Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Randy Moss A Raven?

Cribbs For Mashall

With both players, Joshua Cribbs and Brandon Marshall dissatisfied with their current situations what are the chances of a possible trade? Either a straight trade, player for player or the browns throwing in an extra pick in this years draft. Any takers?

The Browns desperately need a proven receiver but Marshall may not fit into the mold that Mangini is trying to form. With a problematic past is it worth dealing with another Braylon Edwards? I think not but if he could keep his ego in check I would love to see him in browns and orange.

http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_14136532

"He completely cleaned out his locker yesterday" reported the Denver post. Sound familiar? 

This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.

Comment 216 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

There is no way the Browns would want another ‘diva’ WR.

Plus, IF (and I do mean IF) the Browns trade Cribbs, they will overvalue him and I wouldn’t be surprised if they asked for 2-1st round picks in a trade.

I know that sounds crazy, but with 3 years left on his contract, the Browns do hold all of the cards in this matter.

Minimum asking price should be a 1st round and 3rd round pick, IF the Browns want to trade him.

http://dawgscooper.blogspot.com/
Dawg Scooper: An Unofficial Cleveland Browns Source

by theW0LF on Jan 7, 2010 8:07 PM EST reply actions  

Minimum asking price should be a 1st round

…and mid-to-high 1st round at that given Cribbs’ stock around the league right now.

"I don’t dance too much." --Mike Holmgren

by johnnyphoenix on Jan 7, 2010 8:21 PM EST up reply actions  

They would be so many suitors, I’m pretty sure that almost every team in the league would line up and start offering 1st rounds picks.

I don’t want it to happen and it shouldn’t because Holmgren needs to fix this and give Cribbs a real offer once he’s done hiring his front office staff and scouting department.

http://dawgscooper.blogspot.com/
Dawg Scooper: An Unofficial Cleveland Browns Source

by theW0LF on Jan 7, 2010 8:29 PM EST up reply actions  

*There not They

whoops

http://dawgscooper.blogspot.com/
Dawg Scooper: An Unofficial Cleveland Browns Source

by theW0LF on Jan 7, 2010 8:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you guys are over valuing his trade status. No team will give up a first round draft pick for a special teams player, even if he is the best in the league at what he does.

Have you ever seen a team (outside the raiders) use a first rounder on a special teams player?

by Dawgs Bite Back on Jan 7, 2010 8:41 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I was laughing insanely when he said he was worth 2 first rounders.

We won’t get more than a 2nd round pick out of him.

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 7, 2010 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

i agree he isn’t worth that, but that’s what they’ll be asking. they have no real incentive to trade the guy, so they can set his trade value really high in the hopes that some team (the raiders) makes a stupid move.

by notthatnoise on Jan 7, 2010 10:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I would love two of the Raiders’ top 10 draft picks in the next two years.

by rufio on Jan 8, 2010 2:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Throw in Ndamdi and I’ll be happy, well not happy, but content.

by Simmsinns on Jan 8, 2010 4:19 AM EST up reply actions  

i’m glad you’re being facetious.

i’d give Cribbs and a grab-bag of 5th and 6th round picks for Asomugha.

You are reading my signature.

by rolub on Jan 8, 2010 9:01 AM EST up reply actions  

They already gave one up for Seymour

by TheRealSlimShady on Jan 8, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Then I’ll take their top-10 draft picks in the next 3 years.

by rufio on Jan 11, 2010 3:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Thank you, at least you know what and where I’m coming from.

http://dawgscooper.blogspot.com/
Dawg Scooper: An Unofficial Cleveland Browns Source

by theW0LF on Jan 8, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Obviously you do not understand how a team can overvalue players hoping that another team is stupid enough to do the trade anyway.

That’s what teams do in this kind of situation.

http://dawgscooper.blogspot.com/
Dawg Scooper: An Unofficial Cleveland Browns Source

by theW0LF on Jan 8, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Obviously, you were way to optimistic and you’re acting like you know a FO like the back of your hand.

Only the Raiders are that stupid.

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 8, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Its not like this is devin hester. devin hester returns kicks and thats all he can do (he drops every ball thrown to him).

1. Cribbs is one of the best kick/punt returners in HISTORY.

2. Cribbs is also one of the most valuable gunners in the league. He makes a lot of takles in punt coverage and also is key when the browns down the ball near the goal line (which has happened a lot thanks to him)

3. Cribbs has better hands as a receiver than hester and when he gets targets, he is decent.

4. He was a QB in college so he can run the wildcat and pass it occasionally if need be.

5. He is great running the ball. He ran the ball great this year and is dangerous running the ball b/c he is so hard to bring down.

So you are really trading for a guy who can do it all pretty well. Besides returns he is not a star at anything but he does so much for you team that is invaluable. plus if used more in an offense, he can be the type of guy who has to be accounted for on every down, whether it is running a route, taking a handoff, or running the wildcat.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 2:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Most valuable gunner = oxymoron.

by rufio on Jan 8, 2010 2:58 AM EST up reply actions  

ehhh.he gets 20-30 tackles consistently every year for a gunner which doesn’t seem like much but it is very high for that position. he also downed or assisted in downing, about 10 punts inside the 5 and stopped them from rolling into the end zone. that is invaluable in the game of field position, so are his returns and his stops of punt returners…I do agree that a gunner isn’t an important position but it is one of the more important special teams positions. by itself, a valuable gunner isn’t valuable but when you look at the big picture, you can see why a team would want to give up a high pick for him…

These are 2 teams that feasibly might trade for him…the packers the colts and the saints

The packers and saints had 2 of the worst punt coverage teams and the colts weren’t very good. The packers also had a lot of touchbacks. both the colts and the saints were horrible on kickoff coverage (which cribbs does too) and the packers weren’t far behind. all of these teams also were horrible on punt and kick returns (bottom 5-10 in the league). all of these teams have defined QBs but could benefit from the wildcat. the saints also like having versatility in their backfield (lots of running backs, reggie bush is versatile), the packers could use a guy to take a little load off ryan grant, and the colts don’t have a guy who can run inside like cribbs. he could be useful on all of these teams and they might not give up a first rounder, it might be possible b/c they are all good teams with late first rounder…since they are good, these are the types of teams that might just need one piece to win a championship and a good return game would definitely help.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 3:49 AM EST up reply actions  

you listed three teams not two

by jsneides on Jan 8, 2010 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

actually i take that back … none of what you said makes sense … so it was wrong of me to pick out that one flaw

all of these teams have defined QBs but could benefit from the wildcat.

the colts and the saints dont run wildcat cause they have freaking awesome QBs. If the Dolphins had Manning or Brees they wouldnt run the wildcat either.

the packers could use a guy to take a little load off ryan grant, and the colts don’t have a guy who can run inside like cribbs.

i dont really see cribbs as an “inside” runner. he usually breaks it out to the side to get his yardage.

these are the types of teams that might just need one piece to win a championship and a good return game would definitely help.

ummm im pretty sure the colts and saints have a pretty good championship team .. they arent missing any pieces.

by jsneides on Jan 8, 2010 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Cribbs is more of a power runner which is why I was talking about him as a runner. the point is (not as much the packers but) the colts and the saints could use a player like him. not only are they some of the worst teams in the league in returns but also the worst in containing punt returners (another cribbs specialty). even if they don’t use cribbs in the wildcat, it doesn’t matter. desmond howard was a first round draft choice specifically because of his return skills. he was drafted by the super bowl champions as a luxury pick. to the colts and the saints this year, that first rounder is also somewhat of a luxury pick. with that, it does make some sense to fix their biggest area of need: special teams.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

i see your point. but when is any pick a luxury pick? especially in the first round. the point of a great franchise or a team in general is to always be restocking players for the future. why would any team waste a pick on something that is really in the grand scheme of things not that hard to get. yes i think cribbs is a game changer but is someone like him necessary? no and that is shown by the two teams that you picked out. both playoff teams and super bowl contenders. and they have sub par special teams. ive seen most of your posts on here about this luxury pick and personally i think its pretty ridiculous. no team goes in the draft and says “hmm well we are pretty good … F—— it! we will take this dude who is one of the best special teamers out there.” there is a purpose for every pick in the first round.

by jsneides on Jan 8, 2010 6:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I understand that. I am not saying it will happen but it is a possibility. around the trade deadline his value mightve been an early-mid 3rd rounder…mangini supposedly talked to the dolphins and asked for their mid-late second rounder and they gave it serious thought. now that he broke out in the second half, a second rounder doesn’t seem out of the question since teams were considering it. all i am doing is speculation and I admit it…but at the same time, i am stating likely places he might be traded.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 10:56 PM EST up reply actions  

mangini supposedly talked to the dolphins and asked for their mid-late second rounder and they gave it serious thought.

