Around the Pound (2/21): Cribbs' Twitter Fiasco, Seneca Wallace Wants an Opportunity
In tonight's edition of Around the Pound, we take a look at the Twitter controversy involving Joshua Cribbs, where Bryan Cox has found new work, what free agent Seneca Wallace has to say about next year and the Browns, a quick update on the NFL PA and the labor meetings, and more.
Joshua Cribbs Makes a Bad PR Move
If you have listened to local talk radio at all day, then I'm sure you have heard about the fiasco involving Joshua Cribbs at the NBA All-Star Game. If you haven't heard, here is the short version of the story:
Dan Gilbert gave his owners tickets to Cribbs to attend the game. Cribbs then tweeted a picture of LeBron James at the All-Star game with the subtitle, "My Boy." Here is the picture.
That's it. Personally, I don't care less about the comment, and I don't agree with so many fans lashing out at Cribbs. With that said, given the fact that Cribbs was in Gilbert's seats and the big "feud" between Gilbert, the Cleveland fans, and James, it probably wasn't the best public relations move for Cribbs to post such a picture.
Bryan Cox Signs on With Miami Dolphins
Former Browns defensive line coach Bryan Cox has been hired by the team he used to play for, the Miami Dolphins. The Dolphins hired Cox under the title, "Pass Rush Coach," where he will work with the defensive line and linebackers. I have never heard of such a title, but it seems to make sense to have a guy who can act as a bridge between both positions.
Seneca Wallace Wants an Opportunity to Start
This falls under the category of, "duh, if you don't have the ambition to start, then why are you in the NFL?" Nonetheless, here is the soundbyte from Seneca Wallace, courtesy of an interview with Pro Football Weekly:
In a recent interview with PFW, Wallace, who's started 18 games in eight NFL seasons, said he wants an "opportunity to lead a team." He said it was "kind of early to tell" whether that opportunity would come with the Browns, but Wallace said he liked the West Coast offense — similar to the scheme in which he played in Seattle — that new head coach Pat Shurmur would be installing. Wallace said that he has not been told who would be the starter in Cleveland. "If I do go back (to Cleveland), hopefully it's a chance to compete for the starting position," he said.
The vibe Wallace has been providing seems to indicate that he is in favor of the new offensive direction Cleveland is headed toward. That still leads me to believe he'll be back with the club in 2011.
Scott Fujita and the CBA Talks
Don't forget that Browns linebacker Scott Fujita, an executive member of the NFL Players Association, will be right in the thick of many of the collective bargaining agreement talks. In the link above, you'll see a picture of Fujita from the AP as he heads toward CBA meetings.
Off-Beat Notes
- I know some of you have expressed some frustration with how the quicker pace of front page posts has made it more difficult to stay up-to-date on posts or has made it less attractive to carry on long conversations. Your concerns have definitely been noted, and your feedback has been passed along. I hope you are able to stick with DBN, because you guys will always make up the heart and soul of the site!
- The warm weather spoiled me last week. Waking up to fallen tree branches due to a thick coating of ice layered on everything was a unique but worrisome sight. I don't mind winter, but I've had enough of it. Bring on some warmer weather and Indians baseball!
- President Barack Obama will be at Cleveland State University's Wolstein Center tomorrow. Plan your commutes accordingly in case the traffic ends up being even more hectic than usual.
237 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Definitely a bad PR move on Cribbs part, being that often talks highly of Cleveland and loves being here, but it’s dumb to give him much flack for it. So he’s a basketball front runner… sadly it happens. It makes him a bad basketball fan, it doesn’t make him a bad person.
A few movie related Off-Beat Notes:
I watched 127 Hours, The Fighter, and The Town recently. All three were good movies, but 127 Hours was great, incredible even. Bale’s performance in The Fighter, as you may have heard, lives up to every bit of the hype. He steals the show every scene he appears in, fantastic performance all around. Franco was great in 127 Hours, but a ton of credit needs to go to Danny Boyle who wrote (screenplay) and directed what is the true story of Aron Ralston. Adventure, Drama, Thriller all in one movie that spends 90 minutes with one guy. Suspenseful even if you know the real story and emotionally riveting as well. Very different from Slumdog Millionaire, but better in my opinion. Having seen True Grit and Black Swan a few weeks back, I can finally round out my top 10 list for last year (they are all good): 1. Inception 2. The Social Network 3. Toy Story 3
4. 127 Hours 5. True Grit 6. The Town 7. The Fighter 8. Kick-Ass 9. Scott Pilgrim vs. The World 10. Black Swan
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Slumdog Millionaire sucked.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 21, 2011 7:57 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
No, it didn’t. Not a favorite of mine by any means, but it was decent. The has little relevance though, I only mentioned it because it too was directed by Danny Boyle.
Actually, I can make it a bit more relevant: Don’t let not liking Slumdog Millionaire keep you from seeing 127 Hours. They are nothing alike.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
It sucked.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 21, 2011 9:30 PM EST up reply actions
I disagree. A movie that sucked is Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Somewhere in the 2-3 range out of 10). A movie that is decent, and even worth seeing once is Slumdog Millionaire (I’d say a solid 6 out of 10).
