Dawgs By Nature: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Deadline: Where each team stands right now

"The fans are ruthless and don't deserve a winner," Anderson wrote Tuesday in a terse e-mail when asked for a reaction to being released. "I will never forget getting cheered when I was injured.

"I know at times I wasn't great. I hope and pray I'm playing when my team comes to town and (we) roll them."

Stay classy Derek.

Link.

4 months ago Awesomeness_tiny Bernie19Kosar 234 comments 2 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The fans are ruthless and don’t deserve a winner

HAHA

Stay ruthless my friends. And we do deserve a lot better than this sucky frisbee hucker.

If you're at the table and you don't see a sucker..... you're it.

by Brownie's Year on Mar 9, 2010 10:48 PM EST reply actions  

Hey now, let’s not bring frisbees into this.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Mar 10, 2010 12:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, they did nothing wrong.

Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!

by Andrew Tolliver on Mar 10, 2010 9:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Like I said in the other fanshot about this, “we roll them”? Please, Derek. You won’t be part of that “we”. You’ll be on the sidelines doodling on a clipboard.

by emily522 on Mar 9, 2010 10:56 PM EST reply actions  

…and/or getting penalized!

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Mar 10, 2010 1:58 AM EST up reply actions  

FOR doodling on said clipboard

Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!

by Andrew Tolliver on Mar 10, 2010 9:06 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m glad DA is gone, but cheering when a player is injured is Bush league.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 9, 2010 11:07 PM EST reply actions  

Right. If I got cheered when I was injured I’d be upset as well. That’s a terrible thing to do.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 9, 2010 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed. He has a reason to be upset about that. But the other talk is crap.

by emily522 on Mar 9, 2010 11:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Fans cheered when he was hurt, that is bullshit, those fans need to look at themselves everyday. I hope the hell Cleveland doesn’t turn into Philly.
 However let it go Derek, you made a great wage here, and you had a chance to take a team into the playoffs and struggled tremendously against the Bengals. Good luck where ever you go.

by Grockcubs on Mar 10, 2010 7:13 AM EST up reply actions  

If there are any Browns fans in Oregon, I’m up for pooling together a bounty.

by gahnki on Mar 9, 2010 11:08 PM EST reply actions  

Oh my god that’s funny. Tell us how you really feel Derek. No wonder you didn’t have the intangibles to play quarterback in the NFL.

MOOOOM! The people in the stands who paid good money to see me got mad and boo’d when I threw 4 picks and derailed our playoff chances! They are ruthless and don’t deserve a winner!

Shouldn’t it be good that we have a rabid fanbase that loves the team and wants to win that bad?

"My signature is only one line. You're welcome."

by jaws. on Mar 9, 2010 11:23 PM EST reply actions  

No wonder you didn’t have the intangibles or tangibles to play quarterback in the NFL.

Fixed!

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Mar 10, 2010 1:56 AM EST up reply actions  

He wasn’t upset that they booed when they played poorly, he was upset that they cheered when he got injured. That’s not even close to being the same thing.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 10, 2010 9:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Welcome to football, Mr. CryBaby!

(I now feel sick knowing that I ever rooted for this douche in the first half of 2007.)
I hope he fails miserably.

by Simmsinns on Mar 9, 2010 11:36 PM EST reply actions  

(I now feel sick knowing that I ever rooted for this douche in the first half of 2007.)

You and all Browns fans everywhere.

by emily522 on Mar 9, 2010 11:45 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe 1 out of 10 fans cheered that…. so he lumps all his pitiful play and frustrations on 100% of the fans? what an intelligent guy. a true class act and just the type of guy you want leading your team.

by rockybrown on Mar 9, 2010 11:53 PM EST reply actions  

hey, we’re on the same page with the simultaneous comments

by rockybrown on Mar 9, 2010 11:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I was at that game. And I’d say it was less that 1 out of 10. Of those that were cheering, it was because the backup (I’m pretty sure it was Dorsey) was loosening up. I’m pretty sure the same reaction would have happened if DA just got benched for sucking.

The defense was playing their ass off in that game and the offense sucked so much. It was a frustrating season and most people were totally off the DA bandwagon long before that point in time and it just sucked to watch him play.

fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com

by Ryan Kelsey on Mar 10, 2010 11:30 PM EST up reply actions  

F%&k the Browns. All they did was send me to a Pro Bowl...

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 9, 2010 11:53 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

…where I played like crap!

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 12:03 AM EST up reply actions  

There should be a speech bubble there that says “Ha! I fooled you all!”

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 10, 2010 11:56 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

TRUTH

Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!

by Andrew Tolliver on Mar 10, 2010 9:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I disagree. I would call it a very small percentage. The booing was quite loud and obnoxious. It had to be half if not more of the crowd, which regardless gives him a very valid point.

Its not about stepping up and being a man, it not about leading the team to victory. For one its going to take more than one man to do it, especially when the defense can’t hold a lead, the line can’t protect and the WR’s can’t catch balls, so how about you say lets find a team to step up and take the browns to victory.

Its just as tactless and pitiful to cheer your own team player as it is to publicly blast them in the media. So both sides are quite pathetic

by The Licensed Pessimist on Mar 10, 2010 11:15 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

This.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 10, 2010 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

You didn’t disagree with me. I said:

Cheering for a player’s injury whether an opponent or your own team is terrible and disgusting.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Secondly, the QB is the most important position, and yes we need a leader at QB. Thanks for explaining that it will take more than one guy, I wasn’t aware of that before. Our QB play has been atrocious since the team returned in 99.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagree. I would call it a very small percentage.

I think this might be what he meant. I read it as wouldn’t instead of would.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 10, 2010 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough, I suppose that wording confused me. Again I asked in the other thread about people who were in attendace and they said it was a small percentage. I was not there so I cannot say for certain.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

There was loud booing. That was because DA and the offense sucked and just pretty much lost the game.

