Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Diego Sanchez and the Dangers of Fame in MMA

Rufio's Playbook: Zone Blocking in the Running Game

It is no secret that the Cleveland Browns were mostly terrible on offense last year.  When I went back and watched the tape of the Cleveland Browns' 2009-2010 offense, I found a lot to talk about.

I decided to start by breaking down what I'd call our staple plays--the plays we ran frequently and with a good degree of success.  Because there is so much to talk about with respect to our specific offense, I will need to talk some about football plays/strategy in general.  I'll try to keep it simple, while still explaining as much as I can about what is/was going on on the field. 

In conjunction with Ryan Kelsey's nice piece on our depth at Running Back, I thought I'd start with the running game.

And with that, we dive in to the zone runs.

Star-divide

Announcers and TV personalities often do a lot of talking about the zone runs, but rarely ever say much.  This leads to a lot of misconception, mystification, and flat out confusion about the zone runs and what the team is trying to accomplish.

Furthermore, there is a lot of talk about "the" zone run or "the" zone-blocking system.  There are no such things.  There are two zone runs that pretty much every NFL team uses as a part of their own offensive system but they are endlessly tweaked.

Here, I will explain the outside zone run and a little of what teams are trying to do when they run the outside zone.  In the next post, I will explain the inside zone run and the Browns' "tweaks".

What are the zone runs?

The "zone runs" or "zone blocking" are the run blocking concepts made famous recently by the Denver Broncos under Mike Shannahan.  The zone runs have been around at least since the glory days of Nebraska's running game in the 1990s and I am sure long before that.

There are two basic zone runs; the inside zone and the outside zone. The easiest way to recognize either is to watch the offensive line's first step off the snap.  When blocking for the zone runs, the entire line will take one lateral step to begin the play.  This lateral (or even backward) step is called the "bucket step".

Outside Zone

This play is designed to go outside, around the TE and is also known as the "stretch" play.  The idea is to get the blockers between the defenders and the sideline, and then to run around the blocked defenders.

Here, we'll be looking at outside zone being run from a 2 back, I-formation set with the defense in a 4-3 Over formation:

11_medium

Before the snap, the line will begin to identify who they will block.  Covered blockers can count on blocking the man in front of them.  Uncovered blockers, highlighted here in red, will be the ones doing the zoning.

03_medium

The uncovered blockers--the LG and the RT here--will be looking to try to overtake the lineman playside (to the called side of the run) of where they are.  In this case, the LG will attempt to get betweeen the NT and the right sideline, and the RT will attempt to get between the DE and the right sideline.  They will have help from the C and the TE in doing this.

To begin the play, the offensive line, TE, and FB will take their "bucket step" to the right. 

 

02_medium

After the bucket step, you see the initial blocks below.  The weakside DE is left unblocked, but we'll talk about this later.  You can see the C and TE begin a double team with the LG and RT.  This helps slow the defenders down because as you can see, the LG and RT have a ways to go to get to their blocks.

05_medium

After the uncovered blockers (LG and RT) overtake their blocks, the C and TE leak up to the second level.  The FB looks for the force defender (the defender looking to set the edge and force the RB back to the inside).  The FB should attack this player's playside shoulder and seal that defender inside.  If all goes as planned, the blockers have sealed everyone to the inside and the ballcarrier simply runs around the defense.

06_medium

"One Cut" Running

In the diagram above, the linebackers stay at home (in their gaps) and don't move much horizontally to run away from the OL.  In fact, there is a lot of movement by the OL and none at all by the defense.  In real life, this doesn't happen.

So what happens when RT can't make it all the way over to overtake the DE from the TE?  Or if one of the defenders goes flying toward the playside sideline?  Let's take a look at this, using the right side of the play.

If everyone can get to their blocks, the play looks like this:

07_medium

Now if the DE sees the TE trying to "reach" him, and flies to the sideline, the TE kicks him out.  The RT, seeing that he can't get to the DE, releases up to get the linebacker in place of the TE.  On the way to the aiming point, the RB notices this and "cuts back" behind the TE's block:

08_medium

Ok, but what if the Sam linebacker flies out to the sideline too?  That's no problem for the offense, as the RT kicks him out as well, and the RB cuts back behind both players.

