Dawgs By Nature: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Preseason Top 25 Rankings

The 2010 Season in Preview: Optimism VS Skepticism

 

QB

Jake-delhomme-1_medium

 

Optimist:

Jake Delhomme will likely be the starter and if the front office have faith in their 3rd round choice, McCoy waiting in the background to get his opportunity. Jake has had a very successful career. From the 03-04 to the 06-07 season he put up 89 TD's with 58 Int's with a 60% completion percentage. He started off the '07-08 seadon with 8 TD's and 1 Int, but then got injured and sat out the remained of the season. So from past performances and stats alone, JD is the best QB the Browns have had in decades. McCoy is a promising prospect, coming out of a powerhouse programs and being the all-time most winning QB in college history. Seneca Wallace isn't exactly anything to jump for, but he has experience with Holmgren and can be used as a Wildcat option.

Pessimist:

After his injury in 2008, Jake Delhomme has never been the same. He single handily cost the Panthers their playoff game against the Arizona Cardinals by throwing 5 int. Last year he had two 0-4 TD-int games, one 0-3 game and threw 5-15 in outdoor games which is important considering our location. The Panther fans were calling for his head and couldn't wait to get him out of Carolina. Seneca Wallace is an unnecessary player since he can't do anything Cribbs couldn't, and McCoy slipped because he's an undersized spread QB with a noodle arm.

My position - Optimistic. I'm interested in seeing what Delhomme does this year, but worried that he doesn't have the WR targets to make a difference.

Offensive Line

Ol_joe_thomas2_medium

Be scared, be very scared.

 

Optimist

The Browns have the arguably 2 best players in the NFL for their positions: Joe Thomas at LT and Alex Mack at C. The supporting players wouldn't have to be dominant to have an extremely effective line. And with the addition of Pashos and  Lauvao, with the retaining of Womack and Steinbach, the line shouldn't have a problem protecting JD and opening holes for hardesty.

Optimist

To have a truly epic O-Line, there has to be balance on both sides. The Browns let Hadnot go, who was our best guard last year. Steinbach had an extreme uncharacteristically horrible year and was rated by Profootballfocus.com as the second worst guard in the NFL. St. Clair was a liability and Shawn Lauvao's ability is up in the air. Pashos lost his starting position on his old team to a rookie, and isn't considered starting quality anymore to most analysts.

My position - Pessimistic. Yes the LT and C position is shored, but the other positions amongst the line have to be at least serviceable.

WR

Mohamed-massaquoi-catches-pass-in-training-campjpg-ef1b884b81327097_medium

That is actually orange Crisco instead of gloves on his hands

 

Optimist:

The rookies have one year under their belt, Robo has been impressive early this preseason, MoMass had a couple of explosive games last year and we added a WR in Carlton Michell who has extremely high upside. We also got a possible legitimate TE threat in Ben Watson and Evan Moore surprised a lot of people last year.

Pessimist:

Last year the WR's played like their hands sweated baby oil last year; couldn't catch a cold if a sick person sneezed in their faces let alone a ball. None of the WR's posses substantial physical advantages over the defense. None of them have particularly impressive speed, strength, height, jumping ability nor are polished route runners. There is no one available to stretch the field, but yet no one has sure-fire hands that would make them possession type receivers.

My position: Pessimistic. This team will not make it in this division with 3 of the top defenses in the entire league without a better and more rounded WR group. Impossible

Large_jerome-harrison-broncos_medium

 

RB

Optimist

Harrison ended the year on a strong note, dominating his last 3 games and single handily winning those contests himself. The FO added Peyton Hillis, a Denver fan favorite to play FB and change of pace HB. We also added Hardesty who ran all over the SEC. Should be one of the top RB groups in 2010

Pessimist

Harrison had a few good games at the end of the season, but 2 of them but one where against the 2 worst rushing defenses in the league and against a reeling Shittsburgh team. They also came against teams who arguably could care less about winning and more about draft position.

My position - Optimistic. The RB group on this team has ridiculous talent and potential. There is a balance of power and speed, and everyone is young and still learning.

Defensive Line

Shaun-rogers-92-2008-nfl-pro-bowl-afc-197cmt_medium

There is a gun in that helmet, he just doesn't know it

 

Optimist

Rogers may have went down last year, but the team actually performed better with him out of the lineup and replaced with Rubin. The line will be served better with Rubin at the NT position and Rogers using his pass rush ability at DE to get to the QB. Coleman is a solid starter.

