Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

Official NFL Draft Thread (Part I)

I said I would do this a couple of weeks ago, so this post is long overdue. As the draft approaches, we will have a series of open threads for general discussion on the NFL Draft. This will help so there aren't a million threads about the same draft-related topic, and it should also stimulate discussion for the draft that you might not feel is worthy of its own FanPost.

Star-divide

For now, I will set the comment threshold at 300 comments. Comments will not be closed when this amount is reached, but rather another draft thread will be created for more current discussion. The topics you can discuss can be related to the Cleveland Browns or any other NFL team as it pertains to the draft. Feel free to get the discussion going!

This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.

Comment 133 comments  |  9 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Offense or Defense the draft is always fun

I think the Browns have no choice in drafting a DL/LB , with the number 6 pick,after the release of the guys last week. It would be interesting to see though if AJ Green comes down to the #6 spot. I think Shurmur and Holmgren’s offensive mind set would scoop him up with the quickness.

by usarmyjon13f on Feb 17, 2011 7:02 PM EST reply actions  

you have to wonder….in our FO, who has the intial say when it comes to drafting, and who can override/has final say?

by discoinferno083 on Feb 17, 2011 7:04 PM EST reply actions  

I’m thinking Heckert does most of the work, Holmgren just OKs the picks. And Shurmer keeps trying to climb onto a chair to see what Papa Walrus and Uncle Tommy are working on.

"Quote goes here."

by Adrock2099 on Feb 17, 2011 7:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I’m thinking the same. I do not believe that Holmgren makes every single decision in the FO, as ESPN seems to believe and give no credit to Mangini or Heckert for last years draft.

by usarmyjon13f on Feb 17, 2011 7:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Correct. Holmgren does not make every decision because he has already predetermined most of them through his divine plan that transcends all mere mortals’ understanding.

ESPN is just playing the percentages like they always seem to do lately. What else is new?

Remember our motto.

In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is. -- Yogi Berra

by JustPlainBrowns on Feb 17, 2011 10:49 PM EST up reply actions  

cool. it will be interesting to see the struggle/balance between Def and offensive needs.

by discoinferno083 on Feb 17, 2011 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Our D always seems to be at least adequate, but our Offense is always terrible. I say AJ Green, if not, then D-Line.

by macdowellm03 on Feb 17, 2011 7:27 PM EST reply actions  

2007.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion.

by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 17, 2011 10:35 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

If hes still available in the 2nd Titus Young from Boise is perfect for new offense (desean jackson mold)

by booobs33 on Feb 17, 2011 7:33 PM EST reply actions  

there do seem to be a few good WR’s available in Rd 2. The guy from Pitt, maybe one from Troy…

by discoinferno083 on Feb 17, 2011 8:50 PM EST up reply actions  

jonathan baldwin. I would rather have him for his size.

by macdowellm03 on Feb 18, 2011 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I also believe Young would be a good pick if we end up going defense with our first pick. He has the speed, route running, and hands of Desean Jackson. Remember Heckert drafted Jackson while he was with the Eagles

by nurse13 on Feb 17, 2011 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

let’s not get too nuts. jackson’s like top-3 fastest guys in the nfl … young isn’t quite there yet.

by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 18, 2011 1:41 AM EST up reply actions  

true we haven’t seen his 40 time yet but the consensus opinion is that he’ll be one of the fastest WRs coming out this year… which also fits what Heckert has done in past drafts with philly.

by Brocolis154033 on Feb 18, 2011 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

I’d like Titus in the 2nd as well.

by Roger Dorn on Feb 26, 2011 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I believe if AJ Green is there we must take him. He has the potential to be a pro bowl receiver with all of his intangibles. However if he is not there we must go defense. I believe if Green is gone and Peterson is there, we can not pass up on Peterson because of his freakish athletic abilities (also would give us an elite secondary with Haden, Ward, Peterson, Brown). Rumors have us looking at Marcus Stroud so that could fill DT for a couple years so DE is my next choice if the Green and Peterson are gone.

by nurse13 on Feb 17, 2011 8:57 PM EST reply actions  

I’d be okay with this.

by discoinferno083 on Feb 17, 2011 9:27 PM EST up reply actions  

We also have to keep in mind the reality that our division is not as pass-heavy as others…so the secondary would help….but not neccesarily be essential.

we need a complete defense, either way.

by discoinferno083 on Feb 17, 2011 9:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Having lockdown players at every position in the secondary (assuming Brown starts seeing time at safety) would help out the front seven by allowing us to man-up on recievers and stack more in the box.

by Clevsports on Feb 22, 2011 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

all of his intangibles

Like what?