09_medium

In fact, the RB is free to choose his own gap in the stretch play.  This puts the onus on every defender do his job perfectly to stop the outside zone play--and the running back to have the vision to find the hole.  If one defender screws up, the running back has a cutback lane, and the play is going for solid yardage.
10_medium

One Unblocked

You'll notice above that I only drew cutback lanes on the playside of the line. You remember that DE the offense left unblocked eariler?  Mostly because of him, the running back can't cut back too far.  In an attempt to keep this unblocked DE at home, the offense will send the QB on a naked bootleg fake away from the play:

12_medium

The reason this DE is unblocked is because the DE is the one who is likely responsible for setting the edge on the weakside of the play and turning any runner back into the middle of the field.  If the QB can make him stay wide or hesitate for just a moment, the cutback lanes are clear. 

If the DE is free to pursue down the line and the play is slow to develop, the DE can squeeze the RB's choices of cutback lanes or even tackle him in the backfield:

13_medium

This is one of the reasons a fairly mobile QB like Jay Cutler was a great fit in Mike Shannahan's offense.  If your QB is actually a threat to run, you can have him keep the ball a few times and really keep that DE from closing down on the RB.

What do teams want to accomplish by using the outside zone running play?

1. Move the gaps. 

For the purposes of this post, we'll assume the defense is playing a 1-gapping, base 4-3 defense.  This defense will look to stop the run by assigning one gap between blockers to each defender.  The defender is responsible for not allowing the ballcarrier through his assigned gap.

04_medium

As you can see above, all the gaps are covered.

In normal, straight-ahead running plays, the gaps don't really move much horizontally.  The defenders know where they will be headed to stop any play through their gap.  With the zone plays, the offense moves the gap, making defenders react to this movement instead of attacking, and often putting them fractions of a second behind the offense.

Gaps move:

02_medium

Defense must react:

01_medium

2. Allow running backs to play instinctively and quickly.

Unlike other runs, there is no predetermined gap through which the ballcarrier is looking to run in the stretch play.  The running back has an "aiming point" where he will begin running, but is coached to survey the line quickly, then plant his playside foot and make one cut vertically up the field through the gap of his choice as described above.  He simply runs to daylight; wherever a defender is not fulfilling his gap responsibility, the running back makes him pay.

3. Take advantage of a defense's under- or over-aggressiveness. 

As explained above, if a defense plays too aggressively or not aggressively enough, they lose.  The defense must play with balance and controlled aggression to win.

3. Outrun, out-athlete, and out-maneuver the DL laterally.

Often, teams with lighter, weaker, but more agile blockers are the ones who run the zone runs with a lot of success.  This certainly used to be the case in Denver.  Teams who run the zone runs often can afford to have lighter, more agile players because they are looking to double-team the bigger defenders and spreading the defense horizontally to create running lanes.  This is as opposed to "normal" runs, where the offensive line is trying to push the defensive line vertically off the ball.

 

Cleveland Browns OS Zone Runs

We didn't have as much success with the Outside Zone play as we did with the Inside Zone (breakdown coming soon), but we did still use the Outside Zone play a decent amount.  I'll leave you with screen shots of one instance where we did have success with the play, running it from the wildcat.  This is the normal zone run, only without the handoff:

01_medium

02_medium

Note here that everyone else is still in their stance--the LB is even still making a call--and Alex Mack is already out of his stance and getting in position to block Casey Hampton.

03_medium

You'll notice we do block the DE here.  Because pittsburgh is in a 3-4, the OLB would be the unblocked man.  He is over RB Jerome Harrison in the slot to the right.  Because we don't have a normal QB we have an extra blocker, and Harrison can block his man.

04_medium

05_medium

pittsburgh aggressively flows to the left to stop the play, Cribbs cuts back.

06_medium

Note John St. Clair whiffing on his block here.

07_medium

Harrison still working hard on the backside of the play...

08_medium

...and he manages to slow down/block two defenders (near the ref).

09_medium

Brady Quinn can't quite block the CB, and Cribbs gets tripped up after a nice gain.

Comment 64 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

very, very nice breakdown. Since we didn’t run any zone in high school this is all new to me.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jun 25, 2010 5:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Nice explanation, Rufio. I can’t wait to see the inside zone – I’m trying to picture what would constitute a zone inside, but I’ll wait for your next installment rather than over tax my imagination.

by JustBob on Jun 25, 2010 8:16 PM EDT reply actions  

This is actually a very poorly executed play. Outside zone is designed to be “hole to bounce,” meaning the runningback must decide whether to hit his aiming point or continue outside. The outside zone is not meant to be a cutback play across the center, which is where the inside zone comes in.

Art Modell gives me a hard one

by gahnki on Jun 26, 2010 1:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great breakdown.

