Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Holmgren and Heckert to Speak Thursday at 11 AM EST

If you are near a radio or a computer on Thursday, January 5th at 11:00 AM EST, then make sure you are glued to it. Cleveland Browns team president Mike Holmgren and general manager Tom Heckert will be hosting their season-closing press conference, and it is bound to be a bit more exciting that Pat Shurmur's season-closing press conference. I would anticipate a few more details about free agents, the team's draft interests, and other things to be discussed. Maybe Holmgren will give a more concrete timetable as to when an offensive coordinator will be hired as well.

Anyway, you can watch the conference live on ClevelandBrowns.com or listen on WTAM-1100. I'm sure 92.3 The Fan will probably be covering/discussing it as well.

Comment 297 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

That’s good to know. I’ll check out the website as I’m sure a transcript will be available somewhere.

Honor. Courage. Commitment.

by Brownsbacker488 on Jan 5, 2012 1:17 AM EST reply actions  

I expect great thib…

by macdowellm03 on Jan 5, 2012 2:31 AM EST via Android app reply actions   2 recs

It’ll be on WKNR-850 too.

Dawgs By Nature - Where winning, apparently, did some bad things.

by Simmsinns on Jan 5, 2012 4:49 AM EST reply actions  

I feared that Rizzo and Goldhammer would just be talking about their favorite food or something instead.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Jan 5, 2012 8:18 AM EST up reply actions  

They said yesterday that they’re going to air it in it’s entirety without commercial interruption.

Dawgs By Nature - Where winning, apparently, did some bad things.

by Simmsinns on Jan 5, 2012 8:21 AM EST up reply actions  

i think i love your avatar.

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

by pwndabear on Jan 5, 2012 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

5 inch lifts in his cleats, a scope to scan the field and quicker reaction time is what he needs. All the receivers in the world are not going to change that.

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I would love to get Luck or RG3, but if they don’t take one of those guys it’s because of the player Colt has already shown us he can be. We saw it last year when he had protection, a running game, and Watson and Hillis catching passes. Colt had none of those this year and it showed. I trust H+H’s judgement on this one.

"Do I talk to myself? No, I just remind myself of what I’m trying to do. You know, I never answer myself so how can I be talking to myself?" - Ricky Henderson

by dawgtribe on Jan 5, 2012 1:02 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

The press conference is live on the team site now, these two empty chairs are rather compelling public speakers.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 10:33 AM EST reply actions  

these two empty chairs are rather compelling public speakers.

You sure that’s not just Shurmur?

Dawgs By Nature - Where winning, apparently, did some bad things.

by Simmsinns on Jan 5, 2012 10:36 AM EST up reply actions  

its actually a surprise guest in Colt McCoy but they forgot to give him a booster seat

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

by pwndabear on Jan 5, 2012 10:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Mic check guy just checked the mic. Riveting stuff.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 10:35 AM EST reply actions  

Mic check guy dropped the ball and checked the same mic twice.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 10:39 AM EST reply actions  

system failure

Dawgs By Nature - The REAL International House of Pancakes

by Gabe Durrant on Jan 5, 2012 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Blow up the audio crew

by HenryDawg on Jan 5, 2012 10:20 PM EST up reply actions  

hey, he’s “battling”!

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Looks like they sent out the backup mic check guy. Wonder if the first guy’s day is done.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 10:48 AM EST reply actions  

The second guy thought he deserved a shot at being the mic check guy all year.

Even Doug Dieken admits Joe Thomas is the real #73

by Doc's Kid on Jan 5, 2012 5:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Hell yeah! Woke up just in time for this.

by Brownie's Year on Jan 5, 2012 10:52 AM EST reply actions  

Terry Pluto keeps walking around in front of the camera, still looks like Vizzini.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

The important men were 3 minutes late.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 11:03 AM EST reply actions  

currying favor with the local media . . .

by Les Fleurs Du Mal on Jan 5, 2012 11:04 AM EST reply actions  

Tom always has that “Who farted” look on his face.

by Brownie's Year on Jan 5, 2012 11:07 AM EST reply actions  

Holmgren still likes McCoy. Nit sure if he has “it”.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 11:08 AM EST reply actions  

*not

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t like the comfort level with McCoy and Wallace going forward as starters. I don’t think either would start anywhere else in the NFL. Why are we satisfied at this position with QBs that are in the bottom half of the league? This cannot be the strategy going forward. Hopefully it is a smoke screen.
Oh and just to intercept this comment… “there is no one around him” I don’t think either McCoy or Seneca would be any better on Green Bay.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Jan 5, 2012 11:17 AM EST reply actions  

two QB’s in the bottom half of the league??? this better not be DA and BQ all over again. i thought we got off that merry-go-round!

Lifes A Dance, You Learn As You Go!

by findlaybrownslover on Jan 5, 2012 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Nah, our QB situation is the eternal carnival ride from hell. Makes “Something Wicked This Way Comes” look like a picnic.

by Off-the-Chain on Jan 5, 2012 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, when you keep picking guys up that 32 other teams pass on for 3 rounds, those are not even close to sure things. These are lottery picks that you hope might pan out. Most of the time they will not. You are not serious about getting a QB that can play unless you pick one early in the draft. Look at Cincy, Detroit and many others. If you have a decent QB you can pick one in the 3rd round and hope he pans out… you can always trade him if he looks decent for a couple of games when your starter goes down. But pinning your hopes on a later-round pick when you have nothing and saying that guy and some permanent backup like Wallace are going to compete for the starting position next year hopefully is just blowing smoke.

