Why The Defense Is Ahead Of The Offense
First of all, don't call Heckert fat.
To be honest, I don't care if Heckert ends up being 1,000 pounds, as long as he keeps hitting on draft picks.
I know that the Browns offense has been bad the past two weeks. In fact, it has been really, really bad. But I am a glass is half full kind of guy now. I want to talk about the defense.
In case you haven't looked, the Browns defense is ranked 4th in the NFL! Seriously! Don't get me wrong, I think ranking defenses by yards isn't the smartest thing in the world, but even going by points, the Browns rank 8th in the NFL.
So why is the Browns defense playing so well, while the Browns offense is playing so poorly? It's pretty simple, it's because of Heckert.
I wish I could take credit for this idea, but I can't.
Someone, and whoever you are please take credit, (I searched through four different threads and could not find the comment. I want to say DawgNuts or TDSH?) made what should have been obvious to me, but it wasn't.
The Browns and their new front office, for all the hub-a-baloo about being offensive masterminds and coaches, have done a major reworking on defense.
When you break it down, it's shocking at how quickly, and effectively, this has been done.
LDE: Jabaal Sheard: 2nd round draft pick by Heckert and Holmgren (H&H): 22 Years Old (YO)
DT: Phil Taylor : 1st round draft pick by H&H: 23 YO
DT: Tuba Rubin : 6th round pick by Savage (All praise be to Savage): 25 YO
RDE: Jayme Mitchell: Acquired in trade by H&H: 27 YO
OLB: Scott Fujita: Free Agent Signing by H&H: 32 YO
MLB: D'Qwell Jackson: Drafted 2nd Round by Savage (All praise be to Savage): 28 YO
OLB: Chris Gocong: Acquired in a trade by H&H: 27 YO
CB: Joe Haden: 1st round draft pick by H&H: 22 YO
SS: TJ Ward: 2nd round draft pick by H&H: 24 YO
FS: Usama Young: Free Agent Signing by H&H: 26 YO
CB: Sheldon Brown: Traded for by H&H: 32 YO
In two years, H&H have replaced 9 starters, seven who are under the age of 27. It's a young nucleus that has a chance to completely change the face of this franchise.
The front office has used high draft picks and used free agent money on this side of the ball. Big time currency. It has passed on high end offensive prospects (Julio Jones, CJ Spiller, etc.) to build up on defense.
It has been a focus.
Then you look at the offense. What has H&H done to improve the personnel on that side of the ball?
QB: Colt McCoy: 3rd round draft pick: 25 YO
RB: Peyton Hillis: Acquired through trade by Kokinis H&H: 25 YO
RB: Montario Hardesty: 2nd round draft pick: 24 YO
FB: Owen Marecic: 4th round pick by H&H: 23 YO
WR: Greg Little: 2nd round draft pick by H&H: 22 YO
WR: Mohammed Massaquoi: 2nd round draft pick by Kokinis: 24 YO
WR: Brian Robiskie: 2nd round draft pick by Kokinis: 23 YO
TE: Ben Watson: Free Agent signing by H&H: 30 YO
LT: Joe Thomas: 1st round pick by Savage (All praise be to Savage): 26 YO
LG: Eric Stienbach: Free Agent signing by Savage (All praise be to Savage): 31 YO
C: Alex Mack: 1st round draft pick by Kokinis: 25 YO
RG: Shuan Lauvao: 3rd round draft pick by Kokinis H&H: 23 YO
RT: Tony Pashos: Free Agent signing by H&H: 31 YO
Five Seven starters, one being a FB, have been replaced by H&H, and only two of those would be deemed "must hits" on draft pick value (If you are new to me, I believe that you have to make the top 50 picks, or rounding up the first two rounds of the NFL draft count.)
**UPDATE** I had two above players listed incorrectly. Thanks to those who pointed it out.
So two 2nd rounders is the only premium currency that the front office has used on the offense. That's it, in two years.
The Ben Watson signing was solid and the Pashos signing has been okay when he has been healthy, but I wouldn't call either one of their deals "monster contracts" and would say that we have gotten return on their signings.
But looking at the picture as a whole, this front office hasn't spent big money or high picks on the offense. They have been using lottery tickets (late picks) and dumpster diving for deals.
What this means to me is that this front office doesn't have their finger prints on this offense yet. Sure, we are installing a new type of offense, but I'm not sure what personnel will be held over to next season. There is a real chance that the 2012 Cleveland Browns could have 6 different starters than what we expected to have at the start of this season (QB, RB, WR, LG, RG, RT).
The defense didn't get rebuilt overnight. It took two solid drafts, some good free agent money, and two trades. And if we are being realistic, the defense is still far from done. I doubt the Browns would disagree that we need more depth on the DL, maybe a better pass rusher at RDE, more athleticism at LB, and possibly a new starter at CB and FS.
But with all that, the Browns have 4-5 guys on defense that we can really build around that are young. When is the last time we could say that?
What I am getting at, is that the Browns front office has what looks like a real plan here. Get a ton of picks, build up the defense, find out what you have on offense, and rebuild through the draft. I would bet that we will address the offensive side of the ball this April.
Remember this offseason when everyone was panicking because the Browns weren't spending oodles of money in the free agent market? Weddle would have been nice, and so would have been Charles Johnson, but we aren't doing too poorly without them. Seems like a prudent plan now. See what we have. Spend money later.
So while the offense sucks to watch right now, and I think they will get it on track, enjoy this defense, because it has been built the right way.
307 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It has passed on high end offensive prospects (Julio Jones, CJ Spiller, etc.) to build up on defense.
God, I wish we had Spiller.
Sammy Watkins for Heisman
i know the clemson love … but doesn’t he stink so far in buff?
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I think Buffalo was one of the worst places he could have gone. They never use him, so we have no idea. I don’t think he sucks; I just think that right now, Jackson’s better.
Sammy Watkins for Heisman
He’s okay. He’s not an every down back though.
