Browns 2011 Free Agency Preview
Oftentimes free agency is all about connections. As we say with Romeo Crennel and Eric mangini, they brought in several players who ran their system, they had a connection to and knew what they could do, and could communicate to the other players what the coaches looked for. With the recent moves cutting several veterans, I believe we are going to see (if the CBA gets done), a multitude of signings by the browns, picking up players with connections to this team. We freed 16 million dollars in cap room and I doubt H&H are going to let that go to waste. I will break down players who are currently free agents that I think will be targeted. I will highlight their connection to the team, a brief summary of their skills, and why they will fit the browns.
Now, not all free players in free agency are guys with a connection to the team but it definitely helps and there are options at our positions of need that have connections to our coaching staff/front office.
Quarterback:
matt Hasselbeck: Who knows how much he has left. Still, I would much rather put the ball in his hands if necessary than the hands of Delhomme or Seneca. Plus, he started over Wallace and played in that offense for longer. Unless he still wants a starters job (and who will give it to him at this point?), he will likely want to go to an offense where he is comfortable.
Running Back: There isn't a lot here I see the browns going after. No one with a Jauron/Holmgren/Heckert/Schurmur connection. maybe they go after Leon Washington or Sproles, but those are just guys I see as needs, not guys I seriously see us going after since they are more scatbacks.

Wide Receiver:
Steve Breaston: Although Billy Davis is on Defense, these connections aren't out of the question. Whisenhunt brought in Joey Porter. Plus, Schurmur and Holmgren both went against him in the division. When healthy, he is solid #2 WR who has good hands and solid deep speed.
Danny Amendola: He was a WR in St. Louis that Schurmur used very effectively. He is a young slot receiver who also has good deep speed and excellent return man skills. He can add depth to our WRs and be a solid #2/slot. I think we sign at least one of Amendola and Clayton
mark Clayton: He was also on the Rams and had a good season until his season ended abruptly. He is a possession WR with some speed and is a decent blocker. Right now, either him or Amendola is probably an upgrade to Robi.
Offensive Line:
Sean Locklear: He was drafted in Seattle by Holmgren. He definitely fits a need at Right Tackle (and I think Holmgren has been eying him for a while and the St. Clair release is more evidence). Locklear had a down year last year, but that was mostly due to him being forced to play LT. He is a Pass Blocking RT who is maybe slightly below average in the run game. he has had some injuries, but is still relatively young for a Lineman.
Langston Walker: He was with Oakland Last year where our D-Line coach was. He is a mauler at RT, though he is a bit like St. Clair only better in Pass Pro. I honestly don't think he would be a great fit because he is just a bit better, bit younger version of St. Clair.
Deuce Lutui: He is a very solid Guard for Arizona; where our LB coach was DC. Lutui is young (28) and is a quality guard run blocking or in pass pro. He would be a very good fit a RG and would be an instant upgrade to Porkchop.
Chris Spencer: Spencer was drafted by holmgren and played for him for a while. He is a quality starter on the interior of the line and like Lutui is still under 30. His position in the NFL is Center. Yes, mack is awesome but god forbid he is out for a game or two, What do we do then? Spencer can start though at guard too. He played guard for most of his college career and his first year or so in the pros. He could be like a better version of Rex Hadnot.
Defensive Line:
Charles Johnson: Johnson played in Carolina. We do not have any coaches from there, but Holmgren is close to John Fox and he may use this to look at players from Carolina. Johnson is not an elite size or speed guy, but has very good quickness and strength and instincts. He plays the run well and just has a knack for being in the backfield. We could definitely used a balanced DE like him.
Ray Edwards: Another guy who played with a coach with ties to H&H but not for them themselves. Childress had his big break in the pros in Philly so there is that connection. Both he and Johnson are young players which is a plus. Edwards is your classic pass rush specialist; elite burst, good size and quickness, overruns some plays and not amazing against the run.
Cullen Jenkins: Now he has no connection other than Holmgren might still have connections in Green Bay. However a lot of people are talking about the browns targeting him. he is a very good pass rushing DT with quickness, but is 30 and has injury problems. He may not be what the browns are looking for, especially at the price he will demand.
