Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Greg Little's Drops Pile Up Against Cincinnati

CINCINNATI, OH - NOVEMBER 27: Greg Little #15 of the Cleveland Browns is tackled by Nate Clements #22 of the Cincinnati Bengals after running the ball at Paul Brown Stadium on November 27, 2011 in Cincinnati, Ohio.  (Photo by Tyler Barrick/Getty Images)

Four dropped passes.

This was the number one concern when we drafted Greg Little in the second round of the draft. He often struggled during training camp, but only one other time was it a moderate concern in an actual regular season game. Leave it to when his production was needed most for this problem to rear its ugly head again. It's unfair to compare him to Braylon Edwards because he doesn't have the same attitude. When a receiver drops the ball like Little did at a consistent rate though, you still have to be concerned. Can you count on this guy as a starting receiver in the future? With the game on the line, can a quarterback have faith in him to catch the ball?

"It was kind of like, man, when basketball players have a bad day shooting free throws," he said. "It's just something that sometimes you just can't throw it in the ocean, sometimes you just can't ever hang onto it. It's definitely just something I can just learn and grow from."

Star-divide

Little drew the ire of the media after he skipped the opportunity to be interviewed by reporters following the game. I know Little couldn't possibly have wanted to discuss his terrible game with the media, but it is something that all NFL players have to deal with. Head coach Pat Shurmur didn't lose faith in Little, but emphasized that he needs to stay focused.

"You cannot drop the football -- it's an no-no," said Shurmur. "He dropped too many balls. Catching the football is very important -- focus and concentration. Forget the last play and move on to the next play. I don't expect that to be a trend. I expect it to be something he'll learn from. I'm excited about him getting out there to practice so we can work on that not happening again."

Once a player starts dropping the ball, it's tough for them to get rid of that stigma from the perspective of fans. There are still four big division games left against Baltimore and Pittsburgh. Little has been targeted a team-high 87 times this season, so there is no doubt the Browns will continue throwing his direction. If Little delivers against our hated rivals, he can quickly grab a taste of redemption. If he doesn't, then the Browns may have an additional semi-question mark at the receiver position in 2012.

Comment 959 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Avoiding the media after the game bothers me as much as not catching the ball.

by johnf34 on Nov 28, 2011 8:34 PM EST reply actions  

Not catching the ball bothers me infinitely more

Colt is the answer, winning is the question...

by Skaughtto on Nov 28, 2011 10:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, part of being a pro is facing the music sometimes.

I’m glad to hear Shurmur is going to address him.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 28, 2011 10:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t need to hear what Greg Little has to say about dropping passes and how he’s battling/learnin, I just need to see him catch passes and score TDs next week. That’ll tell me all I need to know.

Colt is the answer, winning is the question...

by Skaughtto on Nov 28, 2011 11:06 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Not talking to the media on a regular basis would earn him an unprofessional tag. Talking with the media isn’t the important part, showing up to do it is.

Probably just overly frustrated, nothing serious really.

"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur

by LocalMan on Nov 28, 2011 11:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Avoiding the media has nothing to do with how well he plays on Sundays.

Not working on improving his hands in the offseason is the least professional thing he could do.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 12:54 AM EST up reply actions  

If I were a pro athlete I would never talk to the media directly. They aren’t necessary any more, and they very clearly aren’t on your side.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

they very clearly aren’t on your side.

this is an important point. the media is clearly not on the athlete’s side, but not b/c they’re neutral … more b/c they are pitted against the athlete to generate some kind of controversy to make for a good story. professional sports media is virtually useless these days.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Part of the problem is that reporting (in any field) used to be written off as a loss. Now news media is expected to generate revenue like everything else so they have to spice it up more than ever. Not that it didn’t happen in the past, but now everyone does it.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

news reporting should really be a non-profit enterprise, but that’s a different discussion for a different forum.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I would love an OT on this honestly (partly because we talk about this in my masscommunications class too)

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Too political.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I wasn’t expecting it, because I figured it was too political.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 7:13 PM EST up reply actions  

more b/c they are pitted against the athlete to generate some kind of controversy to make for a good story

yep, especially in our 24 hour news cycle. In many instances, journalists would rather get the scoop and get it first, rather than wait for all the facts and be right.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

If I were a pro athlete I would never talk to the media directly.

And you’d lose a lot of money for doing that — league rules for all sports I think (not sure about hockey but who watches that) requires you to talk to the media.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Certain players to. Not just because they ask.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 29, 2011 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok, I amend my statement to say that I would not talk to them any more than contractually obligated and I would never give any real answers to their questions. If people think Mangini and Shurmur are bad I would be ten times worse.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I would do exactly what most athletes and coaches do when they talk to the media… give them bullshit, safe coach-speak answers. I could care less if every media member or fan gets sick of it. If it kept me sane, I would do it my whole career.

"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur

by LocalMan on Nov 29, 2011 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

If people think Mangini and Shurmur are bad I would be ten times worse.

Ditto.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t really care about that. What’s he going to say? “I sucked today, I dropped way too many passes.” There’s nothing much more to say about it.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 12:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Its totally understandable to be so pissed after a subpar performance to not want to talk about it. As he becomes more seasoned both on and off the field, I have no doubt that Little will both catch the damn ball and harness his anger…

by Les Fleurs Du Mal on Nov 29, 2011 11:11 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m not sure that will ever fully eliminate the dropsies. But TO had big problems with this in SF for his first few years, but was able to turn into a beast despite the occasional lapse in focus. It can be done.

And as long as he catches the ball, doesn’t get arrested, is a reliable member of the team (e.g. you can’t rely on someone who is a player conduct suspension risk), doesn’t punt the ball, and doesn’t taunt DBs when he injures them, I’m fine.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I suppose flipping the ball to the opposing teams defensive coordinator is frowned upon as well?

by SBP on Nov 29, 2011 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

While I think it’s hilarious if it’s a Brown doing it, yeah you would probably get a flag for that.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Hasn’t this happened already? And the guy did get a flag for it?

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Probably and I don’t know.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, I thought that was out there. Desean Jackson flipped the ball to the DC on a Sunday night game. He did get flagged for it and caught some heat from everybody about it. I was trying to throw some sarcasm in my previous comment. it failed

by SBP on Dec 1, 2011 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, that’s the play I was thinking of. I remember seeing it in the highlights of the game. Talk about lapse in judgement…

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Dec 1, 2011 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I actually like it when someone thumbs their nose at the media. Especially in a situation like this where everyone saw what he did on the field. Why the heck do we need the media to analyze and comment on this? We all saw it. I think we have too much media in every aspect of society: politics, sports, entertainment… you name it. It taints everything we do. It is often just a big gossip machine looking for the dirt and the worst in people. Whenever you are close to a story (like you have a friend involved) that gets national media you see just how wrong they are and how they slant a story for entertainment appeal… they do it every time.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Nov 29, 2011 11:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Unfortunately, the current media cycle/structure is never going away and will only get more involved with everything we do. Players and coaches are supposed to play along… if not, they face retribution in the form of negative press.

Imagine Mary Kay or Kenny Roda asking you questions after work each day. I wouldn’t want to show up either.

"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur

by LocalMan on Nov 29, 2011 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

If I got paid like they do, I’d be happy to show up regardless

by bbstirrd on Nov 29, 2011 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

If Grossi and Mary Kay continue to hold grudges against players who don’t want to talk to them after the game or against coaches that don’t want to give them the juicy tidbits they desire, then they will continue to hemorrhage readers.

Reporters can talk about what happens on the field and grow up when it comes to their personal business.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

i’ve been saying for a long time: 24-hour coverage of anything is sucky

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I used to check the PD daily for updates, but haven’t been over there for a long, long time.

The real shame is that the majority of readers can’t tell the difference between a piece of news and a gossip/pot stirring article. Most readers are more concerned with the gossip which means a boost of integrity isn’t going to happen any time soon.

If I got paid like they do, I’d be happy to show up regardless

This doesn’t make MKC, Grossi, Roda, ect.. any less obnoxious or bearable as human beings. Greg Little doesn’t make a ton of money either (relatively speaking).

"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur

by LocalMan on Nov 29, 2011 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I really hope this doesn’t become a trend. If he can learn to catch the ball, he can become a very good receiver, esp because of his great YAC potential

by tr1betime on Nov 28, 2011 8:43 PM EST reply actions  

Someone buy that guy a Jugs machine for Christmas.

Dawgs By Nature: Where we're only 6 wins away from the post-season.

by Adrock2099 on Nov 28, 2011 9:05 PM EST reply actions  

Its funny, “jugs” stood for “Judgment Under God” at my friends Catholic High School. They used to get them for misdemeanors and such. I keep picturing an angry nun firing demerit slips at players.

by BiggieBrown on Nov 28, 2011 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I am to inept to put an “I see what you did there” graphic up, but I do indeed see what you did there.

by BiggieBrown on Nov 28, 2011 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

In addition, firing the JUJT would result in the total flattening of everything within fifty miles of the horrifying yet unbelievably awesome machine.

by BiggieBrown on Nov 28, 2011 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Can we set this up just outside Pittsburgh?

by BornAKardiacKid on Nov 28, 2011 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Just give me a "get the hell out of town warning first.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 29, 2011 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

^warning" first.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 29, 2011 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Do they have the JUJT option in MW3?

"The rush of battle is a potent and almost lethal addiction, for war is a drug."

by dirtyjoe on Nov 29, 2011 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Hallelujah!

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 29, 2011 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

uhh? st johns jesuit??

by nickmar19 on Nov 28, 2011 11:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Jugs machines don’t help that much because most drops are mental. No pressure in practice.

by HenryDawg on Nov 28, 2011 10:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly. It’s not as simple as “buy a jugs machine.”

by johnf34 on Nov 28, 2011 10:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think Little is a headcase or anything, he should be able to get over having a bad drop game. I think he just needs a ton more reps at the position.

"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur

by LocalMan on Nov 28, 2011 11:31 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s as simple as “get so many reps in that catching the football is so easy that even in the pressure-packed environment of a game catching the football is still easy.”

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 12:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Buy a jugs machine and hire a LB to drill him whenever he catches it?

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 29, 2011 11:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 29, 2011 1:15 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Best commercials ever.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

The idea though is to build muscle memory… Like soldiers using fine motor skills to manipulate little nuances in their weapon, even while under fire.

"It is unlikely that anyone has ever read Nietzsche or Derrida and has been inspired to open a soup kitchen"

by troy145 on Nov 28, 2011 11:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Catching a football is the exact same thing as field stripping your weapon in combat is what I’m trying to say

"It is unlikely that anyone has ever read Nietzsche or Derrida and has been inspired to open a soup kitchen"

by troy145 on Nov 28, 2011 11:29 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I got ya. I think repetition is definitely important and the JUGs will help him, but I worry that if it gets in his head none of that will matter.

by HenryDawg on Nov 28, 2011 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

i definitely can’t see any difference.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Come one, you can’t think we’re that stupid.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:11 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Rec for typo.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

AHH MEANT TO CLICK REC NOT HIDE!

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I think his YAC potential is the most exciting part of Little’s development. You gotta catch the ball before you can run with it, however, so I hope he can clean this up over the last few games and this off season.

I still think not having a full off season really negatively affected some of our rookies, and I would include Colt in that group. They had to learn a new offense “on the fly” so to speak. Even the defensive rookies probably suffered. Who knows, maybe they could of switched Sheard’s position in the preseason if they had more time to work together.

I think Taylor and Sheard’s performance without a full off season is an great sign of their potential anyway. Wow, accidental long post to say I agree with tribetime.

by BiggieBrown on Nov 28, 2011 9:05 PM EST reply actions  

… Even though Taylor tends to disapear for games like last…

by -bobby- on Nov 29, 2011 8:35 AM EST up reply actions  

maybe they could of switched Sheard’s position

Switched Sheard’s position? To what? And why? He seems to be doing great so far.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 29, 2011 9:21 AM EST up reply actions  

He and Mitchell switched positions before Mitchell lost his job.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 29, 2011 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah he went from right to left I think, and started doing much better.

by BiggieBrown on Nov 29, 2011 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t get to see most of the game as I was driving back to Columbus, but they mentioned over on Cleveland Frowns that some of the drops were due to bad throws more than actual drops – specifically the 3rd down pass at the end of the game going behind Little while he had a defender draped on him. Thoughts?

by hanover fist on Nov 28, 2011 9:36 PM EST reply actions  

I didn’t see it go behind Little on that last throw. It actually looked like it hit him right in the stomach. I did see a some major interference that the refs didn’t call.

Overall, McCoy threw a some off target, but some of Little’s drops were thrown right on the money.

by BiggieBrown on Nov 28, 2011 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

specifically the 3rd down pass at the end of the game going behind Little while he had a defender draped on him. Thoughts?

This has been discussed in the other thread. It was a good throw by McCoy. Bad missed PI call.
Here. Take a look.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 28, 2011 10:02 PM EST up reply actions  

OK, yeah, those pics are better than the ones on Frowns. Yeah, that does look like a good throw. I’d hesitate to place much blame on Little though, based on the screencaps at least. Thanks for the link.

by hanover fist on Nov 28, 2011 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

You have it just about right here

Google “Mangenius Interrupted” and you’ll get an even better flavor.

I’d just add here, as I’ve noted elsewhere, that I wish I could be as sunny as you guys are about the “progress” of a team that’s played at least twice as poorly as last year’s edition did, against a slate of opponents that’s at least twice as weak as that faced last season, yet with a roster that’s significantly better. Especially after having been told that the last coach “didn’t win enough,” and that this year there’d be “no excuses.”

Also, the profile of the person who posted the deleted comment discussed below contained a link to a facebook page that was headlined with personal attacks on the author of the site. That’s why all posts by that author were deleted.

Anyway, the ball was gunned at Little’s back hip on a crossing route. He had to slow down open his hip and reach back to catch it. It could have been a worse throw, but it’s hard to put that “drop” on Little.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

When you can show me the stats that prove we’re playing “twice as poorly,” in other words, our PPG is half last year’s, our YPG is half last year’s, etc., then I will believe you. Until then, I will live with the apparently mistaken opinion that the Browns have actually shown some progress this year.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

we were 20th in football outsider’s rankings last year. 26th this year. I am not a math major, but that’s not “twice as poorly”

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Here are a few stats for you that strike me as much more important than PPG/YPG in which last year’s Browns are at least twice as good as this year’s:

1) Number of games in which the team wasn’t remotely competitive.

2) (Related) Number of games in which the team was down 3 scores by the third quarter.

3) Number of games in which the team was embarrassed by trick plays, penalties, or otherwise looked completely unprepared to play a football game.

4) Wins against playoff teams.

5) Competitive performances against playoff teams.

By my count last year’s edition is blowing this year’s out of the water on every one of these measures, which all seem much more important to me than PPG/YPG. By these measures, “twice as poorly” is an understatement.

Also, re: Football Outsiders rankings, I believe after the Jets game they had the Browns as high as 15 or so. Let’s see where they finish this season.

QED. Thanks for reading.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

1. Please give actual number of games.
2. See #1.
3. Mangini was a more disciplined coach, and penalty yardage showed this, as did special teams play. The rest of your assertion is hyperbole and opinion, however.
4. Granted, yes. However, the Browns lost several games against beatable opponents. As exciting as it was to beat NO and NE and almost beat NYJ, the drop off in performance against supposedly beatable teams was the true measuring stick of success over 2 years. A team that consistently plays at the standard of its opponent is generally not a good team. A high quality team plays at its own standard regardless of opponent. While we have not seen enough of Shurmur’s performance in this regard, I think it’s safe to say Mangini’s regime did not beat the middle-of-the-road teams consistently over 2 years to warrant further consideration.
5. Please be specific.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

“The drop off in performance against supposedly beatable teams was the true measuring stick of success over 2 years. …. I think it’s safe to say Mangini’s regime did not beat the middle-of-the-road teams consistently over 2 years to warrant further consideration.”

Pffft. By the time last year’s team even played any “supposedly beatable teams” it was Week 11 when injuries had completely riddled an already perilously thin roster, especially to Fujita, Smith and Wright on defense. Throw in the rotating carousel of JV quarterbacks and the fact that Colt turned garbage once there was a little tape on him and the point becomes even clearer.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

By the time last year’s team even played any "supposedly beatable teams" it was Week 11 when injuries had completely riddled an already perilously thin roster

Have you checked this team’s injury report this year? If you think injuries were a problem last year…well…

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

So injuries matter in 2010 but not 2011? I’d say the injuries to Steinbach, Pashos, Hillis, Hardesty, and Ward mattered to this season’s team at least, and by most people’s measures more, than the injuries you mentioned last season. At least the team knew its schemes in 2010 well enough to be somewhat comfortable.

And the Bucs, Chiefs, and Bengals were all early games that were winnable last year.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 5:12 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Fujita was the lynchpin of the defense last year as the signal caller, and was much more important in that role b/c the defensive schemes/calls were more complex (you’ll recall that last year’s Browns were actually able to confuse Hall of Fame quarterbacks in their prime). Losing Fujita was huge. Losing Wright for those few games at the end forced Costanzo and Ventrone into the secondary, which was huge as well. And last year’s defensive line was much thinner than this year’s. Losing Smith killed.

Steinbach was a big hit, but I don’t think you’re talking about nearly as big a delta on the rest.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, Fujita was the lynchpin and important. The Browns confused some good QBs and didn’t confuse too many others last year. Wright, for all the promise he showed in 2009, was absolutely horrendous last year and not as important to the defense as we all wished he were.

Losing Steinbach, Hillis, Hardesty, Pashos, Ward this year still seems clearly more injurious to the performance of the team overall than losing Fujita last year.

You chose to conveniently ignore the portion of my argument about the winnable games in the early portion of last year, especially since the team had just come off a nice winning streak at the end of the previous year.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 5:30 PM EST up reply actions  

turned out that the bucs and chiefs weren’t actually all that “winnable”, though, right? i mean, the games were in hand, but those were both 10-6 teams last year.

i think those games speak more to the greater overall competitiveness, and especially competitiveness against good teams, of the 2010 browns than anything.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 6:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Is ex-post facto record the only measure of a team’s strength? How are those former 10-6 teams this year? I remember outplaying both teams only to lose, similarly to how we outplayed Cinci during the first game only to lose. I viewed both those games last year as winnable at the time, and that’s why I described them as such.

Further, a majority of this blog thought similarly, especially coming off those 4 wins at the end of 2009.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 10:07 PM EST up reply actions  

without spending the time to go back and check, i believe each of those teams came out of the gate pretty hot, and continued onto be playoff-caliber teams. again, my point really is that the fact that we had 4th quarter leads in both games speaks to how truly competitive the 2010 team was.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 1, 2011 12:43 AM EST up reply actions  

I see your point. It just seems to me that some of the folks who are strongly in favor of last year’s version of our team downplay the minor successes of this year’s team while giving the benefit of the doubt to 2010’s squad’s inadequacies in any and all instances. Please keep in mind that I was originally replying to Frowns regarding this subject.

by chitown browns fan on Dec 1, 2011 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

There’s no doubt we were more competitive last year. Still, it’s apples and oranges.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:20 AM EST up reply actions  

agreed on both counts.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 1, 2011 12:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Pffft. By the time last year’s team even played any "supposedly beatable teams" it was Week 11 when injuries had completely riddled an already perilously thin roster

Good thing this year’s team has faced no injuries what so ever.

This is sarcasm by the way.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 30, 2011 6:14 PM EST up reply actions  

number 3 is totally irrelevant to measuring how good overall this team is, outside of the actual results they have caused.

The Browns last year were one of the oldest teams in the league. Unless the coach was flat out awful, you should be able to have less stupid screw-ups than one of the youngest teams in the league (which the Browns are now). Its more of a measure of the experience of the team which is a factor in how good they are overall, but not a measure of how good a team is.

Also, re: Football Outsiders rankings, I believe after the Jets game they had the Browns as high as 15 or so. Let’s see where they finish this season.

And at our highest point, the 2011 Browns were ~23rd. So similar change. It will be important to see however what they do for the rest of the season.

hich all seem much more important to me than PPG/YPG. By these measures

you talk about PPG/YPG multiple times, but Football Outsiders doesn’t rely on that. They rely a lot on measuring plays and valuing players/teams on a per-play basis and then adjusting to SoS. The fact that it uses SoS supports part of your argument about the Browns facing easier teams, which is why they are ranked a bit lower.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I was just responding to someone else’s point about PPG/YPG, and I’m not the one who brought the FBO rankings into it either.

The above stats I cite are much more important and speak for themselves.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d say the stats above are just as valuable as rankings by FBO, or PFF, or any football sabremetrics website, especially those that consider SoS

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I pointed this out elsewhere, but I really think you need to compare this year with Mangini’s first.

Yes, we probably have better players. But they are better, younger players. While Mangini wanted to acquire and play less-talented veteran players who “wouldn’t lose” games for us to begin his reign, Shurmur and H&H seem to have the opposite franchise-building strategy. We will be talented and get better as our players grow under HSH, we would have lost/won a lot of close, ugly games and gotten better as younger more talented picks earned their starting spots or emerged from UDFA under Mangini. Mangini’s early roster was vulnerable to solid opposing talent but not trick plays, quick snaps, etc. Shurmur’s group is young and vulnerable to those things, but has more talent and is able to be better, only inconsistently.

Also like I said elsewhere, in year I of Mangini, we SUUUUUCCCKKKED to begin the year. We were 1-11. And that 1 we won was the wind bowl against the Bills. We looked completely awful.

Yes, Mangini had an incredible streak to end that year, and that victory over the steelers was great. But for most of the year, we were as unwatchable as, say, f*&ing up FG snaps, or allowing punt return TDs.

This Browns team is just now learning to compete. It has looked as bad as any other year I of a rebuild, and it will grow. How much and how quickly remains to be seen, and will ultimately be how we should judge HSH.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:19 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I think we are conflating Mangini as a GM and Mangini as a coach at this point though. Mangini as coach with Heckert as GM, compared to our current setup is the better comparison. Also, why like you said, it’s apples and oranges.

by Roger Dorn on Dec 1, 2011 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

I mean at some point you have to consider the philosophy that the man brought, don’t you? I agree that we are kind of bringing in Heckert/Holmgren’s vision a little when you start thinking about how to build, but Mangini was operating in a rebuilding mode as well.

Basically even if you ignore specific player acquisition and credit/discredit for who brought what player in, both coaches operated with a similar roster. Similar in that you would expect their roster to have a significant weakness due to rebuilding.

Dissimilar in that Mangini’s roster you would expect to be “pros” and to not cause dumb penalties, not mess up ST, etc. and Shurmur’s roster you would expect to make some great plays but also make a lot of mistakes as a young team.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for clarifying on the deleted post. I think many people are wary of censored posts on forums like these, and while it’s your site and your discretion, it may be helpful to disclaim reasons for deleting posts when you do so.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

so because someone posts on their facebook that they personally dislike the writing of you, you are going to delete their comments?

It was not attacking the man, if you read closely, but attacking the style of writing. That’s not a personal attack, that is called criticism. there is a difference and hopefully you can see it.

Dogmatic, belittling those who disagree

These are less personal attacks and more criticisms of the post itself. Please distinguish between the two.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Mmmhmmm… “Cleveland Frowns is a terrible writer … he’s Rush Limbaugh … derp derp derp.”

Sorry, bud. I’ve got no obligation to leave links to that sort of thing up at my site.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 4:41 PM EST up reply actions  

he’s Rush Limbaugh … derp derp derp."

now I’ve got another…He strawmans people and exaggerates their points and nauseum to belittle them. derp derp derp…

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 4:53 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

We’ve tried, but found it’s best to let it roam free

like the internet has done to Cleveland Frowns?

I kid, I kid.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it goes for anyone.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

You can’t stop the Bross.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Dec 1, 2011 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

The people here are not overly sunny in the least bit about the new regime. We are not just batsh!t insane about the old one being the greatest thing ever, even if many of us thought that Mangini did a good job.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 30, 2011 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

re: “batshit insane” it’s much less about thinking the old regime was the greatest thing ever, and much more about what a thoroughly dishonest shake it got from the press, from Lerner himself, then from Holmgren.

That it was making the progress that it was last year only made it worse.

What can I say, I hate lying. And I hate it much more when billion dollar institutions propagate it. Call me crazy.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

i’ve not read your site, but based on what i’ve gathered from you and others about the site i’m curious as to what good you think it does to continually recall the mangini-era teams when discussing the current and future browns? i agree with you that mangini was given an all-time raw deal, and that mangini had the team headed in the right direction, but dwelling on that doesn’t do anyone any good at this stage, does it?

what we know now is that the 2011 browns have full “organizational alignment” — whatever that means — from the president through to the coordinators. as such, aren’t we in a better position in 2011 than we were in 2010 if only for the fact that everyone is playing out of the same playbook, scouting for the same systems, and working toward the same goal?

mangini and the holmgren people weren’t going to work. that much was always, is, and will continue to be clear. i’ve said 1,000 times on this site that as soon as holmgren was brought in they should have shitcanned mangini b/c those philosophies were not going to co-exist. now, however, we have an unified philosophy in the building, which has to be a positive, no?

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 6:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Grossi and Mary Kay hated Mangini from before he was hired, but do you really think some of the things you’ve said are not being overly generous to Mangini? At all?

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:23 AM EST up reply actions  

It’s team chemistry as it has been all year. QB is supposed to “slow down” a WR against zone and not lead him into a huge hit. WR is supposed to feel zone coverage and gear down a little bit. Drew Brees is the best at this.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

drew brees really is awesome, isn’t he? did you watch monday night this week? dude is incredible.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you not see similarities between second year Brees and second year McCoy? I do and with much worse receivers.

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

That there are correlations doesn’t mean Colt will become great all of a sudden.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:24 AM EST up reply actions  

i see pretty much zero similarities, though my memory of brees in his second year is spotty at best.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 1, 2011 12:45 AM EST up reply actions  

sorry, that’s not fair. they are both short and both from texas. i see those similarities.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 1, 2011 12:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Heh heh, this made me laugh.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Dec 1, 2011 8:21 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t remember much of Brees back then, but I could certainly imagine, given the stats etc. that Colt could / probably is performing similarly to what Brees was doing back then (although I also don’t recall the supporting cast Brees had so can’t comment on that).

I do think McCoy has some of the same “intangibles” (take that to mean what you want), is a natural at throwing the ball with good fundamental mechanics and quick release, has excellent mobility, and a very, very good head on his shoulders. Impossible to have any idea at this point if McCoy could ever “be another Drew Brees”, but I have to admit that the Drew Brees analogy, as simplistic as it may be, is a valid reason to have some optimism for Colt.

More specifically, the most common and consistent basis for doubts on McCoy are based on the simple fact of his height. The fact remains that Brees is 6’0", is a super bowl caliber QB, and is one of the top 3 or 4 QBs in the NFL two years running. (I should probably also point out that Aaron Rodgers is 6’2"…).

So I do think that the fact that a guy who is about an inch – inch and a half shorter than Colt can do what Brees is doing can also, justifiably, be the basis for some hope that Colt could potentially become an elite QB eventually, contrary to those who say his height will be something that constitutes and absolute limitation of him ever being one.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Dec 1, 2011 8:53 AM EST up reply actions  

He’s f*&%g ridiculous.

Ridiculous.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Holy crap is that why I got the 503 error, an error I never knew existed because of the colision of Cleveland Frowns and DBN?

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 10:27 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

He deleted a comment that linked to those pictures that BOB linked to above by the way.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Frowns is the master of revisionist history. A jackass and a fraud, plain and simple.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 29, 2011 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I know not of this Frowns thing. Guess I’ll check out what you guys are talking about.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 29, 2011 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

TDSH’s comment above is a perfect satire.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 4:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I read one story and that was enough for me.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 29, 2011 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

This is horsesh!t. I put up a post on your site that did not criticize your analysis in the least bit and just linked to BOAB’s pictures and said that it also looked like pass interference. I don’t have a facebook page. You deleted my comment. And you also apparently deleted bross’s comment. It’s your site and you can delete whatever you want, but be honest about it when you come here.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 30, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m being perfectly honest. As noted in the fanshot, it looks like you’re missing that when a post reaches a certain number of comments on the DISQUS system, you have to click the button at the bottom of the post to see the rest of them. Someone named "Jon" posted a link to a photo like the one you’re talking about which I assume is you. I didn’t delete it, I actually responded to it. And if that’s not you, why would I have deleted yours and not have deleted his? Here’s the link to the specific comment: http://www.clevelandfrowns.com/2011/11/browns-blow-chance-for-big-win-v-bengals-colt-mccoy-keeps-killing-case-for-long-term-job-in-cleveland/#comment-374606617

Even if you click that link, you’ll still have to scroll down to click on the "load more comments" button to see my response, which was just to say: “Agreed re: pass interference but you tend to not get that call on bullet throws to covered receivers like that. The real point is that it’s hard to call that a "drop" for Little.”

Also, yeah, bross is the one whose facebook page I’m talking about as noted above.

So please remove the tinfoil hat now. Thank you.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I really don’t care about any deleted comments. And that’s not why I went to your site. I just wanted to see what your site was.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 30, 2011 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Seems a little harsh. He has his own blog and he is entitled to write what he wants. No one would read it if he wasn’t at least a smart guy or could write well. Disagree with his assertions, but he has strong opinions.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Deleting posts from a blogger of images that clearly dispute the ones he posted? That’s just plain censorship of other people’s views and what I’d call the very definition of revisionist history. Unacceptable and inexcusable.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 29, 2011 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Private blog that he owns.

He gets to do whatever the hell he wants.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 29, 2011 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree, he can do whatever he wants. Certainly doesn’t help his credibility, though.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 29, 2011 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

While true, doesn’t mean it’s cool.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

exactly. he can do all the stuff he does legally. he is still a dick

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Private blog that he owns.
He gets to do whatever the hell he wants.

DBN, a public blog where I get to call Frowns a blathering, misleading hot air balloon if I want.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 29, 2011 8:44 PM EST up reply actions  

At least it’s better than a twitter fight.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 10:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Aw sh#t $on, it b gøin dwn. #awesomeness

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

What the hell? The pic he shows is the ball in mid flight and he says it was 4 yards behind Little? I’m never going to that site again.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 29, 2011 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh and Dalton hit Green in stride. This guy’s hyperbole sounds like a more sophisticated cleveland.com.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 4:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed that you probably should never go to that site again

until you learn how to read.

The post doesn’t say it was “4 yards behind Little” it says the ball was gunned behind Little when he was “four-yards short of the first down marker on third-and-10 with a defender draped all over him.”

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, you’re right. Must have got my thoughts mixed up. And I won’t go to your site. There’s really no reason to.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 30, 2011 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

2.2 million pageviews and counting disagree, along with Joe Posnanski, Eric Wright’s dad, Greg Little and others, but it’s your world, bud. Enjoy the darkness.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Plenty of people watch ESPN too, and that’s met with a lot of criticism as well.

It’s great that your site has the page views. Congratulations. (I say that with sincerity.) But people can have differing opinions. Is Eric Wright’s dad the end all be all of journalism reviews?

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Is Eric Wright’s dad the end all be all of journalism reviews?

if we are using this as an end all be all of journalism reviews, I am scared for the future of the industry.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Believe it or not, I’ve gotten good reviews from more than Eric Wright’s dad. “Testimonials” are on the sidebar that should make that clear. I agree that it’s not all about the pageviews.

Alright, it’s been real fun here. Will see you guys around.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, I’ve seen them. I just found it amusing that you chose to cite Eric Wright’s father.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Pff. If you’re here to promote your lil’ site, you can leave.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 30, 2011 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe what you say to be true, I guess I’d like to see his answer to why he did it.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Because they were obviously photoshopped by evil Mangini hating terrorists.

Dawgs By Nature: Where we're only 6 wins away from the post-season.

by Adrock2099 on Nov 29, 2011 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Possibly, if he does stuff like this, he will have to answer to it at some point.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

The funny thing is that most of the people on this site were moderately pro-Mangini. There were few, if any, rabid anti-Mangini people. All things being equal, I thought he deserved a third year, but I understand the decision to go in a different direction. And it’s not like we fired Vince Lombardi. The irony of it all is that Mangini himself seemed to be totally at peace with it, and I think it probably made sense for everyone. The front office and him had different ideas of how to build a football team — not that either side was doing it the right way, just different ways. Broadly speaking, the Walsh way or the Parcells way. Both ways work, but you have to commit to one because they are very different. I don’t think it was going to work out in the long term so I guess it was best to cut bait now.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 4:40 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I felt he deserved a third year for the fact that firing any coach after two years isn’t going to get you anywhere, unless that coach is totally awful.

But if he is such a great coach as some feel he is, he would be coaching now. Unless ESPN is that much better of a career move.

"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur

by LocalMan on Nov 29, 2011 4:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Can’t find it at the moment, but I remember reading he was offered assistant jobs around the league as well as at least one college HC position but turned them down. Working for ESPN is a hell of a lot less stressful and not a whole lot less profitable.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 5:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Really? Interesting… Yeah, an ESPN gig would be pretty cozy compared coaching in the NFL. And they pay their talking heads handsomely, I believe.

"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur

by LocalMan on Nov 29, 2011 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

He reportedly turned down the Titans and Eagles for DC job. Don’t think he was interviewed for Head coach and I am positive he would have taken a head coaching job.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 6:25 PM EST up reply actions  

If I remember right it was at some small school, maybe even whatever they’re calling the second tier of division 1 nowadays.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:12 PM EST up reply actions  

his name was tossed around as a HC candidate for uconn, since he’s from CT.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

He would be an excellent NCAA coach

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

no doubt. he would kill it in college.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 9:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know if he could recruit.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s true, not top talent anyway. He could definitely get Big East talent

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 11:10 PM EST up reply actions  

you can hire great recruiters. he would run an awesome program.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he would be an outstanding college coach, and he may be a great recruiter. I just don’t know about that, we’ve heard too many conflicting reports about his personality.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh sorry I thought you meant NFL, the college rumor was UConn.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought he deserved a third year, but I understand the decision to go in a different direction. And it’s not like we fired Vince Lombardi.

This is kinda where I’m at too.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:25 PM EST up reply actions  

the thing that still bugs me most is the bullshit year that they strung mangini and the fans along. they should have just whacked him when they got to town.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it was a savvy move, essentially buying yourself a year. For a fanbase that isn’t completely as frustrated as ours, it would probably be working brilliantly.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 6:31 PM EST up reply actions  

one man’s savvy is another man’s bullshit … i’m not saying holmgren wasn’t shrewd to do it, but that doesn’t mean i don’t think it was a bogus move.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha I was being facetious.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it was a savvy move, essentially buying yourself a year.

It may be naive of me, but I think Holmgren was genuine in going another year. After the 4 game winning streak, Holmgren the coach was impressed and thought the guy earned at least another year.

I think what probably happened then is that reality set in around draft time when he realized that his/Heckert’s type of players and Mangini’s type of players were just not going to mesh. Look at the guys they did draft high — all guys who work in any system. DBs, an RB, a flyer on a QB and a O Guard. Those guys are not going to be very influenced by 3-4, 4-3 or the type of offense you run. Note that the one d-lineman they drafted, they cut. Compare that to us holding onto Mitchell and all the late round draft picks from this year.

After reality set in, I figure Holmgren just figured that if Eric pulled off a great season under the circumstances — at least 500 — he’d keep him, but if he didn’t, it just wasn’t going to work out between them because they are not on the same page.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

given that they were never, ever going to get on the same page, unless mangini somehow morphed into belichick, the longer they kept mangini around the more they were just kicking the can down the road.

i would have loved to keep mangini for a while, but it should have ended as soon as holmgren stepped in the door. i have a very hard time believing that holmgren’s mental white board said, “2 possible avenues to success: 1. mangini sticks around and does it in a way with which neither tom heckert, nor gill haskell, nor i are even remotely familiar, 2. we clean house and go WCO/4-3 and build how everyone in a position of influence knows how to build”

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 9:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Holmgren was genuine in going another year. After the 4 game winning streak, Holmgren the coach was impressed and thought the guy earned at least another year.

100% agree.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Then you are agreeing that Holmgren needs to be replaced. If that win streak is all that made him retain Mangini I want him gone yesterday. A professional should have been able to see that it was all smoke and mirrors.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 11:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea that’s my issue here. Shouldn’t have been a tough choice if entering year 2 it was about systems meshing whereas year 1 was about a 4 game win streak.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Who cares what the reason was? He was given another year to show improvement and finished with the exact same record. See ya.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 11:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Record doesn’t necessarily reflect improvement. Once again, if Holmgren doesn’t know this, he needs to be replaced yesterday.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 11:23 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Agree again. If you can’t distinguish between 2009 and 2010, then you are either
a. Tony Grossi
or b. someone that shouldn’t be making decisions for the Browns

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah the difference was that in 2009 we were never in games and 2010 we gave them away at the end. We couldn’t finish anything consistently.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

But it can, and they ended that year strongly. Again, you want to support Mangini, say he should have gotten a fair chance and when he did, he failed.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d say he succeeded given the talent he had to work with and the schedule we had last year.

You will get no argument that Mangini should not be in charge of personnel but that’s not my debate.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:35 PM EST up reply actions  

2 years in a COMPLETE tear down/rebuild is anything but a fair chance.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

it matters b/c 2010 was a completely wasted year. completely.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

HOW DID YOU GET IN MY BRAIN?!

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

#killing it

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Ironically I hated Mangini from the start but usually enjoy Frowns. Even his “Mangini’s firing caused the Mayan apocalypse posts are pretty good reads.”

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

he also has the power of editing comments he doesn’t like.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

YAY CAPS LOCK!

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, that was me actually (unless someone else did it).

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m shocked /sarc.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 29, 2011 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh yeah, that makes perfect sense because the reason AJ Green put together that 50 yard reception during the final drive was because of a perfect throw.

Colt is the answer, winning is the question...

by Skaughtto on Nov 28, 2011 10:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually, according to Frowns that was a perfect throw by Dalton that hit Green in stride. Seriously. The guy has lost his f-cking mind. Someone needs to conduct an intervention. I nominate Pokorny — Frownie seems to respect this site as he links to it, at least when he thinks something written here supports his Mangini conspiracy theories.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep, I read that and was like wtf.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

If Green wasn’t hit in some kind of “stride” then how’d he come down with the ball and run another 35 yards with it? Was a good throw.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

how’d he come down with the ball

Here’s how.

The throw wasn’t bad, considering he was about to get hit. It was a bit behind him though. And it was overthrown – about 6 feet over Green’s head. Green was running toward us on his route here – had to stop in his tracks, leap straight up and bend backwards. Luckily for Dalton, he has a receiver who has a long body, long arms and about a 42" vertical leap, and hands as good as any WR in the NFL and better than the vast majority.

Green is far from the only receiver in the league who catches it in that position
(from your article)
Seriously? No way. There are maybe two or three guys – named Green, Johnson, and maybe Fitzgerald. That’s about it.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 1:45 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Also Haden was picked after the catch by the two other players in the picture. If they aren’t there, Haden has a shot to bring him down within five yards.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 30, 2011 2:30 PM EST up reply actions  

So basically, the catch was in-stride, and AJ Green “strides” 10 feet in the air.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Seriously, Green is going to be a nightmare. Let’s hope it is a “Chad Johnson on a horrible team, put forth by a horrible franchise that keeps drafting players that will get arrested/suspended” nightmare.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:26 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m praying for a bad ego to kick in. The kid is going to be a handful for years to come.

by Brownie's Year on Dec 1, 2011 12:47 AM EST up reply actions  

With his back arched. Essentially he is Scott Stapp, hovering above the field, back arched messianically.

"It is unlikely that anyone has ever read Nietzsche or Derrida and has been inspired to open a soup kitchen"

by troy145 on Nov 30, 2011 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

then how’d he come down with the ball and run another 35 yards with it?

oh, there was some pretty poor coverage on that play and it wasn’t too hard. He had to turn, stop a bit, and then jump because it was over 10 feet in the air.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

it was a great play. period.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

yep. When I saw Green make that play, I was thinking “Randy moss”.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 2:22 PM EST up reply actions  

See burntorange’s response.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

The other funny thing about it is that Dalton got cruched by Rubin on the play and still made the throw, whereas Colt has a defender come at him in the same way and can’t even manage to throw the ball away when he’s five yards from the sideline.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

If Colt throws the ball you see above, you would be all over him for making him stop dead in his tracks and overthrowing his receiver by six feet.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with this sentiment. Dalton makes this throw and we’re giving him props for sticking in there and tossing up a jump ball. Everyone here would be bashing Colt for not tucking the ball and running or throwing it away.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Dalton did get crushed on the play directly after the throw and deserves credit for sticking in there; the catch was unreal, however, and not many WRs have the physical attributes to bring that ball down. Like BOAB said, the kid’s fortunate to have those attributes, and not many WRs make that play based on the trajectory of the ball alone. No one on the Steelers, Ravens, or Browns makes that catch.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

No one makes that catch except A.J. Green or Calvin Johnson (and MAYBE Vincent Jackson or Larry Fitzgerald).

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m with you. I was amazed at the time because I thought we were about to sack Dalton. I was about to jump off the couch in happiness but was then paralyzed by the catch and subsequent run. That was the play of the game and a joy/soul-crusher to watch. I gave the first game to Haden and the second to Green and look forward to future match-ups.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

when rubin hit dalton as he was throwing i immediately thought, “pick it!”

not so much.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 2:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, that play was a real punch in the gut. We got to Dalton, should have been a big play for the Browns, but Dalton manages to get off a jump ball right before he gets leveled – just good enough for Green to blast off and show off his absolute f*kng *&^%@ magnificence.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

notice the screenshot that BOAB posted. Green is 6’4’’ and can go up and make an incredible catch. It was a bit underthrown and if the receiver in question was a guy like Little (who is a bit shorter, a bit shorter arms, and doesn’t jump nearly as high), that ball probably goes over the receiver’s head. If you also notice in the screenshot, Dimitri Patterson is in a perfect position for the pick, but Green intervenes.

In short, if they didn’t have AJ green that ALSO would have been an INT, though to be fair not as much off target.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

My thought is that ever since the Michael Silver articles came out where Colt sort of made the Mangini squad look like jerks, Cleveland Frowns has done whatever they can to blame Colt for every and anything.

by HenryDawg on Nov 28, 2011 10:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I had never heard of that blog before, so I went over to check it out and I don’t think he is being fair at all. No one here is saying Colt played the perfect game, but heaping that much blame on him is simply inaccurate.

by BiggieBrown on Nov 28, 2011 10:21 PM EST up reply actions  

He has a vendetta for Colt since he dared to succumb to questions about that crew treating him poorly.