Art Modell gives me a hard one

by gahnki on Jun 26, 2010 1:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Simple, concise, easily understood as always.

Recced.

by skipkirk on Jun 26, 2010 6:07 AM EDT reply actions  

I like it. In the pictures though, isn’t the player you refer to as Jerome Harrison actually Lawrence Vickers?

by shep615 on Jun 26, 2010 7:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Vickers is in the backfield with Cribbs. Harrison is blocking on the backside of the play (camera’s right) and comes into the screen after Cribbs cuts back. You can see his blurry #35 below the ref by the NFLHD logo in the image directly under the note about St. Clair.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 26, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ahhhh gotcha. I see it now. Good call :)

by shep615 on Jun 26, 2010 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

You don’t know what you’re talking about, rufio.

It’s not a lie if you believe it.

by Brownie's Year on Jun 26, 2010 10:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Nice post Ruf – thanks.

I have a little bit of heartburn with the zone running plays. To me, there are innovators in the zone run game – they know the details and nuances and are able to build a running game that features blocking so precise that they can basically plug and play with the RBs. Denver under Shanahan and their guru of a line coach (cant remember his name) are the preeminent example of this. Then come a bunch of imitators with varying success. When these imitators run the zone scheme, they don’t have the same success, and then something very funny happens. They tend to lose the physical nature of their run game, and often struggle converting key 3rd and 4th downs.

by realmccoy on Jun 26, 2010 10:50 AM EDT reply actions  

features blocking so precise that they can basically plug and play with the RBs

the misconseption is that they could plug ANY back into that system and do well. yes many did well but there was a certain style of RB. they never went after the RBs with elite speed, but they went after elusive guys who had fluid motion so they could execute that “one cut” perfectly and then when they got into the open field and had to take on a defender one-one-one on the second level, either run over him or make him miss…a lot of what Clinton Portis does(did). Speed never seemed to be that important to them as elusiveness, some power, and vision, and could explode to the hole.

I don’t know if they are still running the Zone in Denver but Moreno is a perfect guy for the ZBS. some power and size, great elusiveness and burst, good vision.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 26, 2010 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think one of the big things that contributed to the success of the zone running game in Denver was the commitment to it.

They built their line for the ZB scheme. Their QBs fit the ZB scheme (even Plummer before Culter). Their RBs fit the ZB scheme. They based their offense around the zone plays and were good at running many series of plays off of the zone looks—both run and pass.

I am not really sure how much Shannahan invented in the zone running game, but he sure as heck committed to it. Think Mike Leach at Texas Tech—he stole a lot of what he does from old BYU offenses, but he commits to the pass. When you do that, you can coach the nuances, you can install many plays that will screw with the things defenses will try to do to beat your offense, and you have time to get all of the offensive players on the same page so that they execute as one.

When you have that type of commitment, you can have depth in your offense. You can have the foresight and the arsenal of plays/adjustments to be able to come into the game with a plan, see the defense’s reaction to your plan, and make an adjustment based on that. Then you can let them figure it out and have something else up your sleeve to pull out once they do.

As you point out, if you are truly committed to the passing game or speed over power, you probably won’t be able to line up and push the other team 4 yards into the endzone. BUT you need to commit to picking up those 4 yards in other ways. I think it is when teams get down near the goal line or have a 3rd and 2 and forget that they aren’t big, physical teams that they get into trouble.

I really don’t think you need to be a guru to run the ZB scheme effectively, you just need to commit to it. Last year, I really believe a lot of our offensive problems stemmed from trying to run everything and running nothing especially well. Jack of all trades/master of none syndrome. I think we started to get beyond this with the running game from about the Chiefs game onward.

Just my 2¢

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 26, 2010 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I couldn’t agree more with this.

I think one of the big things that contributed to the success of the zone running game in Denver was the commitment to it.

This factor will make the England/Germany soccer game today a spectacle, the more talented but perennially disorganised England team vs a German squad that changes formation/ tactics once a millennium (yes they change emphasis according to the players available but the system remains the same).

Sorry for the soccer reference…

(Great playbook post as ever Rufio~ cheers)

Welcome Joe!
Go Seneca!

by LondonBrown on Jun 27, 2010 6:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m routing for the young German team today. Screw the limeys. :)

It’s not a lie if you believe it.

by Brownie's Year on Jun 27, 2010 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow that proved a point didn’t it!

My Scottish blood is to the fore today.

