Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Breaking Down Cedric Benson's Soul-Crushing 4th Quarter Run


I believe this is what they call a "dagger."

Down three points late in the fourth quarter, the Cleveland Browns had to stop the Cincinnati Bengals from converting a 3rd and 3 and running out the clock. Cincinnati stacked the box, leaving only one WR on the field in favor of "22" (2 backs, 2 tight ends) personnel. Cleveland countered by bringing an 8th man (Joe Haden) into the box, but 8 weren't enough.

DE Jayme Mitchell, who was lined up at LDE crashed down the line as RB Cedric Benson ran around him outside for a touchdown. When I watched this play live, I was furious at the undisciplined play and youthful mistakes of Mitchell and our line. Ready for five (four?) words you won't hear very often from me?

I was flat-out wrong.

Star-divide

After reviewing the play, I believe the mistake was a structural one, not one made by any individual Brown.

The Bengals lined both TEs up on the offense's right side, with the backs in an I formation. The Browns countered with their normal 4-3 personnel, in what appeared to be an adjusted 4-3 Over front (DL in same alignment as 4-3 Over, LBs are not). The Browns were in a single-high coverage, run blitzing WLB Chris Gocong at the snap:

01_medium

The Bengals were running the Power play, a simple running play that every pro team uses. It involves pulling the backside OG while the rest of the line blocks down, and a Fullback leads:

02_medium

The 4-3 is predicated on each defender controlling a gap between linemen to stop the run. You need one player for each gap that the offense presents to you.

As you can see from this endzone angle, the Browns have all the gaps on the line of scrimmage covered. From (viewer's) left to right, you'll see DE Jabaal Sheard with C gap responsibility, Gocong blitzing through the B gap, and Athyba Rubin with weakside A gap responsibility.

Next to them, DT Phil Taylor stunts into the strong-side A gap. I am unsure if this was supposed to happen or if it was the result of Cincy running that way all game and Phil looking to make a play. In any event, D'Qwell Jackson is able to flow over the top of him to get in the B gap to that side (these arrows show a "switch").

Next in line is Jayme Mitchell. You can see that he is lined up in a 6 technique (directly over the TE) and he has the strong side C gap. LB Scott Fujita is over the outside TE and he has D gap responsibility. Joe Haden is the only person left to be the contain player:

03_medium

As it was presented, we had all the gaps covered. But there was one problem: the Fullback. While Joe Haden had a great game, we can't expect him to stack a fullback and make a play on either side of him. Because Cincinnati's FB was able to kick Haden out, they created an extra gap:

04_medium

The only person that is anywhere close to being able to fill that gap is safety TJ Ward.

05_medium

The only problem with this was that it was TJ's responsibility to play the deep middle 1/3 of the field in pass coverage, putting his pass responsibility directly in conflict with this run-stopping duty:

06_medium

Further confusing to me was the alignment of FS Usama Young. Because Sheard already had the outside gap responsibility on that side of the formation, I don't know what Young was defending out there.

07_medium

An easy adjustment might have been to screw Ward down into the box to help with the run while Young took the deep 1/3. This would leave Sheard responsible for stringing any run to the Bengals' left out wide, and allowing defensive pursuit to catch up.

08_medium

 

You can see right off the snap that Rubin and Gocong are left defending the same gap as the Guard (#62) pulls. You can see Sheard furthest left on the line, then LT Andrew Whitworth, then both Rubin and Gocong. Further right, Andre Smith (#71) is able to get immediately up to the second level, leaving a lot of space in his wake.

10_medium

Because of Taylor's stunt and Smith's immediate release to the second level, that C gap got awfully big. There is a lot of space in there that Mitchell was responsible for. He worked hard to shut his gap down, with Fujita following suit. This is what I mistook for over-aggressive play.

11_medium

 

Above, the C Gap quickly closes because of Mitchell and Fujita, but more space opens up outside. Obviously it would be better for Fujita to stay on his feet there, but even if he is able to he'd have to cover two gaps and still be able to tackle Benson within 3 yards of the line to make this play. As I said earlier, we simply don't have the numbers at the point of attack to be able to properly defend this play. The run is going through a gap that is unaccounted for.

12_medium

Here, you can see Sheard (with the help of Gocong's run blitz) able to hold his edge, while Young is out wide and not really able to provide support against this run. Unless we are worried about Gradcowski running a naked bootleg here, I don't know what we were doing.

13_medium

...and that's a huge hole.

 

14_medium

Benson is off to the races, and we all know how it ends. I'll spare you having to look at him in the endzone again.

I see no individual defensive player as being at fault here (though it is possible that someone completely blew their assignment). Rather, I see this as another example of our lack of team coordination and cohesiveness: our defense was simply structurally unsound against the run.