Frowns is a great writer and I like a lot of what he does but his Mangini love is just as apoplectic as Silver’s Mangini hate.

by HenryDawg on Nov 28, 2011 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Henry, check the archives. What you’re saying just isn’t true. I started to really dislike Colt when I saw the association with Flip Flippen and the holographic chips thing. I wrote about it before last April’s draft. Then he wrote the book with his dad about how “godly” they are. I wrote in detail about that, too. I admittedly don’t like Colt for these reasons, and I don’t hide it. I’d also have a much easier time about all of it if he could play football and wouldn’t lie in press conferences about interceptions that he threw.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t care what religion a player is off the field. I don’t hate Tebow because he is passionate about his religion (though how much he broadcasts it, much more than colt, does irk me a tiny bit). I dislike Tebow because of how he has been annointed.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m in the same boat. I’ve told my Tebow-loving friends that I give the guy credit for winning despite being a pretty awful passer and having a 45% or whatever it is now.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Honestly, he’s only got to pass efficiently enough to win. The passing stats bar is lower for him than for Brady or Manning or Brees.

Now, the staying healthy after getting hit by NFL players for a whole season while running like that, that’s another story.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Sure, but I wouldn’t feel great about having a QB who’s completing less than 50% of his throws. Yeah his legs can save him, but as you point out, for how long? Ultimately this is a passing league. And that throwing motion—windup—is still terrible.

by emily522 on Dec 1, 2011 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Ultimately this is a passing league

This is the bottom line really. Michael Vick is the only QB in the modern era who’s come close to making a case for a team being a contender with “a running QB”, and I’m not sure even he has made that case yet, and he’s got an arm that is light years better than Tebow’s will ever be.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Dec 1, 2011 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

*RGIII enters the room.

by Brownie's Year on Dec 1, 2011 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Randall Cunningham and Steve Young too. Both guys learned to operate in the pocket after first relying a ton on their legs, but that is what Vick has done as well and that is how he has become very good.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Dec 1, 2011 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I guess I’m also emphasizing the distinction between a “running QB” and a “mobile QB”.

In today’s NFL, I think there are two models of an elite QB:
1) Call it the “Brady / Manning model”. Not much mobility necessary, because the guy is supremely gifted with his vision of the field and ability to read defenses, cool and calm in the pocket with quick decision making, and a laser sited rifle for an arm. He probably also stands at least 6’4".
2) Call it the “Steve Young model”. Really good accurate arm, pocket presence, intelligence with reading defenses, etc., but can make up for not having the “supreme gift” pocket ability of a Brady or Manning because he has great footwork / mobility / athleticism, and the ability to work outside the pocket.

Aaron Rodgers… perhaps the rare example of a guy who’s got all of the above (even though he’s only 6’2").

Vick fits model #2. Maybe RGIII will too. But this is also why I think Tebow can’t sustain his current successes unless he makes serious improvements with his arm (the point I was making above).

I think the bottom line though is that a QB who ran for 600 yards and 8 TDs per season in college is going to have to learn how to play a different game at the next level. That’s what happened with Vick. And while RGIII is admittedly an amazing all around athlete, he’s not going to be able to run in the NFL like he did in college. Yes, his athleticism will be valuable in his ability to escape pressure and work outside the pocket, but he’s going to have to learn, like Vick did over the years to operate from the pocket.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Dec 1, 2011 9:00 PM EST up reply actions  

listen to Young talk about mobile QBs too. It’s interesting. He believes in being able to play out of the pocket, but he also thinks a QB who can play out of the pocket AND run is extremely valuable.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Dec 1, 2011 9:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, but I still think having a “good arm” (accuracy, quick release and ability to throw downfield) is mandatory.
Tebow is a one hit wonder IMO. Unless he makes huge strides in his throwing ability I’ll be astonished if he continues to have the success he’s having right now.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Dec 1, 2011 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

having a good arm is definitely important.

I don’t care about Tebow. If you want a really good article about Tebow that is harsh, but fair check out the Rolling Stone article on him (trying to find it online, but can’t though).

Tebow isn’t the type of “running QB” I was thinking of anyways. He isn’t much of a threat passing the ball right now.

The reason why Young thought a running QB was so great is it’s almost like having 12 guys on the field. You have an extra running back who can take off at any time, plus he can throw. The defenders need to contain him, but at the same time get in his face and make sure he doesn’t make a good throw.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Dec 2, 2011 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s not the religion that bothers me, it’s the hypocrisy, which is outlined fairly clearly in my review of the book, and is also supported by Colt’s baldfaced lie about his interception last Sunday.

I like Tebow a lot. He strikes me as infinitely more genuine in his faith than Colt is.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Christians aren’t infallible. So Colt lied; let’s crucify him. Saint Tebow has his sins as well, I’m sure.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Just calling a liar a liar is all. For a guy who’s made so much money off his “faith,” it’s especially disappointing.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

One instance. Come on.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m trying to think of another time I’ve heard an NFL quarterback attempt to deflect responsibility with such a baldfaced lie and I’m having a hard time.

Anyway, you like liars better than I do. I get it. We can agree to be different in that way.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:09 PM EST up reply actions  

If you claim that 1 instance of someone telling a lie makes them a complete liar, then I guess everyone in the world is a liar.

I’m not saying Colt should have done it, but damn you’re a harsh critic.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Colt should delete Frowns’ comments.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 30, 2011 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

…attempt to deflect responsibility with such a baldfaced lie…

You’ve gone off the deep end man. What in the name of Sam Hell are you talking about? Your rants about McCoy are ludicrous and hysterical to the point of actually being hilarious.

Wait, that’s it isn’t it? That’s your gig all along. Hahaa, a comedian – kind of like the “unknown comic” on the gong show! Nice!

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 6:08 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I agree with him that McCoy is lying about his interception. The alternative is worse.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 1, 2011 1:53 AM EST up reply actions  

The problem I have with Frowns is the way he turns it into a drama of such epic proportions (going on and on with statements like “such a baldfaced lie…”, etc. not to mention his other crazy rants).

I said it in another thread – I thought McCoy was probably trying to chuck it to Little. Didn’t really think much more of it – partly because I don’t really know, its just my hunch.

Its one thing to make a comment speculating about what Colt was doing on that play, its a whole different thing to call him out with a long winded article on your own blog calling him a bald faced liar, blah blah. It appears Frowns has basically, with a series of his articles, painted McCoy as some kind of scumbag lying kid with a terrible upbringing by a scumbag father – I mean seriously, the guy is ridiculous.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Dec 1, 2011 9:02 AM EST up reply actions  

So you’re problem is the presentation, not the assertions? Because you just called McCoy a liar, just in nicer terms.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 1, 2011 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

It makes a difference, yes. Especially in public discourse. The guy can do whatever he wants on his blog, but his resorting to a writing style better suited to “The Enquirer” is disappointing and destroys his credibility long term. Although, to be fair, credibility isn’t what the guy’s after. Hits on his sight is all that matters. More power to him, but I won’t be visiting.

by chitown browns fan on Dec 1, 2011 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

you’re problem is the presentation, not the assertions

Yes. There’s a huge difference between me making a casual comment that I think he was probably trying to throw to Little on a play (contrary to a comment he made in a press conference), and what Frowns is doing. I don’t know what the hell went on in McCoy’s head on that play. I certainly don’t think the things he said in the press conference are worthy of harsh condemnation. Do you?

Just calling a liar a liar is all. For a guy who’s made so much money off his "faith," it’s especially disappointing…
.
such a baldfaced lie and I’m having a hard time…
.
… you like liars better than I do. I get it…
Seriously? Frowns is basically completely trashing McCoy as a guy lacking in just about every possible personal aspect with all of his comments, not just the “bald faced liar” comments. The stuff about Colt not being “genuine about his religion”, crap about how his Dad moved him around to different schools when he was a kid, blah, blah ad nauseum.

If you don’t see the difference, I can’t help you.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Dec 1, 2011 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

So you’re problem is the presentation, not the assertions

when the presentations are sensationalized and over the top, I don’t see what is the problem with not wanting to read that and not thinking it’s that good.

There are a lot of writers/pundits/bloggers out there that while I may sometimes agree with them, they sensationalize stories and blow them up in a similar sense and I don’t enjoy reading/listening to them.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Dec 1, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I like Tebow a lot. He strikes me as infinitely more genuine in his faith than Colt is.

Why? Because he proclaims it 24/7?

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

That might be part of it. Also because he didn’t write such a terrible book, and I’ve never heard him lie about his interceptions either.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

He’s written a book, I believe. Never read it though. Didn’t read Colt’s either.

I don’t think you should judge people’s faith based on how loud they shout it, but I’ll stop here. We have “politics” rules on here, which are necessary.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Google “the definitive review of growing up Colt” and make sure to click through to the Scene column if you want to try to understand where I’m coming from.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, no one cares enough to write 400 comments about me here. It’s amazing how little caring is going on, actually.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, no one cares enough to write 400 comments about me here

200 of which are you instigating comments about yourself.

Oh, so humble.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 5:13 PM EST up reply actions  

No one cares if Colt wrote a “horrible” book. You are using that to defend your dislike for the kid.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 30, 2011 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah who gives a crap.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Also because he didn’t write such a terrible book,

So you like Tebow a lot better because he can dictate his life better to a ghostwriter in your opinion? Even though from everything I read, Tebow’s book didn’t reveal much more than what people already knew?

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Lets be real; if any QB writes a book at the ripe age of ~25, it’s going to be horrible.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:29 AM EST up reply actions  

What’s the big hypocrisy? That they wrote the book for money and not to stop the speaking engagements? First of all, that is only in a tiny section while the rest takes slight jabs at Colt (ergo, it wasn’t outlined all that clearly). Second, I don’t consider it a huge hypocrisy.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the more profound and overarching hypocrisy was the “don’t prepare the path for your son” message coming from the guy who hopped school districts so he could make sure he could be the head coach of his son’s team and that he played with “awesome athletes,” etc.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Hm, maybe some of this was out of Colt’s hands? I haven’t read the book, so please enlighten me. Sometimes fathers get out of control with this sports stuff and the kid doesn’t have a choice in the matter.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

…the more profound and overarching hypocrisy was the "don’t prepare the path for your son" message coming from the guy who hopped school districts so he could make sure he could be the head coach of his son’s team and that he played…
BLAH, BLAH BLAH

Holy Christ I don’t think I’ve ever heard so much bullshit in all my life.
Do you research the life history of every NFL player to see if you like him or not? I think I mentioned this in another comment so apologies if I’m being redundant, but you’ve gone off the proverbial DEEP END, buddy.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 6:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I suppose next we’ll hear a tale from you about Colt McCoy being taken off his mother’s teat a month too soon, which explains why he is sometimes uncomfortable in the pocket because he hears the echoes of his cries from when he was a baby or some shit… arghhh – yeesh!

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 8:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Graphic and disturbing. Well done.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 30, 2011 8:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Frowns, I agree that he was lying about trying to throw it out of bounds but is that really something to get that worked up about? Religious hypocrisy is not something I care about. All people are hypocrites, religious or otherwise. I love animals but eat and wear meat. I’m not going to hang the kid for saying he was trying to throw it out of bounds when he was really just trying to make a play and threw it 10 yards short. Also if Tony Pashos doesn’t shove the D End into Colt’s midsection, maybe he makes the throw. If you watch the film I could make the argument Colt’s trying to protect Pashos’ stupid move.

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 10:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey man just a heads up, you can actually directly reply to any comment that you’d like. Just click the little “+reply” sign on their comment and go from there.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:14 PM EST up reply actions  

So you don’t like Colt because of his religion? He wrote about it in a book; he’s not talking about it constantly like Tebow.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

See above. It’s not the religion, it’s the hypocrisy.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

he is a pretty good writer, but is dogmatic about his opinions, starts vendettas with those that don’t agree with him, and ignores basic logic.

Basically, he writes like a political pundit.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 28, 2011 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly. Everyone overis on the “trade-away-the-next-2-drafts-for-Luck” campaign cus they hate Colt’s personality (/family?). I’ll admit some of Colts passes were a little high or a little behind, but expecting your QB to put it in the perfect spot in that weather is completely unfair. Colt threw catchable passes that were not caught. That’s all there is to it.

"It is unlikely that anyone has ever read Nietzsche or Derrida and has been inspired to open a soup kitchen"

by troy145 on Nov 29, 2011 2:38 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t get the personality thing. That’s not even relevant but Frowns attacks it. my favorite part about him? I commented saying he was a bit off (he had a freeze frame from a bad angle to show that Colt pass to little was awful) and a couple other things, and my comments got deleted or just didn’t show up

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 4:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Your comment was deleted because it contained a link to your facebook page that was laced with personal insults. I have no obligation to leave that shit up at my site. Thanks for reading.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

criticism=/=personal attacks.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

“Frowns is a terrible writer … Rush Limbaugh”

Even if you want to call that “criticism” instead of a “personal attack,” I also have no obligation to provide a forum for what I see as unfair thoughtless criticism either.

I take on plenty of criticism at my site, including at the post you were at.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I take on plenty of criticism at my site

And from what I saw browsing multiple posts, you respond by condescension and belittling the person. Both are obnoxious and completely disrespectful…and tbh, no “real writer” will take you seriously if you do that in the comments (by real writer, someone who is paid and has a career writing).

The Rush Limbaugh part is only a “personal attack” to if you make it one. It was an analogy that if you bothered to read the comment on my status I made (within a minute of the status), that it was a criticism of your writing being too dogmatic and you belittling the people in comments.

These are things I witnessed and are not “thoughtless” unless you think I am a thoughtless person and in that case, I guess there’s nothing I can do.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 5:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Shucks believe it or not I quite like my career as a lawyer, and actually get paid by the best newspaper in Cleveland to write columns, too.

I’m sorry again that you’re sad that I’m not inclined to let you use my site to take unsupported shots at me but there’s only so much I can do to help you there.

Thanks again for reading.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Ahh, it all makes sense now.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 30, 2011 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

that you’re sad that I’m not inclined to let you use my site to take unsupported shots at me

lets forget whether or not the “shots” or “criticisms” are supported or not. I did not mean to take take shots at you on your website. I linked it to facebook because I was too lazy to sign up and it was an error in judgement to forget they were link and to think you would have an issue.

and actually get paid by the best newspaper in Cleveland to write columns, too.

tbh, the PD is a disappointment for a newspaper in the size of a media market that Cleveland is and there are few columnists there that truly have the skill to be nationally syndicated or write for a bigger market (but that’s a different topic).

Thanks again for reading.

you don’t care whether or not people like or dislike you as a reader, just that they read so you can increase your incredible pageview numbers.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 5:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d never call the PD the best paper in Cleveland. I write for Scene.

There are some great reporters and columnist at the PD and they still do some great work, the editors have run that paper off the cliff vis a vis what it should be. It’s really sad.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d never call the PD the best paper in Cleveland. I write for Scene.

The sad part is, the PD is probably the best paper in Cleveland…and it is not run particularly well.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

If that’s true at all, the only reason would be that it has an enormous budget.

Give Scene 1/10th their budget and they would kill.

Also, appreciate it re: the facebook thing above. I should have said that. And I really would rather have enthusiastic commenters such as yourself read my site than not, believe it or not, provided they don’t take things (including comment moderation) so personally. Stop by again some time.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Give Scene 1/10th their budget and they would kill.

possibly. For me sometimes, the Scene is great and at other times, the Scene is something I pick up at a coffee shop and look at once. It depends on the issue, but it definitely has its moments.

(but that’s the thing with smaller publications, they often are more hit or miss)

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 5:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow, you really are a baby. You put yourself out there and censor criticism. What a joke.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 30, 2011 3:23 PM EST up reply actions  

By the way, there are plenty of people, like me, who would trade away two draft picks for Luck in a heart beat. That does not mean we are illogical Colt haters; it’s just that Luck, in my mind, is a once-in-a-lifetime prospect. If Colt turns out to be valuable, even better. We can trade him for picks and have insurance if Luck somehow doesn’t work out. This is a debate for another day though — just pointing out that you don’t have to be a lunatic, like Frowns, to support trading for Luck (far from it).

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s possible also to not be a Colt hater and also think he is not the guy that can lead us to a Super Bowl. I like him on the team, I just don’t see him taking us to a Super Bowl victory.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I am in this boat right now. The potential is there, but not the progress that would lead you to believe in the guy. He’s made some good plays, he’s made a handful of great plays, but I want to see him take steps forward instead of forward then backward then forward again.

I admire his toughness, I just don’t know that he is “the guy.” And if you don’t know you have “the guy” you have to get “the guy.”

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with this. I want him to be the guy; he has 5 games left to show that :/.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

He probably has even more. If we draft a QB, we probably wouldn’t play him right away. Holmgren didn’t want to play Colt in year 1, and he seems to lean more toward the Carson Palmer approach than the Peyton Manning one.

If we draft Barkley and sit him, that’s Colt’s chance to turn into Drew Brees in more ways than one.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah that’s true. I could still see Holmgren going after Flynn. I just don’t want a QB in the 1st; I hope Colt does well enough to make us take a WR instead. We need WRs so badly. I feel like Barkley would look like crap with these current guys too.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

He probably would, unless Little could start hanging on to footballs. We could still get a WR and Barkley in the first, and then draft targets for him later on too.

…If he decides to enter the draft.

I think if we want a QB that we’re sure is better than Colt we’ll have to get him in the first round.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

i still think barkley goes back. and he’ll win the heisman, sc will challenge for the national title, and barkley will be the #1 pick in 2013.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep. Agree totally. He’ll keep throwing to his ridiculous WRs who can’t leave this year anyway.

And if he’s like Bush or Mayo he can get paid, too ;)

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Lee and Woods are insane.

by Brownie's Year on Dec 1, 2011 12:51 AM EST up reply actions  

ESPN is reporting that he has filed paperwork to get evaluated by the NFL.

Doesn’t mean he will leave, but I’m sure he will be told he is a first rounder.

by Bernie19Kosar on Dec 1, 2011 5:53 PM EST up reply actions  

it’s just that Luck, in my mind, is a once-in-a-lifetime prospect.

If not once-in-a-lifetime, at least once or twice in a generation type of guy.

I just don’t want to trade the house for the guy if that’s what it takes.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

he is a pretty good writer, but is dogmatic about his opinions, starts vendettas with those that don’t agree with him, and ignores basic logic.

In short, he’s a moron.

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Nov 29, 2011 2:44 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Unfortunately, it’s true. I think when Mangini reads that site, he thinks the guys is freaking nuts.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

true, I have met lawyers with more sense than him though.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Is it me or does champions64 and johnnypronto sound a lot like this Frowns guy?

"The rush of battle is a potent and almost lethal addiction, for war is a drug."

by dirtyjoe on Nov 29, 2011 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

The problem is that Frowns doesn’t actually have a problem with Colts play, he’s more bothered by his comments on his treatment by the Mangini staff so he blasts his play. C64 and Jpronto really just think Colt sucks as a QB, and maybe he does, but they’re just over the top with it. I don’t think either has any problem with Colt’s press stories.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:16 PM EST up reply actions  

They think McCoy sucks?

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s the rumor going around.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 10:50 PM EST up reply actions  

that blog
I don’t think he is being fair at all.

Its a blog. many bloggers are unfair, especially this one.

After reading his recent article (linking to an article he wrote in the cleveland scene, ripping mccoy for having a book), the guy just is an immature blogger who creates vendettas with those who don’t agree with his opinions.

So now that Colt made it seemed like mangini sucks, he has a whole long, awful post just ragging on him.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 28, 2011 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think Colt is your problem at all. He needs protection and dependable WRs

Get Blackmon and replacement for Steinbach (who I think will retire) and see how much better Colt plays.

"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"

by JUNGLEJOHN on Nov 29, 2011 11:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Steinbach is injured right now, and has been great for us. The one who needs replacing is Lauvao.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

And Pashos.

We could not block the Bengals. At all. It was horrible.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

and to compensate he lined up too far back for an illegal formation.

by SBP on Nov 29, 2011 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m still not sure that was a good call, but he was definitely cheating back as much as he could.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the announcers nailed it in their speculation that they had probably warned him not to do it and then he did it so they had to call it.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 30, 2011 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Sounds plausible. Still, you are allowed to cheat back until your helmet is in line with a vague point on the center’s body. It’s a little ticky-tack to call that IMO unless the OT is really cheating, and I don’t think it was that bad.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Back injuries are really bad news for OL guys. I liked Steiny when he was here

and he is a tough guy, but I am not sure he comes back from this. I hope he does. He is a good player and a good guy.

You have a great LT and C and your Oline was condidered one to the best. I would agree that Pashos and Lauvao need to step it up. It is hard to retool the OL corps and the WR corps in the same draft.

