What to Look For: St. Louis Rams vs. Cleveland Browns
The Cleveland Browns will be playing in front of their home fans today to take on the St. Louis Rams. Cleveland hopes to build off the positives they had last week offensively, as they saw their first-stringers basically put up 21 points on the board against the Green Bay Packers.
Meanwhile, the Rams are trying to rebound from a 28-7 loss to the Minnesota Vikings in a game where they really didn't look too impressive. That was a Vikings team without Brett Favre under center either.
Here are some notes and things to look for in tonight's game against the Rams...
- The Rams' offense was terrible against the Vikings last week. In total net yards, they were outgained by the Vikings 414 yards to 150 yards. If that doesn't get St. Louis fans to turn off their television sets as soon as possible, then I don't know what will. The Rams would have been shut out had they not returned a punt 93 yards for a touchdown late in the first quarter.
- I knew the Rams had Sam Bradford and I knew he wasn't supposed to start this season, but I couldn't recall who they brought in to replace Marc Bulger. It turns out that they brought in veteran A.J. Feeley. It's been a mixed bag career for Feeley, but overall he's shown to be a serviceable backup but not a reliable starter. Nonetheless, he'll be the player under center against the Browns' defense for a good portion of the first half.
- The media is promoting this game as the one that'll feature Sam Bradford vs. Colt McCoy, but don't expect them to be in the game at the same time. Like the Browns, the Rams featured four quarterbacks last week. Since McCoy got more playing time than Brett Ratliff last week, the two are probably going to swap spots this week on the depth chart. Unless Bradford plays into the fourth quarter, he and McCoy will have to be evaluated separately.
- I'd like to get a look at all of the Browns starters in action, but it wouldn't surprise me if guys like Mohamed Massaquoi, John St. Clair, Tony Pashos, and a few others are inactive for the sake of being cautious. The third preseason game is still considered the most important, so Mangini might wait until then to play everyone.
- Although Steven Jackson should be good-to-go for the regular season, he might not play against the Browns tonight. The Rams already rested him in their first preseason game after Jackson had surgery on a herniated disk in the preseason. If Jackson doesn't play, the Browns' first-string unit on defense should not have any issues stopping the Rams' backs, Kenneth Darby and Chris Ogbonnaya. The Rams' depth behind Jackson is probably among the worst in the NFL.
- The Rams' offensive line was a major reason the team went 1-15 last year. The team features some youth at several positions, including Rodger Saffold at left tackle (No. 33 overall in 2010) and Jason Smith at right tackle (No. 2 overall in 2009), but it's still a group that our pass rushers should have some more success against than we did against the Rams. Last week, Rams quarterbacks were sacked six times, including four sacks against Bradford. Former Brown Hank Fraley should be the team's backup center on the second unit.
- Enough about the Rams. The Browns' first-teamers are scheduled to play most of the first half, according to head coach Eric Mangini. Mangini says that backup quarterback Seneca Wallace will also get some work with the first-team offense though. My prediction is that Delhomme will work the first quarter and one series in the second quarter, with Wallace coming in after that.
- I think we'll also see the debut of the Cyclone formation today against the Rams since the first-string offense will have more time on the field together. It probably won't be anything too flashy -- maybe a direct handoff to Joshua Cribbs -- but I think the coaching staff will want a little bit of footage on how other teams react to how certain players line up.
- I expect to see Eric Wright in the starting lineup tonight after missing last week's contest. The Rams aren't exactly deep at the receiver position, but I'd still like to see how Wright performs as the nickelback when those situations come up.
- Fans have to be anxiously awaiting an encore from rookie safety T.J. Ward. He made some great plays last week, but he's made it known that he needs to focus on wrapping up better at times (see the touchdown by John Kuhn last week.
- I was watching the Bengals' defense in awe last night, as they consistently brought only five players and were able to get in the face of the Eagles' quarterbacks almost every snap. I'd be encouraging to see the defensive line get a better push on passing downs this week, just to see if our pressure last week was only negated thanks to how good the Packers are.
- I'll be glued to who Mangini announces as the starting four linebackers today. We heard about Marcus Benard (OLB) and Scott Fujita (ILB) being part of the changes on the line in practice. I'd like to get a look at Benard against the first-stringers, since we know he does pretty darn well against the second- and third-stringers.
- Punter Reggie Hodges knows that he has the starting role now, so consistency will be the key. We can't expect him to be anywhere close to a Pro Bowler, but he also can't be averaging one shanked punt per game. If the Browns' offense is better this year, he might get some more opportunities to pin teams back inside the 10-yard line, something I have a feeling he's actually not too bad at doing (with some help from our coverage team).
