Statistically Speaking: Reggie Hodges' Outstanding Season
While the season is still somewhat fresh in our minds, during the rest of January, I will be sprinkling in some posts that are subtitled, "Statistically Speaking," highlighting interesting statistical notes and comparisons regarding individual Browns players, or the team as a whole.
Today, I'm starting with the tremendous season that punter Reggie Hodges had. Despite Hodges' breakout season and drastic turnaround from a year ago, it didn't seem like he was even considered for the Pro Bowl. Let's take a look at how Hodges' performance improved from a year ago, and how he compared to the rest of the punters in the NFL.
The best thing about Hodges' performance for me during the 2010 campaign was the fact that he did not shank any punts -- there were no "Derrick Frost" moments. Hodges' punt average in 2009 over 8 games was 39.8 yards per punt. If he would have done that in 2010, that mark would have ranked worst in the league. Instead, Hodges improved his average to 43.9 yards per punt, an improvement by 4.1 yards per punt. That average was good for 14th in the NFL, and 7th in the AFC. Here are some other statistics for Hodges this year:
Punts Inside the 20 yard line: 29 out of 78 (37% of the time), good for 8th in the NFL and 5th in the AFC.
Punts Inside the 10 yard line: 15 out of 78 (19% of the time), good for 3rd in the NFL and 3rd in the AFC.
Number of Touchbacks: 5 for the season, and he didn't have a single touchback after Week 5.
The key statistic here is the number of punts inside the 10. Consider that many of Hodges' punts came when he was a little more backed up, meaning he had less opportunities to punt the ball from near mid-field. When he did have the chance to pin a team back, he executed -- hence the lack of touchbacks after Week 5.
Hodges' contributions go beyond punting. He ran a beautiful 68-yard run on a fake punt against the New Orleans Saints, and he also grabbed two high snaps from Ryan Pontbriand on field goal attempts for Phil Dawson during the regular season.
The Raiders' Shane Lechler was voted to the Pro Bowl from the AFC. Lechler had a higher punt average than Hodges (47 yards per punt). However, despite Lechler having 27 punts inside the 20, only 8 of those punts fell inside the 10. Again, other variables come into factor (i.e. maybe the Raiders always punted from a little further back, or maybe the coverage units had a harder time chasing down returners since the kicks were longer), but the Pro Bowl nomination can be attributed to Lechler having more experience as a starting punter.
In the end, it's difficult to argue that Hodges should have gotten the Pro Bowl nomination over Lechler. Not only are Lechler's statistics at least somewhat comparable to Hodges, but two other punters from the AFC -- the Jets' Steve Weatherford and the Ravens' Sam Koch -- both had slightly better numbers than Hodges.
It was a great season for Hodges, a 6th round pick by the St. Louis Rams back in 2005, but he doesn't need the Pro Bowl nomination -- all that counts is that he became a reliable punter this year who can help us pin opponents back in the future. Maybe next year our defense will actually capitalize on Hodges' "greatness" so he won't need a 68-yard run to be recognized by others around the league.
25 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I forgot to add that Hodges did well enough that the team cut ties with the more experienced (but injured) Dave Zastudil.
Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.
Fortunately, that’s not the case with the Browns. . . considering that we have Joe Thomas, Alex Mack, Eric Steinbach, Peyton Hillis, Joe Haden, Shaun Rogers, Ahtyba Rubin, TJ Ward, Scott Fujita, and Ben Watson.
If you don't respect Aaron Laffey, I will fight you.
by Cap'n Snegiryov on Jan 5, 2011 10:33 PM EST up reply actions
You forgot Dawson, McCoy, and Cribbs.
Your friendly neighborhood Mangini apologist.
by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2011 11:43 PM EST up reply actions
He is truly the only guy I’m happy to see replace and 1-up Zastudil.
By the way, you forgot to mention the fact the he managed to sneak into the Sugar Bowl Tuesday night and put on a Razorbacks uniform. He was trying to get back at us for the lack of Pro Bowl voting. As I mentioned in the AtO gamethread, I son’t blame him.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Oh no. We are talking about our awesome punter again. This usually means the rest of the team is really awful. Maybe that is a great reverse barometer of football suckitude… the more you talk about your great punter the worse your team sucks. ;-)
Brownsyup
I realize the self-deprecation here, but special teams are vital to winning games. I hope to god next season we have more to talk about besides the excellent special teams play, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t important.
chris, this is great, and i look forward to these breakdowns throughout the month. while this post may not get a ton of comments, i think it’s one of the better ones (among a sample of consistently really good posts) to show up on the site in a while. sifting through the nuts and bolts of what went right, what went wrong, and how we ended up where we are is a great exercise.
Wallace’s contract is up, Delhomme is due something like $11Mil next season. The number could be wrong but the point is he’s under contract.
Your friendly neighborhood Mangini apologist.
by North Coast Flea on Jan 6, 2011 8:48 PM EST up reply actions
the number is way wrong, but you are right that he has a contract for next year
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 6, 2011 9:00 PM EST up reply actions
"Statistically Speaking" is right
My view on Hodges is that he’s a major downgrade from Zastudil and Gardocki. What Hodges fails to do time and again is turn over field position. I don’t know how many times he had to punt from inside the Browns’ 20 and the other team would get the ball at mid-field. His long punt for the year ranked him 29th, which says to me he doesn’t get many out there, which is too bad with the Browns’ excellent coverage team.
As for his inside-the-20 and inside-the-10 stats, how much does that matter with the Browns’ bend-but-don’t-break defense, which was designed to give up yards but not points?
It’s a lot easier to BbDB when the other team has 85-95yds to drive rather than just 40-50.
Your friendly neighborhood Mangini apologist.
by North Coast Flea on Jan 7, 2011 2:31 AM EST up reply actions
As for his inside-the-20 and inside-the-10 stats, how much does that matter with the Browns’ bend-but-don’t-break defense, which was designed to give up yards but not points?
the defense literally has nothing to do w/ the fact that these stats were great for hodges. nothing.
by DontCallMeJoey on Jan 7, 2011 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
He also knows how to make a cut move it would seem.
Your friendly neighborhood Mangini apologist.
by North Coast Flea on Jan 8, 2011 2:17 AM EST up reply actions
I’m glad you’ve brought these segments back, Chris, they are very insightful. I think Hodges turned in a solid body of work this season, but I agree he did not warrant a Pro Bowl selection. His number were good but not great, the NO game notwithstanding. I think his most valuable contribution to the special teams unit was his consistency—in other words, he was a “known quantity” for the coaching staff. His kicks may not have gone the farthest, but I can’t recall any truly bad kicks. Having confidence that your punter will give you X amount of yards, every time, is probably more useful from a strategy standpoint than knowing your punter CAN kick it 80 yards, but may occasionally shank it 15 yards.

by 



















