The Sunday Five: San Francisco Finally Living Up to Their Potential
"The Sunday Five" is a loosely-titled piece where I talk about five NFL- or Browns-related topics related to this past week. In today's edition, I take a look at how the 49ers are finally living up to their potential, what a win would mean for the Browns this week, and more.
When the Browns take on the 49ers, it is not like they will be facing an entirely new team in terms of style of play. In fact, I think you can pick and choose to make a lot of comparisons between the 49ers and the Bengals, Raiders, and Seahawks, three teams that Cleveland has already faced. San Francisco combines the efforts of those three teams to form a more "complete package" of sorts. This team has had a lot of potential for years but have never lived up to expectations until Jim Harbaugh came to town. The 49ers are showing a lot more consistency, and what has been more impressive is the fact that for being a non-threatening passing team, they have staged some nice comebacks against the Eagles and the Lions.
Here is something I have been wondering: what if there is a problem with Mohamed Massaquoi when it comes to the passing game? I think he has been having a fine season, coming up with several big receptions late in games. But, I also remember that he missed the entire preseason and training camp and was thrown into the starting lineup Week 1 with very little reps under his belt. What if things suddenly look a lot better at the receiver position when Joshua Cribbs and Carlton Mitchell are given more opportunities? Those are two guys who Colt McCoy was in rhythm with during the early part of training camp.
Taking a look at the division this week, as tough of a game that Cleveland has against the 49ers, this is a rare week where they can make up some ground. The Steelers are taking on the Patriots, arguably Pittsburgh's toughest opponent this season. The Cardinals take on the Ravens, and while the one-win Cardinals shouldn't pose a threat to Baltimore, after last week's egg laid by Joe Flacco, they need to prove themselves. The Bengals take on a Seahawks team that has a good defense, might be getting Tarvaris Jackson back under center, and should have running back Marshawn Lynch available. The best-case scenario for the Browns at the end of this week is that they could be a half game out of first place.
I have to pull an excerpt from Terry Pluto's column this morning, because it brings to light what could be another hole at the right tackle position in the coming weeks:
The Browns don't talk about it, but Tony Pashos has been playing on a very sore ankle. He missed the first three games with the injury. He blocked very well his first two games back, but sometimes struggled against Seattle. He plans to play Sunday, but the Browns have to wonder if he can make it through the season. He played the first six games last year, then the ankle injury caused him to miss the rest of the season.
Please, I beg of you, Pashos: stay healthy enough to play at a manageable level. I don't think McCoy or I can stand to see Oniel Cousins or Artis Hicks rotating on a right side of hopelessness again. Right tackle has to be a top priority next offseason, along with wide receiver. That's a shame, too, because we really need some help at the guard positions too.
Another interesting thought as to why Mitchell will play, which was brought up by Pluto: he says that Mitchell will play on special teams coverage in hopes that he can be a difference maker. I hope Mitchell receives the opportunity to play the receiver position too, but I also wouldn't be upset if Jordan Norwood received extended playing time as well. We'll officially see where Brian Robiskie stands on the roster depth chart after this week's game. If Mitchell or Norwood are seeing the field more often than him, then the Robiskie experiment is all but over.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The Robiskie experiment should be over. I’m okay with seeing what Mitchell and Norwood can do with some reps as we have seen what Robiskie can do with plenty of reps.
How is prioritizing tackle and receiver over guards a shame? We’re starting two rookies who really aren’t playing horribly. With a year under their belts, I imagine one, if not both, will turn into a viable long-term starter. Who uses first rounders on guards anyway?
If we can devote our first two picks to tackle and receiver, I think we’ll see the offense’s productivity jump astronomically.
I think Pinkston and Lauvao have been playing horribly, but of course I’d like to see them evolve into solid starters.
Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.
by Chris Pokorny on Oct 30, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree, but pinkston is a rookie, and lavao is in his second year learning a new offense. Hopefully they can improve throughout the year, so we only need a RT come draft time.
by athensdawg on Oct 30, 2011 12:18 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
… what about taking a QB in the first….
The 1 and only thing I think I have ever agreed with Grossi on- If you dont have a QB you dont have an offense. You need an elite qb to become an elite team. Even the best QBs may not be great starting off, but they show the “it” factor from day 1. McCoy has 10 more games to show he has this.
Agree with you there. If they go that route, then I’d like to see the front office do whatever they can to get Luck (which would mean vastly overpaying). I’m not high on either Barkley or Jones as the conciliation prize.
Of course, with Cleveland’s luck, after leveraging our franchise we’d probably see Luck go down with a career-ending injury once our Pashos-less and patchwork offensive line got beat.
The reason tim couch was a bust was because the whole team was patchwork during his tenior, its the same reason every qb through here has not suceeded.The reason people like that rapist in that city that shall not be named is because he went to a good team! think if couch went to phili and mcnabb came to cleveland, who would we be complaining about who we should have drafted? The game is won in the trenches and untill we have a great offensive line and receivers who can catch the ball/get open no qb will suceed here. Im not as high on mccoy as i was last year, but i still think if we spenc those two first round draft picks on a lineman and a receiver we will all be high on the guy again NO FIRST ROUNG QB PLEASE
by nickmar19 on Oct 30, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I agree about the trenches part. But I disagree with your assessment of the WRs. Between Little, MoMass, Watson, Moore, etc we have playmakers. You need a guy to put the ball in place for them. Look at Indys receivers right now. They dont look that great. You need a great QB to win. Great QBs come in the top 40 picks (Favre, Brees come from early second so i will include that). There arent that many Bradys out there.
i think this just clarifies we have no idea what we’re doing when it comes to WR.
Shurmur seems dead set on starting little, cribbs, mo mass and watson.
Doesn’t even seem willing to try putting guys like Moore and Mitchell in there, despite seeing some flashes of effectiveness.
typical HC tunnel-vision.
"You are the worst villains in football, your evil plan never ceases."-Mooncamping
by discoinferno083 on Oct 30, 2011 9:13 PM EDT reply actions

by 




