Brandon mebane: mebane was drafted by Holmgren and is a bit of an underrated player. He is still in his mid 20s. He is solid against the run and a decent pass rusher. He doesn't get a ton of sacks, but does do a good job of collapsing the pocket and getting into the backfield. Not an elite skill set, but he has a high motor and good instincts. I think Holmgren is also targeting him and I would like the browns to get him.
John Henderson: Played DT under our DL coach in Oakland. He is a very good run stopper but is 32 now. If he signs for a cheaper deal, I think he would be a solid fit as a reserve DT who can stuff the run.
Alan Branch: Similar size and skills to Henderson at this point but is younger. He played with Billy Davis in Arizona. He can be a very nice reserve for us with some upside and a potential starter.
Linebacker:
James Anderson: Played in carolina under John Fox. He is a very good Will LB and that is the one I fear we will be the thinnest at. He is an athletic LB who can cover and get into the backfield.
Ben Leber: A consistent starter at Will LB for Chilly. He is getting older but is a good blitzer and tackler and a very smart player. At this point, I think the browns should be looking at younger players, but he would be an acceptable stopgap option at WLB.
Leroy Hill: Hill was drafted by Holmgren in Seattle: when healthy and focused, he is a very solid starter at Will LB. He is a good pass rusher and attacks the line well and is great in pursuit. I worry about his health and his off the field issues, but he could be a bargain find.
David Vobora: He was a starter in St. Louis last year. We have guys who I think can play sam LB like Fujita, but we could use some youth. I thin gocong has more limited upside than Vobora in a 4-3 at the SLB. Vobora is instinctive and has underrated athleticism. He adds youth to the position and could possibly challenge for a starting LB spot.
Paul Posluzny: He has the connection in that he was drafted when Jauron was in Buffalo and played for jauron and Jauron's D. Getting him at this point is a pipe dream. He can tackle and play the run, blitz, play coverage well, and overall is a star linebacker when healthy. any team would need a guy like him at ILB.
Stewart Bradley: Drafted in Philly when heckert was there. Before the ACL injury was a very good ILB. Since he came back, he is only average. He may be suited for SLB at this point if he doesn't recover more. Even at ILB, he would still be an upgrade at a large position of need.
Kirk morrison: Played in 2009 for Oaklnd where Board (our DL coach) coached. He is probably a league ILB, but at this point I would take that. He is solid against the run and average in pass coverage. he is also still under 30.
Defensive Back:
Richard marshall: Similar to Wright. He is very talented but underachieved, though was a bit better than Wright this year. He may get too large of a contract but for the right price, he would be a nice get. if motivated, might actually challenge for a starting spot.
Kelly Jennings: Drafted by Holmgren in 2006. Jennings is a solid starter and is still under 30. He is not very physical and not a great tackler, but has good anticipation an instincts and makes a good amount of plays in coverage. I think he could possibly replace brown as a starter and let Brown play the slot or play FS.
Drayton Florence: Played in Buffalo under Jauron and would know Jauron's coverages and style. He is 30 so he would be a short term option. He is also probably a slot/3rd CB at this point. He is a good 3rd CB and probably can be had for a bargain. If we can't get marshall or Jennings, he would be a good option because we need another body back there.
Quintin mikell: Played his whole career in Philly and was drafted when heckert was there. Is already 30 so isn't an option for a long time. However, he is a pro bowl Safety who can play either safety position and break up plays in coverage or stuff the run. He is also a good blitzer.
George Wilson: He is a backup FS in Buffalo and played under Jauron. Understands routes being a former WR. Incredible instincts and a knack for makign plays in Centerfield. Blossomed late and is already 30 so not a ton of upside or long term presence. However, he can be a good veteran presence in our young secondary. He is also an excellent Special Teams player and we could use a couple more of those.
michael Huff: he started in Oakland where Board coached. He is very solid in run support but can also run with pretty much any slot WR. Not great instincts or anticipation, but a solid FS/SS nonetheless. He is a decent fit
and maybe Jauron can develop him to reach his star potential.
Kicker:
David Akers: Has been in Philly forever. He would probably be an upgrade from Dawson (sorry all you dawson lovers out there). Automatic kicker who has a good leg from outside 40 yards. It looks like we may need to find another kicker and he is a great short term option.
