Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Could Cleveland Failure Be Linked To Medical Failures?

Since the return of the Browns to professional football in the late 90's, consistency has not been a luxury. Whether the topic is stability, coaching presence, or even something as simple as having a quarterback that can start an entire season, fans and sports professionals alike can all agree that the word consistent has not been in the lexicon of the franchise.

Oh, except one word: Injuries.

Star-divide

Injuries have been a word on the tip of everyone's tongue as of late, thanks to some rough play and large fines thrown down by league officials. I'm not here to talk about any situation involving helmet to helmet or how much of a jerk hard playing NFL defensive men may or may not be. I have one thing specifically in mind: Could the problems faced by the Browns year after year be caused by a complete lack of competency on part of the medical staff?

Let us look at the facts.

Looking back at the injury tally for the last ten years, one can obviously see that Cleveland has been affected by the injury bug like it was an infestation. Just this year alone, Cleveland has had over 100 listings to their injury report (105 according to the Sports Illustrated injury report). Additionally, I am sure I don't have to remind any Browns fan of the year after year groaning that comes along with the injury report. Point in fact, I consider the preseason to be nothing more than a wait and see in terms of injuries. I've even changed my outlook on upcoming seasons based purely off of injuries or a lack-there-of in preseason.

Injuries themselves during a season is not the only problem to take into account. the medical facilities with the Browns must also be called into question with the reoccurring problem over the last five years of staph and MRSA infections. Evidence can be drawn that the majority of these staph infections have to be nosocomial (aka, infections picked up from the facility in question), and thus preventable with proper care. Look into the cases of Braylon Edwards, Kellen Winslow, Brian Russell, and more recently the court case initiated by LeCharles Bentley wherein a lawsuit is being slapped against the medical facilities.

Interesting side note to the Bentley case, on a recent radio segment on ESPN 850 WKNR, Bentley was confronted by a call-in fan about his continuing to work and be affiliated with the Browns despite the lawsuit. Bentley quickly cut the caller off and dismissed the claim, all the while telling the caller (and anyone else) to "come talk to him in person about it", in what could only be viewed as an attempt to avoid the hypocrisy.

Are the medical facilities at fault? Could the problems of the Browns be turned around with better health care? One could assume that the idea couldn't hurt, as year in and year out Cleveland is one of the most, if not the most injury ridden teams in the league. Certainly, that issue has arisen this year already.

Through the quarterback changes, coaching changes, personnel changes, and anything else that has been swapped, switched, or modified, one thing has stayed almost the same. Could a change in the medical protocol be the answer? I would say yes.

Poll
Are frequent injuries to blame for the Browns problems this year?
Yes
18 votes
No
25 votes
Uh...Go Steelers?
4 votes

47 votes | Poll has closed

This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Valid point. This is also very much the case with the Buffalo Bills (a more local team to me, so i get their news). The injuries take on year after year are ABSOLUTELY astounding. Their traning staff should seriously all be fired.

Could the situation in Cleveland be similar?
Possibly.

I would agree that there seem to be many “higher- caliber” teams that don’t struggle with repeated cycle of injury as do some others.

by discoinferno083 on Oct 21, 2010 10:32 PM EDT reply actions  

I like this post alot. Winslow’s injury was his fibula, bentley and edwards had knee injuries, russel had an elbow injury. I do have to ask, with a better med. staff, could these injuries could have been prevented? I believe Bentley’s lawsuit came after the browns released him, but no team would sign him. That brings up a good point to your argument. IMO lack of talent, bad drafts, and constant coaching changes are the root of the problem. However, poor medical staffing just adds to our suffering.

by browns8 on Oct 22, 2010 12:38 AM EDT reply actions  

I think the crazy staph infection problems were one reason that our medical staff might be less than superior. However, with all the credit the Cleveland Clinic gets, you would think this wouldn’t be the case. If you have one of the best hospitals in your town, you would think the medical staff would be top notch.

 At least there hasn’t been any outbreaks of staph recently.

I know injuries are part of the game, but it’s quite possible the medical staff isn’t doing their best to prevent and treat them.

There's a new sheriff in town, his name's McCoy

by da36chamberz on Oct 22, 2010 4:05 AM EDT reply actions  

maybe we aren’t preventing them well enough. I would say that burden may lay more with the training staff than with the actual doctors at the clinic.

this could also be a byproduct of having a lot of older players too…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Oct 22, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Staph should not be an issue anymore. One of the things Mangini had done was the entire team medical facility totally gutted and renovated to stop the spread of Staph infections. However I do think injuries get compounded with bad attitudes a lot. Some of the more frequently injured also seem to be some of the more disgruntled players. Maybe I’m wrong, but I’m just saying. Could it be that the player motivation in Cleveland and Buffalo is so low that folks just are not playing through the pain or risking their career for, in their mind, a lesser team?

by browndawgbacker on Oct 22, 2010 9:31 AM EDT reply actions  

you’d have to give examples. At least for Buffalo, that’s not the issue. Paul Paozluski is a solid player. He has a glass arm.