Then there was some very mild cheering once it was clear DA was hurt, but, more importantly the backup was warming up and the fans didn’t have to watch another DA turnover.

fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com

by Ryan Kelsey on Mar 10, 2010 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

next time he will deserve the boos… it should be fun. lets get sean rodgers to do a belly flop sack on him

by rockybrown on Mar 9, 2010 11:58 PM EST reply actions  

DA: Yeah! And they made me have a passer rating worse than JaMarcus Russell! So what if I throw a 7 yard pass 80 MPH. A WR’s supposed to catch…. no offense, Braylon.
Braylon: None taken. It’s all Cleveland’s fault that I dropped those passes.

This got me laughing. “None taken”.

Probably the only Cleveland Browns fan in all of Sydney, NSW.

by skipkirk on Mar 10, 2010 12:39 AM EST up reply actions  

I thought it would get some laughs :)

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 11:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Like I said. A small percentage of drunken jerks does not ever represent me.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 9:40 AM EST up reply actions  

That’s fine. But if there are significant number of drunken jerks acting like idiots at a game then it reflects on the entire fanbase. Look at how Phily fans are regarded all because one guy threw a snowball at Santa Claus. So if a group of fans is booing or cheering at a game then it reflects on all the fans, even if you weren’t part of that. That’s the way it’s always been in sports. We (as Cleveland fans) make judgements about other fans bases because of something a few of them do, so it goes both ways.

Now, Anderson should have taken the high road and not said anything. But I can understand him being upset about getting cheered when he was injured because that’s got to be a horrible feeling for a football player. I was listening to Mike & Mike this morning and Mike Golic, as a former football player, completely understood where DA was coming from and he said he would have probably felt the same way. Again, he shouldn’t have necessarily said it publicly but I’m sure he was frustrated after being released.

We seem to forget sometimes that these players are human beings and they have feelings and emotions just like the rest of us. DA may not have been a great quarteback but that doesn’t mean he deserved the treatment he got from some fans. Being a bad football player does not make you a bad person. I know there were many things said on here about DA the football player, and that was all justified, but many fans take that too far and criticize the person, not the player. So I can understand why he’s upset. As fwembt said below, we know there are many idiot sports fans in Cleveland (just like in every other city) and unfortunately sometimes those fans do represent the rest of us.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 10, 2010 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually, as a whole. Philly fans are drunken idiots.

Proof

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 10, 2010 10:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Rec.

Like I said, I can see DA being upset about people cheering for him when injured. (I was not one of those people. I was more like: “Oh, sh*t now we have Ken Dorsey coming in.”) But saying stuff like Cleveland fans don’t deserve a winner is kind of ridiculous.

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 11:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Derek Anderson is a human with thoughts and feelings while also collecting 9 million dollars/year. He needs to not be so thin-skinned. Part of the life you sign up for as a professional athlete leaves you vulnerable to situations like the one we are debating. While I was never cheer an injury to him (and while I root for his success as a member of the Browns) I feel absolutely no sympathy for him.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I never said I felt sympathy for him. Yes, being a professional athlete means you get booed by fans when you’re bad and that’s fine. Cheering an injury is a completely different thing. And making $9 million a year doesn’t take away his feelings and emotions so I don’t see how that’s relevant.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 10, 2010 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

The 9 million/yr mitigates how much the fanbase cares about his feelings or emotions. He is being thin-skinned, even if you were to assume the entire crowd cheered his injury (which is not the case.)

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess I’m not the kind of person that thinks that if a person is making millions of dollars then that means you can do to him whatever you want, and he should just accept it because he’s got lots of money. Money doesn’t solve everything.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 10, 2010 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve said before I would not boo someone’s injury, and at the same time I will support any Browns player that takes the field (unless they are a terrible person off the field.) My main point in this is that Derek needs to shut up and play. Take the good money he is earning and understand that some drunen low character fans do not represent an entire population. Avoid making blanket statements, avoid pissing off everyone else in the fanbase that had nothing to do with this incident.

The fanbase doesn’t deserve a title? Seriously? He doesn’t know the first thing about being a fan of Cleveland teams.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

As I said, he shouldn’t have said it and he knows that which is why he apologized. I’m just saying that I can understand why he would be upset.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 10, 2010 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

he apologized bc his agent said wtf are you doing? He meant every word of it

by Kimble_79 on Mar 10, 2010 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

You don’t know that.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 10, 2010 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree. It’s perfectly fine for him to feel animosity toward the fans that did this, I just don’t think it should have become public.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Avoid making blanket statements, avoid pissing off everyone else in the fanbase that had nothing to do with this incident.

Anyone who reads clecom or listens to WKNR has reason to question the class and intelligence of this fanbase. The general reaction to this announcement has been nothing more than confirmation of what he said. The thinking fan is, I fear, in the minority here.

by fwembt on Mar 10, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess I am just against “categorizing fanbases” in general.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 4:51 PM EST up reply actions  

But it happens all the time, by everybody (including us — how often do we make blanket statements about Steelers fans or Yankee fans or anyone else whose teams we don’t like).

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 10, 2010 10:19 PM EST up reply actions  

What are you talking about?

Those statements are 100% true.

Especially ones about Philly.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 10, 2010 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

The 9million does not mitigate character.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 10, 2010 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I am not here to judge someone those that cheered Derek’s injury or those that threw the beer bottles onto the field during the Jacksonville game. I am certain that some of the culprits regret their decision.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Mike Golic

He cracks me up when talking about the Indians. Mike Greenberg was like “Oh, maybe the Indians will get 60 wins” and Mike goes, “Dude, are you done? Seriously!”

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree but did he ever say anything about it right after it happened? He could have said how much he resented that right after and most fans wouldn’t have minded he said it, and as evidenced by the posts…would definitely agree…and if he did say something about it right after it happened (I’m not sure if he did or not) then why drag it back out now except to be an ass?

