Dawgs By Nature: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Anonymous Eagle covering Marquette!

Highlights of WR Brian Robiskie, No. 36 Overall Pick for the Cleveland Browns

2983663539_616ae7f492_medium

This is the highest the Browns have selected a receiver since Braylon Edwards a few years ago. At No. 36 overall, Brian Robiskie was drafted to make a difference to what turned out to be the most criticized position all of last season.

While linebacker was pretty close to being our worst position, because the expectations were very high at receiver last year, the effort from that unit during the 2008 campaign was pitiful.

Edwards, a year after he looked like one of the best playmaking receivers in the league, turned into one of the worst clutch receivers in recent memory. He was our No. 1 guy, but he didn't perform like it. Our No. 2 receiver, Donte Stallworth, isn't even worth our time to discuss. After an impressive preseason, Syndric Steptoe looked like a practice squad player forced into a starting role every week. In fairness though, it's not really his fault that he was put in that position.

Rumors were circulating like crazy before the draft that Edwards would be dealt to every other team in the league, but as of today, he's still with us and slated to be our No. 1 receiver for at least one more season. He has the ability to be a playmaker still, but especially with TE Kellen Winslow gone, we were in need of a polished possession receiver. That's where Robiskie, the son of former Browns coach Terry Robiskie, comes in.

PRESS CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHTS

Here are some highlights of Brian Robiskie's conference call after joining the Browns:

(On how he compliments Browns wide receiver Braylon Edwards) - “First and foremost, I think Braylon is a tremendous receiver. I’m just, obviously, ecstatic about the fact that I can just come up there and help them with anything they need me to do, play inside or play outside. Whatever they need me to do I’m just excited about the fact that I can come up there and help that offense go to the next level.”

(On going from ball boy to Cleveland Brown) - “It’s unbelievable. I think, you know just the connection that I have with that team and spending the time that I did up there with my dad (former Browns coach Terry Robiskie). To come back and be a part of that team, that franchise is unbelievable and I feel so blessed to have that opportunity and to go and contribute anyway I can. I’m excited about it.”

NOTE: This one is from TERRY ROBISKIE, Brian's father:

(On how he separates himself from being a parent and coach) - “I’m just extremely, extremely proud. I’m happy and I’m thrilled that he is going to an organization that I am very familiar with. I’m happy that he is going to a city that I am very familiar with. He’s going back to, what I’ve told people is, he’s going back to the number one city for which I’ve coached in that I fell in love with. I’ve coached in some tremendous cities, but I fell in love with Cleveland. Cleveland, Ohio, the fans are unbelievable. The opportunity I had there, to be the interim head coach was phenomenal.

I think the coaching staff that they have there now is terrific. I believed in the staff that I left there. I thought it was tremendous. I think all the coaches that they have there today, those guys are fabulous. How I separate myself, I’m just a father. Today, I’m a father. He can go up there to Cleveland and go to work. Those connections and getting things and completing that deep ball, that’s between him and the quarterbacks. Those guys got to get it done. I’m just a father. From this day forward, he’s on his own now, I’ve got to let him go. In a year or two we’re going to play Cleveland and I’m going to have to beat him so, I’m not going to worry about coaching him anymore. ”

See Brian Robiskie's Full Conference Call Transcript Here

SCOUTING REPORT HIGHLIGHTS

Brian Robiskie - Wide Receiver, Ohio State
6'3", 209 lbs, Age: 21

Strengths: Of all the receivers in the draft, Robiskie might be able to make the easiest transition to the NFL in year number one. There haven't been any questions as to whether or not he can hold on to the football, and he's grown up always having the mentality of a wide receiver. He has some experience returning punts.

Weaknesses: He lacks the ideal speed for a receiver, which may pose issues when he's trying to create separation from some of the NFL's experienced cornerbacks.

2005: (Special Teamer)

2006: 29 catches for 383 yards and 5 touchdowns. (5 starts)

2007: 55 catches for 939 yards and 11 touchdowns. (13 starts)

2008: 42 catches for 535 yards and 8 touchdowns. (12 starts)

VIDEO HIGHLIGHTS

CONCLUSION

The Browns passed up on the opportunity to take a "high potential, high risk" defensive player in Rey Maualuga in order to acquire a player who can...catch the ball for us.