I am not trying to be a d*ck here, but where was this reported? I never heard anything about offers. All I ever read was that the Dolphins were interested in Cribbs.

I have a hard time believing that Mangini would have turned down a third rounder for Cribbs. BE got us a 3rd and a 5th.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 9, 2010 12:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I poked around a bit on this subject and never saw a specific offer mentioned from the Dolphins. Doesn’t mean it’s not out there, of course. They did talk to us more than once about Cribbs.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Jan 9, 2010 1:37 AM EST up reply actions  

It was on Rotoworld.

by emily522 on Jan 9, 2010 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Did you find specific offers there, Emily? All I saw was comments about a discussion, without them saying just what we wanted or what the Dolphins offered. Idle curiosity at this point I guess….

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Jan 9, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m pretty sure it just said Mangini asked for a second rounder. But now I can’t remember if they were talking about offers before the trading deadline or trade offers now.

by emily522 on Jan 9, 2010 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

yes. i heard they wanted cribbs, we wanted a second rounder and they seriously considered it. they didn’t outright object it. i am just saying that this was before he had the explosive second half. a second rounder now looks very possible.

by bross09 on Jan 9, 2010 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Apparently you don’t realize that when a player is still under contract, then the team still hold all the cards and can put any price tag they want on that player.

The Browns will overvalue Cribbs be cause they can, and they do not want to really lose him, therefore if a team really wants to give up 1st rounders for him, then the Browns win in taking advantage of a team that was willing to do the trade.

http://dawgscooper.blogspot.com/
Dawg Scooper: An Unofficial Cleveland Browns Source

by theW0LF on Jan 8, 2010 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

there are teams that might be willing, especially good teams with bad special teams play who don’t have a lot of holes and view a first rounder as somewhat of a luxury (saints). desmond howard was drafted high and he was just a return specialist. he was drafted by the defending super bowl champs as a luxury pick. trading cribbs to the saints for their pick is a luxury pick for them b/c they are the worst special teams team in the league.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I really, really, really doubt we could get a 1st, much less that we’d have a line.

Other GMs reportedly valued Cribbs at 2.5-3.2 million/year. Does that sound like a 1st round pick to you?

by rufio on Jan 8, 2010 2:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Was desmon howard worth picking in the first round?? He wasn’t much of a receiver but the caliber returner of cribbs. I would say, for the team, yes. it was the redskins and they just won the superbowl. look at the teams I suggested. the packers, the colts and the saints are all playoff teams, 2 have byes. these teams consider their first round pick somewhat of a luxury anyways. all 3 of these teams have horrendous special teams play especially the saints who let Kick returners get 25 yards per kick, when they only get about 22…they get only about 4-5 yds per punt when their opponents get 15. those numbers don’t seem like a lot but they effect field position significantly. for a team that is one of the best in the league but doesn’t have good special teams, this actually makes sense. imagine what peyton manning could do when each drive starts 6-10 yards closer to the end zone…he can do a lot.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 3:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Was desmon howard worth picking in the first round??

No.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 8, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Desmond Howard can’t pronounce if his life depended on it. He is second in worse talking commentator next to LOU HOLPPPTZ!

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 8, 2010 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

lets not leave shannon sharpe out of this discussion

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jan 11, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

SPHHHHHHHHHANNON SHARPHHHHE!

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 11, 2010 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree but it was done. it was done by a defending super bowl champ who considered the pick a luxury. my point is thata team like indy or the saints if they make it far in the playoffs might consider their first rounder a luxury pick. with that said, both teams are some of the worst in the league in special teams play so would really benefit from cribbs. indy could also benefit from his running too.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

you’re coming off like the Browns yet-to-be-named GM talking himself into why he should expect a 1st round pick in return for a special-teams player.

You are reading my signature.

by rolub on Jan 8, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t see how i am coming off like a GM candidate more than anyone else here. I am just stating that it is feasible with the stock of cribbs high, that a elite team with horrible special teams play might want to make a trade like that.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

The Redskins didn’t draft Howard as a KR. He was a WR first and foremost.

Just because that was the only thing he excelled at is different.

It is like saying the Saints drafted Reggie Bush as a KR.

It is nice side dish, but not the main course.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 8, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought he was a DB…

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 8, 2010 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Hester was the DB, Woodson the reciever.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Jan 8, 2010 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Crap. Hester and Woodson were the DBs, Howard the Receiver.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Jan 8, 2010 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Are we thinking of the same Howard?

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 8, 2010 3:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Desmond? He was a receiver and returner at Michigan and Woodson was the guy that was the DB that returned kicks also.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Jan 8, 2010 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Okay so we are. Still thought he was a DB though. I knew who Woodson was.

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 8, 2010 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

still arguing that desmond howard is a receiver first is like arguing that cribbs is a receiver. cribbs might be about as good of a receiver as howard was in he NFL. he had one season where he put up the numbers of a number 3 option is a good offense…besides that he was invisible on offense and just did returns. honestly cribbs might be more valuable than howard was so i can see logically a team in the late first wanting to trade for him.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe they did but they drafted him mostly for his return skills. they already had good receivers. they would have drafted him higher purely as a kick returner than as a receiver. they had a lot of picks that year plus they were the defending super bowl champions. they considered the pick a luxury pick and they used it on a luxury…if the saints win the super bowl i can see the same scenario for them b/c they have the worst special teams unit by far and cribbs would be invaluable to them…i am not saying it will happen but just that it is a possibility…probably not likely tho…but they might consider giving up their late second rounder. there was some interest in cribbs by teams before the trade deadline and mangini supposedly wanted a 2nd rounder…teams then were seriously cosidering it so its likely that they will take serious consideration now.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 10:53 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah. for a wide receiver that played in the league 11 years he had 123 receptions and 1,597 yards. wes welker or andre johnson had almost as good of a year as his whole CAREER in receiving. the average season for desmond howard was 11 receptions for about 145 yds and about half a touchdown (he scored a passing touchdown every other yr). cribbs this year honestly had maybe a better receiving season than desmond howard’s average season.

Saying desmond howard was a WR first and foremost is like saying mike furrey is a Safety. or cribbs is foremost a WR. these are things the players can do but not something they honestly do a lot. howard put up great college numbers but no one used him as a receiver in the pros. this is b/c they knew he was just a college phenom and would only be a return specialist in the pros. the Redskins however had just won the superbowl so their pick was somewhat of a luxury so they picked a returner b/c their return game was suspect.

the difference between desmond howard and bush is that bush actually produced on offense. the first couple years on offense howard did nothing but in his contract year, he had ONE good season. this season he had 40 receptions, 727 yds and 5 TDs. that is the highlight of his career and bush performed better this season (and it was maybe his least productive season of his career). howard was not utilized as a receiver (except for 1 season) for good reason. he went a 5 year stretch after leaving the redskins with only 8 receptions during those 5 years.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

while i agree with this, the point being made was that some team did it, so its possible it could happen again. I don’t think it will, but its possible.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jan 11, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

i was just talking possibility. likelihood, probably not much. we might b able to get Miami’s second rounder and then some though…

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

….is it worth dealing with another Braylon Edwards?