Pessimist

The Browns were still the fifth worst in the league at rushing defense. Rogers has his gun charge that will likely get him suspended and Coleman and Mosley aren't anything particularly special. And once again the run defense stunk.

My position - In between. The defense could look good with Geathers but it just all has to come together

Linebackers

Adavissteelerscc_medium

 

Optimist

Matt Roth came out of the blue at bagged 6 sacks in 4 games. The Browns as a whole were 8th in the league in sacks. Many Fans were surprised by the play of Bowens, Trusnik, and Barton. And there is also the addition of Gocong and Fujita. A very deep linebacker core.

Pessimist

The only way the Browns were able to get to the QB was by sending everyone on their blitzes, leaving the secondary exposed and consequently torched for the most part. The Browns don't have a specific player who will consistently wreck havoc on the opposing line, no one to command double teams or put fear in the O-line. Trusnik may have a high motor and good character, but that didn't stop him from playing like crap and getting taken out of plays, as well with Barton. Fujita is a liablity in coverage, and Gocong in unproven. Veikune so far is a waste of a draft pick

My stance: Pessimistic. We have a bunch of serviceable players, 2nd stringers and depth, but no impact players. Roth could possibly be that, but we'll have to see more of him

Secondary

Eazy_medium

Eric Wright ladies and gents

 

Optimist

Eric Wright was solid as usual. McDonald sucked, as usual, but we picked up the #1 consensus CB in the draft, and also a very solid vet CB in Sheldon Brown who Eagles fans were very pissed about giving up. We also drafted TJ Ward who is a tremendous hitter, and Larry Asante in the 5th round. We lost Pool, but retained Elam who was solid in rush defense. It should be a lot better this year as opposed to last

Pessimist

The secondary was pathetic in 09. Whenever a defense gets torched by a rookie on the Detroit Lions you know its bad. You see TJ Ward getting big hits on his highlight films, but you don't see him getting big interceptions. Or big pass deflections. He was an obvious reach, some had him going in the later rounds. Joe Haden lacks instincts and had all of his junior year Interceptions handed to him in a gift basket. The draft team were also divided between him and Kyle Wilson, which means there were some members of the organization who didn't want him. Elam is terrible in coverage, so while our CB could be better, the S play is still shakey at best.

My stance: Middle ground. By grabbing Haden and drafting two safeties with run support strengths, the coaches seems to be installing a defense where the Corners are responsible for being on an island with their WR, and the safeties maybe playing the run more so than playing coverage. The success of this would all depend on how well Wright and Haden are at man coverage.

Poll
How do you feel about the 2010 team
Pessimistic
21 votes
Optimistic
46 votes
Cautiously Optimistic
139 votes
Cautiously Pessimistic
9 votes

215 votes | Poll has closed

This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.

2 recs  |  Comment 97 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I only really disagree with you on QB and OL, but am probably slightly more optimistic than you on the LB’s which I would call adequate.

I voted for cautiously optimistic.

by Roger Dorn on May 26, 2010 6:29 PM EDT reply actions  

I pretty much agree with this stance. I am optimistic about the OL but not particular pessimistic though on QBs and probably a bit less pessimistic at LB.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on May 26, 2010 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Heh. You know, the worst outcome for a pessimist is that they’ll be pleasantly surprised, so typically the need for caution is minimal there. Worried you’re just being a buzzkill?

That's just noise.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on May 27, 2010 3:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nah, I’m just being difficult.

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on May 27, 2010 5:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

I should have known. Well, at least two others have joined you!

That's just noise.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on May 28, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Three others. I still hadn’t voted.

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on May 28, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love the idea of cautious pessimism.

by Roger Dorn on May 28, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

its Evan Moore not Matt Moore, and why is their a picture of Andra Davis for the LB’s? I disagree with the OL, Hadnot our best guard last year? I am what we all should be and thats cautiously optimistic.

by BrutalMovement on May 26, 2010 7:24 PM EDT reply actions  

also Harrison ran all over Cincy early in the year as well, and they have a pretty good front 7.

by BrutalMovement on May 26, 2010 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Matt Moore did surprise a lot of people, but he didn’t play for the Browns.