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 18, 2011 8:59 AM EST up reply actions  

I’ll soon be posting a profile on him – let me see what I can come up with on the “intangibles” front (the good and/or bad…).

Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. -- Vince Lombardi

by burntorangeandbrown on Feb 18, 2011 9:05 AM EST up reply actions  

do you want me to wait and let you post the intangibles, or shall I list some that I know about him, have read about him, and seen in him?

by nurse13 on Feb 18, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Go for it!
I just thought I’d mention that I’ll be posting a ‘draft profile’ on him soon.

Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. -- Vince Lombardi

by burntorangeandbrown on Feb 18, 2011 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

AJ Green possesses elite route running skills, excellent hands, great size at 6’4, and he can jump up to get any ball. He is not blazing fast but his route running skills and ability to separate make up for the speed. He runs a 4.4-4.5 40. We will get official at combine. Draft analysts are comparing him to Calvin Johnson type receiver.

by nurse13 on Feb 18, 2011 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

those things all seem pretty tangible to me.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 18, 2011 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

like DN said, those are all tangible skills. “intangibles” would be something like his work ethic, locker room presence, etc…

Also, that comparison is not a good one. When you are talking about skill sets and body types, he is not Calvin Johnson. Calvin Johnson has the speed of a track star in the body of a Tight End. The comparison I have heard more is Randy moss. When you are talking skill-set, he is a poor man’s moss. He is a little thinner, a little slower, and a little less athletic than moss was. However, his game is closer to moss and his body type is too.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Feb 18, 2011 9:17 PM EST up reply actions  

That was not my comparison, I was going by what the ESPN analysts are saying in his draft profile.

by nurse13 on Feb 19, 2011 10:50 AM EST up reply actions  

ok. fair enough.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Feb 19, 2011 11:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Here is a good source to see all of Green’s tangibles and intangibles if you have espn insider. If not I can post all of the information so you guys can see. http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft/player/_/id/26072/aj-green

by nurse13 on Feb 19, 2011 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

I am sorry for the confusion. They say he was an above average student, and well respected by both teammates and coaches.

by nurse13 on Feb 19, 2011 11:02 AM EST up reply actions  

There’s a Youtube clip somewhere out there where his coach says that he barely ever drops a pass in practice. He also said that Green has a hunger and determination in him to be successful. That speaks well of his hands and his work ethic. He doesn’t slack in practice or lose focus. I think that’s important, especially when you look at a very good receiver like Brandon Marshall who will probably never be great because he doesn’t have that sort of work ethic or focus.

by Legoman0721 on Feb 20, 2011 1:23 AM EST up reply actions  

We also have to keep in mind the reality that our division is pass rush – heavy . . . so the drafting of Nate Solder for right tackle would help . . . but not neccesarily be essential . . . . unless you want to build the best offensive line in football.
we need a complete offense , either way.

by jaybird6798 on Feb 17, 2011 11:29 PM EST reply actions  

I wouldn’t at all say our division is Pass rush-heavy at this point. Its really only pittsburgh. Baltimore and cincinnati both had fairly anemic rushing offenses; both ranking in the bottom 6 in sack rate (which is sacks as a total of pass plays; adjusting to the offensive playcalling). Baltimore really only had 2 effective Pass Rushers; Suggs (who will line up generally across from Joe thomas) and Ngata who isn’t an edge rusher. Their Strong Side OLBs were awful blitzing this year. the bengals also have nothing outside of Dunlap. Neither team makes me think we need a bookend RT.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Feb 18, 2011 12:11 AM EST up reply actions  

I’d really be OK with a bookend RT (we’re going to have to go through Pittsburgh to get to the Super Bowl ;) ), but I don’t know anything about this Solder guy… I would definitely NOT be OK with a bookend RT at #6, though.

