Jake Delhomme's Introduction Presser With the Browns (Recap)
Cleveland Browns quarterback Jake Delhomme met with the Cleveland media for the first time since signing with the team recently. The money we're paying Delhomme makes it appear as though he will start ahead of Seneca Wallace, but the starting job was never guaranteed in the process of luring Delhomme to Cleveland. The full transcript can be read here; a recap with my select comments are below.
(On why he didn’t go to New Orleans)- “We set up two visits basically. There were two areas that I wanted to go to, one was here and one was New Orleans. We had a bunch of other teams call and what not. I waited a little bit to make my trip because I wanted to let the, I guess, sting of the release get out and let the emotion kind of get out of it and try to write down all of the different scenarios. What might work, what might not work. I came here on my visit, I had a great time. Actually, I was at the airport headed to New Orleans, but the weather the Atlanta, that’s where I was connecting through. It kept getting delayed, delayed, delayed so I ended up getting a flight back to Charlotte that afternoon and I was going to head to New Orleans on Sunday evening and visit there Sunday and Monday.”
(On what changed his mind about not going to New Orleans)- “I had an opportunity to compete over here. I kind of knew what my role would be in New Orleans. I didn’t think there’s any doubt. I’m good friend with Drew (Brees). I’ve known Sean (Payton) for many years. I’m very comfortable with that organization, naturally, playing there for six years. It’s two hours from my home. I had to decide if I still wanted to still try to compete or if I wanted to hold a clipboard. I wasn’t ready for that. I just wasn’t ready for that plan and simple. I wanted to have a chance to come in to compete and play.
Comments: Sure, for sentimental reasons, I'm sure he would've loved to have gone back to New Orleans again. But, the delay in flights allowed Delhomme to remember that one of the only teams in the league he could start for, for the money he was being offered, could always withdraw their offer if they so chose to. Honestly, all it may have taken was for Holmgren to pop in some game film of Delhomme last year (I kid, I kid).
(On what happened last year)- “I didn’t play good football. I’m not going to blame anybody else or anything. I didn’t play good football, very simple. For whatever reason, I can sit here and blame this, blame that, but ultimately that doesn’t do anybody any good. I didn’t play good football from Week 1 on. The 2009 year football wise wasn’t fun. From January 10 of 2009 the playoff game through when I broke my finger in the Jets game, I want to say late November. We didn’t have the continuity on offense as we had the year before or as we have had years prior. I probably tried to press too much. I don’t think there’s any doubt I probably tried to do too much and it didn’t work. I wasn’t just being me and that’s something for six out of the seven years that I started there, I was just me. I maybe tried to do a little too much last year and it didn’t work obviously.”
(On if his confidence took a beating last year)- “It probably took a good bit. I’m not going to lie to you. I just wanted to do well. The playoff game was such a downer after such a great season. We go 12-4 and I probably tried to do too much. I don’t think there’s any doubt. I just tried to do too way much and I wasn’t myself. That’s something that over time you should learn from and what not and maybe I should have. You just try to do too much and I keep saying that. You work even harder. You put in more hours and just wasn’t getting the results because you are thinking instead of playing. That’s something that has never worked well for me.”
(On if the playoff loss carried over)- “Obviously it did because I didn’t play well last year. I think I put a lot on myself to try to get us back. I didn’t just try to forget about it and move on.”
(On if he was healthy last year)- “Yes, just didn’t play well.”
Comments: There's really not a whole lot to go off of in terms of why Delhomme struggled compared to previous years, which again leads me to believe a lot of it had to do with Delhomme's confidence mentally. Staying with the same team can't wipe that mental block clean, but a trip to another conference on a team without as high of expectations can help.
(On what he has heard about the Browns)- “Jeff Davidson was my coordinator in Carolina for three years and Jeff was here for four years, I believe. Rip Scherer was my quarterback coach last year. Rip was here for four years, I believe. I guess I kind of had an understanding of the organization, somewhat. Everything they always said was the organization is trying to do things the right way, great people, it’s a great football town and things like that. I’ve been in the NFC my whole career, I’ve been in the NFC South my whole career. I am changing conferences. This is very new to me. I am still learning a little bit of everything.
One thing I wanted to do, I wanted to come on my visit and kind of see what you feel inside. I’ve been around a few years so you see what you feel inside. I think I can kind of read people and what not and I just had a good feeling about a lot of things. I wasn’t kissed up to, so to speak. That was one thing that’s huge to me. I don’t like that kind of stuff. Let’s just talk. What direction we are going? What needs to be done? Coming here and just kind of seeing the pieces they started, signing guys, signing (Tony) Pashos, signing (Scott) Fujita, getting Ben Watson.
A big thing for me was over last weekend and early last week kind of researching. This team started 1-11. You find a lot of team that started 1-11 and those bags are packed in December. Guys are ready to get out. This team won the last four games. I am telling you, that’s something. Something was happening. Something was going in the right direction. That was a main reason I went to Carolina back in ’03. They won four out of their last five or something like that with nothing to play for. It’s a process, coaches leaning players, new coaching staff and things like that. That’s kind of the approach that I took when I came here and just everything kind of felt right.”
Comments: The way we finished certainly is something, because it saved Eric Mangini's job. And, if Delhomme has a comeback-player-of-the-year type of season, he can be the next person to save Mangini's job (as well as his own).
(On what he was told about the opportunity here)- “I was not guaranteed anything. I want to make that perfectly clear. I was guaranteed a chance to compete, very simple. There were no guarantees whatsoever. That’s the honest to god’s truth. I am here to compete and just be me. That’s what I’m here to do.”
Comments: It'll be interesting to see if Wallace ends up starting; I just find it hard to believe Delhomme won't be the guy.
(On if he is ready to mentor a young quarterback)- “Absolutely, whatever I need to do. I was lucky enough I had a couple of older quarterbacks kind of take me under their wing when I was younger. Billy Joe Tolliver was an older quarterback, played 10 years. When Mike McCarthy first came in, Billy was already in New Orleans and he had Mike in Kansas City. Here I am, extremely wet behind the ears trying to learn and he took me under his wing. He really helped me and taught me the system. After we studied all day and what not at the facility learning, we’d go back, Billy and I lived in the same apartment complex, and we’d do more that night. That was always special to me. Ultimately, it cost him a job. I beat him out that year. It cost him a job.
When I went to Carolina, Rodney Peete, the same way. Rodney was the starter and I came in at halftime of the first game and kind of went from there, but my biggest cheerleader was Rodney. (He was) my biggest fan in the film room. It helped and I just think that’s important. I broke my finger last year and I was there for Matt Moore. That’s what I believe in. I’m sorry. That’s what I believe in and I was proud of Matt. Matt went in and did an outstanding job. If a young quarterback comes here, one, we have coaches but, two, I going to try to show him the right way, what I was taught was the right way. That’s a legacy that you pass on. To me, that’s important. That’s something that’s special especially if you are going to work with someone and be with someone every day in the film room, meeting room. You develop a relationship with these people, at least that’s my belief.”
Comments: I remember when Delhomme took over for Rodney Peete, and that was a heck of a comeback he led. It was sort of the game that made me become a fan of Delhomme's, and he helped resurrect a Panthers team that had suffered for several seasons.
(On building a relationship with wide receivers)- “So many people can talk about throwing routes in the offseason and this and that. The year we went to the Super Bowl, the first reps I took with Steve Smith and Muhsin Muhammad we’re in the third quarter of the first game of the season. Rodney Peete was the starter and Chris Weinke and myself. We all rotated so I didn’t take any reps with those guys. I get in at halftime and we did alright that year. I think just over time you learn routes. They know what you throw well and I think that is what makes coaches good too. You have got to play to the strengths of your players. I think that’s the biggest thing. Something that’s always been preached is players. You can have the best play drawn up, but if you can’t get it executed then it’s not any good.”
Comments: That's the biggest issue with our receivers -- they don't know how to run routes, and it's really hard to find the strengths of the receivers we currently have. I'm sure Ben Watson will end up being Delhomme's best friend.
(On why Cleveland made his short list of teams)- “I’m telling you, this team won the last four games. I don’t care how you look at it. When a team is 1-11 and you win the last (four games), there’s something. I don’t know what it is. There’s something that’s there. Certainly, coach Holmgren coming here. He’s done some good things so that was it.”
Comments: Delhomme left out, "...and because no one else wanted me." Nonetheless, I have no choice but to cheer Delhomme on and hope for the best this season.
0 recs |
36 comments
|
Comments
here is the video path from clevelandbrowns.com
http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/multimedia/mediaplayer.php?id=6811
A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths --- Steven Wright
I don't get it...
I remember when Kurt Warner went to the Giants after so many good years with St. Louis and he was awful….washed up…ready for the scrap heap. Then he goes to Arizona, beats out the golden boy in Leinhart and had everyone questioning his decision to finally hang ‘em up at the end of this season. Jake had one bad season. One. What did Quinn or D.A. ever do to lead us to believe that they were the answer? We focus on Jake’s meltdown in the playoffs…let’s talk about D.A.s meltdown against the Bengals which kept us out of the playoffs. I’m sorry, but I think the team is moving in the right direction and I want to see something built the right way…you need a leader on the field and we have that in Jake and Seneca. This team is gonna surprise people…
by the irish chop on Mar 18, 2010 12:36 PM EDT reply actions
Kurt Warner as a Giant:
174-277, 63 COMP%, 6 TD’s, 4 INT’s, 7.4 YPA
Jake Delhomme over his final 12 games:
195-355, 55 COMP%, 9 TD’s, 22 INT’s, 6.25 YPA
Everyone says Warner “struggled” but his numbers (percentage wise) are better than Delhomme’s career averages.