Scientific research has proven that you lose exactly 5.37 billion brain cells every time you listen to Todd McShay.

by TheRealSlimShady on May 26, 2010 8:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Voted pessimistic – and I am an optimist.

Here are my problems – Jake Delhomme was just terrible last year. Worse than BQ. It would surprise me if he were to become an above average starter at this point in his career. WRs were prolly the worst in the league – I think they will be better , but an average corps would be a tremendous improvement.

Ryan will get the most out of the defense, but other than Big Baby – no real over the top playmaker. I think the team has the talent for 5-11, but I do think Eric and Ryan can squeeze an extra win out of the team.

by realmccoy on May 26, 2010 8:28 PM EDT reply actions  

I think Delhomme is going to surprise a lot of browns fans this year. It’s funny I’m actually positive about someone that everyone else hates.

by The Licensed Pessimist on May 27, 2010 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I do think the Browns new team deserves some major credit – we may actually have real depth at CB, and RB. Much improved over last year.

by realmccoy on May 26, 2010 8:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Nice write up.

I voted cautiously optimistic because of the QB position. I think the Browns have gotten better in many areas: the WR’s, (they’ll will be better just because of more practice), CB, ILB, TE, RB, and right side of the O-Line.

That alone will make the Browns a better team. If we can get anything out of Delhomme, we could be decent.

by Bernie19Kosar on May 26, 2010 8:41 PM EDT reply actions  

I third that

Ya must have rocks in ya head to work in Iraq?
Yeah but at least mine are shiny!

by Suppa Bob on May 31, 2010 7:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good post.

Art Modell gives me a hard one

by gahnki on May 26, 2010 9:28 PM EDT reply actions  

I’ve gotta go with pessimist on WR and QB. Somewherein the middle for everywhere else.

Scientific research has proven that you lose exactly 5.37 billion brain cells every time you listen to Todd McShay.

by TheRealSlimShady on May 26, 2010 10:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Cautiously Optimistic!

Good piece here, love the point \ counterpoint perspective.

That's just noise.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on May 27, 2010 3:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Good writeup. I loved the captions for the pictures.

However, I didn’t see your position on the secondary like you have for every other position. I think you missed that part.

by Buckeye Brad on May 27, 2010 8:32 AM EDT reply actions  

There’s a reason for that, Brad.

Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!

"Turner, at midcourt...inside it, at the buzzer, GOT IT!!!!"

by Andrew Tolliver on May 27, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Cautiously Optimistic vote
QB’s – I’m feeling much better about our QB situation than last year. Delhomme has to prove he still has “it”, but I think he will. With the pick up of Wallace and McCoy, I feel much more comfortable with this group.

WR’s – I’m hoping for a breakout year from Momass and Robiskie to contribute more. I also think Watson will play a pivotal role in red zone scoring.

RB’s – Love every part of where we are with this position

LB’s – I agree with you there. No real impact players. Average with a few above average players. Maybe someone will really step up their game this year

DB’s – Very optimistic. Love the addition of Sheldon and Haden. Ward and Assante I will have to see on the field for my judgment on them. I don’t see teams terrorizing us for yardage like last year through the air.

A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths --- Steven Wright

by Kimble_79 on May 27, 2010 9:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Forgot the DL, I am quite comfortable with our DL for this year. I worry for the next year and year after as players are aging on that line though. But plenty of time to address that in the future.

A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths --- Steven Wright

by Kimble_79 on May 27, 2010 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Also agree with this.

Voted cautiously optimistic as well, meaning I’m hoping for a 7-9 or 8-8 record.

by emily522 on May 27, 2010 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

very nice post, things had been dragging around here lately.

As far as your picks, thats a lot of optimism from you haha.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on May 27, 2010 12:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Hmm… I disagree with a few points.

I’m pessimistic about our defensive line but very optimistic about our linebackers. They performed admirably towards the end of the season as things started to gel and I think that they will carry that momentum into this season with vets and added depth in Fujita and Gocong. Those are two very big signings that a lot of folks outside of Cleveland underestimate in my opinion. Although I will say my ass is still a little chapped because I would’ve rather seen us take Rolando as opposed to Haden. But Haden’s a Brown now and I’m with him.

I’m also more optimistic in regards to our offensive line. I believe that the style of play will lend itself to accounting for what is overall a mediocre line. If we can be successful early in our play calling and mixing it up, I think our line is quite serviceable.