by shep615 on Feb 19, 2011 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

No question. Bookend RT is definitely something that we could use. We could address it in the mid rounds, or through free agency. However, using the teams in our division as examples of why its a huge need and why we should draft solder really doesn’t work.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Feb 20, 2011 12:01 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know that I would say it’s a reason that we should draft Solder- I would just say the other teams in our division give us really good reasons to get a RT somewhere. I don’t think it’s any secret that when you play the Browns, if you want to get to the QB then you blitz St. Clair on the right side. St. Clair isn’t with the team anymore, but I don’t see someone like Pashos being the type of guy that will leave defensive coordinators scratching their heads wondering “How are we ever going to get to the quarterback?” Especially not the Steelers or Ravens, who if I understand correctly blitz a lot.

by shep615 on Mar 2, 2011 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I mean, no matter what division we played in, St. Clair was going to get targeted and destroyed.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Mar 2, 2011 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

if you could have any player in the draft at 6, who would it be?

by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 18, 2011 1:45 AM EST reply actions  

If Green is there, take him, otherwise take Fairley or Bowers, whichever is still there at #6 (if either).

Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. -- Vince Lombardi

by burntorangeandbrown on Feb 18, 2011 8:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Bowers.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 18, 2011 9:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Not a one year wonder with a bum knee.

In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is. -- Yogi Berra

by JustPlainBrowns on Feb 18, 2011 11:11 AM EST up reply actions  

where did he play college ball?

by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 18, 2011 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Green or Peterson.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion.

by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 18, 2011 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually scratch that — you said “any player” so I’ll take Aaron Rodgers.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion.

by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 18, 2011 1:00 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

i said, “any player in the draft”. you lose.

by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 18, 2011 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Cameron Jordan.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Mike Holmgren, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on Feb 18, 2011 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

The Gut has spoken.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 19, 2011 10:02 AM EST up reply actions  

AJ Green… need an elite receiver to help Mccoy develop

by nurse13 on Feb 18, 2011 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

AJ Green

Moisture is the essence of wetness.

by troy145 on Feb 25, 2011 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

more Green

In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is. -- Yogi Berra

by JustPlainBrowns on Feb 28, 2011 9:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Peterson or Bowers for me.

by Roger Dorn on Feb 26, 2011 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Peterson

Your friendly neighborhood Mangini apologist.

by North Coast Flea on Feb 27, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Bowers. I think there’s a couple speedy WRs I’d like in the 2nd.

by StuckInPa on Feb 27, 2011 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Well I should say in the 2nd or later. I’d love to draft one of the burners I’ve heard mentioned here. Possibly find a gem in the 3rd or 4th round. I wonder when that Salas kid is supposed to go.

by StuckInPa on Feb 27, 2011 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

If he is there AJ Green, if not Bowers or Fairley if they are available, if not then Patrick Peterson has probably fallen and he should get some consideration.

by PaduaDSP on Feb 18, 2011 9:44 AM EST reply actions  

my offseason wishlist if a FA is around:
1) Acquire RT Ryan Harris from DEN for a 4th RD DC with a conditional pick in 2012: That side of the OL is now set
2) Best available DL with the 1st RD pick. I liked Dareus until he i found out he was a 1 year starter & i think one of the NC guys are also
3) the WR from pitt with the 2nd RD DC
4) best available LB with the 3rd RD DC
5) the nebraska kicker to replace dawson with the 5th

by sleepy042 on Feb 18, 2011 11:23 AM EST reply actions  

made sense to me

www.chicagobrownsbackers.com/home.htm

by Jim Brown on Feb 19, 2011 3:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe we can trade Delholmme for Harris. They need somebody to be their third QB since Quinn will be out of the league next year.

by Clevsports on Feb 22, 2011 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

We can’t trade Jake until Colt finds someone else to carpool to practice.

In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is. -- Yogi Berra

by JustPlainBrowns on Feb 22, 2011 9:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Especially if there’s a lockout and Colt doesn’t get paid yet for his 2nd year and has to sell his pickup. He’s probably tapped out after using his 1st year’s salary paying off his parents house, the new truck for his uncle, the wedding expenses (and the 5 carat diamond).

Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. -- Vince Lombardi

by burntorangeandbrown on Feb 23, 2011 8:30 AM EST up reply actions  

I like this sequence; solve RT through FA; DE in the first, WR in the second.

