Cleveland Browns Free Agent Review: S Abram Elam
We are currently in process of doing brief reviews of all of the free agents on the Cleveland Browns. As we approach the end of the list of free agents, this one might be the toughest one to decide on.
S Abram Elam
How and When He Joined the Browns: Do you ever think of undrafted safeties becoming starters at that position in the NFL? In 2006, Elam was signed as an undrafted free agent by the Cowboys. Over the next two years, he was a part-time starter for the New York Jets under Eric Mangini, and was generally thought of as a player with potential to be a solid starter. When Mangini came to Cleveland in 2009, he pulled off a draft day trade with the Jets in the first round. One of the pieces that Mangini got was Elam, and the move seemed to make sense because Cleveland was lacking a starting safety at the time.
Productivity Level Last Season: It was a contract year coming up for Elam, and in his first season with the team, I hadn't really seen anything special from him. I was always looking for that "impact play" that would help change the outcome of the game, but it was never there in 2009. Things started the same way in 2010 for Elam -- solid at times, but nothing that ever really stood out.
Then, in Week 7 against the New Orleans Saints, something seemed to click in Elam. Either that, or he just started being in the right place at the right time by chance. Against the Saints, he defended three passes. The next game against New England, he forced a fumble. Two weeks later, he defended two passes, had an interception, and forced a fumble. Two weeks after that, he had another interception. This might seem like a normal stretch for a safety like Ed Reed, but this is Abram Elam we're talking about here -- a player who defended two passes, had no interceptions, and forced one fumble in 16 starts in 2009.
Why Keeping Him Could Make Sense: We didn't draft a safety who can take Elam's spot, and the rest of the secondary is returning. With less preparation time, it could definitely make sense to retain Elam so that the defensive backs are on the same page and ready to roll in Dick Jauron's system. His playmaking ability last year could be an indication that he finally started to "get it" and is ready to continue stepping his game up.
What the Browns Should Do: This is a tough one. It'd be nice to settle for Elam as a one-year fallback option if the Browns can't score an elite free agent safety, but I don't think a one-year deal would fly with Elam. Is he good enough to bring back for multiple years? Even with his hot stretch last year, I think we can do better at the position. I'm hoping that Holmgren and Heckert are aggressive in getting a free agent safety right off the bat. I think the vote in the poll will be interesting. We've talked about signing a free agent safety, but have not really focused much on whether keeping Elam is an option or not.
Now it's your turn -- vote in the poll below on whether or not the team should try to re-sign Abram Elam!
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You accidentally used the numbered list shortcut I imagine.
(If all the nachos are stuck together, it only counts as one nacho.)
by North Coast Flea on Jul 24, 2011 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Close but I say No. He’s much more of a SS than FS and Ward has the role locked down for the next decade (Please).
Under Mangini & co I would have said keep him, but with Heckert around I reckon we could find an equal replacement at 5am in Trafalgar Square.
In Holmgren I trust but I think Heckert is showing real awesome.
This Space available for Rent!!!
I voted no because he’s more of a SS and we need a FS. Give him a chance to start on another team so he doesn’t have to be Ward’s backup.
(If all the nachos are stuck together, it only counts as one nacho.)
by North Coast Flea on Jul 24, 2011 1:12 PM EDT reply actions
why not keep him as a 3rd safety? I really don’t want a rookie Eric Hagg or Piscitelli in that role.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
that’s what i was thinking too, but i doubt that would happen. he’s going to either demand more money we’re willing to give him or he wants to be promised a starters position.
Yvan Eht Nioj.
by Brownsbacker488 on Jul 24, 2011 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Donte Whitner makes a lot of sense.
by HenryDawg on Jul 24, 2011 1:50 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Haden, Brown, Ward, Whitner = WOW
My dog is a badass. His name is Kosar.
by Brownie's Year on Jul 24, 2011 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions
No one here talks about him so I forget he’s out there. I’d take Weddle over Whitner. He’s all over the field and good ST player. SD would be stupid to let him go. Fans love him here.
My dog is a badass. His name is Kosar.
by Brownie's Year on Jul 25, 2011 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions
i voted yes, but like most of you have stated, i agree we should only resign him if we can’t find a better FA option. i don’t think Elam could really demand a whole lot of money though. he’s just an average player at safety.
Yvan Eht Nioj.
by Brownsbacker488 on Jul 24, 2011 2:56 PM EDT reply actions
I am surprised that a greater # are in favor of keeping titus brown than are of Elam. Elam makes more of an impact on the field and can be a spot starter. I am not sure where Titus Brown fits in a 4-3 (if he is an NFL rotational LB). Its not worth it if Elam demands a lot, but he is one of the better guys who would be a backup/3rd safety.
And whitner? He is a Strong Safety who has had troubles in coverage and will likely demand more than elam. why not resign elam?
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Maybe I’m wrong, but the way I see it, it’s easier to dedicate money to a guy like Brown, who might be on a year-by-year minimum salary basis, than to Elam, who you’d have to tie money to for multiple years.
Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.
by Chris Pokorny on Jul 24, 2011 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Convicted of participating in gang rape. I’ll pass.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
That none of the actual alleged rapists were convicted of. Smells fishy to me.
(If all the nachos are stuck together, it only counts as one nacho.)
by North Coast Flea on Jul 25, 2011 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I said keep him because he is still serviceable and at this point we don’t have a replacement. As far as his 2009 numbers versus his 2010 numbers, I recall that our 2009 pass rush was anemic – so QBs had more time to pick targets and WRs had more time to get open.
So disregard comparing the stats for those two years and you have a guy who was undrafted and has only put up one good season and isn’t in a position to demand big money. Add in a 90-man roster for camp and currently no replacement – that to me says resign him with escalators in his contract and cut him if a good FS comes along.
"... you slay the chicken and you crack the egg ..." - Moon

by 




















