Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Cleveland Browns 53-Man Roster Projection (Final Version) - Will Jamal Lewis Make It?

Only 53 men can make the make the Cleveland Browns final roster, and the final cuts are due by Saturday at 4 PM. Besides making their own cuts, the Browns' front office will be watching the waiver wire as well to see if there are any "surprise" cuts who would be welcome additions to our team.

Here is my second and final official roster projection for the 2009-2010 NFL season, taking into consideration how things have gone throughout training camp and how I expect Mangini to react:

Pos Final Roster Players Cut
QB Brady Quinn
Derek Anderson
Brett Ratliff
Richard Bartel*
RB Jamal Lewis
James Davis
Jerome Harrison
Chris Jennings*
Noah Herron
FB Lawrence Vickers
Charles Ali

WR Braylon Edwards
Joshua Cribbs
Mike Furrey
Mohamed Massaquoi
Brian Robiskie
David Patten
Paul Hubbard
Lance Leggett*
Jordan Norwood
TE Robert Royal
Steve Heiden
Martin Rucker
Aaron Walker
OL Joe Thomas
Eric Steinbach
Alex Mack
Floyd Womack
John St. Clair
Hank Fraley
Rex Hadnot
Isaac Sowells
Dustin Fry*
Kurt Quarterman
Branndon Braxton
Corey Hilliard
Pat Murray
DL Robaire Smith
Shaun Rogers
Kenyon Coleman
Corey Williams
C.J. Mosley
Ahtyba Rubin
Brian Schaefering
Santonio Thomas
Adam Hoppel
 
LB Kamerion Wimbley
D'Qwell Jackson
Eric Barton
Alex Hall
David Bowens
Leon Williams
David Veikune
Kaluka Maiava
Blake Costanzo
Beau Bell*
Titus Brown
Marcus Benard*
S Brodney Pool
Abram Elam
Mike Adams
Nick Sorensen
Hamza Abdullah
Bret Lockett*
Tra Battle
CB Eric Wright
Brandon McDonald
Corey Ivy
Hank Poteat
Coye Francies
Gerard Lawson
Brandon Anderson
ST Ryan Pontbriand
Phil Dawson
Dave Zastudil

Here are some notes about my roster:

53-Man Roster Projection Notes

  • One of the biggest "wow" factors will be if Jamal Lewis gets cut. Today, Adam Schefter of ESPN listed Lewis as one of the "bubble" players on his list. Lewis has not looked very quick in training camp, while James Davis has taken advantage of Jerome Harrison being out. I just don't see us outright cutting Lewis.
  • The following offensive players are gone from the "Final Roster" column since my pre-training camp projection: George Foster, Ryan Tucker.
  • Taking their spots on offense are Hank Fraley and David Patten. I'm not fond of having six receivers, but I don't think we'll be seeing much of Brian Robiskie early on this season, except maybe on special teams. I also added Isaac Sowells, which literally kills me to do so. As many of you know, I am not fond of Sowells' abilities. But, we need tackle depth and he has the most experience there.
  • The following defensive players are gone from the "Final Roster" column since my pre-training camp projection: Shaun Smith, Roderick Hood.
  • Taking their spots on defense are Gerard Lawson, with no replacement defensive lineman. Lawson can contribute on special teams and serve as the backup returner to Cribbs.
  • Most of the players who could make the 53-man roster as a surprise are the players I've put on the practice squad (denoted by an *). Specifically, these players include Bret Lockett (who could make it over Nick Sorensen) and Marucs Benard (who could make it over Leon Williams). Beau Bell could also make it instead of Benard. I'd really like to keep Blake Costanzo; our special teams has been fantastic this preseason.
  • I don't think Chris Jennings makes the roster unless we make a surprise cut of Jerome Harrison. However, I still think Noah Herron has a good chance of making it over Charles Ali. Ultimately, I'm taking Ali because of Vickers' injury problems last year.
  • Brett Ratliff probably won't clear the waiver wire, but Richard Bartel will. I like Bartel over Ratliff at this point, but doing it this way allows us to retain both of them, considering what we invested in Ratliff.
  • We should carry three tight ends. I think the questions of Steve Heiden making the roster or not are a thing of the past, considering Martin Rucker and Aaron Walker have done very little this preseason.
  • If we keep a seventh defensive lineman, I guess it would be Santonio Thomas.

Please leave your own roster notes as a response to this post!

Comment 60 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

RB

Noah Herron only played briefly early on in the first quarter, as did James Davis. Jerome Harrison and Jamal Lewis did not play. This may mean that all four have made the team or that we will carry Herron until Harrison is healthy. It is quite possible that Harrison will start the year on the PUP list.

by Bumblyjack on Sep 4, 2009 8:40 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think you can place players on the PUP at this point. I believe they can only go on that list if there injury was from before training camp (and the decision has to be made before camp starts).