Just for a little perspective, none of the movies above are below an 8.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
None of the Transformers movies sucked at all. At all. As a transformers buff, I can tell you right now, I saw nothing wrong with that movie. I don’t understand the hate for it at all. Is it because of the story? If so, blame the writers from THE FRICKEN’ 80’S. 2-3 is ridiculous. If you’re trolling, I will personally find you and smack you.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 21, 2011 10:20 PM EST up reply actions
I’m not trolling, I was just citing a much better example of a movie that sucked. I’d give the first one a 5.5 which is very watchable, probably more-so with some alcohol involved, but watchable nonetheless. Where does that leave the much much worse sequel? A think a 3 is on the high-end of reasonable.
The awful dialog made already sub-par actors even worse. It was chock full of annoying clichés and bad jokes. The action scenes consisted of bunch of CGI metal smashing every which way. Granted, it was this way for the first one, it seemed a lot more bearable the first time.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
I’m sorry he couldn’t make Transformers more enjoyable for you. THE WHOLE DAMN PREMISE IS TO HAVE ROBOTS FIGHTING EACH OTHER. HOLY CRAP. Granted, more story would’ve been ideal, which he has fixed in #3 but it was not a terrible movie to say the least. The fact he had the balls to kill off Optimus should’ve made it a good enough movie anyways. I thought the story was fairly solid and I thought the dialogue was fine. Mudflap and Skids shouldn’t have been so stereotypical but I thought the hangover jokes they made were hilarious. The way he presented Jetfire was odd. The farting thing was dumb and then he all of a sudden becomes respectable, huh? I never liked Shia in general, but I think his acting is decent, if not average. Overall, it wasn’t the God Damned greatest movie created, and I’m not advocating it was but on a scale of 1-10, it is far higher than a 2-3 and was not a terrible movie. He just made this movie without too much background and it may seem to not be good unless you already knew the characters and premise. Which I did.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 21, 2011 11:13 PM EST up reply actions
they all stunk … shia l. is a size douche and terrible actor, and michael bay has become completely unbearable
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 22, 2011 2:14 AM EST up reply actions
Meh, you’re just a casual fan who doesn’t understand the fandom that is Transofrmers. But I agree that Shia has never been anything special.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 6:31 AM EST up reply actions
I got your back on Transformers SB
"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden
Oh yah, let’s do this.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 9:45 AM EST up reply actions
Sorry, but futuristic large machines beating the hell out of each other is awsome for me. I’ve always been a fan and always will be. Matter of fact I was checking out the trailer to the third movie coming out later this year. Looks bad ass.
"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden
Exactly. I just don’t understand the hate. If you can’t love Optimus shooting Megatron through his face with his own gun, I can’t help you.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 10:28 AM EST up reply actions
I’ve always been a fan and always will be.
That’s the spirit! Keep loving these movies no matter how bad Michael Bay makes this shit.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
You just do not get it.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 12:24 PM EST up reply actions
Its ok simmsinns, we can’t all have good taste in movies. We need a few of you that dislike good movies to keep everything balanced. :)
"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden
But Revenge of the Fallen isn’t a good movie. Come to think of it, I’ve never seen a good movie I disliked.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden
by Kimble_79 on Feb 22, 2011 3:51 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Oh Kimble…
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 3:58 PM EST up reply actions
I like when Simmsinns tries to be the end – all for every movie ever created. It’s funny.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 1:28 PM EST up reply actions
No, I’m only the be-all and end-all for my own opinion about movies. I just happen to be stating my opinion in a conversion about a particular film.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
No, most of the time you try to act like the guy who knows everything about everything in movies and you’re the guy who tries to crush opinions of people’s favorite movies in one fell swoop. You act like the know -it -all and it’s hilarious.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 1:36 PM EST up reply actions
I can’t help your own perception, but I’ve stated several times (in other movie related threads, even music threads) that’s about an individual’s opinion.
I even mentioned this yesterday,
When discussing with people that have a wide variety of tastes, I think a simpler "Great, Good, Bad, Awful" are better for making suggestions on movies.
Sorry, but RotF is awful.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
I’m a huge transformers G1 buff and ROTF simply stunk. If you want something decent go down to a comic book store & find the IDW comics series. very well drawn & with a plot that would embarrass bayformers 2 writers.
Once again, ROTF is based on the story created by G1 writers. ROTF writers just tweaked it to work in more modern times. So, yah.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 3:48 PM EST up reply actions
Some things just don’t turn out well on the big screen, even if they were good in their original medium.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
And I’m not disputing that. If you find the comment I write in it, almost all the transformers storyline are stupid and suck. But it’s not the story people go for. It’s the characters.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
I’d have thought it was the brainless action scenes, because the characters are nothing more than typical movie stereotypes.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
No, it’s not. The movies obviously are more for the CGI, the GM cars and the explosions but the show was always for the characters and awesome transformations. Especially when it grabbed you as a kid
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 4:11 PM EST up reply actions
I was just referring to the Bay movies. I loved “Beast Wars” as kid more than any other show at that age.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
If I missed Beast Wars, I cried. Best. Transformers. Generation. Ever.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 4:20 PM EST up reply actions
I actually re-watched the whole series about 2-3 years ago.