I don't think we should expect Robiskie to be a 1,000 yard receiver, or a player who is going to take over a game this season. The expectations of that role should still belong to Braylon Edwards. Edwards didn't have an adequate counterpart prior to the draft though, and now he does. It'll up to offensive coordinator Brian Daboll to utilize Robiskie appropriately.

Looking back at when we took Robiskie, whether you think he was a reach at No. 36 depends on what you define as success in the NFL. If you define success as being a future Pro Bowler, then we probably reached. If you define success as a player who improves upon what you already had and does their job well, then we didn't reach.

For me, I don't think we reached. Right now, my expectations are for Robiskie to start opposite Edwards. I still might have preferred another position considering who was left on the board, but you can't just say "we could've gotten someone in round four". There are success stories in the later rounds, but not as often as the early rounds.

GRADE OF THE PICK ITSELF: B+

GRADE OF THE PICK AT NO. 36: B-

Poll
Did you approve of the selection of WR Brian Robiskie at No. 36 overall?
Yes
565 votes
No
106 votes

671 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 70 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The first thing I thought when we drafted Brian Robiskie is that he sounded like another Kevin Johnson — a thought that brings warmth to my heart. I don’t see it as much of a reach.

Tribe fan trapped in Kansas

by Avindian on Apr 30, 2009 1:12 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That highlight missed at least a few memorable Robiskie catches. The fade-stop against former Penn St. and current St Louis Rams DB Justin King comes to mind.

Lots of plyos, Brian. Lots of plyos.

by rufio on Apr 30, 2009 3:19 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I tried to find something that had a good number of plays, but there didn’t seem to be a lot of premade video packages for Robo. If someone finds a better package, let me know and I’ll swap the videos.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Apr 30, 2009 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not trying to criticize your choice, just saying that his body of work was larger than that.

I think you picked a great video, except for the Creed part ;)

by rufio on Apr 30, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I always hit the mute button unless it’s the actual announcers calling the plays :)

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Apr 30, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like them

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 1, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and that song is on my ipod.

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 1, 2009 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You like Disturbed too, huh?

You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on May 1, 2009 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I only like the begining of Down with the Sickness. other than that i dont like them.

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 1, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not even similar bands

other than they both suck

from the forest itself comes the handle for the axe

by troy145 on May 2, 2009 7:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Creed?

Anyways Im just as excited about Mohammed Massaquia(?) as I am about Robo. Maybe Im just an SEC homer though.

from the forest itself comes the handle for the axe

by troy145 on Apr 30, 2009 10:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think its great to see both these guys wearing Browns uniforms. I think either one of them could start at #2 or #3 this year.

by tjk_doc on Apr 30, 2009 1:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Cleveland picked him in a round where no other WR’s were taken besides the ones we took. We could have gotten a LB better than veikune with the first pick, gotten another defensive player with one of the other picks and still could have gotten robiske while picking up a WR with just as much potential and risk as Massaquoi in the later rounds. I think the second round was handled pretty recklessly

by Rocland on Apr 30, 2009 1:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Except that you are wrong. First, its a technicality, but Pat White was drafted as a WR in round 2 by Miami. More significantly, Reports had Robo going #49 if we didn’t take him, to Chicago, I believe. I’ve also read the Bills and Giants were high on him- each of those teams had a 2 picks in the 2nd round and one before our pick at #50. Both Robiskie and Massaquoi were pretty consensus 2nd round talent. I’ll listen to someone saying that we were a little early on both of them, but let’s not totally lose reality: Robo probably wouldn’t have been there at #50 and WR was a huge need. Also, if you don’t like Maualuga, and the Browns clearly didn’t, who else would have been such a clear upgrade over Veikune? Clint Stintum??? Really? Now who is reaching?

by Ryan Kelsey on Apr 30, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, you are wrong. First of all there were 6 WR’s taken in the first round. Everyone who had their eye on a WR took one by then. The only other teams that had their eye on Robo was Indy and as you can see they weren’t a threat. Second White was taken as a Wild Cat contribution. If he didn’t have that specific purpose, then he wouldn’t have been drafted by him. But regardless if they were consequently 2nd round talent or not(which masso wasn’t), a reach is someone they could have gotten later but didn’t. Both of those recievers would have been taken later. And if there weren’t on the board, oh well. there is a smaller difference in talent between the WR’s in the 2nd round than in the other rounds, and the difference in talent between the other players was a lot greater

by Rocland on May 1, 2009 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And if there weren’t on the board, oh well. there is a smaller difference in talent between the WR’s in the 2nd round than in the other rounds, and the difference in talent between the other players was a lot greater