:-)

Welcome Joe!
Go Seneca!

by LondonBrown on Jun 28, 2010 7:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve never really understood what goes on in the trenches, but you did a great job of explaining it. Like you said, a lot of commentators talk a lot about zone blocking, but they never say anything substantial about it. Thanks for the explanation, Rufio.

by Legoman0721 on Jun 26, 2010 1:23 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

the stuff going on in the trenches is a lot more complicated than most people realise.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jun 27, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Excellent post… except two things…

primarily… you offer no explanation of the wide receivers roles in the play. Yet surely the wide receivers ability to block or lead away the corners and safety is hugely important to an outside run. In your photo demo its the CB who made the tackle after Quinn couldn’t block. So where was the WR?

secondly… just a question… even before Nebraska in the 90s the terminology of a “pulling linemen” has been around… isn’t that essentially the same thing? a right tackle “pulling” and running to the left side to make a block for an end run or sweep play.

by Snowcat on Jun 27, 2010 10:34 PM EDT reply actions  

In your photo demo its the CB who made the tackle after Quinn couldn’t block. So where was the WR?

you just answered your own question, remember this was out of the “wildcat”

to your second question, nobody pulled on this play and I don’t think anyone pulls on zone plays in general. Also, tackles wouldn’t normaly pull to the oposite side for a sweep play, they would never make it over there in time. In my experience tackles only pulled to the opposite side on slow developing plays like counters, but sometimes would pull around the tight end on their side on what we called a “fold” block (I have no idea what most people would call it). Maybe NFL offenses are different, but i can’t imagine running a sweep that happens slow enough for the right tackle to make it out to the left, or vice versa.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jun 27, 2010 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sometimes the weakside tackle pulls on the Power runs, but I don’t think you could get away with it in the NFL. And other slow-developing plays such as the counter are the only other ones I know of where the weakside tackle pulls.

But some teams do pull in the Zone runs. I think when Barber III/Maroney were at UM they did it, and I think it was around the Big 12 in the 90s. The Colts definitely do it now, and I think we did it last year, too. They call it a “flex” or “pin and pull”. You will usually see the TE block down and the uncovered OL pulling around him to the strong side. Still ZB principles.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 28, 2010 6:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

ok that makes sense, and that type of pull is what i was referring to as a “fold,” but thanks for the more widely used terminology.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jun 28, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think “fold” is pretty widely used. It is just more specific than “pull”. I think the TE and OT will always/almost always fold, while the inside players may or may not depending on who is covered in that type of ZB.

I think we ran the “pin and pull” against the steelers twice when we won in week 14, once there was a fold and Thomas and Steinbach pulled, once there was not (I think?) as Steinbach and Mack ended up pulling. Both runs were to the left.

Would you guys have called it a fold if the playside OG pulls around the playside OT and TE? Thats where it gets fuzzy for me.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 28, 2010 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

we rarely did that, only against specific fronts, and you see some crazy ones in high school. but every once in a while we would do that and when we did our coach always called it a “fold,” but he also said “like a tackle on a sweep.”

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jun 28, 2010 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

As for the WRs, Their job is pretty much to take care of the corner. If it is man, they probably want to act like they are running a fade or a go and just run the corner off. If it is zone, they should block the corner and try to take them out of the play. If the corner blitzes, the corner is probably the “force” defender and should be blocked by the FB. The WR should then look for the safety.

Usually this doesn’t have a “huge” impact on the run. It is pretty easy to distract/block the corner long enough to take him out of the initial play. Good blocking WRs can maybe take the play from a 10-15 yard gain into a TD (as can great runners), but the success of the play depends most on what happens in the box.

In the screenshots above, we are in the Wildcat, with Quinn out wide so he is the “wide receiver”. I would expect a traditional WR to be able to block better than this, which should have sprung Cribbs for more yardage. I think that’s about what we should expect from a QB playing WR.

Our formation looks like this:

Doing this lets us put Harrison (HB) in the slot, which takes the OLB out of the box. It also means we get an “extra” blocker and now we can block everyone in the box (3DL + 3LB + SS = 7, 5OL + FB + TE = 7).

As to how pulling linemen fit in to all of this…it is pretty complicated. The “bucket step” is NOT the same as pulling, and neither is the “reach block” (the technique the OL use to zone block). Pretty much the only similarity is that linemen are moving horizontally.