The thing about Harrison though is that he supposedly returned to practice this week, so he might be healthy enough to go.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Sep 4, 2009 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

herron only played briefly cause he got hurt

by kjc on Sep 4, 2009 10:08 PM EDT reply actions  

I am going Herron over Ali. I wouldn’t be surprised if both weren’t with the team if it gave us a chance to take a RB we like who is cut by another team.

Also, can we please find someone cut by another team or off the street who is better than Sowells?

by rufio on Sep 4, 2009 10:38 PM EDT reply actions  

You called it.

Both paragraphs

" Of course Steroids should be allowed! I wanna see 700 foot home runs and 90 yard field goals! I litterally want to see someone's d**k get shoved in the dirt!"

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Sep 7, 2009 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think that the Browns will keep Jennings after his performance on Thursday night and cut Ali.

The Browns will compensate for the lack of FB depth by using TEs and other RBs in the backfield for certain formations.

http://dawgscooper.blogspot.com/
Dawg Scooper: An Unofficial Cleveland Browns News Source

by theW0LF on Sep 4, 2009 11:10 PM EDT reply actions  

My issue with that is how would we use Jennings this year, assuming that Jamal Lewis is getting the starts? Davis and Harrison will be lucky enough to get some snaps. Jennings did show some flash on special teams, but surely Harrison/Davis can contribute there if needed.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Sep 4, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. There’s no way Jennings can make a meaningful enough contribution to make the final 53. I could see him making the practice squad, but that’s also not a given as far as I’m concerned. I also like Herron to make it over Ali just because of his versatility.

by Onyx Lightning on Sep 4, 2009 11:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Why? You keep a player because he played well in the fourth preseason game against mostly third-stringers?

Running backs like Jennings are a dime-a-dozen. If we have injury problems during the season and need another RB then we can find a guy like him on the street. He’s not worth wasting a roster spot on.

by Buckeye Brad on Sep 4, 2009 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree with you there. He was running like a man on fire, and he was blocking decently. I see us cutting a fullback to keep him, even if only on the pratice squad. We have enough tight ends to play the blocking role…

by Uriah33 on Sep 5, 2009 12:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

I could see him on the practice squad, he’s just not making the 53-man roster. We don’t need a fourth running back.

by Buckeye Brad on Sep 5, 2009 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right. When it comes to the last 5 or so spots on the roster, you don’t really care who makes the better 4th string RB or 7th WR, you care who can be the better special teamer. I don’t see Jennings making it on this criteria.

by Ryan Kelsey on Sep 5, 2009 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think Jennings was almost blocking kicks one game in the preseason?

" Of course Steroids should be allowed! I wanna see 700 foot home runs and 90 yard field goals! I litterally want to see someone's d**k get shoved in the dirt!"

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Sep 7, 2009 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

You don’t have to cut anyone from the 53 to put Jennings on the practice squad. We would actually have to put Jennings on waivers and have him clear waivers to put him on the squad, I believe. Neither Ali nor Vickers is practice squad eligible, so we couldn’t even “cut” them from the ’squad.

by rufio on Sep 5, 2009 2:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

“Running backs like Jennings are a dime-a-dozen”

I completely disagree with this, because if running backs were so easy to find, then why are teams still lacking a running game?

http://dawgscooper.blogspot.com/
Dawg Scooper: An Unofficial Cleveland Browns News Source

by theW0LF on Sep 5, 2009 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

then why are teams still lacking a running game

Because good offensive lines are hard to find. And because there are only a handful of backs who can succeed without having a good line in front of them (Jennings probably not being one of them).

by APV on Sep 5, 2009 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Once again, it was a preseason game. Let’s see him run like that consistantly in the regular season before we start giving him all this praise. Do you really think we would have a successful running game if he was our lead back? There’s a reason this guy wasn’t on any NFL team a month ago — he’s not that special.

Great running backs are hard to find. Average running backs are a dime-a-dozen (and we don’t even know if Jennings is good enough to be called “average”).

You really need to stop getting so excited about players who play well in preseason games against players who will never see the field in the regular season. If you’ve watched the Browns at all over the past decade then you know we’ve seen many players who look like stars in the preseason then do nothing in the regular season (Lee Suggs, anyone?).

by Buckeye Brad on Sep 5, 2009 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with what you say about playing well in a preseason game. Whether or not a complete first string defense is in the game,a good running back should have a solid performance and be exciting to watch.