But, like you point out, there wasn’t another WR taken in the 2nd round. There were 7 WRs taken in round 3. Robo and Massaquoi were rated higher than each of them.
Oh and here are some links to projections:
Robiskie- Scott Wright’s Draft Countdown (Round 2 or 3, #7 WR), Scout.com (#7 WR, #47 overall), Pro Football Weekly (#6 WR)
Massaquoi- Scott Wright’s Draft Countdown (Round 2 or 3, # 10 WR), Pro Football Weekly (#7 WR)

I have a problem also with the generic criticism of the top 2 WR available in round 2 when you don’t really have a better idea. Who are these “other players” that you wanted? Is it Maualuga? Or would you have been as likely to complain if they took any two other guys?

by Ryan Kelsey on May 1, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

By the way, thanks for these links, am going to add their rankings to my draft review post. More data points provides better analysis.

by talonk on May 2, 2009 1:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its pretty impossible to get inside a team’s head and know what they would have done at a specific pick had the situation been different, isn’t it? For all we know, the teams immediately after us could have been looking to draft both Robo and MoMass.

Maybe they aren’t the best possible 2nd round picks in the history of the draft, but its not like we are looking like the Raiders right now.

Lets wait to actually see them play before we decide they weren’t worth it.

by rufio on May 1, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

this theory has one (ok, at least one) fatal flaw: you’re assuming that the teams drafting between our pick of Robiskie and the #50 pick would not have taken him had he been available.

this is no different than saying if tampa bay had not taken josh freeman at #17, that he would have still been available at pick #100 (last of the 3rd round) because the next QB taken was at #101.

You know Selig? Ombudsman.

by rolub on Apr 30, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I think that because of our traditionally bad defense we tend to get a little amnesia about how amazingly bad our offense was last year. Our offense was inconsistent and ugly before DA and BQ went down. The calamity afterward lead us to the worst offense in football.

So what do ManKok do? Trade for a QB and spend the first three picks on offense. I was pretty pissed about drafting Robo at 36 – but in retrospect, I understand where they’re going. I think our offense next year will certainly be average, quite possibly above average to good.

by joeee on Apr 30, 2009 1:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

One of the problems I have is that they didn’t get any steals in the first two rounds when there were opportunities all around. Mack is going to be a great player, but I’m not sure if he’ll be better than unger who went a lot later. Mass is a big risk but is he going to be better than any of the other WR’s taken in the third in this weak WR class? Instead those picks could have been used for more impact players. One of the problems the Browns have always had is the team doesn’t have much personality and hype value. Now with winslow gone it’s looking more and more drab

by Rocland on Apr 30, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Most of what I’ve read says Unger (and any other C in the draft) couldn’t carry Mack’s jock, so I think it’s missing the point of the pick to call them fungible.

Massaquoi was ranked as a 2nd round talent in a position of drastic need, even after the Robiskie pick.

Personality and “hype value” get assigned after you start winning, not before.

www.lowbrowsophisticate.com

by kwoog on Apr 30, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love this word:

to call them fungible.

OK, so I’m a vocab nerd. I can live with that.

by drjeo on Apr 30, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not only that, but the Steelers really wanted Mack at #32 AND another center was picked in the first round besides Mack, and it wasn’t Unger- it was Eric Wood. The 3 top centers went in the order most thought they would, and I’d dare you to find any reputable ranking that has Mack behind Unger.

by Ryan Kelsey on Apr 30, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Steelers reporter Jim Wexell has stated that the Steelers really wanted Wood in the 1st and if he wasn’t there would be happy with trading up to get Unger in the 2nd. I

by Cols714 on Apr 30, 2009 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mack is going to be a great player, but I’m not sure if he’ll be better than unger who went a lot later.

Unger has never man blocked in his life. He was a pure zone blocker, and that will not cut it here. Ngata and Hampton make sure of that.