Oh, I think we all know the answer to that question.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Jan 7, 2010 8:10 PM EST reply actions  

No. God no.

We just spent this last season getting rid of malcontents and then we sign Braylon II? Granted, he’s better on the field but listen; this guy acted like an ass, apologized, went all lovey-dovey with McDanials and then morphed right back into ass mode when things hit the shitter.

Asshole.
Selfish.
Doesn’t learn from mistakes.
Dishonest.

"I don’t dance too much." --Mike Holmgren

by johnnyphoenix on Jan 7, 2010 8:17 PM EST reply actions  

I’d rather take a mid-tier player in a position that is a priority for us and some nice draft picks. Of course, as a last resort. All in all I’m banking on this getting resolved more than anything. Let’s not jump the gun just yet.

"I don’t dance too much." --Mike Holmgren

by johnnyphoenix on Jan 7, 2010 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

The Redskins have two Number one picks. Brandon Marshall is an ass.

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Jan 7, 2010 8:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d hear what the ’skins have to say….

"I don’t dance too much." --Mike Holmgren

by johnnyphoenix on Jan 8, 2010 6:48 AM EST up reply actions  

i can say with fairly hog certainty that we won’t be making that trade. we have a great player who is under contract to us: we have all the leverage. why trade him for a much more expensive player who also happens to be a royal shithead? i wouldn’t think either holmgren or mangini would want to touch marshall with a 10 meter cattle prod.

by Dawg Nuts on Jan 7, 2010 9:27 PM EST reply actions  

i think “fairly hog certainty” has become a DBN meme

by notthatnoise on Jan 7, 2010 10:40 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

No, probably not…but if we can do some discreet shopping why not have a few…‘discussions?’

"I don’t dance too much." --Mike Holmgren

by johnnyphoenix on Jan 8, 2010 6:49 AM EST up reply actions  

…so let’s negotiate with Cribbs all the while testing the waters a bit…can’t hurt. Unless he hears it, of course. So Shhhhhh. There’s plenty of avenues and ways to say ‘make us an offer’ without advertising it.

"I don’t dance too much." --Mike Holmgren

by johnnyphoenix on Jan 8, 2010 6:55 AM EST up reply actions  

i don’t think he’d mind hearing about it. he said he wanted to be traded or signed to bigger money.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jan 11, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

If we could have pulled a Ditka for Ricky Williams or a Herschel Walker trade I’d do it…lol.

"I don’t dance too much." --Mike Holmgren

by johnnyphoenix on Jan 8, 2010 6:59 AM EST up reply actions  

I said it on the other thread.

I would do Cribbs and Quinn for Marshall and Scheffler in a heartbeat.

Brandon Marshall may be a d*ck. He may have issues. He also has 3 straight 1,000 yard seasons. He will be 26 next season. He is one of the 5 most physically gifted WR’s in the NFL. Anyone who would pass on him is smoking dope.

Cribbs price tag is probably a late first early second rounder at best.

Brandon Marshall is 25 times more valuable than Cribbs.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 7, 2010 10:28 PM EST reply actions  

“I would do Cribbs and Quinn”

heh.

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Jan 7, 2010 10:45 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s what she said.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 7, 2010 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

No, that’s what you said

by TheRealSlimShady on Jan 8, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Come on really? You think Marshall would succeed here? That’d be like saying Jerry Rice would’ve had the Hall of Fame career he did if Ryan Leaf was throwing him the ball.

We could do better. Settle the QB problem. Hell… Fix the Secondary… You very well can’t expect to win games without a defense.

Then we come to the matter at hand where, most of our wins are because of our SPECIAL TEAMS play. THUS JOSH CRIBBS.

So now we enter a whole new realm of screwed.

I really thought Holmgren was saving this team only to realize that I live in Cleveland and God hates Cleveland sports teams. So again… we’re boned.

by 3PON Nemo on Jan 7, 2010 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Come on really? You think Marshall would succeed here? That’d be like saying Jerry Rice would’ve had the Hall of Fame career he did if Ryan Leaf was throwing him the ball.

You really think the Browns won’t be addressing the QB position in the future? Should we just never acquire WR talent because the QB position sucks? This makes no sense.

We could do better. Settle the QB problem. Hell… Fix the Secondary… You very well can’t expect to win games without a defense.

The post was talking about Brandon Marshall. Nothing else. I don’t see how this has anything to do with the defense.

Then we come to the matter at hand where, most of our wins are because of our SPECIAL TEAMS play. THUS JOSH CRIBBS.

This is wrong on about every level.

I really thought Holmgren was saving this team only to realize that I live in Cleveland and God hates Cleveland sports teams. So again… we’re boned.

Sigh.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 8, 2010 12:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m not saying that we shouldn’t get a good veteran WR. But it does us no good if no one can get him the ball.

Point about the defense was brought up because there are other people that we could go after to better the team as a whole instead of one just player.

Come on, you’re gonna tell me that Josh Cribbs’ play on Special Teams didn’t do more for the offense, and occasionally defense, than more than 80% of the team. Really? Other than Harrison suprising everyone in the last half of the season, was anyone else on the team more consistant?

by 3PON Nemo on Jan 8, 2010 1:24 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree with you on that last point. The special teams won us games. We had the best special teams core in the league. If that special teams was on the saints, they would have gond 16-0 without breaking a sweat. i guess he didn’t watch how many of the times we downed the ball inside the 10, most of them with the help of cribbs (although mike adams was good in that field as well). Without cribbs we would have won probably at least a couple less games… I agree.
 WIns:

Buffalo: He had a 31 yd run to set up the first of two field goals. his good returns were instrumental in a game of field position

Pittsburgh: Led the team in rush yds including a long one to set up Jennings’ TD. Had a long punt return to set up a FG

KC: No need for an explanation here.

Oakland: the only game where he didn’t have an impact. he did however down a punt inside the 5 (which he seemed to help with at least once a game)

Jacksonville: Had a rushing TD. Had another run to set up a FG

Losses (close ones where he had an impact):

Detroit: receiving TD in close game

Cincy in OT: 205 return yds to help with field position….plus a nice 15 yd run to set up a score

San Diego: 150 return yds, a reception and a 30 yd run to set up a score.

Cribbs was the player who had the most impact on our games this year. in general, when he wasn’t involved in some way, we lost big (except for oakland but they suck).

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 2:47 AM EST up reply actions  

The special teams won us five games.

Fixed.

And that’s probably the ceiling for special teams winning games alone.

by rufio on Jan 8, 2010 3:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I dunno if that is fixed…and yes it is probably the ceiling but we still had one of the 3 worst defenses and offenses…even though we had a few good games against horrible defenses.

special teams maybe only won us 4 games…oakland was a team effort. special teams might have not won us jacksonville either, but cribbs did. when we won a game by 6 and he had a TD and a clutch big run to set up a FG, we probably wouldn’t have won it without him

Pittsburgh, we probably wouldn’t have won it without him. he had a 55 yd punt return and a 30 yard run, both got us in the red zone for easy scores.

buffalo, we got lucky anyways…. KC, even with harrison’s performance, because our D was so bad, we still wouldve lost it without cribbs.

really, my point was we would be probably a 1-2 win team without the many things cribbs did for us this year. it was not about special teams in general but how cribbs contributes in every area and the games where he didn’t get good returns and didn’t produce on the offensive side of the ball, were some of our worst losses. Yes, the whole team was playing better when he got more offensive touches but at the same time, he was a very big factor in the turnaround

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 4:00 AM EST up reply actions  

yes, cribbs helped us win games. but you’re saying he is the reason we won 4 games? so one player, a special teams player, single-handedly won a quarter of our games for us? i love cribbs, but i don’t know that i’m comfortable crediting him with 4 wins. he helped a great deal, but who can say we wouldn’t have won in other ways, with other plays, if he wasn’t here? kc is the only game that he came close to winning by himself, and even with that you have to credit some of it to good overall kick return blocking.

also, i wouldn’t mind seeing some actual stats on him downing punts inside the 10 rather than people saying “it seems like he did it every game.”
 