. So he just waits until he’s released before voicing his issues? Talk about butthurt. I don’t begrudge him having ‘feelings’ of course, but when his ‘feelings’ consist of taking a parting shot at the fans who for the vast majority of the time wanted desperately for him to do well…no matter how many bonehead ints he threw, sacks he rolled right into, and times he laid on the ground or moped around with his shoulders sagging when the shit was hitting the fan…then he can take his feelings, and his ass, out the door and go hold a clipboard

by johnnyphoenix on Mar 10, 2010 5:52 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

This is funny after reading about the way Fujita just left N.O. Talk about complete opposites.

by mich_n_trum84 on Mar 10, 2010 2:11 AM EST reply actions  

I’d say this isn’t that far from the truth. If some of the more extreme voices on here and the mean level on cleveland.com are a representative sample, he’s pretty close to right. This fanbase doesn’t understand economics and is given to knee-jerk reaction. Was it the classiest way to go? No. But it isn’t that bad.

by fwembt on Mar 10, 2010 4:48 AM EST reply actions  

The defintion of fans (fanatics) lends itself to kneejerk reactions. I’d be hardpressed to find any fanbase not have some type of kneejerk reaction.

The guy made millions and should appreciate the great fortune he has had as a professional football player. He can act however he wants and make whatever statements he wants. But, trashing fans for being fanatics reveals a lack of appreciation and professionalism. He is what he is: a serviceable backup QB who will not lead a team to the Super Bowl. And to teams looking to sign him, statements like this should be a red flag.

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin

by Spidey on Mar 10, 2010 7:59 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

But there are plenty of intelligent fans who don’t act that way. Being fanatic about something doesn’t mean you have to act stupid.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 10, 2010 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Some people just don’t realize this. Like the fans throwing CD players and batteries when everyone else was throwing plastic beer bottles.

The sporting gods hate Cleveland, they give us false hopes, then yank it out from under us like a tablecloth.

by North Coast Flea on Mar 10, 2010 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure, there will be stupid fans – and they are found in every city (not just Cleveland – he’s fooling himself if he thinks otherwise).

As a QB making millions, he should not be surprised when Joe Six-Pack making $40K/year boos him when he has a piss-poor performance – or cheers when he leaves the game.

DA can say and do whatever he wants, and pass whatever judgments about Cleveland and its fans. My point is that any team looking to sign him should be wary of his tin ears.

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin

by Spidey on Mar 10, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

He never said anything about fans booing him so I don’t know why you’re bringing that up. I’m sure he knows he was bad and he deserved some of them. But cheering when a player is injured is completely different than booing a bad peformance. Just because a player makes millions of dollars doesn’t mean it’s appropriate to cheer when he’s injured — how is that justified?

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 10, 2010 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I loathe the idea that slapping down $40 gives you the right hurl invective and abuse at someone. We have, societally, become imbued with this idea that we have the privilege to scream whatever we want at someone so long as we have paid for the opportunity. It’s sickening and reflects a complete and utter lack of class. Cheering an injured player falls under that same category.

by fwembt on Mar 10, 2010 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

And to build upon the point I made above, I don’t like categorizing people as a society. There is too much breadth to lump society into one easy statement. In my eyes, it’s simply a way of portraying oneself as sophisticated compared to the unintelligible masses.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you argue any of the points or just the way they were made? It’s not in keeping with civilized society to sit in a circle and cheer the injury of another human being or hurl the most vulgar insults we can think of his direction. As a society, we accept that behavior. Anyone who has been to a sporting event knows that to be fact. Your beliefs regarding observation of a society don’t have any bearing on the validity of those observations.

by fwembt on Mar 10, 2010 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Know what? That last line isn’t really needed to advance the discourse and could be taken as baiting. I wish I had a partial delete button.

by fwembt on Mar 10, 2010 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

But, as I said above, people make blanket statement about entire fanbases based on a few bad apples all the time. We do it ourselves, about Steelers fans or Ravens fans on this site. And Yankees fans and Red Sox fans and Lakers fans and so many others.

I’m sure DA knows it wasn’t all Browns fans who were acting like that, or even most of them, but it was enough to make him remember the cheering when he was injured. And, judging by the comments made here about DA (by mostly intelligent people), I can only imagine what he’s heard shouted at him from drunken idiots at the stadium. It may not be everyone, but after hearing it so many times I’m sure he got quite frustrated. Like I said, he shouldn’t have said it publicly but I can certainly understand why he felt that way. And the public outcry against him wasn’t really necessary. Those fans are mostly made at him for playing terrible football the past two years, not making that statement — that’s just a reason to let out the frustration.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 10, 2010 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, but the blanket statements about Steelers fans and Yankees fans are just good natured ribbing for teams that we loathe. I suppose it’s a double standard, but I don’t think they are the same situation.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I know that. I guess my point was that you seemed to be upset that DA was making judgements on entire fan bases based on a small percentage of idiots but we — fans, media, players, coaches, pretty much everyone — do the same thing. I realize it’s one thing to make comment on a blog (like we do) and another thing to say something publicly like he did, so you’re right that the situations aren’t exactly the same.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 8:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Yea. I think Kelsey summed up my feelings a lot better than I could have elsewhere. Making a comment about what this fanbase deserves cuts really deep. I took it personally.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 11, 2010 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

I know what you mean by society. But you and I being a part of it does not mean we hold the same standards that are the societal norm. I’ve been a Browns fan my entire life and lived in Ohio most of my life and I am becoming more convinced that the loudmouth “bad apples” are not in the minority. Of course DA isn’t going to say he’s disappointed that a selection of fans cheered his injury, that isn’t how people commonly converse.

If I were to pay my $7.50 to walk into a HS basketball gym do I then garner the right to say whatever I want? Can I scream vulgarities at your daughter if she commits a turnover? Of course not, we all agree that is poor behavior and I think that someone would say something. My point about society at large is that exact thing happens every gameday at Cleveland Browns Stadium and there is no sort of public outcry against it. That even 25% of the fans thought it was okay to cheer a player being injured is appalling and also speaks to the society that allows them to think that will go unpunished and uncorrected.

by fwembt on Mar 11, 2010 1:31 AM EST up reply actions  

If I were to pay my $7.50 to walk into a HS basketball gym do I then garner the right to say whatever I want? Can I scream vulgarities at your daughter if she commits a turnover?