- We're still waiting for one of the Browns' receivers after the first four (Massaquoi, Robiskie, Stuckey, Cribbs) to shine. I'm still holding out hope that Bobby Engram will claim that role, but if the team is looking for upside in their youth then it is between Syndric Steptoe, Carlton Mitchell, Jake Allen, and newcomer Taurus Johnson. We haven't had much exposure to Johnson, so if he suddenly has a dominant game when McCoy plays with him, perhaps he could end up being a dark horse.
- It could get ugly on the right side of the offensive line, but Mangini has not ruled out the possibility of John St. Clair, Tony Pashos, and Shawn Lauvao playing. Lauvao wasn't injured; he reportedly went to Hawaii to tend to personal issues. Pashos and St. Clair were a little banged up, but St. Clair returned to practice Thursday. If none of the three players can go, we'll see Billy Yates at right guard and Scott Kooistra at right tackle. Kooistra served as a right tackle for the Bengals for seven years. Either way, the right side will have their hands full with the Rams' Chris Long.
- Playing at home against a team that was 1-15 last year and struggled in their first preseason game should mean that the Browns are well-favored to win this game. I know anything can happen in the preseason, but if the Rams' first-string unit is not very talented, then it's hard to believe their second- and third-stringers are very talented either. I'm expecting this to be another confidence booster for Cleveland, although it'll be hard to replicate how efficient we were offensively early on last week.
- Turf Show Times, our Rams affiliates, has a couple of primers up on the game:
Preseason Game 2 @ Cleveland, Position Comparison
Rams vs. Cleveland: What to watch, who to watch, and other thoughts
Feel free to share your own notes on what you're looking for in tonight's game. For your information, the official game thread will go live at 4:30 p.m EST, three hours before the game begins at 7:30 p.m. EST.
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
thanks for writing this up. i was curious what to look for in tonight’s game.
so, it’s more about us… who will we use? who will stand out? Have we risen enough where we can dominate a ‘lesser’ team?
it’ll be interesting to see how we perform tonight…if we take another step forward…. or take one back…
by discoinferno083 on Aug 21, 2010 1:09 PM EDT reply actions
Looking forward to tonight’s action, excited to see if Delhomme and Wallace can continue to look legitimate, would also like to see us work up a dominating rushing attack. Also, a small appetizer-sided order of Josh Cribbs please, not of course to evaluate his talent but just because he’s so damned enjoyable to watch. Go Dawgs!
by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Aug 21, 2010 1:25 PM EDT reply actions
Internet Coverage
I tried to watch the game on internet lasy weekend, I did get the game but transmission was unstable. When the game was on, it was really on, good pix, good color good audio.
When it was off, it was off!.
Can anyone help with this? TIA
I split my time last week between channelsurfing.net and atdhe.net last week. It wasnt bad. Best I can expect for free coverage while living in Florida.
by LiveandDiefortheDawgPound on Aug 21, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks Dawg Pound, appreciate it. you anticipated my question about having to pay. Can I ask why you split coverage. Was one the browns telecast and the second for Green Bay?
Or were both channels bad so you were constantly switching?
atdhe was fuzzy, but it was the browns broadcast. channelsurfing was crystal clear, but it was the green bay feed, and it cut out part way through.
I have been complimented many times and they always embarrass me; I always feel that they have not said enough.
by notthatnoise on Aug 21, 2010 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions
channelsurfing also drops the coverage at halftime since its actually part of the atdhe company. Told me it was goign offline and to watch the rest of the game at atdhe.
by LiveandDiefortheDawgPound on Aug 21, 2010 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Im really looking forward to tonight. I expect the Browns first teams to really do well tonight. After how we fared against the Packers last week, we really should handle this Rams team tonight.
Two things I am looking for tonight:
1. More Jake Delhomme. I know I shouldnt hope for this but I would like to see him toss an interception tonight and see how he comes back from it.
2. More maturity from our secondary. Id still like to see Ward bring the pain tonight but I would also like to see how he fares in coverage against average WRs. Last week he wasnt bad but that doesnt cut it with the Packers recievers.
Honorable Mention: Lauvao. I want to see alot more of this young guy. He seems like he could be a solid guard as he matures. Im not expecting Joe Thomas like talent from him but I do expect him to be good and make our line as a whole much better.
by LiveandDiefortheDawgPound on Aug 21, 2010 2:10 PM EDT reply actions
only one being in history has had Joe Thomas like talent.