Brownsyup

by Brownsyup on Jan 5, 2012 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

more than blowing smoke, its a band aid. but i think they(h&h) are ready to have surgery instead of just replacing the band aid all the time.

Lifes A Dance, You Learn As You Go!

by findlaybrownslover on Jan 5, 2012 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Sounds like they’re not going to do anything in FA again :(

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 11:17 AM EST reply actions  

Taking fans for granted.
Trying to watch on slow connection.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 11:19 AM EST reply actions  

“Cleveland Browns fans will be Browns fans forever and ever” …. not sure how to take that?

by Les Fleurs Du Mal on Jan 5, 2012 11:20 AM EST reply actions  

This.

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Or at least the most willing to put up with the nonsense this franchise does to us.

by Off-the-Chain on Jan 5, 2012 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

See my post above. Taking fans for granted.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Mike Holmgren emphasizing how it’s actually his third first year.

Dawgs By Nature - Where winning, apparently, did some bad things.

by Simmsinns on Jan 5, 2012 11:21 AM EST reply actions  

Saw Grossi mention this, if there was any doubt they were trying to buy themselves a year, it should be gone now.

by Roger Dorn on Jan 5, 2012 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Holmgren made a joke, no one laughed.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 11:24 AM EST reply actions  

It was pretty awkward.

by Off-the-Chain on Jan 5, 2012 11:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Holmgren was very, very quick to brush off the Hillis question.

Dawgs By Nature - Where winning, apparently, did some bad things.

by Simmsinns on Jan 5, 2012 11:25 AM EST reply actions  

Story time with Mike Holmgren! It’s about being a coach and stuff.

by Off-the-Chain on Jan 5, 2012 11:26 AM EST reply actions  

We will learn nothing in this presser. Just realized that. Back to work…

by Les Fleurs Du Mal on Jan 5, 2012 11:27 AM EST reply actions  

OH MY GOD IN HEAVEN.

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

PAUL BROWN, BACK FROM THE DEAD AND COACHING FOR US!!!!

by Off-the-Chain on Jan 5, 2012 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

HOLMGREN BRINGING IN PEYTON MANNING.

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 11:31 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

…AS OFFENSIVE COORDINATOR! MIGHT TRY TO GET LUCK TOO!

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Jan 5, 2012 11:32 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

ALSO SIGNED MATT FLYNN!

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

and pontbrand.

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

by pwndabear on Jan 5, 2012 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Stop lying.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Jan 5, 2012 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

C’mon, you should have already known that.

Dawgs By Nature - Where winning, apparently, did some bad things.

by Simmsinns on Jan 5, 2012 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah, but i am naive. And bored as hell at work. Work is for jerks.

by Les Fleurs Du Mal on Jan 5, 2012 11:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Pat Shurmur: Battled this year.

by Off-the-Chain on Jan 5, 2012 11:34 AM EST reply actions  

Pat Shurmur did some good things.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

he reinvents the west coast offense and doesnt afraid of anything!

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

by pwndabear on Jan 5, 2012 11:39 AM EST up reply actions  

He’s a bad enough dude to save the president.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 11:40 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

All the base are belong to Shurmur.

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 11:42 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

This pretty much captures Shurmur for me.

by ouched on Jan 5, 2012 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

They are not telling us anything. Basically they are not going to tip there hand. One thing he did say is he is not ready to say Colt is the guy. He did say Greg Little is the guy as far as receivers and complimented the defense, but he is not going to tip his hand, smartly he is saying the right things.

HE DID SAY PAT SHURMUR IS THE COACH AND WILL BE THE COACH FOR THE FORSEABLE FUTURE, and he is saying that in Green Bay it took 5 years, Seattle it took 7 years, and in both cases he said we found the quarterback in year 1 in Green Bay and year 3 in Seattle. He did not follow it up by saying we have our quarterback, I think that is the point.

Basically we are a work in process and the only area that he and Heckert are feeling good about is the defense.

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 11:40 AM EST reply actions  

Why won't you just leave Colt alone?

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

is that emily??

Lifes A Dance, You Learn As You Go!

by findlaybrownslover on Jan 5, 2012 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

lol thats one hot transvestite! j/k

Lifes A Dance, You Learn As You Go!

by findlaybrownslover on Jan 5, 2012 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I am guessing a beautiful red head? Right emily?

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I am guessing a beautiful red head?

No need to bring me in to this conversation.

by Brownie's Year on Jan 5, 2012 2:01 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Please tell us you are a female. because if not we did not need to read what you typed lol

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re the one that thinks I’m beautiful. That’s your problem.

by Brownie's Year on Jan 5, 2012 3:34 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

This made me laugh!

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden

by Kimble_79 on Jan 5, 2012 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

by the way Emily…how about that game last night? LOL

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden

by Kimble_79 on Jan 5, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Congratulations. WVU deserved it and could have put up 100 if they really wanted to.