I would think that a wise player would still want to play to earn money, if not the potential to get traded/released to another team.

a bad attitude is one thing. But i don’t see how it would correlate to injury, unless they just give up.

But i’m viewing a repeated cycle of injuries- the same player getting hurt or re-hurt several times. Which, by it’s nature suggests the player isn’t giving up.

by discoinferno083 on Oct 22, 2010 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would have to see our number of injuries and such compared to other teams to be convinced of this.

"Of course, I can get a hell of a good look at a T-Bone steak by sticking my head up a bull's ass, but I'd rather take the butcher's word for it."--Big Tom Callahan

by Kimble_79 on Oct 22, 2010 9:40 AM EDT reply actions  

Dude.

Winslow, Bentley, and Jurevicious all had staph that effectively ended their careers in Cleveland (Winslow might of lasted one more yeat though) . I’m sure there are more but that’s all I need to know.

Peyton Hillis is my Hero.

by SpecialBrownie on Oct 22, 2010 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just this year alone, Cleveland has had over 100 listings to their injury report (105 according to the Sports Illustrated injury report).

I know that, they indeed have a staph infection problem. I’m talking more about what is blocked above. These have nothing to do with staph infection.

"Of course, I can get a hell of a good look at a T-Bone steak by sticking my head up a bull's ass, but I'd rather take the butcher's word for it."--Big Tom Callahan

by Kimble_79 on Oct 22, 2010 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

this number seemed ridiculously high.

and we all know the injury report is not sufficient enough to go by.
You’d have to break it down.

by discoinferno083 on Oct 22, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ditto. A team by team comparison of number of injuries would make for interesting reading.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Oct 22, 2010 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

If I had to guess, I’d say we’ve had roughly the same number of injuries as other teams.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Oct 22, 2010 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Probably, and I think any differences can really only be accounted for by pure coincidence.

"Of course, I can get a hell of a good look at a T-Bone steak by sticking my head up a bull's ass, but I'd rather take the butcher's word for it."--Big Tom Callahan

by Kimble_79 on Oct 22, 2010 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Given that we have to play the Steelers twice a year, it is possible we may have more than other teams.

"If Brown is the answer, then you’re asking the wrong question." - Ryan

by woodsmeister on Oct 22, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even if the overall number of injuries is similar to other team, though, the fact that we’ve lost both of our top quarterbacks to injury puts us at a severe disadvantage.

by bbstirrd on Oct 22, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

this is a good point. amount of injuries may be the same, but the importance of those injuries should not be discounted.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Oct 23, 2010 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I said NO.

A couple injuries from some decent starters may not ruin your season. Now depth becomes a factor. There are many teams that have a starter go do down and then have a backup start rippin’ it up. We don’t really have that capability.
 
I don’t blame the roster, I blame the management.

It’s not a lie if you believe it.

by Brownie's Year on Oct 22, 2010 5:00 PM EDT reply actions  

I wanted to thank everyone for the great comments so far on each side of the ball, so to speak. I actually didn’t get the piece as refined as I wanted, as I was at work on a keyboard missing a shift key (of course, lol).

I wanted to hit a few things to follow up on some of your posts, for the sake of thoroughness.

The number I cited from SI was actually the individual reports per injury since preseason. So, anything that was reported to the NFL popped up on the list. This may account for the number being so high. As to comparison to other teams, I briefly looked and took the mean average of five random teams and compared. The browns were at least 20% higher in terms of the number of reports. I would love to go more in depth than that, and originally I was going to tally and average the injuries by season since the expansion year, but I just couldn’t find what I was looking for.

I would agree that another part of the problem I didn’t mention was the training staff, but that’s only because I didn’t consider them to be different. On most teams, the training staff is hired as medical, almost like a physical therapy department in a hospital. I’ve thought for over a decade that poor conditioning was a key problem for the browns (especially during the Crennel era).

As for recently, I feel like an inability to keep the players out of harm post injury has been a problem. I think we can all admit that Cleveland’s team outside of the first team offense and defense is rather poor (or at least pre-season alluded to that). So, I’m not surprised that a few key injuries here and there (most notably in the offensive and defensive lines) can cause quite a few problems when the backups just aren’t calibur players.

The point I wanted to hit on was that these injuries are a reoccurring event, year after year. I cannot think of a single season since 2001 where I didn’t see a Browns headline making a pun on their injury woes. Is there a quick fix? No. Cleveland fired their head physician back in spring of 2009. Whether this was linked to the staph problem is hard to see.

I remain an optimist however, much like the rest of Cleveland. What else do we have?

by wh116508 on Oct 22, 2010 5:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / @# / !@
Small
Top 5 Bubble Players
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Buddhathomas_small
Cleveland Browns 2012 Prediction - A Sailor's Perspective
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / !^ / !@
Cribbs_small
2012 Rookie Predictions
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
A look of the 2012 Browns O-line
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / ( / !@
00000021_small
browns Q for 12 who are they
Gray_cat_thinking_small
That time of year again.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Hadenward-new2_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

N3tdgy_medium_small Brownie's Year

Polar_cap_of_mars_planet_small notthatnoise