Comment 44 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Awesome post. Expecting to see many of these for Browns daggers awfully soon. I assume this is the moment when just thousands of Browns fans watching the game/attending left the game/quit watching.

by johnf34 on Sep 12, 2011 5:48 PM EDT reply actions  

i never quit watching.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Sep 12, 2011 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

DQ’s stunt doesn’t make sense to me. I just don’t see a need for Taylor to run a stunt into the strong A. This makes me think Taylor was doing whatever the hell he felt like and DQ had to account for him taking his gap. Essentially, if he took DQ’s gap, Taylor created a giant clusterf*ck that DQ couldn’t get out of and it caused Mitchell and Fujita to have to close down a huge C gap, but allow for the strong side to blow wide open.

Pittsburgh is just jealous. We got Cudi and they have Wiz.

by SpecialBrownie on Sep 12, 2011 6:29 PM EDT reply actions  

i think i agree with you. i know less about the specific x’s and o’s than you guys do, but it sounds like taylor freestyled his way into an open C gap there. i have to believe jauron isn’t a big enough moron to design a formation this way … i have to believe that.

by DontCallMeJoey on Sep 12, 2011 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am not seeing this as impossible.

But still, look at the formation. Pre-snap we have five (!) defenders already on their left of center. Four right of center—including our CB—where they already have two TEs.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Sep 12, 2011 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

the defensive alignment compared to the offensive one seemed a little off. Like you said, why put Usama that close to the line? I know they were running left all day, but if he ran outside left, Sheard had a chance and if he didn’t at leas Usama would be in deep coverage and could come down to make the play.

It seems like they only had 4 players whose assignments were left of center (TJ Ward’s coverage seems to take him at least to where the Center was lined up, if not more so left) while the Offense had 2 TEs on the right side.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Sep 13, 2011 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

That didn’t make sense to me either.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Sep 13, 2011 2:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

it seems like then it was possibly a bad on-field call by the D or something that Jauron screwed up there. They should have at the worst adjusted to compensate for the double TE formation

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Sep 13, 2011 4:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m with SB – why run a stunt when you can just plug the gap right in front of you?

by HenryDawg on Sep 12, 2011 6:32 PM EDT reply actions  

I mean I can understand doing stunts in a passing attempt and such to ruin blocking assignments and break a defender free, but when you see a formation like this, stunts don’t make sense to me. It’s too risky against a running front, obviously.

Pittsburgh is just jealous. We got Cudi and they have Wiz.

by SpecialBrownie on Sep 12, 2011 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree. This is a pretty simple stunt, and run blocking assignments are usually predicated on where a player is pre-snap. If this works we get easy penetration which can really disrupt the play.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Sep 13, 2011 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

If this works we get easy penetration which can really disrupt the play.

This is what I’m saying though. This stunt against this front was very high risk, high reward. It had to be executed perfectly and it wasn’t. Also, I’m still on the idea Taylor pulled this stunt himself be it on intuition or a poor read and it caused DQ to get caught in the crap and Mitchell and Fujita to crash down hard. I don’t see a reason to pull Taylor into an A gap that DQ can very easily cover from his spot. There is no gain from this stunt, IMO.

Pittsburgh is just jealous. We got Cudi and they have Wiz.

by SpecialBrownie on Sep 13, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

3rd and three you just want to stop them at the line. No reason to go for the big blow up.

by HenryDawg on Sep 13, 2011 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

GREAT POST! Whose responsibility would it be to adjust Young into the deep 1/3rd? Is that something he would do on his initiative or is he to stay where he is due to the defensive alignment call?

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Sep 12, 2011 6:50 PM EDT reply actions  

It would either be Young to call to TJ on his own or DQ needs to realize the gap mismatch and make the call.

Pittsburgh is just jealous. We got Cudi and they have Wiz.

by SpecialBrownie on Sep 12, 2011 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Honestly, I don’t know. It’s probably different team-to-team. On another AFCN team with a good defense, their recently re-signed safety might make the call. On the other AFCN with a historically good D, it would probably be their middle linebacker. It could also be up to a coach who isn’t on the field.

These are the problems with a new defense: who has to check to what in what situation against which offensive personnel…it becomes an endless number of situations that you can’t cover in one training camp. And if you do cover them all, you can’t get enough reps in each situation.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Sep 12, 2011 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

So basically you can chalk this one up to inexperience in this particular squad. The idea is to keep these players together so that they can work this kind of stuff out automatically. I hope the Browns keep this team together. I think this last game is the result of too much change. We have the better players in my opinion. They will get better with time and more exposure to the new systems. I hope Shurmur and Jaron are not just fill-ins until Holmgren can snag Gruden or someone. This team does not need more change.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Sep 12, 2011 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right now their D-Lineman are much better. Doesn’t mean ours won’t develop though.

by HenryDawg on Sep 12, 2011 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Greg Little was a C’Mon man.