Clemson Tigers 2011 ACC Champions

by emily522 on Jan 5, 2012 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Thought it was gonna be a good game until the 2nd qtr started. Kind of went lopsided after that. If we could play like that every game, we could be champs. Shows how inconsistent WVU is week to week.

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden

by Kimble_79 on Jan 5, 2012 3:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I knew the second that turnover happened that the wheels would come off and we would lose. Not to that degree, but I knew it was over.

Clemson Tigers 2011 ACC Champions

by emily522 on Jan 5, 2012 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, and yes that’s Tavon Austin in my picture.

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden

by Kimble_79 on Jan 5, 2012 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I think its every kid ever to be on Fame ever.

by Off-the-Chain on Jan 5, 2012 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

or an american idol qualifier round winner!

Lifes A Dance, You Learn As You Go!

by findlaybrownslover on Jan 5, 2012 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

When sitting still, Heckert waddles like a penguin.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 11:43 AM EST reply actions  

We closed the gap a tiny bit in the AFC North this year. Strange as it may seem, I agree with that. No AFCN teams truly blew us out of the water this year.

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 11:43 AM EST reply actions  

Baltimore did in the first game

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 11:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Despite the 300 rushing yards, it was a 1 TD game until we gave up that punt return. The D kept us in games, the ST lost at least 2 games just by themselves.

by HenryDawg on Jan 5, 2012 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Three if you are counting the baltimore game. I am not.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 6, 2012 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

he called Heckert a used car salesman… ha

by Les Fleurs Du Mal on Jan 5, 2012 11:50 AM EST reply actions  

Wait, if Heckert is expecting compensatory picks he must be expecting guys to leave. Right?

by Les Fleurs Du Mal on Jan 5, 2012 11:51 AM EST reply actions  

I would have to say yes. Who are our UFAs this season?

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Heckert has a butt chin to end all butt chins.

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 11:53 AM EST reply actions  

I prefer the term “face ass” personally.

by ouched on Jan 5, 2012 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m getting the feeling we’re not going to draft RG3.

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 11:55 AM EST reply actions  

EXACTLY!!! I said that.

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m fine with it. I’d rather have Kahlil or Blackmon anyhow.

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I think trading the pick may be in the cards

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn’t have a problem with it depending on the return. If we got another solid pick or two and only have to move down a few slots to 6-8, where it’s possible someone like Blackmon could still possibly fall to us, I’s be pleased as punch. We should be so lucky to have the Phins and Skins get into a bidding war for our pick over RG3.

by ouched on Jan 5, 2012 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Blackmon wont be available when we pick 4. and if he is, we’d be dumb not to take him. I think hes gone at 2 to STL. He could make Bradford look real good.

by -bobby- on Jan 5, 2012 7:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Don’t you think and effort to get Luck will be made?

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t foresee us going after Luck.

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 12:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I think they at least make an inquiry if only for due diligence. Whether the Colts would part with it for anything less than our next 2 entire drafts remains to be seen.

by ouched on Jan 5, 2012 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Our two frist roundn picks and our first rounder next year? Think the Colts would consider it?

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

first round picks I meant

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

We’re probably the only QB hungry club that can make that offer, and I think they’d hold out for a little more. At least a 2nd from one draft and and 3rd from the other. They’d take us to the woodshed.

by ouched on Jan 5, 2012 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

It will definetly be used for an offensive player. I am hoping not Running Back is all

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Even if it is expensive?

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

He is not really saying much about anything though, just thast ever position on the offense can be upgrade

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

The presser really made me think Trent Richardson. But I really really hope not.

Dawgs By Nature - Where winning, apparently, did some bad things.

by Simmsinns on Jan 5, 2012 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Please not this. Please.

by Off-the-Chain on Jan 5, 2012 12:15 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

NO

Clemson Tigers 2011 ACC Champions

by emily522 on Jan 5, 2012 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think Richardson is bad, but ugh.

Clemson Tigers 2011 ACC Champions

by emily522 on Jan 5, 2012 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree. I don’t think he’s bad either, but he’s not the best choice the Browns could make at this point.

by Off-the-Chain on Jan 5, 2012 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

No way to Richardson @ #4. We absolutely need a QB or WR with our first pick.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ll be happy whomever we draft so long as they aren’t named Richardson or Kalil. That being said, I have faith in Heckert that whomever he actually picks.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I would be disappointed with Richardson or Kalil, but at the end of the day, both players make us better so it’s not worth crying over if it happened. I don’t see it though.

by HenryDawg on Jan 5, 2012 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I definitely would not count out Blackmon if he’s still on the board at 4.

Dawgs By Nature - Where winning, apparently, did some bad things.

by Simmsinns on Jan 5, 2012 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I would love blackmon if he’s on the board at 4. I don’t think RGIII will be on the board at 4. But if he was I think I’d still prefer Blackmon. Not quite sure about it though.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

If no one trades down I think Griffin will be there. In this scenario I don’t think Blackmon will be.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Washington will trade up for RGIII. I’ve said that in another thread.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I think That Indy picks Luck, the Rams take Kalil, and the Vikes take Blackmon. Those two could be reversed though. Not sure how good/bad the Vikes’ line is though.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

We will hope it will be that way.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Terrible but also either of those team could take Claiborne, they have really bad secondaries.

by HenryDawg on Jan 5, 2012 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Wahington will break the bank on Manning and then he won’t even be able to play.

by HenryDawg on Jan 5, 2012 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Jan 5, 2012 6:04 PM EST up reply actions  

You have the best A/V stuff.