Olindo mare: He was signed in 2008 by Holmgren in Seattle. He has an incredible leg and can make very long kicks well. He is a great kickoff kicker and is very clutch. a bit streaky at times, but would be an excellent short term option like Akers.
These obviously aren't all the players the browns will target. If you have any other ideas, discuss...
This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.
99 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Charles Johnson would be a coup. How likely are the Panthers to franchise tag him with the shift to Rivera’s 3-4?
If you don't respect Aaron Laffey, I will fight you.
by Cap'n Snegiryov on Feb 11, 2011 11:07 AM EST reply actions
Nice write-up bross. Of everything you mentioned, I like the idea of the kickers most. We need someone who can give us consistent touchbacks. That may be one of the most underrated aspects of the game by fans.
Always my biggest complaint about Dawson. He had the abilty to get it to the end zone when he was pumped up after a big play by the O, but mostly just barely got the ball to the opposing 12yd line. Special teams coverage has to be that much better when you give the return team that kind of head start.
What does that MEAN - TO PLAY US OUT?!!?!?
Dawson has the leg for it. He’s lacking ‘touch’. Its either driver or 2 iron for Phil. You ask him to lay up and he comes a club short.
Go Large! It's only $0.59 more.
by GhostRider94 on Feb 14, 2011 2:17 PM EST up reply actions
Great post bross.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion.
by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 11, 2011 1:37 PM EST reply actions
I’m not sure I see the Browns going after him, but I wouldn’t mind Deangelo Williams. His speed could pair well with the power of Hillis.
"There is a small, but important difference between peeing in the pool and peeing into the pool." - Demitri Martin
I considered the John Fox connection and the fact that he was a need, but I really didn’t see it happening. I don’t know exactly why, but he doesn’t seem like a guy they will go after. I may add him though…
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Been watching this guy ever since he arrived at Carolina. If, somehow, the Panthers fail to resign him, I sure hope H&H at least inquire what it would take to bring him to Cleveland. Not only is he quick and elusive but he breaks tackles all over the field and has good strength between the tackles. His special teams play is another nice bonus giving us more options and depth.
One thousand-yard back was pretty cool. Can you imagine two in the same year again? It’s been a long time.
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is. -- Yogi Berra
by JustPlainBrowns on Feb 11, 2011 7:52 PM EST up reply actions
Interested in Locklear, Lutui, Jennings, Huff, and Mare. Anyone on the Defensive Line is worth looking at because, as far as I am concerned, we have only one solid starter and we are unsure how he is going to do in the switch to a 4-3.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion.
by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 11, 2011 3:49 PM EST reply actions
Going to respond to both your comments in one.
I like Locklear and Lutui too. Lutui would be a great signing. I really think Holmgren has been targeting Locklear and I think he is a nice player. Same with Kelly Jennings. I would like michael Huff if we don’t have to get into a bidding war with Al Davis.
I also seriously think that holmgren made those deals to spend the big bucks. He definitely has spent in free agency, especially on the D-Line. I think we get either one of the pass rushers; maybe edwards since there is more of a direct connection. I also am about 60% certain we sign mebane.
And I would love Hasselbeck as a mentor/spot starter; filling the role JD/Seneca would play. The only team I really see would be seattle, but I think they want to see what they have in Whitehurst or draft someone else and try to figure out their QB situation going forward.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
no links, but i believe i’ve heard that there’s no chance the vikes let edwards get away, and pete carroll has said they want hasselbeck back in sea.
how recovered are clayton (wr) and bradley (lb) likely to be from two pretty big injuries?
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 16, 2011 12:36 AM EST up reply actions
I hope not. He is my #1 target on D. the dude is a monster. but if we can get either DE, I would be fine.
I don’t know about clayton. The injury does not seem that serious and most things i read talk about having him back at full strength for 2011. Bradley’s injury last year was not too serious, but his ACL in 2009 was. However, he will be 2 years removed from it so it should be fully healed. ACLs can linger for a year or so, but generally they are healthy with the right treatment after 2 years (though I do not pretend to be an expert on them.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
ACL timetable is usually playing in 9 months, full speed in a year and nine months.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
Should also note that Hasselbeck would be a great signing as a mentor to Colt and a spot starter when needed but I think he could demand a lot of money and there are teams out there, including Seattle, that would give him a starting job right now.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion.
by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 11, 2011 3:51 PM EST reply actions
Lutui and Branch would be my top two targets here. Obviously I would like Pos. Huff would be ok too, as would Jenkins and Edwards.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
Posluzny was a hard worker in college and was a fan favorite because of it; he’s also just a damn good football player. I’m sure it’s my PSU homerism, but I’d be thrilled to have him here.
he is in the upper half of ILB starters and possibly a star in the making. Its not just homerism. Even on a bad D, any player who can record 150 tackles in a season is pretty darn solid
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
He would be a good starter for us, I just don’t think Buffalo will let him go.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
i like the sound of branch, too. he and tuba could be pretty beasty.