Ouch.

Pittsburgh is just jealous. We got Cudi and they have Wiz.

by SpecialBrownie on Sep 12, 2011 6:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Really? Of all the bad performances they chose him?

I’m guessing for the block? I agree with someone everyone else here who rather see him throw a block than stand there with his you know what in his hand.

by HenryDawg on Sep 12, 2011 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah it was for the block and run-into Cribbs. C’mon man! His intent was good as he was coming back to block but I don’t think I’ve ever seen a player run into his own guy so solidly when the guy is about to break out and possibly score…

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Sep 12, 2011 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed. I’d be pissed if he hadn’t thrown a block.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Sep 13, 2011 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Since we’re talking about plays, lemme tell you how Daboll’s Left Lane offense isn’t sucking at all right now in Miami. Makes me angry.

Pittsburgh is just jealous. We got Cudi and they have Wiz.

by SpecialBrownie on Sep 12, 2011 7:16 PM EDT reply actions  

It was pretty good last year against NE too. Only time will tell.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Sep 12, 2011 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

There is nothing that will make me miss Daboll.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Sep 12, 2011 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was amazed listening to the announcers proclaim how aggressive Daboll’s offense is. I was curious if they watched anything in Cleveland last year. Made me think that Mangini was not letting Daboll be as agressive as he wanted… or another very plausible reason, we dont have the talent on O.

by -bobby- on Sep 13, 2011 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Or like Ruf said, maybe because he was playing NE, which he probably knows inside and out.

Pittsburgh is just jealous. We got Cudi and they have Wiz.

by SpecialBrownie on Sep 13, 2011 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah he called a great game when we played NE too. Let’s see how he does the rest of the year. We’ll get to see first hand in a couple of weeks.

by HenryDawg on Sep 13, 2011 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

slightly OT to this play, but on the subject of defensive formations: why run LCB and RCB style? why not put haden on the best receiver always?

by DontCallMeJoey on Sep 12, 2011 7:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I’d love to hear Rob Ryan and Dick Juaron debate this answer for you.

What does that MEAN - TO PLAY US OUT?!!?!?

by DaveDawg09 on Sep 12, 2011 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is something I asked myself too, and maybe it’s just my style, but I would have moved Haden everywhere.

I would have said “You want to have Bruce Gradcowski throw on Joe Haden deep in the 4th when running for 3 yards wins you the game? Good luck.” Then proceeded to put both safeties in the box. Sort of the “eff you, try to run the ball” defense, if you will.

I think we did have Haden move around some during the game, but if you do it all game you are just as predictable as if you leave him on one half of the field all game. It’s a chess match between OCs and DCs to get the good matchup/avoid having the bad matchup. If you as the DC allow the offense to predict “If I move the receiver to X position, the defense will let me have the matchup I want” when you lose. You have to mix and match to keep the OC on his heels, just as “run, run, pass” becomes predictable in the reverse.

Moving one player around might not seem like a big deal, but for every possible situation it’s a lot more teaching to the defense. (Insert obvious note about a lack of practice time this year). You have to not only have all the guys know exactly what they are doing at each position, but also physically be able to do it and get enough reps doing it that they can get a sort of “muscle memory” for it.

If you have Haden follow Green into the slot, even that simple movement creates a lot of new things for the defense to learn.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Sep 12, 2011 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok, i hear you. having a player learn LCB responsibilities (especially in the short preseason this year) is much easier than having 4 players learn LCB, RCB, Nickel back, etc. i think i’m willing to accept that.

as to the predictability point, i thought a bit about that, but if you’re shadowing the best receiver w/ the best corner aren’t you kind of daring the OC to stick the best receiver somewhere that both he and the best corner are “out of play”? i guess i see the ability to neutralize the best WR — whether through the play of the best CB or the OC scheming the WR out to try to get rid of the CB — as more valuable than any detriment resulting from being predictable.

but, i’m no coach, and as i said earlier, you guys know a lot more about the x’s and o’s than i do. thanks for the breakdown.

by DontCallMeJoey on Sep 12, 2011 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

You do usually gain a little bit if you neutralize the best WR. The fewer eligible receivers, the less likely any of them will be open; a defense will trade one to take one away every time. But if the opposing OC knows it’s coming, you can do things to plan around that.