This is the problem I now have with Jamal Lewis. I was never excited to watch him studder step to the line and fall foward. I am officially on the “get rid of him now wagon” because I don’t think he makes our running game that much better.

Keep the younger kids and let them run with passion.

Fooootball has been beary beary good to me.

by doggrad87 on Sep 5, 2009 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

People were also saying Sorensen looked good in that game. I’ve seen enough of Sorensen to believe he is completely incapable of having a meaningful positive impact on a game in the regular season on a consistent basis.

by rufio on Sep 5, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

There are fans that wanted Bartel over Ratliff solely because of 2 preseason games.

by Roger Dorn on Sep 7, 2009 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who cares about Bart vs. Ratliff. If we have to use one of them were screwed anyway

" Of course Steroids should be allowed! I wanna see 700 foot home runs and 90 yard field goals! I litterally want to see someone's d**k get shoved in the dirt!"

by BradyQuinnisBeast on Sep 7, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I really hope we aren’t down to our 3rd QB again. That would suck. Bartel does have a big arm, and there is some upside to him, but I couldn’t see Ratliff not making this team.

by rufio on Sep 7, 2009 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

We certainly saw some nice runs from Jennings, albeit against backups, but was there anything more? I recall him grabbing a few passes. I wasn’t able to watch the entire game, so I truly don’t know whether he can block – and that would be a big sticking point, I would think. If he can’t pick up the blitzes we could end the season with Ratliff running the offense. If he can block, is he better at it than Harrison? If the answer is no, then we have to hope we can get him on the practice squad.

by JustBob on Sep 5, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m excited for the season to start. And not to be negative, but can we agree that the Robiskie pick was misguided?

by dgcambridge on Sep 5, 2009 12:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Maybe so when you see what we could have had in the picks between him and Massaquoi. Lots of good defensive prospects including Maualuga who went to the rival Bengals. I’m thinking Coach Mangini would not have taken Malaluga no matter what because of a perception of issues with him off the field—it just wouldn’t fit with the rest of what he picked. I think he is avoiding character issues right now until he gets a motivated, professional core. I also liked Everette Brown as a book end to Wimbley and he could have been picked at that point. And there were 5 or so decent-looking defensive backs taken right after the Robiskie pick. I always wondered if Clay Matthews Jr or Laurinitus would have been available would we have drafted one of them in Robiskie’s spot?
I was thinking Robiskie was going to be a lot better given the hype that he was the most NFL-ready receiver coming out of college this year. I was a little surprised to see us pick up 2 receivers at that point in the draft when it seemed like we had more needs on defense. My hunch at the time was that Edwards might be traded and that didn’t happen.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Sep 5, 2009 1:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think that was our most questionable pick. You can’t evaluate a draft class until at least the 3rd season after they’re picked. Calling him a bust before the season even starts is a little ridiculous.

by rufio on Sep 5, 2009 2:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hey, I’ve been hit with “ridiculous” twice today on this board. I was careful with my language above. Certainly not calling anyone a bust (isn’t a bust someone who can’t make it the league?). 3 years out is a fine time to evaluate things – if you can avoid the hindsight temptation.

by dgcambridge on Sep 5, 2009 3:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

There is no need for that sensitivity. First, I said “a little ridiculous”, and second, I wasn’t calling you an idiot, I was saying that what you were saying was a little ridiculous. People here are intelligent and will debate things that they think are not logically sound, proven with evidence, etc. If you are up for that level of football talk, welcome to the club.

There have been zero meaningful games that Robiskie could have played in so far, and WR is a position that traditionally has to make a big adjustment to the NFL. Judging him now is a little ridiculous, and I bring up his level of success to this point because I don’t think anyone would be calling the Robo pick “misguided” if he had torn it up in the preseason.

It is way, way, way too early to judge the ultimate success of the pick, and to judge the success of any draft pick at this point in time with a large degree of confidence is, in fact, ridiculous. But you really didn’t say that (I just read into your comment that you implied that, or I implied that you wouldn’t have said what you did if the light had gone on for Robiskie in the preseason), you said that the pick was misguided:

WR was one of the biggest positions of need in April, before we knew how Furrey would look (or what the deal was really with his “concussion”), before we found out Cribbs looked like he could play well enough to be our 2nd WR, and when our 2nd and 3rd WRs from last year were probably not going to play for a while (Stallworth) and not good enough to play at most powerhouse D1 schools (Steptoe). Throw in the fact that we traded K2 (who was in effect our #2 WR) and there was a bigtime need there. We needed WRs, we took WRs. Based on Robiskie’s professionalism throughout not only his OSU career, but also the pre-draft process, he looked like the most NFL-ready WR. He perfectly fit the bill of the “Mangini guy”.