Difference between professional and amateur.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 11, 2010 2:26 AM EST up reply actions  

exactly, his daughter is not being directly paid millions of dollars by my ticket at the door. This isn’t a very good hypothetical example. But I get what your saying overall

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 8:32 AM EST up reply actions  

I still don’t think getting paid millions of dollars gives people the right to scream obscenities and throw objects at athletes.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 8:59 AM EST up reply actions  

I think there is a distinction between a pro football stadium and a girls HS basketball game. One setting will allow for more unreasonable behavior than the other. There are definitely lines though in both settings that have been crossed and probably shouldn’t be. It’s a lot more difficult to control in an environment of 65,000 fans compared to 150.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 11, 2010 9:22 AM EST up reply actions  

yes, with 65k people there will always be those w/out common sense and act like idiots. The environments between the examples above plays a big role, but still the overall rule should apply to both. Nobody should cheer an injury. But again, with that many people, you get the bad apples in there for any region or location.

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 9:27 AM EST up reply actions  

I disagree. It’s the difference between conducting yourself and conducting yourself poorly. A player getting paid to play is no more deserving of your epithets than Roger’s hypothetical daughter. I’m a professional at what I do, should people be allowed berate me with all the vulgarity they can muster?

by fwembt on Mar 11, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

We can’t really expect to treat amateurs and professionals the same. Professionals are held to a higher standard and in some cases, athletes being one of them, are paid handsomely for it.

Booing Derek Anderson for going 3-17 with an INT is socially acceptable.

Booing little Ms. Dorn for chasing a butterfly instead of hitting a cutoff man isn’t.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 11, 2010 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

But I’m not talking about booing. I’ve been booed in college and HS, that’s not a big deal.

by fwembt on Mar 11, 2010 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Fans have every right to boo professional athletes or say whatever they want. Shouting at the players is part of the experience of buying the ticket.

"My signature is only one line. You're welcome."

by jaws. on Mar 11, 2010 10:01 PM EST up reply actions  

No, it isn’t. It’s uncivilized and immature.

by fwembt on Mar 12, 2010 1:35 AM EST up reply actions  

This isn’t golf or tennis. Crowd interaction is part of the game. I’m not saying people should all get heavily profane and make threats of gruesome violence, but cheering and booing is all part of football.

B19K is exactly right. Professionals ought to realize that interacting with the crowd is part of their job. Of course we don’t want hundreds of people screaming Marco Matterazzi-level insults every week, but a few boos isn’t such a bad thing at an NFL game.

"My signature is only one line. You're welcome."

by jaws. on Mar 12, 2010 2:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Cheering and booing is fine. But you said they could “say whatever they want” — that’s what he’s talking about. Shouting profane insults all game long is not part of the experience of buying a ticket.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 12, 2010 8:05 AM EST up reply actions  

And shouting profanity really ruins the experience for people that don’t like that who happen to be sitting around that particular rude/drunk fan as well

by Kimble_79 on Mar 12, 2010 8:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Fan no longer implies fanatic in common usage. It’s disingenuous. Are you a fan? Are you a fanatic? My mother is a Browns fan, she is by no means “motivated or characterized by an extreme, uncritical enthusiasm.”

by fwembt on Mar 10, 2010 4:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I wasn’t at the game.

I wasn’t happy that DA was hurt, but I was happy that he was going to be replaced.

Why? The same reason I want Brandon McDonald, Robert Royal and John St.Clair to be replaced. They suck at their job.

Does this make me a “bad fan”? I don’t think so.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 10, 2010 11:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Bingo. I was excited, not for the pain that DA was feeling that second, but because I was going to see a new QB.

DA, obviously thinking all 70,000 people were thinking about him at that moment, took it personally. It had very little to do with him at all.

fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com

by Ryan Kelsey on Mar 11, 2010 12:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Haha, I remember thinking to myself watching at home that I couldn’t believe Dorsey was going in. I expected worse than DA.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 11, 2010 12:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I was like “Oh crap” because I knew Dorsey would do worse.

by emily522 on Mar 11, 2010 12:15 AM EST up reply actions  

That was my exact thought too.

The sporting gods hate Cleveland, they give us false hopes, then yank it out from under us like a tablecloth.

by North Coast Flea on Mar 13, 2010 6:03 PM EST up reply actions  

The economics thing was speaking to the general knowledge of the fanbase. No one argues that people cheered because DA was injured. You’re telling me that there was mass appreciation that we were going to feted with the presence of Ken Dorsey? Give me a break. Cheering that someone is injured is subhuman. DA shouldn’t be expected to put up with that just because he plies his trade in the public view.

It’s football. We’re fans. Get over it.

This is the exact problem. Boorish and idiotic behavior is being excused under the basis of being a fan. No part of acting like a mature adult includes turning off your brain for four hours on Sunday and having carte blanche to act however you so choose because you are a fan. It’s pigheaded and immature no matter where it happens, whether that be Cleveland or any other city you mentioned.

by fwembt on Mar 11, 2010 1:38 AM EST up reply actions  

It’s hard to believe, but there was a segment of Browns fans that thought that Dorsey had been groomed for so many years that he was ready to take over and perform better than DA. It seems ridiculous, but I definitely know that segment of the Browns fan population existed.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 11, 2010 9:24 AM EST up reply actions  

And remember, “better than DA” at times has not been a very high barrier to overcome.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Mar 11, 2010 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

. No one argues that people cheered because DA was injured.

Yes, people argue it. In fact, I’ve been making that argument since it was first reported (see my link below to the original conversation- and my original first hand account of this nonsense). The cheers were for Dorsey, for the change of QB, for the fact that Anderson got up and was able to be helped off the field.

Boorish and idiotic behavior isn’t the basis of being a fan, but it happens. I really don’t think it’s that big of a deal. Even in the worst of situations, where the team is terribly disappointing, where the quarterback is awful, in the sport that the fan base cares about the most, after years of getting their heart ripped out, the worst we can point at is:
- beer bottles thrown on the field once
- booing crappy QBs
- arguably a handful of fans may have cheered the injury of a QB.
- Cheering Couch’s injury.

