an answer…Homer Jones…He had about 90 yards per touch for the Browns.

by paulbip on Mar 6, 2009 10:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And the year before…

by rufio on Mar 7, 2009 12:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I forgot to mention that Heiden is injured and so is JJ. That leaves a WR that can’t catch and another that’s a bust. And this ain’t baseball where catching 4 passes out of ten is considered Hall of Fame.

by paulbip on Mar 6, 2009 8:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Putting Stallworth back in the “NE offense” should make him at least palatable as a 3rd or 4th receiver. TO “can’t catch” either (look at his career stats vs Braylon), but despite his ridiculous locker room problems, he is still a viable NFL threat at age 35—Braylon will be better than last year. Heiden and JJ might be injured NOW, but the Browns don’t play football for a long time. We shouldn’t count on either to be a world-beater, but I think getting one of the two on any given Sunday back to their reliable old selves isn’t stupidly optimistic.

Who did the Titans have on offense last year? They did alright, didn’t they? The Dolphins? The Ravens?

Building a roster the right way means not making big reaches for players just because they play offense. The talent that will be there at #5 will mostly be on the defensive side of the ball.

We put up 27 on Baltimore, 23 on Jacksonville, and 35 on NYG last year. That shows me that we have enough offensive firepower to compete with any team. When our offense is healthy, and the talent is used creatively, our offense is much much better than our D. This was a 4-12 team last year, a lot of changes need to be made, but the talent of the players on D is simply lower across the board than that of the offensive players. You can feel free to disagree with that, but you are going to have a very hard time convincing me otherwise.

by rufio on Mar 7, 2009 12:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If Stafford goes number 1 to the Lions, then obviously one of those 5 will be available to us at #5.

by talonk on Mar 6, 2009 10:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I can see them taking Jason Smith and then trying to get the QB from Kansas State at #20, or not drafting a QB till later.

by rufio on Mar 6, 2009 2:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Great analysis as always, rufio. I agree with Dorn about the 5th pick. I don’t know much about Orakpo and I’m a little wary of him, but if he looks good in workouts and Mangini likes him then I can support that pick. I don’t know much about Raji but he sounds like a great lineman. I don’t know if he’ll fit in our defense with Rogers, but if you guys this he will then he could be a good choice. A dominating D-line would greatly help our LB’s.

I would love Curry but I think he’ll be gone, and you guys know how I fell about Crabtree. So any of those four look good to me.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 6, 2009 9:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Buckeye Brad, we really agree on everything. My choices would be Curry, Crabtree. If those two are gone, that means we get a stud OT or Raji or Orakpo. The Browns are going to work out Orakpo on the 18th. The only safe bet here would be the stud OT but I don’t think the Browns would take him. It would be nice to trade down and I would be talking to Det for #20, their 2nd round this year and a 3rd next year. That works out perfect on the value chart. Det needs a QB and that stud OL and this would enable them to pick them up in this draft.

by paulbip on Mar 6, 2009 11:23 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

It would be nice to trade down and I would be talking to Det for #20, their 2nd round this year and a 3rd next year.

That would be a bit beyond nice and reaching into super awesome happy fun time.

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 6, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i still can’t understand how people can say we should take a stud OT at 5. we already have one of those.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 6, 2009 11:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I know this is a draft feed, but what are thoughts about Freddy Keiaho? An inexpensive, experienced LB who can play inside and out. I am still curious about Bell, and think he may have a better year in 2009 if he gets over the knee injuries.

by NM Dawg on Mar 6, 2009 12:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think Keiaho is just a poor fit in our scheme. He is maybe big enough to play in the Colts’ Cover-2 scheme that needs really quick LBs (and can sacrifice size for speed). We need fast LBs too, but they need to be big enough to take on OL at times. Maybe he would work inside next to Jackson, but I don’t think he would. Rob Ryan and Mangini would know a lot better than me, though.

by rufio on Mar 6, 2009 2:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Browns resign Safety Adams

I thought he was worth keeping.

by paulbip on Mar 6, 2009 1:23 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Seemed cheap enough, and with Jones looking around, we need bodies at S.

by rufio on Mar 6, 2009 2:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jonesy signed a one year deal with the Iggles

by Roger Dorn on Mar 6, 2009 4:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Damn…

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 6, 2009 5:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Orakpo = Oh no

Vision of Mike Junkin, Tim Couch and other busts always pop into my head. I don’t like it. Great point on Beau Bell made earlier, I almost forgot about him!

by bellar on Mar 6, 2009 3:58 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I am a Penn State fan, so Buckeyes don’t kill me here. I think Dieon Butler would be a good chance in 7th round, I think he will last that long, just a shot. He ran the 4th fastest 40 ever posted at the combine. He is not big, but he does not drop balls and could fill in as an extra receiver.
 Now if Crabtree falls to us at 5, that would be my pick. I would have to say my order would be:
 Curry
Crabtree
Raji
Orakpo
 As hard as it is to trade down, I can see the Browns on the phone trying to make that move. I think they will use every second on the clock for that first round pick.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Mar 6, 2009 7:41 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I actually think that would be an excellent pick in the 7th round.

by gahnki on Mar 6, 2009 10:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am on board, but his 40 was not the 4th fastest ever I don’t think. Chris Johnson, Heyward Bey, Rogers-Cromartie, Justin King, and Orlando Scandrick all ran faster by the numbers I saw. Where did you see his 40 time and what was it?

The kid is clearly fast, and the 40 is clearly not the best measure of “game speed”, I am just wondering if there is a better source out there then what I am looking at.

by rufio on Mar 7, 2009 12:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This what I read from the Patriot News out of Harrisburg PA, they said he ran a 4.25, I do not know the exact date. Paper also stated the Maurice Evans (DE) should of stayed in school and Maybin was so-so in his work outs.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Mar 7, 2009 7:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If we can get a 4.25 guy outside of the second round, I will be 100% thrilled.

by rufio on Mar 7, 2009 8:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve been reading increasing news of Edwards being traded. I don’t put too much stock in them, but at least one article discussed the fact that he is unlikely to remain a Brown when his contract is up, which does not surprise me. If this is the case, wouldn’t it be smarter to get his replacement now, so they have time to get up to speed before Edwards leaves? How many in the draft seem like they could fill his shoes (assuming Edwards remembers he has hands in the next year)? Does that increase Crabtree’s value to the Browns?

by NM Dawg on Mar 7, 2009 5:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

If you really knew for sure that he was leaving, it would be worth it to try to get his replacement now. That said, not a lot of WRs are as talented as Braylon and it would be hard to do. I think we should try to get another WR regardless of Braylon’s status, but it might cause us to move guys like Crabtree, Heyward-Bey, Nicks, Kenny Britt or Robiskie up on our draft board.

I also don’t think you can count on him as being gone. If he and Mankok feel each other out and the season starts out well I think we sould offer him a bunch of money. If he had to resign or test FA right now I think he would walk, but there is a whole year between now and when he would leave.

by rufio on Mar 7, 2009 8:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Brad, where did this side of you come from? I’ll rec to that

by joeee on Mar 8, 2009 4:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d like to keep him, for both his talent and continuity. Hopefully, he won’t be too much of a headache for Mangini. It seems clear Mangini has little tolerance for egos.
On the subject of a large offers and cap space, I’m starting to think that the low-key free agency approach is a result of having to keep the remaining cap space free for their draft picks, rather than just an unwillingness. They can’t risk coming up short of funds once they’ve drafted those top three (or more, if they trade for more picks). If they have money left after the draft, perhaps they’ll pick up more players in free agency then.

by NM Dawg on Mar 8, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only draft pick the Browns need to worry about signing in the 5th pick because those are the only rookies that get a big contract. Any pick after the first round doesn’t sign for enough much money that the team should worry about it. And the Browns should know about how much the 5th pick should go for because they usually get about 5-10% more than last year’s pick got, so I don’t think they’re worried about signing their draft picks. They have plenty of cap space for that. If they had two top-15 picks, then they might worry about having enough money to sign them because those are the guys who get the big money.

I think the silence in the free agent market is because they just don’t see any players worth the money they will demand for this team right now. I think they’re more focused on stocking draft picks and building this team through the draft than overspending on free agents.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 8, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It does seem odd, then, that players like Canty, Stacy Andrews, Olshansky, etc did not get more consideration.
I haven’t observed post-draft free agency much in past years. How much house cleaning to teams do after the draft? Is it possible there will be another wave of decent released players to pick from then?

by NM Dawg on Mar 8, 2009 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have no idea if the economy or salary cap have anything to do with the lack of FA signings (which is possible), but Kokinis should know what he is doing when it comes to FAs. I don’t remember Baltimore signing any really big busts in free agency, which is really what you want to avoid. There may have just been no players that Mankok considered worth what other people were offering.

by rufio on Mar 8, 2009 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that is the case. I trust that Kokinis knows what he’s doing in free agency from his days in Baltimore. They’ve always been good at picking up good players on the cheap.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 8, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

my refrain with braylon, as with all the players on this team, has been that we have to maximize his value to the organization…and that may be best realized in a trade. i don’t want to see us move him, but if the ManKok can acquire 2 impact players, or the opportunity to acquire 2-3 players who may become impact contributors, then you have to ship him out. kiwi + a first rounder, to me, is a deal that is a no-brainer, especially when considering the likelihood of edwards trying to leave cleveland after this year.

that said, there are no players in this draft who can fill his shoes at the receiver position.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 8, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Safety?