"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"

by JUNGLEJOHN on Nov 29, 2011 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

We were considered one of the best because we had Steinbach in there. Him going on IR was a huge blow to our OL. Hopefully he’s good to go in 9 months.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 29, 2011 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Regardless, he’s not getting any younger and we’ll need someone soon. I hope we get him for at least one more year. As you say, it’s easier when you don’t have to fill 5 needs in one draft.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Steinbach is overrated. Pinkston is improving and playing well recently. RG and RT are the issues.

by -bobby- on Nov 29, 2011 10:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Steiny is underrated if anything

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 10:50 PM EST up reply actions  

False. Everyone is acting like he is the difference between having a sweet OL and a sucky one. Thats not the case. If you look at metric stats of OL (the only way you can really “rank” OL) Steinbach has been one of our worst OL the past 3 years. This is when turnstile was at RT. I would not be surprised if hes not brought back next year making 7 mil (or more, i think that was the year avg from his contract) to play a position where we have a younger guy doing pretty darn good in there recently.

by -bobby- on Nov 30, 2011 6:40 AM EST up reply actions  

interestingly, the run blocking is ranked 22 this year and was 17 last year. pass blocking is ranked 15 this year and was 23 last year. seems like pashos + lauvao + pinkston have picked up the pass pro, while st. clair (vomit) + steiny + pork chop were superior run blockers.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

numbers according to football outsiders

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Do they have individual rankings? I know PFF has said Pinkston has been good in pass blocking this year and bad in run blocking. If I remember correct, Steinbach is opposite. But taking the whole OL is not the whole story. I would say RG is where we significantly went down from last year (compared to Porkchop who was underrated in Mangini’s system). Did you see him get just knocked out of the way en route to Geno Atkins getting a sack in about 2 seconds last game (I think it was 2nd qtr)? Maybe Eric switches to RG and hopefully a rookie RT who can start right away.

by -bobby- on Nov 30, 2011 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

bross actually navigates their site way better than i do … if they have individual lineman rankings i haven’t been able to find them.

what i find most interesting is that football outsiders, which measures every snap of every game of every week, shows us that the pass protection hasn’t been nearly as bad as many here would like to believe. getting a “real OL” seems to have been accomplished already, at least as far as pass pro goes.

and, for the record, according to football outsiders there are some pretty enlightening pass pro rankings out there: GB – 20; CHI – 22; PIT – 23; SF- 29.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Three of those four teams have QBs who get the ball out quick, and the other guy is the size of a lineman. We need someone who fits into one of those categories.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Colt has been getting it out much more quickly lately. He didn’t have a chance against Cincy, there were DL on him before the last step in his drop.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I can’t navigate PFF’s site all that well honestly. They have a large focus on fantasy and sometimes its hard to find individual lineman rankings outside of a single game where they mention it.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

About time someone else here says that our o-line is better than “absolute garbage”.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Dec 1, 2011 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

They are definitely better when Pashos is healthy. I believe even last year when we were beating the Pats and Saints he was playing. Big diff over Artis Hicks

by HenryDawg on Dec 2, 2011 9:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Which also sucks that he’s so fragile otherwise we wouldn’t need a RT.

by HenryDawg on Dec 2, 2011 9:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Wasn’t he on IR last year?

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Dec 2, 2011 6:41 PM EST up reply actions  

on this subject, I did see that Pashos over the whole season has a 7.0 positive rating by PFF, which is quite good. 11 pressures in 298 snaps is solid to say the least.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Dec 1, 2011 9:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Steinbach is one of the best guards in the league on pulls. He is a solid pass blocker, better than Pinkston. The big reason for that discrepancy I believe is St. Clair. he was just awful.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

i think you’re right. st. clair was so bad in pass pro … the improvement this year must be mostly pashos.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that’s the big difference.

Also, another thought on the FO rankings. While they try to isolate the OL play from the RB in run blocking, it is often hard to do. The Browns are 3rd worst in RB yards and while Adjusted Line Yards does to some isolation between RB play and OL play, its certainly not 100%.

The Browns were #1 in the league in stuffed rank: i.e. their ability to keep the RB from being tackled behind the LOS. The biggest issue is that our RBs suck worse in the open field, and we don’t have Hillis for short yardage situations (20th this year in short yardage situations compared to 4th last year).

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

“sabermetrics” is really, really hard in football.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 2:37 PM EST up reply actions  

in short, yeah.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

No doubt.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:20 PM EST up reply actions  

While I can see these numbers making some sense, I am not sure they reflect the amount of times Lauvao or Pinkston were supposed to block someone and they blocked someone else (but did a good job).

That number is “astronomical”, by my unofficial count. Neither makes good reads in zone blocking either in the running or passing game.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

oh, by no means am i trying to imply that either of the guards is “good”, or anything but “pretty awful”. i just found those rankings interesting.

what i will say is that i’ve seen pinkston standing around, blocking no one, looking up at the sky while colt gets smashed a hell of a lot less in the last 4 weeks than i did in the first 4. so there’s that.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s a start. Still, I can’t believe Mack doesn’t just scream his assignment at him every play.

So many times they’ve been in 1/2 slide or however we conceptualize 6 man protections and he blocks Mack’s guy as someone runs through the B gap untouched.

You know the “hat on a hat” comments from Shurmur? One of those hats is a guard not finding the correct “hat” to block more often than not. The rest of the time it’s usually a RT’s physical limitations.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:37 AM EST up reply actions  

That is the world we live in: Instant gratification. NFL is no different. There is no patience, especially at the QB position. The Colt bashing is over the top. Sure we would all love Brady, Brees or Eli. However this is our QB and he is busting his ass. I personally think he will lead this team into the playoffs in the future.

by Grockcubs on Nov 28, 2011 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe c64 has been reading a little too much of Cleveland Frowns’ stuff…

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 29, 2011 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

My first thought.

"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"

by Gradysmanldy on Nov 29, 2011 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Just to provide some perspective on how biased Cleveland Frowns is…

From Cleveland Frowns’ latest post this morning:

Who could it be that Cribbs "really needs to stop talking" about here? If it’s not the coaches we can really only think of one guy, but who knows. Anyway, it’s at least good to see that we’re not the only ones frustrated that a Browns franchise that fired its last coach because he "didn’t win enough" is now playing at least twice as poorly as last year’s Browns did, against a slate of opponents that’s at least twice as weak as that faced last season, yet with a roster that’s significantly better.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but there seem to be a lot of exaggerations and some things that are just factually incorrect. For example, the last sentence. I believe Mangini was dismissed because he didn’t run the team the Holmgren envisioned. I also have to argue that we’re definitely not playing twice as poorly as last season (I would say we’ve improved), nor is our schedule, though admittedly weak, twice as weak as last season’s. Finally, our defense is significantly better, but I would argue that there is still a lot of room for improvement on the offensive side of the ball in some key places.

(Also notice the snide little jab at McCoy again?)

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 29, 2011 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

This guy seems to prefer being right and having us not to well rather than being wrong and having us be a good team.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly. It’s not that he’s writing about how bad we are, but that he seems to genuinely enjoy doing so.

Don’t get me wrong, he has some pretty well done analysis pieces. I’m definitely not a fan of his opinion pieces, though.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 29, 2011 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Remember this is a guy who blamed Marcus Benard’s motorcycle accident on Eric Mangini’s firing. He obviously is going to read Cribbs’ remarks as about Mangini as well. Everythign is about Mangini in Frowns’ world. You would think Mangini is the reincarnation of Vince Lombardi and Holmgren is just some schmuck who coached two teams for a few years and never made the playoffs.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 1:19 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

You have to be making that up about Benard.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

You didn’t know that; it was discussed here at length. Here’s a link. And the highlights:

And while we don’t and probably won’t ever know why he got into the accident, if we’re talking at all about increased risk taking as a result of depression, even if at the smallest margins, who could possibly blame Benard for being depressed?

Of course, decent and right-thinking Browns fans are all depressed enough about the roughshod that the Holmgren fiefdom has run over principles of honesty, integrity, accountability, and the one that a decent man who’s making obvious progress at an historically difficult job gets to keep that job. But for us fans this is all just a diversion. Imagine what it must be like for someone like Benard whose livelihood depends on it. To go undrafted out of Jackson State to the best story in Browns training camp just one year later, to become the team’s best pass rusher and lead its injury-crippled defensive unit in sacks the next season, and for a boss who supported you every step of the way through the harrowing ordeal of the premature birth of your son, a boss who made you the man you were, a better man. To go through all that only to see that boss summarily dismissed — against all notions of honesty, integrity, accountability and the one that a decent man who’s making obvious progress at an historically difficult job gets to keep that job — and to become a forgotten man in the regressive low-ceiling schemes* of that boss’s successor despite having made every effort to fit in. And all of that before ever having a chance to sign a contract for much more than the league minimum, which, had basic principles of honesty, integrity, accountability and the one that a decent man who’s making obvious progress at an historically difficult job gets to keep that job been honored, would have been something you’d have certainly had every chance to have done. Now, who knows?

. . .

Here’s wishing Benard a speedy recovery, and that an organization with more respect for basic principles of honesty, integrity, accountability, etc., gives him a chance to get back on track.

Some people here argued that he might be joking, but it’s pretty clear he’s not. As I said above, the guy has lost his f-cking mind.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 4:06 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

This was over the top and when he initially posted, I thought it was a joke. Based on his posts since then, I would say he probably actually believes it, and it’s unfortunate.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

A tongue-in-cheek effort to get folks to think about depression and metaphysics. This board could use a little more nuanced thinking.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Like I said, tongue-in-cheek was how I initially perceived it, but it’s tough to tell sometimes.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s tough for me too, I have to admit.

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:43 PM EST up reply actions  

you want to foster a consideration of metaphysics through your pro football blog?

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Hindsight BS.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 30, 2011 1:57 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Do you think about suicide a lot?

by Brownie's Year on Nov 30, 2011 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

“There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide.”

by Cleveland Frowns on Nov 30, 2011 5:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, but I choose not to be depressed. And if that’s how you think I should feel because I am a Browns fan, then you’re a f*cking nut case.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 30, 2011 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Whoa. I can’t believe someone is that delusional over a coach (and I mean the writer, not Benard).

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, and this coach in particular. As I noted above, I liked Mangini (more than you I know), but I don’t think he was the second coming of Paul Brown and there was no evidence to support that he was anything other than a good coach at best. He did nothing great with either the Jets or the Browns. I’ll always love his win against the Steelers on Thursday night and the wins against the Saints and Pats. All those games were great coaching jobs. But those games were exceptions to what was an overall mediocre and sometimes scared and gimmicky coaching style on both sides of the ball.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think anyone should get too riled up about anything this guy says. He obviously writes for shock value… that equals readers, opinions and press.

"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur

by LocalMan on Nov 29, 2011 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think that’s right. I read him for years — and he was not writing for shock then, at least if he was trying, he was not doing a good job. He had really interesting and intelligent analysis and opinions about Cleveland sports that you did not read anywhere else (except Cleveland Reboot which is sadly no more). The firing of Mangini however has really driven him nuts. And I cannot believe what I read sometimes there.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 8:47 PM EST up reply actions  

If you read some of his older stuff its really interesting.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 9:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think anyone should get too riled up… He obviously writes for shock value…

Rush Limbaugh talks right wing ideology on the radio all day for shock value. Talking heads on MSNBC political shows reel off hour long liberal ideological rants for shock value. Colin Cowherd gleefully blows 2 hours of sports and social commentary out his ass every day for shock value and laughs but also because he has a forum and is very opinionated. That doesn’t mean these people have zero significance or relevance to the world at large and public consciousness. If things are being said on public forums or the public airwaves, via privately owned enterprises or otherwise, anyone and everyone should feel free and fully empowered to express their disagreement and/or disapproval of any and all of the above self-aggrandizing blowhards, “Cleveland Frowns” included.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 29, 2011 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re right on

That doesn’t mean these people have zero significance or relevance

I have a feeling this guy is more relevant now because of his current style… not his past “interesting” articles. Sometimes an ‘over the top’ style will become the reason for a media persons significance, rather than the substance of his work.

I would say that MK and Grossi are significant media members in Cleveland. Not because they are outstanding writers, but because their work gets peoples blood boiling and accrues tons of interest.

"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur

by LocalMan on Nov 29, 2011 11:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ll be honest, I had never heard of him until I started seeing the hilarious one-sidedness pro Mangini. Maybe it’s working for him.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I hadn’t heard of him until I noticed a link on the WFNY site a few months ago and started reading some of his stuff on occasion.

Everything I read from him was either a slam on Toni Grossi, a slam on Holmgren for firing Mangini, or some general gloom and doom sky is falling rant, at the same time reveling in the latest failures of the Cleveland Browns (real failures and/or failures he concocted with idiotic logic and twisted evidence, etc.). I also notice he has somewhat of a growing following of ditto head bloggers. Makes my stomach turn, but I still read him occasionally. Kind of like watching a train wreck – fascinating yet disturbing at the same time.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 8:13 AM EST up reply actions  

I think I’ve stated elsewhere that I tend to agree with his points, just can’t agree with his rationale always.

I enjoy Grossi slams quite a bit.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 8:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Gross slams are fine. But if its all you have to say, long winded article after long winded article, it gets old and tiresome (I just skip over them any more).

I mean please, find something else to talk about for a change. At least he does alternate his “Grossi slam”, “fire Homgren, not Mangini”, and “The Browns suck ass” articles, so at least he isn’t completely redundant.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 9:13 AM EST up reply actions  

He calls his blog “Frowns”. That gives me all I need to know.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Check out some of his older stuff on Cleveland sports history, curses, etc. They are pretty good reads

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

FYI – I just posted a fanshot pointing to a new article on Frowns’ site. I had forgotten about these “Xs and Os” article series he publishes (from a guy he has working with him). They are very good IMO.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

They are rufio quality. I love them, but someone else writes them. In any case his pre Mangini firing writing is excellent.

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Love the new profile pic Em.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 29, 2011 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Correct me if I’m wrong, but there seem to be a lot of exaggerations and some things that are just factually incorrect. For example, the last sentence. I believe Mangini was dismissed because he didn’t run the team the Holmgren envisioned.

Holmgren himself said that Mangini was fired because he didn’t win enough games.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 29, 2011 12:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I stand corrected. And also that brings up the question of how long Shurmur has if his record does not show improvement over Mangini’s in a reasonable amount of time.

Overall though, I think my other points are generally accurate.

(Thanks for the fact-checking.)

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 29, 2011 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

No problemo ;). Most of it is opinion. Our schedule is most definitely is most definitely softer. It’s hard to say that it’s “twice as weak” though, considering that we still play two of the best teams from the more talented conference twice a year each. Where last year we had the Jets, the Pats, and the Saints, this year we just had the 9ers, so there is a bit of credence to it though. As far as improving as a team, that’s also opinion. IMO, we took one step forward and two steps back. Our talent definitely improved but we hit the reset button on the coaching staff and decided to take our first flight on offense without a co-pilot/navigator. The defense definitely improved (color me surprised, Dick freaking Jauron) There is also big area for improvement on the offense. Some areas are (very) weak, but we have some pieces in place. I think the success we’ve had on the ground with the (5th) RB we were using for what felt like the whole season points to what I’ve been saying most of the season, that the Oline gets too much discredit around here. Our line is starting to Gel again, the RBs are good when they can stay healthy, FB is a question mark(?) (though not a very important one) QB is still kind of a (?), and our receivers are, well, we’ll just leave it at our WR are… A couple good drafts and an OC and we could possibly be that borderline playoff team that some around here (laughably) thought we had this year.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 29, 2011 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Frowns has some good points, but his need to exaggerate (why would he say “twice” as difficult when his point was perfectly fine without that word?) turns off a lot of people.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m actually starting to think all the talk about this year’s schedule being way easier than last year’s is overblown. We played 9 games against playoff teams last year, and we are on pace to play the same number this year.

by bbstirrd on Nov 29, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I think that was based on the assumption that the Raiders and the 49ers would roll over and die as they have tended to do over the past few years. Not a lot of people predicted both of those teams would be playoff-caliber squads this year.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 29, 2011 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe so, but each of our victories this year have been against bottom third teams. The only competitive loss against a quality team was against Cincy in both occasions, and I would argue they aren’t in the top 10 in the league.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh I agree we haven’t beaten any good teams yet this year. Still time to change that though, and I’m still holding out hope…

by bbstirrd on Nov 29, 2011 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

If we can win just 1 of the 4 against Ravens/Steelers, I will change my tune quite a bit.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Win two of those games (One against the Ravens and one against the Steelers) would really turn heads. A win though in the last two weeks against the Ravens or Steelers may not be the same test. The Steelers could have claimed a Wildcard spot by week 17 and not be able to improve their position in the playoffs win or lose so they may rest alot of people. Same goes with the Ravens in week 16. If they have closed out home field throughout the playoffs or if they are in and only a wild card , again resting players to get healthy might be what they do and a win there is not necessarily a big win for the Browns.

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

The Steelers have had playoffs wrapped up and still played their starters in the past.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

could be. We wil see then is all I am saying

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea, they still manage to wreck us when it doesn’t matter for them.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

We’ll always have Paris 2009.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

This is true, but it should be placed in the same context as Mangini’s wins and losses: Mangini was in year two.

Year one was the 1-11 start with the sole 6-3 victory over Buffalo until going on a 4 game streak to end the year—and pittsburgh’s season. The only close losses in the 1-11 start were Cincy in OT and Quinn’s aberration against Detroit.

I’m not saying we’ll see that kind of winning streak, but Mangini had a much worse start than Shurmur.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Thank you for pointing this out.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Than the fact that when Mangini got here he also had to gut and retool the roster should also be taken into consideration too. Shurmur didn’t inherit camp powderpuff and lead it to a miraculous 4 game win streak that no one saw coming.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 29, 2011 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

He absolutely had to tear down, but Shurmur had to do a little of this himself. He has 5 new starters on offense, 5 new starters on defense. New schemes on both sides of the ball, and a limited offseason.

I’m not trying to take away from Mangini’s winning streak at all: it was, frankly, miraculous. And it bought him another year as a HC in the NFL.

But the 1-11 start before that was as hard to watch as any Romeo-coached team, and should have had a government warning for eye-bleeding.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

that 1-11 team was one of the worst teams in recent football history. no question.

the 4-0 team that ended that year was one of the biggest “wtf” moments in recent football history.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

And Mangini should get credit for both.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, agreed. We should also base our evaluation of him on where he started and what direction he was heading. I realize that is up for dispute, but those that were sad to see him go thought the team was improving.

by Roger Dorn on Dec 1, 2011 10:50 AM EST up reply actions  

It definitely was, but that team had nowhere to go but up.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Decent comparison, but like Flea mentions we need to realize that Shurmur is inheriting a year of Heckert’s drafting.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

see above

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it’s fairly obvious to anyone that Mangini came into a worse situation that Shurmur.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

No regular poster here would deny that for a second.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 30, 2011 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

probably not top 10, but in that 10-14 range. Fringe playoff team.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought he had some good points too. The fact that he brings up Mangini whenever he criticizes Colt discredits his arguments for me. It’s clear that even if he had a 150 pt rating he will never like the kid.

Also that he thinks Dalton’s pass to Green was perfect is questionable. It was great given that he was about to get pounded and given that he was throwing to Green. If that was any of our receivers that ball gets picked by Adams.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Don’t know that I agree there. The fact is that Colt does not have a 150 rating, and I think Frowns has decided in his mind (as have I, but not to his extent) that Colt is not the guy. He takes things a bit too far at times, but I don’t think he is irrationally biased against Colt.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d say any time you criticize a guy (Colt) for writing a book in the midst of an analysis of his play, you led yourself to irrational bias. That has nothing to do with the situation and is just attacking the man.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

No, he seems to be irrationally biased. He was mocking him for his post-game presser too. Unnecessary.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve been reading Frowns for awhile, and I have no problem with his comments on Colt’s presser. He was posing a fair question.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Was it necessary for him to transcribe his response and then mock him for stuttering/flubbing the answer?

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I think his point was that McCoy was lying and by pointing out the stuttering, he was showing that he believed that was a sign Colt was lying.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I don’t think he was mocking him so much as just pointing it out as evidence.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 29, 2011 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Hm yeah. You’re right.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed on the Dalton pass, he threw it up there as a prayer, knowing Green has been making plays for him.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

We also played the Texans, when they were stacked and Tennessee who is not terrible.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Texans are a quality team and we got smoked, so I don’t really see how that works in our favor. Tennessee is probably a bottom half team and we also got smoked, so I don’t know how that works in our favor again. Maybe overall strength of schedule is slightly better than it appears, but as for what those games say about this year’s team, I would say it’s a negative reflection.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I was just talking about SOS, not how we fared against them. Our schedule looked much easier in the pre-season. It’s still been relatively easy, probably not twice as easy though.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

The twice as easy comment is bizarre and unquantifiable.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Tennessee i’d say is probably better than bottom half, probably slightly lower than Cincy and we played them when they were playing well (granted, we also didn’t play well).

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t really check power rankings, but I am curious where the majority have Tennessee. I’d put them in the bottom half of the league personally.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

i watch a decent amount of tennessee, and they’re bottom half in my book.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

fwiw, Football Outsiders has them at 15th or 16th in their power rankings. Tennessee has been really inconsistent but had stretches where they were a borderline top 10 team.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:28 PM EST up reply actions  

He’s exaggerating, sure, but I don’t think his main point in those sentences is wrong. The team is playing worse with better players, and our last coach was fired because he didn’t win enough games.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s what I am saying when I say that I agree with his main points just not to the extents he goes to make them.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

This is where I am as well.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I appreciate Mangini’s discipline and attention to detail as being better than what we’ve thus far seen in Shurmur, and it’s definitely manifested itself most glaringly in our special teams play this year – mishandled snaps, worse blocking on kick returns, etc. But for all his positive attributes, Mangini philosophically was not on the same page as the current FO relative to scheme and drafting for that scheme. If he were, he’d probably still be here, although I can’t say I miss Daboll.