DBN, where I will never understand why they fired Mangini. We went 4-12.

by The New Kardiac Kids on Jan 5, 2012 6:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Jan 5, 2012 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Good, I don’t even want them to mention him until we turn in the card.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 6, 2012 12:10 AM EST up reply actions  

He is not going to say it, but our quarterbacks height is a problem. He danced around it.

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 11:55 AM EST reply actions  

I thought they acknowledged that our QBs would be able to qualify for this year’s dwarf tossing pro bowl, but they don’t think it is absolutely necessary to have a big guy like Ben or Flacco.

by tribe71 on Jan 5, 2012 12:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Its really not his height or arm strength as much as his inability to set his feet and deliver the ball. He panics too much and throws from bad positions. A stronger armed QB can do that, he can’t.

by HenryDawg on Jan 5, 2012 10:37 PM EST up reply actions  

He also could stand to gain some arm strength a la Manning.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 6, 2012 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I like listening to these guys. They need to at least speak to the season ticket holders more during the year if not the full blown media.

by tribe71 on Jan 5, 2012 12:00 PM EST reply actions  

They’re talking about Hardesty’s injuries, CLEARLY THAT MEANS COLT ISN’T THE GUY!!!!!!!!2

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:03 PM EST reply actions  

Stop being a jerk off

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Stop being annoying. Your schtick is too thick.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

You are right they think Colt McCoy is Drew Brees and Steve Young, I am wrong. For them not to say we are sticking with Colt McCoy who is in year 3 coming up says they are looking to upgrade that position. YOU SHOULD WANT THAT. WE ARE PUTRID AT THE QB postion. Stop jumping on and saying I am saying the same thing over and over. IT IS OUR BIGGEST PROBLEM, not our only problem.

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

You ARE saying the same thing over and over.

You are right they think Colt McCoy is Drew Brees and Steve Young, I am wrong.


If you look at my comments, I am steadily behind us drafting Griffin. I’ve never said that Colt is the answer. That being said I trust this FO, and if they decide Colt is the guy, and they draft Blackmon, I won’t be bitching about it.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I think today though they said (not straight out) that Taller and bigger is preferrable at QB, so do you think they would draft RG3 if we have guys that size already? Is he that physical that they could take another chance on a “smaller” quarterback (I know he is taller than Colt), just asking?

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think height is the end all be all for quarterbacks.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

No, There are good 6 ft. QBs but it does seem to be a problem for Colt.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not so sure on that. I haven’t noticed an adverse amount of balls being batted down at the LoS that I’m questioning his height.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

NCF, I’m with you on this. All other things being equal, I’d love a 6’5" QB. However, height isn’t one of Colt’s issues. He has several real concerns, but that one is not one of them.

by Legoman0721 on Jan 5, 2012 1:17 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

I do think height is a problem for him. He has to get into passing lanes and when he does he stares down the receivers, HE cannot see the field. I think it is an issue. He did have a lot of batted balls too

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

(1)I do think height is a problem for him. He has to get into passing lanes and (2)when he does he stares down the receivers, HE cannot see the field. I think it is an issue. (3)He did have a lot of batted balls too

I labeled your comment in the order of the points I’m replying to, hope you don’t mind:

(1) I don’t think it’s really a problem that he can’t see over his linemen, when you are blocking, or setting up to block someone you aren’t standing straight up, or you would get put on your ass. So it’s very easy to say that someone who is 6’1" can see over a 6’5" lineman.

(2) This is a criticism that I agree with, to an extent. I think a lot of it also has to do with our lack of talent at WR as it seems to take forever for them to make any sort of break or get any separation. He’s basically throwing to a middle of the pack #2 and a bunch of #4 or > players if they were on any other team.

(3) I’m not completely sure on this, maybe one of ours stats guys can look it up, but in the games I watched I definitely did NOT see a large amount of balls being batted down at or around the LoS.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I noticed our guys jumping up when they throw, even when they aren’t avoiding defenders diving at them. Anyone know why they do this?

by tribe71 on Jan 5, 2012 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Ever notice also that our receivers seem to be in pairs. The seem to run to the same areas and close together. Believe me I think we need better receivers too. When they sometimes show an overhead shot our receivers are bunched.

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Uh, what?

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

and taller and bigger being preferrable is common sense really.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Jan 5, 2012 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

He’s not small goddam it, how many times do you need to be told this?

by HenryDawg on Jan 5, 2012 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I could see the colts grabbing Luck, the vikes taking RG3, and the rams taking blackmon, and then the browns going Ot then WR with their first 2 picks, then going for an outside LB and DE, and then adding some more DB depth. If the asking price for flynn is too great theyll stick with colt another year and go after barkley next year.

by jonnyphoenix on Jan 5, 2012 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

They will also probably draft another QB ‘project’ in the later rounds.

by jonnyphoenix on Jan 5, 2012 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think the Rams will pass on Kalil. Blackmon may end up falling right into our laps.

