The 2010 St Louis Rams Offense: Passing Game
For part one of the series, click here.
There are no two ways about it: the Rams threw the ball quite a bit last year despite playing a rookie QB and having less than ideal receivers on the outside. Their passing game involved several different passing concepts and I am willing to bet that Pat Shurmur didn't install everything in year 1 with Sam Bradford.
Most of the Rams' pass plays utilized short to intermediate routes along with 3- and 5-step drops. You'll notice a lot of motion, "bunch" formations and formations with receivers tight to the formation. One reason that St. Louis utilized these formations often was because of their reliance on the shallow crossing route.
Shallow Cross
Despite displaying variety, one mainstay of the Ram's attack was a series of plays revolving around the shallow crossing route.

Drive
You might recognize the "drive" play because Brian Daboll and Eric Mangini used it quite often last year. It involves a shallow cross combined with an in route behind it:
Here, the Rams run this concept against the Raiders:
Note here the one receiver pushing (literally) vertical, one receiver widening to the flat, and one headed inside for the shallow:
Unfortunately for the Rams, the pressure got to Bradford here and the pass was tipped. But you can see Amendola breaking in over top of the shallow cross:
This is basically a "hi/low" or two-man vertical stretch off of one player. LB comes up to cover the shallow, throw it over him to the in. LB drops back to cover the in, hit the shallow. Many, many, many teams run this play.
The problem with the Drive concept is that it is extremely easy to pattern match if every time you send one receiver to the flat, one vertical, and one on a shallow cross you are running the same play. The defense can jump the routes and/or distribute zone defenders to take away all the options.
The key to Shurmur's system and the reason it was effective in 2010 was that he ran other plays off of the same route stems. For Shurmer, this can become any number of things:
Mesh
Mesh is another play with these route stems that adds a second shallow cross. The shallow crosses create a great "rub" against man coverage, and depending on what you run with the vertical stem, you can create a horizontal stretch underneath against zone.
Above, you can see Amendola motioning tighter to the formation to run his crossing route. Below, two WRs are headed on crossing routes while one pushes vertical and the back flares to the flat:
This is why details win; Amendola and/or Brandon Gibson mess up and don't know which one is supposed to go underneath and which over the top. The vertical route to the bottom of the screen did it's job of occupying CB Deangelo Hall, and there is space for Gibson to catch, run, and get the first down.
Instead, the WRs run in to one another, Bradford has to double-clutch, and the pass is complete, but short:
Jerk
Here, the concept is Mesh again, only with one receiver running a "jerk" route (named because it typically makes a defender look "like a jerk") which is essentially a shallow cross with a stutter step. The receiver will act like he is going to settle down or run a stick route, and then continue on the shallow cross.

CB Marcus Trufant has a good angle to get to WR Mark Clayton on the shallow cross and stop him short of the first down. Clayton hesitates:
Trufant gets rubbed:
Clayton makes the catch:
And Trufant looks like a jerk:
For a great example of the Jerk route, check out this video. You can also note the similarity between Mike Shannahan's version of the WCO and Shurmur's (bunch formations, crossing routes, etc.).
Stick
To further problematize coverage against the shallow cross route stem, the Rams often had a WR run a "stick" route as a part of the Snag concept. To run a stick route, the receiver would head in, then either sit in the hole in zone, or break down and pivot away in man:
![]() |
|
| Vs Zone |
|
![]() |
|
| Vs Man |
(note: WR Greg Little got a first down with this route in our preseason game vs the Packers)
On the offense's left, there is one receiver vertical, one to the flat, one on the shallow cross:
Amendola pulls up:
Illustrating that he isn't afraid to "throw open" a WR, Amendola looks covered but Bradford throws the ball where he knows Amendola will be, away from the leverage of the defender:
The ball is incomplete, but draws a defensive pass interference flag:
Scat
The Rams would also run two stick routes out of the same look as "Mesh" in a concept known as "Scat":

Note how this play develops the same as Mesh, with two shallow cross stems:
Complete, first down, and an offsides call to boot:
Slightly OT:
QB Phillip Rivers () may have invented this play at NC State:
"We ran it to open a game (vs UNC), to shut him up, and show him his play doesn't work.... We ran it, ran it again, then kept running it to show him it wasn't a good idea.... same formation, same play.....9 times in a row...9/9 and on the 9th throw it was a TD."
Constraint Plays
With those five versions of the cross (shallow, mesh, stick, scat, and jerk) run out of the shallow cross stem, Shurmur can keep defenses on their heels. And just when the defense thinks they have answers for everything, Shurmur uses this same look to develop a constraint play.
Above, you'll notice Bradford converting a 3rd down with the Jerk route in the Mesh concept. That conversion was the 11th play of the game for the Rams, and undoubtedly a part of Shurmur's script. Earlier, I wrote about how Bill Walsh began this practice in order to control what he shows the defense and set them up for big plays later.
(Can you see where this is going?)
Later in the game vs. the Detroit Lions, the Rams faced another 3rd and long. They motioned a receiver closer to the formation and sent two on shallow cross stems. To the right, you will again see one on the shallow stem, one vertical, and one into the flat. This is the same look as Mesh, the play that burned Detroit for a key first down earlier in the game.