I guess there's only one thing left to do.....win the whole ******* thing. - Major League
by 24rubikscube on Oct 24, 2011 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions
I think it’s safe to call him a bust. You don’t neglect to use a high first round pick as a conscious choice. They have given him every opportunity and he’s shown nothing. I’m SO glad we didn’t draft him!
Exactly. Darren McFadden was also a bust at this time in his career.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 25, 2011 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Yep. Correct me if I’m wrong, but the Bills offensive line was pretty bad last year. He still averaged 3.8 yards/carry. Not good, but not horrible either. Average. And he was a rookie.
This season, with only 15 carries, he’s averaging 7.1 yards/carry. Obviously that’d drop with more, but it’s still good with a SSS. He’s still a threat as a pass-catching back and as a kick returner.
Fred Jackson gets more of the carries probably because he is ahead of Spiller. I think it’s more of an “issue” of Jackson being good than Spiller being terrible.
Also, he should have won the Heisman, and the fact he wasn’t even invited to NY still pisses me off.
Sammy Watkins for Heisman
I think it’s more of an "issue" of Jackson being good than Spiller being terrible.
Exactly correct. The draft pick, frankly, was an odd one in the first place. They already had Jackson (who had played well the season before) and Marshawn Lynch. And they needed help everywhere else. Never understand why they picked him.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 25, 2011 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think they expected Jackson to be what he has turned into and Spiller was absolutely electric in college. They were looking for a gamechanger.
I don’t think they expected Jackson to be what he has turned into
Definitely not. But when you have so many needs, and you have two very competent RBs (which Buffalo did at the time), I think you would use your top 10 pick somewhere else.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 25, 2011 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions
the funny thing is that i thought the exact same when i came back to this thread and went, “who typed that?! oh…”
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m happy with Haden.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 24, 2011 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m pretty sure Lauvao was an H&H pick too…
Only thing manlier than football? Ponies.
by BrownDawg1409 on Oct 24, 2011 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought so, but couldn’t completely tell.
by johnf34 on Oct 24, 2011 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Whatever happened to him?
"There's a gleam men, there's a gleam!" Marty
by Red-Right-88 on Oct 25, 2011 8:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Kotknus(sp)?
Resident Tim Couch Apologist.
by Dawg Nuts on Oct 24, 2011 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
Kokinis, we hardly knew ye…
I wonder if he is still in football. That’s one thing that shows how sad our front office/personnel has been this last decade – how many of our former F.O. guys and players went on to make meaningful contributions to a team after leaving the Browns? Not many. Christ, opie savage chose the illustrious color commentator position for ’Bama radio after leaving us…lol
Interesting fact: Only 2 — yes 2 — defensive players (not starters) are still on this roster that were on the roster in the 08 season, only two full season ago. Those two are D’Qwell and Ahtyba Rubin (a guy who saw almost no action in 08). Pretty crazy.
But, it wasn’t just the D. On offense, we have only 3 players — Thomas, Steinbach and Cribbs. One of those guys is on IR and Cribbs wasn’t much of an offensive player in 2008.
Shows just how f—-ed up our d was when Savage and Romeo left.
And while we are at it — there are only 2 other players left from two seasons ago — Phil Dawson and Pontbriand.
Pretty sad team that Mangini inherited.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 24, 2011 5:13 PM EDT reply actions
Someone, and whoever you are please take credit, (I searched through four different threads and could not find the comment. I want to say DawgNuts or TDSH?)
I think I have made this point somewhere but not in any way that I think would stand out.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 24, 2011 5:15 PM EDT reply actions
pretty sure it was HenryDawg in a back and forth w/ me in the game recap for this week. will see if i can find it.
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions
from the instant recap thread:
Could not agree more. I see no reason though for them not to improve. Especially since our last 2 drafts we’ve taken defense high, with only Little and Hardesty high. I’m hoping Heckert can work some magic finding #1 guys for the offense.
And Colt McCoy learns how to play like an NFL QB.
by HenryDawg on Oct 23, 2011 4:56 PM PDT
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions
RB: Peyton Hillis: Acquired through trade by Kokinis: 25 YO
No, that was Heckert (though Mangini definitely had input on both getting rid of Brady and getting Hillis).
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 24, 2011 5:18 PM EDT reply actions
Lauvao was also Heckert.
Every single pick Heckert has made from the 4th round down in the last two years, with the exception of Jordan Cameron, started last week (and all this year, except for Hardesty).
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 24, 2011 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Hillis and Lauvao were H&H.
My dog is a badass. His name is Kosar.
Why does the internet have political prisoners?
My bad, will fix tonight.
This is what I get for writing this while watching Maury.
by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 24, 2011 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions
lol what?
My dog is a badass. His name is Kosar.
Why does the internet have political prisoners?
by Brownie's Year on Oct 24, 2011 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions
I will admit it. I love Maury.
Nothing cracks me up like seeing someone run off stage after being told that the 27th dude they have brought on the show is not their father, or seeing some dude claim that a lie detector test is wrong.
I know I shouldn’t get joy from that kind of thing, but I love it.
by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 24, 2011 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions
the “not the baby daddy dance” is one of the greatest things ever captured on television.
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t think any of that is real anyways.
My dog is a badass. His name is Kosar.
Why does the internet have political prisoners?
by Brownie's Year on Oct 24, 2011 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I miss the days when he would have obese kids or out of control teens, or anything other than “baby mama drama”. Sidenote: I used to know someone who went on Maury. She was used for a while in the cut to commercial segment because she said he baby’s father was “nothing but a big dumb redneck” on the show. She wasn’t exactly small herself either.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.
by North Coast Flea on Oct 25, 2011 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I always liked the KKK and neo-Nazi episodes.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 25, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Thank you for putting my thoughts into words perfectly. I said earlier today that we need to give the guys upstairs a chance to work on the offense and until then the offense will probably look pretty frustrating. Don’t know if that’s what you were thinking of.
I think this draft is probably the one where we go after a Justin Blackmon or some other offensive playmaker… And, as much as I hate to say it, maybe a QB with an arm. I watched Colt yesterday, and then watched Christian Ponder play and DANG, it would be nice to have someone with a cannon like Ponder. That dude can throw a deep ball.
Great read. I haven’t looked into it yet, but I wonder if H&H prefer to spend free agency money on one side of the ball over the other. Like going strictly draft on D and free agency on O? Suppose that’s all situational.
It’s probably evenly spread so far.
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
heckert (who is bald … stayed away from fat in honor of bernie’s request) had a history of nailing defense, specifically defensive backfield, in philly, with andy reid getting more of the credit for offensive stuff. while holmgren, obviously, has a history of killing it on the offensive side of the ball. putting it down on paper makes it sound like they knew what they were doing in building this FO … pretty good complementary pieces.
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Honest question: Who did Holmgren ever draft on the offensive side that really panned out? I know all about Heckert’s history, but know almost nothing about Holmgren except for identifying QB talent.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 24, 2011 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Alexander, Steve Hutchinson as well.
I can do some digging tonight.
by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 24, 2011 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Those are definitely good picks.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 24, 2011 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Another one they didn’t mention is Darrell Jackson. not a flashy player, but had 3 1,000 yard season and over 7,000 career yards. Not bad for a 3rd round WR.
He also got porkchop in the 4th and got heath Evans (a good FB) in the 3rd. His only real “miss” was Chris mcintosh
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
he found hasselbeck, he brought favre into gb (i know that was a trade), mark chmura, edgar bennett, robert brooks, ferguson, dorsey levens, alexander and hutchinson … i think his track record is pretty solid. not all of those are necessarily draftees, but those are all guys who, off the top of my head, he acquired in his time elsewhere.
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Darrell Jackson was pretty good for a bit in Seattle as well.
by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 24, 2011 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions
He screwed up big on a lot of them though. I wouldn’t want Holmgren having too much of a hand in the draft.
I guess there's only one thing left to do.....win the whole ******* thing. - Major League
by 24rubikscube on Oct 24, 2011 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Heckert has some decent hits on offense as well:
Maclin, McCoy, Jackson, Kolb(?) and several O linemen still playing.
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
i don’t mean to take those away from heckert, but w/ reid on the case in philly it seems like reid gets more of the credit for the offensive stuff. i think the defensive players are definitively heckert’s calling card.
to your point, though, he has certainly been involved in an awful lot of solid offensive drafting/acquisition.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions
This is true of Reid… Also a good pipeline of FAs from Philly could come in handy over the next few years. Especially if the uprising against Reid catches up with the organization and players exodus.
From there we have Gocong, Sheldon Brown, Patterson, tried to get that DE Bunkley but he failed the physical.
Not exactly castoffs, actual NFL players.
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
It might be worthwhile to pour some of this half-full glass onto the earth, if nothing else as a way to honor the gods. So, I say this: our beloved Browns have such admirable defensive numbers in part because we have played some bad offenses.
May the gods be pleased.
The one thing about that argument is this: this is still the NFL.
No matter how bad an offense is, players can still make plays. We held down the Dolphins that went up and down the field against the Patriots on Monday night the first week, and there are some other examples.
Kudos to our defense for doing what they should do. Hammer down on “poor” offenses and not letting them score. How many times in the past 15 years have we watched “poor” offenses come into Cleveland and light it up?
Maybe that is pie in the sky thinking, but I’m excited.
by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 24, 2011 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions
you have to win the games you should win, and then try to steal a game or two you shouldn’t. no doubt.
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions
You forgot this:
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense…
Sammy Watkins for Heisman
i thought i made it my sig! crap, it hasn’t worked like 3 times…
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions
The only thing I urge is caution. Look at the Rams last year. 7 wins out of nowhere! Easiest schedule in the NFL!
Then reality hits the next year. Schedule matters.
shit, look at the 2007 browns. an abundance of caution is required with so many questions yet to be answered on this team.
i think this is a terrible .500 team, but you can only play the schedule you have. gotta win the games you are expected to win. if you can’t win those, you’re in a heap of trouble.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Let me put it this way. In no way should 4 teams from the same division be the top 4 defenses in the NFL unless they are all benefiting from the same thing. SInce we know scheduling is based on division, that might give us a hint.
interesting…. The truth hurts sometimes.
But I can’t totally agree. We faced Chris Johnson, D. McFadden, B. Marshall, A.J. Green…. etc. and we still did a pretty good job of keeping them in check.
I think the schedule comments are good points but some of our defenses of the past wouldn’t have done near as well against this opposition. I think this shows great improvement. The next two weeks will be very telling especially Houston.
Brownsyup
yep. our hardest games are in our own division, which i guess can be argued is usually the case, but without the added balltap of facing an offensive powerhouse like NWE, GNB or NOR on top of it.
"Excellent at both run and pass blocking, Dieken proved to be an outstanding player and an iron man" - Wikipedia
The 49ers have beaten the Lions and the Eagles. They are legit.
@grantgw - sports and Cleveland and Columbus stuff
by woodsmeister on Oct 25, 2011 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions
No matter what, I refuse to believe that a team with Alex Smith is legit.
by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 25, 2011 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Yea, since the Lions and Eagles are totally legit.. Haha
Small sample size. The 49ers have proven absolutely nothing yet.
The Lions are most definitely legit. They’re 5-2 against a schedule that we would have been 0-7 against.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 25, 2011 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Yea, still have to keep Number 9 on the field and get it done for 16 games though. I believe they’ll get in the playoffs but they aren’t there yet.
What exactly is your definition of legit?
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 25, 2011 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions
A season or more of above average football. Much more than 7 games. I think Det gets there, not sold on SF yet.
