Fantasy Football Feature – Wk. 4

Welcome to Week 4 of the 2011 NFL season, and the latest edition of the Fantasy Football Feature. If you’re not yet familiar, this is a fantasy football mash-up open thread. Feel free to throw out any sit/start troubles your having, or any other fantasy football related questions, thoughts, ideas you might have or even have live trade negotiation.
Week 3 in Review:
I think the biggest shocker of Week 3 came in Buffalo's upset of New England to remain undefeated and top the AFC East. Another big surprise were Tom Brady's 4 interceptions in that game. Despite that, he still threw for 387 yards and 4 touchdowns, totaling in a season low 27.98 fantasy points. Other big weeks for a few lower profile fantasy quarterbacks included Joe Flacco's 28.26 point outing vs. the Rams. Also, Mark Sanchez dropped 369 yards and 2 TDs on Oakland, with an additional rushing TD, scoring 27.96 points. Drew Brees topped the QBs this week with 28.70, staying consistent with the best tier. Matt Schaub (25.92) and Eli Manning (25.86) had solid fantasy weeks, just need to see those numbers more often. Aaron Rodgers (23.18), as well as two guys you might night expect to see lumped in with him, Matthew Stafford (23.02) and Ryan Fitzpatrick (20.16) are all QBs yet to have a week under 20 fantasy points. Last note, Cam Newton (15.02) may have fallen back to Earth, at least for now. However, if that's what a bad day is for Cam, we've seen the good days, this kid is still a worthy fantasy starter. Overall, it was a fairly tame week from our QBs.
After taking a small step back last week, Wes Welker exploded once again, catching 16 passes for 217 yards, 2 TDs and even rushed for 19 yards, finishing the game with 35.60 fantasy points. This weeks "Show Up Out of Nowhere And Drop Bombs" receiver comes in the form of Torrey Smith of the Ravens, who helped Flacco in his big day, and vice versa. The 2011 second round pick caught all three of the team's TD passes, with 152 yards for 34.20 points. Another obscure receiver who might soon find himself a hot fantasy commodity, Victor Cruz (23.00). He moved up the NYG depth chart with injuries to both Hixon and Manningham. Lance Moore (18.80) finally had some solid numbers, recovering from an injury as well. Now for the running backs, Darren McFadden (29.80) is continuing his monster break out season, where he now leads the league in rushing and all RBs in fantasy points. Another emerging break out star is Ryan Mathews (26.90), getting it done on the ground and through the air. In his 5th season, the Bills' Fred Jackson (22.10) is on pace for a great season. An even older veteran, one time fantasy scoring machine, LaDainian Tomlinson (21.40) had a huge week for the Jets. LeSean McCoy (20.10), is only 0.3 from the RB scoring leader, as he too continues a fantastic season so far. Lastly, the TE spot, where 99% owned Jermichael Finley (26.50) has finally warranted it, bringing in three TD receptions and Rob Gronkowski (22.90) rolls on having quite possibly the best fantasy season for a TE through the first 3 weeks ever.
Working the Wire:
This weeks addition is written a few days later than normal, so in most leagues the waivers have already gone through. Still, if any of these guys are still available, grab them while you can. Keep in mind, owners vary in every league so some of these guys are going to be harder to grab than others.
- Torrey Smith (Bal-WR-34.20) - Owned in 11% of Yahoo! Leagues - MUST - This kind of receiver is just what Baltimore needed. Of course the Rams D isn't good, and I can't guarantee any consistency, but he's worth the roster spot.
- Nate Washington (Ten-WR-31.80) - Owned in 28% of Yahoo! Leagues - DEEP - With Kenny Britt going down, he's got to be Hasselback's go to WR. And he's already been getting targets. That said, it's still the Tennessee Titans.
- Victor Cruz (NYG-WR-24.70) - Owned in 5% of Yahoo! Leagues - DEEP - As long as Hixon and Manningham are hurt, his guy is has a shot. He might emerge, he might not. It's a fairly deep buy, but if you can spare a bench spot, what can it hurt?
Big Question:
How healthy is Arian Foster, and how much action will he see Sunday?
This is too much fun to stop now. Sigh, can you hear the excitement in my voice? That was sarcasm by the way. For the fourth strait week, Foster's status is up in the air. This time around, reports are that he has no issues with the hamstring whatsoever after participating in a full practice Wednesday. He claims that he "could’ve played last week, but they just wanted to reassure that it wasn’t going to be reoccurring." But I'm still skeptical, especially with a game against Pittsburgh on the horizon. The thing is, at least last week, Ben Tate owners could start Tate with confidence, and got decent turnaround. Now they're both risky, not knowing who'll be getting the carries. The most dreaded fantasy starts are those with injury uncertainties.
Other injury concerns:
- If you haven't heard yet, the early reports about Kenny Britt being out for the year turned out to be true, as he tore his ACL and MCL. He's been placed on IR. It's a shame because he was starting to look like a very promising top tier fantasy WR.
- Hakeem Nicks status is in question, suffering from swelling in his knee. Tom Coughlin thinks he will start for the upcoming game against the Cardinals, but if you're a Nicks owner, this is definitely worth keeping an eye on.
- Dez Bryant missed practice on Thursday, and was limited on Wednesday with an apparent quad injury. If you're counting on Bryant this week, you might want to keep checking on his status, possibly up until Sunday morning.
Unofficial DBN Fan League Standings:
You can click HERE for the full size image of the Week 2 results.
Good luck in Week 4!
*Scores mentioned in the article are based on the Yahoo! Sports default settings, utilized by the Unofficial DBN Fan League.