Warner struggled because he wasn’t protected. Delhomme struggled because he sucks. Did I mention that Warner’s best receiving threats were his TE and his RB? Delhomme also had two 1,000 yard rushers and Steve Smith.
Warner with the Giants is a bad comp, mainly because Kurt Warner was still a productive player. Delhomme isn’t.
by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 18, 2010 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I should add that Delhomme is making a switch into a much tougher division.
09’ Total Team Defensive ranks:
NFC South
Atlanta Falcons – 21st
New Orleans Saints – 25th
Tampa Bay Bucs – 27th
AFC North
Cincinnati Bengals – 4th
Pittsburgh Steelers – 5th
Baltimore Ravens – 3rd
I don’t want this to sound like I am rooting against Jake, because that is the furthest thing from the truth. I am just a realist.
by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 18, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions
He might be done, but he might be able to turn it around. It all comes down to if he can regain his confidence and just play the game without pressing. I wouldn’t get too excited about his terrible season he had. He really could have just had a bad season.
"My signature is only one line. You're welcome."
So 12 games out of 97 games indicates he “sucks”…oh, okay, I get it now. I guess Kurt’s stats for the 2002 season when he had the greatest show on turf and a QB rating of 67.4 means he too “sucks”.
Stats can be manipulated in any way you want to paint the picture you choose to view. I know one thing, Holmgren just signed somebody who you say “sucks”…I guess he really isn’t that good at talent evaluation. By the way, who were some of the QBs he’s mentored? I forget…
by the irish chop on Mar 18, 2010 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
So 12 games out of 97 games indicates he "sucks"…oh, okay, I get it now.
They aren’t just 12 games. they are his last 12 games. Massive difference. When a QB cannot throw the ball to the right team, it is a big deal in my book.
I guess Kurt’s stats for the 2002 season when he had the greatest show on turf and a QB rating of 67.4 means he too "sucks".
At this point in time Warner was, 31 years old, a multiple time MVP and had shown the ability to carry a team. I think you are forgetting what kind of QB Delhomme is. At his best he was a game manager that could win a game. Not a MVP.
Again, Warner is a poor comparison.
Stats can be manipulated in any way you want to paint the picture you choose to view. I know one thing, Holmgren just signed somebody who you say "sucks"…I guess he really isn’t that good at talent evaluation. By the way, who were some of the QBs he’s mentored? I forget…
Really? We are at this point? Blind following?
What coaching staff in the NFL knows Jake Delhomme better than anyone? I would guess it is the Panther offensive staff. That franchise paid him 12 million to go away. That should be more red flags than all the flags in China.
First of all, I agree that Holmgren knows QB’s. But if you expect me to sit by and nod along with every move that the Browns make, then you are mistaken. For the most part I have been very excited for what Homgren and Heckert have done this offseason. Where we part ways is when we come to the Jake Delhomme signing.
I have my own ideas on how to build and run a franchise, and Holmgren damn sure doesn’t follow my rules. But that is why we come here. To discuss the Browns and argue/discuss the moves and lack of moves that this team will make.
Holmgren has usually been very good at choosing QB’s but that doesn’t mean that Jake Delhomme is a good signing. In fact, Holmgren has been horrible at free agent signings.
by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 18, 2010 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions
“In…. Holmgren…. We…. Trust…..”
< chanted in a slow zombielike voice >
by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Mar 19, 2010 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions
funny, but close to the truth at this point. blind faith is exactly what holmgren gets right now, we have no reason not to.
I have a lot of respect for Holmgren, but the blind faith thing doesn’t come easily to me, and the more fervently I hear it here, the more I back away.
Also, I wonder how bad the comedown is going to be for some people in a few months months when, say, Delhomme ends up starting like DA Mark II. I think I’ll stick with expectation management and reserve judgment.
by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Mar 20, 2010 1:40 AM EDT up reply actions
the reasons i’m okay with it are these:
1. homlgren has had a ton of success in the past. i believe he knows what it takes to get this ship steered in the right direction.
2. it isn’t like politics, like i’m blindly following someone who will lead us to ruin; it’s only football, not life and death (debatable some sunday afternoons).