It was not nearly as epic as I had remembered for so long, but it was still light-years beyond any kids show from the past 15 years. Let’s keep this in context we’re talking about a ’96 animated kids cartoon, but it had dynamic characters, suspense, drama, humor, and cool action… for a kids show.
The series actually managed to do a lot of good things better than RofF.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
i got my 4 year old into watching the G1 series. good times until he started rooting thru my old TF toys. i finally got to watch the final season of the G1 show on dvd (hooray for netflix) and it was……weird with the daniel/arcee thing
MY BROTHER AND SISTER DESTROYED ALL MY TRANSFORMERS! GAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 4:33 PM EST up reply actions
Yep, same. I still loved it. Graphics were definitely worse than I remember, but it was still so awesome. Same thing when I went back to watch Zoids again basically. But I freaking loved Primal and Cheetor. I actually have a transforming Cheetor Flashdrive. And I also have the huge 1ft.+ tall cheetor transformer from the next installment of Beast Wars. Suckier but still pretty good.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 4:33 PM EST up reply actions
yeah its not as impressive especially on the new TV’s. Now i’ll give ROTF some credit for some of action scenes: ravage on the island, prime bringing the smack in the forest & bumblebee vs ravage but overall the movie was a solid D
I almost balled when Optimus died but that was such an awesome fight scene. I hate how Jetfire was portrayed as a farting old ass, and the stereotyping with Skids and Mudflap was a little messed up, but the new characters were sweet and the fight scenes were awesome.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 4:43 PM EST up reply actions
The original Beast Wars was the only one I enjoyed… at all. I remember watching the spin offs and thinking “WTF happened?!?”
I was fan of Dinobot and Depthcharge. Dinobot was an excellent example of a dynamic character.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Dinobot was awesome. I also loved it when they started introducing the morphs, like Megatron and Optimus’s changes into three different beings, through various sources. The spliced characters were cool too. I mean, the spinoff back onto Cybertron was kind of stupid, but I couldn’t help it. I could not let Beast Wars go.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 4:45 PM EST up reply actions
didnt leboof (spelling) admit that it got rushed out by the studio after the writers strike cuz they wanted to make up money?
1) CP does a Transformers debate qualify as against the religion topic or is it just geeking out?
2) this is more fun than catching obama calling cleveland state kent state this afternoon…..
Haha, Obama knows what’s up!
And yes, the writer’s strike had an effect bu t the premise is based on original transformer writings.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 4:09 PM EST up reply actions
Transformers in general is awful. And everyone is entitled to their bad opinions (assuming one likes Transformers)
by Roger Dorn on Feb 23, 2011 7:41 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
I recommend this post.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 23, 2011 7:44 PM EST up reply actions
Seriously NTN?
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 24, 2011 6:15 AM EST up reply actions
he was good in movies where he was allowed to actually show himself as an actor (Wallstreet, Disturbia) but is unfortunately known for his lesser movies.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Eagle Eye blew harder.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions
Is that the one where they could see and hear everything he did? It reminded me of that movie with Jamie Foxx, can’t remember what it was called because it wasn’t that good either.
You’re thinking of Stealth.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 23, 2011 10:20 PM EST up reply actions
Eh Stealth still sucked.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 24, 2011 6:15 AM EST up reply actions
it was clearly a remake of rear window.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
because even though anyone who has seen both knows its essentially the same movie, they didn’t want to directly say “oh, this is just Rear Window”. Then, people that are younger wouldn’t just go out and watch rear window. I think they probably figured that even though they had confidence in their own project, that it wouldn’t eclipse such a classic and that making the title the same would not only cause more people to compare it, but for those who saw both to judge it harsher. Just my thoughts on why…
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
I saw Disturbia before Rear Window. Rear Window is obviously way better. I’d say it was a decent remake.
and the horrible-ness of wall street 2 was only outdone by shia’s terrible-ocity in the film.
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 22, 2011 9:33 PM EST up reply actions
The numbers (1-10) are not all that important, definitely not something to harp on. The 1 through 10 scale is better suited on an individual basis. When discussing with people that have a wide variety of tastes, I think a simpler “Great, Good, Bad, Awful” are better for making suggestions on movies.
That said, I’d highly recommend any (& every) movie on that 2010 list in my first comment, if you haven’t seen any particular one of them.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Ah crap. I’m a jackass.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 8:43 PM EST up reply actions
I am a tranformers fan but I found the movies extremely stupid and actually a bit boring.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
The thing with Transformers is, is that almost every story ever created for any transformers line, is pretty dumb. Some are less stupid than others (Unicron, battle on Cybertron) but as a whole, the writers get really stupid with every generation.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 21, 2011 11:16 PM EST up reply actions
I do think the movies were a bit more stupid than the TV show, but you do have a point there. Still, they can jazz it up and make something that had stupid plots have an entertaining plot.