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 16, 2011 12:37 AM EST up reply actions
OK call me crazy but…
I noticed Haloti Ngata is set to be a FA this offseason. Any chance at all the Ravens don’t re-sign him? I know they love him over there but he’s going to want a big fat contract… Think the Browns have a shot?
the ravens put a non-exclusive franchise tag on him today … they can match any offer he gets OR get 2 1st rounders from a team that does sign him away.
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 16, 2011 12:39 AM EST up reply actions
I would love us to get Charles Johnson. He is one of a few guys on here I would actually try to start a campaign among fans to chalk up a few bucks to give to randy lerner. I know he has the $, thats just how much I want a guy like Johnson.
Huff I like too, but he may be hard to pry away from Al Davis.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Dude, Johnson would be such a great signing. One of the best DEs in football this year, and he’s only 26.
If you don't respect Aaron Laffey, I will fight you.
by Cap'n Snegiryov on Feb 12, 2011 1:41 AM EST up reply actions
Agreed on Will Hill.
I consider that pile of garbage untouchable, even with a 10 foot pole. Even if he had the talent, which he doesn’t, it wouldn’t make up for his likely off field head aches.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
First off , its a great post ! Well done.
I don’t see DT Henderson coming if we are trying to get younger . DT Alan Branch would be interesting . Do you think Brian Shaefering will move inside to DT ?
DE’s Charles Johnson and Ray Edwards would be welcomed in that order.
LB Posluzny and Anderson would be a huge boost.
Safety Michael Huff ? I liked him in the draft , what happened to him ? How good is he now ?
OG Deuce Lutui would be a good addition as we may lose Pork chop.
thanks.
I was just going over available options. as short term depth, Henderson wouldn’t be bad but I really don’t see it happening.
I don’t know about Shafering. I think he can play in a 4-3 well. He is a like a poor mans version of mebane imo. He is not as skilled or as big, but is solidly built, a hard worker, and has decent quickness and pass rush skills. Plus both play the run pretty well.
Huff has been solid. He still has a lot of potential but has not harnessed all of it. He is still a quality starter with upside at FS and I think a guy like Jauron who specializes in D-Backs, and if we bring Jerome henderson back who worked with Haden/Ward, he may develop.
We may lose porkchop, partially because we just may not want to resign him because of age. If he can take a 2 year contract at about 1 million a year, I think he stays honestly. He is a holmgren guy who is quality depth on the right side. But we definitely need a replacement as a starter.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
QB Hasselbeck . . . um NO THANKS. Just don’t want to open that pandora’s box.
Wide Receivers listed ? I thought we already have enough # 2 wide outs on the roster now. I would rather see what the new staff / system can do with what we have now. Maybe with a 2nd to 4th round draft pick in the draft to replace Stuckey or who is already buried in the roster
The Offensive Tackles listed ? Maybe we should stock up on QB’s in the draft so we can carry 4 or 5 on the roster . Sounds like we might need them !
Who among our #2 wideouts has the experience of mark clayton or the speed of amendola or Breaston? Both amendola and Breaston have good deep speed, though they are not used deep all that often. I hate to say it but our biggest deep threat may be Watson/moore at TE. Clayton would also be an upgrade in terms of deep speed. One main reason our passing sucked last year was b/c our WRs got jammed at the line and were challenged to go deep, but none could. All guys mentioned are at least as good as our #2 WRs as it stands if you disregard all players abilities as deep threats. I also like amendola because he is electric as a returner and who knows at this point what we have in Cribbs.
Hasselbeck as a backup doesn’t seem like that bad of an option. He performed better last year than Delhomme or Wallace without a significantly better supporting cast. He has injury problems but so does Delhomme.