I am pessimistic however about our QB situation, at least to an extent. I’m definitely not convinced Delhomme’s got anything left, but I certainly trust Sherman. I’m not too ticked about it though as I believe that if Delhomme plays poorly, we have a choice almost as good at game management in Seneca Wallace. So I suppose what I’m saying is what we might lack in Game 1 ability we make up for in depth. Which is kind of scary/familiar – allegedly.

All in all though I like the coaching, I think we have very good players in key positions (QB, CB, LT, HB, FB) and I think we have players who will perform admirably in other important spots (LB, TE, S). I certainly don’t think we’re exactly back where we need to be, but I pick out 8 games on this years schedule that we ought to win. I’m particularly excited for the game vs KC, a team that has revamped its defense with young talent. That could be a good litmus test for the rest of the season provided we get by TB with a respectable showing.

So, troy145’s 2010 Browns prediction: 8-8.

Moisture is the essence of wetness.

by troy145 on May 27, 2010 2:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Mostly optimistic about QBs. I think Delhomme plays slightly below his career average (which is way better than what we saw last year for the Browns). I think Wallace throws much better than Cribbs so he does add something, I just don’t trust Daboll to find the balance between gimmicky and unpredictable.

WRs-more optimistic than you but still not to the point that I feel good about them. I think Robo produces much more than last year. From what I can see on film so far, Quinn and DA rarely looked to get him the ball and when they did he couldn’t capitalize on a few plays he is capable of making. Massaquoi and Robo can both be good #2s. We have no #1 on the roster.

I also think Watson makes a huge impact on our offense, even if the numbers don’t show it.

Lastly, having one QB (and a veteran) will make these guys look better. Just from watching film so far, Quinn was not going where he should have with his reads and missing open people, and there was not the kind of chemistry between QB and WR you need to succeed in the NFL.

Honestly, I think I am being optimistic when I hope for a league average receiving corps.

RBs-Hopeful, but I think a lot depends on health.

OL-I think Womack was our best Guard last year. Steinbach needs to rebound to 07/08 form, Pashos needs to prove he is still a legit NFL OT, and everyone else is unproven.

DL-I honestly think we are loaded if we can stay healthy. Robaire Smith was a beast last year once he was up to speed in the system. I think playing Rogers and Rubin together could be awesome. Coleman and Mosley were underrated last year. Age/injuries are my concern.

LB- Roth is very good if he is happy. Fujita and DQ are both good players. My big question is the ROLB spot. Will Gocong be better in a 3-4? Can Bowens replicate last year? Will someone like Bernard catch fire?

CB-we should be good early and very good as Haden catches on. We can match up with different styles of WR and if Eric Wright gets more physical we could be awesome.

S-I think Ward is better in coverage than people think and I think Asante has a chance to be an above average 3rd S/average 2nd. I think Elam is average at best. Mike Adams played surprisingly well under Ryan last year, for being Mike Adams. I think we are bad early and move to about average with the growth of the rooks.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on May 27, 2010 6:07 PM EDT reply actions  

cautiously optimistic

the only areas i have concerns about are WR and S, and i think both of those will come along okay as the season goes on.

if not for the fact that my heart has been trampled by this team so many times in the past, i’d have gone with completely optimistic. i just know better as a browns fan.

by Dawg Nuts on May 28, 2010 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Cautiously optomistic here.

IMO, it all hinges on Delhomme and to a lesser extend the green WR corps. TE should be adequate. If Jake can be servicable to good we have a real shot at .500.

The running game should be able to pick up where it left off last year. We shouldn’t expect 300 yards per game like Harrison did against KC but there is no reason we can’t run for 125 yards + each week, keep the D off the field and open up things for the passing game. We shouldn’t have to ask that much from Jake and the WRs. Hopefully, the run game clicks and we are only throwing it 17 to 25 times per game.

On defense I’m hoping we can claw to around the middle of the pack statistically.

Best case scenario, we run the ball down peoples throats all year, Jake puts in a workmanlike 3000 yd 17 TD 10 INT type year and the defense is solid but unspectacular and keeps the opposition around 20 points per game and we go 7-9 or 8-8.