Subhuman? nah. If I remember right, you are an international soccer fan. In my mind, the worst Browns fan on his worst day is pretty tame in the grand realm of human’s fanatical supporters of sports teams. And if anything, our generation of Cleveland sports fan is more civil than it was 25-35 years ago.

fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com

by Ryan Kelsey on Mar 11, 2010 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

No, you argue it. The MSM, blogs, and players all agree that at least some contingent was cheering that DA was injured. Cheering injuries and hurling invective is all part of being obnoxious and rude. There is no call for it, it doesn’t accomplish anything, and it gives the impression that our fanbase is a bunch of douchebags.

Why engage in caddish behavior at all? What is the point? Yes, it is sub-human to stand and scream the worst thing you can think at your fellow man simply because you don’t approve of the way he does his job.

I am an English football fan, yes. English football is an entirely more pleasant fanbase to be around. The days of the hoolies (and I’ll admit my club was one of the worst) and crushes are long since over. The supporters are generally more self-policing and fan misbehavior more harshly punished. All in all, it’s a better environment to enjoy a game.

by fwembt on Mar 12, 2010 1:44 AM EST up reply actions  

DA wasn’t cheered when injured. I know that’s how it got reported. It didn’t happen though. The cheering was about him getting up and about the change from a QB playing terrible to an unknown. But whatever.

I am honestly shocked that you and others are so offended by fan behavior at Browns games. Especially in the last 10 years. I really don’t know how to argue against it. Unless you are an overprotective parent, I really just don’t understand.

fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com

by Ryan Kelsey on Mar 12, 2010 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

yes, most of those hoolies are gone, but there are still some. I have seen them. I agree the supporters are very self-policing, but so are browns fans. it was a small minority that actually were cheering for the injury.

and football in america is still much better when it comes to the craziness of the fanbase when compared to “futbol” in many other european countries, especially in spain. the big rivalries still get some crazies, even in england (like arsenal and chelsea)

by bross09 on Mar 12, 2010 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

DA says he’s sorry, sort of:

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2010/03/derek_anderson_apologizes_for.html

Sounds as if he might like to have that email back. Just like many of his passes as a Brown!

OK, I’ll stop it with the cheap shots on DA, unless we ever have the good fortune to face him on the other side of the field.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Mar 10, 2010 9:47 AM EST reply actions  

no that is his agent talking…not Derek. He still means every word he said

by Kimble_79 on Mar 10, 2010 11:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Really? You talked to Derek and asked him that? That’s fantastic reporting.

by fwembt on Mar 10, 2010 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

While it’s unverifiable, I’d be willing to bet it’s right.

by gahnki on Mar 10, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s complete conjecture based on arm’s length observation of someone none of us know.

by fwembt on Mar 10, 2010 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Conjecture based on a predictable pattern of behavior that follows any outburst with professional sports.

by gahnki on Mar 10, 2010 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Again, you don’t know him, so you don’t know. You are just guessing.

by fwembt on Mar 10, 2010 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

And you are guessing that I do not know him.

by gahnki on Mar 10, 2010 5:16 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Which, I don’t, but me pointing it out is as pedantic as fwembt harping on the original comment.

by gahnki on Mar 10, 2010 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Probably. I just don’t like it when people presume to know the motive behind the action. The action is really all that matters.

Mea culpa for dragging it out when I could have just said that begin with.

by fwembt on Mar 10, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with you. I get really annoyed by people constantly pretending that they know what an athlete is thinking or why they do things based on the few observations they have about that person. Certain people on this site do that all the time. (That’s not directed at gahnki, by the way.)

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 10, 2010 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Certain people on this site do that all the time.

So, you argue about blanketing people this whole thread, but yet you generalize and then blanket people in this site. Classy.

Disclaimer: This is funny serious.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 10, 2010 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

No need for the serious part, he said certain people.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 10, 2010 10:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Certain people is still generalizing to a point.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 10, 2010 11:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m thinking it was to avoid names.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 10, 2010 11:14 PM EST up reply actions  

How did I blanket people? I said “certain people” because I meant specific people. I just didn’t want to name names.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 10, 2010 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I like pushing buttons and I also ran myself into a hole but still decided to post.

I don’t know.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 10, 2010 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe you should stop trying to push people’s buttons so much — especially over insignificant things — because sometimes people get annoyed with that.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 9:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, but where’s the fun in that?

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 11, 2010 9:39 AM EST up reply actions  

It takes the sting out of it when you really intend it.

by fwembt on Mar 11, 2010 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Really? You talked to Derek and asked him that? That’s fantastic reporting.

All you have done is argue on here. Are you here to talk sports with logical objections or are you just a politician working on your game face for PR? Seriously! That is an observation that I am assuming happened based of historical fact from previous players who have done/said things like this. So take your debate class somewhere else fwembt. What were you too lazy to come up with a name so you just randomly hit letters on the keyboard?

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 1:07 AM EST up reply actions  

What in the heck are you talking about?

fwembt never claimed to know what DA was thinking or why he gave the apology — you did. That’s the difference. He doesn’t have to talk to Derek because he never claimed to know his motives. You were the one who said that you knew he didn’t mean it, that it only came from his agent. He was simply asking how you knew that. Maybe you should stop acting like you know the motives of someone just based on what you think you know about them and what you think you know about other situations.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 9:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m sorry, but this is pretty obvious, is it not. Hell ESPN reported the same thing I said a few hours after I posted that. I can certainly post my opinion on here just as you can. I didn’t say I “knew” that, I stated my opinion. And the rest of it was he was just irritating me b/c every post he had was arguing with somebody about something they said or the way they said it. I never claimed to have “known” Derek, nor do I “know” the inside of what he is thinking. That is a very common observation and is common sense based on factual information from previous players stating things like this. C’mon man seriously.

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 9:15 AM EST up reply actions  

and to further that notion, after the way Derek was treated (which I am not a fan of his) I would be ticked off too. Anybody that cheers when someone gets hurt shouldn’t be allowed in the freakin sports stadium. I realize he stunk that game, we all did, but I don’t agree with cheering for the way he went out.

Either case, the guy was ticking me off b/c he was arguing with everyone in the majority of his posts. It sounded more like he was practicing for a debate class or something. If you wanna get on here and post your opinion and argue that its one thing, but to pick apart little things about the way people state their opinion is a little ridiculous

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 9:19 AM EST up reply actions  

This is what you said:

no that is his agent talking…not Derek. He still means every word he said

ESPN reported that? Really? They reported that he wasn’t sincere in his apology and he still mean every word he said? I must have missed that.

This is my problem (and you’re not the only person who does this, either). You pretend to know that he wasn’t sincere with his apology when you have no idea if that’s true. So fwembt asked you if you talked to Derek and asked him that, and then you went off on him. It’s not “common sense” to know that he wasn’t being sincere. Not at all. Unless, I suppose, you assume that athletes are always insincere in their apologies, but how could you know that?

So maybe from now on you can stop pretending that you know what someone else is thinking — unless they’ve told you something directly — and stick to commenting on what you do know. Or, at least, admit that you’re just speculating when someone else calls you on it.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m sorry, but I assumed that it would be taken as my opinion….if I knew Derek and was an insider with him and his agent, or with the browns then why would I be on this post? I went off on him because of his smart@ss comment at the end.

Really? You talked to Derek and asked him that? That’s fantastic reporting.

that is not asking….and yes ESPN did say that

In the future though I will make sure to note that things are my opinion, which I would think 99% of people would have known.

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

No they, did not. No one has ever reported that DA was ever anything but sincere in his apology. Neither you nor I know what his motivation was, or what he thinks now. You are just guessing. That’s nothing more than you making an assumption about a person based on limited observation of him combined with assumptions you made about other people.

And no, I’m not practicing for debate. I’d just rather stick to the provable facts.

by fwembt on Mar 11, 2010 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I saw it with my own two freakin eyes last night….they stated that was their opinion of the matter as well. I really wish I could remember the name of the guy that said it…but i’m telling you it was on sportscenter…they played a clip of a radio show from Cleveland with fans calling in then they asked the analysts his opinion afterwards. which agreed with me. That is a FACT. Granted that was their opinion…but it was on last night!

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Meril Hodge was the one that gave that opinion last night…I remembered his face, but couldn’t remeber his name. Either case I’m not going to argue with anymore. Yes…that was an opinion of mine, yes…Meril Hodge stated the same opinion on ESPN last night, no…I do not assume to know every thought a player has, yes…it is VERY common for the agent to do damage control when an outburst like this comes along.

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Meril Hodge was a Steeler who forgot how to read.

Don’t listen to him.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 11, 2010 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

by the way here is another from ESPN by Steve Levy saying it was the agent….maybe you should watch more sportscenter!

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Also, SC pretty much sucks.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 11, 2010 1:58 PM EST up reply actions  

sorry, can’t help but go outta my way with this cat to prove my point…I’m done now

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

That is still all just opinion. My point is that you don’t know, Merril Hoge doesn’t know, and neither does Steve Levy. An abundance of people making the same mistake doesn’t make them right. ESPN cannot report on the inner workings of DA any better than you can.

by fwembt on Mar 11, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

We agree to disagree…I understand what your saying and I think you understand what I am. Truce

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I enjoy it for just information and highlights, not actual opinion or analysis.

by emily522 on Mar 11, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

So, because some guy on ESPN said it, that makes it true? I didn’t know the SportsCenter hosts were so powerful and all-knowing!

After all, we know people never say anything dumb on ESPN.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

again Brad, had you read the post I said that they stated the same OPINION I did. I DID NOT EVER SAY THEY TALKED WITH DEREK AND/OR HIS AGENT, so get off it already

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Hell ESPN reported the same thing I said a few hours after I posted that.

which was an OPINION…nothing more…whats your deal

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 3:29 PM EST up reply actions  

So now ESPN “reports” on opinions? Since when? Don’t people report on facts, not opinions?

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

you know how the media is now…they report opinions, facts, and sometimes just straight up lies as well. They should just do facts though.

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

That doesn’t pertain to the discussion we’re having. If you’re going to say ESPN “reported” something then it should be a fact, not some guy giving his opinion. ESPN has anchors who report facts and analysts who give opinions. There is a difference.

That would be like hearing Kirk Herbstreit say that he thinks Ohio State will win the national title and someone saying “ESPN reports that Ohio State will win the national title.” That’s not a report, that’s an opinion.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I said that they said exactly what I said originally. I never once stated they reportedly talked with Derek or his agent.

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Hell ESPN reported the same thing I said a few hours after I posted that.

That’s exactly what you said. ESPN “reported” it was true. It wasn’t a report, it was an opinion.

Honestly . . . how many times do I have to keep saying this to you? Do you really not understand the difference?

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

OMG…seriously. that is whats bothering you. You are anal

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 3:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Hell ESPN reported said the same thing I said a few hours after I posted that.

you feel better now?

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

So, let me get this straight — it’s okay to quote anyone’s opinion as a “report” from a news source making it sound as if that was a fact? That’s perfectly acceptable to you? You don’t see any distinction between fact and opinion?

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t see any difference between a “report” as your taking it and as what espn was “reporting” on as I took it. No

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe you should stop trying to push people’s buttons so much — especially over insignificant things — because sometimes people get annoyed with that.

your quote to specialbrownie yesterday. You are looking into this more than needs be Brad. Let it go

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, to everyone else, when you say that a news source “reports” something then they’re going to take it as a fact, not as an analyst giving their opinion. So you’d better stick to the definition that everyone else uses and not create your own.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I will make that very clear for you next time, but Emily didn’t seem to have a problem with understanding what I was saying. Nor did anyone else other than flem and you. Not one other person said one comment on this besides you and him, so I wouldn’t exactly say everyone.

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 7:35 PM EST up reply actions  

The problem is that analysts tend to analyze and give their opinion while reporters and anchors report what has occurred.

Giving the score of a game would be reporting, saying that a team lost because they ran the ball too much instead of passing would be an opinion that an analyst would give.