3. we’ve been so poor for so long; now that it appears we’re in a better place than we have ever been, seemingly ascending toward consistent respectability with respectable guys, i’m trying to be as positive as i can be.
all that being said, great points RDC.
Well said DN. You’re right, we are talking about sports here, and I can understand riding a wave of optimism based on the way things are looking up around here.
I’m mostly willing to give Holmgren the benefit of the doubt at this point, given his considerable track record, but when it starts sounding like “You dare to debate the Almighty Holmgren’s decisions?” it seems like more faith than is really healthy.
by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Mar 20, 2010 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions
fair enough. i guess i wouldn’t fall in line if he cut joe thomas or benched cribbs, or something clearly ridiculous to everyone.
….cut joe thomas….
Blasphemy!
by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Mar 21, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Watch your front.
For the love of Joe Thomas.....
by North Coast Flea on Mar 21, 2010 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions
joe thomas is so fast he could “high-low” me by himself. i need to watch from any possible angle of attack; and i still won’t see him coming.
I can high – low you by myself.
It’s called using your arms and legs in unison.
"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."
by SpecialBrownie on Mar 22, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions
? Nothing. Just trying to comment in a whitty sense.
You’re just a little tough skinned today it seems. Lighten up man.
"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."
by SpecialBrownie on Mar 22, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Cool. It’d be stupid to fight over a Joe Thomas joke. Nothing good can come from that…
"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."
by SpecialBrownie on Mar 22, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions
Don’t worry about SB. He’s an alcoholic.
If you're at the table and you don't see a sucker..... you're it.
by Brownie's Year on Mar 23, 2010 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t drink.
"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."
by SpecialBrownie on Mar 23, 2010 7:34 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t either.
If you're at the table and you don't see a sucker..... you're it.
by Brownie's Year on Mar 23, 2010 8:43 AM EDT up reply actions
This is false.
"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."
by SpecialBrownie on Mar 23, 2010 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions
You have to be encouraged that both Fujita and Delhomme made a big point about how it felt right and they felt the the team was heading in the right direction. They both came from franchises that when they started out were losing teams and both made Super Bowl appearances with those teams.
by Roger Dorn on Mar 18, 2010 1:52 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
I think this was a good move for Mike Holmgren. I didn’t believe in it at first but I think Delhomme could have two or so more decent years with this team. For one this team should be able to really run the damn ball next year if anything. Delhomme definitely could be great for the confidence in our young receivers, I think at least one will have a breakout year. Hopefully Robiskie and Massaquoi both find some pretty decent game, and the offense won’t be that bad.
I have a feeling Delhomme really can find his old form again and at least be a pretty decent NFL quarterback, though I definitely think Holmgren is planning to draft our QB of the future this year, whomever he is. Lets just hope the draft falls for us and we can address our biggest needs (S, CB, WR? RG?) between now and training camp.
"My signature is only one line. You're welcome."
bernie19kosar
I like your analysis very much. I tend to look for your posts. here are some of my thoughts on this topic.
I don’t even know if delhomme will play the whole season, if he isn’t playing well, they may stick the rookie in if they think he’s ready. Lets not forget that delhomme is simply a one or maybe only a 1/2 season middle man. I’m not looking forward to that QB roller coaster we may be heading for again.
delhomme never looked like warner in his career for any extended period of time. but we only need him to be better than average for one season….i hope he can do that.
now, i just ponder every day, what rookie are we taking? I really have no idea. My far favorite is bradford, but am interested in Lafeveour. At least he’d make for some interesting signs on game day!
First of all, thanks.
Secondly, if Delhomme was brought in to start a handful of games, and I hope to Joe Thomas that this is the case, then what was the harm in letting Seneca Wallace do this?
I hope Jake Delhomme finds what he has been missing and turns back into a decent QB allowing whatever rookie we draft (McCoy, Bradford, LeFevour, Tebow, etc.) to watch and learn for a full season.
But I think the more likely outcome is we draft a QB, Delhomme is wretched, and the crowds, radio, and talking heads start screaming for the young rookie. Kind of like the Charlie Frye experiment went down. That did not help Frye and it did not help this franchise. Wallace may not be great, but I think he would have been decent for 1-2 seasons.
That is why I worry about draft Tebow. If we draft him, the earliest he should play for the Browns should be in 2012. That would be two full seasons of Delhomme. That could kill me.
by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 19, 2010 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions
by the way, i had a fry jersey, quinn, plus others and am sick of it….i am ordering a custom made #19 KOSAR jersey, that will NEVER go out in Cleveland!
how many QB jerseys have been made in Cleveland for the past 10 years?

by 
























