Getting to Know the Enemy: Windy City Gridiron Talks Jay Cutler, and the Bears' Defense
I was pleased to be joined by Dane from Windy City Gridiron, our Chicago Bears affiliate, to preview Thursday's game. Enjoy!
Chris: "The Bears brought in Mike Martz as the team's offensive coordinator this offseason. This preseason, has the offense shown any sign of improvement in terms of playcalling?"
Dane: "We haven't seen too much "Martz-type" playcalling yet in the first three preseason games, mostly due to trying to get the OL settled, as well as trying to develop a good rhythm between Cutler and the Gang. No doubt that installing the Martz offense is very complex, so using the preseason to stick with the basics is not surprising."
Chris: "I've never been a fan of Jay Cutler, and I think the media is partially to blame for that because they used to hype him as being an elite quarterback when he had yet to officially break that barrier. Are Bears fans supporting Cutler as their quarterback, or are they wishing they had someone else under center?"
Dane: "Jay Cutler has all of the physical tools, as well as the football intelligence, to be a truly elite QB in the NFL. People love to look at Cutler's demeanor and form an opinion of his capabilities based on that, but that's not very logical. What we seem to have right now is a gifted QB with a poor OL... not a very good combination. He has plenty of time to develop (remember, he's still young), as long as we can keep him off his back. The Chicago fanbase is still very supportive of Jay, but recognize that other things will have to change to see him have success."
Chris: "It seems like it's been awhile since the Bears' defense has been dominant. With Brian Urlacher returning and Julius Peppers arriving, what are the expectations for the defense as a whole this year (i.e. average, elite, poor)?"
Dane: "Great question. We recently had a discussion on WCG about the keys to our defense becoming dominant again. The upside is that we've got the talent to get there. The downside is that our success largely hinges on one or two players. All eyes will be on Urlacher and Peppers, but Tommie Harris may end up being the guy that matters the most. Our entire defense is based on the ability to A) rush the passer, and B) to have a disruptive 3-technique DT in the middle.
Look at it this way: If Tommie Harris can be truly dominant in the middle (he is supposedly 100% healthy for the first time in a few years), he will draw double teams. If he draws the double team, Peppers is freed up 1-on-1. If the pass rush is there, our LBs can cover underneath, and our DBs can do their jobs a whole lot better. BUT, if Tommie doesn't dominate, Peppers gets the double team, and the pass rush is limited. We do not have the talent in our secondary to sustain coverage downfield."
Chris: "Tell us about an underrated player on the Bears that might make the Bears' 53-man roster but Browns fans might not know about?"
Dane: "He's not underrated to Bears fans, but most teams do not know about the awesomeness of Tim Shaw. He's a backup linebacker who was an absolute beast on kickoff and punt coverages last season. A true tackling machine, and definitely someone to watch when he's on the field. Honorable mention: LB Brian Iwuh. He spent his first 4 seasons in Jacksonville as a backup, and was signed in Chicago this May. He's had a great offseason, and has the potential to be every bit as disruptive as Tim Shaw."
Chris: "I understand bias might be involved here, but take your pick between these two players: Joshua Cribbs or Devin Hester."
Dane: "Completetey biased, with the refusal to be objective: #23 is the man."
Once again, I'd like to thank Dane for taking the time to answer this questions.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’ll take his refusal to be objective as an admission that objectively, Cribbs is better.
I have been complimented many times and they always embarrass me; I always feel that they have not said enough.
by notthatnoise on Sep 1, 2010 4:59 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Yeeeeeeeeeeees!
"My mother always told me: ‘You will see the light of people when they hit adversity. You’ll get a good sense of their character." - Ironic words from LeBron James
For the love of Joe Thomas.....
by North Coast Flea on Sep 2, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions
wtf? #16 > #23
It’s not a lie if you believe it.
by Brownie's Year on Sep 1, 2010 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions
I am not an expert of the Bears’ defensive scheme specifically, but I am pretty sure the 3 tech is not supposed to draw double-teams in most Tampa-2 systems. It is also no lock that Peppers is one on one if Harris does get the double team because backs and TEs can block too.
From what I’ve seen from the Bears, they do need their front 4 to generate pressure, but they love to show blitz with Urlacher and someone else (particularly both LBs crowding the line in the A gaps) and then drop at least one of them into coverage. In BoB schemes, this forces the Center and/or another player to make sure the LBs aren’t coming, giving players like Harris and Peppers time to penetrate before they see a double team.
When the OL stops respecting the LBs as rushing threats, they can be sent on delayed blitzes and you have a little cat/mouse game going on.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
The Cover-2/ Tampa-2 defense is certainly our base defense,
but we also run different variations of the 4-3 throughout the season. With Tommie Harris, his job is not necessarily to draw double teams, but when you’ve got a guy as dominant as he can be (and has been in the past), he does draw the double quite frequently.
As far as the LBs blitzing, that is something that has been stimied in Chicago over the last 2-3 seasons. Our LBs are going to be more responsible (in the passing game) for covering the flats and the underneath routes. Like you said, the front 4 should be generating the pressure.
And in your scenario where Tommie is being doubled, and Peppers is having two kicking him out, it opens up a huge opportunity for our other DE, Idonije or Anderson, to make a play, and to allow a LB to come free.
In an ideal world, considering how the last couple of years have gone, I’m hoping the front four are able to wreak all the havok, and just let the LBs play mop up. I can’t tell you how many of our LB blitzes (typically never delayed) have actually gotten through, but it hasn’t been that many.
Thanks for the feedback rufio!
You will definitely see blitz shown
The Bears employ that quite often, bringing in 1 if not 2 LBs close to the center to show blitz. Urlacher drops into coverage from that position quite often but has been known to actually blitz.
But this is preseason so how much blitz scheming is actually be done might be minimal. As well, the Browns and the Bears will probably be resting most of the starters also.
But this is preseason so how much blitz scheming is actually be done might be minimal. As well, the Browns and the Bears will probably be resting most of the starters also.
This is true. It is also game 4, where the starters play the least and the gameplans are the least like the regular season.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
No mention of the running game?, Forte and Chester Taylor, they are both excellent receivers, and may be used in an M Faulk kinda way. If this wasnt the preseason I would say out LB’s are in for a long day.
Go Browns!! 5-11 2010 then the winning begins in 2011!
We are very excited to finally have a legitimate RB to split time with Forte.
During his rookie season two seasons ago, Forte ran the ball 1.6 million times. He looked great doing it, but we also know that type of Pace could not possibly continue. We thought last season we had a good #2 in Kevin Jones, but the guy ended up on the IR.
It didn’t help that Forte also played with an injury all last year, and behind a very ungood OL.
This year, Forte has got his sexy back, and we’ve seen that familiar speed and shifiness that we knew he had. Throw in Chester Taylor, and we have a very legit 1-2 combination.
The biggest question is: Can the OL not suck this year?
In unrelated news,
I have no idea why I capitalized ’Pace." Perhaps I was already thinking about our very terrible OL last year. (Pace… terrible OL… get it?!)
I can't believe Cribbs was considered the second best athlete in Cleveland.
LBJ. Lying. Backstabbing. Jackass.
by SpecialBrownie on Sep 2, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions

by 
























