FanPost

Just a consideration



I got to thinking about the roster implications, of entertaining different defensive systems.  In simple math, if you have the players for a 3-4 and a 4-3, you´re keeping a set of 7 special skillset players for one system and a set of 7 special skillset palyers for the other system.  This is detrimental to establishing quality depth at every position.  I would much rather, you commit to a 3-4, designate 7 starters suited to it, and get the 7 best backups you can find.  In simple think that would mean you have 14 players who are suited to what´s expected of them as compared to 14 with a divisive, confusing skillset.  The way things are, it tells me the powers that be have settled for subpar if not possibly abysmal in trying to find the right combination.  This is catastrophe in the making.

This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Dawgs By Nature

You must be a member of Dawgs By Nature to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Dawgs By Nature. You should read them.

Join Dawgs By Nature

You must be a member of Dawgs By Nature to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Dawgs By Nature. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker