2010 NFL Draft Projection Results

by gahnki on Apr 24, 2010 6:26 PM EDT

OSUMoneyBall- 4/32 = 12.5%

deemac3248 - 3/32 = 9. 3%

Matt Y.- 4/32 = 12.5%

danvail- 4/32 = 12.5%

golanbatrac- 5/32 = 15. 6 %

rufio- 6/32 = 18.75%

StuckInPA- 3/32 = 9.3%

jaws- 4/32 = 12.5%

AG7- 6/ 32 = 18.75%

Browns Town- 5/32 = 15.6%

gahnki- 3/32 = 9.3%

Bernie19Kosar- 4/32 = 12.5%

B19K gets props for not having Jimmy Clausen in round 1.

sww2109- 5/32 = 15.6%

Kimble_79- 3/32 = 9.3%

Brownie's Year- 4/32 = 12.5%

Brownsyup- 1/32= 3.1%

Brownsyup's randomized theory resulted in only one correct pick, although it was one that no one else had in their list.

As it stands, our Co-Champions are Rufio and AG7! Congratulations on picking 6 out of the first 32. Here are your invaluable prizes:

Feel free to look back at the original picks here. I believe I accurately tabulated the results, but the process was incredibly tedious, so there is a chance I made a mistake.

This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.

Tweet Comment 9 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

Not too bad. I went crazy after the top 10.

by Bernie19Kosar on Apr 24, 2010 6:30 PM EDT reply actions

Thanks for doing all this. It was fun.

Alas, I hate to do this, but it looks like sww2109 also had 6 correct:

(1) Bradford
(2) Suh
(3) McCoy
(4) T. Williams
(6) Okung
(18) Pouncey

by Matt Y. on Apr 24, 2010 10:24 PM EDT reply actions

Darn, I did screw up. Alright, sww2109, I owe you a congratulatory banner.

by gahnki on Apr 24, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions

I wasn’t double-checking you, honest. But I was grading the mocks using an alternate scoring system, and I happened to notice. Do you mind if I post the results as “unofficial” grades in a comment here?

by Matt Y. on Apr 24, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions

Sure, sounds cool.

by gahnki on Apr 25, 2010 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions

Ok, here are some unofficial grades. Here is how I graded:

*5 points: Correct team, correct numerical position
*3 points: Correct team, wrong numerical position; OR, correct numerical position, wrong team
*2 points: Prediction was off by one numerical position; e.g., predicting JPP to the Titans at 16 earned 2 points as he was taken by the Giants at 15.
*1 point: Prediction was off by two numerical positions (Berry to Cleveland at 7 earned one point)
*-1 point: Player was not taken in the first round

Here are the results, assuming I made no mistakes:

AG7: 43 points
Rufio: 32
Brownstown: 32
sww2109: 29
Bernie19Kosar: 27
Brownie’s Year: 24
danvail: 24
jaws: 24
Matt Y.: 24
golanbatrac: 23
Brownsyup: 20
OSUMoneyball: 20
StuckinPA: 16
Kimble_79: 15
deemac3248: 12
gahnki: 12

By this method, AG7 blew everyone out of the water. Besides his 6 five-pointers, he had 4 three-pointers: Davis to the 49ers at 13, Graham to the Eagles at 24, Bryant to the Cowboys at 27, and Matthews to the Chargers at 28.

by Matt Y. on Apr 25, 2010 8:13 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs

I probably got killed by having so many reaches in the first.

by Bernie19Kosar on Apr 25, 2010 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions

Among those of us who had four correct, you had the most points. What killed you was only having your first four correct. You lost 6 points on players not taken in the first round, but that was pretty good; nobody lost less than 5, and two people lost 10. Golanbatrac actually got 25 points by having five correct, but he ended up with only 23 because he lost 10 points for players not taken in the first.

by Matt Y. on Apr 25, 2010 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions