Fantasy Football Feature – Wk. 3
Welcome to Week 3 of the 2011 NFL season, and the latest edition of the Fantasy Football Feature. If you’re not yet familiar, this is a fantasy football mash-up open thread. Feel free to throw out any sit/start troubles your having, or any other fantasy football related questions, thoughts, ideas you might have or even have live trade negotiation.
Week 2 in Review:
I've got to open this segment recognizing our league leading fantasy scorer, Tom Brady. As I've mentioned in comments before, this guy is inhuman, or least he's playing like it. In two weeks of football, Brady has thrown for 940 yards, 7 touchdowns, and only 1 interception totaling in 65.20 fantasy points. He's doing with this without an elite deep threat like the 2007 Randy Moss. Some around here argue Wes Welker isn't even an elite WR. Outside of that, he's making an all star out of Deion Branch and both his tight ends. These are things that only make Brady's performance up until now even more impressive. Right behind Tom in overall fantasy scoring, is the real fantasy shocker so far, rookie QB and first overall draft pick, Cam Newton. He actually just barely topped Brady this week with 29.58 fantasy points on 432 yards, only 1 TD, and a staggering 3 INTs (-6 pts), also rushing for 53 and another TD. This time it wasn't facing the likes of Arizona, he was taking on the Super Bowl defending Green Bay Packers. In his two weeks, he absolutely looks like the real deal. Sure, he's making rookie mistakes, but numbers like that are undeniable. He is a must buy in any league. Another surprise, also mentioned last week, is Bills quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick. He kept up his performance in a game against Oakland, passing for 264 yards, 3 TDs, and 1 INT totaling 23.86. A middle of the road fantasy quarterback, yet still a surprise, is Rex Grossman (17.14), whose Redskins are now 2-0. Veteran Matt Hasselbeck (17.32) and rookie Andy Dalton (21.58) are two other lesser QBs that are unexpected solid fantasy performers.
This week leading all WR/TE/RBs is Miles Austin (32.10), who was destroying worlds all over fantasy leagues everywhere, with 143 yards and 3 TDs, a nice addition to his 15 points last week. Vincent Jackson (29.20) bounced back in a huge way vs. NE after only putting up 3.10 last week. A similar situation, Jeremy Maclin (29.20) improved on his previous 2, this time vs. ATL. Popping out of nowhere, or what could be considered the lottery of fantasy WRs (Oakland Raiders), is Denarius Moore, who exploded for 23.10 points. What's worse than a lottery? Maybe the black hole of fantasy WRs (Denver Broncos), whose Eric Decker followed up his 11.30 week with a 21.30 performance and looks to be Kyle Orton's go to guy. I doubted Kenny Britt's QB situation facing Baltimore, but was proven completely wrong, as he dropped 19.50 fantasy points and is climbing fast. Larry Fitz (19.30) and Mike Wallace (18.60) bounced back in big ways. Meanwhile, rookie A.J. Green (18.40) and deep threat Devery Henderson (16.30) are turning out to be solid fantasy receivers. Switching to RBs now, Adrian Peterson (26.10), Darren McFadden (24.30), and LeSean McCoy (23.60) all continued rolling. Bigger surprises from fantasy running backs are coming from the likes of Fred Jackson (26.00) who's enjoying his Bills run and Jahvid Best (24.30) who's getting it done on the ground and in the air. Peyton Hillis (21.70) did fantastic in fantasy terms, but benefited from a whopping 27 carries, averaging only 3.5 per, in the Browns game plan to pound the Colts into submission. Michael Turner (20.60) is a must start, but that's expected. Ryan Mathews (18.60) and Matt Forte (16.60) are rounding out the back end of the seemingly must start RBs.
Working the Wire:
As I said last week, this is where championships are won and lost. Even if they’re not at a position of need, good fantasy players are worth keeping off opposing teams. You either take ‘em or you play against ‘em! A handful of the buys last week turned out to worth it, but a couple were misses. That's fantasy football. And in only Week 2, some sleepers are still out there. Keep in mind, owners vary in every league so some of these guys are going to be harder to grab than others. The UDBNFL waiver wire, for example, is still fierce. (*Lastly, the ownership percentage is going up on these guys every minute, so they are not exact.)