Bridges of madison county was a book I read part of but didn’t like at all, but the movie was solid. Great expectations was also a decent movie even though the book was just flat out awful (and I am not a hater of classics or dickens, that book just sucks)
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Sadly, the movies are really not their own story. They are based off of the original transformer writings. See what I mean? The Fallen was one of the original 9 transformers, and even though Bay used slight modification, he didn’t stray too far. Bay didn’t have much to work with and super transformers buffs would’ve flipped sh*t if he made his own line. So Bay did what he could with what he got and, unless you read up, #2 didn’t really make a whole lot of sense. I will agree to that.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 21, 2011 11:40 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I didn’t delve as deep into transformers to understand 2. I understand wanting to please the purists, but imo its a mistake to do it at the expense at isolating the average viewer. the problem was that most of the people that loved it were the purists and the average viewer found it confusing. I think the overall plot of having the fallen is not that bad, but the whole stuff with egypt etc. was very confusing without the context.
I don’t think the buffs would have flipped a Sh*t if they edited it THAT much. Plus, the average viewer in #s definitely outweighs the transformer buffs. The question then is: do you please the few devoted “buffs” even if it will isolate the casual viewers?
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Oh I went to see 127 hours on the big screen and loved it. I just wanted to make my opinion of Slumdog known.
And you’re right, it didn’t suck. But it should not have even been in consideration for an oscar, let alone winning a bunch.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 21, 2011 9:48 PM EST up reply actions
And you’re right, it didn’t suck. But it should not have even been in consideration for an oscar, let alone winning a bunch.
I’m right with you there. The Dark Knight should have won hands down, without question. However, the Academy voters are a bunch of snobby movie cunts anyhow, so I don’t let their opinions get to me at all.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
I definitely agree with you there. Dark Knight probably should have won…At least should have been nominated over Slumdog. Thankfully Inception got a nom (though I heard it might not), but has a snowballs chance in hell of winning.
Point being: the Academy loves Danny Boyle, but doesn’t seem to “get” Christopher Nolan. they always pick one “oscar type” and snubs him (the queen, Capote, gosford park). Looking back, he did go up against some stiff competition and “the queen” and “capote” were good movies, but he should have definitely gotten an oscar nod. the showing that year was especially weak when you consider moulin Rouge was probably the 3rd best out of the 6 nominations.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Christopher Nolan has never, and likely will never, make a movie half as good as Gosford Park. Very poor example, bross. And besides, Memento wasn’t all that great anyway.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Mike Holmgren, apparently, 'did some good things'.
I completely disagree with that whole comment. Gosford park is not bad, but not amazing. with a lesser cast, it would not have been good at all. memento I thought was brilliant.
Then again, this is all opinion and preferences so no one is truly “right”
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Momento WAS brilliant.
Your friendly neighborhood Mangini apologist.
by North Coast Flea on Feb 22, 2011 12:27 PM EST up reply actions
With a lesser cast, it would still be an Altman movie, and still be one of his best. The excellent cast is icing on the cake, but not at all what makes Gosford Park a great movie.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Mike Holmgren, apparently, 'did some good things'.
I’ve never seen Godsford Park but based on it’s IMDb page, it’s doesn’t look like something I’d be in to. That’s not to say I wouldn’t give it the chance, but I’d have to scratch off a whole lot of movies of my “yet to see” list before I give it the time of day.
But, I can say I like several of Nolan’s movies. I think he’s a great writer and director. Memento was good, Batman Begins was good, The Prestige was great, and The Dark Knight was an absolutely exceptional action movie. Inception was great as well.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
I’ve never seen Godsford Park
You should. Make it a double feature with Renoir’s The Rules of the Game, to which Gosford Park plays homage.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Mike Holmgren, apparently, 'did some good things'.
We watched La Règle du Jeu in french class, and I remember liking it a lot. I don’t remember much more than that, but I at least remember that much.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t know about the Dark Knight. I loved it, don’t get me wrong, but watch is again, and focus on just how cheesy a lot of the dialog is.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 9:22 AM EST up reply actions
I’m of the opinion that Milk should have won that year.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 9:23 AM EST up reply actions
My girlfriend got it for my that folowing Christmas and I have yet to pull the cd from the case. I mean, once you’ve seen it, you’ve seen it yah know? This isn’t one like Inception where you just can’t get enough of it.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 9:31 AM EST up reply actions
Obviously “best picture” for that year on individual level is entirely opinion, but The Dark Knight was hands down the best movie to be released in 2008. Admittedly, I’ve yet to see Milk, but have been meaning to for the past 2 years, never got around to it. I think I’ll enjoy it, but highly doubt I’ll think it’s more enjoyable than TDK.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
You’re right that this is just a difference of opinion. TDK was great. I just don’t think it was particularly deep or moving. Superficially it was, but it didn’t really go into any uncharted territory. Milk was just a more powerful movie IMO.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 11:38 AM EST up reply actions
I’m not sure why it’s getting so much negative sentiment here. I thought it was decent.