Are we thinking that Adams is the plan at safety and what if Pool continues with the whole concussion thing? Their hasn’t been much talk about drafting a safety and I haven’t heard about any potential prospects in the draft (other than moving Jenkins to safety). There are still a couple second-tier free agaents available like Bigby (Packers) and Landry (Ravens) or veteran stopgaps (Darren Sharper or Mike Brown) until we can draft Taylor Mays next year.
Another interesting thought…can we draft the kid from Florida State in a later round even though he isn’t intending on playing this season and retain his rights for next season when he is finished with his Rhodes Scholar work.

by bellar on Mar 8, 2009 10:46 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Make Cribbs a safety. His numbers on offense were only average.

by paulbip on Mar 8, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that should only take, what, a day or two in practice? you make it sound like that’s easily done. cribbs at safety definitely can’t and won’t be our plan for 2009, at least.

rhodes scholarship is 2 years.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 8, 2009 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Edwards won’t be traded. No team will pay that high of a price for him after the problems he had last year. If he plays up to his ability this year, the team will have to decide if they want to keep him.

FA’s are going to be difficult to get. Some will go anywhere if the money is right, others only to teams that have a legitimate shot at the post season.

by Will Amingo17 on Mar 8, 2009 10:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

todd mcshay (who may be a larger douche than kiper) has us taking Orakpo at 5, for whatever that’s worth. he also said, “i still have maybin above orakpo on my board, even though maybin struggled at the end of the season and didn’t have a great combine.” so, what you’re saying, todd, is that you have no ability to objectively judge these guys.

i’ve said before, i’m down on orakpo, and not just b/c of his definition of versatility. it’s his size, mostly.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 11, 2009 1:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Mcshay is an a hole

by Roger Dorn on Mar 11, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve never seen someone so universally hated. Every fanbase hates him. And I thnk Kiper does as well. He always makes fun of him.

by gahnki on Mar 11, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

6’3", 263 is pretty prototypical for that rush LB position, I would say. Ware is 6’4", 262. Merriman 6’4", 272 before getting caught ‘roiding. Terrell Suggs 6’3" 260, Adalius Thomas 6’2" 270, Vrabel 6’4" 261, Woodley 6’2", 265.

All within 1" and 10 lbs of Orakpo. I am more worried about his lower body strength and durability than anything.

by rufio on Mar 11, 2009 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My ideal first 4 rounds

1st round- If Curry is gone, we need to find a way to get Maualuga and a few more picks. I don’t care what people say, Rey will be a playmaker in the NFL.

2nd round- With our 1st pick in the 2nd rd go after Clay Matthews Jr. Ihope he’s still there when we pick early in the 2nd round.

2nd rd part 2- With the pick we got from TB, I think we should keep the focus on defense and go after DT Fili Moala from USC. Some people might question this but, I think we still need more depth on our d-line. S. Smith is a bum. R. Smith is coming off a serious surgery and Maola could play either end or tackle in the 3-4.

4th round- I believe we need to look at a replacement for Jamal at this point and I have someone of interest. The guy is Adrian Foster from Tennessee. He’s 6’ 235, a bruiser with speed and hands. His change of direction isn’t great but, with a 4th rd pick I believe he’s worth the risk.

by CTWN4LIFE on Mar 11, 2009 5:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

what…no USC RB’s to take in the 4th? the talent at SC is obviously overflowing, but suggesting we take 3 SC defenders in the first 50 picks seems a bit much, not least b/c Rey is WILDLY overrated at 5.

i think you mean Arian Foster…not Adrian.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 11, 2009 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only guy from USC I really, really want is Brian Cushing. Moala is interesting just because he was projected as the number one pick overall after last years draft. I will try and see if I can find the link.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 11, 2009 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I found it but it is an ESPNsider article (a McShay Nugget), so here is the first 15…

1. Falcons; Fili Moala
2. Lions; Micheal Johnson
3. Chiefs; Matt Stafford
4. Dolphins; Al Woods
5. Bengals; Sen’Derrick Marks
6. Raiders; Andre Smith
7. Bears; Tim Tebow
8. 49ers; Michael Oher
9. Rams; Rey Mauluaga
10. Jets; Knowshon Moreno
11. Titans; Mike Crabtree
12. Texans; Malcom Jenkins
13. Broncos; James Laurinitis
14. Ravens; Vonte Davis
15. Eagles; Derius Heyward-Bey

He had the Browns taking Ricky Sapp from Clemson at 23.

You could make the case that only 5-6 of those guys will be taken in the entire first round this year. And McShay thought that 5 playoff teams would be picking in the top 15.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 11, 2009 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

To be fair, it wasn’t just McShay — nobody though the Falcons or Dolphins would be that good. But Tim Tebow in the top 10?? Really??

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2009 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah I have no idea what he was thinking with Tebow there.

I think the above speaks to the risk-reward of picking a guy like Marks, Moala, or Johnson. Their stock dropped probably by a full round in only one year largely because they don’t play up to their potential on a consistent basis, but they clearly have potential.

by rufio on Mar 11, 2009 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

matthews is a total stud. you should want him on the browns, too (but not at the 5th pick)

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 11, 2009 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

1.Arian Foster is not a bruiser. He doesn’t run with consistent body lean and runs smaller than his size would indicate. He also weighed in at the combine at 226, not 235. I wouldn’t be against getting him in the 4th, but if he really was a “bruiser with speed and hands” who weighed 235 and is less than a thousand yards from being Tennesee’s all-time leading rusher, don’t you think he would project as a 1st rounder?

2. There is no way Moala could play NT in our 3-4. No way. He could be a very good DE in our scheme and play either LDE or RDE depending on how much more aggressive we get.

3. Cushing and Matthews could both be good players for us. I doubt either will be there in the 2nd. But would be absolutely happy if we picked Matthews there.

by rufio on Mar 11, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Foster had a rough year (who didn’t at UT?), but I like him in the late rounds. The SBN Mock Draft guy had the Browns taking him in the first a few months ago, and I called him crazy then. It had everything to do with the round and little to do with his talent level.

by gahnki on Mar 11, 2009 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree and my point remains that he is simply not Adrian Peterson (that big, that fast, that physical). Maybe he can start in the league, and maybe he could even be a 1000yd rusher especially behind a zone blocking scheme.

He would instantly be better than Jason Wright, but I don’t know if I would let Harrison or even Lewis go for Foster.

by rufio on Mar 12, 2009 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can not wait any longer for this draft. I like Michael Johnson but only at 37 or lower. Things could get very interesting depending on who slides out of the first round. Clay Matthews would be awesome as well. Coin flip for Crabtree or Evrette Brown on the first pick. What might be more appealing if we traded the 5th pick for a teen pick and a 2nd rounder. I would love to get one more pick and get either a RB or WR to add to this defensive draft.

On an aside, is anyone intrigued by Ken Lucas being released?

Baseball fans are junkies, and their heroin is the statistic. - Robert S. Wieder

by jerseywahoo on Mar 11, 2009 10:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

1st. No way on Evertte Brown. We already have one DE from FSU that runs around blocks.

2nd. I would kill for a trade down. The only player that I like at 5 is Crabtree. If it is not Crabtree I would trade down ten spots for a 2nd rounder no questions asked.

3rd. Hell yes I am interested in Ken Lucas. But he didn’t play for the Jets, so Mankok has no intrest.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 11, 2009 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brown doesn’t even seem as explosive off the line or agile as Wimbley. I don’t like that pick either.

by rufio on Mar 12, 2009 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Taking the best fits is what is best. Nowhere did I say take Rey with the 5. I said if Curry isn’t there find a way to trade down and pick up some more picks and then take Rey. If we can’t trade down take an OT. Do people seriously think Moala can’t play NT? How big is Shaun Smith? 6’2 320??? With what 4 or 5 years exp in the nfl? Moala is 6’3 305-310?? I’m not saying he will start at NT, cuz we have a monster there already, I’m just saying to give Rogers a blow he’d be servicable. If he’s there when we pick at 50 we should take him. To whoever was bashing me about taking 3 USC guys with the top 5 picks….Imagine this Moala, Rogers, Williams in the front 3. Matthews, Maualuga, Jackon and Wimbley for our LB core. I’m not saying I’m an expert but, to me that would be a very young and talented group of guys to build a D around. With Eric Wright and McDonald having anotehr year of exp….Our D could be solid. Especially with the depth we’ve been adding. Foster would be a nice pick up in the 4th, don’t really care what people say. I do believe. And sorry I was off of his weight by 8 pounds, he at once was at 235.

by CTWN4LIFE on Mar 12, 2009 12:06 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Shaun Smith arguably can’t play NT either. Rogers is listed at 350, and he says he was playing at 360, and I bet his weight was upwards of that at times last year. Moala weighed in at 305 and he probably tried to gain weight for the combine because I saw him listed in the 280s and 290s prior to that.

You might have a better argument by talking about Vince Wolfork or Casey Hampton, both listed at 325. However, Wolfork is a lot stouter at 6’1+", as is Hampton at 6’1" (vs. Moala’s 6’4", a lot closer to Rogers). Also, there is no way Hampton plays at 325, he is way above that.