- Eric Decker (Den-WR-32.60) - Owned in 22% of Yahoo! Leagues - MUST - The receivers in Denver are dropping like flies. It got to the point that high profile 3rd string QB Tim Tebow was starting at the slot for them. Decker has become Orton's go-to-guy and you can't deny the results.
- Fred Davis (Was-TE-25.10) - Owned in 23% of Yahoo! Leagues - MUST - I'm not ready to believe in Washington as a team yet, but I'm definitely a firm believer in Fred Davis at tight end. Rex Grossman is playing well and he's targeting this TE with very promising production.
- David Nelson (Buf-WR-20.90) - Owned in 9% of Yahoo! Leagues - MUST - Due to Ryan Fitzpatrick, I am a believer in the Bills. I think he's got a bright future and is taking the Bills with him. Stevie Johnson was his guy but so far Nelson actually has 2 more receptions than Johnson.
- Denarius Moore (Oak-WR-23.10) - Owned in 18% of Yahoo! Leagues - DEEP - I mentioned above, Oakland is like the lottery for fantasy WRs, in that it's like any one of them might do well any given week, and the rest, no so much. But 5 receptions for 146/1 makes him worth the bench.
- Danario Alexander (StL-WR-18.20) - Owned in 5% of Yahoo! Leagues - DEEP - In a similar scenario as D. Moore, he had 0 catches in Week 1 then shows up out of nowhere and grabs 3 balls for 122/1. The WR situation on Rams leaves room for a potential up and comer like this guy.
- Brandon LaFell (Car-WR-17.90) - Owned in 3% of Yahoo! Leagues - DEEP - In Carolina, Steve Smith is obviously the go to guy and for good reason. However, with Cam Newton throwing for 400+ yards, there's a ton of room for the rest of those yards. That's where LaFell comes in.
Fool’s Gold:
- Jerome Simpson (Cin-WR-18.00) - Owned in 22% of Yahoo! Leagues - DEEP - I'm not ready to buy into this guy at all yet. His performances against those specific opponents just doesn't really impress me. I'm also not ready to buy this Cinci team in general. It's a wait and see, unless you're desperate.
- Willis McGahee (Den-RB-16.60) - Owned in 55% of Yahoo! Leagues - NOT DEEP - I understand that he's getting a ton more looks with the Moreno injury, I just don't think he'll ever become a legit must start in any leagues other than the ones where you literally have to play any #1 guy.
Big Question:
How healthy is Arian Foster, and how much action will he see Sunday?
Wow. I cannot tell you how sick I am of having to ask this question. It's almost like a running joke at this point. I might have to make it a regular segment of the Fantasy Football Feature, which is so very sad. Except for those smart enough to pass on him and avoid the issue. I can't blame those guys for the "I told you so"-s. Back to Foster and the infamous hammy. In case you haven't heard, he aggravated his previous injury on Sunday. It certainly makes people question Gary Kubiak's all or nothing "you're either ready or you're not" policy he'd been preaching. Turns out Foster wasn't ready, and he spent the large majority of the game riding pine. Not surprisingly, Kubiak has since changed his tone, and since has said that Ben Tate will be the #1 back up until Foster's hamstring is completely healed. Tate's fantasy value was already high since the MRI tweet, but it has since sky rocketed with his play being as good as it has.
Which New England tight end do I start, Gronkowski (35.20) or Hernandez (28.50)?
Since asking the exact same exact question as last week was so much fun with the last one, why not try it again? Well, I know last week we established that any team would should be confident in starting either one or even both of these guys, and we turned out to totally right. That was, until Aaron Hernandez unfortunately suffered an MCL sprain after going for 62 yards and a TD on Sunday against San Diego. The reports are saying he could miss anywhere from 4 to 6 weeks, which is terrible news for his fantasy owners. If Gronkowski's value wasn't already threw the roof (it was, as the league leading TE) it just got even higher.
Other injury concerns:
- Top 5 back Jamaal Charles is on IR and obviously should be dropped in all leagues. This is devastating blow for an already struggling Chiefs team and his fantasy owners alike.
