Around the Pound (2/15): Browns Special Teams Unit Dominates the League
It's been a full week since the Super Bowl as teams are pretty much in full offseason discussion now. In today's Presidents Day Edition of Around the Pound, we primarily take a look at the Dallas Morning News' special teams rankings from the 2009-2010 campaign.
Browns Rank First on Special Teams
In rankings compiled by the Dallas Morning News, the Cleveland Browns ranked first in the NFL on special teams. The way their system works is that they have a total of 22 different categories, ranging from kickoff returns all the way down to penalties. The best team in the league in each category receives 1 point, while the worst team in the league receives 32 points. Obviously, the goal is to receive the lowest number of points under this system.
That's exactly what the Browns did. In fact, in comparison, the Browns were even a far cry from second-place finishing Tampa Bay.
| Rk. | Team | Points |
| 1. | Cleveland | 215.5 |
| 2. | Tampa Bay | 256.5 |
| 3. | Buffalo | 274 |
| 4. | Cowboys | 288 |
| 5. | NY Jets | 296.5 |
"You always talk about the hidden yardage on special teams," said Brad Seely, special teams coordinator of the Browns. "But this [season] was a case where the yards weren't so hidden. Our special teams were a factor in games, and everybody could see it."
The Browns finished in sole possession of first place in the following categories:
- Kickoff Coverage: Cleveland, 18.9 yards
- Starting Point: Cleveland, 31.4-yard line
- Points Scored: Cleveland, 24
Now, if only we could get our offense and defense together next season...
Team Needs at Mocking the Draft
Over at Mocking the Draft, there is a post that describes some of the team needs of the Cleveland Browns. The three needs listed are in the following order: running back, cornerback, and tight end. I don't think I agree with that list too much, but feel free to head on over there and check it out.
1. Running Back
- Jerome Harrison finished off the season strong but is he really the long term answer at the position? The Browns have some need at the receiver position but they need to let some of their younger players develop so addressing the running back position is a must. Adding a playmaking back will help the quarterback, receivers, and defense. With a strong combine performance CJ Spiller could be their pick in round 1. If not look at maybe Jonathan Dwyer and Ryan Matthews in round 2.
Donte Stallworth Updates
Who wants WR Donte Stallworth? After he was released by the Browns, the initial teams interested were reportedly the Cincinnati Bengals (really? ;)) and the Detroit Lions. Since those initial rumors though, it appears as though the Bengals have pulled out and that the Lions are the only team that might be trying to acquire Stallworth.
Off-Beat Notes
- Some LOST fans are complaining about the fact that they felt last week's episode was horrible because it seemed like "filler" and they want "answers." As far as I'm concerned, if all people want every episode is answers, answers, answers, then they need to forget watching the rest of the season and just read about them online after the season is over to see all the answers they want. I think the true LOST fans still appreciate the fact that a story is still attempting to be told in the final season rather than a "let's dump the answer bank all at once just for the hell of it."
- I'm sure all of you have seen the new Facebook Connect feature. If you haven't already read about the features associated with it, then check them out here: New Facebook Connect Features. A few of you also mentioned your concerns regarding one of the advertisements seen on SB Nation. Please be assured that the upper management has heard your concerns.
- Now that Batman 3 is supposedly in its beginning stages, I'll be very curious to hear who the main villain(s) will be. Will it be a redux like in the Dark Knight, or more of a fresh face as in Batman Begins? Either way, considering the hype that was around Heath Ledger's portrayal of the Joker, it'll be darn-near impossible for the franchise to top their second flick.
38 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m thinking of a Penguin or Riddler cameo.
If I hear "There's always next year" one more time...
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 15, 2010 11:30 AM EST reply actions
that was the rumor a year or two ago, with the possibility of phillip seymour hoffman as the penguin.
I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.
by notthatnoise on Feb 15, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions
i addition to this mocking the draft info, i saw something on sportscenter this afternoon that mel kiper listed our top 2 draft needs as WR and OLB. don’t any of the “experts” see the need at DB that we do? i don’t know how people who claim to know NFL football can’t see that as one of our top 2 needs.
I don’t know how you can ignore our needs at Safety.
My top needs (from this thread) remain:
1. S
2. ILB
3. RB
4. WR
Drafting a corner or speed rusher or RT or even QB is all possible- but it would just have to be the perfect situation of a guy falling and the FO thinking they are great fits. To the extent you draft on need at all, I’d go with those 4 positions as our top priorities.
fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com
In the already evolving future:
1. Abe Elam, plus unnamed prospect from 2009 of the rover variety.
2. Needs filled by two unnamed prospects from 2009.
3. 4 Ground Hounds are on short order.
4. Unless that WR is a Freaky Flanker, Mohamed Massaquoi has a job to lose.
…5. Check Stuart Schweigert and Curtis Taylor as veterans, and Terrell Skinner, Justin Woodall and Dekoda Watson…6. Retain Matt Roth and Jason Trusnik if you must, our base alignment however is the 3-4…7. The only QB´s I deem possible are Jimmy Clausen, Kevin Craft and as a temporary fix Pike…8. We draft wants.