Provided there is an NFL in 2011 we go after a RT, Pass rusher and big time WR and make a playoff run.

by mgtbfb on May 28, 2010 11:56 AM EDT reply actions  

On offense, think New York Giants circa ’86 thru ’90. Grind it out with a stable of RBs and smart, unspectacual QB play.

by mgtbfb on May 28, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

unspectacual

i like it.

by Dawg Nuts on May 28, 2010 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I need spell check at all times. Typed that at work when I was in a hurry.

by mgtbfb on Jun 1, 2010 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

On offense, think New York Giants circa ’86 thru ’90. Grind it out with a stable of RBs and smart, unspectacual QB play.

Phil Simms was far from unspectactual — he was definitely spectactual at times. He has a case for Hall of Fame — perhaps not the strongest case but it’s hardly out of the question.

by TheDriveStillHurts on May 29, 2010 4:52 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I was referring to their offensive style as a whole, not Simms in particular. Eat the clock, run the ball and keep turnovers to a minimum.

Watched every game that 1990 team played. The Giants were my #2 team behind the Browns as a kid after they stomped on Elway and Co. after the Drive.

by mgtbfb on Jun 1, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think overall we can expect the offense to be better than last year, but how hard is that? There’s potential for a big improvement, but I just don’t know how well all of the pieces are going to fit together.

I’m more optimistic for the defense. Some good players were added to the secondary. I think the biggest improvement will come with getting Rubin and Rogers on the line together. That could prove to be disruptive enough that we won’t have to blitz with as many LBs. At least that’s the way I see it.

by JustBob on Jun 2, 2010 12:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Best possible case scenario everyone stays healthy and we get 7 or 8 wins. I think that its difficult to compare a players abilities in college to what he does in the pros. Troy Polamalu did not get a lot picks at usc, but he seems to have a knack for it in nfl. Its all about fitting into the system that ryan and mangini put together in the seconday, referring to the comments on ward not getting picks and haden having them handed to him.

by lizardking86 on Jun 3, 2010 9:31 PM EDT reply actions  

as far as haden having them handed to him, I firmly believe that this is the case for most interceptions in the nfl. very rarely is it the corner making an outstanding play. generally, it’s just the corner or safety being in the right position and the QB making a less-than-stellar throw.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jun 4, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Haden’s best attribute is his physicality.

by Roger Dorn on Jun 4, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I believe it is a dual thing. if the QB makes a perfect throw, even some of the best CBs will almost never get an INT off of it. however, even on a bad throw, the guy still has to have the instincts to make a play on the ball. some INTs are being at the right place at the right time, but most are a combination of solid CB instincts and a bad QB throw. if the CB doesn’t have good instincts, the bad throw will just be incomplete.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 4, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wrong. Perfect throws beat perfect defense every time.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 4, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not if the receiver quits on his route.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 4, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or if it bounces off the receivers hands.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 4, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought “perfect offense beats perfect defense every time when only a CB, WR, and QB are considered” was a little long.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 5, 2010 1:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

I knew what you meant

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 5, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is the whole ‘irresistable force meets immovable object’ argument all over again.

Colt McCoy... the cure for Cleveland's Eric Berry man-crush.

by dawgtribe on Jun 6, 2010 4:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Chuck Norris dies when the Unstoppable Force collides with the Immovable Object. At least according to one Blizzard GM.

For the love of Joe Thomas.....

by North Coast Flea on Jun 6, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

?

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 6, 2010 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree…thats why I said

if the QB makes a perfect throw, even some of the best CBs will almost never get an INT off of it

maybe you misunderstood what I said. I was saying that a bad throw does not automatically cause an INT. an INT is usually a combination of not a great throw combined with a decent (at least) play by the CB. Even the elite CBs really have no chance with a perfect throw.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 5, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

No, I understand perfectly what you said.

almost never

Not almost never. Never. As in: it isn’t Haden’s fault that he can’t teleport through people’s bodies to intercept balls that are thrown perfectly. As in: even if you completely blanket a guy, there is a place where the QB can put the ball where you can’t get it but he has a shot at it.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 6, 2010 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

also, by definition, a perfect throw can not be intercepted, otherwise it wasn’t very perfect.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jun 7, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

thats true. I said almost never, but I believe it may happen one time out of 1 million, thats what I meant.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 7, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s still exactly the same level of wrongness.

Actively seeking inspiration for a new handle

by danvail on Jun 8, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

?? I am just saying that it could happen but if it does, it is an extreme anomaly.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 8, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

also, by definition, a perfect throw can not be intercepted, otherwise it wasn’t very perfect.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 8, 2010 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I haven’t voted since I choose to be cautiously realistic.