I love josh cribbs and would be sick if we lost him. but being realistic, i don’t think it would mean the collapse of our team.

by Dawg Nuts on Jan 8, 2010 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Then why would we have to fix the QB position if one guys isnt winning games for us then how is it that one guy is losing games for us.

For the what 5 past years so he has been the MVP of the offense coming from the Special teams position.

And for all the people that dont think teams wont give up a first round pick for Cribbs remember that the Dolphins took Ted Ginn with the 9th pick in the 08 draft and that was pretty much based soley on his returner skills.

But i would hate to say it, if the Browns do not right this and give Cribbs what he want i hope he goes to Cincy, Pitt, or Baltimore so we face him twice a year and he burns us cause we will have deserved it. He is the only player that has been consistently good

by franklinbrownie41 on Jan 8, 2010 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

1. not even close to our offensive MVP for th past 5 years; special teams MVP, absolutely.

2. why would you want him to go somewhere and beat us; that makes no sense as a fan and smells of picking player over team. i love josh cribbs, but i’m a browns fan – not a josh cribbs fan.

by Dawg Nuts on Jan 8, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Let me just throw this out there (I’ve said it about 10 times before, sorry if I’m sounding like a broken record): Josh Cribbs played on a team that was at the bottom of the league in offense, bottom in defense, top in special teams. All of this makes sense. Normally, when you’re punting the ball or getting the ball kicked off to you every 3 minutes or something because of offense and defense, your special teams are going to have the OPPORTUNITY to shine. When you can only gain yardage by putting the ball in Josh Cribbs’ hands, of course he’s going to be one of our best players.

However, here is why Joshua Cribbs is not worth as much to the Browns NOW as alot of people think he is: Good teams move the ball by passing and rushing. No one goes to the playoffs on special teams play/wildcat play alone. Mike Holmgren will be working towards building a good playoff team (sure, that’s everyone’s goal, but he has done it before and I’d say he knows what he’s doing). Therefore, eventually we won’t be surviving on special teams play/wildcat play alone (hopefully that happens next year, but if not we should definitely be there before his 3 year contract is up).

Last year is last year. If we’re going to decide to live in the past, then let’s trade in our Browns jerseys and ignore the fact that the Steelers sucked it up this year. Instead, we can talk about how the Steelers have won the Super Bowl before, because that somehow makes up for the fact that they suck.

As it stands, I would rather pay Cribbs for what he will be accomplishing, not what he has accomplished. If we can get more value out of him because someone else wants to overpay him, then fine. Let’s do it.

by shep615 on Jan 8, 2010 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

That is… Let’s trade in our Browns jerseys for Steelers jerseys and ignore the fact that the Steelers sucked it up this year.

by shep615 on Jan 8, 2010 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I understand teams win with offense and defense but when you are a playoff team and you suffer from bad field position because you are bottom 5 in KR average (about 20 yds), the worst punt return team and give up the most punt return yds per return, wouldn’t a great special teamer put you over the top? very possibly. the team i just described are the new orleans saints. they start off with very bad field postition but still manage to do well. they literally average about 4 yds per punt return while giving up 15. cribbs not only is one of the best punt returners but one of the best gunners in the league. right away he can bring their PR average to about 11 and their opponenets to about 10 or less. that is about a 15 yard swing in field position.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you and I might be saying the same thing. He would probably have value to other teams, and at first I thought there was no way we would get a 1st rounder for him, but I’ve been reading some of your stuff and I think there’s a slight possibility.

What I’m saying is if Cribbs is worth more to some other team than he is to us and we can get good value for him, then let’s do it. As of right now, I think he’s just a special team player to us. If we pay him $3 mill, then we’re paying $3 mill for a special teams player. If he could put Indy or NO over the top for a super bowl, then they’d have to give up draft pick and/or player and give him $3 mill. At that point they’re giving $3 mill and draft pick/player for a Super Bowl and a special teams player. I’d do that deal in a heartbeat on both ends.

by shep615 on Jan 8, 2010 2:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree. I love cribbs but right now we are in rebuilding. Yeah, it makes sense for those teams. elite teams use their first round pick often on project type players anyways/backups (successors). It honestly makes sense, especially if NO makes it far. they averaged less than 5 yards per punt return while giving up almost 15. cribbs can help lower that 15 down with his play at gunner and he can keep punts out of the end zone (which also happened a fair amount). he can also give them at least another 6-7 yds per return on punts AND kickoffs. in a game of inches, that is more valuable then many teams realize…

the first rounder is a luxury pick of sorts for them. the redskins used a pick on desmond howard b/c he was a luxury.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

again, as i mentioned earlier, i’d like to see stats to back up that cribbs kept balls out of the end zone “a fair amount.” i know he did it some, but can you show me that he did it an extraordinary amount of times compared to anyone else in the league, or on our team for that matter?

either way, it doesn’t do much to make him irreplaceable.

by Dawg Nuts on Jan 8, 2010 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think there is a stat out there. I know that out of the 8 games I saw that he did it about 6 or 7 times. He is also one of the best gunners in the league (along with mike adams who also helps a lot with downing the ball). It is a fact that we were one of the best (if not the best) team in downing punts inside the 20. cribbs was a large part of that.

I did not say he was irreplacable, what I was saying is that for a good team with bad special teams play that considers a late first round pick somewhat of a luxury, I can see from the GM’s perspective wanting to maybe trade for cribbs. I was not calling him irreplacable. one guy probably couldn’t do all the things he does but besides returning, none are amazing. my point was that a good team with bad special teams, like New Orleans i think would definitely consider possibly trading a first round pick for him.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

respectfully, i think you’re nuts to think teams consider 1st round picks as “screw it, let’s give this a whirl” type picks. just because they’re already good doesn’t mean they don’t want to get better, and drafting a special teams first guy in the 1st round doen’t do that for you.

at no point have i meant to say cribbs isn’t awesome, he is and i would hate to lose him; also, i appreciate how strong you are in your opinion on this; i just couldn’t disagree more with it.

by Dawg Nuts on Jan 8, 2010 9:55 PM EST up reply actions  

okay. i understand how you disagree with me. I am not saying it will happen or it will be a possibility but i do see how they can look at him on film (in all areas) and want to consider it…maybe not with their first round pick but with their second. supposedly mangini was talking to teams at the deadline about cribbs and he was asking for a second…it was intriguing even then and he poured it on in the second half. a mid second for him isn’t out of the question completely.

I am not saying this WILL happen only that it is POSSIBLE.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

and if the saints win the superbowl and address all their needs in free agency, it actually makes sense to go out and fix your most glaring need. they are by far the worst team in punt coverage (giving up 3-4 yards more per return than the second worst) and the worst team in punt returns (worst by a yard and a half or so). when you see it from their eyes, it can make sense, although you think it’s nuts.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 10:49 PM EST up reply actions  

that assumes you know how they actually see it; also, most good teams don’t address all of their needs in free agency. teams that attempt that usually fail. see redskins, washington.

by Dawg Nuts on Jan 9, 2010 10:06 AM EST up reply actions  

I just realize it is somewhat of a logical move trying to get cribbs...plus the management of these teams are smarter than most.

by bross09 on Jan 9, 2010 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I know I have seen him down at least 6-7 punts inside the 10 and i have only watched about half of the games. My point is that we might have won those games, but he was the biggest reason for our success. we definitely would not have won against KC b/c the defense sucked. yes the blocking was good but on one of those touchdowns he just broke like 5 tackles. against buffalo. it was a game of field position and he helped that game with a long return and a couple solid ones. that game was ugly and we only won b/c of good special teams play. oakland he didn’t have a hand in…pittsburgh we might have won without him but that is questionable. same with jacksonville b/c he set up a couple scores. either way, there are 2 games we definitely would not have won without him. another couple where he played a major role.

I know our team would not collapse without him but he is one of the few players that played well and had an impact of some sort on several games.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Dexter McCluster could replace 80% of what Cribbs gave us.

Dexter McCluster could replace 25% of what Marshall brings.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 8, 2010 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

In most grading scales, an 80% is a C.

I’d rather keep an A average thank you.

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 8, 2010 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

You are not adding in what Cribbs would bring in return.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 8, 2010 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

In most grading scales, an 80% is a C.

What the hell kinds of classes are you taking?

by rufio on Jan 11, 2010 3:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Well not in college, I meant on a HS grading scale. Mine was actually laid back as compared to others.

A-100-93, B-92-84, C-83-72, D-71-64, F-63→

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 11, 2010 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

My high school was

A: 100-93, B: 92-85, C: 84-77, D: 76-70, F: 69 and below

by Roger Dorn on Jan 11, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

holy shit, thats rough, at chagrin falls, a pretty decent school, its 100-92 A, 91-80 B, 79-70 C, 69-60 D, <60 F

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jan 11, 2010 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

When they said ‘no child left behind’, they weren’t kidding!

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Jan 11, 2010 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah…I was a shaker grad…godo school and it was 100-90, 89-80, 79-70, 69-60, <60F

I did have a college class that was 100-83 A, 82-68 B 67-53 C 52-40 D <40 F

or something like that. All I remember is that an 83 was an A and a 40 was still a D.

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Private schools….

sigh. (I was in one k-6, leaving at 7th grade was one of the best choices I’ve ever made.)

by Simmsinns on Jan 11, 2010 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess that was my HS grading scale too. Sorry for jumping to conclusions based on your Kent St. affiliations.

by rufio on Jan 11, 2010 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

If we trade Cribbs WR should be last on the list….

"I don’t dance too much." --Mike Holmgren

by johnnyphoenix on Jan 8, 2010 7:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I could not disagree more about Marshall. No way. If we were in a position where he could play the Randy Moss role, maybe. We aren’t. He’d be everything TO was to Dallas and Philly.

No effing way. And that’s coming from the guy who wanted to keep Braylon at the time of the trade.

by rufio on Jan 8, 2010 3:03 AM EST up reply actions  

very true…he is too much of a headcase to deal with right now, especially with our young receivers.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 3:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Brandon Marshall is well worth the risk.

Yes he could blow up in a huge way. He also could be one of the five best WR’s in the NFL. Aren’t we already at Cribbs ceiling?

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 8, 2010 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah. i think he has reached his ceiling and it might be wise to trade him

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Marshall has the talent and measurables to be as good as Andre Johnson.

by Roger Dorn on Jan 8, 2010 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I would not say that at all. the fact is, to be andre johnson caliber and produce like that every year you need elite speed. johnson has elite speed and is great in every category. johnson ran a 4.4 flat at the combine whereas marshall ran a 4.55. another guy in that draft that ran a 4.55 is marques colston. colston is great but he will never be as good as andre johnson either b/c of his speed limitations. at best, brandon marshall could be like terrell owens. both do not have elite speed but are big and go over the middle (but sometimes drop too many balls). both have benefited from the offense. owens has always played with an elite QB. he played with steve young, McNabb, and Romo. Owens was still good but nowhere near as good when garcia was QB. Marshall also will might never bee as good as owens (and marshall benefits from pass first offenses).

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Terrell Owens career > Andre Johnson career thus far

by Roger Dorn on Jan 8, 2010 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

ehhh. debatable. johnson has put up just as good of stats as TO did this point in his career. when you consider the QBs that he had too, it is even more impressive. TO always seemed to have a great QB. plus he dropped a fair amount of passes. Andre Johnson has reliable hands and puts up stats with not as good of QBs and more double coverage. he always gets double coverage whereas when TO emerged, he was not getting covered b/c Rice was getting double covered. technically yes, but in their primes, i would rather take Johnson. he is more reliable and is much more of a team player.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

decent point here.

by Dawg Nuts on Jan 8, 2010 9:56 PM EST up reply actions  

you can make an argument that TO was a system guy who benefited from the west coast offense and good QBs. he was very successful in San Fran, especially when he emerged…at that point, he had steve young throwing to him and jerry rice on the other side. Defenses didn’t care enough to gameplan against him. even when young left, rice was still there and garcia could run the west coast offense. then in philly they ran the west coast with a great QB. in dallas, he struggled at times and although he was in his prime and romo was good, it wasn’t the west coast system. he has been a bust in buffalo…denver too has run a west coast style and these types of receivers thrive in the WC offense. they both have good balance on the sidelines and can leap up and are good at staying in bounds. they both are also good route runners and can run over the middle. the WC offense doesn’t really call for home run hitters so guys like marshall and TO thrive in some ways b/c the system is built for them. rice is not a system guy b/c he was just as successful outside of the WC offense.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Brandon Marshall will NEVER be as good as Andre Johnson.

by Simmsinns on Jan 8, 2010 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed. marshall has always had a passing system in place in denver. he is similar to TO but not even as good. they both have good hands but lose focus and drop balls. they are good open field runners and can run over DBs. that being said, they will never burn a defense and neither one has ever really been a threat to go deep. andre johnson is the prototypical number one receiver who combines good route running with reliable hands, with the speed to burn a defense and make them worry on every play.

by bross09 on Jan 8, 2010 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I mean you are saying that about a guy that has 100 catches in 3 straight years. He is already pretty amazing.

by Roger Dorn on Jan 9, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

he is a system guy. he thrives in a West Coast offense and has always had a good QB…i would not consider david carr or sage rosenfels good QBs. andre johnson can do it all and is dangerous doing just about anything. with marshall, he is also in a pass happy offense and is really the main option and gets a vast majority of targets (scheffler was targeted some in ‘08 but not ’09). with andre johnson, you also have kevin walter who is a marshall type posession receiver. kevin walter is a great number 2 who for the past 3 seasons has averaged 60 catches and almost 800 yards…that is great for a #2. they also have one of the better tight ends in owen daniels who is also a 60 catches 800 yards kinda guy. plus they have always had a decent receiving back. marshall is in a pass happy offense and the main option. johnson is in a very balanced offense and could be used more but doesn’t need to be. that’s like criticizing colston not getting as many catches as he did 2 years ago b/c the offense is more balanced.

by bross09 on Jan 9, 2010 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Even if I agree with your points about who’s a #1 and #2 receiver (i don’t), Andre Johnson saw 171 passes this year while Marshall saw only 154. Marshall may be Denver’s main option, but so is Johnson to Houston. The existence of better 2nd and 3rd options doesn’t mean Johnson gets the ball less; it just may mean Houston’s more successful when they don’t go to Johnson.

you could call Marshall a system guy if he caught 100 balls and fell down 2 yards after the catch. Watching the guy battle after the catch (2nd among WRs in YAC), I’d say he’d work in any offensive system.

You are reading my signature.

by rolub on Jan 11, 2010 10:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I do agree he is good, but all I am saying by that is that his skills are amplified by a west coast system. he also has had goo QBs. if he came to the daboll offense and our QBs he wouldn’t catch nearly 100 balls. I would see 70 as the ceiling, just because of the offense. Denver has always run a more passing offense…

Where do you find these statistics of targets. I believe you, they are just interesting.

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

FootballOutsiders tracks them as “passes”.

Just noticed that ESPN is now, also, as targets. I’m positive this is an in-season development, as it was nearly impossible to find them earlier in the season on the “major” sports websites.

You are reading my signature.

by rolub on Jan 11, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

that is pretty cool…just on a comment comparing AJ to BM (i never noticed those where his initials…) like people were doing. Johnson has twice as many plays of 20 yards or more…plus he has 13 more first downs and they have the same amount of receptions…either way. I think marshall is good but he has benefited from quarterbacks who could get him the ball and an offensive system that got him the ball a lot and utilized his skills. he still would be good with the browns but I don’t think he would get much more than 70 receptions…maybe not even that.