You realize that means there are less than 10 “legit” teams in the NFL?
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 26, 2011 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions
The 49ers beat them with #9 on the field. I am not sold on their long-term viability as a contender until Stafford can prove he can stay healthy either. But he was healthy when they lost to the 49ers.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
This. We have made truly garbage quarterbacks in the past look like Joe Montana in games. I mean, when you make Cleo Lemon look amazing, your defense might just be crap. At least we didn’t let Charlie Whitehurst throw all over us this week. in fact, we made him look about as good as he should’ve looked against a good NFL defense. I was, and continue to be pleased with that side of the ball this year. I just hope the success can be mirrored on the offense in the next season after another solid draft.
by Off-the-Chain on Oct 24, 2011 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions
again, same Charlie Whitehurst that dissected the Giants 1 week before and put up a good game against the Saints in the playoffs
"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"
by Gradysmanldy on Oct 25, 2011 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions
what dorn said on the playoff game.
giants numbers: 10/18, 146 yards, 1 TD … that’s “dissecting”?
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions
If you’re Daniel Wolf and you’re talking about Colt McCoy, that is definitely dissecting.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 25, 2011 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
i don’t read his stuff … is he a huge mccoy fanboy?
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions
what was the QB rating, 104? I’d take a punch to the d*** for 14 yds/c.
Also, I was off a game….Whitehurst played the week before vs. St. Louis to clinch the playoff spot. He was 22/36 192 and a TD w/no picks.
Not fantastic, but MUCH better than the crapfest he threw against the B’s sunday.
I’m not saying he’s a good quarterback, or that the Seahawks aren’t terrible….but i’m willing to give the defense credit for planning a good scheme and playing a good game.
"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"
by Gradysmanldy on Oct 25, 2011 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions
The TD was WIDE OPEN. I probably could have hit that pass. Definitely a blown coverage by the Giants.
I mentioned elsewhere, but I was at the game, and it was pretty sloppy. Whitehurst to his credit did not mess up and made a few good throws when needed.
Unlike the Browns game, where he was absolutely Anderson-esque. Just saying, this was the first time as a Seahawk he completely crapped himself.
"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"
by Gradysmanldy on Oct 25, 2011 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Whether people want to believe it or not, this regime is going to find us a franchise QB. If they (doesn’t matter what any of us think) believe Colt is good enough then we’ll let him be the man. If not, they’ve proven in their evaluations that they can fix the situation because of their eye for talent. It may or not be Colt but Holmgren and Heckert will find the answer, and it will be either now or in the next draft or two (at the latest).
by johnf34 on Oct 24, 2011 6:39 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
In Heckert we trust.
2nd best thing Holmgren has done so far.
(1st was the season ticket holder ballcaps last year.)
My parents came across one of those and gave it to me.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.
by North Coast Flea on Oct 25, 2011 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought that was interesting too. Also, I think it would be interesting to compare the relative ages of the defense in the AFC north. I suspect that the Browns and the Bengals trend young, while the Ravens and Steelers trend old. I think we could see a real power struggle in the AFC North over the next 3 to 5 years.
sweet.
"You are the worst villains in football, your evil plan never ceases."-Mooncamping
by discoinferno083 on Oct 24, 2011 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions
like sugar.
"You are the worst villains in football, your evil plan never ceases."-Mooncamping
by discoinferno083 on Oct 25, 2011 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I would rather see a power shift than a struggle.
My dog is a badass. His name is Kosar.
Why does the internet have political prisoners?
by Brownie's Year on Oct 24, 2011 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions
The thing is that the Ravens and Steelers have shown an ability to reload on the fly, especially at the important positions.
The Ravens went from Peter Boulware to Terell Suggs.
The Steelers went from Kevin Greene to Joey Porter to James Harrison, etc.
The Browns need to supply that first layer of young players that grow together and create a winning atmosphere that young players can step in and fill that pipeline.
That is what I think the Browns are trying to do here.
Being honest here, I wouldn’t be pissed one bit if the Browns used their two first rounders on a defensive lineman and a CB in April.
by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 24, 2011 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn’t be pissed one bit if the Browns used their two first rounders on a defensive lineman and a CB in April
you can never draft too many linemen.
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I think this is always true. Not that we have much depth anywhere, but this unit is quite slim too.
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
I don’t think “slim” is the right word to describe a unit with Tuba Rubin and Phil Taylor in it.
by Legoman0721 on Oct 25, 2011 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Slim is the antithesis of Phil Taylor
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
More like Phil (my plate up) Taylor.
by crazyL80 on Oct 25, 2011 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
rec
"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"
by Gradysmanldy on Oct 25, 2011 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions
*Fat Fairley.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 25, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
*Uncle Phil
Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.
by North Coast Flea on Oct 25, 2011 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I am still waiting to see if they can “reload” Ray Lewis, Polamalu, and Reed.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
If they don’t use at least 1 of the picks on offense I’ll be disappointed. I’m fine with using one of the 1st rounders and the second rounder on D but we need to draft either a OL or WR with one of our top picks.
The Alot is better than Brian Robiskie at everything..
Im really quite fine with getting a quality o-lineman in FA, if possible. Steinbach has been a great fill for the offense for a while…..seems much harder to find quality D-lineman in FA, especially with any kind of youth
"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"
by Gradysmanldy on Oct 25, 2011 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I think this year is stacked at WR (Blackmmon, Jeffery, Fuller, Floyd, etc)
I can wait until the second round for a WR.
by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 25, 2011 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I think if Blackmon is available we should take him. I think he’s much better than anyone else in the draft at that position.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 25, 2011 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions
isn’t he hurt?
"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"
by Gradysmanldy on Oct 25, 2011 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions
“concussion-like symptoms”
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions
I am of the thinking that Blackmon will be gone by the time we pick.
by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 25, 2011 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Wherefore art thou Travis Wilson….