Really? Stock up on QBs? thats a bit ridiculous. If we sign a guy like Locklear who is a good pass blocking RT, we won’t need 4-5 QBs. We would have one of the better sets of pass blocking Tackles in the league.
And Washington or Sproles do not fully rely on the O-Line because they can make guys miss in the open field.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
haha. well he WAS athlete of the year. Lets let him keep returning kicks regardless of how effective he is; because he is josh freakin cribbs.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
You must have missed the part where he broke all his freaking toes. If he can fully recover from that, and get back to focusing solely on kick returns, he’ll be fine.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
hopefully. He did break his toes halfway through the season. I don’t know exactly what was wrong the first half.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
The only thing that seems plausible to me is a switch in focus to the WR position without the skillset to actually succeed there (WR).
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
when he was kicked to, he was pretty average.
I am not saying that he sucks or that he needs to be replaced. I think he will likely bounce back. However it doesn’t hurt to have a backup plan. Amendola is a solid WR and a good safety net just in case Cribbs doesn’t turn it around.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
yeah. he is good enough to be a starter just for his WR skills. Plus, he would be our fastest WR.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
We are so desperate for talent and depth, I say sign anyone (good) willing to come here.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Yeah, at this point the list of positions that aren’t of need is a whole lot shorter.
Your friendly neighborhood Mangini apologist.
by North Coast Flea on Feb 13, 2011 1:03 AM EST up reply actions
We had good starting field position a lot due to kicking away from him.
by HenryDawg on Feb 16, 2011 12:50 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
He was doing poor on kick returns before he broke his toes, and it wasn’t just because people were kicking away from him. He wasn’t breaking tackles and he looked really slow.
Also, bross’s comment still makes sense, even accounting for broken toes. Why in the world was he allowed to continue returning kicks when it was obvious to everyone he sucked at it?
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2011 6:25 PM EST up reply actions
Why in the world was he allowed to continue returning kicks when it was obvious to everyone he sucked at it?
My guess is that they wanted him to bounce back to pre-2010 Josh Cribbs.
I’m not trying to say he didn’t suck, my stance since like week 3 or 4 was that I thought he started devoting all his effort, focus, mentality, into wide receiver, however you want to describe it.
This is just a guess, I suppose it’s possible he just miraculously lost all his ability. Or maybe it’s the effort thing some guy was harping on last season. Which of these seems the most likely?
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
But after he injured his toes, was there any reason to believe he would be useful? Why let him continue playing when he was hurt like that?
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2011 9:50 AM EST up reply actions
This I’ll agree with.
In X We Trust!
by RelapsingDawgCatcher on Feb 13, 2011 11:12 AM EST up reply actions
This was the year where they tried to make him lose all that weight, right?
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
For some reason I thought he was adding weight this offseason, but I could have it backwards.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 14, 2011 12:10 AM EST up reply actions
I am pretty sure I predicted that was a bad idea.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
Washington or Sproles would be interesting if we fix the O-Line.
So do you think Peyton Hillis trade value has peeked ? Will his production fall off in the new offense ? Will he get hurt early in the season , never to be the same ? Would you trade him now ? Who would want him , what could you get ?
I could definitely see Mebane being signed. I also wouldn’t mind throwing some money at Johnson.
I wonder how many new names we’ll need to know for next year’s starting roster.
I also wonder if somebody like Matt Roth makes the final roster if we sign enough depth in FA.
I think Roth makes this team no matter who they sign, the bigger problem will be signing him first. He was a tad disgruntled that they didn’t pay him last year.
I thought you all learned your lesson about EAS Myoplex Quarterbacks?
Yes, that is Kyle Kuric
by TheRealSlimShady on Feb 13, 2011 1:33 PM EST reply actions
nice post! I would also include Daryll Tapp, Victor Abiamiri, Paris Lenon, Barry Cofield, and even Plaxico,Im curious to see if one of our own like Kaluka Maiava can step up at lolb or even mlb for us.