For these reach blocks, the linemen really are trying hard to get between the defender and the sideline and to push the defenders back to the weakside. Only if the defense really runs away do the linemen kick them out. Not only that, but all of the linemen are moving, so they never go around everyone, they move horizontally as a unit. Zone left (as in screenshots above):

On a pull, the linemen are looking to go around/behind other blockers. They are almost always looking to kick the defense out first, then turning back inside if there is no one to kick out. Power right (as in screenshots below):

On this (unsuccessful) play, LG Steinbach (#65) pulls to the right. You will see the other OL block down to try to push their players left, while Steinbach looks to kick his out to the right.



In the image above, you can see RG Womack (#77) getting stuck. His job on this play was to help C Alex Mack with the NT, then to get up to block the ILB. Above, he has helped with the NT and is trying to get to the LB but can’t get through the line.

You can see Steinbach (lowest on the screen of any Brown except the WR) and Vickers (immediately behind Steinbach) ready to block two players. But pittsburgh has three at the point of attack: Woodley (on the 15 yard line near Steinbach), and two ILBs (to the right of Woodley close to the hash marks). Womack was supposed to block one of them. He doesn’t, and…

So a pull occurs when a lineman runs around another blocker to make a block, not when the line moves left or right as a unit. I am pretty sure both of these techniques have been around since long before Nebraska’s glory days.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 28, 2010 6:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Holy crap, that comment is really long.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 28, 2010 6:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

It could probably be a Fanpost in it’s own right. Good job as always Rufio.

by Legoman0721 on Jun 28, 2010 12:47 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

this can also be run with the responsibilities of the FB and G switched. the FB would be kicking out and then the guard would lead through the hole.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jun 28, 2010 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, we did a little bit of misdirection there I think; Harrison taking a few counter steps and Vickers running around the QB to the left. So perhaps to call it a “Power” play is incorrect.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 28, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think its still a power blocking scheme, regardless of what the backs are doing.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jun 28, 2010 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right, except as you pointed out the FB and OG’s responsibilities are switched. So it’s either a Counter (image) without the tackle pulling and the FB in his place, or its the Power with a little misdirection.

It really doesn’t matter what you call it, though.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 29, 2010 4:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, without being able to watch the video of the play to see what the backs are doing, the blocking would lead me to believe it’s a counter, specifically what we called a counter tre (or tray? i’ve never seen it spelled), where the FB and tackle switch responsibility.

I hate the steelers the way a mother loves a child.

by notthatnoise on Jun 29, 2010 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow. That was the most complete answer to a question I have ever enjoyed. Thanks so much!
I blew it on the original explanation, thinking the guard was coming around the center, not just sliding onto the center’s block. So thanks for the clarification.
And your further explanation of the WRs role was also spot on. Just because it was “wildcat” didnt explain it, because the play was designed to be run to the WRs side, not the QBs side. It was Cribbs who cut it all the way back with that vision of his. So thanks for including the wide receivers responsibilities too
FANTASTIC post

by Snowcat on Jun 28, 2010 10:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks man, I am glad I could clear it up.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 29, 2010 3:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

agree, very good write up Rufio

A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths --- Steven Wright

by Kimble_79 on Jun 29, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Once again.

DBN – A Cleveland Browns Blog – We Have Rufio, and you don’t.

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Jun 29, 2010 2:51 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

We have roofies and you will always leave feeling satisfied.

by Roger Dorn on Jun 29, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

hahaha

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jun 29, 2010 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

What about Groundies? Because you’re more likely to hit the floor than the roof!

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Jun 29, 2010 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

certainly would be a more fitting name

A lot of people are afraid of heights. Not me, I'm afraid of widths --- Steven Wright

by Kimble_79 on Jun 30, 2010 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

This made me laugh.

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Jun 29, 2010 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even Big Ben can’t say that.

It’s not a lie if you believe it.

by Brownie's Year on Jun 30, 2010 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good Read

I would like to see more of these informative articles. I am interested in the x’s and o’s of the game. That is why I enjoy Bernie doing the commentary on pre-season games.

by DevilDawg56 on Jul 1, 2010 11:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Welcome, Devil.
That’s what’s great about our site. We do things like this. A good few of us know about this knowledge because we grew up on it. It’s not just a sport, it’s a science. Rufio is the main guy and does some very good posts to help the fans.
I started writing a thing last year called "Pulling Guards. The 5 ?’s (Who, What, Where, When. and Why)". But a personal event happened that prevented me from completing it. I pretty much stopped caring. But I still have it (30% finished).

Don’t wait for these posts. If you ever have a question, just ask. There are no stupid questions ABOUT FOOTBALL science around here.