(I know he was a third rounder)
"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"
by Gradysmanldy on Oct 25, 2011 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Travis Wilson — a typical Phil Savage pick: A mid-round pick with “first round talent/potential”. See also Beau Bell, Martin Rucker, Leon Williams, etc.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 25, 2011 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I said the same thing in my Sunday Five yesterday, but the Browns were 7th at the time. Amazing to see the entire division 1-4 in the rankings, assuming Baltimore doesn’t implode today.
Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.
by Chris Pokorny on Oct 24, 2011 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions
One division holding the top 4 spots. How often does something like this happen? Sure it will probably only be for this week, but it’s a story if you ask me.
My dog is a badass. His name is Kosar.
Why does the internet have political prisoners?
by Brownie's Year on Oct 24, 2011 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I completely agree and disagree
1. i agree, H&H have absolutely turned around the RAW talent of our defense and made it arguably one of the best in the nfl (in terms of age and talent) . but take a look at our DC, dick juaron. he is absolutely outsanding and a great football mind.
2. i think youre looking at our offense completely backwards. we have an offense FILLED with RAW talent. the problem we have is with Pat Shurhur. he is not a good coach or more importantly, offensive coordinator. AT ALL. in your list you even have tons of good football names that all have talent
Colt Mccoy
MoMass
Greg Little
Ben Watson
Evan Moore/Alex Smith (please lets not forget about our incredible other tight ends)
Owen Marecic
Joe Thomas
Shaun Lavaou
Alex Mack
Tony Pashos
Peyton Hillis
Montario Hardesty
Joshua Cribbs (who hopefully wont be playing any more offense, and will focus on special teams, i hope)
anyway, there are 11 players on the field at a time, and at the least you have 8 of the players on that list, on the field at any given time. that is a VERY SOLID offense. the browns only problem right now is pat shurmur. and hey maybe he is a good coach. but right now im not impressed, he needs to relieve himself of OC duties because i cant watch any more of this browns offensive talent being wasted
Seeing that list makes me cry.
Mangini apologist by default.
by Villeslgr on Oct 24, 2011 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
You and I have very different ideas of “offensive talent”.
by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 24, 2011 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions
i think he and everyone in the world have a different idea of “offensive talent”
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 24, 2011 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I bet his idea of “offensive talent” lines up with mooncamping’s idea of “offensive talent.”
Personally, I think it’s offensive that some of those guys are considered talent.
by Legoman0721 on Oct 25, 2011 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn’t include Lavaou in there quite yet. Pashos is a liability for how often he’s injured.
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
I think Luvao needs to be replaced. He has been awful this year.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 25, 2011 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions
worse than awful. hopefully greco sticks for a while.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Disagree. The talent is, in fact, offensive.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 25, 2011 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
Haha! Rec.
Go, I say go away boy, you bother me.
by burntorangeandbrown on Oct 25, 2011 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions
I think you have the same idea if he meant “offensive talent”
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
by bross09 on Oct 25, 2011 4:15 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m also worried about Shurmur. I spent some time yesterday on last years SB Nation Rams blog and many of the same criticisms were made about Shurmur’s offense, especially play calling. And that with completely different talent. He seems a bit overwhelmed to me right now when viewed on the sidelines.
Brownsyup
i think he made a critical error in taking on the OC and HC duties. that is way way too much for a brand new head coach to take on, and i don’t buy the bullshit that there “wasn’t the right guy” available. i think they all thought it would be doable since holmgren did it.
with the offensive talent (or lack thereof), the shitty qb play, the atrocious receivers, and the injuries to hillis i do think it’s tough to do a thorough evaluation of the offensive system he’s installed. the rams weren’t exactly the greatest show on turf last year, talent-wise, either. don’t get me wrong, the results have been pathetic this year, and i put a significant amount of colt’s regression on shurmur, but i don’t know if we really know enough to judge his offensive sets.
my biggest worries and criticisms are the regression of the offense through 6 games, even with all the caveats i mentioned above, and the continued special teams and penalties breakdowns. the buck stops w/ shurmur, and this team isn’t doing the easy things right. that can’t happen and expect to be competitive against good teams.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions
That is a good point about wearing both OC and HC hats. I’m just concerned that the exact same criticisms of Shurmur in St. Louis are following him here. As I stated when he was brought on, he wasn’t that successful with the Rams. It is as if we took Daboll and made him our head coach. Well, maybe not that bad…
Brownsyup
yeah, i definitely get it as far as the concerns about shurmur’s resume. his rams teams were not good offensively, but you do, of course, have to consider what he had to work with.
to me, the guy has an “incomplete” for virtually his entire career, which doesn’t exactly translate to a brilliant hire for head coach. his offenses in st. louis had bottom-of-the-barrel talent, and you could probably argue a similar issue here. maybe he’ll turn out to be great once he has some talent around him, but you can’t exactly pin any optimism to his results.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions
It seems like the only criterion was his handling of Bradford. Hardly grounds for making him an HC and definitely not a sound recommendation for giving him HC and OC mantel simultaneously. I think it can be done, but you have to have more talent on your team than we do in order for it to work.
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
Reasons I am still optimistic about this team:
-Heckert and Holmgren in the frotn offense
-We are 3-3. We beat bad teams but are 3-3
-Our defense rocks. we are 8th in points allowed, 5th and 9th respectively in net ypa and net ypc. We are also 10th in opponent’s 3rd down %.
-We are really young. only 4 of the 17 starters acquired by H&H are 30 and only 7 are over 26.
-GregLittleIsBeast
-Colt hasn’t been good but has shown some promise. He is one of the better QBs in the league at converting 3rd downs, good in the 4th quarter and in the RZ, and led a 4th quarter comeback.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
-We are 3-3. We beat bad teams but are 3-3
this is all but irrelevant. i’m not sure why our .500 record against terrible — not just bad — teams is relevant to why we should be optimistic. that’s what lead to the entire city going on suicide watch in 2008.