In the context of the discussion where what people know or what people think is the crux, misusing the word report is a big deal.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 11, 2010 7:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I get that…and will make sure to keep that a point now, but that wasn’t the point of this argument. If you read the whole thing, it was taken outta context and then didn’t ever get dropped. I get his point and I also get flem’s point and I do admit I don’t know what Derek truly feels, but didn’t expect my opinion to get this blown up. I just took Flem’s comment personal, then Brad chimed in. I’m just saying I stated an opinion, others agreed with me, ect….but yeah I will make that clear from here out.

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 7:48 PM EST up reply actions  

All Kimble’s saying is that he thinks that DA’s agent encouraged the apology, which is a possibility. It’s just what he thinks.

by emily522 on Mar 11, 2010 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m sure his agent did encourage the apology. That’s doesn’t mean it wasn’t sincere.

And, no, that’s not all he’s saying. He said Anderson wasn’t sincere in his apology, that he still meant his original comment, and he can’t know that.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know that there buddy ol pal. Just stating my OPINION. Thats why I keep calling it my OPINION

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

o·pin·ion
   /əˈpɪnyən/ Show Spelled[uh-pin-yuhn] Show IPA
–noun
1.
a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.
2.
a personal view, attitude, or appraisal.
3.
the formal expression of a professional judgment: to ask for a second medical opinion.
4.
Law. the formal statement by a judge or court of the reasoning and the principles of law used in reaching a decision of a case.
5.
a judgment or estimate of a person or thing with respect to character, merit, etc.: to forfeit someone’s good opinion.
6.
a favorable estimate; esteem: I haven’t much of an opinion of him.

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Did you really have to waste your time copying and pasting that?

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I know it’s your opinion. That’s all fwembt was doing — pointing out that it was your opinion, that you didn’t know for sure (even though you said it like you did know).

I know what an opinion is. You don’t need to keep repeating that to me. In the future, if you’re going to give an opinion then you should make it sound like an opinion, not a fact.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ll keep that in mind, but he ticked me off with his comment and now your jumping down my throat. again, truce.

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I think this is all a misunderstanding.

by emily522 on Mar 11, 2010 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, then he also thinks that it wasn’t sincere. That’s Kimble’s opinion. And honestly I bet DA still means a lot of what he said about us being “ruthless”, etc. Do I know that for sure? No, just like we don’t know that he was actually being sincere in his apology.

by emily522 on Mar 11, 2010 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

thank you, my lord, I humbly apologize for giving my opinion and showing that others thought the same opinion could be true. geez

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Dude, you are missing the point entirely.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 11, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Did you not read Emily’s post…that said it all…you guys are just looking way too far into something that isn’t there. I’ll tell you like I tell my wife when she is griping. Hey were on the same team here. Lets just drop the thing and move on!!!!!!

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

You pretend to know that he wasn’t sincere with his apology when you have no idea if that’s true.

I was guilty of that, too.

by emily522 on Mar 11, 2010 11:08 AM EST up reply actions  

it would have been different if he would have said something like, “maybe that is your opinion, but its not mine” or “is that actual information you got from derek” instead of his smart@ss comment.

by Kimble_79 on Mar 11, 2010 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Conjecture based on a predictable pattern of behavior that follows any outburst with professional sports.

What gahnki said… that’s why I think the apology was probably encouraged by his agent.

by emily522 on Mar 11, 2010 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Just about to post this.

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Anderson has setup visits with Seattle and Arizona already

by Kimble_79 on Mar 10, 2010 11:52 AM EST reply actions  

“Browns have discussed dealing QB Brady Quinn with other teams.”

Per Adam Schefter.

Who the hell is going to start at QB for this team next year?

"My signature is only one line. You're welcome."

by jaws. on Mar 10, 2010 12:45 PM EST reply actions  

Jeff George

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 10, 2010 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Let’s give it the whole offseason before we panic. My prediction was that the QB position would be completely overhauled.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Say if Quinn goes. We’re left with Wallace and Ratliff. Do you think Holgren’s going to draft a QB in the 1st now?

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

i hope not.

"My signature is only one line. You're welcome."

by jaws. on Mar 10, 2010 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

If Bradford is there, I have a feeling we would select him.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn’t mind him, but I think it’s unlikely he falls to us.

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Not unless Bradford falls to us and that doesn’t look like it will happen.

by Buckeye Brad on Mar 10, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the spectrum has shifted.

There is the way the Rams pass Bradford up

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 10, 2010 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

the rams are almost certain to take bradford. at least thats the word. If they don’t take him the redskins will.

How about trading Quinn to…. Buffalo! They need a QB and might be willing to part with Donte Whitner or Marshawn Lynch. I’d love it.

"My signature is only one line. You're welcome."

by jaws. on Mar 10, 2010 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Lynch is a bum and is not a Mangini guy. Wouldn’t happen.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 10, 2010 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah. No to Lynch.

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Just speculating because he is a talented powerback who is unhappy in his current situation, so could be available. Never know, but like you said probably not.

Still seems like as good a trade partner as any. I would like to see Quinn have success in Buffalo, if he can’t have it here.

"My signature is only one line. You're welcome."

by jaws. on Mar 10, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

So then what? We start Wallace for a year? (Assume Quinn’s gone.) Or do we go out and get a LeFevour-ish player in the draft?

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we still acquire another QB. Lot of time left until the draft.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 10, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

thats the burning question: Trade? Free agent? Draft? Quinn? where will the qb come from?

we’ll have the answer soon probably.

"My signature is only one line. You're welcome."

by jaws. on Mar 10, 2010 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we might end up with two more QBs.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 10, 2010 6:42 PM EST up reply actions  

you said it…Holmgren loves the kid…Lefevour

by Kimble_79 on Mar 10, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

How do you know this? Bross said sort of the same thing.

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

a couple of articles were wrote that I read that he really like the kid…that along with Holmgren and his unique style of finding talent in QB’s that go in lower rounds makes him a perfect candidate. Who knows though, I could be way off???

by Kimble_79 on Mar 10, 2010 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, out of Pike, McCoy, and LeFevour, LeFevour’s the one I’d expect to be drafted.