If it’s because anyone had any kind of “oscar hype” going in, and the movie didn’t live up to it, than that’s not the movies problem. (I’m not saying that’s your case, DCMJ, just addressing it if it happens to be the case for anyone else.) Purely based on Slumdog’s own merits, that is the film itself, it’s alright. Not great, not “best movie of 2009” but it’s decent.
As far as the Oscars go, The Hurt Locker didn’t deserve it over District 9 either, but no one should give a shit.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
The Hurt Locker didn’t deserve it over District 9
I disagree with this.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 9:23 AM EST up reply actions
I want to see D9, it looks awesome.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 9:31 AM EST up reply actions
I think you’d like it, Even if we disagree on Revenge of the Fallen.
Personally, I think District 9 is an awesome, extremely well executed sci-fi action thriller. It takes the concept of aliens, futuristic weapons/technology, ect. but goes somewhere completely new with it. Almost the perfect sci-fi movie.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
District 9 is the best sci-fi movie to come out in some time.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 11:38 AM EST up reply actions
Right, I can obviously tell it’s different. Instead of the alien species having the upper – hand, it’s the humans! Wicked.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
D9 was an awesome movie but I am totally with you.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
We’re talking about the “best picture” to come out in 2009. The only other real contenders in my opinion are Inglourious Basterds, Up, and Avatar. Two of those I’d hardly even call contenders (Av, Up) but I liked all three. Basterds was great, but I didn’t enjoy it quite as much as District 9. Edge goes to D9 being more of a 8.9/10 and Basterds being about an 8.7/10. I did enjoy The Hurt Locker as well, but I’d say that’s closer to an 8/10.
Every movie mentioned in this comment is good and worth seeing.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
we are talking about the best picture. I give hurt locker a 9 and I would have to agree with D9 as an 8.9. I think that the Hurt Locker was overall a better movie. D9 was a bit more entertaining, but if we are going by that, shouldn’t the A-Team win some awards? I just thought that Hurt locker had more suspense, was crafted better, and overall delves to a deeper level than D9.
“when there’s a bomb under a table, and it explodes, that’s action. When we know the bomb is there, and the people at the table play cards, and it doesn’t explode, that’s suspense”
this is a quote by Alfred Hitchcock describing suspense. He also is inadvertently describing Hurt Locker.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
I loved The Hurt Locker, I’ll agree with what you said about it specifically, but personal preference gives District 9 a (very) slight edge. Both make my personal all-time list (which is like 20+ movies long).
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Yep, its all about personal preference. my personal preference leads to suspense thriller/dramas. Thats probably partially why I also think Shutter Island was almost as good as Inception (or at least I liked it about as much)
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Some ****er ruined Shutter Island for me. It’s a sore subject. I’ve never seen it for that reason, even as a big Scorsese fan.
That kind of shit pisses me off.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Someone on here did it right?
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 4:37 PM EST up reply actions
No, it was at a college class about a year ago. Three of us were talking about movies (we often did, as the instructor also taught film classes) but anyway, f***er said “I knew… *” well I won’t say it here, but I instantly realized the film would be pointless to watch now.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Never read the book. might pick it up. the movie was fantastic so I bet the book will be good…though I hope that its a bit different so that I already don’t know the ending.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
I don’t know how deep it is. It was pretty easy and they couldn’t have made it more obvious. It was about as deep as X-men. It sort of beat you over the head with the message, rather than doing it in a more nuanced fashion.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 9:37 PM EST up reply actions
I thought the first X-Men was decent, wasn’t a fan of the sequel, but none of them are as “deep” as District 9, I think.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
They were clearly all about driving home the anti-mutant sentiment as an allegory for racism angle. Much like District 9 beats you over the head with the apartheid stuff.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 23, 2011 8:54 AM EST up reply actions
I liked it better than avatar. I fell asleep during avatar when they were flying around on the bald eagles.
I didn’t like Avatar at all. It looked really pretty, sure, but it I wanted to look at something pretty I could go to the art museum for free. If I go to a movie I’m looking for an entertaining story, which Avatar was not.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 23, 2011 7:42 PM EST up reply actions
I refuse to see it. It’s f*cking Pocahontas.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 23, 2011 10:21 PM EST up reply actions
The one with the giant spiders impaling everybody? Saw that when I was 6, along with Mars Attacks! Saw to say the closet scared the sh*t outta me.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 24, 2011 6:17 AM EST up reply actions
Inglorious Basterds was one of the worst movies I have ever seen.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 22, 2011 6:21 PM EST up reply actions
Whaaaa?!?!?!
Please explain. You’re completely entitled to your opinion, but I’m very interested as you are the first person I’ve heard say that. I’m honestly very curious, what about it makes it one of the worst movies you’ve ever seen?
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
The ending was one of the most moronic endings to a movie that I have ever witnessed. I think Tarantino is a complete hack (something I have argued to death on this site). The dude puts out crap, and a lot of people, just because he is supposed to be some sort of genius, think it’s fantastic. Just because two people have a 10 minute conversation doesn’t mean it should be on film.
Secondly, if you are going to fabricate a story of maybe the greatest war conflict of our planet, you would think you could come up with something better than that. It was garbage. I think WWII was, and is fascinating to read and study. This a-hole boils it down to that?
