Poll: Who Should See Reps at the Wide Receiver Position?
Why isn't Jordan Norwood getting more snaps?
Why hasn't Carlton Mitchell been featured prominently in the offense yet given his "potential?"
These two receives were elevated on the depth chart last week due to Mohamed Massaquoi being out (concussion) and Brian Robiskie on the verge of being cut. Both Norwood and Mitchell have had fans who have been vocal about their wishes to see each player be involved in the offense. The question is this: just how involved should they be in the offense, given the fact that three receivers are ahead of them on the depth chart? (Side note: Shurmur confirmed that Mitchell would be active again this week).
I think the person who is least likely to have reps taken away from him is Greg Little, given the team's investment in him and the fact that he has received the most reps at the position this season. Joshua Cribbs and Mohamed Massaquoi don't have a lot of catches, but each of them have made some clutch receptions late in games.
I know that really good teams like the Green Bay Packers would have no issues mixing in their fourth- and fifth-receivers, but given our ineptness offensively this season, it seems like it would be easier said than done for Pat Shurmur and the Browns.
This is an open-ended poll with two questions:
-Should Norwood and/or Mitchell be much more involved in the offense (more so than they were last week)?
-If so, who should see less reps at the receiver position between Little, Cribbs, and Massaquoi?
Feel free to share a rep ratio for the five wideouts.
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
at this point, we really should try anything and EVERYTHING to revive our offense. or whats left of it. give the ball to everyone. if someone can make a freakin catch, then we use them. if someone drops the ball, they should be forced to do pushups on the sidelines in front of the whole crowd.
Smile big, hug bigger. Talk big, act bigger. Stop judging do something, shut the fck up do something.
Little, Norwood, Massaquoi, Cribbs, Moore.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
Those should be the five that see reps, the first three should see most of the reps.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
I like this, assuming that we also throw in Moore at the tight end position a few times too (two tight end sets). Little, Norwood, and Massaquoi seem like a good group. Then, when Cribbs does come in the game, he can be a threat on reverses, quick bubble screens, or down-the-sideline passes. He’s shown that he’s not one-dimensional, so I don’t think having him in every so often would tip off the defense as to what play we planned on running.
Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.
by Chris Pokorny on Nov 4, 2011 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions
Norwood showed serious signs of life last week. I like having him in the top 3 as well, but Massaquoi is supposed to be the #1 guy. I know he’s been out, but we need to keep him as involved as we can. As for Cribbs, we haven’t really utilized his offensive abilities in respect to reserves or “creativity” (which may just feel more dramatic in comparison to how often we saw the Wildcat in the past). He made a couple of beautiful catches when we needed ‘em, but I’d rather see more balls going to Little and Massaquoi.
Little, Norwood, Cribbs/mass splitting 3rd spot. I feel like I’ve seen momass run some lazy routes or give up too early. Plus everyone knows to hit him hard in the head and he’s done for the day. No clue about Mitchell yet.
Resident of Believeland.
by browndawgbacker on Nov 4, 2011 10:16 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions
I like this combo the best so far. Little has proven he deserves it. Norwood showed some good things last week. Cribbs is too much of a playmaker not to try and get him the ball but he’s not the best receiver. MoMass can make a big catch, but he’s been showing some frailty on the field and I think that will affect his aggressiveness.
Even Doug Dieken admits Joe Thomas is the real #73
Joe Thomas, Greg Little, Mo Mass, Norwood… There has to be a reason why Shurmur won’t get Moore more involved and I don’t think that’s going to change the rest of the year.
At any rate, they need a consistent lineup each week if we’re going to see any progress here. And stop dropping passes.
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
by LocalMan on Nov 4, 2011 10:42 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
JT was just assumed to be our #1 I believe for all positions.
Moore does deserve to play more downs I think just due to the match up problems he creates.
Resident of Believeland.
by browndawgbacker on Nov 4, 2011 11:37 AM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions
I thought it was because when Pashos was injured before, we needed to put Alex Smith to help block but out seems thats not the case because Pashos is no longer injured.
by macdowellm03 on Nov 4, 2011 11:56 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Pashos > Tebow
"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"
by Gradysmanldy on Nov 4, 2011 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Not sure if this was just a joke or whatever, but after watching not one, but two lineman go for big gains against us last week, I came away not mad that they beat us with that, just mad that we weren’t the ones to use it first.
I realize that defenses might not bite as hard on our run threat as teams do with the 49ers, but when your offense is struggling as much as ours, it seems like its time to get extra creative to at least get something going. Then when you realize it was a rookie HC on their side of the field also, it just makes Shurmur look bad.
I sincerely think Moore should be moved into a Jurevicious type role as a slot receiver. Then find some creative ways to get the ball into JC’s hands… jet sweeps, direct snaps.. something, anything, he’s too talented to not be getting carries when the offense is this anemic.
@LancelotSchmidt
That is a correct statement, he was here in 07 and was the 3rd down go too guy. When we needed 10 yards he got us 13, hardly anything ever got by him, wish we still had him.
by Steve n NC on Nov 4, 2011 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Side note: Andre Jonhson didn’t practice again yesterday. One writer over at Battle Red would be really surprised if he plays this week.
Perhaps they feel they can do it w/ out Johnson and they give him an extra week rest.
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
Norwood looks good to me, keep him playing. I think we give mitchell waaay more playing time. I mean how can our offense possibly be any worse?
by macdowellm03 on Nov 4, 2011 11:53 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
I’d like to see the two rookie 6’3" receivers(Little/Mitchell) out there on the field for an entire game to see what they have to offer and if they step up their play during game time. Cribbs and Norwood could switch off in the slot, but Cribbs seems to flourish most in traffic. Use him creatively at running back. direct snap it to him or try some end arounds… if it isn’t productive at least it’ll be fun to watch.
Colt is the answer, winning is the question...
Hillis just left practice because of an injury.
"That’s the reality of it and I live in that reality." Shurmur
As in a few weeks long injury. Hammy blew out.
In Golan we trust.
by SpecialBrownie on Nov 4, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions
personally i would really like to see mitchell get featured a whole game just to see what he can do. If he is this log threat that everyone says he is, why dont they try him out because even if he isnt that great its better than what they have now. But as an order of receivers if i was shurmur i would have it like this : Little Mitchell, MoMass Norwood.
Moore should be peppered in throughout the offence but since he is versitile to what poisiiton he plays i have a hard time fitting him into that list.
where is cribbs you ask? i think him as a receiver has been tried and he has panned out to be nothing but a space filling receiver, i really really really want to see him at running back, i think cribbs is at his best when he has the field infront of him
Greg Little is a big, strong receiver with good ability for YAC, and he should continue to get the most playing time. I’d like to see Norwood in the slot, running some quick routes, trying to get him some nice matchups. MoMass does a serviceable job on the other side. When one of the most tantalizing options for our offense is splitting a tight end (granted, one with good hands and a lot of unrealized potential) out into the slot, it speaks volumes.
Spergon for the Wynn
I love Little and he needs to be featured as much as possible. I also like Norwood and momass teaming up for the 2/3 role and cribbs maybe getting some reps.
I would also like to see mitchell, but I am not going to be advocating playing him a ton. He has nice deep speed, let him run some deep patterns every once in a while. Out of 3-4 WR sets, I’d like to see him running some deeper routes.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013

by 





