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

nope, he is after Lefevour!!! I’m tellin ya Holmgren has his eye on that kid

by Kimble_79 on Mar 10, 2010 1:58 PM EST up reply actions  

For some reason, even though he sucks, I kind of don’t want to see Quinn go. I don’t know. I guess I just feel bad for him. He had a lot of potential and wanted to help lead the Browns back to being a playoff contender. Maybe it’s the hometown attachment that I’m a sucker for.

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Kansas City, where Quinn’s college coach Charlie Weis is now the offensive coordinator, would be a sensible landing spot. Broncos coach Josh McDaniels, a former Weis pupil, also loves to trade.

That would actually make sense…

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m with you on that emily….should atleast give the kid a full season to see what he has first

by Kimble_79 on Mar 10, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Sometimes you don’t need to.

by fwembt on Mar 10, 2010 4:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not too sure Brady should get another chance though.

by emily522 on Mar 10, 2010 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

not panicing, just interested. I just can’t wait until all the puzzle pieces fall into place.

Update: James Walker Article about the Browns shopping Brady Quinn.

"My signature is only one line. You're welcome."

by jaws. on Mar 10, 2010 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s all falling into place. The final piece? Who will be our mystery QB?

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 10, 2010 12:56 PM EST reply actions  

I like DA

Always have. I don’t think he’s a bad guy and I’m glad he apologised. I also think he’ll be a good fit somewhere else. Timing was never in his favour at Cleveland and I read his initial petulant reaction as disappointment with how it all ended. Being fired and knowing an element of the fan base never backed you in the first place, at least he was honest about being pissed off. And at least he manned up and apologised for the benefit of those fans who supported him when he was here.

by Terrible Terry Tate on Mar 10, 2010 4:02 PM EST reply actions  

DAnderson shouldn’t have said it, but right about Browns fans. Hope gets chance to muzzle Dog Pound. Made Pro Bowl in ’07! Better than BQ.

- Skip Bayless

When Skip Bayless agrees with you on something, it’s time to end the misery.

by gahnki on Mar 10, 2010 4:50 PM EST reply actions  

I used to hate Skip, but then I realized he doesn’t believe what he says. His job is to get people to hate him so that they watch the show and he does his job well. Most of the people they place across from him are so over their heads it’s laughable. The only option for 1st in 10 was to create a supervillian that everyone watching can hate so they ignore the jibberish coming from the others on the stage.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 10, 2010 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2008/11/30/676084/anderson-sprains-mcl#10387263

This was my recollection of the incident at the time.

I almost forgot how disgusted I was with DA at the time (from my other posts there).

fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com

by Ryan Kelsey on Mar 11, 2010 12:28 AM EST reply actions  

Quinn looked good. I think he looks like a NFL caliber starter that could potentially be great.

Those were the days when we were able to think that…

by emily522 on Mar 11, 2010 12:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Not trying to mock that you did think that, though. So did I. A lot of people on here did.

by emily522 on Mar 11, 2010 12:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I was optimistic. Oh well.

fka "DaytonDogg". Now a contributor to SBN's Dawgs By Nature. www.dawgsbynature.com

by Ryan Kelsey on Mar 11, 2010 12:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for posting this link. I read some of the comments below as well including the stuff that had D’Qwell Jackson’s quote. Reading the Jackson quote makes it seem like the players were disappointed, but he acknolwedges that it was only a small segment of the fans. This is why the Anderson quote pissed me off so much.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 11, 2010 9:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Haha, it’s funny to read again. I was making the same complaints about a few people representing an entire fanbase in that thread.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 11, 2010 9:29 AM EST up reply actions  

At least you’re consistent. By the way, Roger Dorn is now doing a pretty admirable job as a stand up dad in the show Psych. It’s always amusing to me to see him.

by fwembt on Mar 11, 2010 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Interesting, I have not heard of it, so maybe I will check it out.

by Roger Dorn on Mar 11, 2010 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

For some reason i like that show. It’s very goofy and has tons of comedic references.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 11, 2010 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s remarkably well written, I think that helps it a lot.

by fwembt on Mar 11, 2010 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree, i also like how they slip in little funny asides. I’m a big fan of shows that don’t take themselves too seriously.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 11, 2010 7:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Gus kills me.

The Ed Lover “C’mon Son” almost made me pee my pants.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 11, 2010 9:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I was actually thinking of Gus’s little comments. He’s set up to be the straight man but they always give him some good lines to say that if you aren’t paying attention you would miss.

“The only thing she’s guilty of is being awesome.”

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

by Villeslgr on Mar 12, 2010 1:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Guard: “She is overstimulated by color”

Gus: “What about my face”?

Hilarious.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 12, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

Start posting about the Browns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Being-manny_small
Signing Out

Recent FanPosts

Pryor_small
Early AFC North predictions
Jaden_liz_me_small
harrison vs hardesty=hmmmm
Parents_weekend__sept
Interview with C.J. Mosley
Angrydog_small
Ramblings from a storied idiot....
789canon_061_small
One Website's Uplifting Preview of the AFC North....and My Predictions...
Chrishanburgerlegends_small
Cleveland Rocks And LeBron James Career In Hollywood Has Ended
11031_act_small
Rule of 26-27-60 as a tool to determine QB success rate?
Pg2_g_aldavis5_200_small
volunteers
Small
Wide Receivers

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Washington Redskins defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth signs autographs during the NFL football team's training camp and fan appreciation day, Saturday, Aug. 8, 2009, at Redskins Park in Ashburn, Va. (AP Photo/Nick Wass) +2 updates

NFL Training Camps News: Albert Haynesworth Fails Conditioning Test

Photo +8 updates

Free Agent OT Flozell Adams Has Four Standing Offers, Seeking $4 Million

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, Buffalo Bills: Chan Gailey Takes The Reins

More from SBNation.com >


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Awesomeness_small Bernie19Kosar

Dsc00156_small Ryan Kelsey

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Moderators

Pryor_small Buckeye Brad