He would probably make a great RDE in our scheme. I just don’t see him packing on 50 or so pounds after college and becoming a NT. Beyond simple size, he doesn’t play like a NT. His ESPN scouting report reads “Needs to be more stout at the point. Turns his back too much and gets rooted off the line of scrimmage.” That isn’t a NT.

I would like to draft the kid, play him at RDE in our 3-4 and move him inside to DT in passing situations. He just is not a NT.

by rufio on Mar 12, 2009 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously, is it really that hard to figure out how to use the reply button?!?! You’ve posted on here enough that you should know that by now. It’s not that hard, really, and it makes it much easier to follow conversations. Don’t you notice that everyone else uses it?

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 12, 2009 7:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

don banks from cnnsi.com says we take everette brown at 5 b/c he hears “the Browns don’t like [Orakpo] all that much.”

BOOOO

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 12, 2009 1:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

if we don’t like him that much then why are we having him work out specially for our scouts? i like orakpo much more than brown, orakpo to me seems like a boom or bust guy. either he’s the next big pass rusher in the league or a nobody. anyway, kiper’s new draft has us taking raji at 5, which if he’s there i am all for. can you imagine him, rogers, and (hopefully he’ll be as good as we thought he would this year with a year in the 3-4 under his belt) corey williams? that would surely free up wimbley and whatever other OLB we have for sacks

by sww2109 on Mar 12, 2009 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that Brown is going to be a bust. Watch some FSU tape. Reminds me of Jamal Reynolds. FSU has not produced a big time legit NFL DLineman in quite sometime unless I am forgetting someone. I can only think of Darnell Dockett and he is a bad ass.

The busts on the other hand remain numerous (Broderick Bunkley, who the Browns were rumored to be interested in amongst others.)

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 12, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bunkley is a decent player already with phenomenal upside.

I still don’t like Brown. I might consider him with our first second round pick, but I probably would have him below Connor Barwin and maybe even Larry English on my big board. Orakpo and Maybin are the top two guys at that position by a longshot in my eyes.

by rufio on Mar 12, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

OSU has their pro day tomorrow. Little tidbit: they are planning on running on the turf, not the track. They want to prove that the Indy track was slow and their true times are better.

It will be interesting to see the results.

by gahnki on Mar 12, 2009 5:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I thought they always ran indoors on that turf?

by rufio on Mar 12, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, that track is actually notoriously fast. It was put in specifically for the 40. The current plan is to run on the actual turf inside the indoor practice facility which is more similar to the one at the combine.

And it’s kind of funny that you used Roy Hall’s video. Fast track, indeed!

by gahnki on Mar 12, 2009 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That whole set of 40s was just weird. Roy Hall ran the same time as Ginn, and Zwick ran as fast as Troy Smith.

So they will be running on the actual indoor football field, then?

I knew OSU had a notoriously fast “track”, but I thought the “track” was actually made of some type of turf. Regardless, I hope all the OSU guys improve on their times from the combine on a similar surface.

Any word on any other pro days that happened already?

by rufio on Mar 13, 2009 1:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That whole set of 40s was just weird. Roy Hall ran the same time as Ginn, and Zwick ran as fast as Troy Smith.

I don’t think those number are that surprising. Troy was never a burner. And Teddy’s strength was in his stride length. He could maintain speed longer than the other players out there. He wans’t getting faster, the other players were slowing down. If Teddy and Roy were asked to run 100 yards then there would have been a clear difference.

by gahnki on Mar 13, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

True, Ginn always was faster in his 2nd and 3rd gears than right off the bat vs other players. He also had that foot sprain.

Troy was just so much better of an athlete on the football field than Zwick that those numbers surprised me—I don’t think I had seen either run 40yds in a straight line, but I just assumed Tory would be way faster. I also thought Troy was a 4.5 guy and he ran a lot slower, even on OSU’s fast track. I blame the banquet circuit.

by rufio on Mar 13, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maualuga

Maualuga will make the highlite film a few times, but he’ll also make the police blotter a few times. People must like a MLB that can’t cover a pass and plays out of position while running around trying to make the highlite film. I thought the Browns were trying to get rid of all the wackos on this team.

by paulbip on Mar 12, 2009 7:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

dude, but you have no basis whatsoever to assume that maualuga will run afoul of the police, or that he is a “wacko”. he was arrested for an altercation as a freshman, and has had zero incidents since…in fact, by all accounts, he’s matured into a pretty solid, reflective guy.

i agree that he is overrated, though, and hope the browns pass on him.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 12, 2009 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tell me then, what does he “reflect” on?

by paulbip on Mar 12, 2009 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i don’t even know what this is supposed to mean. do you understand the word “reflective”?

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 13, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes I underestand “reflective”. Reflective is to contemplate. So I ask again, “What does he go around contemplating about?” What makes Maualuga such a “deep” person in your eyes?

by paulbip on Mar 14, 2009 4:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In the Sporting News magazine that arrived in my mailbox today, it was stated that ManKok have been on the phones offereing both DA and Quinn in trades and would look into drafting Stafford at #5 if Detroit and the rest pass on him.

Not set in stone obviously, but this is the first I’ve heard that ManKok are not happy with Quinn and the first interest I’ve heard in Stafford.

by talonk on Mar 13, 2009 2:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I had heard about that. I really have a hard time taking the Sporting News seriously though. This scenario just seems outrageous

by Roger Dorn on Mar 13, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I really don’t see that happening. QB’s are a big risk being picked that high, anyways, and I don’t see anything great about Stafford that would make me want to start over with him. This team needs to build around Quinn and take our chances with him.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 13, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would love to trade down if both Sanchez and Stafford were still there.

by rufio on Mar 13, 2009 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That sounds like something that would be leaked deliberately.

by gahnki on Mar 13, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If it was leaked so we could drum up interest in someone trading up for Stafford at 5, I am all for it.

by talonk on Mar 13, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m becoming more fascinated with the Mankok plan as time goes on.
Clearly they have a plan. They’ve also dug a huge hole, and I’m increasingly skeptical that they’ll be able to plug all the starting lineup holes through the draft and free agency, even with the salary cap space they’ve cleared. It would be quite an achievement. I have an irrational and nagging feeling they’re going to do something dramatic like blow our first pick and a bunch of cash to get Peppers.
Agreed on Anderson. At the least, they’re plugging him to get trade value. I’d like to see a first round (which might require trading additional players or future draft picks), or second for him.
Given the draft depth at OLB, I’m also wondering if they’ll go for Raji or Hood to give our OLBs a little more space to work with, and collapse that pocket some more.

by NM Dawg on Mar 13, 2009 1:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Evander Hood. I wouldn’t want him at #5, but if we acquired another 1st round pick, or possibly even a high 2nd, he might be a good pick up.

by NM Dawg on Mar 13, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

OSU’s players ran similar times as the combine numbers except for Beanie Wells. He ran a 4.39 twice. Just made himself a lot of money today. And they ran at the track they usually run on. If I were a GM, I would average out the combine time (slow track) and the pro day time (fast track). I think that would deliver a decent measure of speed.

by gahnki on Mar 13, 2009 2:57 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No improvement by Jenkins?

by rufio on Mar 13, 2009 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Slight improvement. 4.48 was the time I heard. Possibly a 4.46 with fast hands.

by gahnki on Mar 13, 2009 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beanie at 4.39 really made himself some money.

How fast do you think Heyward Bey runs at his pro day? If that track was slow and he ran a 4.30…

by rufio on Mar 13, 2009 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Bey cracks a 4.2, the Raiders will take him at 7.

The man loves him some speed…

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 13, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Has anyone seen a revised draft board since the Friday pro days? Do you think Beanie is much higher than 15? I wish the Browns could get him now that Womack has been signed.

Baseball fans are junkies, and their heroin is the statistic. - Robert S. Wieder

by jerseywahoo on Mar 14, 2009 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

#5

This is BE’s last year. For some odd reason(sarcasm) players seem to play their best in a contract year. That being said I think that the Brown’s are going to end up slapping the franchise tag on him at the end of the season and ship him out via trade if he plays to his potential. Then if a team wants him they would have to give up a high pick for him or we would end up eating a large salary for the year if we do not re-sign him before then.
   That being said it would make Crabtree at #5 that more interesting, I for one am not too concerned with his foot. If he plays with a sore foot all year and has less drops than BE did then I would be mre than pleased. Other than that we need defense more than anything else.

by JDfromCLE on Mar 15, 2009 1:18 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

There is no proof that players play better in their contract year. That is something which fans and media people talk about, and they bring up whenever it happens, but of course they never show when it doesn’t happen, when players play poorly in contract years. Most players play hard all the time, no matter it they’re in a contract year or not. Not all, but certainly the majority do. So the idea that they try “extra hard” when they’re playing for a new contract doesn’t fit, because these players are supercompetative people who want to win every game they play in.