-Colt hasn’t been good but has shown some promise
i really think you’re reaching here. i don’t know what promise he’s shown as qb of the browns.
aside from that, i’m willing to agree that we have reasons to be optimistic about the future of this organization. cautious optimism, but optimism nonetheless.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions
that’s what lead to the entire city going on suicide watch in 2008.
No, that was the city having faith in DA as a legitimate QB. I don’t get why you think its dangerous to the point of suicide watch to be at least somewhat optimistic that we beat the teams we should beat. If they were 2-4, I would definitely be a bit pessimistic because they aren’t playing up to my expectations
i really think you’re reaching here.
I listed why. This team is 9th in the league in 3rd down conversion % overall, thats better than Buffalo and Tennessee. We are also solid in our conversion rates through the air. Colt is 7th in conversion rate on 3rd and mediums and 11th on his ability to convert 3rd and long’s.
He does seem to play better in “clutch” situations but he sucks for 90% of the rest of the time. I’d still call that “promise”.
This is definitely all cautious optimism
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
the suicide watch i was referring to was the team going from 10-6 in 2007 to a million games below .500 in 2008. everyone thought we were good b/c of 10-6 … but that emperor had no clothes, the 2007 schedule was a joke, and we saw that come home to roost in 2008. if we are overly psyched about being .500 right now, we’re going to be really disappointed when we finish 5-11, or whatever, and have a bad record again next year.
if colt sucks for 90% of the time, i think it’s the definition of reaching to say there’s still “promise”.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
i think it’s the definition of reaching to say there’s still "promise".
please explain why its reaching to see "promise in a guy who has converted a higher percentage of his 3rd and mediums through the air than Tom Brady? or has the 3rd highest QB rating in the league in the Red Zone? He is also one of the better QBs in the league when he has 3-4 WRs and/or is out of the shotgun. That’s a lot like what he did in Texas, and the fact that he is executing similar types of plays that he did in Texas shows that he may be sucking some times, but he can do what he has been comfortable with.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
if you went to a burger joint 10 times and 9 of those times the burger sucked, would you go back an 11th time b/c the 1 good burger showed “promise”?
you were the one who said he sucks “90% of the rest of the time”.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
what if its the only burger joint around and you love burgers like crackrock?
Smile big, hug bigger. Talk big, act bigger. Stop judging do something, shut the fck up do something.
by pwndabear on Oct 25, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Then I make a special trip to Swensons.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 25, 2011 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
i just had five guys (a new one opened right near my office) for lunch and it was freaking amazing.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah, that foil-wrapped gut grenade is highly dangerous … but amazingly delicious.
i’ve got my next trip there slated for march, 2012…
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Just had Sweanson’s last night. I have one 5 minutes away. Skyway too.
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
I hate you.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 25, 2011 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions
damn you. I passed by swenson’s recently but couldn’t pick it up because I was going to CAK
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
eating a burger isn’t like watching an NFL QB play. that analogy barely makes any sense.
you also forgot the fact that the 90% is “the rest of the time”. That is on 1st and 2nd downs outside of the red zone and for the first 3 quarters (he has been a solid 4th quarter QB.
He still needs a lot of work, but the fact that he executes on 3rd downs (which are crucial to an offense) makes me optimistic that he can be good. He is getting it done in higher pressure situations, that is definitely a plus
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
i thought it was a great analogy.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think a burger is anywhere near the same as being QB in the NFL
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
well then you clearly have no idea what the point of an analogy is
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I do think there is a common ground – something I believe we can all agree on. There is a valid analogy to be made regarding QBs and hamburgers. It is best summed up by saying that I watched Joe Flacco play quarterback last night, and at the end of the game my initial thought was “where’s the beef?”.
Go, I say go away boy, you bother me.
by burntorangeandbrown on Oct 25, 2011 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m old enough to remember “Where’s the Beef?” I’m guessing many on here aren’t.
Resident Tim Couch Apologist.
Sad, but true.
Go, I say go away boy, you bother me.
by burntorangeandbrown on Oct 26, 2011 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Wendy’s is bringing it back i think. Not nearly as cool as the original.
Mangini apologist by default.
I’m speaking about his innate accuracy, not how well that innate accuracy is translating on the field.
It couldn’t possibly be as cool as the original.
Go, I say go away boy, you bother me.
by burntorangeandbrown on Oct 27, 2011 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Colt McCoy’s team picture

"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
by LocalMan on Oct 25, 2011 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I will drive to Akron tonight if you don’t stop that.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 25, 2011 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions
After less than a full season worth of starts.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.
by North Coast Flea on Oct 25, 2011 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions
at what point is it ok to start to develop an opinion of colt, then? 16 games is the cut off? that’s when i can express an opinion? so, after the houston game, his 16th start, i’m allowed to talk about what i think of colt? or do i have to give him until the end of this season?
this “wait until he has a full season” or “wait for the end of this season” to judge colt is absurd. i’m totally on board with giving him all of 2011 to start (if for no other reason than we have no other option even remotely worth seeing), but after watching 14 starts i think it’s pretty reasonable to have put together some degree of thoughts and opinion on his abilities. i’ve raised this example before, it took the entire city of cleveland 12 starts to surmise that brady quinn was horrible. now we have to have patience before we start to have an opinion about colt?
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m just saying that some of the all time greats didn’t look that great until their second or third season. Not saying he’s going to be one but it’s too early to make a judgement.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.
by North Coast Flea on Oct 25, 2011 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
It is not too early to look at the way he plays the game. Not too early to look at how the ball flies in his passes vs other QBs. There is a vast difference even when looking at other rookies especially in delivering the ball. This is not one of those guys who will be great in his 3rd season. You have to show promise and fundamental ability. I don’t see this at all. He will be a serviceable backup and I wish him a long career at this.