My first feeling was we should go back to DL (DT) in the third though, depends a little on whether we do go for Stroud & also how Tuba (and maybe Schaefering) look as 4-3 DTs.

But then I’m a sentimental guy and I’d love to have one of the mathews clan back at LB.

Talking of the Mathews clan I didn’t see Clay II’s brother Bruce mentioned anywhere. As I recall he was one of the better OTs of his day (at Houson, next to Munchak?) and went to a few probowls. So there’s definitely some football genes in there.

This Space available for Rent!!!

by LondonBrown on Feb 23, 2011 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

went to a few probowls

bruce is in the hall of fame

by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 23, 2011 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Just my Britishness coming out. Joe Thomas is quite good too.

;-)

This Space available for Rent!!!

by LondonBrown on Feb 23, 2011 1:43 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Dareus,Quinn,Amakumara are realistic picks but i really hope Peterson falls to us that would be a steal

I HATE THE STEELERS

by Greg Peters on Feb 18, 2011 7:44 PM EST reply actions  

i hope that we get a good defense lineman, and continue to bolster the defense side of the ball, i think/hope that the offense side will continue to improve around our more than decent offensive line and our young quarterback and hardestry and hillis, but that is just a thought.

www.chicagobrownsbackers.com/home.htm

by Jim Brown on Feb 18, 2011 11:16 PM EST reply actions  

also, i have read this blog for a better part of two years, just decided to sign up and start commenting, woot chicago browns fans!

www.chicagobrownsbackers.com/home.htm

by Jim Brown on Feb 18, 2011 11:17 PM EST reply actions  

what about trading down? I hear speculation that NE might be interested in moving up with their two first rounders. I don’t know if I believe that, but if that option was on the table would you take their two picks (I think 17 and 28) for 6?

I probably would. Hope julio falls to us and then also take pouncey or another G/T at the end of the first.

by THEbrownsfan on Feb 19, 2011 9:05 AM EST reply actions  

I would probably ask for a lower round pick too. Assuming there will be a rookie cap next year, the value of the top ten picks goes way up.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 19, 2011 10:04 AM EST up reply actions  

That is surprising. I always associate NE with moving down.

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 20, 2011 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

The really well run teams always seem to do that, but once in a while they home in on someone they want to build around like a guided missile.

This Space available for Rent!!!

by LondonBrown on Feb 23, 2011 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

but who would it be this year?

just doesn’t seem terribly realistic, particularly since they can get some capable guys with their two first rounders.

by discoinferno083 on Feb 23, 2011 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I would have A.J. Green first on my big board. If he’s there, grab him. If he’s not, I wouldn’t be upset about trading down, taking Julio Jones, and stocking another pick or two to use later. I think Green is a can’t-miss prospect. I haven’t seen anything major that I don’t like about him.

by Legoman0721 on Feb 20, 2011 1:20 AM EST reply actions  

Rec the main post to keep it on the front page.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Feb 20, 2011 6:19 PM EST reply actions  

If a new CBA isn’t worked out before the draft, then free agency is completely up in the air. Based on this, I have to believe that draft strategies will have to change somewhat.
Teams will have to focus more on need than “best player available”. By far, the biggest need for the Browns is the D Line. That has to be the focus at #6.

by BROWNSLIFTLOMBARDI on Feb 21, 2011 7:03 AM EST reply actions  

Here’s something I’ve been wondering about. Suppose (god-forbid) the CBA doesn’t get worked out and there’s no football this year. Does the drafting order for next year (2012) remain the same as that of the 2011 draft?

by Clevsports on Feb 22, 2011 1:35 PM EST reply actions  

and 2013, 2014…?