I have been complimented many times and they always embarrass me; I always feel that they have not said enough.
by notthatnoise on Aug 21, 2010 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think Lauvao is playing. As far as I know, he’s still in Hawaii dealing with “personal issues.”
. . . says the man from Columbus.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 21, 2010 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I’ll be looking for some Veikunage. And taping the game, just in case.
Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.
I’d like to see Veikune get some time in as well.
"My mother always told me: ‘You will see the light of people when they hit adversity. You’ll get a good sense of their character." - Ironic words from LeBron James
For the love of Joe Thomas.....
by North Coast Flea on Aug 21, 2010 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Personally I want to see domination tonight. The Rams have only 2 players that should give us any concern, Long and Jackson. If we do not look to be outmatching them, my concerns for this year will increase. In this game I do expect a marked improvement from our valuable rookies (Ward/Haden). Anyway counting down the minutes…
"Let your Cleveland hang out!!!" *tm
Looks like some Rams fans believe they have the advantage in every facet of the game:
Link.
Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.
hehe
It’s not a lie if you believe it.
by Brownie's Year on Aug 21, 2010 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Wow these guys are smoking something heavy. Did they even bother to watch the first preseason game.
We go by Packers and won even with Rodgers playing like a monster, they got crushed by the Vikes without Farve. Do they really think they stand a chance? I would be 100% surprised if the Rams dont pick in the top 3 next year.
by LiveandDiefortheDawgPound on Aug 21, 2010 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions
interesting.
Maybe when then Rams start being honest with themselvesm they’ll actually start to improve.
by discoinferno083 on Aug 21, 2010 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions
wow…some terrible, biased, crap, pseudo-journalism…and i am not just saying that b/c its anti browns.
somehow, even though we were the worst in the league against the pass, picking up joe haden wasn’t the best move b/c it was a ‘luxury pick’. We also “couldn’t get to the QB” last year but still managed to be top 10 in the league in sacks.
this basic disregard for actual facts makes me ignore the rest as garbage.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
I appreciate Male Beauty
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
I’d love to see us…at some point… develop a ferocious pass rush.
If we were to try various blitz schemes, this would seem like a great game to try things.
by discoinferno083 on Aug 21, 2010 3:40 PM EDT reply actions
they aren’t going to show anything too complicated in the preseason. they’ll probably bring a lot of blitzes, but they will also probably be pretty simple.
I have been complimented many times and they always embarrass me; I always feel that they have not said enough.
by notthatnoise on Aug 21, 2010 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Lets just hope they arent as telegraphed as that CB blitz Haden gave away. I saw it at home and called it, Rodgers say it and threw a touchdown.
by LiveandDiefortheDawgPound on Aug 21, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions
The NFL will get their fun with Bradford this year, but next year it will end. I hate Oklahoma, but that guy will be one of the top 5 QBs in the NFL with 2-3 years. He has it all – the size, the accuracy, the athleticism, and the arm strength. I would have given your left nut to trade up with the Rams for him.
Note to Bill Byrne "Because you aren´t Texas and you´ll never be Texas"
But you wouldn’t give up your own…
by Dawgs Bite Back on Aug 21, 2010 6:13 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He’s one of those slim shadey guys
It’s not a lie if you believe it.
by Brownie's Year on Aug 21, 2010 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions
What’d he get? $50 million guaranteed? It’s probably better to wait a year and see how things shake out. If there’s a rookie wage scale, franchise quarterbacks get a hell of a lot cheaper next year.
Dawgs By Nature -- where Hitler, apparently, 'did some good things'.™
Just curious. Why do we care about the money? No salary cap. Hell, Lerner has more money than God just by being the winner of the lucky sperm lottery. Let him give up a few large – I could care less.
Note to Bill Byrne "Because you aren´t Texas and you´ll never be Texas"
That $50 million is for six years (I believe) so it will certainly matter when the salary cap comes back next season.
. . . says the man from Columbus.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 21, 2010 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions
and if the NFL gives up the salary cap they’re stupid.
I have been complimented many times and they always embarrass me; I always feel that they have not said enough.
by notthatnoise on Aug 23, 2010 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Bingo.
And of the players give up the salary cap, which includes a salary floor, they are dumb as well.
by Bernie19Kosar on Aug 23, 2010 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions
I would be very surprised if they did not accelerate a good chunk of that into this year’s cap number.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by 




