Brownsyup
He looks a lot like Chad Pennington to me.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 25, 2011 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I’d take Chad Pennington over any of the quarterbacks we’ve had in the last 4 years. Hell, I’d take Ty Pennington over some of those guys.
So would I, but Chad Pennington never took a team to the super bowl.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 25, 2011 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s okay to make judgments of Colt right now. When I say “wait until the end of the season,” I’m going to make a FINAL judgment.
Sammy Watkins for Heisman
by emily522 on Oct 25, 2011 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t know if 16 games is the “cutoff” but its somewhere between 16 games and the end of this season is when I am going to start making a more defined decision.
We have definitely seen enough to have thoughts and opinions on abilities.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
oh, and the Brady Quinn thing, he only had a dozen starts but he also had 3 years. He had years where he was allowed to sit and QBs who sit and learn for a couple years generally have a better first season starting (see phillip rivers, matt schaub, carson palmer, etc…). The idea of a rookie QB coming in and lighting it up is only a recent thing.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
i don’t think the 3 years matters much at all. especially considering we changed coaching staffs and offensive systems at least once (maybe twice?) in quinn’s 3 years. sure, you may expect faster maturation, but a lot of guys struggle in their first opportunity as a starter, regardless of how long they’ve “sat and watched”.
and really, it doesn’t change my point.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions
we did change it once, but the years of sitting do matter.
A lot of guys do struggle even when sitting, but historically QBs who sit a year or two are more likely to do well right off the bat in their first year starting.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
that’s just not true. you can just remember the good ones.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions
really? so it wasn’t considered the general “rule” in the NFL that QBs sit because they wouldn’t do well if they were thrown in in the first year? This rule was broken recently, but it was considered how you went about things if you wanted to have a succcessful QB
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Not trying to be contrarian but I thought he sat too long and sort of stagnated. I also didn’t really think he’ld be that great but I think if he had one more year he might have been pretty OK.
i actually agree with you on the stagnation point. honestly, i think we’re telling a very different story if quinn had gotten into camp on time his rookie year and taken the starting qb job from da and frye.
but we’ll never know, and he stinks now.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions
My favorite play in the Ravens game tonight was the Joe Flaco pass to Joe Flaco for -8 yards.
Beats Colt McCoy’s single game record for ‘shittiest pass to self’ performance in the AFC North by 3 yards this year. That’s a stat, right?
Thanks Joe
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
by LocalMan on Oct 24, 2011 11:59 PM EDT reply actions 6 recs
He wanted to pass it to someone but since it was ironically a screen so nobody was looking and he had to run for it.
I’m not sure they were correct, but the announcers said he couldn’t throw the ball again because it was a forward pass.
Mangini apologist by default.
I’m speaking about his innate accuracy, not how well that innate accuracy is translating on the field.
4th and 43. I don’t think we’ve ever been that bad.
Even Doug Dieken admits Joe Thomas is the real #73
There’s still time.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 25, 2011 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t have the hate for the Ravens that some Browns fans have. It was Modell, not the people of Baltimore (who had nothing to do with it) or the players on the Ravens.
That said, I still love it when they lose.
i live here, too
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions
You take that back!
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Oct 25, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
F*ck the Yankees.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.
by North Coast Flea on Oct 25, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
FLAG
My dog is a badass. His name is Kosar.
Why does the internet have political prisoners?
by Brownie's Year on Oct 25, 2011 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions
The people of Baltimore elected the Mayor of Baltimore who gave Art Modell the 30 pieces of silver necessary to sell out Cleveland. The people of Baltimore have spent the last 15 years justifying everything they did to steal our team after bitching and moaning about how crushed they were when Irsay stole their team, and yet, somehow, many of them believe that they are not acting hypocritically. The people of Baltimore are complicit and time will not make them any less so. The people of Baltimore and the team they stole from us can go hang.
@grantgw - sports and Cleveland and Columbus stuff
by woodsmeister on Oct 25, 2011 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.
by North Coast Flea on Oct 26, 2011 4:40 AM EDT up reply actions
how was this comment not recc’d before me?
Smile big, hug bigger. Talk big, act bigger. Stop judging do something, shut the fck up do something.
I hate Boston more than the Yankees. It’s the fans
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
It’s weird, here we are 3-3 and we still don’t know what we have in this team. How will they do against a good team? (i know but the titans have been horrible since beating us). Do they play down to their competition, will they play up to better?
We find out Sunday, and if we win that game…and are 4-3, are we at that point legitimate playoff contenders?
"There's a gleam men, there's a gleam!" Marty
are we at that point legitimate playoff contenders?
absolutely not.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree, but look at this scenario: If: we beat SF 4-3
Lose to Hou 4-4
Win the next 3 STL, JAX, Cinci 7-4
Then the big IF we win 3 of the next 5….then we are at 10-6…and the way the ratbirds are playing I think we have a good shot at winning one, we beat Ariz…..but can we win one vs. Stillers?
Hey it can happen..cant it or am I dreaming?
"There's a gleam men, there's a gleam!" Marty
by Red-Right-88 on Oct 25, 2011 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Look at this scenario: If we beat SF, 4-3,
then beat Hou, 5-3,
then beat everyone else, we are 13-3.
We get the bye, win both playoff games and then the big IF, can we win the Super Bowl?
Hey, it can happen . . . can’t it or am I dreaming?
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 25, 2011 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
Ya OK, thats a better scenario.
"There's a gleam men, there's a gleam!" Marty
by Red-Right-88 on Oct 25, 2011 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I tried looking through our division’s schedules yesterday to come up with scenarios, but gave up. Our last 5 games just ruin any shot we have at the playoffs.
My dog is a badass. His name is Kosar.
Why does the internet have political prisoners?
by Brownie's Year on Oct 25, 2011 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions
We are not a playoff team.