In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is. -- Yogi Berra

by JustPlainBrowns on Feb 22, 2011 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

i’ve been asking this too.

no one really has an answer.

by discoinferno083 on Feb 23, 2011 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

w/o a cba i don’t think there is a 2012 draft

by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 23, 2011 2:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Correct, but what happens if the reach an agreement sometime next winter or even in March or early April? My guess is at that point the procedure for the draft would be outlined in the new CBA.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 23, 2011 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought that might be the case, but I’m not entirely sure on that either as the upcoming draft will take place after the current cba expires.

by Clevsports on Feb 28, 2011 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

don banks has the browns taking marcel dareus in his latest mock draft on cnnsi.

interesting, as peterson, prince, and quinn are all still on the board (but aj and bowers are gone). i was very surprised to see vonn miller go in the top-5, but i may not know anything.

by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 23, 2011 2:24 PM EST reply actions  

I don’t want Prince.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 23, 2011 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert

by Simmsinns on Feb 23, 2011 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I would take The Artist Formerly Known As

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 23, 2011 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

But that cat can ball.

Your friendly neighborhood Mangini apologist.

by North Coast Flea on Feb 28, 2011 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

I keep hearing miller may go top 5.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Feb 23, 2011 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d be happy with Dareus

Moisture is the essence of wetness.

by troy145 on Feb 25, 2011 7:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I like Dareus a lot, would be ok with that but would prefer a DE over DT.

by Roger Dorn on Feb 26, 2011 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

On Da’Quan Bowers, something that really stands out to me on tape is that the guy doesn’t get off the ball well. He doesn’t have an explosive first step that you seen in an Orakpo or Suggs. He is really slow off the ball.

I have always been in the Quinn>Bowers camp, and it only gets stronger watching tape. I think Bowers will be good against the run, but I don’t think he is a 10 sack a year guy. I can’t understand why people think he is the next Peppers.

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 27, 2011 8:08 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I agree, I think Quinn is quicker than Bowers. The biggest concern I would have about drafting him is character issues. I’m not sure he’d play at his full potential for anything other than a big-market team. If we do draft him, I guess I’ll just have to trust in Holmgren’s assessment of the kids character.

by Clevsports on Feb 28, 2011 10:24 AM EST up reply actions  

I put he was quick off the ball in my scouting report. Oops.

by emily522 on Feb 28, 2011 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s just my opinion. I’m no Mel Kiper.

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 28, 2011 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s a good thing.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 1, 2011 10:21 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Also, the Browns met with USC’s Tackle Tyron Smith. I still believe that he makes it into the top 10, hopefully not with us though.

John Clay lost 30-40 pounds to get to 230. No way in hell is he a NFL RB.

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 27, 2011 9:42 PM EST reply actions  

definitely. smith had a great combine whereas clay was awful. the guy lost weight and still struggled to run a 4.8 40. He was also slow to get going which makes you truly question how much acceleration he has. He also looked bad in drills, not cutting well.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Mar 1, 2011 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm just going to leave this right here...

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 1, 2011 10:24 AM EST reply actions  

is this the guy from UMU w/ the great name?

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 1, 2011 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Indeed. Our receivers have great names. Pierre Garcon and Cecil Shorts III.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 1, 2011 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I know it’s been discussed elsewhere, but it really does sound like Carson Palmer is dead set on not playing for Cincinatti. Apparently, he has said that “he’ll never set foot in Paul Brown stadium again.” If this is the case, then does A.J. Green make sense for them? Our D-line will likely be pretty bad next season, but I don’t know that I would be happy with passing on Green at 6.

"There is a small, but important difference between peeing in the pool and peeing into the pool." - Demitri Martin

by Browns town on Mar 1, 2011 5:00 PM EST reply actions  

I hope and pray that Mike Brown sticks it up Carson’s ass.

Go retire Carson.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 1, 2011 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Likewise. Never thought much of Carson myself.

"There is a small, but important difference between peeing in the pool and peeing into the pool." - Demitri Martin

by Browns town on Mar 1, 2011 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I have not heard about this. What did he say?

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Mar 2, 2011 12:02 PM EST up reply actions  

something about Ohio not being able to handle his Swag.

by Villeslgr on Mar 2, 2011 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Is he taking his talents to South Beach?

by StuckInPa on Mar 2, 2011 9:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he’s trying to get back West. Niners? Seahawks? Raiders?

by Villeslgr on Mar 2, 2011 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the Cardinals would be a great fit.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Mar 3, 2011 8:09 AM EST up reply actions  

NFL network kept bringing up this point with the Panthers,Bengals,Bills,Cards,49ers etc.
They were talking about the Panthers and if they are sold on Clausen as the future or do they look at a QB, as well as the Bengals with Palmer crap.
And if the Bills are convinced Fitzpatrick is the guy.