Braylon had a bad year last year — he got injured in preseason and I don’t think he was fuly ready when he came back. Then he started having a few drops and it got in his head, and he was mentally messed up the rest of the year. I think an offseason of rest and relaxation will do him wonders, and he’ll bounce back to have a great year again this year. But it won’t have anything to do with being in a contract year.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 15, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that even if players play better in their contract years, that phenomenon is usually more applicable to linemen than skill position players, especially WRs.

by rufio on Mar 15, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I haven’t seen anything about contract year performance improvements, but, I’ve said this a million times, just because we don’t have evidence for something yet doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Your conclusive NO is as ridiculous as a conclusive YES.

by joeee on Mar 15, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What do you mean about a conclusive “NO”? I said there is no evidence that players play better in contract years, despite all the times that people talk about it. So what are we supposed to think — we can’t assume it exists, but we can’t assume it doesn’t exist? Huh?? It’s got to be one or the other.

I did say there are probably some players who don’t give their full effort in every game unless it’s a contract year, but to assume that the majority of players do that is unfair. What’s wrong with saying that? Why is that “ridiculous”?

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 15, 2009 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think an offseason of rest and relaxation will do him wonders, and he’ll bounce back to have a great year again this year. But it won’t have anything to do with being in a contract year.

It certainly could have something to do with it being a contract year. But until we have some evidence, we’ll never know.

by joeee on Mar 15, 2009 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think Brad was trying to give a conclusive anything, but I agree that this trend would be only a trend and somewhat inconclusive at best

by rufio on Mar 15, 2009 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

True, there is no conclusive evidence that players DO play better in a contract year. That being said, as much as I hate to quote myself, but, I said (and I quote) “players seem” which is more based off of my perception and I am sure a few others’ who perceive that “players seem” to play better in a contract year.
   I do have to agree with your point that he was injured in the preseason and that could have hurt his prep for the past season. I do like him as a player and was happy when we drafted him. I hope that he has another big year, he did help me win my fantasy football league 2yrs ago after all lol.

by JDfromCLE on Mar 16, 2009 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are exactly right, from a fan’s view players “seem” to play better in contract years. That’s because fans have selective memories (and I mean all fans, including myself, so I’m not just picking on you). We think that’s true, so we remember when players play well in contract year and point it out. When it doesn’t happen, nobody notices. There are many instinces where this is true (and not just in sports) — people notice events that fit their preconcieved ideas and ignore events that go against them. It’s human nature.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 16, 2009 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree

Do you feel that the way crennel ran his non contact two a days affected the way the team preformed all season?

by zhallscape18 on Mar 16, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

zhallscape18

I was wondering exactly how he did run those two-a-days? Aside from the non contact that is. Being an out of NEO Browns fan its hard to get back home to see training camp, so the only goings on I find are on web sights. Maybe you could give me some more insight into what was going on.

by JDfromCLE on Mar 16, 2009 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or you could look at it as Braylon has only had 1 good year. He led the leagues in drops in 2007 as well. I think he is useful if you have a solid #2 guy and a good receiving TE, but otherwise, I’m not so sure.

by Cols714 on Mar 16, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Once again, who care about drops if he’s catching a lot of passes and TD’s?? That’s like complaining that Grady Sizemore strikes out a lot — who cares, he’s getting on base and hitting for power. He’s going to have some K’s, but oh well.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 16, 2009 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, however you seem to think that last year’s drops were some sort of aberration, when if you looks at BE’s career, 2007’s production seems like the aberration, not the drops that he had last year.

by Cols714 on Mar 16, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What? He’s only been in the league four years — you expect players to improve as they get more experience. Especially recievers, because they’re never great in their rookie year and it usually takes 2 or 3 years to reach their potential. So it’s not unusual at all for Braylon to get progressively better his first three years; it was the dropoff the fourth year that’s unusual.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 16, 2009 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think the drops are the aberration, it was the lack of good plays that was the aberration. He might always drop a few that he should catch…he should still be able to be a 1000 yard receiver that really helps a team even with the drops, that is what I think was different last year.

by rufio on Mar 16, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly, look at T.O. he drops a lot of passes but gets 1000 yds every year. Ok maybe T.O. isn’t the best comparison. But the point is still this, BE had 80 recs in 2007 for 16 TDs and over 1200 yds rec. This year he had 55 rec for 800 yds and 3 TDs, that’s an average of 15 yds per reception. If he would have had the chance to catch more or at least had as many receptions as last year it would have put him over the 1000 yd mark .

by JDfromCLE on Mar 16, 2009 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

TO is a good comparison because he’s a fantastic reciever who drops a few passes every year. His off-field antics aside, he’s one of the best WR in the NFL. So if you’re catching 5 balls a game for over 1000 yards a season, who cares if you have a few drops?

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 16, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Couldn’t agree with you more on that. I will take a the drops for a 1000 yd season.

by JDfromCLE on Mar 16, 2009 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes
But BE is no TO. He has had 1 great year, and 3 other mediocre years. He is Nate Washington, another WR who makes big plays and drops passes. The only difference is in college and draft pedigree.

by Cols714 on Mar 17, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha….Edwards has over twice as many receptions and yards as Nate Washington in only one more season. But, other than that big difference, I’m sure they’re just the same.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 17, 2009 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ranked by Football Outsiders:

There is something to that, it’s called Nate Washington being the #3 WR and BE being the #1 WR. You know, opportunities and all that? Anyways, here are how they are ranked according to Football Outsiders

Nate Washington: ranked 49, catch rate of 51%,

DYAR Rk YAR Rk DVOA Rk VOA Passes Yards EYds TD Catch Rate

70 49 51 56 -0.8% 44 -4.0% 78 631 588 3 51%

Braylon Edwards: ranked 77, catch rate of 40%

-45 77 -86 78 -16.8% 73 -20.5% 138 873 821 4 40%

by Cols714 on Mar 17, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No one is arguing that BE had an off year.

If Washington had 55 grabs for 875 yards and 3 TD’s he would call it a career year.

When Edwards put up those numbers this year, we all asked what is wrong with him.

That is the difference, and if you don’t see that, then we as Browns fans can’t help you.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 17, 2009 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, Braylon is astronomically better than Washington.

Braylon also had a pretty serious knee injury in his first season any only played 10 games. I have heard it takes 9 months or so AFTER being cleared to run to get back to full strength from an ACL tear (9 or so months rehab + 9 or so months more). If that is true (and I am no doctor), then we really have only seen him for 2 seasons at full strength. The one of those seasons where he didn’t drop all of those balls he went for 1200+ and 17 TDs. The one where he dropped a bunch of balls he still went for almost 900 yds. His career YPC is 15.6 so throwing it to him is still worth the risk of him dropping it.

The man is not yet in his prime and could be a top-5 NFL wideout.

by rufio on Mar 17, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He led the league in drops the year he had 1200+ yards and 17 TDs. I think he is a valuable guy, just not the world beater or nearly as good as Buckeye Brad thinks he he is. He’s more of a deep threat, #2 or #3 WR than someone who you would count on to get the tough catches and yards.

by Cols714 on Mar 17, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The point Brad makes is a good one. He was second among all WRs in TDs that year. You can put up with leading the league in drops if he is scoring that much, plain and simple. TDs are a way way more important stat than dropped passes

by Roger Dorn on Mar 17, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yards per attempt might be a good statistical measure here, too: factor in the drops to his average yards per catch.

Drop rate would be yet another useful stat: someone who is targeted 15 times per game should be allowed more drops than someone targeted 2 or 3 times.

I don’t know where you would find something like that for WRs though.

by rufio on Mar 17, 2009 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Check football outsiders, they have catch percentage. BE was down at 40, meaning that only 40 of balls thrown his way were caught.

by Cols714 on Mar 17, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good lord you really want to cherry pick his catch rate? The man had four quarterbacks throw at him, one of which was Derek the Errant Laser Anderson (new nickname: DELA), one was Ken Forcibly Retired Dorsey, and another was Bruce Gradkowski.

He was 12% higher in 2007, 52%. That’s a low catch %, and yet he was one of if not the most productive WRs in the league AND had the most productive receiving year of ANY Brown EVER. How is that not extremely good?

Carmona for Cy Young 2009

by danvail on Mar 17, 2009 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea, I went to the Washington game. I am pretty sure Braylon was “targeted” maybe 8 times, but I don’t remember any of the passes coming within 5 yards of BE

by Roger Dorn on Mar 17, 2009 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do they have any of the stats I was asking about?

by rufio on Mar 17, 2009 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know how good you think I think he is. I never said he was a world beater, or the best reciever in the NFL, or anything like that. His “mediocre seasons”, as you call them, were his first two years in the NFL when he was learning how to play in the league, just like pretty much every other reciever that every played in the NFL. Then he had a breakout season last year, followed by a season in which he was injured and played with four different quartebacks, two of which never should play in the NFL again.

I expect that next year, with a steady QB, he’ll be close to his 2007 form again. He may never have that statistical season again, but he should be a top-10 WR in the NFL and could be top-5 (as rufio said) if he improves. As I said many times, drops don’t matter if you’re catching a bunch of TD’s. He’s not the most sure-handed reciever in the NFL but he can be one of the most explosive. He may always have some drops, but I think last year it got in his head because he had a bunch early and he was coming back from an injury.

The only point I’ve been trying to make is that I think with an offseason to relax and come back fresh with a set QB, he’ll be back to his ‘07 form (or close to it). He’ll never be Larry Fitzgerald or Randy Moss, but he can be Pro Bowl reciever again, and that’s pretty darn good.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 17, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

When he is catching the ball and healthy, he is a world-beater and right up there with Fitz, Calvin and Andre Johnson, T.O. and Moss. That is much, much better than a #2 or #3 receiver.