Add in classic Tarantino (over the edge violence and rambling coversations) and it makes a God Awful two hours.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 22, 2011 7:32 PM EST up reply actions
Fair enough.
I must have forgotten or missed past conversations on Tarantino. Your opinion seems to be a mostly unique one from my experience, but valid. His style isn’t for everyone.
If it’s been argued to death on DBN, I’m definitely not interested in debating his legitimacy. But for me, the QT dialog (“rambling”) is just very realistic and engaging, and most importantly, entertaining.
I could mention a lot more, about only really loving 3 of him 7 films on their individual merits and it having nothing to due with blind obsession with “genius Tarantino” but it I don’t want to beat the dead horse and what not.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
I like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction had a lot of good parts.
Dude just doesn’t fit my style I guess. My biggest issue with Bastards was the storyline aspect.
Steven Spielberg made Saving Private Ryan from WWII.Tarantino made Bastards. Doesn’t even compare IMO.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 22, 2011 11:23 PM EST up reply actions
at least even though he isn’t your style, you appreciate the artistry of those 2 movies. Outside of those, I am not a huge fan. I love the dialogue in those movies but the others do not live up to that great writing (though I though basterds at times showed good writing)
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
I would say that Basterds is the worst in dialogue out of those 3, but imo thats not saying a ton.
Whatever you or I want to call it, its highly entertaining and works extremely well. even stuff basic like the “royale with cheese” sequence. The setup is its these 2 hitmen/gangsters and here they are talking about what a quarter pounder is called in france.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Have you ever seen Jackie Brown? I think its pretty good – a bit more subtle / subdued for Tarantino and without nearly as much graphic violence as some of his others. Haven’t seen Bastards but I’ve heard some pretty bad reviews. I guess you just have to have a taste for Tarantino’s style.
I really liked Reservoir Dogs – great sound track too.
I also like Pulp Fiction, but I can’t watch it unless my wife is not home – she can’t stand it.
Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. -- Vince Lombardi
by burntorangeandbrown on Feb 23, 2011 8:06 AM EST up reply actions
Reservoir Dogs is one of my favorites.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 23, 2011 8:55 AM EST up reply actions
I do have to say; after watching basterds, I finally realized that Tarantino is really bloody. Pulp fiction was really bloody, so was Resevoir dogs.
I do agree you have to have a taste for tarrantino’s style.
Personally, if we are talking off the beaten path directors, I prefer the Coen Brothers. many of their movies have a very post-modern noir feel to them (such as “no country”). I also like that, outside of a couple scenes of no country, they are very bloodless. They have violence but usually its just implied. Very little blood, no heads blown off, and the deaths and blood do not seem to be glorified as much as in tarantino movies.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
though I forgot to say that the coen brothers movies have similarities to resevoir dogs. Both use a significant use of single camera shooting with adds harshness and realism. Pulp fiction is good, but it does seem to use more multiple camera format.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
s just very realistic and engaging,
I don’t find it realistic, unless you’re surrounded by people trying to imitate a
Tarantino film. I’m always reminded of commercials for Dawson Creek when i see a Tarantino film, a bunch of people talking way more than they should trying to sound smarter or cooler than they really are.
That’s an interesting take on it.
I wouldn’t consider the people I have a lot of casual conversations with as “tying to imitate a Tarantino film” but still see a real similarity in the casual conversations in those films (Reservoir Dogs & Pulp Fiction). In that sense, “very realistic” definitely applies for me.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
I was not a fan of the ending either. I also do agree that for a WWII piece, it is a bit simplistic.
I enjoyed the concept however of jewish soldiers going behind enemy lines and bashing nazi skulls in…just appeals to me. I am a sucker for a movie when vengeance is had on Nazis.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
I haven’t really watched a lot of his films, so I’m not a “Tarantino-homer.” But my opinion on his films spans the scale of fantastic to bad.
Resevoir Dogs – I thought it sucked.
Inglourious Basterds – Pretty good, watched it a couple times.
Pulp Fiction – Incredible, great characters, great storylines, one of my favorite movies.
This is really interesting. Most people that found Pulp Fiction incredible, I would think, also like Reservoir Dogs. They are very different, but also have some significant similarities.
As I mentioned before, I’m not a Tarantino-homer either. The three you mentioned here are the only ones I have on my favorites.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Some people don’t mind watching dialogue only on film. I enjoy Tarantino on my own merits, not because someone convinced me he is a genius.
And that’s fine.
I’m referring to a different brand of “fan”.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 23, 2011 10:13 PM EST up reply actions
This. I’d never put it on any kind of favorites list, but I enjoyed it once. Probably not a movie I’d watch again for a long time.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
I liked Reservoir Dogs.
But, that’s a totally different kind of movie.
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is. -- Yogi Berra
by JustPlainBrowns on Feb 22, 2011 10:26 PM EST up reply actions
Same. Great sound track in that one too.
Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. -- Vince Lombardi
by burntorangeandbrown on Feb 23, 2011 8:06 AM EST up reply actions
but it’s dumb to give him much flack for it. So he’s a basketball front runner
Or maybe he just got to know James while James was in Cleveland? It might to be strange to hear but athletes hang out with each other, and are sometimes even friends with players on opposing teams.
That’s not at all strange to hear, the concept of athletes hanging out.
However, I doubt that’s the case here. I think it’s a lot more likely that Cribbs likes James for the same reasons all the new Heat fans like James. But like I mentioned, I don’t think it’s worth hating Cribbs over.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
I still think we should have held on to Cox. He’ll be a damn fine coordinator in the very near future.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Mike Holmgren, apparently, 'did some good things'.
I’m confident Dick be twice the man Cox was. Golan’s right though, we can’t keep letting the good ones slip away.
Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. -- Vince Lombardi
by burntorangeandbrown on Feb 21, 2011 9:21 PM EST up reply actions
Chris giving a shout out to the Viks’ I see.
My damn city didn’t do crap for the roads tonight. I was definitely the only lowered Honda out tonight. The sound of all that snow hitting my bumper was terrible. Got stuck like four times, glad I’m used to it though. Was the worst drive from work to home ever. Ohio sucks.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
In a recent interview with PFW, Wallace, who’s started 18 games in eight NFL seasons, said he wants an “opportunity to lead a team.” He said it was “kind of early to tell” whether that opportunity would come with the Browns, but Wallace said he liked the West Coast offense — similar to the scheme in which he played in Seattle — that new head coach Pat Shurmur would be installing. Wallace said that he has not been told who would be the starter in Cleveland. “If I do go back (to Cleveland), hopefully it’s a chance to compete for the starting position,” he said.
I don’t want to keep a QB who is this big of an idiot.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
Wallace said that he has not been told who would be the starter in Cleveland.
He said it was "kind of early to tell" whether that opportunity would come with the Browns
It’s quite clear McCoy is the starter. It was announced too. If he thinks he has a chnce of starting over McCoy, he’s an idiot. I mean, he’s already a jackass.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 21, 2011 9:52 PM EST up reply actions
It’s not that he wants a chance to start, it’s that he thinks he’ll get it.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 21, 2011 9:53 PM EST up reply actions
Yep.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 21, 2011 9:56 PM EST up reply actions
Probably hard to hear over all the self-applause in his mind.
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is. -- Yogi Berra
by JustPlainBrowns on Feb 22, 2011 10:27 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t know – seems like it would be hard for a guy like him. So close to getting that one chance to be ‘the guy’, yet so far.
I actually think he might be able to pull it off – seems like he did ok in his starts in 2010 before he was injured. But I guess most of you guys have seen more of him to be able to judge his long term potential. Sounds like from what you guys keep saying he’s too inconsistent with his passing game (?)
Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. -- Vince Lombardi
by burntorangeandbrown on Feb 23, 2011 8:18 AM EST up reply actions
He can’t throw a ball past 20 yards that lands in bounds.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 23, 2011 8:56 AM EST up reply actions
given the fact that Cribbs was in Gilbert’s seats and the big “feud” between Gilbert, the Cleveland fans, and James, it probably wasn’t the best public relations move for Cribbs to post such a picture.
Agree
yeah, it was just plain stupid. no big deal.
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 22, 2011 2:17 AM EST up reply actions
I don’t think I could be more excited for baseball season.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 9:25 AM EST up reply actions
The fact there’s no cap still ruins baseball for me.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 9:31 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I’d love to get into as much as I did when I was around 9, but years and years of seeing great players going to the highest bidders has completely killed it for me. I still like to hear when small market teams stick to the stacked douchebags. And I’d still love to see Cleveland win something.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
yeah, mlb economics destroys the game for me, which really sucks b/c i went to about 200 indians games from 94-97.
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 22, 2011 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
My number is close to 10 games, but most of my earliest sports memories are from Indians games around that time.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
those were my high school summers … not a whole lot else better to do as a 14-17 year old in cleveland than hop on the rapid, try to sneak some beers from shooter’s, and then scalp bleacher seats
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 22, 2011 9:35 PM EST up reply actions
I’ve become very disconnected from major league baseball since 2007, so I have to ask, are we looking like we could be good this year?
Remember this question is coming from someone that hasn’t seen a full baseball game since Game 7 of the ALCS 4 years ago.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
we’re about where the Indians were in 2004 I think. We won’t contend this year unless a large amount of things go our way, but by the end of the year we will know who is for real and who isn’t. Next season is the earliest they will contend probably.
I understand everyone’s frustration with the economics of baseball, and I couldn’t agree more. Still, I just can’t ignore how much I love going to a baseball game on a sunny afternoon. It’s a totally different experience than any other pro sports event.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 11:42 AM EST up reply actions
Baseball games in real – life are so much fun but I will never sit down to watch one on t.v. through enjoyment. Maybe if I go past it and nothing else is on.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 12:26 PM EST up reply actions
This is the best advice I can give to people who find baseball boring. Think of every pitch like a play in football. The entire situation changes after every pitch.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 12:46 PM EST up reply actions
It’s not that I find it boring, far from it. It’s that the economics ruin the game for me and it no longer holds meaning.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 12:49 PM EST up reply actions
right, I didn’t mean to say that you found it boring, I just know that a lot of people do, and that seemed like a convenient place to put that particular advice.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 12:51 PM EST up reply actions
I love baseball. Have season tix to the minor league team here in town.