"The rush of battle is a potent and almost lethal addiction, for war is a drug."

by dirtyjoe on Jan 5, 2012 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I hope so. I just see them wanting blackmon for bradford.

by jonnyphoenix on Jan 5, 2012 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the chance we take an OT at 4 is slim to none.

by Roger Dorn on Jan 5, 2012 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

It depends on what happens before…but to be honest I wouldnt have a problem with it if the OT is significantly better than any of the WRs left at his position. I mean, it is absolutely an area they have been weak at for years and years…and it has been a constant pain in the ass…that right side. A stud OT there locked in for 7 years would really help alot, imo.

by jonnyphoenix on Jan 5, 2012 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I used to think this way too. But an argument with rufio a couple years ago has me thinking differently about a RT that early in the draft.

by Brownie's Year on Jan 5, 2012 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

how about with uor second first-rounder?

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s a stretch but still too early. 4th round is ideal. An OL in the first is OK for the like of Joe Thomas. That’s just a special case though.

by Brownie's Year on Jan 5, 2012 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

i wish barret jones were coming out this year. he can play every position on the line, and he could back-up joe thomas, if joe decided to go fishing or something.

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Good save at the end

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden

by Kimble_79 on Jan 5, 2012 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

i hear the fish gladly jump into the boat!

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Don’t forget that he lets others hold their fish closer to the camera.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 10:31 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I disagree with this. I think the best teams in the league, the best O, generally have a great OL that is loaded with 1st rounders (3 or more).

by -bobby- on Jan 5, 2012 7:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Name one team that drafted their OL through draft.

by Brownie's Year on Jan 5, 2012 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

SF for one off the top of my head. I think 2 years ago they draft 2 1st round OL (Iupati and some OT i think)

by -bobby- on Jan 5, 2012 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I looked it up bc it was bothering me. Anthony Davis was the 2nd, and they also have 1st rounder Joe Staley. Not a great O, but you can bet Alex Smith is doing better this year from a great OL.

by -bobby- on Jan 5, 2012 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

They drafted Iupati in the 1st as well. They definitely have invested multiple picks on the line. Jacksonville has a good running game and have drafted line.

by Roger Dorn on Jan 5, 2012 8:00 PM EST up reply actions  

And Jacksonville sucks. The correlation to winning is much stronger between good QB and winning than it is between good line and winning.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 6, 2012 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

NE has 2 1st rounder they drafted (Light and Soldier) and 2 2nd rounders (Vollmer and Mankins).

by -bobby- on Jan 5, 2012 7:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Mankins was a 1.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Jan 5, 2012 11:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Matt Light wasn’t a first rounder.

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 6, 2012 12:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry flipped Mankins and Light.

by -bobby- on Jan 6, 2012 12:24 AM EST up reply actions  

You got me goin- GB drafted every one of their starting OL, but this time it favors you. 1 1st rounder, 1 2nd, and 2 4th and a 7th.

by -bobby- on Jan 5, 2012 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

haha keep going. I’m waiting for the good Offense that has three first rounders on their line.

by Brownie's Year on Jan 5, 2012 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

you can have a lot of first rounders, but still give up a lot of pressure.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Jan 5, 2012 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

The OT is going to the Rams, and no way does Minnesota draft RG3. I think the Redskins may make an offer to move ahead of us to get RG3

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

you really think that Kalil is going to get past the Rams and Vikes?

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Jan 5, 2012 6:40 PM EST up reply actions  

The Rams maybe, but I see Vikes going LT if Blackmon is off the board. Either team could take him in my eyes.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 6:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Kalil is the best LT prospect since Joe Thomas or Jake Long. There is no way he should get past 3. And the Vikes would be crazy to pass on him if they have a shot at him — if you don’t have a franchise LT, you should be looking for one and Kalil is one. End of story.

2010 Official DBN League Fantasy Football Champion

by TheDriveStillHurts on Jan 5, 2012 7:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I totally agree. Both teams need a franchise LT and the only reason I don’t know if the Rams do it is because they drafted Jason Smith.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Jan 5, 2012 8:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t remember where I read this but the 3 most important positions are LT, RDE and QB. We have 1.

by HenryDawg on Jan 5, 2012 10:45 PM EST up reply actions  

From what Holmgren says, Randy is supporting the staff and process 100%.

by tribe71 on Jan 5, 2012 12:05 PM EST reply actions  

Holmgren says they are holding in there with the business in response to season tix holders cancelling.

Somebody should ask who made the decision about the hot chocolate upgrade this year. It was REALLY good!

by tribe71 on Jan 5, 2012 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

So does that mean they don’t care that fans are cancelling? They just spent abt 3 mins saying the fans will hang in there no matter what.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

They said that some season ticket holders go and some new ones come in, and that in Seattle it was the same thing, but then all the seats were filled when the team got good.

by tribe71 on Jan 5, 2012 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

anything to keep him from having to be involved or keep him away from his soccer team…and that just fine. Hey, just sign the checks and stay out of the way…

by jonnyphoenix on Jan 5, 2012 3:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Heh, now that he has his guy he’s opposed to constant turnover…

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:05 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah, I had to laugh about that.

by Off-the-Chain on Jan 5, 2012 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s Holmgren’s first year, be gentle.

Dawgs By Nature - Where winning, apparently, did some bad things.

by Simmsinns on Jan 5, 2012 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe he meant to imply his first-third year, as the prez.