I’m excited about this team, but that is kooky talk.
by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 25, 2011 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Do you think based on what we’ve shown so far offensively that we can beat any of the next 4 teams? Seriously? San Francisco has already beaten better teams than us, Jacksonville just beat Baltimore, and Cincinnati is hardly a gimme, especially since they’ve already beaten us one. I appreciate optimism as much as anyone, but aren’t we counting mythical chickens here?
@grantgw - sports and Cleveland and Columbus stuff
by woodsmeister on Oct 25, 2011 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions
The Jags winning against Baltimore last night reminded me of last time we beat Pittsburgh. We had no business winning that game. It was a matter of circumstance.
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
It also reminded me of the last time we beat Seattle and the last time we beat Buffalo.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
Mythical chicken sounds delicious. Maybe we’ll start serving it at Joe Thomas’s House of Pancakes.
Resident Tim Couch Apologist.
by Dawg Nuts on Oct 26, 2011 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
How will they do against a good team?
I’m not saying it will be a blood bath, but it might be a good idea for them to make nice with the local medical professionals on their way to the stadium.
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
Another silver lining regarding our defense. They have kept opposing offenses off the field and kept our offense on the field. Assuming this trend continues, this means we should get a very large “sample size” on which to judge Colt McCoy, which is a very good thing regardless of whether he proves himself QBOTF or otherwise.
Go, I say go away boy, you bother me.
by burntorangeandbrown on Oct 25, 2011 8:33 AM EDT reply actions
You might not be able to judge a defense by yards/game, but I think yards/play is a pretty good statistic. Yards/game can be influenced by a crappy offense that keeps the defense on the field too much, but not yards/play. Where are the Browns ranked in yards/play? 4th. So I think that stat still shows the Browns having a really good defense. Granted, it doesn’t cover over the fact that we’ve played some terrible offenses (Indy, Miami, Seattle, Cincy… all ranked 20th or worse in yards/play).
when i quickly scrolled this thread i caught your username and thought … “golan?”
the football outsiders DVOA stat has our defense ranked 16th … 23 against the pass, 13 against the run. that’s not the be-all, end-all stat, but it does try to account for competition, situation, etc.
as i’ve said, i’m really pleasantly surprised by the defense overall, but i think we are giving them too much credit around here.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions
it also hasn’t been updated for the previous week
but i think we are giving them too much credit around here.
why is this?
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
i didn’t realize DVOA hadn’t been updated for this week. presumably we’ll rise, but i can’t imagine we’re going to go, like top-10.
honestly, i think a case of low expectations has us super-amped about the defensive performance. as i’ve said, they’ve been a very pleasant surprise, and i’m excited for the future with this defense. but we still have a lot of holes, particularly in the pass rush and at linebacker, and we’ve played some pretty abysmal offensive opponents. i also tend to like DVOA more than the other stats, and i see a lot of celebration around here about being 4th or 8th in yds/game or yds/play, etc., and i just don’t think that tells the whole story.
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
we are up to 14th compared to 16th.
This D is playing great, but they do have to prove themselves against a better offense. They are playing probably 5-10 range among the defenses so far and I don’t take a ton of stock into team’s SoS this early in the season because how good a team is can be much of a product of who they played and standings will change a lot.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
They are playing probably 5-10 range among the defenses so far and I don’t take a ton of stock into team’s SoS this early in the season
made up shit according to bross, by bross. this is completely fabricated.
you are very much a supporter of the football outsiders stuff until you decide that you’re not, huh?
gutted out a win, great defensive performance, need more from the offense...
by DontCallMeJoey on Oct 25, 2011 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions
no, I just find that weighting strength of schedule heavily after less than 40% of the season isn’t always going to give the best rankings.
Its my observations. I think this is a top 10 D, but on the low end of that so far.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Does Terry Pluto read Dawgs By Nature? His column in the Plain Dealer today pretty much echoes the thoughts put forth here about the focus on defense by the front office. Coincidence? I think not!
Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war
by Kaner on Oct 25, 2011 10:44 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
I was just going to write the same thing about Pluto. This is a very good analysis of the current situation done by B19K. Great job.
You think about grand strategy of building a team that has basically dozens of holes and you have to build through the draft. You must hit on at least 3 starters per year and maybe 1 or 2 more via free agency or a lucky late rounder (Rubin for example). You may have heard the phrase, “you need to get worse to get better”. Often said in the NBA, this refers to the idea that you need to have a bad year to get a high pick. So if you build first on one side of the ball (and defense makes the most sense) it will make you better but maybe not enough better to get out of the higher picks. I’m not saying that it is purposeful to lose but it may be purposeful to not win—to the extent of barely missing the playoffs year after year like Washington or Phlly as they try to build through free-agency without a core.
I’m really glad this article appeared on DBN as it really put things in perspective for me and helped me remember a few things.
Brownsyup
Maybe he got referred by MKC.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.
by North Coast Flea on Oct 25, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
breaking news: Shurmur’s Guide to Bye Week Preparation has been made mandatory league reading.
Baltimore read it last week, and San Fran starting reading it Sunday.
We can’t go wrong!
"You are the worst villains in football, your evil plan never ceases."-Mooncamping
by discoinferno083 on Oct 25, 2011 12:14 PM EDT reply actions
Except Baltimore is not coming off a bye. Just saying.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Oct 25, 2011 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions
The fact that Baltimore lost last night just proves that any team can win on any given day. 3-3 is still .500 no matter who we played.
The Alot is better than Brian Robiskie at everything..
I believe the technical term is “any random sunday”
Smile big, hug bigger. Talk big, act bigger. Stop judging do something, shut the fck up do something.
Any given Sunday.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.
by North Coast Flea on Oct 25, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions

Smile big, hug bigger. Talk big, act bigger. Stop judging do something, shut the fck up do something.
by pwndabear on Oct 25, 2011 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.
by North Coast Flea on Oct 26, 2011 4:45 AM EDT up reply actions

by 





