- Mike Vick suffered a concussion and bit his own tongue as he collided helmet to helmet with a teammate in an awkward hit on Sunday night. His status for Week 3 is currently uncertain, but "optimistic."
- Tony Romo suffered a fractured rib as well as a punctured collapsed lung on Sunday, yet still return to the game to deliver a performance that lead Dallas to a victory. His status for Monday is currently "unsure."
- Stevie Johnson is suffering from lingering groin pain despite putting up very solid receiving numbers. Reports say that it's getting worse, but Johnson himself said he doesn't expect to miss any games.
Unofficial DBN Fan League Standings:
I decided to change up the UDBNFL recap a bit. You can click HERE for the full size image of the Week 2 results.
Good luck in Week 3!
*Scores mentioned in the article are based on the Yahoo! Sports default settings, utilized by the Unofficial DBN Fan League.
This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.
92 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I have Hillis and AJ Green. I have a trade offer for Romo and Ghraham (saints TE) My starting TE right now is that buffalo guy and my qb’s are Matt Ryan and Sam Bradford. I have decent depth at rb and reciever( Foster, Fred Jackson, dez bryant santonio holmes, greg jennings) Do I make this deal? I am an absolute hillis homer, and I don’t like Romo, so I’m afraid I’m psyching myself out.
They get:
Hillis and Green
You get:
Romo and Graham
Is this the deal? If so, I wouldn’t take it. Scott Chandler at TE isn’t all that far from Jimmy Graham. Also, your QBs have high upside. With Foster’s injury, Peyton Hillis and Fred Jackson are a great combo. As you say you don’t like Romo, I can’t really see any reason for you to take the deal. If you want new TE, shoot for Fred Davis, or if he’s taken, Jeff King (Ari – 21.70).
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
You don’t trade away a top-knotch fantasy RB for no RB in return, especially not for a TE who is not even that much better than the median fantasy tight end and a QB, who while good, is also not in the elite status of fantasy QBs and thus not much better than the median fantasy QB. Even without Green, just Hillis for those two guys would be a dumb, dumb move.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Sep 20, 2011 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions
HEEELL naw…you reject that and link him to THIS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztVMib1T4T4&list=FLB6dzFEJCv0n2hAoXlRYTwQ&index=24
by johnnyphoenix on Sep 21, 2011 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions
heck no.
you reject this with a “no thanks” message.
"You are the worst villains in football, your evil plan never ceases."-Mooncamping
by discoinferno083 on Sep 20, 2011 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions
I can’t believe I am even asking this question, but Vick or Cam Newton? If there were no injury concerns for Vick, I’d go with him no questions as even though Cam has outscored him two weeks in a row, you don’t ride that on just two weeks’ performance, you ride the guy who consistently performed last year. In other words, you draft Vick to play him. However, the concussion concerns are such that even if he plays, I am thinking he may be a little timid. Thoughts?
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Sep 20, 2011 7:07 PM EDT reply actions
The concussion concern is completely valid, and like you said, even if he plays. And, while Cam has done enough to warrant a pick up in any league, there’s definitely reason to be worried about an inevitable drop off.
I say come out swinging for the fences. Start Cam this week, who’s at home vs. Jacksonville. I think he’s going to keep rolling.
Either way, I like your QB situation. Reid’s old saying is fitting, “It’s a great problem to have.”
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
more interesting question: Vick or Flacco for week 3.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Matt Stafford against the Vikings or Joe Flacco against the Rams?
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
Stafford.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Sep 20, 2011 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Stafford is an every week start. Period.
@grantgw - sports and Cleveland and Columbus stuff
by woodsmeister on Sep 21, 2011 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I have a few questions
-Is Jordy Nelson for real? (as a guy who can get you 9-10 points consistently in fantasy)
-Any thoughts on the touches mcgahee will get?
-is it worth dropping my backup TE who has 4.4 points (and my starter has given me 8+ points the last 2 games) for a D caused I am worried about my D against Rodgers?
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Is Jordy Nelson for real?