Lifes A Dance, You Learn As You Go!

by findlaybrownslover on Jan 5, 2012 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Holmgren left the media with a funny note. What if we draft a defensive player with our #4 pick, would you guys be pissed? Talk amongst ya’selves.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:17 PM EST reply actions  

Better than Richardson. And if it improved our Run D, well…I can’t say I’d be too pissed. Still I think we need way more help on offense this point. But if we aren’t picking a QB and Blackmon is gone, perhaps I’d be alright with this.

by Off-the-Chain on Jan 5, 2012 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Draft Claiborne and move Sheldon Brown to Free Safety would be pretty awesome

"The rush of battle is a potent and almost lethal addiction, for war is a drug."

by dirtyjoe on Jan 5, 2012 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t want to go D with the pick, but yeah better than Richardson.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Jan 5, 2012 6:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I loved the Columbo-esque way he walked away, and then came back to the mic. “One more thing…”

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Not at all. But also, you can’t believe anything they say about the draft from this point on.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree they are masking everything

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Except Hillis, they really never say we would like to have him back, notice?

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Same with FA, I don’t believe anything they say at this point.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 6:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I want the best available player all the way through the draft. Yeah, offense needs a huge boost, but teams are built around extraordinary players. If we decide to pass over one of those players for somebody we’re simply feeling a need for who isn’t as great then that’s a mistake on our part. We’re not in a position to draft for need just yet.

Honor. Courage. Commitment.

by Brownsbacker488 on Jan 5, 2012 4:46 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I think our D is good enough to win a superbowl. That may sound crazy, because it sure seemed we couldnt stop teams at times but I honestly think in the “new” NFL our D is good enough. Just look at the Pats- we definitely have a better D then they have, and they have a great shot to win a SB this year. The league is all about offense- passing offense to be specific. We need to improve that drastically to ever have a shot for a title.

by -bobby- on Jan 5, 2012 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

lol at Tom. “Tony, was that you that sent the email about trading down?”

by Brownie's Year on Jan 5, 2012 12:19 PM EST reply actions  

Holmgren trending on Twitter.

Clemson Tigers 2011 ACC Champions

by emily522 on Jan 5, 2012 12:20 PM EST reply actions  

Anything on Hillis and D Jackson contracts.

by Irish Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:26 PM EST reply actions  

They said they couldn’t say anything about prospective free agent signings. I got the impression their plan is still to build though the draft. Holmgren steered the presser back that way every time Free Agent signing was mentioned.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I hope we re-sign these guys. I’d be especially disappointed if we lost Jackson.

by Off-the-Chain on Jan 5, 2012 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

pissed if they dont keep jackson, hillis….. not so much. i like the guys style but i would see it as no big loss.

Lifes A Dance, You Learn As You Go!

by findlaybrownslover on Jan 5, 2012 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

It also is tampering if they say something about specific players, I believe.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I fear Hillis wont be back

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Loved Hillis last year but he did the exact opposite of what you’re supposed to do in a contract year this year (and I’m not even factoring in the injuries). That mentality has got to go.

"Do I talk to myself? No, I just remind myself of what I’m trying to do. You know, I never answer myself so how can I be talking to myself?" - Ricky Henderson

by dawgtribe on Jan 5, 2012 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Where are you getting this concrete information about Hillis’ mentality? Every quote I’ve read from him or his teammates has sounded pretty positive, not like a diva at all.

by Legoman0721 on Jan 6, 2012 3:50 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

Info on Hillis’ mentality comes from MKC and Grossi. Nuff said.

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
I have the best wife - ever.

by JustBob on Jan 7, 2012 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

You know, things may be bad for us now, but it sounds like all the crap for NYJ are about to hit the fan.

Clemson Tigers 2011 ACC Champions

by emily522 on Jan 5, 2012 12:29 PM EST reply actions  

It all starts with their asshole coach. They deserve to go through this crap.

by Brownie's Year on Jan 5, 2012 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh yeah, Ryan definitely fuels that culture.

Clemson Tigers 2011 ACC Champions

by emily522 on Jan 5, 2012 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

This is actually the first time I’ve been in a “yeah we’re bad but I have legitimate hope” attitude.

I take this optimism shit seriously.

"Who gives two shits about Matt Roth besides Matt Roth and Matt Roth’s mom?" - LocalMan

by The Licensed Optimist on Jan 5, 2012 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

This is actually the first time I’ve been in a "yeah we’re bad but I have legitimate hope" attitude.

I take this optimism shit seriously.

by The Licensed Optimist

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Emily last night was awful! I thought the would kill WV. Sorry I am sure it was painful

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah I put some rants in that Quinn/Tebow thread (don’t ask me why. I just picked that one.) I thought we’d win too. I’ve never been so embarrassed while watching a game in my life. Ridiculous. I’ve cooled down since, and life goes on.

Clemson Tigers 2011 ACC Champions

by emily522 on Jan 5, 2012 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve never been so embarrassed while watching a game in my life.

Charlie Frye’s last start as a Brown was that way for me.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

A couple of friends of mine went to WVU so I was barracking for them.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Don’t worry, it’s as meaningless a loss as any other college football game.

by Roger Dorn on Jan 5, 2012 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Wait. Apparently we lost to Michigan.

Clemson Tigers 2011 ACC Champions

by emily522 on Jan 5, 2012 1:09 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

How bad of a defense does Clemson have to lose 2 games in one night by a combined 140 pts?

Where taking the BROWNS to the SUPERBOWL is not a joke,but a life's passion!

by ctowndawgpound on Jan 6, 2012 10:11 AM EST up reply actions  

It was not good at all.

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden

by Kimble_79 on Jan 6, 2012 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

You know, I don’t want to keep McCoy either but everyone acts like he CAN’T improve and that his height is impossible to overcome.

by macdowellm03 on Jan 5, 2012 12:35 PM EST via Android app reply actions  

It is a combination of height, the way he locks on to receivers and his arm strength

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m sitting here typing @ 4:36 am

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:35 PM EST reply actions  

Lol you people. I’m just waiting for Chris’s article on it. Not wasting time over here. I’m Skyriming.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 5, 2012 12:39 PM EST reply actions  

That sounds like something rude, from urbandictionary. LOL.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 5, 2012 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s an American school bus. Anyway I’m not upside down coz my head isn’t hitting the floor.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok that is a Victorian car but the driver’s head isn’t bouncing off the roof lining.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s how gravity works in Australia. Keeps you clinging to the ground despite the fact that you’re actually upside-down.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

O Rully? The more you know…..

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Jan 5, 2012 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m Skyriming.

so you won’t surface until about 3am tomorrow morning

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Jan 5, 2012 6:49 PM EST up reply actions  

What does ’OTA’s stand for?

by tribe71 on Jan 5, 2012 1:32 PM EST reply actions  

Organized Team Activities.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks.

I hope they try some of that during the last 2 minutes of each half next season too!

by tribe71 on Jan 5, 2012 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Organized Team Activities are actually off-season practices, so I don’t think you’ll cash in on that hope.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Obviously Talking out of their Ass

by jonnyphoenix on Jan 5, 2012 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

did they mention anything about an OC?

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 2:32 PM EST reply actions  

Mum is the word on who and Holmgren said they didn’t interview Chilly last year. Said he gave Shurmur the advice of: If the right guy isn’t there, don’t hire anyone." and he took it.

Dawgs by Nature -- where Montario Hardesty, apparently, 'did some good things'.

by North Coast Flea on Jan 5, 2012 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Good advice.

Clemson Tigers 2011 ACC Champions

by emily522 on Jan 5, 2012 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

well, whoever they get, i hope they have a more vertical offensive philosophy!

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 3:15 PM EST up reply actions  

It looks like every Mock draft has us picking RG3. A couple have us selecting Richardson

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 3:27 PM EST reply actions  

is richardson worthy of a top 5 pick? i haven’t seen him play.

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I really dont know. It seems to me you dont have to use this high of a pick on a RB, but I coudl be wrong

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 3:29 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, i don’t like that idea either, unless he’s gonna be the next jim brown.

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think he is worthy or the next Jim Brown. I’d pass

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden

by Kimble_79 on Jan 5, 2012 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

We have a lot to consider

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

should be a fun draft! ugh…

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn’t give up the draft for Luck either. I’d take a QB with our late 1st rounder or our 2nd rounder. First pick to me should be an explosive playmaker…Blackmon would be perfect.

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden

by Kimble_79 on Jan 5, 2012 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

i agree with this, if he is still there. who are your qb candidates?

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure, not a fan of RG3 at all. Great college player, but I just don’t see him turning out in the NFL. I would say Landry Jones, who has the ideal size for QB being 6-4 and 215lb, but I’m not sure why he struggled so much late in the season. Yeah he lost his go to receiver, but just didn’t seem like the same guy as earlier. I’m very “on the fence” with Nick Foles. Case Keenum intrigues me a lot. Houston passes the crap out of the ball, but 45TDs to 5Ints is pretty damn good.

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden

by Kimble_79 on Jan 5, 2012 3:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Top 10 QB’s per CBSSports.com with associated overall draft ranking. Keenum falls in at #11 in QB rank and #216 overall.
1 Andrew Luck
3 Robert Griffin III
22 *Landry Jones
24 Ryan Tannehill
49 *Nick Foles
63 Kirk Cousins
81 Ryan Lindley
106 Brandon Weeden
160 Russell Wilson
174 Chandler Harnish

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden

by Kimble_79 on Jan 5, 2012 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

foles has all the measurables and good numbers, but i haven’t seen him play. for some reason i haven’t watched much college football this year.

what about acquiring matt flynn from greenbay?

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

that ryan lindley sounds intriguing!

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

…rated 78th in the nation, regardless of position…

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

… Has one career 500-yard passing game, three 400-yard efforts and 12 for 300 or more yards…

Lindy’s tabbed him as the 2011 preseason MWC Offensive Player of the Year and as having the “strongest arm” in the MWC for the second consecutive season … Rated the sixth-best quarterback nationally by Lindy’s …

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

A lot of people are high on Tannehill…probably too high. He could be Gabbert 2.0 with less experience.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Jan 5, 2012 6:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree on Keenum. Living down here in Houston, I’ve watched him a bit, and he gets rid of the ball crazy fast and accurate. I can see him hitting Norwood on quick slants all day.