Dekoda Watson in a 3-4? How?
Oh wait, its moon.
Scientific research has proven that you lose exactly 5.37 billion brain cells every time you listen to Todd McShay.
by TheRealSlimShady on Feb 16, 2010 11:24 PM EST up reply actions
I was gonna ask why Trusnik and Roth don’t fit… But…
And who are all those guys listed in point 5? I’ve never heard of any of them.
by Legoman0721 on Feb 17, 2010 3:04 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Roth and Trusnik are heavy and to slow to play linebacker. I would utilize them as situational pass rushers (outside) or line busters (inside).
by mooncamping on Feb 17, 2010 11:27 AM EST up reply actions
Dekoda Watson will convert to corner back.
by mooncamping on Feb 17, 2010 11:25 AM EST up reply actions
don’t any of the "experts" see the need at DB that we do?
Since they’re experts you think they would, wouldn’t you?
These experts don’t get paid because they are right. They get paid because people listen. They are experts at being heard… And it is a lot easier to be heard when talking about glamour positions like RB & OLB.
On top of all of this, these guys are relying on info from all sources, including agents, who are experts at spinning stories and making it easier for the talking heads to sound purdy.
In the end, I think all of the correct and incorrect stories and all of the information and misinformation are good for the Browns.
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin
by Spidey on Feb 16, 2010 10:23 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
It’s great that the Browns ranked first in special teams but I think the fact that the Colts and Saints were ranked 28th and 29th, respectively, shows the importance of special teams to the success of a football team. Obviously it’s better to have great special teams as opposed to bad but until we improve our offense and defense it’s not going to mean very much.
by Buckeye Brad on Feb 15, 2010 5:25 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
Yeah, awhile back I argued that ST were very important and damn near as important as offense and defense.
Whoever that discussion was with, my bad.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 15, 2010 11:47 PM EST up reply actions
I was on this side too. I still think it is damn near as important. But even if it is worth 1/3 of the game, it is easy to see why we sucked. #1 in 1/3 of the game. #30 in 2/3 of the game. #22 overall.
fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com
Right. Simply put, you can be great enough on offense and/or defense to overcome ineffectiveness on special teams, but not the other way around.
You are reading my signature.
by rolub on Feb 16, 2010 10:06 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I take credit for being on the opposing side.
Scientific research has proven that you lose exactly 5.37 billion brain cells every time you listen to Todd McShay.
by TheRealSlimShady on Feb 16, 2010 11:25 PM EST up reply actions
Off-topic, but definitely around the pound, who had the franchise tag on the team last season?
Probably the only Cleveland Browns fan in all of Sydney, NSW.
I don’t recall the Browns using the franchise tag on anyone in years, if at all.
Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.
by Chris Pokorny on Feb 15, 2010 6:54 PM EST up reply actions
Ah alright. Was just reading the Julius Peppers thing and I couldn’t think of anyone who had the tag on our team.
Didn’t know it wasn’t compulsory.
Probably the only Cleveland Browns fan in all of Sydney, NSW.
$10 says they use it the minute JT’s contract hits free agency.
If I hear "There's always next year" one more time...
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 15, 2010 9:53 PM EST up reply actions
Just as the topic affects nearly every other discussion, what role will the impending lockout play in to the draft choice? What positions would be hurt in the development process if they take a season off in 2011?
Probably not a big deal, but I may not want a RB if we lose out on one of his prime seasons.
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin
by Spidey on Feb 16, 2010 12:55 PM EST via mobile reply actions
On the semi-subject of the facebook connect features, does DBN have a twitter account for story/fanshot/fanpost notifications? Let’s Go Tribe has one that tweets when new articles are posted only, which is a helpful reminder to go check out the site. I looked around for something similar with DBN but don’t see anything.
You are reading my signature.
I will get to work on implementing one. I think I posted a message when SBN first launched the feature and not many people gave it support, but its certainly good to have it if somebody will use it!
Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.
by Chris Pokorny on Feb 17, 2010 1:12 PM EST up reply actions
i say if berry doesnt fall to us, which i dont see happening, if iether one of the QB’s are still there, we find a team to trade down with and maybe take a chance on the youngster E.T.(maybe he will phone home for us!) from texas and pick up some extra players or picks. I would still not count out Hughes either. I also heard Kao Misi from Utah is a sleeper at linbacker in the middle rounds to look at. from what i heard he showed a lot of promise during the senior bowl, i would litterally poop my pants if brandon graham slips into the 2nd, i dont see it happening, but he really showed his stuff at the senior bowl!
Lifes A Dance, You Learn As You Go!
by findlaybrownslover on Feb 16, 2010 5:30 PM EST reply actions
I agree with everything here besides taking Hughes.
Scientific research has proven that you lose exactly 5.37 billion brain cells every time you listen to Todd McShay.
by TheRealSlimShady on Feb 16, 2010 11:26 PM EST up reply actions

by 

