It’s not a lie if you believe it.

by Brownie's Year on Jul 2, 2010 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

bold?

It’s not a lie if you believe it.

by Brownie's Year on Jul 2, 2010 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

why is it bold?

It’s not a lie if you believe it.

by Brownie's Year on Jul 2, 2010 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even your signature is in bold.

For the love of Joe Thomas.....

by North Coast Flea on Jul 3, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would probably say 75% science, 50% art.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jul 3, 2010 3:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

100% science, 100% art.

It’s not a lie if you believe it.

by Brownie's Year on Jul 3, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Man, I never did understand stats.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Jul 3, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

(But I do understand a little HTML code. Goodbye bold!)

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Jul 3, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

BY, if you ever feel like finishing that up I’d love to see it here. The technical posts and conversations on DBN are gold.

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Jul 3, 2010 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

NO! RUFIO PULLED A B19K!

"Spartans never die Jorge. They're just missing in action."

by SpecialBrownie on Jul 3, 2010 1:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Now that’s cool. Posts fine, bolds itself when you you reload the page!

by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Jul 3, 2010 1:36 PM EDT reply actions  

 Anyone know an exorcist? This all started with the words ‘Welcome Devil’.

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Jul 3, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

My bad. I must have summoned Rockland on accident.

It’s not a lie if you believe it.

by Brownie's Year on Jul 3, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I swear I don’t remember altering this in any way since originally posting it. I have no idea where the bold came from.

I have a video embedded in the next post, so it will probably have some sort of Bold/Italics/Strike demon AND take forever to load. Fun times!

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jul 3, 2010 2:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Cease bolding.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Jul 3, 2010 3:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Magic, eh? All you guys had to do was say, “cease bolding,” and all would have been well.

FYI, is wasn’t rufio’s mistake. Somehow a stray <(strong /)> tag got stuck at the end of DevilDawg’s comment.

I fixed it by looking at the issue in Page>View Source Code, and then just putting a closing tag at the start of my comment.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Jul 3, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

We already came to the decision that it was the Devil.

It’s not a lie if you believe it.

by Brownie's Year on Jul 3, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I looked at the source code , but started with BY’s post. Interesting that <(strong /)> would work.

Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Jul 3, 2010 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great. Now I’m the Devil. :(

It’s not a lie if you believe it.

by Brownie's Year on Jul 3, 2010 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can’t tell if you misunderstood what golan said or are making a joke. Golan was saying that when he checked the source code, he began with your post and neglected to check Devil’s.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Jul 3, 2010 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

More Posts

Waiting for the 2nd installment of the zone blocking article. Also would like to see an article on defensive coverages.You created a monster and now he wants fed! I hope you all enjoyed your holiday.I am on vacation in Nags Head,waiting for Aug.14th!

by DevilDawg56 on Jul 6, 2010 11:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Funny-good-times-11_small
DBN Draft Talk Thread #2

Recent FanPosts

Ike_small
2014 Super Bowl Cleveland Browns vs. Detroit Lions.....
Audi_rs4_fullsize_small
A new, improved top 10 to shred.
Nfl_cleveland_browns_1_small
Pick Griffin at 4 or BPA or Trade down
01203_rosewoodcanvas_1680x1050_small
The Day After
01anderson_500_display_image_small
How much longer for our Browns to play in and win a Superbowl?
Small
Are you All In???
01203_rosewoodcanvas_1680x1050_small
If I Were Tom Heckert...
Small
The Manning Saga (Lets make a Deal!)
Audi_rs4_fullsize_small
My bottom five: '11 Browns starters.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

You get 'em Betty. Hat tip to BELIEVELAND.
Browns Are the Best in NFL History!
Someone needs to stop this guy.

Recent FanShots

What Would the End of Football Look Like?
Peyton Manning's face in every logo
The First Super Bowl
Jordan Norwood weighs in on the Browns Unis: @jordaNorwood from a...
Dan Wolf Latest Mock
Cleveland to host Super Bowl?
Top Ten Things Overheard In The New England Patriots Locker Room After The Super Bowl (cut from tonight's "Late Show")
I think that you guys will all enjoy this as much as I did.
@dmdxu: "@darrenrovell SB cookie cake being sold at Giant Eagle in Cleveland (via @fisherbw) twitpic.com/8g4zdz"

This is an awesome Browns related Super Bowl cake!
BROWNS IN SUPERBOWL?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Evilbrownsavatar1_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

Jared_sullinger--300x450_small Buckeye Brad

Small notthatnoise