The proof is in the pudding. In a league like ours, I’d love to be starting him (over the likes of Jacoby Jones).
Any thoughts on the touches mcgahee will get?
With Knowshon Moreno’s status up in the air, with a hammy injury, it seems like even if he active this week, that McGahee will still be the #1 RB. That said, I don’t think he is a long term fantasy answer by any means.
is it worth dropping my backup TE who has 4.4 points (and my starter has given me 8+ points the last 2 games) for a D caused I am worried about my D against Rodgers?
Absolutely! I almost never carry backup TEs (unless I have two elite ones, which is rare). That roster spot is worth using elsewhere until the bye week comes, and you can drop your worst player for a temp plug.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
I’d love to be starting him
I think there may be some trades a brewing. I have so much depth at WR that I have Dez Bryant at the flex.
I guess if mcgahee starts again that gives me an interesting situation for sunday.
I probably will drop Lance Kendricks for a D this week.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
I probably will drop Lance Kendricks for a D this week.
Yeah,,,I dropped him…you just cant waste a valuable bench spot ‘hoping’ for someone to pan out (when theyve done nothing yet) with bye weeks looming.
by johnnyphoenix on Sep 21, 2011 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions
and the way my team is stacked right now, the only thing I need is a backup D. seriously, as long as my players keep it up, my draft is just dynamite.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
I had a decent draft but am in a 2 QB league and waited too long to pick my second QB…got stuck with Orton. No one available on the waiver wire except guys like Tavaris Jackson, McNabb, Gabbert, and kerry Collins.
Yuck. In my league people hoard QBs like crazy.
by johnnyphoenix on Sep 21, 2011 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions
those 2 QB leagues are tough. I was in a 20 team 2 QB league…so think about that one…
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Yeesh. Definitely not enough QBs to go around there. There must have been a good amount of teams using other positions in the flex spot….which definitely puts you at a huge disadvantage.
This week I was reduced to grabbing Blaine Gabbert hoping against hope he has some success. Definitely a desperation play but I suppose you never know…and if he ends up being respectable ill be kicking myself for not at least checking him out on my bench for a week or two. Its not like I can expect much more from any of the other dildos sitting out there on the waiver wire.
As Im sure your aware in 2 QB leagues teams horde Qbs in order to sell high for some desperate owner. Not going to panic and do that. I’ll just have to hope for the best with Orton for the time being.
by johnnyphoenix on Sep 21, 2011 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions
I could use an outside opinion on this one.
I want some WR depth in one of my leagues and Nate Burleson is available for trade. Originally I had offered Hernandez before I knew he was hurt, and was countered for Felix Jones. I’m not sold on Jones at all and I drafted him pretty much solely because he was the BPA in a later round.
Problem is, if I do give up Jones, I’ll be starting Starks and Bradshaw and I’ll be left with only Deangelo Williams as RB depth and his season is shot as far as I’m concerned. Cam will take half his TD production away, at least and Stewart looks to be their pass-catching back.
My WR situation looks like this: Andre Johnson, Nicks and Stevie Johnson. Beyond that I have Early Doucet who I picked up on a waiver whim and Domenik Hixon who I grabbed as insurance in case Nicks wasn’t able to go on Monday, I’m dropping him this week.
I’m carrying two TE’s but let’s face it, the way the Bucs have been playing, Winslow is not exactly trade bait. Thinking about grabbing McCluster because of his dual position versatility assuming our Jamaal Charles owner doesn’t beat me to it, he’s ahead of me on waiver priority.
Thoughts?
"I guess I shouldn't have started knocking people out." - Vickers
This guy wants a RB2 for a WR3? Too steep.
@grantgw - sports and Cleveland and Columbus stuff
by woodsmeister on Sep 21, 2011 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions
“This guy” here. Not that steep! I’ve been patient with Burleson but I also have Amendola still stashed on my bench. Nate’s going to produce a respectable # of points every week and is in a hot offense. Led the Lions in targets, catches and yards last week, but just didn’t find pay dirt. Sure he’s a WR3, but he’s solid. Can Jones be counted on as an RB2 every week? Nate’s going to break out at some point (he just might become “the black Wes Welker” after all), but I have need at RB right now. Jones is somewhat damaged goods (shoulder) and on a pass-first team…but he’s better than my alternative at RB2.