I saw the hiring of Holmgren/Heckert as the necessary cornerstone in establishing the philosophical consistency we’ve lacked for the past decade or more. So, while it was a necessary evil, aligning the coaching staff with that front office was a greater organizational necessity than Mangini was a good coach. And he was a good coach.

Having said the above, Mangini should have been let go as soon as Holmgren got here so that we’d be two years into a coaching staff and new schemes instead of one.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 29, 2011 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Having said the above, Mangini should have been let go as soon as Holmgren got here so that we’d be two years into a coaching staff and new schemes instead of one.

i liked mangini a lot … and i couldn’t agree more with this.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 6:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Same. I don’t disagree with the act of firing him, I disagree with the timing and stated reasons.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:14 PM EST up reply actions  

ST coach this year needs to be fired.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Atrocious. The problem is that they also cleaned house of some of our best special teams blockers and tacklers.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not saying I disagree with their philosophy or even really know what they are thinking, but that’s a huge reason for our dropoff. Losing guys like Costanzo has really hurt us.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

absolutely. and while you can’t stockpile too many costanzos and ventrones, those are the types of guys, especially on teams with a long way to go, that keep you in games.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Ideally those ST guys are young, talented players who have a chance to learn and refine their skills and then break out on regular teams.

I think they got ahead of themselves in their organizational plan.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:42 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah, i think a little arrogance slipped into the building once shurmur got in house and the organization was officially “aligned”. no OC, a clear lack of focus on ST, not even a slight attempt to address the WR position … it all reeks of a bit of, “we know better than everyone else”. and that’s ok, as long as they learn from it.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 1, 2011 12:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Little’s a stab at addressing WR. As painful as it it sometimes, I like that the FO is sticking to building through the draft and signing our young guys. I can’t speak to any arrogance (there may have been) on the part of the coaching staff, but I definitely agree that personnel mistakes were made.

by chitown browns fan on Dec 1, 2011 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

i have no problem at all with using the draft as the foundation of building the organization, but you’re leaving value on the table if you don’t participate meaningfully in free agency, as well. especially at a position like receiver, where it takes real time to adjust to the pro game for everyone not named aj green, it’s hard to pin your hopes to a 2nd round project as the primary improvement for a whole offseason.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 1, 2011 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Though it has resulted in a misstep here, I love that attitude. It’s why I love Rob Ryan. “We’re going to blitz from anywhere and everywhere, and we are going to hit your QB. Go ahead and try to beat us, because we’re going to hit you in the mouth.”

It’s the same as “We’re going to draft better and put together a more talented roster than you are. You can try, but we’re going to grab the players you want and find ones that you don’t know about that are going to develop into stars.”

For a team this bad, I think you need some confidence. They let it slip into cockiness this year, but I’d rather have it that way than the other.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

as i say, i think it’s fine to be a little arrogant and cocky, you just have to leave room to improve upon your arrogant and cocky ways. for example, we’re hiring an OC next year to continue to run the same offense and let shurmur call the plays … still cocky, but a good move.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 1, 2011 5:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I was sad when he left. The new coaching staff didn’t realize what they had in guys like him on ST and Vickers for blocking purposes in the offense.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I think they realized what they had in Vickers and it didn’t fit what they wanted to do on offense. If we want a 250lb guy who is going to go around stabbing Mike LBs in the heart, they are available every year.

I think they also realized what they had in Costanzo, but didn’t think he was worth a roster spot. I think most people sitting here in week 12 would say differently.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree. Tabor is on borrowed time.

by SBP on Nov 30, 2011 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

rightfully so. pretty amazing that something as “simple” as special teams can be impacted so significantly by coaching. how can seely’s kick return be SO superior to tabor’s? i mean, it clearly is, but i find that to be weird.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s kind of sad how highly touted he came in and how badly he’s underperformed. Devin Hester has made that man’s career what it is. Kind of gives my an all new respect for what Hester can actually do.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Dec 1, 2011 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

these are tough points to disagree with.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I was thinking that as I was reading Cleveland Frowns stuff.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

specifically the 3rd down pass at the end of the game going behind Little while he had a defender draped on him. Thoughts?

like BOAB said, it’s been discussed. it was pass interference and even with it, Little still should have made the play (a guy like Green would have) but 0% of that is on Colt. Frowns just needs to shut up now. This is turning to a vendetta.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 28, 2011 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

This is incorrect.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 12:57 AM EST up reply actions  

As rufio has written, so it was.

"It is unlikely that anyone has ever read Nietzsche or Derrida and has been inspired to open a soup kitchen"

by troy145 on Nov 29, 2011 2:40 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

If Little delivers against our hated rivals, he can quickly grab a taste of redemption. If he doesn’t, then the Browns may have an additional semi-question mark at the receiver position in 2012.

Little’s drops bugged the crap out of me, but I don’t think he’s looking at getting the boot right away. There were a lot of posts on this site mentioning how WRs need two and sometimes three years in the NFL to reach their potential. Little will likely need at least that much time. His overall experience at the position is pretty limited. It was a bit of a gamble drafting him, and it’s going to take more than this season to know if the gambled will pay off.

BTW, the fact that he is still so rough and yet leading rookie WRs in receptions lends credence to DCMJ’s assessment of our WR corps.

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
I have the best wife - ever.

by JustBob on Nov 28, 2011 11:26 PM EST reply actions  

Great points. I also think making him the X receiver puts a lot of pressure on him and for the most part he’s responded well.

Lets be real here. We lost because of another bad snap, not because of Little’s drops.

by HenryDawg on Nov 28, 2011 11:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Well I don’t know about that, I agree when with that old platitude about teams losing games. Little dropped some passes that should’ve been first downs, there were some other bad drops as well, Colt threw a bad interception (whether he was trying to throw it out or not), our defense could not stop Jermaine Gresham, and then Pointbrand made a bad snap.

I think you could point to any of these as reasons why we lost, but I think the reality is we are a struggling team in another rebuilding year because we are trying to implement another new offense under another new head coach.

by BiggieBrown on Nov 28, 2011 11:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Couldn’t have said it better myself.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 29, 2011 9:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Lets be real here. We lost because of another bad snap, not because of Little’s drops.

No, we lost for a lot of reasons. Bad snap is only a minor reason — there is no way that field goal is a gimme even with a good snap. 50/50 at best.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah it bothers me that people are acting like a good snap there results in that FG automatically being made, or results in the defense stopping the Bengals, which we didn’t do anyway.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s not 50/50 when Dawson is 100% on kicks over 50 when the operation is performed correctly.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not saying we win the game if he makes the kick either, but it sure gives us a better chance.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

It would have been his longest field goal of the season (and a yard short of his career long), and it was into the wind — giving that anything more than a 50/50 is a stretch. Unlike others, I think it was absolutely worth trying and a punt there would have been extremely disheartening.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree with all of this.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep.

That play is just the easy one to point to and say “if this play were different, the outcome of the game could have been different as well”

I think that we are starting to lose like this is an indication that we’re headed in the right direction; “first you learn to compete…”

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Well I think its been like that most games this year. We never get completely dominated (again most games) but we find a way to lose on 1 or 2 bonehead mistakes. The positive of this is that we don’t ever seem to make the same mistake twice which Shurmur specifically said was their goal. I see this team continuing to get better the longer they play together.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

we don’t ever seem to make the same mistake twice

you say this a lot, and i just don’t see how that’s true in the slightest.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 5:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, the first time we missed a field goal, it’s because our protection blew. The second time, it was because Alex Mack put his foot in the way. And the third time was just a bad snap! Don’t you see, it’s a fresh new mistake every time!

Dawgs By Nature: Holy Joe Thomas we suck

by Adrock2099 on Nov 29, 2011 5:25 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Shawn Lauvao is exhibit A.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 5:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think expecting a O Lineman to never get a false start or miss a block is what they’re talking about.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

How about expecting him to stop getting personal foul penalties for cleaning up a pile?

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

That happened once in pre-season and once in the regular and like Kosar said, that’s not exactly the worst thing you want to see your young players doing.

I didn’t see the regular game one, but the pre-season one was sort of ticky tack so maybe the coaches didn’t get on him until the regular season one? He hasn’t had one since.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

It happened at least once in the regular season, I swear I remember a second time in the regular season. The fact is, the guy will probably have almost a full field of penalties by the end of the season (well, at least half by know). 2+ Holds, 3-4+ false starts, 1+ personal fouls, this isn’t just just an isolated issue.

If the guy was a pro bowler, I could maybe live with it, but he may be leading the team in false starts AND pressures given up on the QB (though Pinkston and Pashos may be ahead of him here, i don’t have the stats on it).

I almost prefer Pinkston because he commits less penalties, even though I think Lauvao may be better blocker,

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I could see them moving Pinkston over when Steiny gets back (according to Dieken, he will probably be back). Believe me, I haven’t been impressed with Luvao at all.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I am not saying you have been impressed. I am just getting tired of the stupid penalties. Lauvao’s problem I believe is mental.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 9:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I can’t wait until we replace Luavo.

I would play Greco over him right now.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 10:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m talking about the bone head stuff, not something like holding.

We got quicksnapped – hasn’t happened since
We gave up a kick return TD to Oak – hasn’t happened since
Blocked kicks – hasn’t happened since
Bad snaps – freak accident, hasn’t happened again, bad snap, well they got rid of Pontbriand

It doesn’t mean they’ll never make the same mistake twice but for the most part they seem to see a problem and fix it.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:32 PM EST up reply actions  

So instead of the same horrible inexcusable mistake, we are running the gamut of inexcusable mistakes!

This seems like grasping at straws. The coaching has been poor this year.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 6:27 PM EST up reply actions  

i’m happy to look at positives (the defense has been pretty good, this week was our best game, the rookies seem to be playing pretty well, etc.), but i agree with you here. the coaching has not been good. period. they have a ton of work to do this offseason, as do the players.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 6:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Well you have a team that’s learning on the fly. There are a lot of rookies and second years in a new system, blah blah blah.

They’re getting better, they fix mistakes. Last year how many games did we lose late because of bad tackling, missed assignments and terrible, I mean 10xs worse than anything Colt has ever thrown interceptions?

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 6:43 PM EST up reply actions  

The interceptions were the result of a horrible, INT prone QB, I agree with that. This year’s team doesn’t have that QB. We are talking about coaching though, not the talent on the field. The same applies for tackling, that’s a talent issue.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Tackling is both talent and coaching. You can teach someone to tackle and teach a slower player about angles and technique. Actually doing it is a different story, being right there and not tackling is just a player who has given up and that’s coaching related as well.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

The game I am thinking of came down to Gocong missing a tackle when he was in the correct location, he just blew the play. I am referring to the MJD huge run.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Literally all 11 players had a chance to tackle him and failed.

There was also the Holmes TD in OT- -3 guys around him, no tackle

There was another play in the Carolina game where Barton physically moved in a direction away from the ball carrier (and not to reset the angle)

These are just a few I remember. All were late in the game when these guys were clearly not fresh and feeling beat up.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 11:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea, the Jets game was laziness, not a gap responsibility issue. Eric Wright watched Holmes break free and Ward, let up because he thought Wright had him. I still don’t see how these missed tackles are coaching issues.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:29 PM EST up reply actions  

though it has improved the last couple games.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s a stat in which we definitely lead the NFL: number of different ways to lose a game over a 10 year period.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 30, 2011 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Things like getting quicksnapped aren’t excusable ever. It’s one thing to say “Player A missed their gap on this play and they haven’t done that since.” That’s fine, that’s the kind of mistake rookies make. Getting quicksnapped is the kind of mistake an eighth grade flag football team makes.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Well it happened, they fixed it, move on.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

My point is that saying they fixed that mistake is meaningless. A well coached team wouldn’t have made that mistake in the first place.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Well I’m not sure Luvao’s our best player either.

I have no problem with guys playing all the way to the whistle even if they occasionally go a little past it. If that was Lamar Woodley they would never throw a flag

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

well they got rid of Pontbriand

Wow, didn’t know that. Kinda harsh, but understandable given the position.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

i’m no shurmur fan, and i agree that you have to kick the FG there.

rufio may be onto something … maybe we’re figuring out how not to suck out loud.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the 4 games remaining against the Ravens and Steelers may rain on that parade.

Dawgs By Nature: Where we're only 6 wins away from the post-season.

by Adrock2099 on Nov 29, 2011 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

good point. that will be an important test.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, but to take one from the Steelers. It’s sad that our expectations have dropped so low that playing remotely competitively against our own division is considered a win.

Dawgs By Nature: Where we're only 6 wins away from the post-season.

by Adrock2099 on Nov 29, 2011 4:34 PM EST up reply actions  

we did lose 261,435 – 6 (thank goodness for dawson) to the steelers in the season finale last year. baby steps…

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

It was a Mangini cliché but it’s applicable here. You have to learn how to keep games close against “better” opponents first, then you start to win a few of those games as you become a better team. Then, once you’ve become a damn good football team you are used to those situations, you win the key plays that make those little differences, and you win those games more often than not.

With learning new systems and philosophies on both sides of the ball, we’ve hit the reset button.

Under Mangini we had gone from a pathetic 1-11 team that couldn’t win it’s way out of a paper bag to one that was challenging each week in 2010, and began to “learn how to win” against teams like the Saints and Pats. Now, we’re back to learning how to stay in games and this one is prime example.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

The flags on the goal post didnt seem to be whipping around at all. so “against the wind” is very dramatic to say. I doubt the wind had much to factor in.

by -bobby- on Nov 29, 2011 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Dawson said he was making them from 60 yards in that direction pregame. It would have been a hell of a kick, but I don’t think wind factored much either.

by bbstirrd on Nov 29, 2011 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he needs to improve and its a serious problem, but none of this comes as a surprise. The guy was recruited as a RB and switched to WR full time between his sophmore and junior seasons (and then sat out his senior season)

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 12:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Drops are a legitimate problem for Little, but they aren’t going to magically go away and they certainly aren’t going to magically go away this year.

Little is worth developing, but it also wouldn’t be a bad idea to get another WR. Cribbs is having his best season at WR and it hasn’t amounted to much, Massaquoi is about to be concussed out of the NFL, and Norwood is better suited to be the #3 at best. Unfortunately, we aren’t fixing this until April at the earliest.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 1:01 AM EST reply actions  

I’m cool with that. I never expected Little to be a great WR… I expect him to be a great compliment to the great WR that we will eventually acquire.

"It is unlikely that anyone has ever read Nietzsche or Derrida and has been inspired to open a soup kitchen"

by troy145 on Nov 29, 2011 2:42 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

This.

Player X, Little, Norwood, MoMass. I like that group (you know if player X is like Megatron or AJ or Fitz etc)

by -bobby- on Nov 29, 2011 8:42 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t have any grand expectations with Little, but after the first few games I was starting to get psyched about him. But the drops are really unfortunate. He HAS to get MUCH better at catching the ball or he isn’t going to be a legitimate #1 WR. I hope he can overcome this, but I think we’ve got to find a legitimate threat at WR asap (either through the draft, trade, FA, whatever).

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 29, 2011 9:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Unfotrunately the one WR we have who is always open is also the one always dropping the ball. Sounds about right for us.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 10:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Until we draft Blackmon and win SO MANY SUPER BOWLS.

Dawgs By Nature: Where we're only 6 wins away from the post-season.

by Adrock2099 on Nov 29, 2011 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha I’m in.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Little is going to be good. Very good.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

We’ll see, I don’t see him as a number 1 though right now.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Me either. But a “true” #1 is going to cost us a first rounder more likely than not.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s worse it, if the guy is elite.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I think so too, but Blackmon is probably the only guy I’d take a chance on right now this year. Then again, I haven’t watched that much CFB this year.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:43 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t read that comment proper, but VJax could be had for money only.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 30, 2011 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Probably had to do with my typo, and Jackson has a load of talent.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 7:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I was thinking about this earlier, but I don’t think he would come to Cleveland.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 1, 2011 1:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Every man has his price.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Dec 1, 2011 9:08 AM EST up reply actions  

And someone will give him just as much money to play in a different city.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 1, 2011 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

We can always offer more. Build us an escape clause like we did in Donte Stallworth’s contract.

by Bernie19Kosar on Dec 1, 2011 6:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Correct me if I’m wrong, but Jackson will be an unrestricted FA in 2012.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Dec 1, 2011 9:10 AM EST up reply actions  

And AJ Smith will just franchise him again (he was an unrestricted FA in 2011). He just wants to spit VJ and not give him a long-term contract. Wonder why SD never signs any free agents?

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Dec 1, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Can’t you only franchise a guy once?

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 1, 2011 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Nope. You can do it more than once. I don’t think there is a limit of how many years you do it either.

by Brownie's Year on Dec 1, 2011 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe the second time you do it, the price tag goes up.

I think it goes to average of top 5 paid players regardless of position.

Plus, it is possible that AJ Smith isn’t there after their season, don’t know if that would hurt or help his chances at free agency.

by Bernie19Kosar on Dec 1, 2011 6:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Price tag goes up 20 percent or to the tag value for the next year, whichever is better.

No limit on number of times a guy can be franchised — it’s something the NFLPA wanted but didn’t get.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Dec 1, 2011 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

The joke is that VJax wants to stay in SD I think — why wouldn’t he, he has a good QB with good chemistry and SD is not a bad place to be for a young guy. So if AJ Smith leaves, a new regime may just give him the long-term contract he deserves.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Dec 1, 2011 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the more likely candidate is DeSean Jackson.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 1, 2011 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

After watching his drops the other night and reading some recent write-ups (from the Eagles blog), not too sure about Jackson right now.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Dec 1, 2011 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

(reading some of the comments in that thread BTW – also food for thought…)

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Dec 1, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

jackson needs to go to a strong locker room w/ some real veteran leadership. he’s not a bad guy (like arrests and so forth), just a prima donna. a prima donna w/ a universe of talent, at that.

i don’t know that the browns are that locker room at this point.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 1, 2011 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I am really disappointed in his play this season. I think he is suffering some Hillis-like contract off the field distraction type stuff.

I would rather have VJax even with his off the field issues.

by Bernie19Kosar on Dec 1, 2011 6:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I think DeSean is actually kind of scared after the hit he took last year (I don’t blame him), and when you combine that with the fact that he has no contract, he is not playing well. Obviously, this is not a good time to not be playing well for the guy. Think he is a little brighter than HIllis though — I think some of Hillis’s problems is the guys is just not that smart and has made moves that he didn’t understand would be seen as bad. I still love the guy and hope we resign him though. I think a comparable contract for him would be whatever Cinci pays Cedric Benson.

Re VJax, all things being equal, I think he is a better receiver than DeSean. In fact, I don’t have any doubt about that.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Dec 1, 2011 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Interesting point on the hit he took. That one was vicious.

by Bernie19Kosar on Dec 1, 2011 7:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Little just needs more confidence. Anxiety will kick in sometimes when you see the ball coming your way. You start trying too hard and get nervous. He’s young and can work on zoning out all the bullcrap.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 29, 2011 2:33 AM EST reply actions  

I have the mental image of Greg at work, at a desk, working on “zoning out the bullcrap”

"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"

by Gradysmanldy on Nov 29, 2011 10:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

by pwndabear on Nov 29, 2011 11:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Little just can’t seem to hold onto em.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 29, 2011 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

He needs to be more gentle when handling them.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 29, 2011 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

He just has to focus on one at a time.

by SBP on Nov 29, 2011 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Watching film one day, our coach was talking about a particular DB who tipped a lot of passes, and said “[player] gets his hands on a lot of balls.” The room erupted in laughter.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it is a good thing he got the TD reception. Hopefully he can take that memory and use it to boost his own confidence and block the nagging negative thoughts.

I liked reading this from Little (from a Plain Dealer interview):

… It’s definitely something I can learn and grow from. Obviously I was definitely upset at my performance, but I just took the time to cool off and come back and get better.…”

He clung to the football after his first career TD — a 3-yarder at the end of the half — and cradled it into the locker room. “Then I took it home and put it on my nightstand and watched it all night,” he said.
Reminds me of having a rough day on the golf course, except a couple of really good shots. When I think about the round later, I think about those two shots. I can work on the bad shots later.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 29, 2011 9:33 AM EST reply actions  

I’m a believer in Little. I’ve seen him do some good things this year and I think that is pretty good for a rookie receiver. I certainly see way more potential in Little than I ever did in Massaquoi or Robiskie. I can’t blame this loss solely on Little. This team seems to do everything well and badly. A great pass or run from McCoy is followed by an interception, a pass is batted down by the defense then Dalton is allowed to throw to a wide-open receiver 35 yards down field, Dalton is sacked then Benson runs through a gaping hole for a 30 yard gain, Dawson kicks a 50+ yard field goal then has to deal with another flubbed snap.
The Browns right now are a study in inconsistency. Though one can review a close game like this one and point to this or that as a reason the team lost, for the Browns you can see pretty bad failures in all aspects of the game that are game deciders.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Nov 29, 2011 11:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Cleveland Browns: Consistently inconsistent.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 29, 2011 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

The thing I like about this is that it actually shows potential. Games like this one are a prime example of a young team learning a new system etc, etc. People were pulling out that excuse earlier in the year when the team looked downright awful, but these last two games are what that kind of team looks like.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Learning to compete.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry but you just couldn’t see it early in the year. Some of us could.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

That some people saw it doesn’t mean it was there.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

But its more likely that the seeds were there and others didn’t see it.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Also didn’t mean to come off dickish but you’re basically calling us a bunch of silly Pollyannas

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I just think the team that played in some of those earlier games looked like a D3 college team. They were doing absolutely everything wrong. Things that people who have been playing football their entire lives should not do wrong, ever. I saw no flashes of good plays some weeks, or they were isolated.