Dawgs By Nature - The REAL International House of Pancakes

by Gabe Durrant on Jan 5, 2012 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

If anyone thinks Colt McCoy is small…

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

or Tomlinson or Peterson. He is not. At best, he is the next Jamaal Lewis, who was good for about 4 years and then dropped off the map. Then again, he is just as likely to be the next Ronnie Brown or Cedric Benson

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Jan 5, 2012 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

The kid is good. But not worthy at #4.

by Brownie's Year on Jan 5, 2012 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he’s a good average RB. Not a game-changer like a CJ or AP, so definitely not worthy of a top 10 IMO. I would place him as a slightly worst Wells(talent wise)

by The Licensed Pessimist on Jan 5, 2012 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Slightly worse than Beanie Wells? I, an OSU homer, find this to be undervaluing RIchardson.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 6:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I have to agree with him

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Jan 5, 2012 9:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes in that he is a talented player, no in that even the bet running backs are not worth it. Joe Thomas over AP every time.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 6:50 PM EST up reply actions  

nope. Sure, he’ll be a good back but imo, most backs are not worth a top 5 pick when taken there. I can only think of two in the last decade that I would say were worth the pick (and I actually thought they would be worth it at the time), LT and Peterson.

Richardson is like mcfadden who wasn’t truly physically dominant but very good, but also on a good team. Could end up the same way, minus the injuries (Richardson doesn’t seem to have major injury concerns).

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

by bross09 on Jan 5, 2012 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

RG3 Weaknesses

Plays in a spread system that is not NFL caliber…relies on short passes or deep balls to pick up the majority of his yards…mostly utilizes throws along or near the sidelines to complete passes, does not working the middle of the field…need to see him display the same touch he has on his deep ball on throws into the intermediate zone…limited experience dropping back from center…does not climb the pocket as consistently as you’d like…needs to continue to learn that he doesn’t always need to take off…must continue to develop his ability to read progressions…MUST DO A BETTER JOB OF PROTECTING HIMSELF FROM BIG HITS IN THE OPEN FIELD (the real concern if there is one)

That is all I have been saying. I think he is great, just makes me nervous with his ability to run

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 4:20 PM EST reply actions  

if he can stay in the pocket and pick defenses apart, great, but i also like his ability to pick up some yards on the ground (but not like vick)

by athensdawg on Jan 5, 2012 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

That is all I have been saying.

This is correct. That is literally the only thing you’ve been saying. For like a month now.

"We just lost to the Steelers 20 hours ago and that still hurts. I need to get home and eat a burrito." -Phil Dawson

by Adrock2099 on Jan 5, 2012 5:14 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

relies on short passes or deep balls to pick up the majority of his yards

…?

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Well he just totally ignores the middle pass…

by Bernie19Kosar on Jan 6, 2012 12:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Also, sideline throws considered more difficult than throws over the middle, so that would be a positive for RG3.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 6:53 PM EST up reply actions  

That is a NFL Scouting Report not my words

by champion64 on Jan 5, 2012 9:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I need a trasnscript of this press conference. I don’t have access to a computer around here that will give me good quality video. I’m sure it will be boring and dry, and not much information will be shared, but I’m curious nonetheless.

Honor. Courage. Commitment.

by Brownsbacker488 on Jan 5, 2012 4:53 PM EST reply actions  

The official site usually released the transcript at night, which I’m waiting for too. Will arrange it when it happens!

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Jan 5, 2012 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Holmgren was rattled IMO. I think he thought Colt would be better and we would have a general run of the mill offense considering the lack of “playmakers”. That is what good QB’s do. Then a 7-9 season and “progress”.

I have no clue what the fat man will do now. He could start getting a little crazy.

by Johnnypronto on Jan 5, 2012 5:38 PM EST reply actions  

If he’s that dissappointed in Colt and needs a QB, he knows exactly what to do.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Holmgren gets it. He gets the passion the fan base has and the tradition and expectations, and I believe in what they’re doing. It’s easy for all of us (the educated social media fan base) and the real media (the dummies) to “bark” about what’s wrong, but H&H will get it done.

After all, we’re still #3 in all-time playoff appearances…and have two more titles that yellow towel nation.

Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein - Joe Theismann

by Kosar19 on Jan 5, 2012 6:01 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

I believe they call it a piss rag.

by HenryDawg on Jan 5, 2012 10:59 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Just released….Landry Jones is staying another year at Oklahoma.

"The rush of battle is a potent and almost lethal addiction, for war is a drug."

by dirtyjoe on Jan 5, 2012 6:42 PM EST reply actions  

Smart move for him.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Jan 5, 2012 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed. Best thing for Landry is to get the sour taste out of his mouth from this year.

"The rush of battle is a potent and almost lethal addiction, for war is a drug."

by dirtyjoe on Jan 5, 2012 7:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / @# / !@
Small
Top 5 Bubble Players
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Buddhathomas_small
Cleveland Browns 2012 Prediction - A Sailor's Perspective
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / !^ / !@
Cribbs_small
2012 Rookie Predictions
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
A look of the 2012 Browns O-line
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / ( / !@
00000021_small
browns Q for 12 who are they
Gray_cat_thinking_small
That time of year again.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Hadenward-new2_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

N3tdgy_medium_small Brownie's Year

Polar_cap_of_mars_planet_small notthatnoise