This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Who do I play at Defense Baltimore or Detroit? I want to go down to one defense so that I can have 2 TE’s especially since mine only TE right now (after Hernandez got hurt) is Evan Moore, or would it be a better idea to switch out Moore for Chandler?…
However I already have Fred Jackson and do I really want to have my fantasy team that invested in the Bills?
Baltimore, easily. Depending on the size of your league, it’s probably really not worth holding on to 2 defenses especially with one of them being Baltimore. When they have their bye, pick up a decent plug-n-play matchup.
Evan Moore is a much bigger risk on a weekly basis than Chandler, at least for now. It’s no surprise Moore is only owned in 5% of Yahoo leagues. I think you should switch them out, and not have to worry about investing too much into the Bills, again until the bye week works it way around.
I’ve always valued those bench spots very highly, because it allows you to hoard (to an extent) potential sleepers picked up off of the waiver wire. The more of those guys you can have, the better your odds of landing the one that is this season’s Miles Austin or Arian Foster type. Someone like that is infinitely more valuable than a backup defense or TE, just to cover you the one week you’ll need it.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Wtf do I do with CJ? He cost me a win last week against my pregnant boss who drafted Cadillac IN THE FIRST ROUND. I’m never going to live it down.
Pittsburgh is just jealous. We got Cudi and they have Wiz.
This is why fractional points are a must. Really defies any kind of logic to not have them, unless some leagues have a sort of undying love for ties.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Not sure how the fractional points work. I commish a cbs league and don’t remember that option. I set it up to break ties with the qb passing yards. It has only come into play once in two years.
Okay, so in my money league I have to start two defenses. D’s score a pretty good amount of points in my league, so it isn’t a throw away start.
Through a trade this week, I picked up Green Bay’s D to go with Baltimore and New York Jets. I’m going to go with Green Bay vs. Denver, but any thoughts on who will be the better bet in the Jets-Ravens match-up? I’m leaning Baltimore.
great D’s to have.
possibly a crap-shoot, but i’d lean Baltimore, as well.
"You are the worst villains in football, your evil plan never ceases."-Mooncamping
by discoinferno083 on Sep 29, 2011 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I would think Baltimore at home as well. Jets couldn’t get any kind of ground game goin against Oakland last week. Also expect Raven’s to get their typical share of defensive points scored, turnovers and secondary should sit on Sanchez throws middle or deep.
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is. -- Yogi Berra
by JustPlainBrowns on Sep 29, 2011 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I think Baltimore is the safer bet, but it is close. Not a bad trio.
I’d imagine in seemingly defense intensive league like that, the aspects of the draft are changed pretty significantly. What round are they picked? My guess would be somewhere around the 3rd, but it depends on how much more these defenses are scoring, compared to average leagues.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
Our goal in the league scoring is to make everything as even as possible.
A great WR can score as high as a great QB or RB. Even great TE’s can score high. All we did is tweak the defenses so they can score high as well. That is why we start two.
Just for an idea, last year Hillis scored 268.44 points in our league last season. Green Bay’s defense scored 240.48 points.
But Denver, the league worst defense in our league scored 60.16 points.
What it does is makes sure that the team with the strongest top to bottom roster usually wins. Plus, you can start a multitude of positions in all sorts of ways. 3 RB’s, 2 WR’s and 1 TE, or 2 RB’s, 2 WR’s and 2 TE’s. No matter how you draft, you can fill out your roster in the best way you think. My brother is killing people with his Brady-Gronkowski duo.
If you are more interested, I could send you a copy of our scoring settings. I think it is the best, I have spent almost 7 years getting it perfect.
by Bernie19Kosar on Sep 29, 2011 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions
I should note that the reason we start two is because if we pumped up the defensive scoring, almost everyone would have a high scoring defense. The trick is getting that second defense. If you a great one (like GB) it can be offset if you start a garbage defense like Jax (99 points last season).
I drafted Jets in the 8th round and the Ravens in the 9th.
People used to laugh, but now that is the hot spot for our league to go on a run for defense. It was a huge reason I made a trade this week (Sent DJax, Daniel Thomas, Eric Decker and St. Louis defense for Greg Jennings and GB defense). In a PPR DJax is a roll of the dice, and with Vincent Jax I needed something a bit more consistent.
by Bernie19Kosar on Sep 29, 2011 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions
wouldn’t that Moore guy from Oak be a great waiver wire addition?
"You are the worst villains in football, your evil plan never ceases."-Mooncamping
by discoinferno083 on Sep 29, 2011 10:12 PM EDT reply actions
Yes! That is if he’s still available. He was on the Wire list in last weeks addition.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
i figured. cheers to you.
"You are the worst villains in football, your evil plan never ceases."-Mooncamping
by discoinferno083 on Sep 29, 2011 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Two questions about my other league.
1. Vincent Jackson is questionable. Kickoff is at 4:15. I do not have another WR with a 4:15 game (all 1:00). Should I risk getting 0 points if Jackson doesn’t play? If he goes, it’ll probably be more than what Mike Thomas or Dexter McCluster.
2. Should I start Steven Jackson even though he may not get many carries? Or should I keep McFadden and Sproles?
1. Gotta hate those “listed as questionable” fantasy starts. But, given your other options, I think it’s probably worth the risk.
2. Sproles and Jackson is a toss up. But McFadden you have to start.
"I want my unwarranted optimism back." -Dilbert
I have VJax in my money league.
He should play, and Vonte Davis has been ruled out for the Dolphins. Start him.
by Bernie19Kosar on Oct 1, 2011 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions





