Resident Josh Freeman fan.

by gahnki on Apr 30, 2009 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mack is and always has been viewed (throughout the draft process) as far superior to Unger.

by rufio on Apr 30, 2009 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thats not true. Most analysis rated Mack higher but said that all together all 3 centers were of equal potential. Some made comments like Unger has the best foot movement amongst linemen in the draft

by Rocland on May 1, 2009 1:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If that’s true (that people had them rated equally), its ridiculous. Who said that, Grossi?

I’ve been down on Unger since I saw him and Mack play. BJ Raji dominated him at the senior bowl. He’s much weaker than Mack, and lankier and at a bigger leverage disadvantage to the stouter NTs we face. Mack is at worst a better fit in our division, and in my eyes was far and away the best C in this draft. I had Unger behind Eric Wood.

If it ends up the opposite, go ahead and call me out.

by rufio on May 1, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mayock

Mike Mayock from NFL.com had them listed this way:

Centers:
-————-
1. Max Unger
2. Eric Wood
3. Alex Mack
4. A.Q. Shipley
5. Antoine Caldwell

by Cols714 on May 1, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

sorry about the use of the subject line

by Cols714 on May 1, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah they HATE that here

must be something in the water…

from the forest itself comes the handle for the axe

by troy145 on May 2, 2009 7:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

UNGER IS A ZONE BLOCKER!!!!!

I’m sorry if some of you are ignoring this, but he is just not a good fit for the Browns. He ended up in Seattle, where he will be used correctly. Mack/Wood were better fits for the Browns, regardless of their “rankings.”

Resident Josh Freeman fan.

by gahnki on May 1, 2009 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Weak receiver class? Really?!?! Everything I heard and read was that this was the deepest WR class in the last 10 years. As far as impact goes, being able to pass the ball with 3 capable weapons (not counting TE and Harrison) will do wonders for our defense. I mean, how many 3 and outs did we have last year? LB is a crapshoot. With all the receivers we lost and we had the worst passing game in the NFL, this was a smart direction to go. Massaquoi was a beast in college. The size of our top 3 WR with an accurate QB like Quinn could be great!!! YAC!!!!

Baseball fans are junkies, and their heroin is the statistic. - Robert S. Wieder

by jerseywahoo on Apr 30, 2009 2:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I will concur here on one facet.

The number of awful offensive series we had last year (even before DQ and BQ went down) put a huge burden on the defense. Not to mention the defensive scheme was also pretty lame (bend, don’t break). Our defense may have been below average last year, but the multitude of failures by our offense put an average at best defense on the field for many more snaps than it needed to be.

If the offense had been able to sustain any short drives (i.e. two to 3 first downs and a punt), I am willing to bet our defense would have looked much better. How many series did Rogers have to sub out because he was winded for being on the field too often?

by talonk on Apr 30, 2009 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The defensive scheme really played into that. Bend but don’t break defenses are going to be on the field a lot longer; our defense wore itself out and kept the offense out of rhythm.

The defensive scheming can’t get too much worse than last year, and our passing game can’t either.

by rufio on Apr 30, 2009 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Our running game was pretty bad too. Im not sure jamal could run a 40 in a week

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 1, 2009 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe “multitude of offensive failures” covered that. Conventional wisdom says that anything our O can do (running the ball more successfully included) should help us win ballgames.

by rufio on May 1, 2009 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still don’t see how drafting the most nfl ready receiver at 36 is such a bad pick? Ok maybe we get Robiskie at 50 but where did we really suffer. The 2 LBs we drafted are good prospects and don’t forget that Beau Bell is still on the roster. I might be an enternal optomist, however I think every single players that contribute solidly. When you had as many holes that we had, this seems to be the most pragmatic approach to building a football team. Isn’t that the goal in rebuilding one of the worst teams in the NFL.

Baseball fans are junkies, and their heroin is the statistic. - Robert S. Wieder

by jerseywahoo on May 1, 2009 12:19 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely. Some seem to believe that adding a particular player here and there will remedy the Browns’ ailments. To me it looks more like their overall talent level needed serious upgrading, so I’m more interested in a systematic overhaul than a band-aid approach. To be sure, some of the players they added are short-term solutions, but that’s the best that can be done for now. I expect to see a considerably improved team next year, but I suspect that their high-water mark might be an 8-8 record, and even that is probably a stretch.

by drjeo on May 1, 2009 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

everette brown just would have been a steal and we could have traded up in the second round.