Colt McCoy... the cure for Cleveland's Eric Berry man-crush.

by dawgtribe on Jun 6, 2010 4:32 AM EDT reply actions  

I met Eric Wright in person, and he looks nothing the guy in the picture with guns.

by Simmsinns on Jun 6, 2010 11:18 PM EDT reply actions  

I just now got the reference. I guess “Easy-E” was before my time.

by Simmsinns on Jun 6, 2010 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

This gave me a good laugh.

by Roger Dorn on Jun 7, 2010 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

…Wow.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Jun 7, 2010 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Born 1989, he died before I turned 6.

by Simmsinns on Jun 8, 2010 2:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t worry. I’m in your boat too.

by skipkirk on Jun 8, 2010 2:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

I didn’t know the dude till this post either but I clearly understood it was a poor joke at Wright.

You are very close minded, eh?.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Jun 8, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I actually did (though I am around the same age as you guys) but thats b/c I like Gangsta Rap

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 8, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

it was a poor joke at Wright.

You are very close minded, eh?.

Obviously I knew it was a joke. My misunderstanding of the joke was thinking it had something to do with the guns specifically, or perhaps he thought he looked like him.

It wasn’t until I google’d “Eric Wright” to see if he had some kind of gun issues I had missed that I found the “Easy-E” wiki page and saw that very picture right there.

Still, does that lead you to believe I’m close minded?
(Not that it has anything to do with this discussion whatsoever, but no I’m not close minded. I’m actually quite open minded, and very open to new ideas in most aspects of life.)

by Simmsinns on Jun 8, 2010 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I had absolutely no idea why SB thought that you not knowing who Eazy E was meant that you were close-minded. That seemed like a odd thing to say.

by Buckeye Brad on Jun 8, 2010 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

not 100% of open minded people listen to WC gangsta rap from the 90s

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 8, 2010 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not what I meant.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Jun 9, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I meant close minded as in like, you couldn’t understand the sarcasm. Like everything had to be clear cut, black and white for you, yah know?

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Jun 9, 2010 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

this still doesn’t make sense, poor word choice.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jun 10, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

TJ Ward reminds me more of Roy Williams.

He’s a solid tackler, not really an INT grabber.

But both would help this year.

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Jun 7, 2010 12:52 PM EDT reply actions  

I think he is more instinctive in coverage though than roy williams. I think Mays is much more like Williams.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 8, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mays is definitely more like Roy Williams

I’d VERY much like to see TJ Ward blast a certain Steeler tight end…

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Jun 8, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

or a certain Steeler WR…

A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths --- Steven Wright

by Kimble_79 on Jun 8, 2010 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

yep…but I do see somewhat of a comparison with Williams and Ward but I think ward will end up being better in coverage.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 8, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

or a certain Squeeler QB!

Colt McCoy... the cure for Cleveland's Eric Berry man-crush.

by dawgtribe on Jun 10, 2010 3:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Tidbits about Jake D.

Die Hard Browns fan that lives in North Carolina. My wife and I are both Panthers fans as well as I have lived here since 1999. I’ve seen every high and low that Jake has been through since he started for the Panthers. I was in shock, in just sheer irony, when we signed him this off season, but I’ve since seen the light on him. Three things that I think everyone should know about Jake:
1) This guy is SUPER FIERY. Upbeat, wants to win……and he will let the coaches know about it if he doesn’t agree with things. He’s not timid like who we’ve had in the past. He’s not a sheep like brady or derek either. That makes me excited to see him qb for us right there
2) He wants to right the ship, so to speak with his career. The panthers were an underdog 5 or 6 years ago, just like the Browns are now
3) Everyone complains about his interceptions last year, but in all fairness, the receivers down here, outside of Steve Smith, are no better than who the Browns had this past season. Countless balls were tipped and dropped and alot of those were right place, right time for the defenses.

by Big Daddy Hickman on Jun 9, 2010 3:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, that WR group was kind of a mess...

Aside from a vastly older Muhsin Muhammed, I didn’t really see any help for Steve Smith until the end of the year. That’s not good.

by OBrienSchofieldismyHero on Jun 9, 2010 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haha, someone revoked their rec.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Jun 9, 2010 6:09 PM EDT reply actions  

I think I’m as optimistic as anyone, but did I see that Mack is the best center in the league? What? Yeah he’s good, but the best? Not even close. He wasn’t even a Pro Bowler!