You can clearly see LB Lofa Tatupu (#51) bracing for contact as he attempts to reroute the shallow cross:
Only this time, It isn't Mesh. TE Daniel Fells bails out of his shallow cross and continues up the field, leaving Tatupu off balance and sucking him away from the play.

I'll switch angles here to point out how much space 3rd down back Kenneth Darby has in front of him:
That's a lot of space.
20 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
do you freakin coach foosball or somethin? jeez man.
Smile big, hug bigger. Talk big, act bigger. Stop judging do something, shut the fck up do something.
Many here have said he should.
cautiously realistic
by North Coast Flea on Aug 19, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
The Brown’s size, combined with their lack of speed should fit this concept nicely. Awesome breakdown and analysis Rufio, can’t wait to see some AFC rivals look like jerks.
Go Browns
Sheldon has a lot of speed, actually. Unless you’re talking bout Jarrett?
Pittsburgh is just jealous. We got Cudi and they have Wiz.
by SpecialBrownie on Aug 19, 2011 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Hi, visiting Rams fan here
This breakdown is absolutely excellent, respect given.
The issue with these routes, is that while they are excellent on paper, and often work, without the personnel those shallow routes can be closed down by 8 in a box.
It meant that the defense didn’t have to think about much because the concepts were all a bit similar.
Sometimes it worked a treat, and other times it failed.
This offense is all about execution, and if the execution isn’t at a high level, then the scheme will fail.
Also watch out for the classic Shurmer 1st down run up the gut, second down mesh or drag route, third down screen, fourth down punt cycle.
If his concepts and play design are great, his playcalling with regards to situation can leave a lot to be desired.
Colt looked good the other day though, this system is perfect for his skillset.
http://brotherspork.wordpress.com/
Maybe the play calling had something to do with a rookie qb?
by athensdawg on Aug 19, 2011 4:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
this may be a dumb question, but whats the difference between a drag and a shallow cross?
"It is unlikely that anyone has ever read Nietzsche or Derrida and has been inspired to open a soup kitchen"
IIRC, a Drag is even closer to the LOS and it’s immediate from your break. A quick line across the field. The shallow cross seems to be a little deeper and may take more time to develop.
Pittsburgh is just jealous. We got Cudi and they have Wiz.
by SpecialBrownie on Aug 19, 2011 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah, true, that makes sense. I never played in high school, just pop warner and now a lot of 7v7 flag stuff ever since i was in college. I’ve tried to study smartfootball.com and rufio’s playbook and just books i can find and stuff and apply as much as I can in to our own play design for 7v7 and plus it just really enhances my enjoyment of the game to know more about it.
"It is unlikely that anyone has ever read Nietzsche or Derrida and has been inspired to open a soup kitchen"
Not a dumb question at all. Mostly, the difference is coaching terminology. I’ve heard/read “Drag” to mean a number of different things; from being synonymous to a shallow cross in Madden/NCAA to a shallow square “In” route, even maybe a concept between two guys….“Drag” seems to be a word people apply differently in different systems.
A shallow cross is always a shallow cross. WR runs inside, aiming to run with through the DL’s feet (where they are pre-snap). This may involve a little bit of vertical action at first, it may not. He doesn’t really break, but bends inside off of any vertical action to begin the route (1-2 steps at most) and runs hard to cross the formation. He is looking to catch the ball past the Center on the other side of the formation. He should catch going full speed going mostly horizontal but drifting upfield to about 3-5 yards as he reaches the opposite OT.
A lot of announcers confuse the shallow cross with quick slant routes, often chastising the WR for not running a sharp route or not making a sharp break, but that isn’t what the shallow is about.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
We use the Cleveland offense: We pass on the opportunity to run sometimes.
by mooncamping on Aug 20, 2011 7:06 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
(Bumped to top to make sure this didn’t get buried too soon)
Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.
Rufio, slightly OT. I heard a reference today to receivers running ‘9’ routes. Assuming that I heard it correctly, to what does that refer?
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
That would be a “go” route, going deep straight down the field.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by 



























