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 1, 2009 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How fast does Robo run a 40? and why did he only have 500 yds. last year?

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 1, 2009 6:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Because OSU stopped throwing the ball once Pryor took over as starting QB. Pryor only averaged about 12-15 passes a game when he was starting, so that doesn’t leave many passes for your recievers to catch. That’s why both Robiskie and Hartline saw their stats drop significantly from 2007 (and probably why Hartline left early).

by Buckeye Brad on May 1, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know, TP looked pretty good in the spring game. If I were Hartline, I would have been worried about Ray Small, Posey, et al overshadowing me.

by rufio on May 1, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

but yes, both WRs got way fewer looks after Pryor took over.

by rufio on May 1, 2009 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah, Pryor looked great in the spring game. I expect to see him throwing a lot more this year. But last year I don’t think Tressel was comfortable enough with his passing abilities to let him throw that much.

And I don’t think Hartline should have been worred about Ray Small. That guy has always been way too inconsistant to count on as a big-time reciever. Even at the spring game, he made some nice catches (including that nice move on the TD) but still dropped some easy balls. I think Hartline would have been a big part of the offense had he stayed.

by Buckeye Brad on May 2, 2009 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn’t comfortable with Pryor’s passing ability last year either.

Small seems like he is finally on the right path. Even without him, the young guys are so talented I would have been worried if I was Hartline. Not that he wouldn’t have played (everyone knows about Tressel’s love for upperclassmen) but there are just so many people who should be targets in the passing game, I don’t know how many looks Hartline would have gotten.

Posey
Small
Lamaar Thomas
Stonebrunner
Ballard
a healthy Brandon Saine
Taurian Washington
and with New recruits like Duron Carter, James Jackson, and maybe Corey Brown…that’s a lot of people who deserve a chance to catch the ball.

by rufio on May 2, 2009 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ill tell u a receiver to look out for this year in college football; Michael Floyd

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 2, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

went to ND’s spring game. Gotta say, Claussen looked god awful. Like terrible. Like yuk.

by Ryan Kelsey on May 3, 2009 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

he wasnt that bad and i think he will still have a great year.

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 3, 2009 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, that’s really surprising! An ND fan thinks he’s going to have a great year.

by Buckeye Brad on May 4, 2009 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You all were saying Pryor will have a good year and most of u all are OSU fans so stop trashing my team dawg

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 4, 2009 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah but we have at least some form of evidence that Pryor’s passing is improving…that evidence, combined with his freakish natural ability would lead us to believe that Pryor will have a good year. What leads you to believe that Clausen will have a good year? His bad spring game?

I don’t know much about ND other than they dominated UH in their bowl last year and everyone thinks this is the year that Weiss’ top-10 recruiting classes pay off and they get back to a certain level of national respectability. I am in no position to say what kind of year Clausen will have. Why do you think he breaks out, other than the fact that you like his team?

by rufio on May 4, 2009 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

First of all, if you watch Clausen you can tell he has the potential. In the first year you could see that but he was thrown into a bad situation( a team with a terrible O-line and no weapons). In his sophomore year he made giant improvements. I expect him to make even more improvements, and now he has the weapons to help him be succesful.

He also has all the tools. He has a real strong arm and is great at throwing the deep ball. He also has good accuracy.

He will be more consistent once he gets a little better at reading some types of defenses.

Stats: http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/players/150562

these are some highlights after the first month of his 08 season: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0-plpEHcUs

and ill just post his hawaii bowl stats: 22-26, 401 yds., 5 td, 0int

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 5, 2009 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That highlight shows the same 4 plays like 5 times each.

He definitely has an arm. I am pulling for ND to be good this year because I am pretty sure I will be forced to watch them on TV multiple times and I don’t want to watch sub-par football.

by rufio on May 10, 2009 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m tellin you, ND’s second string QB and montana’s kid looked way more impressive. Claussen looked like their 3rd best QB, in my eyes. He overthrew crossing routes, couldn’t hit a curl or an out to save his life. It looked like he was only comfortable throwing fades and streaks.

by Ryan Kelsey on May 4, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Claussen was terrible in every game I watched him in except for the bowl game

by Roger Dorn on May 4, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He was bad against USC,BC, and NC ill give you that, but he didnt have the best supporting cast (if u dont beleive me look how many ND guys were drafted; 1 David Bruton, safety, 4th round). He wasnt bad the other games, though

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 4, 2009 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha. I should be more fair, but those honest to God were the only 3 ND games I saw all season

by Roger Dorn on May 5, 2009 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i guess i can see why u though he was bad. watch some of those highlights i posted above if you want to see when he was playing good

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 5, 2009 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have different websites saying Robo’s combine 40 was 4.49 and 4.52 and his pro day 40 time was anywhere between 4.47 and 4.52.