Not to mention the Broncos, and Cards, and 49ers..

I am curious to see if one or 2 ahead of us takes Cam or one of the other qb’s..

This is one of the stranger drafts I have seen. Usually it is pretty locked up on the first few picks. But this one could go any direction…

by Brwnstown on Mar 2, 2011 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Hard to imagine the Panthers are sold on Clausen. I would also think that anything the media is hearing out of Carolina would have to be assumed as pure smoke screen. I’d bet money they take a QB in round 1.

Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. -- Vince Lombardi

by burntorangeandbrown on Mar 2, 2011 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Question: I know there’s Patrick Peterson and Prince Amukamara that are considered top tier CBs, but who are the prospects after them? I haven’t heard of anyone else other than the usual names.

by shep615 on Mar 2, 2011 5:00 PM EST reply actions  

Jimmy Smith. He is big and fast and shows good coverage skills. however, he is a major headcase, has off the field issues, and is extremely arrogant supposedly (you need some arrogance/self-confidence however).

Brandon Harris: Reminds me a bit of haden. Undersized, underrated speed, solidly built with good ball skills.

Aaron Williams: a CB/FS type. Solidly built (6’ 204), decent speed, good ball skills but inconsistent.

Ras I Dowling: very athletic, 4.4 flat speed, good size, a bit inconsistent and has lapses in concentration; good ball skills. The rest of the guys are late 2nd/early 3rd round guys I don’t know much about.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Mar 2, 2011 7:21 PM EST up reply actions  

As much as I like Williams, the dude completely dropped off this year. How could he have 0 interceptions? Instead of improving he disappeared. I’d rather not take that chance.

by StuckInPa on Mar 2, 2011 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree. I really am not a big fan.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Mar 2, 2011 10:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I pass on Jimmy Smith. Two alcohol charges and a positive drug test.

Adding in millions of dollars probably isn’t going to make those kind of issues disappear.

I strongly buy Brandon Harris.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 2, 2011 10:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I am with you. I worry about smith. Plus, he only admitted to one in the interview supposedly. I also remember him having an incredibly asinine comment though I forget what it is.

I like harris too. the guy is a gamer.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Mar 2, 2011 11:04 PM EST up reply actions  

This thread will be falling off the top of the FanPosts soon, so even though we haven’t reached the comment threshold, I’ll be throwing a new draft thread up soon.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Mar 3, 2011 10:57 AM EST reply actions  

As compared to last year, this draft thread sucks.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Mar 3, 2011 11:24 AM EST reply actions  

Just checked last years’ posts and they were posted in December and January. When one was posted in February, it didn’t get a ton of comments either. Must be a sign of some people falling out of the football discussion mood once the season/playoffs are over, which is when this thread was posted.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Mar 3, 2011 6:27 PM EST up reply actions  

NFP mock has julio jones as the first WR off the board, and aj coming to cleveland

by DontCallMeJoey on Mar 3, 2011 3:10 PM EST reply actions  

Gotta love the combine. Had Haden torn it up last year we may not have gotten him. If Julio goes first its only because of his combine performance, because almost nobody had him ahead of Green before.

by StuckInPa on Mar 3, 2011 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Sadly a lot of NFL teams buy into that kind of thing.

by Bernie19Kosar on Mar 3, 2011 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Not so sad if it works out in our favor. I’m not sure at this point whether I’d prefer to see the Browns take Green (if he’s there) or a totally disruptive DL. The arguments for either are pretty good. I’m really hoping that somewhere along the line they can come up with a really good MLB.

I am effing hurdling you and you can't stop me.

by JustBob on Mar 3, 2011 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cleveland_browns_super_bowl_banner_11217big_small
A new USFL/NFL D League?
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / @# / !@
Small
Top 5 Bubble Players
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Buddhathomas_small
Cleveland Browns 2012 Prediction - A Sailor's Perspective
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / !^ / !@
Cribbs_small
2012 Rookie Predictions
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
A look of the 2012 Browns O-line
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / ( / !@
00000021_small
browns Q for 12 who are they

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Hadenward-new2_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

N3tdgy_medium_small Brownie's Year

Polar_cap_of_mars_planet_small notthatnoise