You can look to get better matchups elsewhere, and you can run your #2/#3 on concepts where either one should get open. If you are facing the Patriots, for example, Belichick will run Moss/Ochocinco as a decoy 40 times a game and if the QB only has to read the 1/2 of the field without your best corner, the game becomes easier for him.

Truly having your guy follow the WR around means you are playing man all night, which is easy to beat if you know what’s coming. That, or you have to adjust every one of your zone coverages to be without that CB—and since you don’t control where the WR is going to line up, you have to cover every single situation: WR out wide, in the slot, on the other side of the field, in the backfield, in any number of motions…take that and multiply it by the number of zone coverages you have, and then multiply that by your personnel packages…that’s a lot of zone techniques to teach to a lot of players. Not to mention the run fits in all of those coverages.

Also, things like the Mesh concept could work to get that WR open with the help of other offenders. If you know it’s man all game, Mesh is a good concept against man anyway, but you can either “pick” that CB or force a switch.

This is all to say that there is no “magic” football answer. It’s always cat and mouse, with one side adjusting to the other. In the NFL these adjustments take place at an uncanny rate, where you can often only surprise someone or confuse them for half a game. That’s why the read-option worked really well for about 2 weeks in the NFL, while teams had trouble adopting to the spread for years in the NCAA.

You can’t just throw the heat all game, you have to have an off-speed pitch or two. And then you have to make them think they are seeing that changeup when they really aren’t.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Sep 12, 2011 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

are there specifically different assignments for LCB and RCB (partially directed at Rufio)? I get the difference between either and the nickel, but I don’t know what the difference between them is.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Sep 13, 2011 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

In some coverages, yes. In the NFL a lot of the time you will see an “inverted” coverage, the most famous example of which would be the Patriots use of inverted C2 in the super bowl/against Peyton Manning.

You can also have different sky/cloud coverages on different sides of the field. If you flop guys around, the techniques are not fundamentally different but it’s another handful of details both guys have to have down perfectly on gameday.

To be able to flip flop, both CBs need to know not only their job, but more or less the entire secondary, and in some coverages how they will fit into the run fit.

It might not seem like much, but simply performing the movements one way versus another is another consideration. That’s the only fundamental difference though.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Sep 13, 2011 2:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

It seemed like every time they threw on Haden he was guarding Green.

Mangini apologist by default.

by Villeslgr on Sep 13, 2011 12:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

He broke up at least one to Simpson and I think the only one caught on Haden was to Simpson. Unless you count Green’s catch as “on Haden.” I also thought he might have followed Green a little bit, but I am not sure. It definitely wasn’t all game.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Sep 13, 2011 3:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

you are right on that. I think there were two breakups to simpson, though one was a ball where he just tipped it and honestly simpson probably should have caught the ball anyways. His only true pass given up was one to Simpson

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!

by bross09 on Sep 13, 2011 4:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was at the game – this is when I left my seat. I was very surprised at the amount of people who had already left. Maybe they were on the concourse because of the rain (wasn’t THAT bad though)? I remember CIncy being at midfield in a reasonably long down and distance with 1:54ish on the clock, down by 3 and people streaming out of the stands. I couldn’t understand why. Before this play we still had a good shot to get the ball back with at least 1:30 left. This kind of reflected the whole mood in the stands, IMO.

I’m re-watching the game now on DVR (yes, I’m a glutton for punishment) and I have to say – I feel a whole lot better after seeing some of this a second time. I just stopped after the early 3rd quarter FG. I may put up a Fanpost if I have time later with some observations from both the stands and after a second helping (of dinner and the game).

What does that MEAN - TO PLAY US OUT?!!?!?

by DaveDawg09 on Sep 12, 2011 7:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Great tackle by the Bengals TE. I think it’s #81 on Scott Fujita.

Awesome breakdown!

by DavidPuddy on Sep 12, 2011 8:08 PM EDT reply actions  

I saw that too, but I don’t think we can reasonably expect to get that call. It’s like DPI on the last play of the game: it happens all the time but it’s never going to be called.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Sep 12, 2011 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know this is off topic but we don’t have an MNF thread…

I wish Woodhead was on my fantasy team…

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Sep 12, 2011 8:46 PM EDT reply actions  

There’s one now!

by johnf34 on Sep 12, 2011 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / @# / !@
Small
Top 5 Bubble Players
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Buddhathomas_small
Cleveland Browns 2012 Prediction - A Sailor's Perspective
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / !^ / !@
Cribbs_small
2012 Rookie Predictions
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
A look of the 2012 Browns O-line
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / ( / !@
00000021_small
browns Q for 12 who are they
Gray_cat_thinking_small
That time of year again.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Hadenward-new2_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

N3tdgy_medium_small Brownie's Year

Polar_cap_of_mars_planet_small notthatnoise