What you should be more concerned with is his times in other drills. His short shuttle was 4.19, which isn’t beastly, but also not terrible. His 3 cone was 6.72, again not terrible but not great. I have Kevin Ogletree with the best short shuttle of the WRs at 4.08, and Andrew Means with the worst at 4.21. As for the 3 cone, Tiquan Underwood’s 6.62 is listed as the best of the WRs, and Johnny Knox’s 6.81 is the worst. Keep in mind that lots of guys didn’t run those drills at the combine, and probably not because they would have done really well.

by rufio on May 1, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Robiskie has a solid NFL career as he did at OSU, then this pick at #36 is absolutely justified.

As it is right now, I have to compliment Mangini and Kokinis for something that’s been missing from the Browns organization for several years . . . SENSIBILITY.

by ploni on May 3, 2009 10:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No clue what this means. Thomas, Steinbach, Edwards, Quinn, Anderson, Vickers, Rogers, Jackson, Wimbley, Pool, Wright and McDonald were all sensible acquisitions.

www.lowbrowsophisticate.com

by kwoog on May 3, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hall, Cribbs, Bentley, Jurevicious, Lewis, Harrison…

Imagine if Butch Davis hadn’t completely wrecked us. I think the roster looks a lot better than it did when Romeo and Phil first arrived.

by rufio on May 4, 2009 1:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know we beat this topic to death last year, but I agree- Improving talent and solid acquisitions were anything but our weakness in the Savage/Crennel era. Now, if you want to talk about communication between coaching staff and front office, or being professional, or organized, or coaching well, or executing well, or having a game plan, or public relations, well… Mangini and Kokinis have nowhere to take us, but up.

by Ryan Kelsey on May 4, 2009 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know Savage would trade up for people that Crennel refused to play

Eric Berry Bandwagon

by BradyQuinnisBeast on May 4, 2009 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lets see if Mangini can get us that “first year bump”. We have more talent than 4-12. How much more? How much can he get out of players that don’t seem to be playing up to their potential? Shaun Rogers? Does this defense get better if we can turn them loose a little bit? Can we get back to being creative on offense?

Start the season already.

by rufio on May 4, 2009 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

Start posting about the Browns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Troy_smith_small
About the Jake Delhomme acquisition.
4horsemen_small
Possible Mid round Sleepers.
Twitter-av_small
Why didn't we trade for McNabb or Kolb?
Rogerdorn_small
The Pittsburgh Steelers are Hypocrites?
4horsemen_small
Dear Mike Holmgren,
4horsemen_small
Want to know if Berry falls to #7? It depends on Mike Shanahan and the Redskins.
Byner_small
How Long Before Our Brownies Are in PlayOff Contention?
Biggamebob_small
Browns Organizational Love Has One Flaw
Small
4 Ways to Handle the Browns’ QB Situation
Awesomeness_small
Draft thread: Pre-Combine Predictions

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Referee Michael Batlan, left, grabs USC defensive end Everson Griffen before throwing a flag for unsportsmanlike conduct in the third quarter during an NCAA college football game against Notre Dame in South Bend, Ind., Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009. USC defeated Notre Dame 34-27. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy)

NFL Draft 2010 Player Profile: Everson Griffen, USC Defensive End

Photo

NFL Draft 2010 Player Profile: Darryl Washington, TCU Linebacker

Florida tight end Aaron Hernandez (81) catches a pass from quarterback Tim Tebow and is tackled Arkansas linebacker Wendel Davis during the first half of an NCAA college football game in Gainesville, Fla., Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009.(AP Photo/Phil Sandlin)

NFL Draft 2010 Player Profile: Aaron Hernandez, Florida Tight End

More from SBNation.com >


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Moderators

Pryor_small Buckeye Brad