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

i also enjoy looking at the “catch rate” for receivers. in their Football Almanac, i think i read that the average for receivers is 56%… Braylon Edwards’ was 47% this year.

You are reading my signature.

by rolub on Jan 11, 2010 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he was passed to more than it said…maybe they are right and he was passed to less b/c the jets didn’t trust his hands…either way he drops a lot of balls..

interesting though, they say MoMass’ catch rate is about 1/3. yes he isn’t a finished product but he didn’t seem to drop a ton of passes. Quarterbacking play has maybe more of an influence on this stat than WR play.

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

yes, the catch rate isn’t necessarily the inverse of their drop rate. as you mention below, these stats don’t always tell the full story.

You are reading my signature.

by rolub on Jan 11, 2010 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah…its an interesting stat and somewhat useful, but especially in football, a few stats NEVER tell the full story…somehow it said sidney rice was the best receiver in the league (I don’t get that…)

by bross09 on Jan 12, 2010 2:30 AM EST up reply actions  

at the same time, some of the stats on football outsiders do not tell the whole story. they rank AJ’s hands at 59% i think. he catches just about every ball that he can, and has very few drops (especially this year). meachem is ranked higher and so are his hands. i would not consider him better, but i would say he has maybe the most accurate QB in the game in brees. meachem is inflated by their system by his QB. catch rate depends on how good the QB throws it to you. it includes overthrows, underthrows, bad throws, and throws out of bounds. whereas kevin walter has a higher catch rate, AJ is a better WR. walter has maybe slightly better hands but Schaub is also better at getting the ball to walter. walter runs a lot of shorter routes b/c he is more of a posession receiver. on these routes, schaub is one of the best QBs in the league. AJ runs a lot of deeper routes. Schaub’s accuracy is average to below average on deeper routes.

These are interesting stats but I was just pointing out how these sabermetric type of stats do not always tell the full story.

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Always? I seem to remember people like Reuben Droughns and Tatum Bell getting a crapload of yards because they played for Denver… That was back in the day, I will admit. But I seem to remember they had a solid running game, and then once Jay Cutler and Marshall came around I think they started to focus more on the run.

I could be wrong, though. I’m a Browns fan, not a Broncos fan :-)

by shep615 on Jan 12, 2010 1:28 AM EST up reply actions  

It is power rushing to set up the pass…I am pretty sure, for the last 4-5 years they have been in the top 5-10 in passing yards every year. they passed it A LOT. more when elway played but they still pass it a significan amount. they got a crapload of yards (the backs) because of the zone blocking scheme. they would just plug a back in and he would get 1,000 yds. they have been a mostly passing team since the terrell davis days…even then, they had elway for most of the time.

Shanahan is a west coast offense guy and is from the walsh coaching tree. he was an offensive guy.

by bross09 on Jan 12, 2010 2:38 AM EST up reply actions  

The runs Denver were using were not called “Power”, and they utilized quickness, agility, and technique, often at the expense of power. They did not use “power rushing”.

by rufio on Jan 13, 2010 1:53 AM EST up reply actions  

true…they had at times bigger backs but agreed, it was a zone blocking scheme which utilized cutback lanes, finding the hole, and agility.

by bross09 on Jan 13, 2010 10:27 AM EST up reply actions  

His talent is off the charts, no question.

We can’t afford that type of guy right now, though. It would kill the team. I think there would be no doubt it would blow up in a huge way. It was completely rosy here in Colorado, and then all of a sudden, he killed their playoff hopes.

Yes, during the last fourish games, we were probably at Cribbs’ ceiling. We are also probably at his character basement, though.

Just not worth the risk, IMO, although the potential reward is off the charts.

by rufio on Jan 11, 2010 3:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Anyone who would pass on him is smoking dope.

Didn’t our boy Cribbs dabble a bit at Kent State?

"I don’t dance too much." --Mike Holmgren

by johnnyphoenix on Jan 8, 2010 6:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Hate to disillusion you, but smoking pot doesn’t make you retarded, you must be thinking of crack.

The sporting gods hate Cleveland, they give us false hopes, then yank it out from under us like a tablecloth.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 9, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Pot does OK by some I suppose….

"I don’t dance too much." --Mike Holmgren

by johnnyphoenix on Jan 10, 2010 1:33 AM EST up reply actions  

If he doesn’t like it in Denver, what makes people think he’s going to like it here? I’m just wondering.

by Simmsinns on Jan 8, 2010 4:20 AM EST reply actions  

Money. Money is why he is throwing a fit every year.

by Roger Dorn on Jan 8, 2010 9:15 AM EST up reply actions  

So throw money at a guy this franchise barely knows, who beat his wife, and intentionally half-assed training camp. But treat Cribbs like shit, because he made the mistake of signing a bad contract. (Is what some people want to happen here?)

by Simmsinns on Jan 8, 2010 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Personally this is how I look at the off the field stuff.

I don’t care unless it effects the player on the field. Sounds weak, and Lord knows that I have taken many shots at Big Ben’s love for ugly chicks, but it’s true.

Unless a players off the field stuff gets them suspended (like a Pac-Man or Marshall) it isn’t a reason to keep a guy off this team.

If a player is equal with another, then I have no issue with it being the tie breaker. But just because Marshall has had off the field issues (and I don’t have a link right now, but a lot of people think that ESPN’s coverage of the Marshall saga was skewed in a major way) it shouldn’t be the reason we don’t want him.

For Marshal, his off the field issues didn’t keep him off the field this year. If we could get him, it would be a huge get for the Browns, even at the expense of Cribbs.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 8, 2010 7:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Legal trouble

According to Orlando-Orange County public records (case 48-2004-MM-012392-O), on Halloween 2004, while a student at UCF, Marshall was arrested in Orlando on charges of assault on a law enforcement officer, refusal to obey, disorderly conduct and resisting an officer.52

On January 1, 2007, Marshall was present at “The Shelter,” a nightclub in Denver, Colorado, along with teammates Javon Walker and Darrent Williams. The trio was attending a birthday party held for and by Denver Nuggets forward Kenyon Martin. As the players were leaving the club in a limousine, Williams was fatally shot in the neck after an unknown assailant opened fire on the vehicle. Willie Clark was later charged with the murder.53 Walker has stated in interviews that the shooter was likely a nightclub patron whose motive was retaliation after being involved in an altercation with Marshall’s cousin earlier that night.54

On March 26, 2007, Marshall was arrested in the Highlands Ranch suburb of Denver on suspicion of domestic violence after his girlfriend reported that following a domestic dispute, Marshall prevented a taxi she was in from leaving his house.55 Charges from the incident were later dismissed on May 25, 2007, after Marshall completed anger management counseling.56

In the early morning of October 22, 2007, Marshall was arrested in the Denver-Aurora metropolitan area at the intersection of 14th and Blake St. for driving under the influence of alcohol.57 A trial was scheduled for September 16, but Marshall instead agreed to a plea bargain four days earlier; he pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of driving while ability impaired.58 He was sentenced to one-year probation and 24 hours of community service.

On June 12, 2008, Marshall was ticketed for an illegal lane change, then found to be without his license and proof of insurance.59 The case was eventually dropped as part of a plea bargain for the October 22, 2007 driving incident involving alcohol.58

According to an article published in the Rocky Mountain News on July 28, 2008, Douglas County deputies fielded “about 11” calls to Marshall’s home since January 2006. The article stated that one call resulted in Marshall being arrested (the March 26, 2007 domestic dispute), and some did not involve him at all.60

A September 17, 2008 article on CompleteColorado.com stated that the solicitor’s office in Fulton County, Georgia filed misdemeanor battery charges on September 10 for an alleged incident on March 4, 2008, in Atlanta, Georgia. Marshall was booked on March 6, then released the next day after posting a $1,000 cash bond.61 The case was assigned to Judge John Mather in Georgia state court.62 On August 14, 2009, a jury in Atlanta found Marshall not guilty.63

On March 1, 2009, Marshall was arrested in Atlanta for disorderly conduct after allegedly being involved in a fight with his fiancee, Michi Nogami-Campbell. Marshall was released on a $300 bond.64 The charges were dropped the following day.65

That’s a bit much for my taste. Just because, to date, he’s only missed one game due to suspension doesn’t mean we should ignore a pattern of behavior that’s sure to lead to further suspensions.