This week and last week they were able to put drives together. Not consistently, but they did it. That is something every NFL team should be able to do, regardless of circumstances. Now the errors they’re making are errors that young/inexperienced teams make, not errors that nine year-olds make.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

There’s no way they start 2-1 if there weren’t positives, I don’t care how bad the competition was, they’re still NFL teams.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:33 PM EST up reply actions  

For me the drive against Miami was the last real major positive on offense. I said major positive, I did not say only positive

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 5:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn’t disagree with that. there wasn’t a major positive until this recent stretch of the last few games.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

The Colts are going to go down as a tie for the worst team in NFL history. I don’t think we should be too proud of going 2-1 to start.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 6:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Nobody’s talking about pride, we’re talking about having the seeds to build a good team in the future. Winning 2 of 3 games (close to winning all 3) is much better than a lot of other teams who have more veterans and have been in the same system longer.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I am not talking about pride, I am talking about 2-1 being a complete aberration, which it will be clear is the case when we finish the year something like 3-10.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Just because we don’t beat the Steelers and Ravens to close the season does not mean progress hasn’t been made.

The point is that we’ve been pretty close to bottom of the barrel for a long time. In a short period of time we’ve moved out of the bottom and can play with an average to decent team like Cincinnati.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Just because we don’t beat the Steelers and Ravens to close the season does not mean progress hasn’t been made.

I do agree with this, strongly.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Clearly, a competitive game would go a long way to making us feel better, but the fact of the matter is Cincy is the only competitive game we have played against what could be considered a good team.

I am willing to change my tune if we play those teams tough.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Anyone who uses losses down the stretch of a lost season against the Steelers and Ravens to declare that the team has made no progress is an idiot.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 8:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Either way, if we end up 5-11, it sucks.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 8:50 AM EST up reply actions  

This is something I believe we can all agree on.
(and I don’t believe anyone has said they’d be “happy” with a 5-11 record…).

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 9:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Here is the progress that has been made from last year:

Offense:

Points per game 16.9 (2010) 15.0 (2011)
Yards per game 291 (2010) 295 (2011)
Pass per game 189 (2010) 199 (2011)
Rush per game 103 (2010) 96 (2011)
Penatlies & yards 78 (675) 66 (547) we still have 5 games left.

Not any real progress at all

by champion64 on Nov 30, 2011 9:57 AM EST up reply actions  

remember we had 3 quarterbacks last year

by champion64 on Nov 30, 2011 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Rush yards is a skewed stat since both Hillis and Hardesty have been out for multiple games this year.

Not that anything I say, regardless of validity or hard evidence to back it up, will change your mind about anything, so I won’t bother trying.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

That is a good point, it really only matters if we are getting better by the end of the year.

by champion64 on Nov 30, 2011 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

So if we go 5-11 this year and lose the first 8 games next year but end up 4-12, it’s ok because we improved throughout the year? I have trouble seeing the logic here. If we’re not improving year-to-year as well as throughout each year, it doesn’t really make much of a difference.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 11:01 AM EST up reply actions  

My point is that I’m accepting the fact that we blew everything up and started from scratch this year with a new coaching staff and new offensive and defensive systems across the board, as well as a number of personnel changes. It happened. I’ve accepted it. I’m over it and wish the best for Eric Mangini.

So, speaking for myself, I am less interested in last year vs. this year, and more interested in whether this new team is going to succeed and become competitive.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 11:10 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Ok, makes sense. I was just trying to get a grasp on what you meant by that.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

sorry, didn’t read further down before i posted my other comment.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 30, 2011 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree the progress this year is only fair comparison from September to December. Next year assumming the same basic roster then year to year comparisons are made. We do have to be compared to the rest of the NFL and if we are competitive offensively, and right now that is a no. We will know a lot more in 5 weeks against some top teams (except Arizona)

by champion64 on Nov 30, 2011 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

So now you’ve got us 4-12 next year? Talk about needless hand-wringing and speculation.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 30, 2011 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Think it was a hypothetical.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, that was a hypothetical situation. I apologize for any lack of clarity there.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

D3 college team is a huge exaggeration. There were only 2 games before this stretch where I saw pretty much no promise (Houston and Tennessee)

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Miami, Indy, St. Louis, Oakland, off the top of my head. Specifically in these games the offense, the defense has been better than I expected all year.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

The offense was pretty good in Miami and Indy and really not bad in Oakland either, whatever you want to say about it being fake, we didn’t kick an onside kick because we were blown out of the game. We still had a shot to win. St. Louis was weird because we looked great between the 20s and sucked in the RZ, all still signs of improvement.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Re Oakland, the only reason we were still only two scores away was because Hue Jackson made an inexcusuable coaching mistake by going for it on 4th down in easy FG range and could have put his team up by 3 scores. That was a stupid, stupid mistake that, had it cost them the game, would have been talked about to no end.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 8:58 PM EST up reply actions  

This is true, but still, we must have moved the ball enough to make up for 2 bad ST TDs

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

We scored 17 points against Miami. Seven of those were on a last minute drive Colt pulled out of his ass.

We did not look great between the 20s against St. Louis, we looked competent at times.

I don’t care if we had a shot to win. You’ll notice we did win two of the games I mentioned. That doesn’t mean we weren’t horrible.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 11:08 PM EST up reply actions  

If we are in a position to win a game, any damn game, we are doing well at this point.

No offense, but this is a loser’s mentality. We are doing well to win any game? So if we beat the dregs of the NFL, none of us should complain because well any win is doing well at this point?

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:22 PM EST up reply actions  

In the first year of a rebuild? What did Mangini’s first year look like? We couldn’t buy a TD for extended periods of time. Despite blowing sunshine out my ass in the preseason and before every game I’m still trying to think practically.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 11:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Can’t wait for the day we’re good and we can stop debating about Eric Mangini.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 11:28 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

That’s nice, but I wasn’t debating Mangini right there.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I know you weren’t. Just responding to HD’s mention of Mangini and various comments.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

What does Mangini have to do with this team looking like crap against any somewhat decent opponent? If you want to get excited about wins over the winless Colts, the Dolphins, the Jags, and Seahawks (the latter 3 in miserable performances be the offense) then we just have a different take.

This isn’t the first year of a rebuild, unless you buy into the Holmgren mulligan year.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

What does Mangini have to do with this team looking like crap against any somewhat decent opponent?

According to some people here (not singling you out), this current team wouldn’t look like crap with Mangini at the helm.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 11:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m just tired of some people here crapping on this team when if you went back 2 years ago and anyone complained about the 1-11 start you were directed to cleveland.com.

There’s also a lot of double standard on the meaning of wins and losses. Mangini’s inability to improve his previous record still showed signs of improvement while our wins this year mean nothing and the close games we have played equate to loser mentality.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 11:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I remember people freaking out over 1-11. People freaked that Mangini traded Winslow and Braylon. People thought it was a good idea for Dawg Pound Mike to meet with Lerner.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh yes, the constant controversy about water bottles and bus rides and missing GMs. It was a nightmare. Can you really not tell me they look better set for success now?

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 11:47 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s not the comparison we’re making though. We should be better set for success now than we were a year ago, and we are not.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 12:57 AM EST up reply actions  

We absolutely are. We have an organization that’s all on the same page and can finally evaluate talent.

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 12:59 AM EST up reply actions  

We had an organization that could evaluate talent last year. It’s great that Shurmur runs the WCO and all, but at this moment in time he is not a very good coach. He may become one, sure, but he is not one now.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 1:04 AM EST up reply actions  

We had an organization that could evaluate talent last year

Ugh…

Can’t wait for the day we’re good and we can stop debating about Eric Mangini.
(courtesy of Emily and echoed by yours truly).

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 8:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Great, you don’t want to talk about it. See yourself out of the debate.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 8:51 AM EST up reply actions  

We had an organization that could evaluate talent last year

Are you saying Tom Heckert and Mike Holmgren couldn’t evaluate talent last year and can this year?

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 10:02 AM EST up reply actions  

No, I’m not saying anything. I’m taking Dorn’s advice and bowing out of the debate of this year’s coaching vs. last year’s coaching and this year’s team vs. last year’s team. I’m not interested in that debate.

Right now I’m just interested in how this year’s team progresses from September through the end of the season.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 10:12 AM EST up reply actions  

No, they could but they can evaluate talent better to use in the system they want to run than they could for a Daboll/Ryan/Mangini team

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

which is why 2010 was a bullshit, wasted year. holmgren should return his salary for that year.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree, it was a total joke that set the franchise back a year.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Dec 1, 2011 6:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Shurmur has a ways to go but I like his methodology a lot. I also like that he’s not overly rigid and willing to adapt and understands that he needs to improve as well. I would take him today over probably a dozen or so other coaches who are currently active.

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

shurmur has a ton to improve upon.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

If you want to get excited about wins over the winless Colts, the Dolphins, the Jags, and Seahawks…

I don’t recall him saying anywhere that he was “excited” about anything.

I’m still trying to think practically
This is what he said. He (among others) is looking at the season as it progresses, looking for signs of progress, and pointing them out when he sees them. That’s what I’d call practical. And rational.

The only ones who’ve been getting “excited” as far as I can see are champion64, JohnnyPronto and a few others who keep increasing the volume with their mantra about the sky falling and talking about trading away our entire draft for some knight in shining armor who will come in and save us all from Armageddon.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 8:28 AM EST up reply actions  

“Behold the rider of the pale horse, for he is Andrew Luck, and hell follows him.”

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Nov 30, 2011 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

If we are in a position to win a game, any damn game, we are doing well at this point.

No we aren’t. That Miami game was awful. The Seattle game was embarrassing.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 11:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Why do you guys act we should look like the Green Bay Packers half a year into a rebuild?

I’m happy with any win and I’ll accept competitiveness at this point. The fact that they play to the buzzer is in of itself a huge improvement over the last two years when the senior citizens on our team could barely make it through 4 quarters.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 11:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Another strawman, we aren’t asking for the Packers. Just competitive football.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:33 PM EST up reply actions  

And we have been competitive in most of the games, that’s my whole point, which you keep saying isn’t good enough.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 11:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually, I think the disagreement is that I do not think we have been competitive.

I will give you competitiveness against teams which I find to be among the worst in the league, but I would disagree completely otherwise.

That said, Cincy is a decent enough team and we played them well twice (although the first game was mainly with Gradkowski.) I hold out hope that it continues.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

You can’t knock the Bengal game because of Gradkowski, our defensive line knocked Dalton out of the game. They caused that.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 30, 2011 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I granted it was a competitive game against a non-terrible team. We should have won to be honest.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Another strawman, we aren’t asking for the Packers

Very ironic. After the dozens of posts I’ve seen talking about how great this team would be if we only had a guy like Aaron Rodgers… talk about a strawman :-/

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 8:34 AM EST up reply actions  

If you could link to where I said that, I’d be open to retracting all of my statements.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 8:52 AM EST up reply actions  

I’ll save you the trouble. I expressed a desire to fix the QB position and used Rodgers as an example of making his teammates better, not saying we had to get Aaron Rodgers, just fix the position. I still want that.

Link

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 8:58 AM EST up reply actions  

And I wasn’t just talking about you BTW.
To quote you:

we aren’t asking for the Packers…
And Rodgers is just one of a number of QBs who’ve been on the “yearning for” list in the posts I’m referring to.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 9:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I’ll speak for myself here, but I want a top 10 quality QB, and I want the Browns to keep trying until they get one.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 9:48 AM EST up reply actions  

In the interest of being 100% honest, I want Aaron Rodgers.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 30, 2011 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Me too. Hell, who doesn’t? :-/

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s my belief that I would also settle for Tom Brady, as long as he promises to battle. I believe that he will battle and is a battler.

Dawgs By Nature: Holy Joe Thomas we suck

by Adrock2099 on Nov 30, 2011 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

That is my understanding as well.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Obviously.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Dec 1, 2011 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t recall anyone saying we would be great with Aron Rodgers. I recall saying I think we would be a playoff team, but we would be nowhere near as good as the packers are right now.

We aren’t asking for the Packers. We’re asking for competitive football.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

We all want to see competitive football.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 10:13 AM EST up reply actions  

And the only way to get it is to have a franchise QB.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 10:19 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t disagree. I’ve never said otherwise.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

We dont seem to have that franchise quarterback is what notthatnoise is saying. So what do you think you would do?

by champion64 on Nov 30, 2011 10:38 AM EST up reply actions  

I think we have a potential franchise QB in McCoy. But, as I’ve said in many comments over the past few months, he needs to keep improving through the end of the year (and into next year). At the end of the year, the FO will assess where he is and go from there (i.e. how we approach the draft). This makes sense to me.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 10:52 AM EST up reply actions  

This.

I’m really hoping Colt can show us something more these next five games and that our receivers don’t make it even tougher for him to do so. That said, I’m really on the edge about whether I would take Blackmon or Barkley if the opportunity presented itself. I still want to know how Colt would look with a #1 WR and a new RT.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

i still maintain that you can see “it” even if you have bad receivers. or at least signs of “it”. mccoy doesn’t show those.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes. The drops are killers. Also, we have lauded Dalton and Stafford for their play, and rightly so. They’ve done good jobs. The issue I’m having is that when I watch AJ Green and Calvin Johnson jump up and snatch a ball out of mid-air for a TD or a critical first down on what we (or most observers) would consider a questionable throw into coverage, it’s difficult for me to compare Colt to those QBs and feel I made a fair comparison. I’m sure most folks here remember that sick grab CJ made in the end zone a couple of weeks back in triple coverage. That’s a heck of an outlet for a young QB to have.

My view on Greg Little is that he’s an Anquan, not a Fitz. Having an Anquan is nice, but a complimentary Fitz makes them both better. For my money at this point in the Colt evaluation process, getting a Fitz and linemen makes the evaluation process next year more legitimate. If Colt’s and this offense’s development is still sputtering after the addition of those pieces in this upcoming draft, I’ll jump on the “let’s draft a QB” wagon. Until then, Colt’s my guy.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

so, it’s only ok to evaluate colt when he has an all-universe receiver (a Fitz) and a top-10 offensive line (football outsiders ranks our OL as 15th in pass pro)? just want to make sure i’m reading you right, b/c you might look good at qb with a Fitz and a top-10 qb.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

No, he’s saying you can’t compare him to Stafford or Dalton, because their receiving corps makes them look way better than they’d look with ours.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

We all evaluate him every week, and I certainly recognize when the guy has a bad game or makes a bad decision. I never said to stop the evaluation process or to not be critical until we have a Fitz.

However, when watching those other guys, it’s impossible to recognize that a receiver who can stretch the field and make circus catches certainly benefits the QB.

And if I were to look good playing QB with a good o-line and an all-world receiver, certainly Dalton and Stafford have done so and should continue to do so. I have no reason at this juncture to believe that Colt would not also benefit from such a situation.

Do you believe otherwise?

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

“. . . impossible NOT to recognize” is what I meant above.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

of course those would help, but my point is that those don’t grow on trees. how easy is it to get a fitz or a megatron? i’ll spare you the suspense: not easy.

if we have to wait to see if colt is the real deal until we have a hall of fame wide receiver and a top-10 offensive line, well, he’ll likely have a very long and mediocre career here.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d settle for a good offensive line, honestly, and point taken regarding all world receivers. They certainly aren’t a guarantee their first year in the league, but I do think it would help the team regardless of whether Colt is the guy of the future. Personnel included, there are just too many variables in flux right now for me to feel like Colt shouldn’t be given next year as well to mesh with the current stable of WRs (and any new ones) and continue to climb the learning curve of the WCO.

You mentioned “it” above. I remember him having “it” last year, and while it’s not a tangible entity, I still believe he has that unquantifiable attribute about him, as fragile as these things are in sports.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

You know what also doesn’t grow on trees: leadership ability. Just ask Kyle Orton.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

“it” is as ethereal as it gets, there’s no doubt about that. i didn’t see “it” much last year, and i’ve seen virtual zero of it this year.

ultimately, what is happening with the browns’ qb situation is my worst nightmare: colt has been bad enough for there to be many questions about him, but good enough (in limited bursts) for lots to think “maybe if we put more around him…”

there’s no doubt in my mind colt would improve w/ better support, but i’m a firm believe that he wouldn’t improve enough. as well, you can see in the qb’s that truly have “it” that they can be great even w/ shitty surrounding characters.

my hope is that, at the very least, we bring in some competition for colt next year. i’d prefer a high draft pick, but even if it’s a FA, we can’t just give this guy the keys b/c he hasn’t earned them.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, agreed. Ultimately, his weaknesses are enough to have me believe he doesn’t have what it takes to be a top 10 QB. I see a small, weak-armed QB that isn’t near accurate enough to overcome these negatives.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I have no issue with a competitive situation at QB, but I’d much rather see our high draft picks complete the defense and shore up the offensive line.

Out of curiosity, would you guys trade for Alex Smith in SF?

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Not to compete with Colt, but instead of Colt (to clarify).

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

trading for smith is a hard question, b/c it brings up what you’d have to ship out.

would i rather have alex smith as the quarterback of the browns than colt mccoy? absolutely.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

They are about the same to me.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess the reason I wouldn’t though, is that I don’t think we should be looking to acquire QBs that aren’t going to win us a Super Bowl.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

fair enough. as a hypothetical “who would you rather have”, i go smith. do i want smith leading this team to the promised land? not at all.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Alex Smith actually sound unintelligent if you listen to him speak.

by champion64 on Nov 30, 2011 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Not a chance I would go after Alex Smith.

I don’t want to use a pick on a QB just for the sake of using a pick on a QB, but if there are guys that our talent evaluators deem to have the potential to be great QBs, I want the pick used on them more than anything else.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn’t trade anything for Alex Smith. The guy is a bum.

He will never win a Super Bowl as a QB. The question the Browns need to answer is if McCoy is in the same boat.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 30, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed. However, Smith seems to be doing infinitely better now than any of his prior seasons because of a new coach who believes in him. He has no shiny new weapons; his weapons have been substantial for years. My contention is that, along with the learning curve, if Colt and our young team begin to believe that they can succeed, they will. And if they don’t believe in the system, themselves, and the direction of the organization, they won’t. “It” is a fragile commodity in life; look at Tiger.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I know that draft position isn’t the end all be all of player evaluation, but the 49ers have 8 first round draft picks on their offense (including Smith).

Add in their best player (Gore) and that offense seems to have weapons all the sudden.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 30, 2011 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Smith is actually a great example for what I would expect for Colt with the proper supporting cast. We may win some games in the regular season, he may not completely suck like he did in the past, but at the end of the day, that team is not winning thte Super Bowl

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 3:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I had higher hopes for Colt coming into this season, but right now I would agree with you.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 30, 2011 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Smith has some great pieces around him and a guy in Harbaugh who has gotten great results out of pretty much every QB he has ever coached.

Spergon Wynn could look like a passable NFL QB with that line, Frank Gore, and 3 weapons to throw to drafted in the 1st round.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Flag for calling Braylon a weapon.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Dec 1, 2011 6:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Sometimes you have to pull stuff out of your ass. It still counts on the scoreboard.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I saw promise on offense in two of those games.

Plus, we aren’t talking about just on offense, that is changing the parameters. Either way, D3 is a huge hyperbole.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 8:27 PM EST up reply actions  

D3 is a huge hyperbole.

You don’t say?

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Mount Union would destroy this Browns team. Don’t knock on D3.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 30, 2011 12:22 AM EST up reply actions  

to say it early in the year was pure, blind, uncut homerism. there are actually some real (small) signs now.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 5:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Absolutely not, I am not a homer or a pollyanna. I saw things I liked about this team from the start. The fact that half of them were rookies is part of the reason I could look past the mistakes. The fact that there were fixable mistakes is also part of the positives as opposed to say, watching 3 or 4 “veterans” stand around with their thumbs up their butts instead of tackling someone.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Taking turns messing up.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

“End of team meeting, guys. Gather around. Who will screw it up this week? Time to draw straws!”

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

i dont get it

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

by pwndabear on Nov 29, 2011 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Just joking that the team meets each week to decide who’s going to be the goat for that game.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

there’s less than one goat?

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

by pwndabear on Nov 29, 2011 5:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Its gotten so bad the “goat” is actually the only player who didn’t mess up.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Where is the post on our new long snapper?

by Les Fleurs Du Mal on Nov 29, 2011 11:26 AM EST reply actions  

What pisses me off is that the media decides to focus blame on a player likely because they were annoyed he didn’t speak to him after the game. The bias is ridiculous, these guys act like the players owe them something.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:36 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

It’s true. The media are basically 12 year-olds with grown-up jobs when it comes to something they see as an “insult,” though one could argue that that’s true even when they’re not offended by some minute discourtesy.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 29, 2011 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Our two first round draft picks. IF they do not try and trade up to get someone they want, do the Browns trade down and acquire more picks while still adding to the team and fill holes, OL, LB, DB, WR, RB?