Even when he is dropping it less(i.e. 2007), he is better than the #1 wideouts on 25 teams in the NFL and all of the #2 wideouts except maybe 1 or 2 teams.

by rufio on Mar 17, 2009 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was sort of my point, I think. That he has not ever caught the ball as consistently as Fitz, Calvin, etc. Even in 2007, he didn’t rank up there with those guys.

by Cols714 on Mar 17, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just disagreed with you. He was that type of receiver in 07.

by rufio on Mar 17, 2009 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't trade away future picks

Phil Savage loved to trade away future picks to move up a few notches to select one of his favorite players. What has it got us? 4-12 season and no impact players in last year’s draft. Don’t trade away draft picks for any reason.

by rockybrown on Mar 16, 2009 5:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I would say trading a draft pick for Shaun Rogers turned out pretty good, wouldn’t you? So you shouldn’t be so absolute with your pronouncements.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 16, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

phil savaged our future

Lets face the fact that we are in a hole and not getting out anytime soon. Because, we put the savage-crennel dynamic duo at the steering wheel of our beloved browns. I do not blame any players for our misfurtune its this owner and his bad front office choices. mankok will bring us out of this funk. disapline the draft and depth are what will cure what ales us. As far as the draft goes if curry is gone trade down for more picks and please get derrick the stork out of cleveland! go browns f*** pittsburg our time is comeing

by zhallscape18 on Mar 16, 2009 11:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

chris…if you don’t, someone else is going to…and rudely…

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 16, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

For f’s sake, lurk for a while.

by joeee on Mar 16, 2009 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Julius Peppers

I just read that New England really does appear to be serious about obtaining Peppers. The article I read said Carolina only wants a second round pick. I imagine his salary may end up being outrageous. But, wouldn’t it be wise, if a team could afford it, to get a proven pro bowler for a second round pick rather than betting a first round pick on a rookie? Looks pretty tempting to me. I haven’t checked New England’s placement in the second round, but our picks are pretty high.

by NM Dawg on Mar 16, 2009 4:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

peppers doesn’t seem like a ManKok type of player, to me. i’d love to see him on the erie’s shores from a production perspective, but he seems to be a bit of a complainer, which will not fly in this new regime…and i’m pretty ok w/ that.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 16, 2009 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Being that I live in Charlotte NC right now(doesn’t make me an expert by any means) but its not that he us a complainer it is more that he is an attacking type of player and when they ( the Panthers) brought in a new D coordinator who isn’t Peppers didn’t like it too much. Also he felt that the reason they lost a few of their games last year was at the end the team decided to sit on their a**es and not continue to go after the QB.

by JDfromCLE on Mar 16, 2009 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let’s also not forget that Peppers quit on the Panthers two years ago.

He is a talent, but I think the Browns should focus on Cutler and the draft.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 17, 2009 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think ManKok is looking for young talent that they can build up their way vs. anything else. I think they would pass on a 29 year old for the chance to draft and develop some young talent, even if the 29 year old was a beast.

I might make the deal, essentially trading K2 for Peppers and a 5th rounder.

by rufio on Mar 16, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

NM Dawg

I am living is Charlotte NC right now. The Panthers slapped the franchise tag on him and so he is owed and has 16.7 million for one year. I am not sure how it all works so anyone feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but for Peppers and the Panthers have three options. 1) Peppers can sign the one year tender worth the 16.7 million 2) The Panthers can trade him and get what he’s worth in compensation whatever the league says he is worth 3) He sits at home makes no money and well God knows what else. But you best believe the Panthers have no intentions of trading him.

by JDfromCLE on Mar 16, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Offensive tackle.

Why does our first pick have to be defense. Our offense didnt score T.D’s in how many weeks. How about a stud right tackle if one slips to us at 5. Who is our right tackle now???? If we cant stop them then outscore them. With a revamped (right side) offensive line we might be able to keep a QB healthy all year and survive another year with Grandpa Jamal running the ball.

Chris Woodrow

by browndawg23 on Mar 16, 2009 7:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Both of our QBs didn’t get hurt because of poor RT play—Quinn’s injury seemed like a freak accident. There was plenty of poor RT play, don’t get me wrong. I just think we would have scored if we hadn’t lost both Quinn and Anderson. No NFL team expects to score a lot with their 3rd QB, and our season was more or less over at that point anyway.

Stud RTs don’t “slip” to #5 overall, they are probably rarely considered worth drafting in the top 15. LTs are the freaks of nature, 300lb ballerina/monsters who need to be picked that high. I don’t think committing that much of the salary cap (top 5 money to LT and RT) is worth it. I also think you can find stud RTs a lot later in the draft, where you usually can’t find freak LTs, NTs, and LBs.

by rufio on Mar 16, 2009 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

rufio, I just want to say that I’m not going to be fixing your mistakes all the time now so you’d better shape up!! Next time you’d better think before you post a comment because I’m gong to start charging you for every deletion.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 16, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rufio, I see that we got St Clair today hopefully solving the RT spot previously spoken about. Although I like Raji, I dont want another Gererd Warren or Courtney Brown with my first pick again which makes me worried about the NT hight draft choice. I feel like the only LB worth the #5 pick is Curry and alot of what I see projects him to be gone before us. LT is covered with Thomas, so where does that leave us. I’m all for trading down if anyone would give us extra picks to build on. I’m missing the must have player at #5, there are several ranked 10-20 that could help us without overspending.

Chris Woodrow

by browndawg23 on Mar 17, 2009 10:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Crabtree or trade down.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 17, 2009 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Raji and Courtney Brown are different positions, no comparison. All I can say about Raji is that he does an incredible job pushing back the o-line and getting upfield. I don’t think I saw Gerard Warren ever do that. As a BC fan, I saw Raji do this sort of thing 4-5 times a game

by Roger Dorn on Mar 17, 2009 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am convinced Curry would be a great player as a Brown. We should consider all trades down unless Curry is available. If nothing looks good in terms of deals, I wouldn’t mind Crabtree for sure, or maybe Raji or Orakpo.

Brown played DE, and Gerrard Warren was not the physical freak that Raji is. Raji is 6’1" 330lbs with speed for a DT. You can question his technique, work ethic, and college production, but the man has physical tools Warren could only dream about. Being short enough to be at a leverage advantage at 6’1" and yet really really stout at 330lbs…he could turn out to be an animal. Orakpo is probably only in the mix to me because of the lack of talent at OLB on the Browns’ roster. I question how much he has done to set himself apart from other guys at that position who would be available later. ManKok also seems to dislike injury-prone guys and Orakpo doesn’t seem like he is made of iron.

I think both of those defenders are boom-or-bust guys and it is impossible to tell before they actually suit up. If we pick someone at #5 and it isn’t those guys I will have to question the pick.

by rufio on Mar 18, 2009 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hi guys. I’m kinda new to this just to let you know. I was reading another post posted by manderson and I thought it was an ok idea. Trade DA and our #5 pick to Detroit for their #1 pick. This gives Detroit a QB and an early pick and gives us the #1 pick. It’ll never happen, but I liked manderson’s idea. What do you guys think?

by tjk_doc on Mar 18, 2009 8:47 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

it’s an interesting thought. if ManKok were convinced that one of the guys likely to go in the top 3 (read: aaron curry) is a lock to be a stud, then i’d say go for it. however, i believe we can still get a difference maker at 5, and turn DA into yet another pick in the top 60-70 selections. at this stage, we need to stockpile picks and get as many players as we can into the fold.

as well, 4 picks in the top 60-70 would give us an opportunity to wheel and deal and potentially add established players or increase our picks next year.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 18, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would be ok with it, especially if we could get a 6th or 7th round pick in the deal, too. Even a future 6th or 7th rounder.

I think that ManKok really wants to get more picks right now vs. better picks and that they would rather get yet another 2nd round pick.

I really like Curry, though.

by rufio on Mar 18, 2009 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, i’m high on curry, as well. another point worth mentioning is that moving DA for another 2nd round pick gets us a further bite at the apple in what is purported to be an extremely deep draft. there’s some question about the talent at the very top, but by all accounts there are NFL stars to be had at fairly high numbers. 3 picks in the second round (or an early 3rd to go w/ the 2 2nds) would be huge.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 18, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I feel pretty much the same way. I think DA would be worth more than a 3rd right now, so even if we only wanted picks in that range we could probably get 2 or even future picks.

If Detroit doesn’t take Stafford at #1 and gets a LT instead, hoping that the Kansas State QB will fall to them at #20 and then he doesnt, we should be calling them asking if they want DA.

by rufio on Mar 18, 2009 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats a really good point. And I just had a revelation that, with a few exceptons, we have’nt had the best results with # 1 picks. My head still hurts when I think about Tim Couch.

by tjk_doc on Mar 18, 2009 12:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

you mention you’re new here…one thing worth getting used to early on is the “reply” button at the bottom of each post. in order to respond directly to another post, and thereby continue a conversation/thought w/in a larger thread, reply is a necessity.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 18, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks alot. i’ll remember that from now on.

by tjk_doc on Mar 18, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think a lot of us are still feeling the headache from Couch. As well as Courtney Brown and Gerard Warren. Truthfully we haven’t had much lick with any picks in the high first except for J.Thomas and BE, who can still be a legit #1 receiver. Which for BE this year is definatly have to show and prove this year because he is going to be out only legit receiving threat.

by JDfromCLE on Mar 18, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see we finally agree on a few things, Curry or trade down both sound appealing. I just pray that whatever picks we end up with, we make the most of. We have to start hitting on some of these later round draft picks to get this team rebuilt.