Add to that the number of times he’s been hurt (hip surgery, pcl tear, lacerations to an artery and veins and nerves in his forearm, etc…) and I say he’s a high risk acquisition. No thanks.

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Jan 8, 2010 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Sounds like blind luck that things like this haven’t kept him off the field so far.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Jan 8, 2010 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Sounds like blind luck that things like this haven’t kept him off the field put him behind bars for a significant amount of time so far.

fixed.

by Dawg Nuts on Jan 8, 2010 10:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I know that a lot of people think that PFT is questionable at best.

But give this article on Marshall a read.

I am not defending what Marshall has done in the past. He has done some shady doings, but I really don’t trust ESPN’s reporting. At times they show a real bias.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 9, 2010 12:28 AM EST up reply actions  

I have no problem with the idea that a domestic situation could be the fault of either party, but that only covers some of the near misses with a prison term above. Still sounds like a pattern of stupidity.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Jan 9, 2010 1:48 AM EST up reply actions  

By no means am I saying that Brandon Marshall isn’t a dumbass.

He is just a dumbass that needs to be double covered at all times.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 9, 2010 2:08 AM EST up reply actions  

….or at least driven to the nearest club the Friday before a game.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Jan 9, 2010 11:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I am 85% sure he didn’t beat his wife. I am fairly certain she came forward and said she made it up.

by rufio on Jan 11, 2010 3:14 AM EST up reply actions  

I will admit my main source of information on the subject was OTL, and they were pretty unforgiving of Marshall, but they might have room for some spin in order to create a more interesting story. They were pretty convincing though, and had several people on directly related to the case.

by Simmsinns on Jan 11, 2010 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

OTL is pretty unforgiving in general. they are praising sam keller as a savior to take down ea sports.

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

The point remains that Marshall just has too long a track record of having these sorts of things surround him. I just think that one was false. But then again, how are you in a serious relationship with someone who is trying to falsely report things to the police about you?

If I had to be on him staying out of trouble or getting in to trouble, I’d probably bet on him getting in to trouble.

by rufio on Jan 11, 2010 4:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought Marshall was an FA

by TheRealSlimShady on Jan 8, 2010 4:20 PM EST reply actions  

he’ll be a RFA and can be franchised.

You are reading my signature.

by rolub on Jan 8, 2010 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

So give this guy 10 million dollars but, Cribbs hasn’t earned get 2.5 – 3, what a croc.

by Simmsinns on Jan 8, 2010 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

MArshall is better than Cribbs

by Roger Dorn on Jan 8, 2010 6:02 PM EST up reply actions  

but not neccessarily by $7M

by talonk on Jan 8, 2010 7:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed. He’s not 7 million dollars better.

My main point is that, if we were willing to throw around 10 million like that, what’s the big deal about added 1.3 million to the Cribbs offer.

by Simmsinns on Jan 8, 2010 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

marshal doesnt fit the mangini mold

that will never happen. No chance, marshal is the same attitude of edwards

by SipedUp on Jan 8, 2010 8:36 PM EST reply actions  

How is the Cardinals’ special teams play? Anquan Boldin doesn’t like his contract…

1.) Steve Breaston is a pretty good WR and might do well at #2
2.) JC could mix it up a little bit with Hightower and Wells
3.) Kurt Warner should be set to keel over anyday now due to old age, leaving Leinhart in line to start
4.) Being able to run the wildcat with Cribbs will probably benefit the team much like it has benefited the Browns with Quinn/Anderson under center.

Possibility? I’d like that trade alot.

by shep615 on Jan 9, 2010 12:16 AM EST reply actions  

I said it in the other thread, I don’t trust Boldin’s health.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 9, 2010 12:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah… His health is a bit of a questionmark. I dunno tho… He’s a pretty sick WR. And I mean, it’s not like he’s a pansy or anything, and it’s not like he’s getting injuries from doing dumb stuff like crashing motorcycles and shooting his foot and stuff.

by shep615 on Jan 9, 2010 12:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Bur he fights through it like a champ.

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 9, 2010 12:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Could be worse… He could be a “soldier”…

by shep615 on Jan 9, 2010 12:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Kellen Winslow… Wasn’t he the one that fought through injuries like a soldier or something? Maybe not, but I remember a Browns player getting ripped a new one cause he said something about how he’s a soldier.

by shep615 on Jan 9, 2010 12:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Haha, the “soldier” rant by Kellen Winslow when he was in college was actually about his intent to injure other players, their intent to injure him. He supposedly thought it was war of some kind.

by Simmsinns on Jan 9, 2010 1:31 AM EST up reply actions  

On that note, he is supposedly out for their game this weekend.

But Boldin is tough as hell. That face surgery stuff was nuts.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 9, 2010 12:57 AM EST up reply actions  

he only gets injured when someone breaks his face. he even played through that you just cannot truly stop him

by bross09 on Jan 10, 2010 2:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Wrong.

Boldin has played 16 games in a season twice in his career.

This is his 7th season in the NFL.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 10, 2010 3:06 AM EST up reply actions  

do you like search my comments and try to disprove them. I was making a joke you idiot. I know he has gotten injured once or twice besides that, but he has only missed significant time once. the point is, that he is a physical player and gets banged up a lot b/c of how he plays, but he plays through injuries and does just fine. that is like accusing and MMA fighter for getting hit in the face too much. boldin’s game is going up and getting the ball, and then just fight the defense with his strength. his style of play leads to occasional small injuries but they are mostly freak injuries. he did tear his meniscus in 2004 while making a good play, and then reinjured it in ‘05 but it hasn’t been a problem since.

I never said he had a clean bill of health, i was saying he was tough and does get banged up but plays through it.

by bross09 on Jan 10, 2010 4:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Your sarcasm is weak and anyway you look at it, he disproved you. You’re the idiot.

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 10, 2010 10:05 AM EST up reply actions  

except. 1. I wasn’t being sarcastic.
2. He didn’t really disprove me.
3. I don’t see how I am the idiot.

I was not completely serious. I was making a joke on the fact that he got his face broken and played a couple days later. I am not saying he is invincible. he is not and does get banged up often b/c of how he plays. HOWEVER he is fairly durable and most players that play like him would get hurt more. He is not a brittle player, he is a tough player who sacrifices his body

by bross09 on Jan 10, 2010 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

1.

do you like search my comments and try to disprove them.

The fact that you were actually serious with this comment is childish.

2.

He didn’t really disprove me.

He actually did, regardless of if you were serious of not. You said something, he disproved it. It’s over.

3.

I don’t see how I am the idiot.

The fact that you stooped so low to call him an idiot in the first place makes you the idiot.

Boom.

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 10, 2010 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

The fact that you stooped so low to call him an idiot in the first place makes you the idiot.

You definitely didn’t win any points around here with the reflexive insult, bross…..

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Jan 10, 2010 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t make the reflexive insult. I am done with insults. I am just going to say how specialbrownie criticized me for calling someone an idiot by CALLING ME AN IDIOT…

I was really tempted to insult him but I am not gonna do that.

by bross09 on Jan 10, 2010 6:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I was really tempted to insult him but I am not gonna do that.

Way to passive-aggressive your way around that.

by rufio on Jan 11, 2010 3:18 AM EST up reply actions  

he kinda set himself up…criticizing me for calling someone an idiot then turning around and calling me an idiot…hypocrite much???