Burleson also fills a hole you’ll have in Week 7, when Buffalo and NYG both have bye weeks.
I also got jacked on the waiver wire for Helu, Daniel Thomas, and McCluster, so I feel your pain…
Keep the convo going if you want.
by mister serious on Sep 21, 2011 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions
With Burleson you are also betting Stafford stays healthy the rest of the year. Granted, you are still doin that with jones, but I like that more then needing 2 guys to stay healthy (being Nate and Matt).
That’s true (i.e., needing 2 guys to stay healthy) for any receiver. The way this season’s going, it’s a gamble for anyone to stay healthy…
Even if, Shaun Hill’s no disaster.
by mister serious on Sep 21, 2011 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
I didn’t even realise that about the bye weeks.
This would be a lot easier if Yahoo would just take Williams off the can’t cut list. I’d have another roster spot to work with.
"I guess I shouldn't have started knocking people out." - Vickers
To make all fantasy football players lives a libing hell?
Honestly, I don’t really know. I imagine it’s to prevent anyone from making a super team.
"I guess I shouldn't have started knocking people out." - Vickers
I wouldnt give up a 3 down RB like Jones for Burleson. I would only consider a solid #2 WR and only if I was hurting big time at WR.
by johnnyphoenix on Sep 21, 2011 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
How well does looking at a teams depth chart translate to fantasy points? Donald Jones from Buffalo is listed as a starter, and has 6 catches through 2 games. In a very deep league, could he turn out to produce- especially considering the injury to Parrish?
Depth charts mean nothing if they’re not right. David Nelson is the guy in Buffalo after Stevie J.
@grantgw - sports and Cleveland and Columbus stuff
by woodsmeister on Sep 21, 2011 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Y-Town handed my ass to me on a platter last week. It’s hard to beat anyone with 147 points.
My draft is looking worse every day. After watching Eli on Monday, I’m concerned. He’s playing Phily this week. I think Coly vs MIA will get the start this time.
golan 3:16
by Brownie's Year on Sep 21, 2011 12:06 PM EDT reply actions
I’d go with Coly; I have him, and he’s been solid (but Brady’s my starter). Looking back at weeks 1 & 2, Colt scored identically to Eli. I think the matchup this week though, is much better for Colt.
by mister serious on Sep 21, 2011 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I also have Sanchez vs OAK. I think him and Coly will generate 15 a piece.
golan 3:16
by Brownie's Year on Sep 21, 2011 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions
My draft is looking worse every day.
My first round pick is on IR…
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Start Fred Jackson vs. N.E. or MJD vs. Carolina in Gabbert’s first start? This is my RB2 – I’ve got R. Rice as RB1.
You gotta belive the Carolina D is gonna stack the box and force Gabbert to win or lose the game.
What does that MEAN - TO PLAY US OUT?!!?!?
Coin toss. But I say Jackson. NE D stinks.
golan 3:16
by Brownie's Year on Sep 21, 2011 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions
and he won’t for the rest of the year. He is exactly the kind of scrub Peyton Manning made competent.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Sep 21, 2011 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions
I tried to get Decker, but as last in the waiver order, I kind of knew it was a pipe dream.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
I had a claim on Decker, but you stole him from me.
golan 3:16
by Brownie's Year on Sep 22, 2011 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Interesting Trade Proposal: I am offered Wes Welker for Jahvid Best.
Regular scoring league, 2 WR, 2 RB, 1 WR/RB Flex. I need WR help. V-Jax, Colston, Hines Ward & Sims-Walker
I have a lot of RBs but Best has 2nd highest upside: Mendenhall, Hightower, Best, Addai, Pierre Thomas and LTomlinson.