Chris Woodrow

by browndawg23 on Mar 18, 2009 9:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

My first post

Heres how i look at the draft. We need to come out of the draft with these positions:
OLB, DE, S, RB, WR, and maybe even a backup QB(cause DA and BQs contracts both end this year and DA may be traded sooner than that.)

We should spend a 1st or second round pick For OLB. If curry is available, take him, but if not we could trade down and get cushing or matthews.

The DE that intrigues me the most is Tyson Jackson, for his size and ability to push the pocket. We could probably pick him with our first second rounder. More DEs to consider are Pannel Egboh from Stanford and Rulon Davis from Cal, both will be available later in the draft.

The best safety in the draft in my opinion is the big hitter patrick chung, but we might have to use a second rounder to get him.

I think we should look at a tough, physical RB to replace Lewis and to be a compliment to the speedy Jerome Harrison. At least one of these should be still available by our 4th rounder:
*The big Rashad Jennings of Liberty
*Glen Coffee, the physical runner from Alabama who loves to mow down defenders
*Javon Ringer, former Michigan State RB that bounces off would be tacklers and accelerates quickly
*James Davis from Clemson
Gartrell Johnson from Colorado State is also an option for a pick late in the draft.

Because of the release of JJ and stallworth being an idiot we are very thin at WR.
We could look at using our first pick to grab Crabtree, our use a second rounder to grab one of these guys:
*Brian Robiskie, from OSU, who is one of the most polished recievers in this draft and could probably be ready to start from day one

  • Ramses Barden from Cal Poly has the best frame of all the receivers (6-foot-6,
     227 pounds). He is a deap threat and is also good going over the middle.
    Other WRs that will be available late are Jarett Dillard of Rice and Patrick Turner of USC

For a backup QB we could either use our last pick our pick up an undrafted QB.
Two people id look at are Hunter cantwell of Louisville who will be drafted late and Drew Willy from Buffalo who probably wont be drafted.

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Mar 21, 2009 3:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i think we have to take crabtree at 5, mangini has been pretty much only signed defensive players in free agency with the exception of st clair, and all of the sudden WR is probably our biggest need. can we afford to have syndric steptoe be our number 2 wideout again?

by sww2109 on Mar 21, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea if we dont draft curry or trade down i would definetly prefer crabtree over brown, okrapo, or raji.

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Mar 21, 2009 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

1. Curry would probably play ILB in our scheme. He isn’t a pass rush specialist, and seems to do better at traditional linebacker duties (tackling, covering backs and TEs, zone coverage) than getting after the QB. Unless Alex Hall and Wimbley make significant improvements, we would still need a OLB who can get after the quarterback, even if we drafted Curry.

2. Egboh might be too lanky to play DE in our scheme. Romeo liked his DEs at 300+ lbs, and Egboh is 276. Rob Ryan might be able to find a place for him. Davis is a little shorter and heavier, but he graduated high school in 2001…that would make him about 26 years old?

3. Jackson is exactly the type of DE we should be looking for, at least in terms of frame and ability to stop the run. I do not believe he will be there in the 2nd. If he was, I would love to get him.

4. I bet Barden gets picked before the 4th round. I am not sure if I would mind spending our second 2nd round pick on him. The good thing is that there look to be a lot of solid WRs in this draft.

5. I don’t think Coffee will be able to “mow down” anyone in the NFL, but I do like him, and your list of backs. I do wonder if Ringer will be good in the NFL. The kid is straight up tough, but he isn’t big and his running style was based on getting a ton of carries and running with power. How will that translate to the NFL? Will he break down soon because of the ungodly amount of carries he’s had?

6. I think that saying “we need to come away with position X and position Y from this draft” is a bad strategy, especially when there are 5 or 6 Xs and Ys. You might be able to say “we need a pass rusher and a WR at some point in time” and do that, but in terms of trying to guess what specific guys will be there, especially in the 2nd+ rounds is impossible. The “experts” can’t do it, and the GMs probably can’t either. We should just take the best players available later in the draft, and if people who we think are really good players fall to us in the 2nd round, we should pick them even if they aren’t our greatest positions of need.

by rufio on Mar 22, 2009 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well im kinda concerned about curry too, especially after seeing how terrible gholston was for the jets last year and he was the first LB last year.

the problem with Davis is his age because he joined the military after high school.

Im curious about ringers NFL ability but i would definetly rather have him than lewis. Im not as concerned about his carries, i mean hes still young and if you look at the best running backs in the leauge and they’ve got a ton of carries in their career.

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Mar 22, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Curry is not the same type of LB as Gholston. He is already good at being a linebacker, unlike Gholston. He won the Butkus award. Other LBs taken high recently: Patrick Willis, Jerrod Mayo, AJ Hawk, Ernie Simms, Jon Beason. I would take any one of those guys right now and be absolutely elated we got them. Those are LBs who would all play the same ILB spot in our 3-4, not “hybrid” DE/OLB types like Gholston.

Davis is 26 not only because of his military service, but also because he got in a motorcycle accident and took a redshirt year. He appeared in 6 games in 2006 for Cal, and 6 in 2007 because of injuries in the two years following the accident. I don’t think I would draft him. I certainly don’t think ManKok will, as they seem intent on eliminating anyone who has ever been hurt from the Browns’ roster.

Lewis is questionably a hall of famer when he is done, and is 1 year removed from a 1300 yard season—before which everyone was saying he was already washed up and he was already too old. Clearly, he is not getting younger and is not the long-term answer, but I would not take an unproven 5’9" 205lb running back with questionable movement skills over Lewis.

by rufio on Mar 22, 2009 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Attention Dawg Pound

Hey 49er’s fan here and I want to have your opinion on who the Browns draft in 2008. http://49ersboard.blogspot.com/2009/03/49ers-board-nfl-mock-draft-2009.html There’s the link to my mock draft. I have the Browns surprising the scouts in the draft. Replacing a worn horse in Cleveland with hopes that it would bring back the 2007 offense. I am a 49er fan but I live in CT, why do you care(really you don’t but if there was a care you did care it would be) because that means I’ve seen plenty of Jets games. The beginning of the2008 year he made aggressive play calls but when they were close to clinching he went beyond conservitive. He has an unusual way of motivating his players, he makes the team watch film of sport greats like Ali.

 

Anyways to comment on the site you don’t need an account, and it’s more likely I’ll respond to your opinions there.

http://www.49ersboard.blogspot.com

http://www.49ersboard.blogspot.com

by supraman on Mar 22, 2009 12:19 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The Browns will probably made a RB selection at some pt on day 1, but I find it very improbable at pick 5

by Roger Dorn on Mar 22, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree. I could see them trading down about 10 spots and picking Beanie, but not at 5.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 22, 2009 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then we would risk him getting picked up by another team though. I just hope that if there is someone we want, we dont just pass on them because they dont have top 5 value

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Mar 22, 2009 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If he is picked, then I’m sure the Browns have someone else on their radar they’d want. I don’t think they’d trade down for the hope of only getting Beanie.

I think if Curry is gone at 5 and the Browns aren’t enamored with Crabtree then they’ll look to trade down. It depends on what they think of Orakpo, Brown, Maybin, Raji, etc. If they like one of those guys at 5 then they’ll take them, but if not I think they’ll look to trade down and get more picks. Of course, that’s much easier said than done. The hope is that some team really wants Crabtree and is willing to trade with the Browns, but I don’t know how likely that is.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 23, 2009 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What would you do?

On draft day its time for the 5th pick and no QB has been taken. The Jets, Bears, or Vikings call and offer their 1st and 2nd to trade up. Would you accept?

by rockybrown on Mar 23, 2009 1:12 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

how quickly can i say yes? this is the no-brainer of all time.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 23, 2009 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would already be calling the Jets, Bears, and Vikings so when we tried to reach each other, we would both get busy signals.

I would also call the 2 that didn’t trade up to ask them if they want DA.

by rufio on Mar 23, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ramses Barden update

Looks like he improved his 40 time and is climbing the boards again (although this could jsut be local paper rhetoric too). Would he be worth it to take over Robiskie in Round 2?

by talonk on Mar 23, 2009 2:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think I would still take Robo over Barden. While Barden is ridiculously big, Robiskie is much more polished and is just a more natural pass catcher. I think Robiskie gets in and out of his cuts a lot better than Barden and while their 40 times sound similar, I would rather have the guy with good starting and stopping skills, acceleration, etc. over the guy who has a higher top speed.

 Granted, I have only seen Barden on Youtube.

I do not think both players will still be on the board at the 50th overall pick and I would like to see us draft either.

by rufio on Mar 23, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’ll be Robiskie is still there. I don’t know anything about the other guy.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 23, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course you would BUCKEYE brad

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Mar 23, 2009 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I meant to say I’ll bet Robiskie is still there…..which would mean I don’t think he’ll get picked before then.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 23, 2009 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh i misunderstood you. I was just joking with you anyway.