Anyways, I’m quite optimistic about our chances this year and I agree with most of the OP (besides the Mack thing). Our offense should make leaps and bounds if only because Daboll is improving and our defense will have a full offseason to build on their success at the end of last year.

by Legoman0721 on Jun 13, 2010 12:07 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Probowls are nice, but aren’t a useful means of evaluating players (see: Anderson, Derek).

By the end of last year, Mack was playing as well or better than any center in the league. Is it too early to call him the best? Sure. But I don’t see a problem with anyone (especially a Browns fan) looking at how well he played last year and jumping the gun a bit.

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Jun 13, 2010 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

but the best? Not even close.

This is a huge understatement.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Jun 13, 2010 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pro Bowls are at least a starting point. But Mack played very well for, what, 4 games? Jerome Harrison should be the best RB by that logic. And I don’t think Mack outperformed the top centers in the league like Mangold, Kreutz, Jason Brown (despite how horrible the rest of the Rams are) or Jeff Saturday. I admit I didn’t watch all of these guys, but I think it’s entirely too early to put Mack in their class.

by Legoman0721 on Jun 13, 2010 3:41 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

i think you’re right taking the season as a whole into account, but if you look at where mack was at the end of the season its not too big of a stretch.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jun 13, 2010 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

he was solid in the first half though. its not like harrison where it was just 4 great games. it was maybe like 4 great games, 4 pretty good games and the rest were just decent.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 14, 2010 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’d say LP was probably projecting a bit as well. Going forward, we are likely to have one of the best centers in the league. I agree with him.

by Roger Dorn on Jun 14, 2010 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Going forward, I agree. Mack absolutely has the potential to be the best center within a few years. However, he did have bad moments last season. Bungled snaps, a few blown assignments. As it is with most linemen, if you notice them it’s because they screwed up and I remember noticing him several times last year.

by Legoman0721 on Jun 14, 2010 10:05 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

But he’s a Rookie.

And he kicked major ass… as a rookie.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Jun 14, 2010 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well he’s no Joe Thomas, that’s for sure.

Heck, even Joe Thomas wasn’t Joe Thomas until he became Joe Thomas. But now everybody knows he’s Joe Thomas so they try to stay clear of Joe Thomas.

by BrownDawg1409 on Jun 19, 2010 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

you will be pancaked for lack of eloquence.

by Dawg Nuts on Jun 19, 2010 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Joe Thomas was and will always be Joe Thomas.

He is the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.

They gone have to stop sleeping on me one day.. I gotta be one of the best

About 3 hours ago by Eric Wright Cleveland Browns – Cornerback

I understand, as a big daddy come and take my spot type of demeanor?

by mooncamping on May 14, 2010 7:24 AM EDT

by Villeslgr on Jun 20, 2010 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

Start posting about the Browns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Alex-mack_small
Predictions. Let's hear them.
Biggamebob_small
¿So What Do We Think We Know About 2010 Browns?
Grimm_small
Thoughts on Week 1 vs. TB
Clay1_small
"Eagle" Defense (2-5-4)
11031_act_small
Browns OR Buckeyes?
Pygmy_marmoset_small
Expanded Season - Will They or Won't They and Should They
Osueyes_small
DBN Fan League: Draft Recap
Bi_blueguy4_small
Cleveland Browns' New Ring of Honor
101_braylon_edwards_--300x300_small
Browns vs. Rams...The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (or the Ronald McDonald)
Biggamebob_small
Brady Watch

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, New York Jets: Mark Sanchez Bears The Burden Of Expectation

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, New England Patriots: The Tom Brady Factor

FILE - This is a Sept. 27, 2009, file photo showing Arizona Cardinals defensive tackle Darnell Dockett  coming onto the field prior to an NFL football game against the Indianapolis Colts, in Glendale, Ariz.  Darnell Dockett knows there are people who don't like him, even though they don't know him as more than anything but a big, rough football player for the Arizona Cardinals. (AP Photo/Matt York, File) +1 updates

Darnell Dockett Signs Four-Year Extension With Cardinals

More from SBNation.com >


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Alex-mack_small Bernie19Kosar

Dsc00156_small Ryan Kelsey

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Moderators

Pryor_small Buckeye Brad