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

haha don’t get me started!

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jan 11, 2010 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Roasted.

Hey bross, I like alot of the stuff you bring to DBN, and I agree with alot of it. Fact is, though, not everyone is going to agree with it, and that’s OK. It’s nothing personal, so try not to take it personally. Generally if you bring something intelligent and thought out to the table (which you normally do), people will respect you for it even if they disagree. So just remember… Disagreement is not personal.

Name calling is disrespectful and dumb, though. So don’t do it if you plan to keep the respect of other people here :-)

by shep615 on Jan 10, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree.

In general, people do disrespect my opinion and I do not usually take it personally…Bernie19Kosar was not really respecting me at one point even though he disagreed. I don’t care that much anymore, it is behind me. Both of us were wrong and I regret stooping to name calling.

by bross09 on Jan 10, 2010 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Bernie19Kosar was not really respecting me at one point even though he disagreed.

I wasn’t disrespecting you, I just want you to stop making things up.

Big difference.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 10, 2010 7:33 PM EST up reply actions  

again…you keep accusing me of making things up…it is from ONE post where I couldn’t find an article from several months ago…why does it matter that much to you. I have work to do tonight and have better things to do with my time than put up with you talking about how I am a liar who makes things up…

by bross09 on Jan 10, 2010 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

It was more than one, buddy.

by Buckeye Brad on Jan 10, 2010 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

it was one thread about an article I couldn’t find….yeah, i was lying left and right…

by bross09 on Jan 10, 2010 11:14 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, i make everything up from what the little gremlins in my head tell me. i am also from the planet talstar.

by bross09 on Jan 10, 2010 11:44 PM EST up reply actions  

rec’d

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jan 11, 2010 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

green

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Jan 11, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

no…AND i was being sarcasting about the little gremlins…I hate internet b/c at times I am extremely sarcastic but no one can tell.

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

This is why you use such items as /sarc or [!] at the end of your sarcastic sentence.

Problem solved!

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 11, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

true…i never knew what that /sarc thing was when ppl used it…thank u for the advice

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I think after a very (and I mean very) rough intro, everyone at DBN has warmed up to you. So you’re good.

If I hear "There's always next year" one more time...

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 12, 2010 10:05 PM EST up reply actions  

we all knew it was sarcasm, it was just difficult to miss that opportunity for a joke.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jan 12, 2010 9:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I never said you were lying left and right, but there is more than once instance where you said something which another poster showed was incorrect.

by Buckeye Brad on Jan 10, 2010 11:26 PM EST up reply actions  

when…there was the one instance where I couldn’t find and article then another time when I made a comparison the person didn’t get…oh yeah, i accidentally said Justin Smith was an OLB instead of a DE…with that, people are prone to mistakes. i made a mistake, does that make me a liar…does anyone who makes a mistake become a liar?

by bross09 on Jan 10, 2010 11:43 PM EST up reply actions  

1. actually. bernie19kosar was going writing on OPINION comments that I had and saying “false” “untrue” and “you are an idiot”. I honestly want to bury the hatchet…

2. You really though I was serious?? Yes he disproved a joke. a joke is not reality. he disproved something not rooted in reality…good for him…i can disprove things not rooted in reality all the time…its not a major feat.

3. I admit I shouldn’t have called him an idiot. I dunno, some of the comments he had made to me felt rude, I took it too personal and that was dumb…

4. wait, by doing that didn’t you just call me an idiot???

BOOM!!! I am done with name calling but you call me an idiot for calling him an idiot.

pot calling the kettle black!!

by bross09 on Jan 10, 2010 6:50 PM EST up reply actions  

actually. bernie19kosar was going writing on OPINION comments that I had and saying "false" "untrue" and "you are an idiot".

I never once called you an idiot. I only say “false” when you make things up, like me calling you an idiot.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 10, 2010 7:35 PM EST up reply actions  

lol…I don’t remember the exact post and I am not going to search through 1,000 posts for it but you did call me an idiot once.

you said my opinions are false. you have every right to agree with them but opinions are not false. if something is false, it is not an opinion. I was expressing my opinion and you were saying that was false.

I never made anything up…

by bross09 on Jan 10, 2010 8:18 PM EST up reply actions  

do you like search my comments and try to disprove them.

You just say a lot of disprovable stuff. If you were correct, no one could say anything.

by rufio on Jan 11, 2010 3:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t say a ton of disprovable stuff. sometimes he comes in and finds an opinion I have on a player and just say it is false…but whatever, you can believe I am dumb and say a lot of stupid stuff…It is your perogative.

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

It has nothing to do with your intelligence level or the value of your opinion.

It has everything to do with things you state as though they were fact that are not true.

by rufio on Jan 11, 2010 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

at the same time…he was saying opinions i had were untrue. I was not stating them as facts but as opinions…either way, it doesn’t really matter.

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

leaving Leinhart in line to start

Poor, Arizona. Wait, they were just in a Superbowl, they deserve some years of sucking. HAHA!

by Simmsinns on Jan 9, 2010 1:29 AM EST up reply actions  

If we are looking to trade…after watching the Packers yesterday, I feel like they could use a guy like Cribbs. They have Ahman Green returning kicks & Jordie Nelson uncomfortably returning punts, they are in need for an upgrade & the fans would love him at Lambeau…We would move him to the NFC this way too.

Maybe we can get someone off their D Line. They seem a little heavy at D-line(pardon the pun) with john jolly, raji, picket, jenkens….we could use some depth there

…or maybe it would just be another corey williams…

by strongsafety on Jan 11, 2010 9:31 AM EST reply actions  

We could use a guy like Aaron Rodgers.

We took BE instead. I’m gonna go get wasted now.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 11, 2010 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

good Idea…thinking about that makes me so upset.

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I doubt AR develops in to half the QB he is now if we draft him in 05.

by rufio on Jan 11, 2010 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, but half of Aaron Rodgers is 10x better than what we have now.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 11, 2010 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair. Probably true even in terms of passer rating when compared to DA.

by rufio on Jan 13, 2010 1:54 AM EST up reply actions  

true, they are one of the worst return teams.

by bross09 on Jan 11, 2010 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Funny-good-times-11_small
DBN Draft Talk Thread #2

Recent FanPosts

Ike_small
2014 Super Bowl Cleveland Browns vs. Detroit Lions.....
Audi_rs4_fullsize_small
A new, improved top 10 to shred.
Nfl_cleveland_browns_1_small
Pick Griffin at 4 or BPA or Trade down
01203_rosewoodcanvas_1680x1050_small
The Day After
01anderson_500_display_image_small
How much longer for our Browns to play in and win a Superbowl?
Small
Are you All In???
01203_rosewoodcanvas_1680x1050_small
If I Were Tom Heckert...
Small
The Manning Saga (Lets make a Deal!)
Audi_rs4_fullsize_small
My bottom five: '11 Browns starters.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

You get 'em Betty. Hat tip to BELIEVELAND.
Browns Are the Best in NFL History!

Recent FanShots

Eric Metcalf and Phil Taylor are coming to the Photo City Browns Backers BrownsFest on April 21st. ...
What Would the End of Football Look Like?
Peyton Manning's face in every logo
The First Super Bowl
Jordan Norwood weighs in on the Browns Unis: @jordaNorwood from a...
Dan Wolf Latest Mock
Cleveland to host Super Bowl?
Top Ten Things Overheard In The New England Patriots Locker Room After The Super Bowl (cut from tonight's "Late Show")
I think that you guys will all enjoy this as much as I did.
@dmdxu: "@darrenrovell SB cookie cake being sold at Giant Eagle in Cleveland (via @fisherbw) twitpic.com/8g4zdz"

This is an awesome Browns related Super Bowl cake!

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Evilbrownsavatar1_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

Jared_sullinger--300x450_small Buckeye Brad

Small notthatnoise