I HATE THE STEELERS
Cofield has no connection to the front office (which was the point of this post), Plaxico is 34, Lenon and Tapp are still under contract, and Abiamiri hasn’t played since 2009. I don’t see any as very likely FA options. Cofield is the most likely though.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Maiava would most likely play WLB in a 4-3.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
You think so? I could see him in that position.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 15, 2011 5:14 PM EST up reply actions
I think he would see the most snaps on a Coltsish, athleticism-over-physicality type team. Unfortunately, I think we are going to run something like that.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
I don’t mind athletic LBs, as long as we use them to blitz in more of a Jim Johnson scheme. considering the Playing time he got at USC (mostly a rotational guy), he put up a good # of Sacks and TFLs (12 TFLs and 2 sacks). He only had 1 less TFL than maualuga and Cushing (though they were significantly better in sacks, but that also may depend more than TFLs on situation). I think he can excel blitzing in that scheme, though he would be better if he put on 5+ pounds.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Early Doucet is a guy that would be a great fit in the slot he would be alot cheaper than Breaston, I also like Greg Lewis just cus he has the veteran presence we dont have at wideout
I HATE THE STEELERS
Early Doucet is actually a free agent, but he is a restricted free agent. There is no way I think the Cards let him walk. Signing greg lewis would be like the signing of Bobby Engram or David Patten, both of which went nowhere. To put it this way, robiskie had more receptions and yards this year than Greg lewis has the last 2 years. Lewis, even when they were desperate for WR threats in minny, was a non-factor.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
I don’t know about Professor X, but the answer is Notre Dame.
by discoinferno083 on Feb 14, 2011 8:10 PM EST reply actions
My (semi-realistic) wish-list consists of:
Danny Amendola
-speedy receiver
-didn’t show much on practice squads until given chance by the rams, played well
Steve Breaston
-had 1000 yards as the third receiver behind boldin and fitzgerald the year the cardinals still had kurt warner
-I feel like he has the ability to be a #1 receiver, #2 at worst
Ray Edwards
-been playing in Jared Allen’s shadow but I think he could excel (possibly him and Da’quan Bowers as starting DEs??? wishful thinking I know)
James Anderson
-we’re going to need athleticism and coverage abilities at the LB position
-Good Weak-side linebackers are hard to come by
Allen isn’t even a prolific DE, so if he’s playing in his shadow, that doesn’t bond too well for him.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 15, 2011 5:35 PM EST up reply actions
Jared Allen is one of the best DEs in football.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 16, 2011 8:35 AM EST up reply actions
meh, overrated.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
Thank you!
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 24, 2011 9:04 AM EST up reply actions
I like that wish list. That is very similar to mine. I also add Spencer and mebane. the browns definitely need DT help and help at RT. Even though mebane only got 1 sack last year, I remember reading on PFF that he got a lot of QB pressures and collapsed the pocket well. I can’t find current #s, but back around thanksgiving they calculated pass rush productivity on a per-snap basis. Their formula is sacks+(hits+pressures*.75). Another fun fact is that benard was 5th on that list sandwiched between clay matthews and Woodley
Another Heckert guy I forgot about was Akeem jordan. He is a solid young WLB who is good when he gets a shot.
Reading more stuff on Pro Football Focus, I REALLY want Edwards. He was their 7th rated 4-3 DE. Plus, they also rate James anderson fairly high and both are high risers.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
So Bob Sanders is available…do we dare try? Pretty good still when he’s healthy and he can help TJ grow.
"Call Kenny Loggins, cuz you're in the Danger Zone!!!"
like I pointed out in the fanspost, Bob Sanders is not a FS. Sanders when healthy, is your classic SS. The problem is, so is Ward. We don’t need Sanders as a backup, we have a more reliable backup in Elam who is much more likely to be healthy.
I don’t generally like to say “oh, he is a Strong Safety” or “Oh, he is a free safety, he can’t play the run”. There are many players who can play either Safety position. Troy Polamalu can and all 3 free agents I listed can play either (thought they all are naturally Free Safeties). Bob Sanders is not that guy imo.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Lets assume he is healthy.
How good would are deep coverage be? I don’t see either one being that stellar back there in coverage. They could play together, its certainly not ideal imo. If we can’t sign any free safety out there and don’t take on in the first couple rounds, Sanders is much more ideal in coverage (if healthy) than a 3rd rounder (or later) or Elam.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by 























