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 12:31 PM EST reply actions  

You have to use those picks. We need more first round talent.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Unless we magically get a chance to draft Luck or Blackmon I wouldn’t be against trading down. More picks is always a good thing.

Dawgs By Nature: Where we're only 6 wins away from the post-season.

by Adrock2099 on Nov 29, 2011 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with this. Get as many top 50 picks as you can.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

i’m generally on this team, but i think it’s time for us to add some high-end, top-of-round-1 talent.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Not that top-10 picks are any kind of guarantee, given the frequency of first round busts. I would tend to trust H&H to weed those kinds of players out more than previous management, though.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 29, 2011 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I loved that they didn’t take the bait on Jones. He will be a solid receiver but I’m not sure top 6.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Julio Jones has been pretty much amazing.

Go over to falcoholic and see if they have any regrets. Some analysts early projections have Julio being better than Green

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 29, 2011 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Go over and get the unbiased opinion of the fans of the team he plays for and you will see.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 6:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I prefer the unbiased opinion of someone whose not a fan/hasn’t watched the team.

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 29, 2011 6:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I have watched. He’s not going to be as great as everyone believes.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 10:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I will explain further. Jones never sees double coverage. Defenses try to take away White and slow down Turner, allowing Gonzo and Jones (when healthy) to take advantage.

Jones has shown iffy hands at times and struggles to get open downfield (for example see his PI followed by a huge 50 yard drop this weekend).

Douglas has been a better WR than Jones when he has filled in. I have watched the Falcons and have some friends that have plenty of information on this. Jones isn’t the game breaking WR some people believe.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve watched both him and Green. Jones may end up being very good, but A.J. Green is in a different league.

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 8:49 AM EST up reply actions  

He’s going to be pretty damn good. I’ll still take the picks.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

how much falcons football do you watch?

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Considering the Falcons offense is far more advanced than ours at this point Jones has 30 for 498, Little has 47 for 495. Considering everything else we got I think we got the right end of the stick so far.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 6:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Jones has missed 3 games and was injured in at least 2. It wouldn’t be hyperbolic to say he would have twice as many yards as little if he stayed healthy, considering he was averaging almost twice as many as little before this sunday.

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 29, 2011 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Are injuries really an excuse? If he’s injured and not on the field helping his team then he’s worthless for those games.

by RyanBr on Nov 29, 2011 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not going to say Little is better than Jones. At this point he isn’t but he has been about as productive and we also have very promising DT and DE plus an extra #1 pick next year.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t feel like little has done anything that any other WR couldn’t have done if he was being used the same way. His toughness after the catch is great to watch, but doesn’t make up for the fact that he’s not a threat past the 5 yard mark.

In regards to if he was worth it, well you gotta ask thefalcoholic if they’d prefer an average DT and a WR with a 20% drop rate over someone who’s drawing double coverage when he’s when he’s not catching 70 yard passes. Julio has improved the Falcons, I don’t know if Little has or is capable of improving the browns.

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 29, 2011 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Why is Phil already being labeled as “average?” He’s only a rookie.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 7:53 PM EST up reply actions  

i’m not going to get into the SOS research into the falcons b/c i really don’t feel like it, but atlanta was 13-3 last year. they have already lost 4 games this year. julio may yet improve the falcons, i’m not sure he’s done so thus far.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 8:03 PM EST up reply actions  

but atlanta was 13-3 last year. they have already lost 4 games this year.

exactly. The way I understood that whole deal is they were giving up a lot (a 2nd, and a 1st in 2012) for a guy who they thought was the one piece to put them over the top. That’s a move you can afford to do when you are 13-3.

It backfired and while their offense has been worse, the big issue is their D and creating turnovers (went from 7th to 17th)

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 8:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I think if you asked the GM of the Falcons whether the addition of Julio Jones will likely accomplish the goal he had in mind when he made the trade with the Browns (being able to surmount the offensive juggernaut that is the Packers/Saints and win the Super Bowl), he’d lean toward saying, “nope”.

If you asked the GM of the Browns whether the addition of Greg Little plus the draft picks will likely accomplish his goal (building a young winner through the draft), he’d say, “yup”.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 29, 2011 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

ask thefalcoholic if they’d prefer an average DT and a WR with a 20% drop rate over someone who’s drawing double coverage when he’s when he’s not catching 70 yard passes.

A: This is made up.
B: I don’t care what other team’s fans think. Eagle fans boo’ed McNabb.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 29, 2011 10:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know why you would ask them that as it isn’t what we got in return for Jones.

Jones also does not draw double coverage, you pulled that out of your ass.

I would also like to point out that Little has caught at least one bomb this year and has made many receptions past five yards, but I know you’ll just change the subject.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 11:12 PM EST up reply actions  

We’d also have to factor in the number 1 we have this upcoming year from them.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 11:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Should injuries (something also in Jones’ scouting report) not be considered in the evaluation of a player?

I seem to remember you critiquing Browns who couldn’t stay on the field…

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Some analysts early projections have Julio being better than Green

Show me these.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

He did a great job of picking up talent later in the first round and early second rounds and maybe acquire more picks with trading down again? (since we dont have one position of need) What would you like the pick to be, position wise?

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah he is good at that, I just get nervous that we end up being almost good enough because we have a lot of second round talent playing first round talent.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

If the guys available at our pick are high quality, I have no doubt that Heckert will stay put like he did with Haden. We have to view last year’s trade down as sort of a too good to pass up offer. They also may not have been especially high on Julio Jones.

I remember one of the ESPN reporters mentioned prior to the pick at last year’s draft that the Browns were considering trade down options once Green was off the board. I have a feeling we wouldn’t have made the deal if Green were still available.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 1:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with this. We’re at the point where some playmakers could really change our team. Now is the time to be adding that top end talent, but only if you like the player.

I would not be opposed to trading our second first round pick for a first next year that’s likely to be higher.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Right now we have three of the top 42 picks in the draft I think. or somewhere close to that. A lot of leverage to trade. Receiver the biggest need (outside of Luck)? Or still defense?

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

We could really use a receiver but if Blackmon is gone I think we could take Mohamed Sanu with our second 1 or 2nd round pick. I’ve heard Jeffries has hands issues, basically he sounds like a more polished Little which I would probably pass on.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Jefferies is bigger, less athletic, and better at high-pointing the ball than Little.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

For a while I heard people talking about Jefferies being potentially better than Blackmon if he had a better QB throwing to him. Is this true, I don’t watch much college ball. Is he someone we would consider with our pick if we’re in the top 10?

by crazyL80 on Nov 30, 2011 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think he’s in Blackmon’s league, and the comparison one reporter made to Calvin Johnson…I just really don’t see it.

I wouldn’t take Alshon in the top 10, but that’s me. I see about 8 players who are clear top 10 talents if they declare right now, and then a pretty solid dropoff. ‘Shon isn’t one of those 8 for me.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t like the drop off after Blackmon. I don’t think it’s out of the question that he falls to us though. I think right now QB is our biggest need, followed by WR, followed by either offensive line or linebacker, but that doesn’t mean that’s the order I want to draft them in.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

i’m with you on all of the above.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I think right now we’re in the 8-10 position. You think Blackmon falls that far?

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we end up higher than that. I am not optimistic about the rest of our schedule.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

True, a lot could change in 5 games.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I would say FS, but there aren’t many studs out there. The great thing is I don’t think we have huge needs. RT? G? We could use a lot of new players, but we don’t have Terry Cousin out there.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

This comment may be a little mooncamping-esque (miss that guy) but I think Haden would make a great free safety for some reason. More valuable at cornerback right now but it’s just a thought.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 29, 2011 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

No hands doe.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 29, 2011 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve thought so too, wouldn’t that be something if we were so deep we could move him to safety? Maybe in a decade or so.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Small to be a safety

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Free safety? It’s not like the guy is scared to tackle. He’s the best tackling CB we’ve had in years.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes I know. Just think he is a little on the small side. He is going to have a problem with A.J. Green his whole career. He cannot out jump him.

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think anyone can cover Green 1 on 1 unless he’s having a bad day. I also think Haden is having a bit of a cold streak, perhaps due to a sore knee?

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

A lot of people are going to have a problem with AJ Green.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

He did shut him down in game 1, but that was game one of A.J. Green’s career too

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

He is 5’11’ 195. he is probably a bit too short, but not all safeties are 6’3’’ and he has great jumping ability for a safety.

He is built enough to be a safety and may be a tiny bit short. Ed Reed is also only 5’11’ but has great jumping ability. The height isn’t a huge issue and he might be a couple pounds too light, but he is strong for his size and likes to tackle.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Haden jumps pretty well, and his arms are crazy long for a 5’11" guy. Haden’s strength is attacking the ball. I think he could play FS, but I would leave him at corner.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t know what Haden’s arm length was.

I would leave him at corner, but he is the type of player who could play both.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he could, but to me a #1 Cb is more valuable on the other team’s best WR than playing MoF safety. In the NFL at least.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:45 AM EST up reply actions  

i don’t think it’s even close.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 1, 2011 12:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Ed Reed makes me wonder sometimes.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

See also Ronnie Lott.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Dec 1, 2011 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

exactly why I would leave him at corner, no question. #1 CB is so much more valuable.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Dec 1, 2011 2:03 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree and from what we’ve seen so far, Green is light years ahead of Jones.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Green and Dalton look good. Green much better than Dalton, but Dalton is holding his own.

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Dalton has played really well, He looks big in the pocket and has shown good feet and vision down the field. I’m pretty jealous of them.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Dalton has played well, not really well. You have a tendency to over value players by a large margin.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 29, 2011 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

He has been a good rookie QB. I agree his play has been average at best compared to the rest of the NFL starters.

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

The personal insult here was unnecessary.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

there was a personal insult there?

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

by pwndabear on Nov 29, 2011 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

There was a personal insult?

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 29, 2011 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

stop copying me

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

by pwndabear on Nov 29, 2011 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

You have a tendency to over value players by a large margin.

Attack ideas not posters.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

im sorry but i have to

QQ

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

by pwndabear on Nov 29, 2011 5:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I seriously think if this was anyone besides SB, no one would have made this a serious issue.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:38 PM EST up reply actions  

If it were a serious issue I would have sent him a warning and hidden the comment. I’m not trying to jump down his throat or anything, but someone on here told me once that we do a good job of self-policing. I would have said this even if I weren’t a mod.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I would have said this even if I weren’t a mod.

I wouldn’t think you would, I have just seen comments that are just as tame/severe go on as if nothing happened. There are probably at least 1-2 on this level a week and I doubt every single one gets flagged.

If this wasn’t someone who already had issues on here and if the poster wasn’t already an established member of the community, this wouldn’t have been an issue. If the target was someone less established (Johnnypronto, champion64, or any other newer poster), I believe this would have gone unnoticed.

I don’t mind the self-policing, this is my two cents that from an outside observer, it feels you are maybe considering past actions too much (though they inherently have to be in a mod’s mind).

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 8:34 PM EST up reply actions  

HenryDog hasn’t been here appreciably longer than champion64 (a few months longer, but we’re talking almost two years for both). I am also going to start cracking down on the personal insults toward those other guys, because even though I get tired of reading the same old complaints they’re free to make them.

The past does matter. I don’t want to get into it on here because this has already become a bigger issue than it needed to be. If you have a problem with the way I handled this or if you want a longer explanation email me.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 11:17 PM EST up reply actions  

You handled this poorly.

I said it here because it would’ve been a waste of a comment. There was no personal attack; it’s what he does. I didn’t call him a douche in the comment, nor an asshole. I made a curse free observation I’ve made about through his comments and chose to express it directly in a comment where he portrays the issue. You’re pulling at straws.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 30, 2011 12:29 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t call him a douche in the comment, nor an asshole. I made a curse free observation I’ve made about through his comments and chose to express it directly in a comment where he portrays the issue

Yeah, how is that different that pointing out I tend to have long posts?

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 12:46 AM EST up reply actions  

This is true; you do get a bit of flak on here.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 12:52 AM EST up reply actions  

oh, I can take it. I was just pointing out that in reality, that observation is very mild.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 12:53 AM EST up reply actions  

HenryDog hasn’t been here appreciably longer than champion64 (a few months longer, but we’re talking almost two years for both)

oh, we are going by the date’s joined as a measure of who is an active part of DBN and not a lurker? If that’s the case, HD has been here about as long as I have, though I have been an active commenter for at least a year longer (HD, i really don’t care who has been here longer).

If you are talking about being a commenter who is in some way active, HD has definitely been here longer. Its been a good 5-6 months since he started being regular, maybe more. Now I consider him one of the regular’s. C64 is not that in my mind and I bet I am not the only person here who sees HD now as a regular but C64 not as one.

If you have a problem with the way I handled this or if you want a longer explanation email me.

I don’t have a serious problem other than I thought it was a non-issue and kind of a tickytack call imo. I understand calling it here b/c of past history of SB, I just probably wouldn’t.

I see how you tried to nip this on in the butt, but my gut wouldve told me that it wouldn’t have amounted to anything (but my gut has been wrong before, Exhibit A: BQ).

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 12:35 AM EST up reply actions  

I see how you tried to nip this on in the butt,

In the past, you may or may not have nipped things in the butt, however, going forward, you may want to consider nipping in the bud. Less discomfort.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 12:53 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I see how you tried to nip this on in the butt

We can’t have mods making sexual advances towards members!

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 30, 2011 12:53 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

There’s a lot of jokes in this but they are all probably too soon.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 12:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, I’m out then.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I have been here for over a year. and I take a ton of crap, but I realize it is my opinion that brings the crap on me. So if I am man enough to say it , I have to be man enough to take it and I do, from pretty much everyone, with a few exceptions. It is ok atleast we get to talk and hash out our frustrations.

by champion64 on Nov 30, 2011 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I have had run ins, with Burntorangeandbrown, SBP, Emily522, bross, Bernie19kosar, SpecialBrownie, ect ect, but I dont dislike any of them, they have the right to yell back at me. Maybe when we win a superbowl we will all be happy. It is all good. Fun to read all of your comments.

by champion64 on Nov 30, 2011 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

The piling on was probably a little overboard. And you have gotten much better recently with the tone and overall substance of your comments IMO. I think this is true for many folks around here (and definitely true for me, as many folks would be happy to attest to :-/).

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 10:56 AM EST up reply actions  

definitely true for me

(true for me in that I used to annoy the hell out of a lot of people, but I’ve gotten better and more balanced with my commentary, I think…)

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

I know I’ve fought with both you and C64.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 30, 2011 11:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah you were a complete &%&*h0L3, nah only kidding, it is good to have different opinions.

by champion64 on Nov 30, 2011 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

If everyone had the same opinion there’d be nothing to talk about and no comments on any articles. It would end up something like the UC Bearcats’ blog, Down the Drive. I went on there the first time and was depressed at the desolate wasteland I saw…

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe when we win a superbowl we will all be happy.

Every single comment ever will turn green.

by emily522 on Nov 30, 2011 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Mine may have been run-ons.

by SBP on Nov 30, 2011 3:29 PM EST up reply actions  

So if I am man enough to say it , I have to be man enough to take it and I do, from pretty much everyone

I respect you for this.

I am not saying that people should be more open to giving crap to you because you have been an active commenter for less, I was just saying that is how it works.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks, but its OK. There were a couple of replies I could have added but chose to ignore it.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we have a tendency to overvalue players on other teams. Dalton threw 3 INTs last week vs. the Ravens and then 2 vs. the Steelers. Colt did the same thing last year, and we were all freaking out about it.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Henry over values every player he brings up though. He was drooling over OMGbananas. And we all know he isn’t someone to waste a breath on.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 29, 2011 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

He’s a decent 3rd stringer I guess.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I wasn’t drooling over him like he’s Arian Foster, I think he’s a good 3rd down back that showed improvement in the short time he’s here.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Greater yards for a RB =/ improvement

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 29, 2011 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

It doesn’t? That’s their primary function – get as many yards as possible.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 6:58 PM EST up reply actions  

sure, but I think even a bad RB can succeed when he has wide open lane correct? Over the course of the 3 weeks he still hits his holes slowly, goes down on first contact and doesn’t fight for yards. It really showed on Sunday by watching Hillis simply fall forward for as many yards as OBGYN averaged.

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 29, 2011 7:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you’re strawmanning this. HD didn’t say he should be the starter, he said he was a good third down back, which he is.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

SB was right in the fact that he has hyped him up previously. Regardless I was explaining how despite his improved number I personally didn’t see him improving over the last three weeks, which HD stated.

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 29, 2011 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I think there has been a slight improvement, but it’s not really worth quibbling over. The guy is a third stringer at best and I hope he’s not on our team next year.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

None of that is true. He is not the fastest guy, but he hits holes slowly because he actually waits for the hole. He has good vision to find a hole. He has good hands. He only had 3 touches Sunday and ran for a first down on 1st and 10. It was a slashing run that was very impressive. Hillis rarely waits for a hole, but that’s his style of running, he’s generally going to smash out a few yards no matter what, you can’t compare the two styles. Ogbannya averged over 5 ypc his last game, what was Hillis’ average Sunday? Both performances against good defenses. I find it annoying that people overlook him as PS fodder even when he performs well on the field. People around here complain about depth but when we have good depth guys they hope we get rid of them?!?

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:39 PM EST up reply actions  

obi is definitely good depth. unfortunately, he’ll be practice squad or someone else’s depth next year when we re-sign hillis (damn right i said it) and b-jax is healthy.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 8:06 PM EST up reply actions  

If we don’t keep Hillis we better have a plan to bring in another good back.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 11:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t want to use the pick it would take to get him on a RB.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 11:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t either but he may be the BPA when we pick.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 11:28 PM EST up reply actions  

If Hardesty stays healthy (which I admit we haven’t been able to count on so far), have you all written him off as starting RB material? I’m not trying to argue for or against, I just want your thoughts.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 10:53 AM EST up reply actions  

my feeling is that hardesty has looked decent as a starter, but certainly not awesome. his drops alone are reason to question his viability as the top rb on any team. there are much better options available.

but it’s impossible not to think about his injuries. he’s too fragile to make the #1.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I’ve come to a similar conclusion. Maybe keep him around as a spell back for Hillis or whoever our starter is next year? Or should we just give up on him?

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

i think he’s absolutely worth keeping around. just don’t count on him for a whole hell of a lot.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I like Hardesty more than most around here.

I don’t trust him to be healthy.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 30, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I am actually curious, what you have seen from Hardesty that makes you like him more than most.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 3:15 PM EST up reply actions  

A lot of it has to do with his college days.

The kid has some really good tools, but I don’t think we will ever see it sadly.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 30, 2011 6:36 PM EST up reply actions  

This – Health is a big concern for me too

by SBP on Nov 30, 2011 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

He’d be a fantastic 1-2 punch with Hillis if he didn’t have Little hands and could stay upright.

by chitown browns fan on Nov 30, 2011 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

What makes you say he’d be fantastic as part of a 1-2 punch?

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 5:00 PM EST up reply actions  

We can only judge Hardesty when he’s 21 months+ out of ACL surgery and healthy.

Unfortunately, that might be never.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

He found holes that he wasn’t finding in his first few games. He was better in protection, too.

But he’s never going to be as dangerous of a guy that you want as a 3rd down back.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we were targeting Little. He and Julio have just about the same ceiling but Julio is closer to it. When you consider what we gained through the trade down we aren’t behind even if Little never gets to his ceiling.

by crazyL80 on Nov 30, 2011 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

If you have that kind of team, you can shift gears in strategy and bundle picks to move up and draft a star.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry if I am repeating myself, but my dream scenario is that Barkley or Griffin stay in school 1 more year and if we aren’t in a position to get Blackmon then we trade out, pick up another first in the 2013 draft. Add the best OLs and WRs with the picks we have (probably late first and a couple of seconds after the trade) and see if Colt is the man. If not we use our 2 firsts in 2013 to move up enough to take one of those 2 guys. If he is the QBOF then we just keep adding more talent. Profit.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

My dream scenario is that Blackmon falls to our first pick and RG3 falls to the Falcons pick. Unlikely, but it’s my dream.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

You like RG3? Doesn’t seem like a run and shoot type of quarterback? I have seen two games but both games were wide open quick play games and it was hard to get a great assessment other than if we constantly play in a two minute offense.

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

By the way I dont hate Colt McCoy, I root for him every game and hope it changes. I just think he is limited in his abilty to be a top “Playoff/Superbowl” type quarterback.

I am not big on Landy Jones, or Barkley. Luck seems to be a little more green than I thought. RG3 I have not completely watched but the two aforementioned games. Any other big armed college quarterback we are missing?

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I think all four of the top QBs are players.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree, ultimately would be fine drafting any of them.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, i think you’re right. i think jones is at least as good a pro prospect as bradford was, w/ less injury issues, barkley and luck are pretty even as far as i’m concerned, and rg3 is just a complete freak. i’d be happy w/ any of the 4 taking snaps in orange and brown.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Bradford made the system. The system made Landry Jones. Jones can’t carry Sam’s jock. Landry Jones does not perform well in big situations. Much better at home than the road. Did kick the Horns arse royally though – just not saying as much as when Bradford did.

Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen

by realmccoy on Nov 29, 2011 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Jones is my least favorite because he looks like he’s always in the gun, but he has good intangibles and physical attributes. He seems the least pro ready.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I am not so high on Barkley (he is still a good prospect), but yeah all these guys are really good.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

i realize the difference in talent catching the ball, but watch the usc/oregon game and then the stanford/oregon game and tell me there’s meaningful discrepancy b/w barkley and luck.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 6:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I have watched about 3 games of each. I do think Luck looks quite a bit better. Granted, I didn’t see luck’s worst game of the season, but I have still seen them play a common team (Washington, Arizona). To me, Luck does look better and its unfair to judge a QB on a SSS when it’s his worst game of the season.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 7:07 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe it was his worst game of the season for a reason?

barkley is awesome.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 8:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Barkley is good and I wouldn’t at all object to the Browns taking him (in fact, if Luck and Jones are gone, I may want him over RG3), but he isn’t my favorite QB prospect in this draft.

For some reason, he reminds me in some ways of BQ (guy who has good, but not elite height, pro style system, good but not elite arm), though I doubt he will bust. I like him, but I am not in love with him when watching him the way I am with Jones/Luck.

Barkley is not a bad prospect at all imo, just not my favorite.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 8:45 PM EST up reply actions  

But does he have elite arm length?

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 30, 2011 1:04 AM EST up reply actions  

what is his INNATE accuracy??

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

As opposed to what other kind of accuracy?

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

recurring joke, sorry.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Ah, I’m kind of new here. Didn’t catch that.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Jones’ decisionmaking worries the hell out of me. One of the most if not the most important quality in a QB.

Big, great arm.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

honestly, he’s the 1 of the 4 i’ve seen the least of.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Totally agree – I would take any one of them

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I think all four of the top QBs are players.

I’m a little worried about luck. I haven’t seen every single pass he’s made, but most of the time I see him throwing to completely wide open WR’s or his 6-8 TE’s. Don’t see a lot of NFL throws personally. He reminds me a lot of Sanchez.

I would completely stay away from Jones

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 29, 2011 6:42 PM EST up reply actions  

What do you think of the other 2?

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 6:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I like the fact that Matt has improved considerably every year. He plays like a professional. Goes through reads, pumps when he has to, I also like that he can throw pretty well anticipating a hit. I worry because USC’s air game primarily consisted of 0-10 yard passes and a LOT of sideways throws/bubble screens; and his deep balls aren’t the sharpest, but that’s primarily what a WCO consists off.

I love RGIII but I admit he’s sporadic at times. Sometimes his throws can’t be any better but there are also times where he could have a WR in great situation and miss by a mile. AMAZING footwork and vision though.

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 29, 2011 7:09 PM EST up reply actions  

i disagree on barkley’s deep balls. this year he’s been nails on those throws. of course, it helps to have uber-studs like marquise lee and robert woods, but barkley is delivering the deep ball like a pro.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think they’re horrible at all, but I do think his deep completions speak on Woods and Lee more than on the sharpness of the throws. Not something I would worry about too much though

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 30, 2011 12:50 AM EST up reply actions  

This is crazy. He makes throws every game that most NFL QBs can’t make. And, I don’t get the comparison to Sanchez?

by RyanBr on Nov 29, 2011 7:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I actually feel the same about Luck but got shot down and just figured I don’t see him enough to make that judgement based on 3 games watched. Glad me and Phil Simms aren’t the only ones who think this.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:04 PM EST up reply actions  

He’s pretty good. He has a big arm and throws bombs with good accuracy.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 29, 2011 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Mobile, accurate and can make deep throws. I tend to not let college systems affect my opinion too much, but it is a slight concern that he is the product of a Leach-based offense (Baylor’s coach used to be a TT assistant.) That said, he seems electric and has a strong arm.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 29, 2011 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I think anytime a guy has those kinds of numbers you have to pay attention. They might not translate directly to a “pro-style” system, but you can’t ignore the ridiculous stats he’s putting up.

I think that specific things about a QB matter more than the system and stats, but Griffin has made “NFL throws” and you can’t be inaccurate when you are 80% complete for that kind of YPA.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 29, 2011 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I am worried about David Klingler, Charlie Ward, those types. Numbers are only good to a point. If you dont have them it is a problem, but just because you have them doesn’t mean you are any good. I have not seen enough of RG3. One thing you knew you were getting from Rodgers from California was intelligence and good numbers (not great numbers) I think intelligence at the quarterback spot helps make a major difference, Cam Newton as far as fooball knowledge tested extremely well. Vince Young tested horribly and I think it shows. I am only talking quarterbacks.

It maybe interesting if these four quarterbacks are good enough to be drafted in the first round. It will give us options,

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

You shouldn’t look at numbers at all when evaluating college players. All the top yardage earners in NCAA history have sucked in the pros.

They evaluate these guys in much more detail, they look at throwing motion, footwork, release, vision, etc.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

they say comp % and td/int ratio are the only really important college stats

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

And even those are tricky.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Almost all of the college quarterbacks seem to have a 70% completetion rate, but when you are throwing 5-8 yard passes and hitting guys who always seem to be wide open , it does not seem to be the greatest measurement. I guess it is how they handle defenses and yes arm strength, and footwork

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Almost all of the college quarterbacks seem to have a 70% completetion rate

not shitty QBs from pro style offenses *cough*Clausen*cough*

The fact that there are a lot of “system QBs” out there is why it’s tricky. Comp % still is an important metric and has a significant correlation with success, enough for the 26-27-60 rule (QBs with 26 wonderlic, 27 starts, and 60 comp % in college tend to do well).

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 6:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Claussen may have been the most over hyped quarterback in recent memory. I never understood him. In PA they are wondering because of the Paterno mess if Matt McGloin will opt out for the draft. OMG who would draft that mess?

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 8:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Seriously, I think he might be the worst QB in the B10.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 8:45 PM EST up reply actions  

wow, if mcgloin seriously opts out, that would be dumb. He has the physical skills of Colt, except less so. Plus, he has never even been a full time player at his position and has never been anything special.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 8:49 PM EST up reply actions  

What do they have to do to be eligible for the draft?

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

3 years out of high school

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 29, 2011 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I think sign some papers and declare…and be a 3 years removed from HS (basically, Junior or RS Soph).

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

YPA is alright too. Nothing is film, though. Just like any football game.

And even when you have that, it’s not science.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I do agree intelligence is a big thing for QBs. Griffin graduated in 3 years. Speaks a lot to his intelligence and work ethic.

by RyanBr on Nov 29, 2011 7:03 PM EST up reply actions  

He comes from a military family and has a good head on his shoulders too.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Or to how Baylor treats kids that make them millions of dollars.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Also possible. Did Taylor graduate in 3 years?

by RyanBr on Nov 29, 2011 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Taylor didn’t make them millions of dollars. No one shows up to watch DTs play.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 7:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I wasn’t trying to start an argument with you.

by RyanBr on Nov 29, 2011 7:29 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s low. Why would you diminish his achievement by suggesting that Baylor essentially handed him a diploma?

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

yea I though I was a pessimist.

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 29, 2011 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

No, you are.

"It is unlikely that anyone has ever read Nietzsche or Derrida and has been inspired to open a soup kitchen"

by troy145 on Nov 30, 2011 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not saying we should assume he didn’t earn it. I’m just saying we shouldn’t assume he did. I hate to be so cynical, but being a big time athlete at a D1 school has its benefits sometimes.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 11:21 PM EST up reply actions  

It always has benefits – lots of them but I would say you should assume the degree was earned unless proven otherwise. I can’t for the life of me ever hearing anyone question Andrew Luck’s degree. Isn’t Baylor a pretty respected military academy?

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 11:30 PM EST up reply actions  

i think it’s more a christian school than military academy.

incidentally, rg3 is like olympic-quality in the 400 hurdles. says nothing of his academic, but the guy is a total freak.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I am telling you, Randall Cunningham part 2.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

i’m with you. and i would gladly sign up for that.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

How big was Randall? Just looking at RG3, i’d be worried about him holding up if he ran a lot in the NFL.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

6’4, 215.

RG3 is 6’2, 220.

by Roger Dorn on Nov 30, 2011 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I still think RG3’s figures are inflated, but if he can get to 220 at the combine that’s pretty solid size.

Is the concussion serious?

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:46 AM EST up reply actions  

everything i’ve seen says, “concussion-like symptoms” as opposed to flat out “concussion”. i don’t know the regulations and such in college, so maybe this is a semantics trick, but it seems like he’s ok. it may not mean a lot, but he was ready to go back in the game.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 1, 2011 12:59 AM EST up reply actions  

He is supposed to play Saturday.

He took one hell of a shot.

by Bernie19Kosar on Dec 1, 2011 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I loved watching Randall play, but he didn’t accomplish a whole lot, and he was on some real good teams in his prime with the Eagles. So, I am not sure I want Randall Cunningham part 2 (obviously, he was better than any of the crap we have had to date but that should be obvious).

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Nov 30, 2011 5:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ll question Luck’s degree too.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 1, 2011 2:04 AM EST up reply actions  

instead of making baseless assumptions, lets look at the evidence we have.

-All reports say he is intelligent and a hard worker
-His major is political science, certainly not the hardest major, but not one of those bullshit ones you see athletes have
-Both his parents are retired military officers. The military teaches you discipline, so think about the likelihood of him being highly disciplined.

Instead of just coming out with baseless accusations that Baylor gave him a diploma, consider that what evidence we have suggests the contrary to him just getting a “football degree”.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 12:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Instead of just coming out with baseless accusations that Baylor gave him a diploma

Before you get all riled up can you show me where I did this?

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 1:02 AM EST up reply actions  

by saying that RG3 graduating in 3 years is an example of how Baylor treats their star players.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:10 AM EST up reply actions  

He said “or” as in “could also mean” not “is” or “it definitely means that”. Chill Bross.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 30, 2011 1:16 AM EST up reply actions  

even the implication is stupid without any sort of evidence.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:49 AM EST up reply actions  

No it’s not. Division 1 schools cheat players through all the time. Hell, division 3 schools cheat players through often enough. It is not unreasonable to keep that possibility in mind.

Also, I didn’t imply anything. You inferred something.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 10:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I’d say its a significant implication.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

No, it’s a significant inference.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 1, 2011 2:05 AM EST up reply actions  

As a huge OSU homer and alumni, a communications degree there is a joke if you want it to be.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re Terrel Pryor?

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 11:12 PM EST up reply actions  

for evidence, please see the entire history of collegiate sports. ever.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

The evidence is the state of collegiate football, academics, and the NCAA.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Still I don’t see anyone saying anything about Luck or Manning that indicates their degree’s were handed to them. I’m going to let this go now.

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 11:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Well as for Luck, it’s Stanford. You really think they care about football more than academics?

As for the Mannings, I don’t think the SEC is exactly clean.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 12:50 AM EST up reply actions  

if you’re taking a race angle, i think matthew stafford probably went to approximately 9 classes in his entire career at georgia.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 1, 2011 1:01 AM EST up reply actions  

See also: Matt Leinart and ballroom dancing.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Dec 1, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I think every single quarterback drafted in the first round has some question marks surrounding their academic record by default.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 1, 2011 2:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m just saying we shouldn’t assume he did

Whaat?

by The Licensed Pessimist on Nov 30, 2011 12:49 AM EST up reply actions  

I think it sucks that I have to be so skeptical in situations like this but I don’t think it’s unfair. I am not saying anything shady happened here. In fact, it is more likely that the guy earned his grades and diploma. All I have said the whole time is that there is a non-trivial chance that he was given some extra “help.” It happens all the time in D1 sports.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 1:03 AM EST up reply actions  

You could say that about any player, but Griffin has shown he’s legit on many levels yet this is the first time you’ve questioned it.

I’m really going to drop it now.

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 11:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I want to be clear I’m not being specific to Griffin. I really don’t know the details of his specific case. I’m merely pointing out that with any star football player universities have been known to make their classes a little less of a distraction.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 1, 2011 2:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Or to how Baylor treats kids that make them millions of dollars

Anything here in regards to RG3 is pure speculation. No reports surround this and saying this is shooting blindly in the dark.

There is also no precedent at all to my knowledge of Baylor doing this before and handing degrees to students in 3 years.

Basically, if it didn’t happen, you are pulling all this out of your ass.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 12:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Calm down buddy. I am in no way accusing Baylor of doing anything shady. I’m just saying the possibility is there, and it’s a real one. There is a more than 0% chance that a school would work some magic to make sure the football star got good grades. It happens all the time.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 1:01 AM EST up reply actions  

I am in no way accusing Baylor of doing anything shady.

No, you imply it is an explanation for why RG3 graduated in 3 years.

There is a more than 0% chance that a school would work some magic to make sure the football star got good grades.

There is also more than a 0% chance that RG3 is actually a member of mensa and has kept it from the media.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:12 AM EST up reply actions  

No, you imply it is a possible explanation for why RG3 graduated in 3 years.

There is a greater than 0% chance you are blowing this way out of proportion.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Nov 30, 2011 1:18 AM EST up reply actions  

and there is greater than a 0% chance that, especially considering multiple people’s reactions, the comment NTN made is an example of why there should be an edit button.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:50 AM EST up reply actions  

I can’t help it if people are going to infer things I didn’t say. That’s out of my control. Maybe if you read more carefully this wouldn’t have been a problem.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 10:06 AM EST up reply actions  

I can’t help it if people are going to infer things I didn’t say.

you can by not posting something that even if it is not a direct implication (which you insist it’s not), is something that is extremely likely to be inferred a certain way, a way now you are saying you did not mean for it to be inferred.

If you wanted to offer the theory, the comment that you posted, especially considering the context, was not effective and gave pretty much everyone the wrong message.

And while you can say “that’s out of my control”, it really isn’t. If you word something that everyone takes completely the wrong way, its at least partly on you.

I am not trying to be that overly critical, I do it too.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Only people looking for a fight found one.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 1, 2011 2:09 AM EST up reply actions  

ok. yeah, now you need to just stop. Its completely asinine to say that anyone who took your statement the way I did was looking for a fight. I certainly wasn’t.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Dec 1, 2011 2:45 AM EST up reply actions  

this is demonstrably false given your endless string of comments on a semantics issue (again). just end it. this sucks to read.

by DontCallMeJoey on Dec 1, 2011 12:33 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

If you weren’t looking for a fight then you weren’t reading carefully. You put words in my mouth and argued against something I never said.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 1, 2011 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

you weren’t reading carefully

I guess the several posters who also saw it this way must have just not been reading carefully and it’s their fault, not yours for bad wording in the context.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Dec 1, 2011 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Just let it go. He had a theory, he explained it. You don’t agree.

Let it go.

by Bernie19Kosar on Dec 1, 2011 6:09 PM EST up reply actions  

If you count 2 or 3 people as several than yes, but I see just as many, if not more telling you to chill out and stop overreacting.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Dec 1, 2011 6:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Dude. Just. Quit.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Dec 1, 2011 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

and there is greater than a 0% chance that, especially considering multiple people’s reactions, the comment NTN made is an example of why there should be an edit button.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 1:50 AM EST up reply actions  

and there is greater than a 0% chance that, especially considering multiple people’s reactions, the comment NTN made is an example of why there should be an edit button.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 30, 2011 2:46 AM EST up reply actions  

right … baylor athletics is a beacon of propriety and clean dealings. especially if you don’t consider murder to be that big of a deal.

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

like I said “to my knowledge”, I guess the school isn’t as clean as I perceived it.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 30, 2011 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

speaking of pulling things from ass-regions…

by DontCallMeJoey on Nov 30, 2011 2:39 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

You don’t draft purely on numbers because of Colt Brennan, Timmy Chang, Graham Harrell, etc. A lot of those guys are accurate passers, which you have to be to complete 70%+, but you don’t succeed based on accuracy alone in the NFL.

All I am saying is numbers tell you something, but they don’t tell you everything.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Your signature really says it all in this case.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

He’s also very smart and has high character value from what I have read.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I would like to know more, we dont get to see many Baylor games

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

You tube – just highlights of course but you’ll see, guy is sick

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Some of his throws are just…wow.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

ESPN3.com will let you watch a lot of old games if you’re interested. Not sure how many Baylor games they have up.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 29, 2011 5:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah that would be a lot easier and better.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I actually think this is possible. Depends how far RG3 shoots up the draft boards, and of course, where the Falcon’s pick ends up.

by RyanBr on Nov 29, 2011 6:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t understand this, but I do like it. Still, I’m confused as to why.

by chitown browns fan on Dec 1, 2011 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I get it, and I was the one who rec’d it.

by Brownie's Year on Dec 1, 2011 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

ColtMcCoy Colt McCoy
RT"@CowboyMinistry: Ask any cow, findin’ the gate ain’t what’s hard. It’s gettin’ the courage to be the first one through."

Oh man. These cow/barn/farm saying are excellent.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 5:00 PM EST reply actions  

What’s the story with Mike Floyd? I really like the dude and every time I see him he’s making plays. He doesn’t get a ton of press… Where would he go (of WRs) in the draft?

"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur

by LocalMan on Nov 29, 2011 5:13 PM EST reply actions  

2nd or 3rd WR taken is my guess. I think there are pretty serious off-field concerns with him.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Delhomme is back. Now with the Texans. Good Luck there

by champion64 on Nov 29, 2011 5:42 PM EST reply actions  

OT but part of LeBron’s twitter background as a poster of Ohio saying “we still love you LeBron” and a pic of Cavs fans wearing his jersey. What. A. Douche.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 10:01 PM EST reply actions  

I can’t believe he’s even at this game. Sometimes I feel almost a little tiny bit sorry for him. Mostly just sad that he made such a poor decision.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 10:12 PM EST up reply actions  

They keep mentioning him and showing him on camera.

by emily522 on Nov 29, 2011 10:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I know, it’s gross but this game has been awesome

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 10:23 PM EST up reply actions  

an ol’ fashioned whuppin’.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Nov 29, 2011 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Just re-watched the first half. Norwood catches a short pass in front of the goal line for a first down and gets absolutely pummeled right as the ball gets there and still makes the catch. I want these guys getting more playing time. Norwood should be starting.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 10:11 PM EST reply actions  

Well for all the drops, Little did make a lot of nice catches and was able to get open so there’s hope for him.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 10:53 PM EST reply actions  

Watching the replay of the McCoy int. Colt’s rolling out, he has Little deep. Reggie Nelson slides by Pashos shoves Nelson except he accelerates him right into McCoy’s midsection as he’s releasing the ball. He would have been better off just standing there. Still a bad pass, questionable decision by McCoy.

by HenryDawg on Nov 29, 2011 10:57 PM EST reply actions  

What do you think of mcCoy’s performance in the second half with the game on the line?

by champion64 on Nov 30, 2011 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it’s hard to isolate just his performance in this one. He wasn’t great, no arguement there, by I don’t think he was the big thing holding the team back. I’m not sure there was one thing that made us lose this game.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Nov 30, 2011 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I just thought the last two games a drive at the end of the game to put it away is what we needed. Last week the (against the Bengals) it was like teh definition an inept offense. I really thought they would do it this time and it was more of the same. I forget the exact number of yards we had in the second half but it wasn’t much. (tongue in cheek for all of you who mocked me saying it was only 87 yards and 45 of it was on the ground, ok just joking no need for an argument, making light of my prior post)

by champion64 on Nov 30, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

a drive at the end of the game to put it away is what we needed…

Yeah, actually we had one going there with about 35 seconds left. Greg Little ended it with his drop of a perfect pass on a 20 yard route that would have put us near mid-field. (maybe wouldn’t have “put it away” but certainly could have gotten into field goal range for the tie…).

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

You know that pass I think was questionable, NOT THE ACTUAL PASS, it was on the money I thought they would only work the sidelines. Say he runs for a second and gets tackled after catching the pass, THe clock after the drop was at :27. so if he caught it , the fastest they could have gotten up, set and spiked it, would have been around 15 seconds. He then would have to have hit a sideline pattern with about 7 second to go and try a 50 plus yard field goal. It would have been hard, but not impossible. I think they had enough time to get in place. It just never happened.

by champion64 on Nov 30, 2011 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I’d have to watch it from a couple different angles but I’m guessing they had probably forced our receivers to the inside / locking out any sideline routes (I’m sure rufio could break this down and explain it better than I…).

That was my understanding.

by burntorangeandbrown on Nov 30, 2011 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I haven’t had time to rewatch this one yet.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Nov 30, 2011 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Always awkward when you trash a guy and he then shows up.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Nov 30, 2011 2:06 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

I checked his profile, and he just joined today. Looks like he saw the conversation here and it incited a retort.

"Tracers work both ways" ~US Army Ordnance

by roar888 on Nov 30, 2011 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m glad he decided to join the conversation.

by Bernie19Kosar on Nov 30, 2011 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

it’s not when it’s on the internet.

by Brownie's Year on Nov 30, 2011 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I think its awesome. Well done by Frowns and DBN.

by HenryDawg on Nov 30, 2011 11:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / @# / !@
Small
Top 5 Bubble Players
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Buddhathomas_small
Cleveland Browns 2012 Prediction - A Sailor's Perspective
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / !^ / !@
Cribbs_small
2012 Rookie Predictions
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
A look of the 2012 Browns O-line
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / ( / !@
00000021_small
browns Q for 12 who are they
Gray_cat_thinking_small
That time of year again.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Hadenward-new2_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

N3tdgy_medium_small Brownie's Year

Polar_cap_of_mars_planet_small notthatnoise