Every draft pick is a gamble. Some will work out, some won’t. You take 2 WRs and you figure one of them will probably work out. You only take one, and you have half the chance that he will develop in to a good player. All you can do as a GM is get the best odds of success on your picks.

So no, it wasn’t misguided. I did think there were better players on the board, but I didn’t think Brown could drop in to coverage, and I thought it was early for the other players I liked (D. Butler, Brace, Barwin). I did like Britton, but am not sure if he can play RT. I thought Sintim would have been an OK pick. But, I/we/all the national pundits must have lacked some information that every NFL team had. Everyone had Maualuga going in the 1st round, and his stock plummeted—which was a surprise to everyone on draft day.

Simply put; I didn’t think Robiskie was an ideal pick, but I didn’t see a clear alternative. I think he was the best player on the board at WR at the time—one of our biggest needs.

by rufio on Sep 5, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

i see lockett over sorensen and herron over ali.

Cleveland and OSU homer

by rockybrown on Sep 5, 2009 12:23 AM EDT reply actions  

I heard a rumor that the Browns were interested in a QB a couple of weeks ago that got cut by… I don’t remember (maybe the Pats?). Anyway, I think this indicates that they may be looking to get rid of Ratliff AND Bartel or to at least up grade them. It is probably likely that Ratliff will be retained as Coach Mangini went way out of his way to pick him up. I thought Bartel looked just as good as Ratliff in the limited action he saw, and he looked better in the practice I attended.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Sep 5, 2009 1:08 AM EDT reply actions  

That QB ended up being traded, I think the Browns were looking to do the same sort of deal by claiming him and trading him to someone who was actually interested.

by Roger Dorn on Sep 7, 2009 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

DL Schaefering

Was his performance just beating up the 3rd string, or did he show any real spark?

We need some options at DE!

by LondonBrown on Sep 5, 2009 5:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Cutting Jamal seems like a stupid option to me. Absolutely idiotic.

Sure, we may have a good halfback in Davis, but this is his rookie season. Even if Jamal doesn’t start I sure would like Jamal in there helping Davis out. We can’t put everything on Davis.

by skipkirk on Sep 5, 2009 6:10 AM EDT reply actions  

By help out I mean with experience and tips and all that sorta mentor stuff.

by skipkirk on Sep 5, 2009 6:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. We are putting to much emphasis on the pre-season performances which really means nothing. I hope Davis turns out to be what we all want him to be, but you just don’t cut someone like Lewis…

Joey_D

by Joey_D on Sep 5, 2009 7:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

No to FB Ali, they will only keep Vickers
No to WR Patten, too big of a contract
No to LB Leon Williams, he is terrible and barely played in the preseason
Yes to DT Adam Hoppel, he is the only of the 3 that might get cut that can play all 3 positions on the d-line

The 2 remaining spots will be filled by waiver claims.

Otherwise, nicely done

by Brownsfan4life on Sep 5, 2009 8:44 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah… no Leon Williams, I prefer Beau Bell or Titus Brown on special teams.

by skipkirk on Sep 5, 2009 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think there are going to be a few surprises today, and I think we’ll probably add at least two guys who aren’t currently on the roster

by APV on Sep 5, 2009 8:58 AM EDT reply actions  

I have Beau Bell and Bret Lockett instead of Blake Costanzo and Nick Sorensen.

Also, I think Mangini may add a ninth offensive lineman if we get a chance at someone decent (It would have to be a 4+ year veteran because the Lions, Rams, Chiefs, or Seahawks would gobble up a younger waiver guy. Barry Sims and Tony Pashos are on the chopping block right now. It would have to be someone like that for us to get a shot.).

I have Ali, Lawson, Patten, and Sowells making the team but they would be among the first cuts if we claim someone.

I decided that Ali’s ability as an up man on the punt team and as a lead blocker for Vickers in short yardage situations is more valuable than what Herron brings as a 4th running back and kick coverage man.

by Bumblyjack on Sep 5, 2009 9:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Don’t you go to the end of the waivers line when you pick someone up? Our claim on the NE QB didn’t go through because Detroit got him, so aren’t they at the end of the line now?

by rufio on Sep 5, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure in this case, but my take was that the worst team in the league always gets first priority.

by Roger Dorn on Sep 7, 2009 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Heiden = victory

Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.

by BringBackKosar on Sep 5, 2009 10:40 AM EDT reply actions  

Jennings and Davis= Browns Smash and Dash

cut lewis he can’t run anymore. How can they have a starting running back who can’t run! it makes no sense. Cut him, start Quinn and let these two young guys be the 1 and 2 backs and do what they were born to do. Go Browns!

by Cavs4 life on Sep 5, 2009 12:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Once again…..let’s see these guys do this in the regular season before we start proclaiming their greatness. We’re not going to cut Lewis — we can give Davis some carries in the regular season and see how he does. If he looks this good against first team defenses then he’ll get more carries. But let’s not get too excited about guys performing well in the preseason against backups.