I am leaning towards taking the trade, but that puts a lot of faith in Hightower and/or one of the other guys to be reliable RB2 or flex.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Sep 21, 2011 6:42 PM EDT reply actions
I would consider that. Welker doesnt look like hes going to cool off anytime soon and while you cant let potential injuries influence your decisions…Best IS a significant injury risk, imo. I think you have enough at RB to not lose too much.
by johnnyphoenix on Sep 21, 2011 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Plus, you never know if the Lions will suddenly remember they are the Lions
by johnnyphoenix on Sep 21, 2011 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Hightower will get the carries for Washington. 20+ a game consistently. He is the veteran in that backfield and the best in Pass Pro. I think he is at the worst, an average #2 and then you can play a WR in the slot.
Its hard to say what your backup RB situation will be, but I don’t think the trade will hurt you. It might keep you where you were or make you slightly better. I would definitely consider it.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Took it.
2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion
by TheDriveStillHurts on Sep 22, 2011 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions
OK question:
Is there any way I can justify starting Colt McCoy this week in place of Drew Brees? Any at all?
I want to be able to start Colt at least once, but wisdom probably says I wait until NO’s bye week.
Is there any way I can justify starting Colt McCoy this week in place of Drew Brees? Any at all?
No.
by johnnyphoenix on Sep 21, 2011 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Or…I suppose if you were certifiably insane…that might justify it to a degree.
by johnnyphoenix on Sep 21, 2011 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Simms, any change of thought about Jerome Simpson now that Shipley is done for the season?
"I guess I shouldn't have started knocking people out." - Vickers
Depends on what kind of party you’re having.
@grantgw - sports and Cleveland and Columbus stuff
by woodsmeister on Sep 22, 2011 8:17 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m still skeptical. I just don’t think he’s a real fantasy threat in the long term in that Cincy offense.
Interestingly enough, Simpson actually made it my second strait week of picking up a player on my Fools Gold list.
But… this week it happened because I messed up my waiver priorities, and just swapped him for Denarius Moore, who I think is a slightly better bet. I also swiftly dropped the one from last week too, Early Doucet, for better options.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
This can’t be good news:
Jerome Simpson was questioned by police on Tuesday after a shipment of 2.5 pounds of high grade marijuana was delivered to his Crestview Hills, Kentucky home.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
He is a Bengal after all.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Sep 22, 2011 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions
2.5 pounds of high grade marijuana
at least he gets the good stuff
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
by bross09 on Sep 22, 2011 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
After mulling it over, I have once again entered the realm of the plug-n-play defense/ST weekly revolving door, in my money league. It seems like I eventually hit this point every year.
The biggest issue this year, we’re limited to only 4 adds a week. (A rule that was actually implemented because they thought my 40-50 moves a year [most of it happened the first few weeks] correlated with my constant success.) So, with one of my adds always needed on a defense, I feel even more handcuffed with only 3.
This week I’m taking the match up, a mediocre Arizona defense vs. a very bad Seattle team. (My previous defense, NYG is taking on Philly, which I don’t trust one bit.)
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Hey hope people are still reading this, I currently have Antonio Gates in a PPR league, but I can also pick up Fred Davis or Evan Moore out of free agency.
Stick with Gates and pray he plays against a weak KC defense, get Davis who is getting catches against a weak Dallas defense, or swing for the fences with Moore and hope he gets more targets against a Dolphins defense that cannot stop TE’s?
by BornAKardiacKid on Sep 22, 2011 10:26 PM EDT reply actions
I think Gates should do well, especially in a PPR league. Of course last week wasn’t encouraging. You gotta hope he’s going to bounce back.
If you can afford to use a bench spot, I’d still pick up Fred Davis, if not just to be safe. He’s a great TE for PPR leagues.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Thanks Simmsinns, though I’m still going to keep an eye on Moore, I’ve got a feeling he could be more utilized as the season continues.
by BornAKardiacKid on Sep 23, 2011 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions
I too have Gates. He should have a bigger game against KC. The Patriots were rolling double coverage over him and pretty much eliminated him from last weeks game. I think he will have a bigger game game this week. Also, I agree with Simms, pick up Fred Davis regardless.
"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden
Gates is out. You could pick-up McMicheal
by Bernie19Kosar on Sep 24, 2011 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions
























