Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

2011 NFL Draft: Cleveland Browns Trade Up to Grab OT Jason Pinkston in 5th Round

You thought the Cleveland Browns were finished in the fifth round after drafting CB Buster Skrine? They weren't. The Browns traded both of their sixth-round draft picks (No. 168 and No. 170 overall) to the Minnesota Vikings. With that pick, the Browns drafted OT Jason Pinkston out of Pittsburgh. I think Pinkston was a tremendous value pick for the fifth round, as I originally projected him to go in round 3 or round 4.  He is also teammates with Jabaal Sheard, the defensive end the Browns drafted yesterday in the second round.

While Tom Heckert has stated that Tony Pashos is projected to be their starting right guard, Cleveland was lacking youth on the right side of the offensive line. They don't necessarily have "studs" all of the sudden, but Shawn Lauvao and Pinkston give them some options for the future on the right side of the line. Even if just one of those guys works out to be a starter, it'll be a big "win" for Cleveland. After the jump is a scouting report on Pinkston from Mocking the Draft.

Star-divide

Jason Pinkston
6'4, 305 pounds | Offensive tackle | Pittsburgh

Agility:
Pinkston's is not a very fluid athlete and struggles to remain balanced.  He plays with a high pad level and he bends at the waste rather than at his knees.  These factors lead to a lack of balance and uncoordinated movements.  However, Pinkston shows quick feet especially while in his kick slide.

Movement:
High pad level and uneven weight distribution result in Pinkston being off center.  He is often falling forward and out of control when trying to apply a block.  In pass protection, his feet get to wide hurting his ability to anchor after contact.  His short arms also lead him to lunging forward and loosing his balance.

Star-divide

Pass blocking: Lack of balance and arm length lead to struggles in pass protection for Pinkston.  He tends to raise his pad level and over extends his body in order to reach the pass rusher.  He has quick feet but that is negated by his lack of balance.  Speed and power rushers alike give Pinkston trouble.  The speed guys can get underneath him and turn the corner while the power rushers can get into his body and push him backwards.  Pinkston is more of a puncher than a Velcro blocker.  Overall, Pinkston is going to struggle protecting the passer in the NFL but his quick feet might be his only saving grace.

Quickness:
Pinkston has quick feet and is explosive out of his stance. These two attributes are what gives him a fighting chance in pass protection.  He is able fire off the ball and get into the defender quickly in the running game.

Run blocking: Keeping his feet underneath him and remaining balanced are problem areas for Pinkston.  He has a tendency to lung at his target rather than sitting into his stance and taking solid steps.  Pinkston appears to be compensating for his less than idea arm length.  He lunges to try and get inside hand placement but it often results in missed blocks.  Being off balanced limits the push off the line Pinkston is able to generate. I also question Pinkston football IQ as he appears lost and unable to identify the proper target.  This is most noticeable when Pinkston attempts to make a block in the 2nd level.

Strength:
Pinkston has strength but his lack of balance limits his playing strength.  His natural ability allows him to get some movement on the line but his forward lean limits the potential.  Pinkston has a good power punch and is able to recoil quickly.  However, he is more of a puncher than a Velcro player and his short arms allow defenders to slip past him.

Technique: Lacking a natural bend hinders Pinkston's ability to sink his hips and anchor.  This is compounded by his tendency to play high.  Pinkston's steps are long and uncoordinated which lead to poor balance in both the passing and running game.  While in his kick slide, Pinkston keeps his hands out in front of him with little wasted motion and this allows him to be an effect puncher.

Final word: Pinkston is not a prospect that I see developing into a contributor in the NFL.   He has limited athletic ability and poor overall technique.  These problems are closely related as some poor technique is a result of limited athleticism.  Pinkston's best fit might be as a right tackle but in order to be successful he needs to work on remaining balanced in the running game.  I see Pinkston as a late round tackle prospect.

Comment 74 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

He has the best and worst teachers in Thomas and St. Clair. Listen to Thomas and make fun of St. Clair and he’ll be all right.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Apr 30, 2011 3:14 PM EDT reply actions  

St. Clair was cut…

by Roger Dorn on Apr 30, 2011 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh right. Well, laugh at him in film.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Apr 30, 2011 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

he was? why did i not know?

I have missed out on much rejoicing.

"You are the worst villains in football, your evil plan never ceases."-Mooncamping

by discoinferno083 on Apr 30, 2011 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didn’t know this either.

by emily522 on Apr 30, 2011 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hekert drafted him for his utility. Says he can possibly play LT, but would rather have him at guard and RT.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Apr 30, 2011 3:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Drafted up because they were afraid he was going to get picked.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Apr 30, 2011 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Holmgren says this was Shurmer and Heckert’s draft. Said he was heavy in last year’s and held back on this one. Said our initial trade and ability not to reach was marvelous. Enjoyed this draft more than last years.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Apr 30, 2011 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Holm says we were picking BPA regardless of need. So, if FB was BPA, we took it. Says they’re very happy and excited.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Apr 30, 2011 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Shurmer says we want big, tough guys.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Apr 30, 2011 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol I was doing the same thing on the other thread.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Apr 30, 2011 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was spliting what they were saying between the specific players.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Apr 30, 2011 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you got it, I’ll stop and just listen then.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Apr 30, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nah man it’s all you, I am just sitting and listening.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Apr 30, 2011 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

And eating.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Apr 30, 2011 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

He still looks pretty heavy… Just wasn’t quite as involved in this draft :p

by shep615 on Apr 30, 2011 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pinkston is raw, but he sounds like he could develop into a solid, physical lineman. Maybe better at G.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Apr 30, 2011 3:25 PM EDT reply actions  

I hope so, but I’m not sure I saw a single positive in that scouting report other than that he is strong. I think St. Claire was strong too. Do you have links to any positive info on this guy? I could use a pick-me-up.

I am effing hurdling you and you can't stop me.

by JustBob on Apr 30, 2011 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

That roto thing says he will be a solid pass blocker. Take that for what it’s worth…

by shep615 on Apr 30, 2011 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hear that we his weakness

by The naome40 on Apr 30, 2011 6:43 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I heard this too, not good at the pass but great in the run.

Evil wins again, but Truth prevails where Good fails.

by North Coast Flea on Apr 30, 2011 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

The reports won’t be exceptional, which is why this guy is a 5th rounder. I think a large part of what hampered him were his injuries. He’s big, he seems to have some potential, but any 5th rounder’s chances aren’t good.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Apr 30, 2011 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess that it’s not so much that I was expecting more from a 5th rounder as that I was expecting more from whoever we brought in to play RT. From the sounds of this we might have to sign a FA to have some reasonable depth there.

I am effing hurdling you and you can't stop me.

by JustBob on Apr 30, 2011 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

There should be an upgrade for us in free agency should we want one. I think we can pick a young RT earlier in a draft when the opportunity presents itself and we can use free agents to plug that hole from year to year if we need.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on May 1, 2011 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Atlanta’s pick is a low first rounder next year, perhaps we address it there.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on May 1, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

That would be a great place to get one. Just sit back and wait till someone drops to you. If someone wants to trade 2 2nds for your first, you take it. The end of the first round is easy.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on May 1, 2011 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have heard people say that when he is fully healthy, he has the potential to be a poor man’s ross verba.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Apr 30, 2011 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Holmgren makes terrible jokes.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on Apr 30, 2011 3:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Thats a pretty rough scouting report.

Moisture is the essence of wetness.

by troy145 on Apr 30, 2011 3:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Anyone that can improve our o-line gets an A+ from me.

"Quote goes here."

by Adrock2099 on Apr 30, 2011 4:04 PM EDT reply actions  

this is a better pick then gettin the tight end from usc! DOES ANYONE KNOW WHY WE GOT THE TE???
 i wish we got casey mathews

by Shaffdog on Apr 30, 2011 4:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Holmgren and Heckert really really really liked his upside and basketball background. They think he can come in and do some serious damage.

"Quote goes here."

by Adrock2099 on Apr 30, 2011 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Year 1 is development.

by Roger Dorn on Apr 30, 2011 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Three te’s is not a bad idea, especially in our situation. Moore will more than likely split out most of the time. Cameron will probably also split and stretch out the defense. With our receiving core, these te’s will give Mccoy a big solid target and comfort…hopefully

by The naome40 on Apr 30, 2011 6:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I agree, Moore is productive split out wide and I see Cameron in this same role being more a mid range WR than a true TE.

I think they are seeing a Gonzalez/Gates prospect in Cameron which would be pretty sweet and Colt definitely favors these big targets as most shorter QBs do.

by HenryDawg on Apr 30, 2011 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly what i see. I am just fine with very athletic tight ends being our strong receivers. Kinda disappointing but what are you gonna do. Moore creates nightmarish matchup problems no matter who is covering him. That sideline catch on Revis was very impressive. I believe the skill set with tight ends nowadays is turning into the ideas of Gates, Keller, and Clark

by The naome40 on Apr 30, 2011 10:12 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Goal line formation generally has 3 tight ends.

Evil wins again, but Truth prevails where Good fails.

by North Coast Flea on Apr 30, 2011 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tight Ends don’t HAVE to line up next to the Lineman. They can line up in the slot too or have him play the H-Back role. He is agile for his size.

We didn’t aways line up moore (or winslow) as a TE. sometimes we split them out wide.

They want to add weapons for mccoy and there are a lot of things you can do with Jordan Cameron once he refines his route running some.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Apr 30, 2011 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please calm down with the caps lock and the multiple punctuation.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Apr 30, 2011 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Casey Mathews was available in the 4th???? We should have snapped him up there.

This Space available for Rent!!!

by LondonBrown on Apr 30, 2011 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

This draft was reminiscent of a Phil Savage draft for me. Apologize for the negativity – just weird how we give up a blue chip pick early and then chuck away half the picks later by giving way over the value chart. Now – I don’t care about the value chart – but I just don’t get it. If you want Pinkston – you can’t pick him at the end of the 4th instead of a FB?

Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen

by realmccoy on Apr 30, 2011 5:35 PM EDT reply actions  

The only pick we gave up that bothers me is the 3rd rounder. Don’t mind losing 6ths and 7ths.

by Roger Dorn on Apr 30, 2011 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

And also, if Phil were running the show, we would be without our 1st next year, not plus an extra 1st.

by Roger Dorn on Apr 30, 2011 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Honestly I feel like we should throw the “value chart” completely out the window.

Moisture is the essence of wetness.

by troy145 on Apr 30, 2011 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

In our case it does demonstrate how good our trade with the Falcons was: the chart overrates the top 10 picks and we still beat the chart.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Apr 30, 2011 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Apr 30, 2011 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I pay no attention to value points. It’s garbage IMO.

My dog is a badass. His name is Kosar.

by Brownie's Year on Apr 30, 2011 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

maybe fullback was a bigger need on their board.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Apr 30, 2011 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

…just weird how we give up a blue chip pick early and then chuck away half the picks later by giving way over the value chart

This is exactly my problem with this draft. I thought the whole point of getting more picks was to maximize the chance that you pick a sleeper. If you give them away later on guys that are low in the draft for a lot of compelling reasons, what is the point of trading to get them in the first place? Having more picks just gives you more of a chance of finding that diamond in the ruff. I thought the idea in later rounds was to sort of ignore needs in favor of taking the best on the board AT YOUR PICK. So this perplexes me but I don’t do this full time and don’t have any experience compared to Heckert. Just an observation that I hope the Browns’ front office will prove wrong.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on May 1, 2011 1:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with you here. I don’t mind trading back up in the first, because at that point you’re still targeting specific players. I am more upset with trading up in the fifth round. Those guys are down there for good reason, can there possibly be someone there who is worth giving up multiple picks?

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on May 1, 2011 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s my opinion that you move around more in round 5 and later, because the talent is so thin and you should be targeting specific players who you think have value that late. It’s okay to trade up for a guy you like or to find a stop-gap at a position of need. First four rounds, I think you stay put and let the players come to you, and look to take advantage of any team that has fallen in love with a player. There’s enough talent in the first four rounds that if a guy you like doesn’t fall to you, there’s still plenty of starters and potential starters to choose from.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Mike Holmgren, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by golanbatrac on May 1, 2011 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d lean this way also.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on May 1, 2011 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep, Heckert weighed the guys who were on the board against what he thought he could get later, and he thought one guy now had a better chance than two guys later.

And we’re still netting above 7 picks per year, so it isn’t like we are sacrificing the size of our net—we can still cast a wide one. When you trade your whole draft for Ricky WIlliams I can see people being worried about the scarcity of picks, but we still have plenty.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on May 1, 2011 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep, this is my line of thinking as well.

If you haven't watched Inception, do it now. Right now.

by SpecialBrownie on May 1, 2011 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Given the vagaries of NFL careers, the use of ‘value chart’ to judge drafts is useful for discussion purposes only. Greg Little could be a bust or he could be Hines Ward. Who knows at this time?

That said, I gotta tell you, I love the fact that there are people other than me who want to argue about the quality of fifth round picks. We are sick dawgs.

by JamesPowell on Apr 30, 2011 6:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Hines Ward sucks

Moisture is the essence of wetness.

by troy145 on Apr 30, 2011 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

still

In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is. -- Yogi Berra

by JustPlainBrowns on Apr 30, 2011 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Granted, he’s a Steeler so, you know, and granted he’s is the consensus dirtiest player in the NFL. But I was referring to not a first rounder, not an impressive time in the 40, nevertheless stellar numbers. I have no idea what people said about Ward when he was drafted in the third round, or what the value chart said about him. I doubt it said 11,000+ yards and Super Bowl MVP.

by JamesPowell on Apr 30, 2011 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sick.

WOOf! WOOf!

by MWP333 on May 1, 2011 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not that he´s bad, but still no linebacker?

by mooncamping on May 1, 2011 5:39 AM EDT reply actions  

I just discovered an little known site. Plagierism.org

From MockingTheDraft my ass. This is a scouting report from CBSsports.com/NFLDraftscout.com.

WOOf! WOOf!

by MWP333 on May 1, 2011 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can you link the original one?

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on May 1, 2011 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure. Here you go:
href=“http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1115001” >

WOOf! WOOf!

by MWP333 on May 1, 2011 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Apparently I dont know how to link it but, there it is. lol

WOOf! WOOf!

by MWP333 on May 1, 2011 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe I’m missing something, but those don’t look the same to me.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on May 2, 2011 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

The analysis portion is was copied and pasted by J.Dove to the MTD thread. If you cant see that, then you dont want to.

WOOf! WOOf!

by MWP333 on May 2, 2011 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oops. Here it is.

WOOf! WOOf!

by MWP333 on May 1, 2011 7:34 PM EDT reply actions  

This sounds so much better than the analysis in this article. I’m starting to feel more like this guy could work out.

I am effing hurdling you and you can't stop me.

by JustBob on May 1, 2011 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good. Check the sites analysis of our other picks. Maybe they’ll sell you on them too.

WOOf! WOOf!

by MWP333 on May 1, 2011 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cleveland_browns_super_bowl_banner_11217big_small
A new USFL/NFL D League?
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / @# / !@
Small
Top 5 Bubble Players
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Buddhathomas_small
Cleveland Browns 2012 Prediction - A Sailor's Perspective
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / !^ / !@
Cribbs_small
2012 Rookie Predictions
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
A look of the 2012 Browns O-line
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / ( / !@
00000021_small
browns Q for 12 who are they

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Hadenward-new2_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

N3tdgy_medium_small Brownie's Year

Polar_cap_of_mars_planet_small notthatnoise