I loathe MLB.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 22, 2011 2:39 PM EST up reply actions
Yep.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions
Used to go to all the the ball games as a kid at Southern Illinois University (my home town). Small college but they had a great baseball program – made it to the college world series 5 times. Made it to the CWS championship twice – beaten by USC in the championship game both times (’68 and ’71).
Always been a Cubs fan and followed them on and off over the years, but what happened to the Cubs in 2003 just about broke my will once and for all. Game 6 of the ‘03 NLCS probably the most painful game I’ve ever watched (up 3-0 in the 8th and 5 outs away from a World Series berth… and they lost). Most heartbreaking season ever. Haven’t paid much attention to MLB since then.
Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. -- Vince Lombardi
by burntorangeandbrown on Feb 22, 2011 3:48 PM EST up reply actions
Most heartbreaking season ever.
The Cleveland Indians 1997 season would like a word with you.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
I feel your pain brother.
Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. -- Vince Lombardi
by burntorangeandbrown on Feb 22, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions
?
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 23, 2011 7:43 PM EST up reply actions
I will always root for any Cleveland team.
But in a league that favors the teams that just cut checks, it’s not worth my time. Ask a Cardinal fan when Pujols is a Red Sox next year.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 22, 2011 7:02 PM EST up reply actions
The Cards have money. I’d be surprised if Pujols went anywhere.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Mike Holmgren, apparently, 'did some good things'.
they just signed up adrian gonzalez. pujols may not be in stl, but he won’t be in boston, either.
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 22, 2011 9:36 PM EST up reply actions
Ortiz’s contract is up after this season. Same for Papelbon, Drew, and Mike Cameron. That is almost 43 million coming off the books. Pujols and Gonzo can play 1st and DH.
And sending stupid money has never been a problem in Boston.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 22, 2011 11:27 PM EST up reply actions
NY will go after him hard too. I know they have Teixeira, but they are the team that traded for A-rod the shortstop while they had Derek Jeter.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 23, 2011 8:57 AM EST up reply actions
the Sox and Yankees can. the Yankees paid their 1B and DH in 2009 33 million dollars. Granted one was primarily a DH and one was primarily 1B, however Gonzalez rarely DHed in SD. I see this no different as when the yankees acquired Tex.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
That’s not even close to ridiculous money. The Cards will offer him upwards of 280 for ten years. The Yankees and Sox will have to go higher than that.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Mike Holmgren, apparently, 'did some good things'.
He’s not going to be a Card.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 23, 2011 10:22 PM EST up reply actions
Pujols will not be staying in St. Louis. Guaranteed.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 8:45 PM EST up reply actions
Ditto. I’ve watched and listened to a lot of very bad baseball games over the last decade. It’s nice to finally have a contender in Cinci. And to have one while Marty is still kickin’ around in the booth makes it all the better.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Mike Holmgren, apparently, 'did some good things'.
All of my early baseball memories are Reds games, even though everyone in my family is an indians fan. At the time I was living in Cincinnati, and at the end of little league every year we would all get tickets to a Reds game. Games of note include Ron Villone taking a no-hitter into the 9th and watching Dave Burba hit a home run (for the indians).
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 3:50 PM EST up reply actions
Aeros were my first tastes of spring air on a baseball field.
If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.
by SpecialBrownie on Feb 22, 2011 4:00 PM EST up reply actions
Eric Davis walk-off home run in a meaningless game against the Braves in 1989 for me. Also, nearly catching a Johnny Bench pinch hit foul ball versus the Expos in Bench’s final year in the league.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Mike Holmgren, apparently, 'did some good things'.
I’m still bitter about not meeting Bob Feller. My friend tells me they have company for dinner, but to just come over in maybe an hour. When I get over there, his mom goes “oh it’s too bad you weren’t here fifteen minutes ago, you just missed Bob Feller.”
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 5:18 PM EST up reply actions
I met Warren Spahn while shopping for pants at Schottenstein’s in Columbus.
Dawgs by Nature -- where Mike Holmgren, apparently, 'did some good things'.
That’s pretty awesome. I saw Bernie Kosar at Geauga Lake once with his kids, but I didn’t want to be that guy that interrupts while he’s just trying to have a good time.
I also met Campy Russell at Boston Market on Warrensville road by Mayfield once.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 9:39 PM EST up reply actions
i think i’ve mentioned on here before that i once sat in a suite at the jake w/ feller for 2-4 innings in the summer of 1999. it was incredible.
(don’t mean to rub it in, NTN)
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 22, 2011 9:38 PM EST up reply actions
No problem, just pour a little salt in that wound while your at it.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 22, 2011 9:40 PM EST up reply actions

by 

