Jennings is nothing special. There’s a reason he was a free agent one month ago.

by Buckeye Brad on Sep 5, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am having a hard time believing we actually benefit from cutting Lewis. Someone had a 7th rounder for Louis Leonard, someone has a draft pick for Lewis if we really want to get rid of him.

And, he got some guaranteed money so its not like we would free up cap space; his signing bonus will accelerate in to the cap this year. its only a roster spot, and I’d rather have Lewis over Jennings, Herron, or Ali.

by rufio on Sep 5, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right. People are getting way too excited over a few preseason games and think we have a bunch of great running backs waiting in the wings. What benefit do we get from cutting Lewis? If he looks bad over the first few games then Davis will get more carries and maybe — maybe — take over the starting job. But if people think we’re going to cut Lewis to rely on guys like Herron and Jennings then I think that’s crazy.

by Buckeye Brad on Sep 5, 2009 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really don’t think Lewis could net us a draft pick. He is obviously a better player than Leonard but the acquiring team also assumes his contract, which in the case of Leonard was nothing. High priced players, older “name” players get cut all the time because team’s don’t want to trade the future of a guy they will have under contract for 6 years for a guy on his last legs for at best a year or two.

by Roger Dorn on Sep 7, 2009 12:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not even a 7th rounder? I really think that pick is out there. Lewis’ contract is short, it would be a really sellable move to a fan base, and a GM could make a high-upside move (acquiring a goal-line back, a veteran to spell younger players, etc.) for very little risk.

It would be hard not to do as a GM for a contending team who needed to win now and wouldn’t have much room for 7th rounders on the roster anyway. The Cards would have that pick, particularly if Beanie goes down or Hightower gets cranky because he isn’t starting.

by rufio on Sep 7, 2009 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s close. I think teams if they knew Lewis was being offered in a trade would know the Browns don’t want him and would likely cut him if they couldn’t find a taker. In that case, the contract is null and a team can take a chance on him for something on a small one year deal.

by Roger Dorn on Sep 7, 2009 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Similar to what happened to Shaun Alexander with the Seahawks.

by Roger Dorn on Sep 7, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Browns Regular and Postseason 09'10 Projected Record: 19-0

The Browns will accomplish this season what New England was unable to 2 years ago. It will be the greatest Cinderella story in sports history. Any Given Sunday.

Breakdown Top 3 Skill Position Comparisons to 07’08 Pats
QB
07’Pats-Brady 09’ Browns-Quinn
Adv-Pats

RB
07’Pats-Maroney 09’ Browns-Davis, Jennings
Adv-Browns

WR
07’Pats-Moss, Stallworth, Welker 09’Browns Edwards, Cribbs, Furrey
Adv-Browns

by Cavs4 life on Sep 5, 2009 12:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Wow. And I thought I was being optimistic.

by Buckeye Brad on Sep 5, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, calling Davis and Jennings with the advantage over the Pats’ backfield! And our WRs over the Pats’! Hahaha.

by rufio on Sep 5, 2009 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m getting slightly annoyed over all the Jennings praise. That game meant absolutly nothing and nobody understands that. I’m presuming this post to be extremely facetious of course.

by SpecialBrownie on Sep 5, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think this guy just has no clue what he’s talking about.

by Buckeye Brad on Sep 5, 2009 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

19-0 HA!
I’m not laughing at you, I’m laughing with you. But hey, you never know, right? haha

by Brownie's Year on Sep 5, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wonder if we’ll pick up another OT. The Bengals just cut Augustus Parrish.

by NM Dawg on Sep 5, 2009 3:31 PM EDT reply actions  

I hope we do. I share the disdain for Sowells.

by APV on Sep 5, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / @# / !@
Small
Top 5 Bubble Players
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Buddhathomas_small
Cleveland Browns 2012 Prediction - A Sailor's Perspective
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / !^ / !@
Cribbs_small
2012 Rookie Predictions
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
A look of the 2012 Browns O-line
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / ( / !@
00000021_small
browns Q for 12 who are they
Gray_cat_thinking_small
That time of year again.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Hadenward-new2_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

N3tdgy_medium_small Brownie's Year

Polar_cap_of_mars_planet_small notthatnoise