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Mar 23, 2009 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

see this mini-discussion on him in a previous thread

by talonk on Mar 23, 2009 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Apparently I completely forgot about the Senior Bowl. His ability to get in and out of breaks still is questionable when looking at YouTube highlights, and whatever reports I read from the Senior Bowl seem to match that.

I think it boils down to if you would rather take the guy with a bigger upside who might not realize his potential, or the guy who is very polished but might not be able to improve a whole lot as a player.

I still think I would go Robo over Barden, mostly because of how our WRs look right now. Maybe Patten is the kind of guy who will be a veteran leader and can help a young WR to develop. I don’t know if I trust Braylon to do that right now. We still don’t have a WRs coach.

50th overall is the highest I think I would draft Barden, and I wouldn’t mind it if we spent that pick on him.

by rufio on Mar 23, 2009 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

for what it’s worth…this from peter king:

3. I think there’s no consensus on the first round in the draft, with the draft 33 days away. But the lobby guesswork after a long Sunday of pigeonholing NFL people and agents leaves this top five: Detroit, Georgia quarterback Stafford; St. Louis, Baylor tackle Jason Smith; Kansas City, Virginia tackle Eugene Monroe; Seattle, Texas defensive end Brian Orakpo; Cleveland, Wake Forest linebacker Aaron Curry.

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 23, 2009 3:50 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That’s cruel, getting my hopes up only to crush them like that.

by rufio on Mar 23, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

*hopes are not crushed yet, I am simply assuming they will be crushed based on the last 10-20 years of Cleveland sports history.

by rufio on Mar 23, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

shouldn’t that be 45 years?

by talonk on Mar 23, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Probably, but I haven’t been alive that long.

by rufio on Mar 23, 2009 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know this doesnt affect the Browns, because we have no reason to draft him but i heard that only one NFL scout showed up at N. Davis’s pro day

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Mar 23, 2009 5:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Browns picks in the first 2 rounds...
  1. - Malcolm Jenkins (FS) OSU
  2. - Larry English (OLB/DE) Northern Illinois
  3. - Clint Sintim (ILB) Virginia
    My reasoning is a #5 pick MUST start from day one. Obviously, Curry is the first choice at #5, but he will be gone before then. We currently don’t have a FS and Jenkins is a legite #5 pick. English would also start opposite Wimbley. Sintim played ILB at Virginia in the 3-4 and would eventually take over for Eric Barton.

by bestSSomar on Mar 24, 2009 6:55 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Brodney Pool is our starting FS and has been for several years now.

by rufio on Mar 24, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hes gonna be SS this year i heard

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Mar 24, 2009 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Browns picks in first 2 rounds WITH trades of DA and Edwards...

First off, the trades…Detroit trades their second round pick (#33) for DA
Giants trade second round pick (#45) and fifth round, plus Dominique Hixon for Edwards

  1. - Malcom Jenkins (FS) OSU
  2. - Larry English (OLB/DE) Northern Illinois (DA)
  3. - Shonn Greene (RB) Iowa
  4. - Clint Sintim (ILB) Virginia (Edwards)
  5. - Brian Robiskie (WR) OSU (Winslow)
    I coached Roby for 4 years in high school at Chagrin Falls and he is exactly the type of player that Mango/Koko want; hard working, all about the team and the kid can play!

by bestSSomar on Mar 24, 2009 7:43 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Didn’t we already shoot down a deal of Edwards for the Giants’ 2nd, 5th, and our choice of Hixon or some other receiver?

by rufio on Mar 24, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Browns Picks

First off i dont believe the browns will select raji because they already have shaun smith and shaun rogers who are very similar players that play the same position to go along with corey williams (whos not a 3-4 guy but spent mad money on), robaire smith who was leading us in sacks b4 his injury, cj mosely, and david bowens who can also play DE/OLB. Plus the addition of corey ivy also basically eliminates a first round choice at CB. So in all honest truth our most glaring need has become WR (since stallworthless and jj) or Safety. Seeing as their is not a clear cut safety in the first 5 i believe the browns best choice if Curry is gone (more than likely) is Crabtree the dude is young and has all the skill assets to become an elite reciever in the NFL. If he had not had a stress fracture he would be gone b4 our pick.

so my order goes….

1. Crabtree
2a. Tyson Jackson/ Alphonso Smith/ Michal Johnson/ or Brown/Mccoy
2b. then we take Chung/ Moore perferrably Chung.

Plus hopefully we can trade DA and get another or numerous picks.Don’t trade edwards because him and Crabtree will be lethal and we can do something that arizona has proven can win games.

by cgerycz on Mar 24, 2009 11:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Rufio...Pool has been moved to SS.

If you look at the Browns depth chart, Brodney Pool has been moved to SS and as of right now, Mike Adams is our starting FS. That is why Malcolm Jenkins should be the pick at #5. The hybrid OLB/DE is too risky to take that high.

by bestSSomar on Mar 24, 2009 1:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Please learn to use the REPLY button, it makes it much easier to follow a conversation. Why do I have to say this to every new member of this site? Did you not read the Community Guidelines when you joined?

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 24, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry Brad...

My point is that Malcolm Jenkins is a legite top ten pick and we are in desperate need of a play making FS. What difference does it make if we took him at #5 or #8? None of the other top 10 players will be there that the Browns see as a #5 pick. Curry, Crabtree and both OT’s will be the first 4 picks. Moving from CB to FS is much easier than moving from DE to OLB!

by bestSSomar on Mar 24, 2009 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly, I don’t think Jenkins is in Polamalu/Reed/Sanders’ class at Safety. He has experience there and the transition would be easy, but he is not going to make that kind of impact in the NFL at safety. Plus, we could upgrade over Adams with any draft pick we have, especially if we are willing to convert a CB to safety. You are going to have a hard time convincing me that Jenkins is a legit top 10 pick at safety if you keep misspelling “legit”. Players make transitions from DE to LB and CB to S all the time in the NFL. What overwhelming evidence do you have that one is harder than the other?

We are in far more desperate need of a pass rush than any position in the defensive backfield. That isn’t to say we can’t manufacture more pressure with better blitzes or by reviving Wimbley’s career or developing Alex Hall. Still, a pass rush is worth more than coverage. The Giants won the Super Bowl with a bad secondary but a really good front 7. The Steelers won with one great SS and no one else worth mentioning in their defensive backfield. The Steelers’ front 7 were also great. Denver has had 3 above average-to-great DBs in recent years and yet their D has been horrible because their front 7 was horrible. There are examples of this everywhere. If you gave me the choice of Demarcus Ware and an average safety or Polamalu and an average rush LB, I would take Ware in an instant.

If you really want a DB, give me Sean Smith out of Utah in round 2 or later. Chung is another safety to consider, but no one in this draft class really excites me.

I don’t know why Mangini would move Pool to SS, because Adams is way too slow to play FS. Adams should be the SS, Pool the FS. If it is the other way around, that doesn’t make any sense to me.

by rufio on Mar 24, 2009 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know this sounds like a real dumb question, but what is the difference between Free Safety and Strong Safety and which position is more important

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Mar 24, 2009 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

At its simplest, strong safety is more of a tackler/helper against the run, while free safety roams and excels in coverage.

I’ll let Rufio go into a more detailed explanation though, since I am assuming he can do a better job of explaining some of the less apparent differences

by Roger Dorn on Mar 24, 2009 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea I wouldnt be surprised if i found out rufio was a computer cuz he knows everything

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Mar 24, 2009 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I certainly do not know everything. I may be a computer.

A strong safety plays on the “strong”(offense’s right) side of the formation, and the free safety on the “weak” (offense’s left) side.

Traditionally, the right side of an offensive line is built to run block, while the left side (especially the LT) is built to pass protect because the offense’s left is the “blind side” for a right-handed QB.

Because of this the SS, who plays on the right side is usually better at supporting the run (because runs traditionally go to his side of the field). The SS would also typically be the guy who moves up “in to the box”, near where the linebackers are if you wanted to put 8 men in the box.

Polamalu does this all the time, you can see him dancing around near the LOS, acting like he is blitzing, moving to different zones, etc. You also see guys like him and Bob Sanders make a lot of plays near the LOS, going forward. To play up there and be able to turn and change directions and be able to stay with shifty RBs, so you usually want a guy who is agile or “fluid”. You also probably want a guy who is stouter than a FS or CB so that they can lay the smack down.

Also traditionally, a TE is lined up on the offense’s right side of the formation. This helps the right side of the OL even more in run blocking, and when the TE goes out to catch the ball, a SS might be assigned to cover him. Someone who could hang man-to-man with the Kellen Winslows and Antonio Gateses would be ideal.

A FS is typically more of a deep centerfielder, a guy who has good range to be able to help out CBs. He typically doesn’t need to be as agile or as good of a hitter as a SS and can be more “straight lined” as long as he can cover deep and close on the ball. Of course, the more versatile any of your players on defense is, the more you can confuse an offense and implement “exotic” schemes.

Of course, a safety’s responsibilities vary widely from scheme to scheme and from play to play. In a “normal” cover-1 or cover-3 defense, the FS would be in deep centerfield, and the SS would be either in man coverage on a TE or RB or a 3rd or 4th WR, or in a shorter zone waiting to hit/cover someone coming “over the middle.” In a cover-2 defense, both safeties are usually deep, covering a half of the field each.

I might be too quick to jump on Mangini for putting Pool at SS and Adams at FS. There are lots of different schemes with lots of different terminology that corresponds to who does what on a football field. Mangini could be using his own terms to describe exactly what I would expect Adams and Pool to be doing on the field. I just don’t think Adams has the deep-ball skills or the speed to play at what I am describing as FS. Pool would probably be OK at either position but he is coming off one of the best years of his career at FS.

by rufio on Mar 25, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

College DE to pro OLB...

Here’s the reason it is tougher to tansfer from a college 4-3 DE to a pro 3-4 OLB than a college corner to a pro safety. In the secondary, it is mostly about coverages. All college DB’s are taught all of them. Their size, speed and technique determines where they will play. College DE, rarely are taught to drop in coverage. They usually are just responsible for run containment and rushing the QB. In the pro 3-4 scheme, they have to add zone coverage and man coverage to their run and rush responsibilities. It takes a special type of athlete to do this. It can and has been done, but it is a gamle unless you have already done it at the college. This is why I would not take that gamble at #5.

I agree with you that a good pass rush is our most glairing need. In the pro 3-4, this can be done in many ways, by using different schemes with different positions. If you haven’t done it in college, it will take time to learn it in the pros. The difference with the DB’s is that they all have played similar coverages in college as they will in the pros. The key is their skill set and knowledge of coverages. Jenkins has all of what it takes to do this.

I like Sean Smith, too. I just have seen more of Jenkins than Smith.

As far as Crabtree is concerned…he played 2 years in the "spread offense and that’s it. It will be very different for him in a pro style offense; especially the Browns. Not saying he can’t do it, but it will take time.

by bestSSomar on Mar 28, 2009 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Malcolm Jenkins

Would be a waste of a pick at 5 because if we drafted him wed have to move him to safety and he’d have to learn it. Seeing as how we have mike adams and brodney pool who are both capable it does not make sense to pass up the best wr in the draft. Especially when Edwards may be traded, jj gone, stallworthless about to be in jail for years, and david patten as our two. While we can also take one of the best safteys with one of our picks in the second round between Moore or Chung. I really do not want to see syndric steptoe ever again. I really hope the browns select Crabtree.

by cgerycz on Mar 24, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Crabtree will be gone ...

and Mike Adams is strictly a back-up and special teams player.

by bestSSomar on Mar 24, 2009 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think it’s certain that Crabtree will be gone at all. Seattle doesn’t need him now that they’ve sign Houshmaznznzbh.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 24, 2009 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I def agree with you brad i want curry or crabtree at 5 or trade down. I believe det is taking stafford but the thing that scares me is since torry holt got released it seems more likely that they will take crabtree over an offensive lineman. KC really scares me because they could take curry crabtree or a ot. There is no way curry falls to us. I believe seattle will take a lineman now that they signed housh. I think if crabtree is taken b4 us we need to trade down because the only other options are orakpo and raji and we don’t really need raji and orakpo is a gamble. Although he reminds me of terrelle suggs. If we stay at 5 i go in this order

1. Curry
2. Crabtree
3. Orakpo or Trade Down

by cgerycz on Mar 24, 2009 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brown is better than okrapo and so is raji

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Mar 24, 2009 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Safety adderessed in Second Round

Saftey can be adderessed in the second round with our 2 picks with either william moore or patrick chung. Theres no need to reach on jenkins who is a corner and would perfer to play corner then switch to saftey and have to learn how to play it. Malcolm Jenkins is def a reach at 5 especially with his poor combine. I honestly would love to see the browns draft chung in the second round that dude can hit!

by cgerycz on Mar 24, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea i agree and plus safety isnt a postion worth a first round pick.

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Mar 24, 2009 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion that Crabtree will be gone. It wouldn’t surprise me, but its at least possible he is still around.

You don’t think any team out there reaches for a QB or trades up to get a QB? No one is taking Raji?

by rufio on Mar 24, 2009 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No QB in the top 10...

I still don’t think either of the 2 QB’s will be taken in the top 10. The first possible chance would be SF at #10, but they need so much more and have 2 QB’s on their roster. My top 10:
1-Curry
2-Smith
3-Crabtree
4-Munroe
5-Jenkins(trade down)
6- Ragi
7-Macklin
8-Bey
9-Orakpo
10- Maualuga

by bestSSomar on Mar 25, 2009 8:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Huh — are you saying that Jenkins is picked fifth by someone trading with the Browns or that the Browns trade down to pick Jenkins. If it’s the latter, then why do you have him in the 5th spot? And who are the Browns trading with?

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 25, 2009 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trading down..

is the other possibility, because we need too many players to just stay at #5. If we did, I think the Browns will look real hard at Jenkins. JMHO

by bestSSomar on Mar 25, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, Jenkins played safety at OSU in their nickel package for two years.

by rufio on Mar 24, 2009 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Alright rufio a majority of osu fans know that jenkins played safety in the osu nickel packege. But that doesn mean that he will be a good everydown safety plus he will have to learn more than the nickel package. There is no way the browns take him at 5, maybe if they trade down, but i do not believe the team that draft him will switch him from cb to safety especially being viewed as the top cb in the draft. Vontae Davis will be a bust just like his brother and jenkins will be a cb in the nfl. Unless you are just a stud safety like sean taylor or laron landry coming out you will normally not be a top ten pick.

by cgerycz on Mar 24, 2009 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree. Very few safeties get picked top ten, and the ones that are don’t play it just in a nickel package.

by tjk_doc on Mar 25, 2009 8:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t disagree that we shouldn’t take Jenkins or that he can play CB in the NFL, or that safeties are rarely worth a top-10 pick.

You said this: “(Jenkins) Would be a waste of a pick at 5 because if we drafted him wed have to move him to safety and he’d have to learn it.”

I just disagree that his transition to safety would potentially be a reason not to take him for any team. It isn’t as if he would have to learn a whole new position, and there would be less to learn for him to learn than a guy who had never played safety before in his life.

I don’t think the question is if he can make the transition to FS, its if he is worth it to take for us to play either position.

by rufio on Mar 25, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

which he is not worth it for us to take him at 5

because we have mcdonald wright and ivy at cb and we can draft a safety in the second round while taking a real possition of need at wr or lb in crabtree, orakpo, or possibly ( more than likely not) curry. I am not as high on raji as other people because i believe we have bigger more glaring needs.

by cgerycz on Mar 25, 2009 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Forget Ivy..

he is strictly a back-up and special teams player, whom Koko brought over.

by bestSSomar on Mar 28, 2009 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i think the browns should take either orakpo or raji. Raji has great upside because he can play end next to rogers in the 3-4. That is going to get extreme pressure on the right side and open up lanes for our lbs. Dont forget that we still have beau bell from last years draft that everyone was so high on. He played with a mean streak in college i cant wait to see him on the field for a whole season. Raji would instantly make the pass rush better because of the pressure he provides. Orakpo is a freak athlete and the only thing i see that he needs to work on is his lower body strength. He is fast and can get around the edge. Trading down for detroits 20th and their 1st second rounder makes sence to. they need a ton of help like we do and i think would be down for getting stafford and a lb in the top 5.

by brob05 on Mar 25, 2009 2:42 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree on Raji...

I watched film on NFL Live on him and really liked what I saw and heard. The idea of Raji, Rogers and Williams immediately helps vs. the run. Between those 3 guys, that’s 1000 lbs! You really can’t count on Robaire Smith, because of the achillies surgery and Shaun Smith is too slow. Raji can play the Nose at times and move Rogers to DE, which Mangini wants. That may have been a hint as whom the Browns are going to take at #5. Then with our (2) second round picks, we could choose the DE/OLB that fits Mangini’s sytem the best and add that Safety.
I was all for Malcolm Jenkins at #5, but after thinking about it, B.J. Raji makes more sense.

by bestSSomar on Mar 30, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

2nd round picks

I think that in the second round we need to get a RB and a CB. My vote is for Alphonso Smith from Wake and Donald Brown from UConn. Smith is a good cover corner with good speed that will help sure up our secondary. Donald Brown runs hard and is used to carrying the load. He averaged something like 28 carries a game in college and had a tremendous bowl game.

by brob05 on Mar 30, 2009 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Donald Brown..

might go before we have a chance at him! We do need that rush DE/OLB, though.

by bestSSomar on Mar 30, 2009 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

New subject, Rufio...

What is the Browns’ identity on defense and offense?

by bestSSomar on Mar 28, 2009 12:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think this our biggest problem...

We don’t have one! When you think of other teams in the league, most of the good teams have an “identity”. The Browns don’t have one.
I think Mango/Koko want the Browns to be known as a “strong defensive, ball control, hard hitting” team, so I think we should assemble players that reflect that.
A good start would be to draft Brian Orakpo, Tyson Jackson and Alex Mack with our 3 picks on day one of the NFL Draft and sign Roy Williams as our SS from free agency.
If we can get a day one pick for DA, I would like to see the Browns draft (ILB) Clint Sintim with that pick.

by bestSSomar on Apr 4, 2009 8:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We still need a WR and it is very unlikely we can get both Mack and Jackson

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Apr 4, 2009 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And right now our identity is bad defense

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Apr 4, 2009 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

Start posting about the Browns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.